Indian burial ground trope

Last updated

The Indian burial ground trope is frequently used to explain supernatural events and hauntings in American popular culture. [1] The trope gained popularity in the 1980s, making multiple appearances in horror film and television after its debut in The Amityville Horror (1979). Over time the Indian burial ground trope has become viewed as a cliche and in its current usage it commonly functions as a satirical element. [1]

Contents

Background and typology

Many variations of the Indian burial ground trope exist, but generally, the Indian burial ground trope follows two archetypes. [1] The first archetype occurs when a building is erected on an ancient Indian burial ground, and the haunted building is soon filled with evil spirits that terrorize its inhabitants. [1] The Amityville Horror (1979) is the paradigmatic example of this first archetype. The second occurs when a person disturbs a burial ground, and a curse is placed upon them. [1] This curse usually follows them around until they placate the spirits by returning the burial ground to its previous, undisturbed state. [1]

Less frequently in popular culture, the discovery of an Indian burial ground is akin to discovering gold or buried treasure. [1] Such interpretations appear in Our Miss Brooks and Petticoat Junction ; in these representations, the characters are delighted to have stumbled upon Indian burial grounds and ancient artifacts as they could potentially bring revenue or notoriety. [1]

Other variations of the Indigenous burial ground trope include attacks from living Indigenous groups rather than spirits after disturbing the burial ground. [1] This variation is frequently used in the Western film genre including The Searchers (1956). [2]

Indigenous cultural relevance

Indigenous death and burial rituals in the United States

Attitudes towards death and burial practices vary greatly across Indigenous cultures in the United States. Most Native American cultures believe that it is improper to have contact with the remains of the deceased. In some Indigenous cultures, the disruption of a dead body may prevent the spirit from peacefully moving into the afterlife. These views, however, are not exclusive to Indigenous cultures, as multiple other cultures, including Ashkenazi, Thai, and various European cultures, believe that the remains of the dead should be respected and remain undisturbed.

Strict perspectives on death and burials

Traditional Native Hawaiians believe that the spirit of the deceased remains in their bones following their death. [3] The remains of the deceased are believed to be sacred, and great care is taken to respect and honor them. [3] Through their burial, the deceased provided their descendants with spiritual growth and sustenance as their remains became one with the earth. [3] Any disturbance to the burial site is considered greatly disrespectful and is said to bring suffering to the descendants of the deceased. [3]

The Navajo believe a body must be properly buried so that the spirit can move on. [4] If it is buried improperly, the spirit may remain in the physical world. However, contrary to the Indian burial ground trope, the Navajo do not believe that the spirit returns to wreak havoc on the living. [4] Rather, the Navajo want the spirit to move on to that it may find peace in the afterlife. [4]

Relaxed perspectives on death and burials

The Sioux believe that the dead must receive a proper burial to reconnect with the earth and nature. [5] However, spirits are not to be feared, the Sioux will also often seek out guidance from spirits who have moved on. [5]

A unified notion of an "Indian burial ground" or philosophy on death does not exist, and while many tribes condemn the excavation and disruption of burial grounds, the vast majority do not believe in the return of evil spirits. These beliefs have largely been imposed upon Indigenous representations by European settlers as a result of their ignorance and general racism towards Indigenous peoples.

Historic disruption and excavation of indigenous burial sites

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

The destruction of Indigenous heritage is often considered a form of violence against Indigenous peoples. [6] In order to combat the ongoing desecration of Indian burial grounds, Indigenous activists such as Maria Pearson pushed to expand protections of Indian burial grounds and other sites in the late twentieth century. [7] Their efforts culminated in the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of 1990, a bill passed to protect Indigenous cultural sites and respect the human remains and other sacred funerary items of Indigenous peoples. [7] Under NAGPRA, all federally funded government organizations are required to consult with the relevant Indigenous groups before beginning development on sites or after any unexpected cultural items are found. [7] Descendants of the relevant Indigenous groups must prove first their lineage, which has limited the scope and enforceability of NAGPRA. [7]

Archaeology and anthropology

For many years, archaeologists have exploited Indigenous cultural sites without permission of the relevant tribes. [7] Human remains and other cultural items have been excavated and used for research and museum exhibitions. [7] Indigenous groups have argued that such excavations violate their right to self-determination. [8] NAGPRA has limited historians', archaeologists', and researchers' access to Indigenous cultural items; however, there are disputes over which items are covered under NAGPRA. [7] There must be compelling evidence that the objects are culturally relevant or associated with the burial process. [7] This can be challenging due to natural movement of objects over time in addition to the vagueness of the language in NAGPRA. [7]

Development on indigenous lands

Historically, developers in the United States have desecrated traditional Native American land including burial grounds to build homes, businesses, or exploit resources. In recent years, there has been a push to excavate and relocate Indigenous artifacts and bodies before developing on the land.

