Industrial Court of New South Wales

Last updated

Industrial Court of New South Wales
Coat of Arms of New South Wales.svg
Established2 September 1996 (1996-09-02)
Dissolved7 December 2016 (2016-12-07)
Jurisdiction New South Wales, Australia
Location Chief Secretary’s Building, Macquarie Street, Sydney CBD
Authorized by Parliament of New South Wales via the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) and the Industrial Relations Further Amendment (Jurisdiction of Industrial Relations Commission) Act 2009 (NSW)
Appeals to
Appeals from Chief Industrial Magistrate's Court
President
CurrentlyJustice Michael Walton
SinceFebruary 2014 (2014-02)

The Industrial Court of New South Wales was a court within the Australian court hierarchy that exercised the judicial functions of the Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales within the Australian state of New South Wales. The Commission has exclusive jurisdiction in respect of industrial disputes in that state.

Contents

The primary courtrooms were located in the Chief Secretary’s Building in Macquarie Street, Sydney central business district.

The Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales consisted of both judicial and non-judicial members, and its members could exercise the arbitration powers of the commission. However, only the Commission sitting "in Court Session" could exercise the judicial functions of the commission. [1] When the commission sat as the "Commission in Court Session", it was referred to and was known as the "Industrial Court of New South Wales". Only a judicial member could hear matters where such relief was sought from the Court. [2]

Jurisdiction of the Court

The Court had jurisdiction over matters about unfair contracts, prosecutions of offences under the Industrial Relations Act, proceedings for breaches of industrial instruments, appeals against decisions of inferior courts in industrial matters (such as from the Chief Industrial Magistrates Court of New South Wales), and prosecution of occupational health and safety offences under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW). The Court also has jurisdiction over prosecutions for safety related dismissals (see section 23 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) and may grant remedies for safety related dismissals, such as reinstatement and continuity of employment. [2]

The Commission when sitting as the Court was and sat as a superior court of record and is of equivalent status to the Supreme Court of New South Wales and the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales although it does not hold the supervisory jurisdiction held by the Supreme Court of New South Wales. [3] The Court was formerly called the "Industrial Commission of New South Wales in Court Session". The name of the court was changed by the Industrial Relations Amendment Act 2005 (NSW) to the "Industrial Court of New South Wales". [3]

Jurisdictional limits of the Court and the Commission

Persons seeking relief in the Court for unfair contract needed to bring the claim within 2 years and earn under $200,000 per annum (an extension to the time limit of 3 months was available in certain circumstances). [2]

A prosecution for a breach of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) or other occupational health and safety legislation needed to be brought within two years of the breach or two years after the conclusion of a Coronial Inquest by the NSW Coroner.

The Howard Government's WorkChoices reforms to the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), which took effect on 27 March 2007, excluded the operation of the Commission and Court's jurisdictions over matters involving Constitutional Corporations and persons employed by such corporations. The Court's jurisdiction over occupational health and safety matters was preserved and remained valid. [4] [5] The WorkChoices legislation was repealed by the Rudd Government following the enactment of the Fair Work Act 2009 . [6]

Abolition of the Court

In December 2016 the Industrial Court was abolished and its jurisdiction transferred to the Supreme Court of NSW. The sole remaining judicial member, the President Michael Walton, was appointed to the Supreme Court. [7]

See also

Related Research Articles

Australian constitutional law is the area of the law of Australia relating to the interpretation and application of the Constitution of Australia. Legal cases regarding Australian constitutional law are often handled by the High Court of Australia, the highest court in the Australian judicial system. Several major doctrines of Australian constitutional law have developed.

The New South Wales government, also known as the NSW government, is the governing body of New South Wales, Australia. The executive government comprises 11 portfolios, led by a ministerial department and supported by several agencies. There are also a number of independent agencies that fall under a portfolio but remain at arms-length for political reasons, such as the Independent Commission Against Corruption and Electoral Commission. The state Executive Council, consisting of the governor and senior ministers, exercises the executive authority through the relevant portfolio.

The judiciary of Australia comprises judges who sit in federal courts and courts of the States and Territories of Australia. The High Court of Australia sits at the apex of the Australian court hierarchy as the ultimate court of appeal on matters of both federal and State law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of New South Wales</span> Superior court of New South Wales, Australia

The Supreme Court of New South Wales is the highest state court of the Australian State of New South Wales. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the state in civil matters, and hears the most serious criminal matters. Whilst the Supreme Court is the highest New South Wales court in the Australian court hierarchy, an appeal by special leave can be made to the High Court of Australia.

The separation of powers in Australia is the division of the institutions of the Australian government into legislative, executive and judicial branches. This concept is where legislature makes the laws, the executive put the laws into operation, and the judiciary interprets the laws; all independently of each other. The term, and its occurrence in Australia, is due to the text and structure of the Australian Constitution, which derives its influences from democratic concepts embedded in the Westminster system, the doctrine of "responsible government" and the United States version of the separation of powers. However, due to the conventions of the Westminster system, a strict separation of powers is not always evident in the Australian political system, with little separation between the executive and the legislature, with the executive required to be drawn from, and maintain the confidence of, the legislature; a fusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WorkChoices</span> Australian industrial relations law

WorkChoices was the name given to changes made to the federal industrial relations laws in Australia by the Howard government in 2005, being amendments to the Workplace Relations Act 1996 by the Workplace Relations Amendment Act 2005, sometimes referred to as the Workplace Relations Amendment Act 2005, that came into effect on 27 March 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District Court of New South Wales</span> Intermediate court of New South Wales

The District Court of New South Wales is the intermediate court in the judicial hierarchy of the Australian state of New South Wales. It is a trial court and has an appellate jurisdiction. In addition, the Judges of the Court preside over a range of tribunals. In its criminal jurisdiction, the Court may deal with all serious criminal offences except murder, treason and piracy. The Court's civil jurisdiction is generally limited to claims less than A$1,250,000.

