Illinois Public Access Counselor

Last updated

Public Access Bureau
Seal of the Attorney General of Illinois.svg
Bureau overview
FormedDecember 2004 (2004-12)
Jurisdiction Government of Illinois
Headquarters Springfield, Illinois
Bureau executive
  • Leah Bartelt, Public Access Counselor
Parent department Illinois Attorney General
Website https://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/open-and-honest-government/pac/

The Illinois Public Access Counselor (PAC) is an attorney in the office of the Illinois Attorney General who is responsible for enforcing the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Open Meetings Act (OMA). The PAC is the head of the Public Access Bureau, a group of more than one dozen attorneys who process complaints against public bodies and provide education to the public on Illinois' transparency laws.

Contents

Background

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is an Illinois statute that grants to all persons the right to copy and inspect public records in the state. The law applies to executive and legislative bodies of state government, units of local government, and other entities defined as "public bodies". All records related to governmental business are presumed to be open for inspection by the public, except for information specifically exempted from disclosure by law. Once a person submits a request to inspect public records, the public body is required to respond within deadlines specified by FOIA. Public bodies are authorized to deny access to certain types of information enumerated by FOIA and other statutes.

The Open Meetings Act (OMA) is a related Illinois statute that grants to all persons the right to attend meetings in which public business is discussed. "Public bodies", defined similarly as in FOIA, are required to provide advance notice of meetings to the public and maintain minutes for public inspection. All discussions of public business are presumed to be open to the public, except for matters specifically exempted by law. OMA also requires public bodies to allow public comment at every meeting.

Persons alleging a violation of FOIA or OMA may file a complaint with the PAC or the Illinois circuit courts.

Process

If a public body denies a FOIA request, the requester may appeal to the PAC within 60 days of the FOIA denial. However, FOIA requests to the General Assembly or its subsidiary bodies may not be appealed to the PAC. The PAC may issue a binding opinion within 60 days of receiving the request for review, and this timeline may be extended by an additional 21 days. If a member of the public believes that a public body has violated OMA, that person must file a complaint with the PAC within 60 days of the alleged violation. The timeline for the PAC to make a decision under OMA is similar to that under FOIA. [1]

If the PAC issues a binding opinion, the result is binding on the requester and the public body, but either side may continue to appeal in court under administrative review. [1] Binding opinions are rare, as they are issued for only less than half of one percent of complaints submitted to the PAC. [2] Since binding opinions are subject to legal challenge in the courts, the PAC is intentionally conservative in issuing them, seeing itself as an alternative to litigation. [3] The PAC generally issues binding opinions on "issues of broad public interest", and is careful to research each case to ensure that its opinions are upheld upon judicial review. Journalists and news organizations are more likely than private citizen requesters to receive a binding opinion. [2]

When the PAC declines to issue a binding opinion, it is no longer bound by any statutory deadlines to resolve the matter. It may issue a non-binding or advisory opinion, resolve the dispute through mediation, or decide to take no further action on the matter. [2] When the PAC chooses to resolve a complaint informally, it is more likely that the PAC would have ruled against the public body anyway. Usually, cases are informally resolved once the public body releases records that should not have been withheld in the first place. [4] Requesters often wait months or years before their appeals are resolved by the PAC. Of the more than 28,000 appeals filed with the PAC from January 2010 through August 2018, over 3,800 appeals took more than one year to resolve, and about 500 took more than four years to resolve. [2]

The PAC maintains a dataset to internally track all requests for review. Each case is labeled with one of 32 codes, to indicate the "disposition" or outcome of each complaint. Dispositions can be substantive or not. Non-substantive dispositions include complaints that were resolved through agreement or mediation, withdrawn, untimely, or otherwise procedurally defective. Dispositions can also be non-substantive because the complaints were not directed at public bodies, because a lawsuit has been filed concerning the same issue, or because the public body responded to the FOIA request after the PAC intervened. Cases that are still under review are marked "open". Substantive dispositions, specifically for FOIA, include the following: [4]

Of the cases resolved with substantive dispositions, the PAC has found roughly 30% to have been FOIA violations. Top offenders include the City of East St. Louis, University of Illinois system, City of Joliet, Illinois Department of Central Management Services, Illinois Department of Transportation, and Chicago Police Department. For OMA requests for review, disposition codes are generic and do not identify the specific requirements of OMA that were alleged to have been violated. [4]

History

Attorney General Lisa Madigan created the Public Access Counselor position in 2004. Lisa Madigan 2011.jpg
Attorney General Lisa Madigan created the Public Access Counselor position in 2004.

