ISU Judging System

Last updated

The ISU Judging System or the International Judging System (IJS), occasionally referred to as the Code of Points (COP) system, [1] is the scoring system that has been used since 2004 to judge the figure skating disciplines of men's and ladies' singles, pair skating, ice dance, and synchronized skating. It was designed and implemented by the International Skating Union (ISU), the ruling body of the sport.

Contents

This system of scoring is used in all international competitions sanctioned by the ISU, including the Olympic Games. The ISU Judging System replaced the previous 6.0 system. It was created partially in response to the 2002 Winter Olympics figure skating scandal, in an attempt to make the scoring system more objective and less vulnerable to abuse. [2] U.S. Figure Skating has released a summary of the new judging system. [3]

Previous judging system

Figure skating was formerly judged on a 6.0 scale. This scale is sometimes called "the old scale", or "old system". Skaters were judged on "technical merit" (in the free skate), "required elements" (in the short program), and "presentation" (in both programs). The marks for each program ran from 0.0 to 6.0 and were used to determine a preference ranking, or "ordinal", separately for each judge; the judges' preferences were combined to determine placements for each skater in each program. The placements for the two programs were then combined, with the free skate weighted more heavily than the short program. The highest scoring individual (based on the sum of the weighted placements) was declared the winner.

Scandal and response

A judging controversy occurred during a pair skating event at the 2002 Winter Olympics, which used scoring based on the 6.0 system. A second award ceremony was held in which the top two teams were both awarded gold medals. In 2004, the ISU adopted the New Judging System (NJS), or Code of Points, in an effort to establish a more objective system. This became mandatory at all international competitions in 2006, including the 2006 Winter Olympics. The ISU released an explanation of the advantages of the new system over the 6.0 system. [4]

Technical details

Technical panel

Under the ISU Judging System, the base value of each element performed by the skater is identified by the Technical Panel. The purpose of this panel is to identify all of the elements performed by the skater in real time as they happen. The panel is also responsible for identifying any "technical errors" to jumps; identifying falls of the skater; and the "levels of difficulty" performed in Spins and Steps.

The Technical Panel is composed of the following three people: [5]

  1. The Technical Controller (TC), who supervises the panel, and breaks ties on technical decisions during the "review of elements" when the TS and ATS do not agree. The TC is also responsible for "rule vetting" the program. The TC can discard any elements from scoring that break the rules for that level and specific program.
  2. The Technical Specialist (TS), who verbally calls the elements as they happen.
  3. The Assistant Technical Specialist (ATS), who takes written notes on all of the elements performed and to contribute to any decisions on technical calls during the "review of elements".

The Technical Panel is assisted by two people:

  1. The Data Operator (DO) assists the Technical Panel for recording purposes, and is supervised by the TC. The DO inputs the codes of the elements and levels of difficulty into the computer system.
  2. The Replay Operator (RO) operates an instantaneous slow-motion video replay system and supports the Technical Panel in the identification of the performed elements. [5] [6]

Judging panel

The role of the judges is to evaluate the quality of each element performed (Technical Score) and the quality of the performance (Presentation Score). At most international events and other large National Championships (such as the U.S. Championships), there are nine judges. [5] At smaller competitions the panel might consist of between four and seven judges. An odd number of judges was needed to break ties in the old 6.0 system, but this is no longer necessary with averaging marks in the ISU Judging System.

Technical Element Score (TES)

Each element performed has a base value (which depends on its difficulty), and the judges assign a Grade of Execution (GOE), which can increase or decrease the base value. The GOE is marked as an integer from -5 to +5 since the 2018–19 season. Before the system change, the scale went from -3 to +3. Each plus or minus step in the GOE results in increasing or decreasing the base value by 10 % in single and pair Skating and by 16 % in ice dance. The total of all element scores gives the final Technical Element Score (TES). [5]

Program Component Score (PCS)

In addition to the Technical Element Score, the judges award points on a scale from 0.25 to 10.00 with increments of 0.25 for different program components to grade the overall presentation of the performance. Since the 2022–23 season, the judging panel evaluates three components: Composition (CO), Presentation (PR) and Skating skills (SK). Before the system change, the judges evaluated five components: Skating skills (SS), Transitions (TR), Performance (PE), Composition (CO) and Interpretation (IN). The total of all components is called the Program Component Score (PCS).

