Justifying Genocide

Last updated
Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler
Justifying Genocide.jpg
First edition
Author Stefan Ihrig
Publication date
2016

Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler is a 2016 book by Stefan Ihrig which explores how violence against the Ottoman Armenians, from the Hamidian massacres to the Armenian genocide, influenced German views and led to the acceptance of genocide as a legitimate "solution" to "problems posed by an unwelcome minority". [1] It discusses how the topic was debated in Germany after World War I and the influence of these debates and perceptions of history on the Holocaust.

Contents

Content

A political cartoon in Kladderadatsch, which depicts British statesman William Ewart Gladstone using first the April Uprising then the Hamidian massacres to drum up support against the Ottoman Empire Gladstone's New Toy.png
A political cartoon in Kladderadatsch , which depicts British statesman William Ewart Gladstone using first the April Uprising then the Hamidian massacres to drum up support against the Ottoman Empire

The book expands on Ihrig's previous book, Atatürk in the Nazi Imagination (2014), [2] and is based on examination of contemporary German publications. [3] [4] Ihrig writes that his book is about "Germany and its road to the Holocaust", [5] [6] and only secondarily about Turks or Armenians. The book covers the period from the 1878 Treaty of San Stefano through World War II; [2] Ihrig argues that the German media took a consistently pro-Turkish line in justifying massacres of Armenians throughout this period. [6]

Ihrig chronicles how the German chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, encouraged the Ottoman rulers resist implementing the Armenian reforms envisioned in the 1878 treaty. [2] Ihrig writes that Bismarck saw the Ottoman Empire as a "land of political opportunity" befitting German interests and tried to keep it intact for that reason. [2] During the 1890s, the German press reported extensively on the Hamidian massacres of Armenians, labeling them "Völkermord" (the German word for genocide) decades before the term genocide was coined in English. [6] In order to its build its relationship with the Ottoman Empire, the German government defended the massacres as justified. By the 1890s, Ihrig finds a consistent anti-Armenianism in the German press (especially right-wing media), which he compares to antisemitism. [3] [6] Anti-Armenian books such as those by Karl May, Hans Barth, and Alfred Körte were also published. [6]

Iconic image of Armenian refugees, taken by German medic Armin Wegner and revealed to the German public in a 1919 lecture Refugees at the Taurus Pass.jpg
Iconic image of Armenian refugees, taken by German medic Armin Wegner and revealed to the German public in a 1919 lecture

During the Armenian genocide, Ihrig states that Germany could have known "everything" about the fate of the Armenians as it was ongoing. [6] However, the German press repeated uncritically denial of the genocide by German officials long after the facts were widely known, as well as justification and rationalization of the killings. [3] Although Ihrig rejects the claim (proposed by Vahakn Dadrian) that the genocide resulted from a joint German–Ottoman decision, [6] Ihrig concludes that Germany made the decision to "sacrifice the Armenians as the price of preserving Ottoman goodwill toward Germany". [7]

Ihrig covers the 1921 trial of Soghomon Tehlirian for the Assassination of Talat Pasha in Berlin, which raised the profile of the genocide in Germany. Many newspapers began to use the word Völkermord or the formula Ausrottung eines Volkes (extermination of a people) in the modern meaning of "genocide", as opposed to the less specific terms of "Armenian Horrors" or "Armenian massacres". [8] [2] However, according to Ihrig, acknowledgment of genocide did not translate into condemnation, instead it led to the victory of the faction that portrayed the genocide as necessary and justified, primarily because the Armenians were judged to have stabbed the Ottoman Empire in the back. [9] [2] [10] For many German nationalists in the Weimar Republic, Ihrig writes, "genocide was a 'reasonable,' 'justifiable,' if not unavoidable cost of doing political and military business in the twentieth century". [11] [2] On the other hand, Ihrig profiles Franz Werfel, Armin Wegner, Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, and Johannes Lepsius, who fought to inform the public about the Armenian plight and help Armenians, and some whom also attempted to ward off the rise of Nazism. [6]

Ihrig considers the Armenian genocide to be the "double original sin" of the twentieth century, first because it happened, and second because it went unpunished; thus it is, according to Ihrig, a sin not only of the perpetrators but also the bystanders. [12] [6] He concludes that "There can be no doubt that the Nazis had incorporated the Armenian Genocide, its 'lessons,' tactics, and 'benefits,' into their own worldview and their view of the new racial order they were building." [13] [10] Although he does not go as far as to state that Nazis were directly inspired by the Armenian Genocide to commit the Holocaust, he does state that they admired the Turkish use of genocide as a tool of national rebirth, creating a "postgenocidal paradise". [3] [2]

Reviews

Kirkus Reviews calls the book "A groundbreaking academic study that shows how Germany derived from the Armenian genocide 'a plethora of recipes' to address its own ethnic problems". [14] Hungarian historian Péter Pál Kránitz states that "Ihrig's findings are significant for international scholars of genocide and the Holocaust". [10] Armenian political scientist Vahram Ter-Matevosyan credits Ihrig with challenging "the deep-seated concepts and approaches about the Armenian Genocide discourse". [6] Vahagn Avedian states that Ihrig conducted "meticulous research" and produced "a highly welcomed contribution to the field of genocide studies". [2] Lawrence Douglas considers the book fascinating, highly readable, and convincing. [1]