Attorney General Lisa Madigan established the Public Access and Opinions Division in December 2004, and appointed Terry Mutchler as the first Public Access Counselor. [5] The PAC could mediate disputes and write letters to encourage public bodies to comply with FOIA. However, the PAC had no formal enforcement powers, and its capacities were merely advisory and non-binding. This left the practical burden on requesters to pursue lengthy, time-consuming litigation. Requesters were not likely to appeal to the courts, creating a natural deterrent that public bodies leveraged to avoid full compliance. [6]

The PAC received additional enforcement powers on January 1, 2010, after the passage of Public Act 96-542. With this new law, requesters were allowed to submit "requests for review" to the PAC, which became a more viable alternative to litigation because it provided a level "playing field" between two government agencies (the PAC and the public body being challenged), rather than pitting private citizens against public bodies with more resources. The General Assembly also authorized the PAC to issue subpoenas and file lawsuits in the circuit courts to force compliance with a binding opinion or prevent violations of the law. [6]

The Illinois States Attorneys Association objected to the changes, as the Attorney General and the PAC acquired an expanded role under the new law. The Association suggested that the role of the state's attorney should be expanded instead. [7] As of 2019, the PAC employed 13 full-time attorneys, three supervisors, and four support staff. [4]

From 2013 through 2021, the PAC processed approximately 3,500 FOIA complaints and 360 OMA complaints per year, and that volume dropped by over 10 percent in 2022. The Attorney General's office attributed the decline to better training for public officials. [8]

Reception

After receiving its new enforcement powers, the PAC quickly became backlogged, handling nearly 6,500 requests for review from January 2010 through April 2011. Requesters often had to wait over 3 months before their appeals were resolved. [9] Nonetheless, supporters viewed the backlog as a sign of growing pains and an expected outcome of the new enforcement mechanisms. [10] Terry Pastika, executive director of the Citizen Advocacy Center, viewed the new appeals process as an "enormous improvement" from before, despite the delays. [9]

Although the PAC may issue subpoenas to obtain more information, it has declined to exercise its authority to do so. [11] ProPublica and the Chicago Sun-Times published a report on the PAC in 2018, labeling it "an overwhelmed and inconsistent enforcement system". The PAC has rarely used its full authority to enforce FOIA and OMA, and violators have faced few consequences for ignoring the PAC's opinions. Bruce Rushton, a journalist for the Illinois Times , suggested "pull[ing] the plug on the PAC's office", contending that the Attorney General's office is too politicized to resolve disputes concerning other public bodies. [2]

ProPublica further criticized the PAC's weak enforcement actions in the aftermath of the murder of Laquan McDonald by an officer of the Chicago Police Department in October 2014. A lawsuit filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County was instrumental in securing the release of a video recording of McDonald's murder in November 2015, while the PAC's involvement was delayed and its opinion non-binding. By 2018, journalists and citizen activists filed at least 10 appeals to the PAC after Chicago officials blocked requests for records related to the incident, but most appeals stayed open for several months or years. The PAC issued one binding opinion in this matter, Public Access Opinion 16-006, ordering the Police Department to release private emails from officers related to McDonald's murder. [12]

Related Research Articles

Freedom of information laws allow access by the general public to data held by national governments and, where applicable, by state and local governments. The emergence of freedom of information legislation was a response to increasing dissatisfaction with the secrecy surrounding government policy development and decision making. In recent years Access to Information Act has also been used. They establish a "right-to-know" legal process by which requests may be made for government-held information, to be received freely or at minimal cost, barring standard exceptions. Also variously referred to as open records, or sunshine laws, governments are typically bound by a duty to publish and promote openness. In many countries there are constitutional guarantees for the right of access to information, but these are usually unused if specific support legislation does not exist. Additionally, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16 has a target to ensure public access to information and the protection of fundamental freedoms as a means to ensure accountable, inclusive and just institutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom of Information Act (United States)</span> 1967 US statute regarding access to information held by the US government

The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, is the United States federal freedom of information law that requires the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased or uncirculated information and documents controlled by the U.S. government, state, or other public authority upon request. The act defines agency records subject to disclosure, outlines mandatory disclosure procedures, and includes nine exemptions that define categories of information not subject to disclosure. The act was intended to make U.S. government agencies' functions more transparent so that the American public could more easily identify problems in government functioning and put pressure on Congress, agency officials, and the president to address them. The FOIA has been changed repeatedly by both the legislative and executive branches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illinois Attorney General</span> Attorney General for the U.S. state of Illinois

The Illinois attorney general is the highest legal officer of the state of Illinois in the United States. Originally an appointed office, it is now an office filled by statewide election. Based in Chicago and Springfield, the attorney general is responsible for providing legal counsel for the various state agencies including the governor of Illinois and Illinois General Assembly, as well as conducting all legal affairs pertaining to the state.