  • Composition (CO): This evaluates how the program is designed in relation to the music; how are the different elements connected; how is the available space used; how does the choreography reflect musical phrase and form?
  • Presentation (PR): This evaluates how the program is performed; what does the skater express and project; what energy is created; what is the musical sensitivity and timing; for Pair, Ice Dance and Synchronized skating is the skating appropriately synchronized and showing awareness of space?
  • Skating skills (SK): This mark assesses the skater's command of the blade over the ice, including the ability to skate with power and ease. The judges look at variety and clarity of edges, balance, body control, turns, steps, flow, power and speed. [5] [6]

Computation of scores

The judging panel consists of up to nine judges and one referee. The Technical Panel sends the element codes to the judges' computers for marking. For each element, all of the judges award a mark for Grade of Execution (GOE) that is an integer between –5 and +5. The GOE mark is then translated into a value using the Scale of Value (SOV) table which is published regularly by ISU Communications. [7] The GOE values from the nine judges are averaged using the "trimmed mean" procedure, where the highest and lowest values are discarded and an average is calculated from the remaining seven values. [7] This average value (which may be positive or negative) is finally added to the base value to produce the judging panel's overall score for the element.

Judges also mark the Program Components, which are: Skating Skills; Presentation; and Composition. These Components are marked on a scale of 0.25–10 with 0.25 increments and averaged using the same "trimmed mean" procedure that was used for averaging the GOE marks. Judges also have the power to input majority deductions such as Music Violations and Costume/Prop Violations. The Referee inputs other deductions such as Time Violations, Interruption in Excess and Costume Failures.

Technical elements

The number and type of technical elements included in a skating program depend on the event and on the level of competition. At the senior international level, the short program for senior singles skaters must contain seven technical elements: (a) double or triple axel, (b) triple or quad jump, (c) jump combination including triple or quad jumps (maximum one double jump), (d) flying spin, (e) camel or sit spin with only one change of foot, (f) spin combination with only one change of foot, and (g) step sequence. [8] :Rule 611 The free program for senior singles skaters must contain (a) a maximum of seven jumps, one of which must be an Axel, (b) a maximum of three spins (one a combination, one flying and one with a single position), (c) a maximum of one step sequence, and (d) maximum of one choreographic sequence. [8] :Rule 612

The short program for senior pairs skaters for the season 2023-24 shall consist of the following required elements: (a) any hip lift take-off (hand to hip or upper part of the leg position), (b) double or triple twist lift, (c) double or triple throw jump, (d) double or triple solo jump, (e) solo spin combination with only one change of foot, (f) death spiral forward inside, and (g) step sequence. [8] :Rule 620 The free skating program for senior pairs skaters must contain: (a) maximum of three lifts, not all from the same group, (b) maximum of one twist lift, (c) maximum of two different throw jumps, (d) maximum of one solo jump, (e) maximum of one jump combination or sequence, (f) maximum of one pair spin combination, (g) maximum of one death spiral different from the death spiral of the Short Program, (h) maximum of one choreographic sequence. [8] :Rule 621

Component factoring

The panel's points for each Program Component are multiplied by a factor depending on the event. For singles and pair skating, the factor is uniform for all components, as follows: [8] :Rule 353(m)

DisciplineShort program
(factor)
Free skating
(factor)
Men1.673.33
Women1.332.67
Pairs1.332.67

The factors in ice dance are different for each Program Component and depend on the dance type. [8] :Rule 353(m)

Protocol details

Following an event, the complete judges' scores are published in a document referred to as a protocol. This document uses specific notations as described below.