German historian Jürgen Zimmerer  [ de ] states that Ihrig's study rests on intentionalist assumptions (that the Holocaust was ideologically based and planned in advance), a theory which is by no means completely accepted among scholars of the Holocaust. Nevertheless, he considers the book "important and inspiring" especially for historians of Germany. [15] According to historian Jo Laycock, Ihrig's book is "the most detailed and wide ranging analysis to date of the evolution of German representations of the Armenians and responses to the Armenian Genocide of 1915". [16]

Awards

The book received the 2017 Dr. Sona Aronian Book Prize for Excellence in Armenian Studies by the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research. [17]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armenian genocide</span> 1915–1917 mass murder in the Ottoman Empire

The Armenian genocide was the systematic destruction of the Armenian people and identity in the Ottoman Empire during World War I. Spearheaded by the ruling Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), it was implemented primarily through the mass murder of around one million Armenians during death marches to the Syrian Desert and the forced Islamization of others, primarily women and children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raphael Lemkin</span> Polish lawyer who coined the term "genocide" (1900–1959)

Raphael Lemkin was a Polish lawyer who is best known for coining the term genocide and initiating the Genocide Convention, an interest spurred on after learning about the Armenian genocide and finding out that no international laws existed to prosecute the Ottoman leaders who had perpetrated these crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guenter Lewy</span> American historian

Guenter Lewy is a German-born American author and political scientist who is a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His works span several topics, but he is most often associated with his 1978 book on the Vietnam War, America in Vietnam, and several controversial works that deal with the applicability of the term genocide to various historical events. Lewy sees the word genocide as an inappropriate label for either Romani genocide or Armenian genocide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armin T. Wegner</span>

Armin Theophil Wegner was a German soldier and medic in World War I, a prolific author, and a human rights activist. Stationed in the Ottoman Empire during World War I, Wegner was a witness to the Armenian genocide and the photographs he took documenting the plight of the Armenians today "comprises the core of witness images of the Genocide."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greek genocide</span> 1913–1922 mass murder and expulsion of the Greek Christian population of the Ottoman Empire

The Greek genocide, which included the Pontic genocide, was the systematic killing of the Christian Ottoman Greek population of Anatolia which was carried out mainly during World War I and its aftermath (1914–1922) on the basis of their religion and ethnicity. It was perpetrated by the government of the Ottoman Empire led by the Three Pashas and by the Government of the Grand National Assembly led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, against the indigenous Greek population of the Empire. The genocide included massacres, forced deportations involving death marches through the Syrian Desert, expulsions, summary executions, and the destruction of Eastern Orthodox cultural, historical, and religious monuments. Several hundred thousand Ottoman Greeks died during this period. Most of the refugees and survivors fled to Greece. Some, especially those in Eastern provinces, took refuge in the neighbouring Russian Empire.

The United Nations War Crimes Commission (UNWCC) initially called the United Nations Commission for the Investigation of War Crimes, was a commission of the United Nations that investigated allegations of war crimes committed by Nazi Germany and the other Axis powers in World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armenian genocide denial</span> Fringe theory that the Armenian genocide did not occur

Armenian genocide denial is the claim that the Ottoman Empire and its ruling party, the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), did not commit genocide against its Armenian citizens during World War I—a crime documented in a large body of evidence and affirmed by the vast majority of scholars. The perpetrators denied the genocide as they carried it out, claiming that Armenians in the Ottoman Empire were resettled for military reasons, not exterminated. In the genocide's aftermath, incriminating documents were systematically destroyed, and denial has been the policy of every government of the Republic of Turkey, as of 2023.

<i>Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung</i> Periodical literature

Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung was a German newspaper that appeared between 1861 and 1945.

Impunity is the ability to act with exemption from punishments, losses, or other negative consequences. In the international law of human rights, impunity is failure to bring perpetrators of human rights violations to justice and, as such, itself constitutes a denial of the victims' right to justice and redress. Impunity is especially common in countries which lack the tradition of rule of law, or suffer from pervasive corruption, or contain entrenched systems of patronage, or where the judiciary is weak or members of the security forces are protected by special jurisdictions or immunities. Impunity is sometimes considered a form of denialism of historical crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fritz Bronsart von Schellendorf</span>

Friedrich (Fritz) Bronsart von Schellendorf was a German officer and politician. He was the chief of Staff of the Ottoman Army and was one of the many German military advisors assigned to the Ottoman Empire. He replaced Otto Liman von Sanders who was assigned to the Aegean region following disagreements with Enver Pasha. He was instrumental drafting initial war plans for the Ottoman Army. Some historians consider Bronsart von Schellendorf to have been complicit in the Armenian genocide. He was an ardent supporter of Hitler during 1930s also.