The Walmart corporation has been consistently criticized for their destruction of Indigenous cultural sites. [9] In 1998, the Wal-mart corporation discovered that they were constructing a new super-center on a mass grave of the 154 Indigenous people. [9] [10] No care was taken towards the preservation of the site or bodies, and the bodies were removed as construction continued. [9] In 2015, 64 Indigenous bodies were found during Wal-mart construction in Hawaii, and the remains waited in a trailer for over 3 years before they were eventually reburied. [9]

Current events

In February 2020, President Donald Trump was criticized for blasting in the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in southwestern Arizona near the border of the United States and Mexico to clear the way for his border wall. [11] The site contains burial grounds and cultural sites belonging to the Tohono O’odham tribe and has been recognized by UNESCO as an ecological preserve. [11] The Trump Administration circumvented NAGPRA protections through federal waivers and did not consult with the Tohono O’odham tribe prior to beginning development. [11] In response to their actions, Ned Norris Jr, a representative of the Tohono O’odham asked "How would you feel if someone brought a bulldozer to your family graveyard and started uprooting the graves there? That is the relationship, the significance, that is the impact that we see happening here in that way." [11] He and other members of the tribe have called for buffer zones that would prevent further development on cultural and burial sites. [11]

Western culture often stereotypes Indigenous cultures as ancient and mystical, making them suitable agents to bring evil spirits, bad luck, and curses. [1] The first appearance of the Indian burial ground trope appeared in the novel The Amityville Horror by Jay Ansen (1977). The Amityville Horror was allegedly based on true events that occurred in Amityville, New York.[ citation needed ] Many of the first appearances of the Indian burial ground trope, such as in The Shining , are only briefly mentioned. [12] However, over time, the trope became more explicit in the plot of movies. [12]

Parody

After gaining popularity in the horror genre in the 1980s, the Indian burial ground trope became a source of irony, often referred to as a dead horse trope. [1]

Lake Shawnee Amusement Park

The abandoned Lake Shawnee Amusement Park Lake Shawnee Amusement Park (10511866324).jpg
The abandoned Lake Shawnee Amusement Park

The Lake Shawnee Amusement Park was founded in 1926 in West Virginia, and was a popular source of entertainment for the local coal mining population. The first known European settlers on that plot of land were the Clay family in late eighteenth century. [13] In 1783, three of the Clay children were killed by a Native American tribe. The Clay family sought vengeance and killed several Native Americans in retaliation. [13] Accidental deaths at the amusement park during the 1950s, and its closure after failing a health inspection, are claimed by paranormal enthusiasts to be the result of a supernatural curse on the land. [13] During the 1990s, workers found Native American artifacts on the site, and archeologists subsequently unearthed a total of 13 Native American bodies. The park now holds guided tours of the allegedly haunted location. [14] [15] [16] [17] The park was featured on several television shows such as Scariest Places on Earth (2002), Most Terrifying Places in America (2010), Most Terrifying Places (2019), [18] and Portals to Hell (2019). [19] .

Criticism

Critics of the Indian burial ground trope argue that it is deeply rooted in stereotypes and misrepresents Indigenous cultures. The Indian burial ground trope reinforces the outdated notion that Indigenous peoples are ancient, mystical, and prone to conjuring bad luck and evil spirits. Furthermore, it misrepresents the historic seizure of Indigenous lands and violence towards Indigenous bodies, artifacts and cultural sites.

Native American scholar Terri Jean speculates that the Indian burial ground trope gained popularity through five theories. [20] Her first theory is simply that the Indian burial ground trope was so successful in its early appearance, that others continued to use it as a reliable and lucrative plot device. [20] The second theory contrasts an Indian burial ground to a marked cemetery; it is much easier to unwittingly stumble upon an unmarked burial ground than a cemetery, so screenwriters use the trope out of convenience. [20] The third theory is that the trope grew out of deeply rooted racism toward Indigenous peoples and the belief that Indigenous people are evil and intruding upon the land that settlers stole from them. [20] The fourth theory states that the people fear the unknown, and since most people knew very little about Indigenous cultures in the twentieth century, the American people became wary and superstitious towards them. [20] The fifth and final theory argues that the Indian burial ground trope grew out of the excessive guilt of white settlers for the destruction of Indigenous peoples and cultures. [20] In this theory, the Indian burial ground trope is a manifestation of the fear that Indigenous groups will seek retribution for the atrocities committed over the past several centuries.  