If a skater attempts more than the allowed number of a certain type of element in a program, then the element is still described and called as such by the technical controller, but receives a base value of 0 as well as a GOE of 0, regardless of how the judges have marked it. On ISU protocol sheets, elements that have been nullified by this are denoted by an asterisk (*) next to the element name. In free skating, for jumps executed twice as solo jumps, the second jump is marked as +REP and receives 70% of its base value. Jump elements performed after the halfway point of a program are marked with x and receive a 10% bonus added to their base value. If a jump has been called as having an unclear take-off edge, that jump is marked with ! and receives a –1 to –2 GOE depending on severity; if a jump has been called as having an incorrect take-off edge (for example, an inside edge on the take-off of a Lutz jump), that jump is marked with e and receives a –2 or –3 GOE depending on the severity of the edge fault. Jumps that are under-rotated are marked with < or << depending on the degree of turns completed on the ice instead of in mid-air. < indicates that a jump had less than a ½ turn but more than a ¼ turn completed on the ice, reducing the base value to 70% of its original value. << indicates a severe under-rotation (a ½ turn or more) and the jump is valued as if it had one less rotation (e.g. a triple would receive the value of a double). [9]

Jumps that are executed in combination or sequence are marked as a single element, with a base mark equal to the sum of the base marks for the individual jumps. However, a combination or sequence can be downgraded – marked with +COMBO (combinations in the short program) or +SEQ (combinations and sequences in the free skate) – in which case the sum of the base values of the jumps is reduced to 80% of its original value.

Scale of Values (SOV) and abbreviations of common elements

Every spring/summer the ISU releases rule updates which include a current Scale of Values (SOV) for different types of element. One is released for Singles/Pairs [10] [11] and another for Ice Dance. [12] Click "show" below to view the abbreviations and codes for different figure skating elements.

AbbreviationFull nameFull Code
Jumps
A = AxelSingle Axel jump 1A
Double Axel2A
Triple Axel3A
Quadruple Axel4A
Lz = LutzSingle Lutz jump 1Lz
Double Lutz2Lz
Triple Lutz3Lz
Quadruple Lutz4Lz
F = FlipSingle Flip jump 1F
Double Flip2F
Triple Flip3F
Quadruple Flip4F
Lo = LoopSingle Loop jump 1Lo
Double Loop2Lo
Triple Loop3Lo
Quadruple Loop4Lo
S = SalchowSingle Salchow jump 1S
Double Salchow2S
Triple Salchow3S
Quadruple Salchow4S
T = Toe loopSingle Toe loop jump 1T
Double Toe loop2T
Triple Toe loop3T
Quadruple Toe loop4T
Throw jumps
AThThrow AxelFull code shows number of revolutions using same concept as above for solo jumps
LzThThrow Lutz
FThThrow Flip
LoThThrow Loop
SThThrow Salchow
TThThrow Toe loop
Spins
CSp Camel Spin Full code ends in nothing for No Value, or B for Base, 1 for Level 1, 2 for Level 2, 3 for Level 3, and 4 for Level 4
LSp Layback Spin
SSp Sit Spin
USpUpright Spin
CoSpCombination Spin
CCSpChange foot Camel Spin
CLSpChange foot Layback Spin
CSSpChange foot Sit Spin
CUSpChange foot Upright Spin
CCoSpChange foot Combination Spin
FCSpFlying Camel Spin
FLSpFlying Layback Spin
FSSpFlying Sit Spin
FUSpFlying Upright Spin
PSpPair Spin
PCoSpPair Combination Spin
Step sequences
ChStChoreographed Step Sequence
CiStCircular step sequence
DiStDiagonal in hold step sequence
MiStMidline in hold step sequence
NtMiTwNot Touching Midline Sequential Twizzles
NtMiStNot Touching Midline Steps
SeStSerpentine step sequence
SlStStraight line step sequence
Choreographic Sequences
ChSqChoreographic Sequence
Spiral sequences
ChSpChoreographed Spiral
SpSqSpiral sequence of any pattern (no longer in use as of 2010)
Pair lifts
TwTwist Lift, Preceded by number of revolutions. E.g. Double Twist is coded 2TW
1LiGroup One Lift. (Hand to Armpit Hold)
2LiGroup Two Lift. (Hand to Waist Hold)
3LiGroup Three Lift (Hand to Hip Hold)
4LiGroup Four Lift (Hand to Hand Hold) (AKA "Press Lift")
Group 5 LiftsBelow all Group 5 lifts, are a pressure lift with rotation on the takeoff by the lady. The difference in code depends on the precise take off.
5ALiAxel Lasso Lift- Lady takes off Forwards edge and facing the same direction as the man. (Both skaters facing forwards.) Lady makes one full Rotation around the man on the way up.
5RLi or 5BLiGroup Five Reverse/Backward Lasso Lift. Like the 5ALi, the lady makes a full revolution on the way up. This lift she and the partner may be back to back, or the lady is towards the man. Her take off from the ice is from a backwards positions.
5SLiStep Takeoff- Similar to 5ALi but direction doesn't matter and only a 1/2 revolution on the way up.
5TLiToe Takeoff- Similar to 5SLi but the lady's toe taps upon taken. Only 1/2 revolution on the way up.
Dance lifts
CuLiCurve lift
RRoLiReverse rotational lift
RoLiRotational lift
SeLiSerpentine lift
StaLiStationary lift
SlLiStraight line lift
Death spirals
BiDsBackward inside death spiral
BoDsBackward outside death spiral
FiDsForward inside death spiral
FoDsForward outside death spiral
Dance elements
STwSynchronized twizzles