Master and Servant Acts or Masters and Servants Acts were laws designed to regulate relations between employers and employees during the 18th and 19th centuries. An 1823 United Kingdom Act described its purpose as "the better regulations of servants, labourers and work people". This particular Act greatly influenced industrial relations and employment law in the United States, Australia, Canada (1847), New Zealand (1856) and South Africa (1856). These Acts are generally regarded as heavily biased towards employers, designed to discipline employees and repress the "combination" of workers in trade unions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Court of Australia</span> Australian superior federal court

The Federal Court of Australia ;)an Australian superior court which has jurisdiction to deal with most civil disputes governed by federal law, along with some summary and indictable criminal matters. Cases are heard at first instance mostly by single judges. In cases of importance, a full court comprising three judges can be convened upon determination by the Chief Justice. The Court also has appellate jurisdiction, which is mostly exercised by a Full Court comprising three judges by a panel of five judges and sometimes by a single judge), the only avenue of appeal from which lies to the High Court of Australia. In the Australian court hierarchy, the Federal Court occupies a position equivalent to the supreme courts of each of the states and territories. In relation to the other courts in the federal stream, it is superior to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for all jurisdictions except family law. It was established in 1976 by the Federal Court of Australia Act.

<i>New South Wales v Commonwealth</i> (2006) Judgement of the High Court of Australia

New South Wales v Commonwealth is a landmark decision of the High Court of Australia, which held that the federal government's WorkChoices legislation was a valid exercise of federal legislative power under the Constitution of Australia. In essence, the majority found the Constitution's corporations power capable of sustaining the legislative framework, while the conciliation and arbitration and territories powers were also seen as supporting parts of the law. Furthermore, the majority also held that the legislation permissibly limited State powers and did not interfere with State constitutions or functioning. A minority dissented.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land and Environment Court of New South Wales</span>

The Land and Environment Court of New South Wales is a court within the Australian court hierarchy established pursuant to the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) to hear environmental, development, building and planning disputes. The Court’s jurisdiction, confined to the state of New South Wales, Australia, includes merits review, judicial review, civil enforcement, criminal prosecution, criminal appeals and civil claims about planning, environmental, land, mining and other legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales</span>

The Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales conciliates and arbitrates industrial disputes, sets conditions of employment and fixes wages and salaries by making industrial awards, approves enterprise agreements and decides claims of unfair dismissal in New South Wales, a state of Australia. The Commission was established with effect from 2 September 1996 pursuant to the Industrial Relations Act 1996.

The Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission, as constituted under the Industrial Relations Act 1979, conciliates and arbitrates industrial disputes, sets conditions of employment and fixes wages and salaries by making industrial awards, approves enterprise agreements and decides claims of unfair dismissal in the State of Western Australia, with respect to those employers not regulated by the Commonwealth of Australia under the Fair Work Act 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New South Wales Court of Appeal</span>

The New South Wales Court of Appeal, part of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, is the highest court for civil matters and has appellate jurisdiction in the Australian state of New South Wales.

The Court of Arbitration was the first court in New South Wales, a state of Australia which dealt exclusively with industrial relation disputes in the early twentieth century. Justice Lance Wright claims that it perhaps was the first court of its type in the world. The court was unique at that time as it was the first court of its type to deal with labour relations between employer and employees on a compulsory basis. Previous arbitration measures between employer and employee had been on a voluntary basis or had been based on the criminal justice system through the use of criminal penalties. The conventional economic model is that both employer and employee enjoy equal bargaining power to set wages and conditions. This asserts that both parties are able to agree on a fair market price for the cost of labour free from distortions. However, where employers or employees group together, these outcomes can be distorted particularly in “boom” or “bust” economic conditions. The purpose of the court was to change the manner in which employers and employees negotiated pay and conditions. It was an attempt to reduce the power imbalances between employer groups or employee unions that arose from using collective bargaining, and the resulting use of that market power to influence wages, and also to reduce the threat of lockout or strikes to achieve those ends.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Industrial Magistrate's Court</span>

The Chief Industrial Magistrate's Court of New South Wales, a division of the Local Court of New South Wales, is a court within the Australian court hierarchy established pursuant to the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000</span> Repealed statute of New South Wales, Australia

The Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 is a repealed statute of New South Wales (NSW). The Act was repealed by the Work Health and Safety Act 2011.

Monika Schmidt was a judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 2009 until 2019, appointed to the Common Law Division, having previously been a judge of the Industrial Court of New South Wales for 16 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution Act 1902</span> Australian state constitution

The Constitution of New South Wales is composed of both unwritten and written elements that set out the structure of Government in the State of New South Wales. While the most important parts are codified in the Constitution Act 1902, major parts of the broader constitution can also be found in:

<i>Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales</i>

Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales is a landmark decision of the High Court of Australia that dealt with the constitutional limits on State Courts' powers and the doctrine of jurisdictional error.

References

  1. Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) s 3
  2. 1 2 3 "Purpose and Functions". Industrial Relations Commission. Government of New South Wales. Archived from the original on 9 February 2015.
  3. 1 2 "Our History". Industrial Relations Commission. Government of New South Wales. Archived from the original on 9 February 2015.
  4. "PM 'knew Work Choices would hurt workers' – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 21 July 2007. Retrieved 20 July 2010.
  5. "Govt downplays Work Choices revelations – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 21 July 2007. Retrieved 20 July 2010.
  6. Hannon, Kate. 2008. "Bell tolls for Howard's Work Choices " In The Canberra Times. Canberra.
  7. Industrial Relations Amendment (Industrial Court) Act 2016 (NSW)

Sources