An unfair labor practice (ULP) in United States labor law refers to certain actions taken by employers or unions that violate the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 29 U.S.C. § 151–169 and other legislation. Such acts are investigated by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Public records are documents or pieces of information that are not considered confidential and generally pertain to the conduct of government.

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press(RCFP) is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., that provides pro bono legal services and resources to and on behalf of journalists. The organization pursues litigation, offers direct representation, submits amicus curiae briefs, and provides other legal assistance on matters involving the First Amendment, press freedom, freedom of information, and court access issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Colorado Amendment 41</span>

Amendment 41 is a citizen initiative adopted by Colorado voters in the 2006 general election. Amendment 41 has three main sections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Missouri Attorney General</span> Attorney general for the U.S. state of Missouri

The Office of the Missouri Attorney General was created in 1806 when Missouri was part of the Louisiana Territory. Missouri's first Constitution in 1820 provided for an appointed attorney general, but since the 1865 Constitution, the Attorney General has been elected. As of January 2023, there have been 44 attorneys general in Missouri.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional Court of Slovenia</span> National constitutional court

onstitutional complaintThe Constitutional Court of Slovenia is a special court established by the Slovenian Constitution. Since its inception, the Court has been located in the city of Ljubljana. It is the highest court in the country for reviewing the constitutionality and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, otherwise the highest court in the country is the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia. The constitutional court is not part of any branch of government and is an independent state body.

United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989), was a case before the United States Supreme Court.

Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc., 562 U.S. 397 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case on aspects of corporate personhood. It held that the exemption from Freedom of Information Act disclosure requirements for law enforcement records which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" does not protect information related to corporate privacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whistleblower protection in the United States</span>

A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. The Whistleblower Protection Act was made into federal law in the United States in 1989.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office of the Oklahoma Attorney General</span>

The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) is an agency of the Oklahoma state government that is headed by the Attorney General of Oklahoma. The OAG is responsible for supervising the administration of justice across the State, providing legal assistance to the State government, and prosecuting violators of State law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Access to public information in Serbia</span>

Access to public information and freedom of information (FOI) refer to the right of access to information held by public bodies also known as "right to know". Access to public information is considered of fundamental importance for the effective functioning of democratic systems, as it enhances governments' and public officials' accountability, boosting people participation and allowing their informed participation into public life. The fundamental premise of the right of access to public information is that the information held by governmental institutions is in principle public and may be concealed only on the basis of legitimate reasons which should be detailed in the law.

Campaign for Accountability (CfA) is a liberal 501(c)(3) non-profit ethics watchdog group headquartered in Washington, D.C. CfA was co-founded in May 2015 by Anne Weismann, former legal counsel for the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), and Louis Mayberg, former chairman of CREW. CfA group states that it "uses research, litigation and aggressive communications to expose misconduct and malfeasance in public life."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal challenges to the Trump travel ban</span> Legal disputes

Executive Order 13769 was signed by U.S. President Donald Trump on January 27, 2017, and quickly became the subject of legal challenges in the federal courts of the United States. The order sought to restrict travel from seven Muslim majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. The plaintiffs challenging the order argued that it contravened the United States Constitution, federal statutes, or both. On March 16, 2017, Executive Order 13769 was superseded by Executive Order 13780, which took legal objections into account and removed Iraq from affected countries. Then on September 24, 2017, Executive Order 13780 was superseded by Presidential Proclamation 9645 which is aimed at more permanently establishing travel restrictions on those countries except Sudan, while adding North Korea and Venezuela which had not previously been included.