The level of a spin or footwork sequence is denoted by the number following the element abbreviation. The number of rotations on a jump is denoted by the number preceding the element abbreviation. For example, 3A denotes a triple Axel, while SlSt4 denotes a level four straight line step sequence. ChSt and ChSq are step sequences and spiral sequences that have no level and a fixed base value.

In ice dance

Ice dance judging is similar to pairs and singles, but uses a separate set of rules and table of values. In the compulsory dance, steps are specified and "elements" are defined for each dance as subsets of the prescribed steps. For compulsory dance only, there is no program component score given for transitions and choreography. Instead there is a timing (TI) program component that is exclusive to the compulsory dance, leaving only four program components in the compulsory dance. In the original dance there are five marked technical elements. In the free dance, there are nine marked technical elements. Unlike singles and pair skating, the different program components are weighted differently in each segment of the competition. The highest factored component(s) in each segment are skating skills and timing in the compulsory dance, interpretation in the original dance, and transitions in the free dance. The calculation of these factors is described in Rule 353. [13]

Highest scores

After being trialed in 2003, the IJS replaced the old 6.0 system in the 2004–2005 figure skating season. Up to and including the 2017–2018 season, the Grade of Execution (GOE) scoring system for each program element ranged between –3 and +3. Starting with the 2018–2019 season, the GOE was expanded to range between –5 and +5. Hence, the International Skating Union (ISU) have restarted all records from the 2018–2019 season and all previous statistics have been marked as "historical". [14]

The ISU only recognizes the best scores that are set at international competitions run under the ISU's rules, and does not recognize, for example, scores that are obtained at national figure skating championships. The competitions recognized by the ISU are: Winter Olympics (including the team event), Youth Olympics (including the team event), World Championships, World Junior Championships, European Championships, Four Continents Championships, GP events, Junior GP events, Challenger Series events, and World Team Trophy.

List of highest scores in figure skating

For highest scores achieved prior to the 2018–2019 season, see List of highest historical scores in figure skating.

List of highest junior scores in figure skating

For highest junior scores prior to the 2018–2019 season, see List of highest historical junior scores in figure skating.

Subjectivity

Like gymnastics and diving competitions, judging in figure skating is intrinsically subjective. Although there may be general consensus that one skater "looks better" than another, it is difficult to reach agreement on what causes one skater to be marked as 5.5 and another to be 5.75 for a particular program component. As judges, coaches, and skaters gain more experience with the new system, greater consensus may emerge. However, for the 2006 Olympics there were cases of 1 to 1.5 point differences in component marks from different judges.[ citation needed ] This range of difference implies that "observer bias" determines about 20% of the mark given by a judge.[ citation needed ] Averaging over many judges reduces the effect of this bias in the final score, but there will remain about a 2% spread in the average artistic marks from the randomly selected subsets of judges.[ citation needed ]

Aside from intra-expert subjectivity, skating is very open to misjudgement from everyday spectators who only see skating casually, e.g. every four years at the Olympics. A skater's jump may look perfect, but the general public will not be aware that the competitor landed on an incorrect edge, therefore receiving fewer points for an element, resulting in the appearance of haphazard or biased judging.