Other critics warn that stereotyping Indigenous groups results in ignorance and contributes to violence against these groups. [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tohono Oʼodham</span> Native American people of the Sonoran Desert

The Tohono Oʼodham are a Native American people of the Sonoran Desert, residing primarily in the U.S. state of Arizona and the northern Mexican state of Sonora. The federally recognized tribe is known in the United States as the Tohono Oʼodham Nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act</span> 1990 US law protecting Native American remains and artifacts

The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), Pub. L. 101-601, 25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq., 104 Stat. 3048, is a United States federal law enacted on November 16, 1990.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shawnee</span> Indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands

The Shawnee are an Indigenous people of the Northeastern Woodlands. Their language, Shawnee, is an Algonquian language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Akimel O'odham</span> Indigenous tribe in the US and Mexico

The Akimel O'odham, also called the Pima, are a group of Native Americans living in an area consisting of what is now central and southern Arizona, as well as northwestern Mexico in the states of Sonora and Chihuahua. The majority population of the two current bands of the Akimel O'odham in the United States are based in two reservations: the Keli Akimel Oʼodham on the Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) and the On'k Akimel O'odham on the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC).

Indigenous peoples of Arizona are the Native American people of the state of Arizona. These include people that have lived in the region since time immemorial; tribes who entered the region centuries ago, such as the Southern Athabascan peoples; and the Pascua Yaqui who settled Arizona in mass in the early 20th century, though small communities had been in the region for hundreds of years prior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sinagua</span> Pre-Columbian culture in Arizona, US

The Sinagua were a pre-Columbian culture that occupied a large area in central Arizona from the Little Colorado River, near Flagstaff, to the Verde River, near Sedona, including the Verde Valley, area around San Francisco Mountain, and significant portions of the Mogollon Rim country, between approximately 500 and 1425 CE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hia C-eḍ Oʼodham</span> Indigenous tribe in the United States and Mexico

The Hia C-eḍ Oʼodham, also known as Areneños or Sand Papagos, are a Native American peoples whose traditional homeland lies between the Ajo Range, the Gila River, the Colorado River, and the Gulf of California. They are currently unrecognized at both the state and federal level in the United States and Mexico, although the Tohono Oʼodham Nation has a committee for issues related to them and has land held in trust for them. They are represented by a community organization known as the Hia-Ced Oʼodham Alliance. The Hia C-eḍ Oʼodham are no longer nomadic, and the majority today live in or near Ajo, Arizona, or the small settlements of Blaisdell and Dome near Yuma.

Patawomeck is a Native American tribe based in Stafford County, Virginia, along the Potomac River. Patawomeck is another spelling of Potomac.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrol Dew Johnson</span>

Terrol Dew Johnson is a Tohono O'odham basket weaver, sculptor, and health advocate, who promotes Indigenous foods to prevent diabetes.

The Association on American Indian Affairs is a nonprofit human rights charity located in Rockville, Maryland. Founded in 1922, it is dedicated to protecting the rights of Native Americans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caddoan Mississippian culture</span>

The Caddoan Mississippian culture was a prehistoric Native American culture considered by archaeologists as a variant of the Mississippian culture. The Caddoan Mississippians covered a large territory, including what is now Eastern Oklahoma, Western Arkansas, Northeast Texas, Southwest Missouri and Northwest Louisiana of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tohono Oʼodham Community College</span> Tribal college in Sells, Arizona

Tohono Oʼodham Community College (TOCC) is a public tribal land-grant community college in Sells, Arizona. TOCC's student body is 88 percent American Indian/Alaskan Native. Tohono Oʼodham Community College serves approximately 216 students. The college's faculty and staff is 57 percent American Indian, half of whom are Oʼodham.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recognition of Native American sacred sites in the United States</span>

The Recognition of Native American sacred sites in the United States could be described as "specific, discrete, narrowly delineated location on Federal land that is identified by an Indian tribe, or Indian individual determined to be an appropriately authoritative representative of an Indian religion, as sacred by virtue of its established religious significance to, or ceremonial use by, an Indian religion". The sacred places are believed to "have their own 'spiritual properties and significance'". Ultimately, Indigenous peoples who practice their religion at a particular site, they hold a special and sacred attachment to that land sacred land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenville Rancheria of Maidu Indians</span>

The Greenville Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California is a federally recognized tribe of Maidu people in Plumas and Tehama Counties, California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Race in horror films</span>

Depictions of race in horror films has been the subject of commentary. Critics have discussed the representation of race in horror films in relation to the presence of racist ideas, stereotypes and tropes within them. The horror genre has conversely also been used to explore social issues including race, particularly following popularization of social thrillers in the 2010s.

Donna L. Moody was a scholar, author, teacher, public speaker, Abenaki Repatriation and Site Protection Coordinator, and founder of the Winter Center for Indigenous Traditions.