McBurney v. Young, 569 U.S. 221 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld Virginia and all states' right to restrict citizen requests for state government documents to citizens of that state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illinois Public Access Opinion 16-006</span> Illinois Attorney General opinion concerning freedom of information

Illinois Public Access Opinion 16-006 is a binding opinion issued in 2016 by the Illinois Attorney General pursuant to the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Issued in the aftermath of the murder of Laquan McDonald, the opinion addressed a public records request from CNN for private emails by officers of the Chicago Police Department (CPD) related to the incident. After CPD denied CNN's request, the Attorney General's office, led by Lisa Madigan, ruled that the police officers' private emails about McDonald's murder were subject to public disclosure, even though those emails were communicated on accounts outside of the police department's email servers. The binding opinion was later upheld by the Circuit Court of Cook County, though CNN never received the records that it had requested.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illinois Freedom of Information Act</span> Public records law in Illinois

The Illinois Freedom of Information Act, 5 ILCS 140/1 et seq., is an Illinois statute that grants to all persons the right to copy and inspect public records in the state. The law applies to executive and legislative bodies of state government, units of local government, and other entities defined as "public bodies". All records related to governmental business are presumed to be open for inspection by the public, except for information specifically exempted from disclosure by law. The statute is modeled after the federal Freedom of Information Act and serves a similar purpose as freedom of information legislation in the other U.S. states.

<i>City of Champaign v. Madigan</i> Illinois court case concerning freedom of information

City of Champaign v. Madigan, 2013 IL App (4th) 120662, 992 N.E.2d 629 (2013), is a case decided by the Illinois Appellate Court in 2013 concerning the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The court ruled that messages sent and received by elected officials during a city council meeting are subject to public disclosure, even when those communications are stored on personal electronic devices. The case addressed a public records request from a reporter for The News-Gazette in Champaign, Illinois, who observed Champaign city council members and the mayor using their personal electronic devices to send messages, outside the public's view, during a city council meeting.

References

  1. 1 2 Paul Simon Public Policy Institute (2011). A Citizen’s Guide to Using the Illinois Freedom of Information Act (PDF) (Report). Southern Illinois University Board of Trustees. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 7, 2020. Retrieved November 28, 2020– via Fox River & Countryside Fire/Rescue District.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Dumke, Mick (October 11, 2018). "Citizens Count on the Illinois Freedom of Information Act but Keep Getting Shut Out". ProPublica . Archived from the original on December 26, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  3. ↑ Kueppers, Courtney (April 9, 2021). "The flip side of FOIA: Mountains of paper, small government staffs and — for some — an attitude problem". Chicago Tribune . Archived from the original on June 18, 2021. Retrieved June 12, 2022.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Haider, Annum (January 10, 2019). "Analysis: Illinois Law Hasn't Stopped Public Agencies From Withholding Records". Better Government Association . Archived from the original on December 30, 2021. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  5. ↑ "Madigan Releases Open Government Statistics; More than 75 Percent of Cases Open in 2005 were Requests for Assistance from Illinois Citizens" (Press release). Chicago: Illinois Attorney General. March 14, 2006. Archived from the original on October 17, 2020. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
  6. 1 2 Klaper, Sarah (Fall 2010). "The Sun Peeking Around the Corner: Illinois' New Freedom of Information Act as a National Model" (PDF). Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal . 10 (1). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 9, 2020. Retrieved December 11, 2020.
  7. ↑ Helle, Steven (2010). "Survey of Illinois Law: New Freedom of Information Act – Peeking Behind the Paper Curtain" (PDF). Southern Illinois University Law Journal . 34: 1089–1105. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 21, 2015. Retrieved December 11, 2020.
  8. ↑ Griffin, Jake (July 29, 2023). "Illinois AG's office sees the fewest public access help requests in a decade". Daily Herald . Archived from the original on November 9, 2023. Retrieved November 9, 2023.
  9. 1 2 Kidwell, David; Cohen, Jodi S. (April 2, 2011). "Backlogs, leniency on new public records law". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on June 9, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2020.
  10. ↑ Craver, Kevin P. (August 5, 2010). "Frequent filers weigh in on FOIA". Northwest Herald . Shaw Media . Retrieved November 30, 2020.[ permanent dead link ]
  11. ↑ Slania, John T. (November 17, 2016). "Illinois FOIA Appeals Linger With No End In Sight". Illinois Answers Project. Better Government Association. Archived from the original on March 27, 2023. Retrieved November 20, 2023.
  12. ↑ Dumke, Mick (December 19, 2018). "The Laquan McDonald Shooting Keeps Exposing Critical Flaws in Illinois' Freedom of Information Act". ProPublica . Archived from the original on December 26, 2020. Retrieved December 6, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.