Criticism

The aim of the IJS is to ensure that the judging of figure skating competitions is more consistent with the judging of sports such as diving and gymnastics. It also includes features intended to make judging more resistant to pressure by special interests. However, there is debate as to whether the new system is in fact an improvement over the old 6.0 system. [15] [16] One criticism of the adoption of the IJS was in the way it alienated casual figure skating fans; whereas the 6.0 system was universally understood due to its simplicity and intuitive scale, the large cumulative scores given by the IJS are less intuitive. [16] Judging bias was also found to be about 20 percent greater in the IJS than in the 6.0 system, with judges being inclined to give higher marks to skaters from their own country. [16]

Initially under the new ISU rules, the judges' marks were anonymous, which removed any public accountability of the judges for their marks. However, problems with this system came to the forefront during the Sochi Olympics in 2014 following Russian skater Adelina Sotnikova's victory over Yuna Kim. In large part due to the judging and technical panels including four Russians, these results sparked a debate over the judges' objectivity. [17] In June 2016 the ISU Congress voted to abolish anonymous judging altogether. [18]

Ties

While the IJS has minimized the number of ties and the need for multiple tiebreaks, as there were under the old 6.0 system, ties do still occur for both overall score and also for single segments of the competition. Short/rhythm segment ties are broken based on the TES score and free segment ties on the PCS. For ties in the overall score, ties are broken based on the free segment placement.

EventSkatersDisciplineSegmentScoreSegment Placement
(Tiebreaker)
Ref
2004 Skate America Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg Cynthia Phaneuf Ladies Short program 50.20Tied third
(Identical TES and PCS)
[19]
Flag of the United States.svg Alissa Czisny
2007 World Championships Flag of Italy.svg Carolina Kostner Total score168.92Nakano 5th, Kostner 6th
(Higher free skating placement)
[20]
Flag of Japan.svg Yukari Nakano
2008 U.S. Championships Flag of the United States.svg Evan Lysacek Men 244.77Lysacek 1st, Weir 2nd
(Higher free skating placement)
[21]
Flag of the United States.svg Johnny Weir
2009 U.S. Championships Flag of the United States.svg Katrina HackerLadiesShort program54.79Hacker 5th, Nagasu 6th
(Higher TES)
[22]
Flag of the United States.svg Mirai Nagasu
Flag of the United States.svg Laney Diggs Total score147.48Diggs 10th, Musademba 11th
(Higher free skating placement)
[23]
Flag of the United States.svg Kristine Musademba
2009 World Championships Flag of Russia.svg Sergei Voronov MenShort program72.15Voronov 9th, Abbott 10th
(Higher TES)
[24]
Flag of the United States.svg Jeremy Abbott
2009 World Team Trophy Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg Joannie Rochette Ladies62.08Rochette 2nd, Ando 3rd
(Higher TES)
[25]
Flag of Japan.svg Miki Ando
2011 World Championships Flag of Italy.svg Carolina Kostner 59.75Leonova 5th, Kostner 6th
(Higher TES)
[26]
Flag of Russia.svg Alena Leonova
2018 Winter Olympics Olympic flag.svg Evgenia Medvedeva Free skating 156.65Medvedeva 1st, Zagitova 2nd
(Higher PCS)
[27]
Olympic flag.svg Alina Zagitova
2019 Russian Championships Flag of Russia.svg Stanislava Konstantinova Short program74.40Kostornaia 3rd, Konstantinova 4th
(Higher TES)
[28]
Flag of Russia.svg Alena Kostornaia
2020 Rostelecom Cup Flag of Russia.svg Makar Ignatov MenTotal score260.78Semenenko 6th, Ignatov 7th
(Higher free skating placement)
[29]
Flag of Russia.svg Evgeni Semenenko
Flag of Estonia.svg Eva-Lotta Kiibus LadiesFree skating128.12Trusova 4th, Kiibus 5th
(Higher PCS)
[30]
Flag of Russia.svg Alexandra Trusova
2021 World Championships Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg Chen Hongyi Short program58.81Březinová 21st, Chen 22nd
(Higher TES)
[31]
Flag of the Czech Republic.svg Eliška Březinová
2021 World Team Trophy Flag of Russia.svg Evgeni Semenenko MenTotal score255.19Semenenko 5th, Brown 6th
(Higher free skating placement)
[32]
Flag of the United States.svg Jason Brown
2021 Lake Placid Ice Dance International Flag of Australia (converted).svg Holly Harris / Jason Chan Ice dance 159.87Harris/Chan 4th, Pate/Bye 5th
(Higher free dance placement)
[33]
Flag of the United States.svg Eva Pate / Logan Bye
2021 CS Nebelhorn Trophy Flag of Latvia.svg Anete Lāce WomenShort program54.96Lāce 8th, Taljegård 9th
(Higher TES)
[34]
Flag of Sweden.svg Josefin Taljegård
Flag of Hong Kong.svg Joanna So 48.79So 19th, Sauter 20th
(Higher TES)
Flag of Romania.svg Julia Sauter
Flag of Germany.svg Kai Jagoda MenFree skating107.75Jagoda 20th, Lewton Brain 21st
(Higher PCS)
[35]
Flag of Monaco.svg Davide Lewton Brain
2021 CS Finlandia Trophy Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg Keegan Messing MenShort program92.39Messing 1st, Brown 2nd
(Higher TES)
[36]
Flag of the United States.svg Jason Brown
2023 Russian Championships Flag of Russia.svg Petr Gumennik Total score295.07Semenenko 1st, Gumennik 2nd
(Higher free skating placement)
[37]
Flag of Russia.svg Evgeni Semenenko
2024 European Championships Flag of Bulgaria.svg Alexandra Feigin WomenShort program57.33Feigin 12th, Taljegård 13th (Higher TES) [38]
Flag of Sweden.svg Josefin Taljegård