Several Indigenous peoples who live on the United States–Mexico border have objected to the construction of a border wall on their territories and the militarization of the border by the United States government. The US–Mexico border crosses several Indigenous territories and divides these communities. The barrier erected between the United States and Mexico cuts through and/or affects at least 29 Indigenous tribes, which include Kumeyaay Nation and Tohono O'odham.

Funerary archaeology is a branch of archaeology that studies the treatment and commemoration of the dead. It includes the study of human remains, their burial contexts, and from single grave goods through to monumental landscapes. Funerary archaeology might be considered a sub-set of the study of religion and belief. A wide range of expert areas contribute to funerary archaeology, including epigraphy, material culture studies, thanatology, human osteology, zooarchaeology and stable isotope analysis.

Wana the Bear v. Community Construction (1982) was a court case decision by the California Court of Appeals that upheld the non-protected status of Native American burial grounds. The decision effectively allowed for the continued mass desecration of Native American burial sites, including looting, since they were not legally protected as cemeteries. The case is often referred to as a display of ethnocentrism in legal decisions.

Cal NAGPRA was an act created by the state of California which was signed into law in 2001. The act was created to implement the same repatriation expectations for state-funded institutions, museums, repositories, or collections as those federally supported through NAGPRA. Cal NAGPRA also supports non-federally recognized tribes within California that were exempt from legal rights to repatriation under the federal NAGPRA act.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Indian Burial Ground". TV Tropes. Retrieved 2020-10-19.
  2. ↑ Ebert, Roger. "The Searchers movie review & film summary (1956) | Roger Ebert". rogerebert.com/. Retrieved 2020-11-22.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "Native Burials: Human Rights And Sacred Bones". www.culturalsurvival.org. 9 October 2020. Retrieved 2020-11-22.
  4. 1 2 3 Counselor, Michele Meleen. "Native American Death Rituals". LoveToKnow. Retrieved 2020-11-23.
  5. 1 2 "Native American Death Rituals, Funerals & Burial Customs | Cake Blog". www.joincake.com. Retrieved 2020-11-23.
  6. ↑ Nicholas, George; Smith, Claire (2020), Apaydin, Veysel (ed.), "Considering the denigration and destruction of Indigenous heritage as violence", Critical Perspectives on Cultural Memory and Heritage, Construction, Transformation and Destruction, UCL Press, pp. 131–154, ISBN   978-1-78735-485-2, JSTOR   j.ctv13xpsfp.14 , retrieved 2020-11-23
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "NPS Archeology Program: The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)". www.nps.gov. Retrieved 2020-11-22.
  8. ↑ Native Americans and archaeologists : stepping stones to common ground. Swidler, Nina., Society for American Archaeology. Walnut Creek. 1997. ISBN   0-7619-8900-5. OCLC   36246080.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
  9. 1 2 3 4 "Wal-Mart's history of destroying sacred sites". Facing South. 2009-09-03. Retrieved 2020-11-23.
  10. ↑ "Indian Burial Grounds | History Detectives | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 2020-11-23.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 ""A true desecration": Sacred Native American site blasted to build Trump border wall". NBC News. 12 February 2020. Retrieved 2020-11-22.
  12. 1 2 Balanzategui, Jessica (2018-09-15). The Uncanny Child in Transnational Cinema: Ghosts of Futurity at the Turn of the Twenty-first Century. Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv80cc7v.5. ISBN   978-90-485-3779-2. JSTOR   j.ctv80cc7v. S2CID   240225349.
  13. 1 2 3 "Lake Shawnee Abandoned Amusement Park". Mercer County WV. Retrieved 2020-11-22.
  14. ↑ James, Michelle (October 25, 2015). "The Haunted History of Lake Shawnee". The Register-Herald . Beckley, West Virginia. Archived from the original on June 19, 2019.
  15. ↑ "Lake Shawnee Is Closed By Health Department". Beckley Post-Herald . 10 July 1967. p. 6.
  16. ↑ Pitts, Phillip. West Virginia Antiquities Commission, Oct. 1976, Lake Shawnee .
  17. ↑ Kuruvilla, Carol (October 26, 2013). "Abandoned West Virginia amusement park has a bloody history". New York Daily News . Retrieved September 1, 2017.
  18. ↑ "Shadow Factory". Travel Channel. Retrieved 2020-11-22.
  19. ↑ "Lake Shawnee Amusement Park". Travel Channel.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Digging Up the Problem of the Indian Burial Ground Trope". Film School Rejects. 2020-10-15. Retrieved 2020-11-23.
  21. ↑ "Why I Won't Wear War Paint and Feathers in a Movie Again". Time. Retrieved 2020-11-23.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.