Judge reduction in 2008

In 2008, the ISU ruled to reduce the number of judges from twelve to nine. The need to reduce costs was given as the prime reason for this change. [39] Since the highest and lowest extreme scores are discounted, the scores of seven judges (rather than ten) determine the outcome of competitions.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Figure skating</span> Ice sport performed on figure skates

Figure skating is a sport in which individuals, pairs, or groups perform on figure skates on ice. It was the first winter sport to be included in the Olympic Games, with its introduction occurring at the 1908 Olympics in London. The Olympic disciplines are men's singles, women's singles, pair skating, and ice dance; the four individual disciplines are also combined into a team event, which was first included in the Winter Olympics in 2014. The non-Olympic disciplines include synchronized skating, Theater on Ice, and four skating. From intermediate through senior-level competition, skaters generally perform two programs, which, depending on the discipline, may include spins, jumps, moves in the field, lifts, throw jumps, death spirals, and other elements or moves.

Figure skating jumps are an element of three competitive figure skating disciplines: men's singles, women's singles, and pair skating – but not ice dancing. Jumping in figure skating is "relatively recent". They were originally individual compulsory figures, and sometimes special figures; many jumps were named after the skaters who invented them or from the figures from which they were developed. It was not until the early part of the 20th century, well after the establishment of organized skating competitions, when jumps with the potential of being completed with multiple revolutions were invented and when jumps were formally categorized. In the 1920s Austrian skaters began to perform the first double jumps in practice. Skaters experimented with jumps, and by the end of the period, the modern repertoire of jumps had been developed. Jumps did not have a major role in free skating programs during international competitions until the 1930s. During the post-war period and into the 1950s and early 1960s, triple jumps became more common for both male and female skaters, and a full repertoire of two-revolution jumps had been fully developed. In the 1980s men were expected to complete four or five difficult triple jumps, and women had to perform the easier triples. By the 1990s, after compulsory figures were removed from competitions, multi-revolution jumps became more important in figure skating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Synchronized skating</span> Ice skating discipline

Synchronized skating, often called synchro, is an ice skating sport where between 8 and 20 skaters perform together as a team. They move as a flowing unit at high speed over the ice, while performing elements and footwork.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Figure skating at the Olympic Games</span>

Figure skating was first contested in the Olympic Games at the 1908 Summer Olympics. Since 1924, the sport has been a part of the Winter Olympic Games.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pair skating</span> Discipline of figure skating

Pair skating is a figure skating discipline defined by the International Skating Union (ISU) as "the skating of two persons in unison who perform their movements in such harmony with each other as to give the impression of genuine Pair Skating as compared with independent Single Skating". The ISU also states that a pairs team consists of "one Woman and one Man". Pair skating, along with men's and women's single skating, has been an Olympic discipline since figure skating, the oldest Winter Olympic sport, was introduced at the 1908 Summer Olympics in London. The ISU World Figure Skating Championships introduced pair skating in 1908.

The following is a glossary of figure skating terms, sorted alphabetically.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Single skating</span> Discipline of figure skating

Single skating is a discipline of figure skating in which male and female skaters compete individually. Men's singles and women's singles are governed by the International Skating Union (ISU). Figure skating is the oldest winter sport contested at the Olympics, with men's and women's single skating appearing as two of the four figure skating events at the London Games in 1908.

The short program of figure skating is the first of two segments of competitions, skated before the free skating program. It lasts, for both senior and junior singles and pair skaters, 2 minutes and 40 seconds. In synchronized skating, for both juniors and seniors, the short program lasts 2 minutes and 50 seconds. Vocal music with lyrics is allowed for all disciplines since the 2014–2015 season. The short program for single skaters and for pair skaters consists of seven required elements, and there are six required elements for synchronized skaters.

The free skating segment of figure skating, also called the free skate and the long program, is the second of two segments of competitions, skated after the short program. Its duration, across all disciplines, is four minutes for senior skaters and teams, and three and one-half minutes for junior skaters and teams. Vocal music with lyrics is allowed for all disciplines since the 2014—2015 season. The free skating program, across all disciplines, must be well-balanced and include certain elements described and published by the International Skating Union (ISU).

The 6.0 system of judging figure skating was developed during the early days of the sport, when early international competitions consisted of only compulsory figures. Skaters performed each figure three times on each foot, for a total of six, which as writer Ellyn Kestnbaum states, "gave rise to the system of awarding marks based on a standard of 6.0 as perfection". It was used in competitive figure skating until 2004, when it was replaced by the ISU Judging System in international competitions, as a result of the 2002 Winter Olympics figure skating scandal. British ice dancers Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean earned the most overall 6.0s in ice dance, Midori Ito from Japan has the most 6.0s in single skating, and Irina Rodnina from Russia, with two different partners, has the most 6.0s in pair skating.

A step sequence is a required element in all four disciplines of figure skating, men's single skating, women's single skating, pair skating, and ice dance. Step sequences have been defined as "steps and turns in a pattern on the ice". Skaters earn the most points in step sequences by performing steps and movements with "flair and personality", by turning in both directions, by using one foot and then the other, and by including up and down movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Figure skating at the 2014 Winter Olympics</span>

Figure skating at the 2014 Winter Olympics was held at the Iceberg Skating Palace in Sochi, Russia. The five events took place between 6–22 February 2014. For the first time at the Winter Olympics, a figure skating team event was held.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Competition elements in ice dance</span>

Ice dance, a discipline of figure skating, has required elements that make up a well-balanced rhythm dance program and free dance program, which must be performed during competitions. They include: the dance lift, the dance spin, the step sequence, turn sequences, and choreographic elements. The elements must be performed in specific ways, as described by published communications by the International Skating Union (ISU), unless otherwise specified. The ISU has also provided a list of illegal movements.

A choreographic sequence is a required element for figure skating in all international competitions. It is required in the free skating programs of senior and junior single skaters and in the free skating programs of senior pair skaters. It is also required during ice dancers' rhythm dances and free dances. Judges do not evaluate individual elements in a choreographic sequence; rather, they note that it was accomplished. Skaters must fulfill certain requirements to fulfill the highest points possible during choreographic sequences. There are six types of choreographic elements in ice dance: the Choreographic lift, the Choreographic spinning movement, the Choreographic assisted jump movement, the Choreographic twizzling movement, the Choreographic sliding movement, and the Choreographic character step sequence.

The 2019–20 Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final and ISU Junior Grand Prix Final was held from December 5–8, 2019 at the Torino Palavela in Turin, Italy. The combined event was the culmination of two international series — the Grand Prix of Figure Skating and the Junior Grand Prix. Medals were awarded in the disciplines of men's singles, ladies' singles, pair skating, and ice dance on the senior and junior levels.

References

  1. "Swiss Timing and Figure Skating". 2017 Swiss Timing. Retrieved 25 March 2018.
  2. "Scoring System Approved". The New York Times . Retrieved 25 July 2011.
  3. "UNDERSTANDING THE INTERNATIONAL JUDGING SYSTEM" (PDF). Retrieved 18 September 2023.
  4. "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on the ISU New Judging System" . Retrieved 18 September 2023.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 "ISU Figure Skating Media Guide 2023/24" . Retrieved 12 October 2023.
  6. 1 2 "THE 2023-24 OFFICIAL U.S. FIGURE SKATING RULEBOOK" (PDF). Retrieved 19 September 2023.
  7. 1 2 "ISU Constitution & Regulations". Isu.org. Retrieved 22 April 2022.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 ISW (14 September 2022). "Special Regulations & Technical Rules Single & Pair Skating & Ice Dance 2022" . Retrieved 28 September 2023.
  9. "Communication No. 1611 – Single & Pair Skating – Scale of Values, Levels of Difficulty and Guidelines for marking Grade of Execution". International Skating Union. 4 May 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 May 2010. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
  10. "Communication 2475—Scale of Values Single and Pair Skating 2022/23". 4 May 2022. Retrieved 28 September 2023.
    Per Communication 2558, ISU Communication 2475 Scale of Value Single & Pair Skating will remain valid for season 2023/24.
  11. "Communication 2558—Levels of Difficulty and Guidelines for marking Grade of Execution and Program Components Season 2023/24". 9 August 2023. Retrieved 28 September 2023.
  12. "Communication No. 2564—Ice Dance Scale of Values season 2023/24". 31 May 2023. Retrieved 28 September 2023.
  13. "ISU SPECIAL REGULATIONS & TECHNICAL RULES SINGLE & PAIR SKATING and ICE DANCE 2022" . Retrieved 28 September 2023.
  14. "Statistics including Personal Best & Season's Best information". International Skating Union . Retrieved 22 July 2016.
  15. Balding, Clare (19 February 2006). "Jury is out on skating's latest judging system". The Guardian . Retrieved 2 October 2019.
  16. 1 2 3 Pilon, Mary; Longman, Jere (5 February 2014). "Despite Revamp, Figure Skating Gets Mixed Marks". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 6 February 2014. Retrieved 2 October 2019.
  17. "Olympic figure skater won't defend gold medal". ESPN.com. 27 August 2017. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
  18. "ISU vote to abolish anonymous judging system in figure skating to "increase transparency"". inside the games. 8 June 2016. Retrieved 25 March 2018.
  19. SmartOnes Skate America: Ladies – Short Program
  20. ISU World Figure Skating Championships 2007: Ladies – Results
  21. "Tie Breaker Allows Lysacek to Defend Title (Published 2008)". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 22 April 2023.
  22. 2009 US Nationals Ladies Short Program
  23. 2009 US Nationals Ladies Final Results
  24. ISU World Figure Skating Championships 2009: Men – Short Program
  25. ISU World Team Trophy in Figure Skating 2009: Ladies – Short Program
  26. ISU World Figure Skating Championships 2011: Ladies – Short Program
  27. Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018: Ladies' Single Skating – Free Skating Results
  28. Rostelecom Russian Nationals 2019: Ladies – Short Program
  29. ISU GP Rostelecom Cup 2020: Men – Result
  30. ISU GP Rostelecom Cup 2020: Ladies – Free Skating
  31. ISU World Figure Skating Championships 2021: Ladies – Short Program
  32. ISU World Team Trophy in Figure Skating 2021: Team Standing
  33. 2021 Lake Placid Ice Dance International: Senior Ice Dance
  34. ISU CS Nebelhorn Trophy 2021 OWG Qualifying: Women – Short Program
  35. ISU CS Nebelhorn Trophy 2021 OWG Qualifying: Men – Free Skating
  36. ISU CS Finlandia Trophy 2021: Men – Short Program
  37. Rostelecom Russian Nationals 2023: Men – Result
  38. European Championships 2024: Women's short program – Results
  39. Rutherford, Lynn (28 April 2008). "How many judges are there, anyway?". web.icenetwork.com. Retrieved 25 May 2018.