The Forty Days of Musa Dagh is a 1933 novel by the Austrian-Jewish author Franz Werfel. Based on the events at Musa Dagh in 1915 during the Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire, the book played a role in organizing the Jewish resistance under Nazi rule. It was passed from hand to hand in Jewish ghettos in Nazi-occupied Europe, and it became an example and a symbol for the Jewish underground throughout Europe. The Holocaust scholars Samuel Totten, Paul Bartrop and Steven L. Jacobs underline the importance of the book for many of the ghettos' Jews: "The book was read by many Jews during World War II and was viewed as an allegory of their own situation in the Nazi-established ghettos, and what they might do about it."

Marc David Baer is an historian and professor of International History at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

At the conclusion of the Obersalzberg Speech (1939), German dictator Adolf Hitler likely stated, "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?" The veracity of the quote has been debated by scholars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genocide justification</span> Attempts to claim genocide is a moral action

Genocide justification is the claim that a genocide is morally excusable or necessary, in contrast to genocide denial, which rejects that genocide occurred. Perpetrators often claim that the genocide victims presented a serious threat, meaning that their killing was legitimate self-defense of a nation or state. According to modern international criminal law, there can be no excuse for genocide.

Stefan Ihrig is an academic, author, and speaker. He is professor of history at the University of Haifa and director of the Haifa Center for German and European Studies. His research interests are European and Middle Eastern history, with a focus on media and political and social discourse. His 2014 and 2016 books dealing with German-Turkish history and entanglement have elicited critical praise. He is also an editor of the Journal of Holocaust Research published by the University of Haifa and has contributed articles for HuffPost, Tablet, Haaretz, and History Today, among other publications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armenian genocide and the Holocaust</span> Comparison of genocides

The relationship between the Armenian genocide and the Holocaust has been discussed by scholars. While a direct causal relationship between the Armenian genocide is not proven, it has been suggested that Holocaust perpetrators were inspired by the Ottoman example and the legacy of impunity. Both the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide are considered paradigmatic cases of genocide in the twentieth century.

The terminology of the Armenian genocide is different in English, Turkish, and Armenian languages and has led to political controversies around the issue of Armenian genocide denial and Armenian genocide recognition. Although the majority of historians writing in English use the word "genocide", other terms exist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Germany and the Armenian genocide</span>

During World War I, Imperial Germany was a military ally of the Ottoman Empire, which perpetrated the Armenian genocide. Many Germans present in eastern and southern Anatolia witnessed the genocide, but censorship and self-censorship hampered these reports, while German newspapers reported Turkish denial of the massacres. About 800 German officers and 25.000 German soldiers were an integral part of the Turkish army and belonged to its command and general staff. German officers signed orders that led to deportations of Armenians. Although individual Germans tried to publicize the Armenians' fate or save lives, the German state has been criticized for "extreme moral indifference" to the plight of Armenians and not doing anything to stop the genocide. In 2016, the Bundestag apologized for Germany's "inglorious role" in a resolution recognizing the genocide.

<i>Denial of Violence</i> 2015 book by Fatma Müge Göçek

Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present and Collective Violence Against the Armenians, 1789–2009 is a 2015 book by Turkish sociologist Fatma Müge Göçek which deals with the denial, justification, and rationalization of state-sponsored violence against Armenians in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century, focusing especially on the Armenian genocide and its persistent denial in Turkey. Among the arguments made in the book is that the Armenian genocide was an act of foundational violence that enabled the creation of the Republic of Turkey and its continuing denial is an ideological foundation of the Turkish nation-state. The book was praised by reviewers for its extensive research and methodological innovation, although some noted that it was dense and not easy to read for those not familiar with the topic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assassination of Talaat Pasha</span> 1921 assassination in Berlin, Germany

On 15 March 1921, Armenian student Soghomon Tehlirian assassinated Talaat Pasha—former grand vizier of the Ottoman Empire and the main architect of the Armenian genocide—in Berlin. At his trial, Tehlirian argued, "I have killed a man, but I am not a murderer"; the jury acquitted him.

References

  1. 1 2 "Justifying Genocide by Stefan Ihrig review: Germany's first taste of genocide". The Irish Times. Retrieved 2020-07-22.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Avedian, Vahagn (20 November 2018). "Justifying genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler, by Stefan Ihrig, Cambridge, MA, Harvard, 2016, 460 pp., $35.00 (HC), ISBN 978-0674504790". Nationalities Papers. 46 (3): 532–535. doi:10.1080/00905992.2017.1390980. S2CID   159627934.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Chorbajian, Levon (11 July 2016). "Review Feature - The Armenian Genocide". E-International Relations. Retrieved 21 November 2020.
  4. Schwanitz, Wolfgang G. (January 2017). "Review of Ihrig, Stefan, Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler". H-Soz-u-Kult, H-Review. Retrieved 21 November 2020.
  5. Yenen, Alp (20 December 2017). "Ihrig, Stefan: Justifying genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler" (PDF). Asiatische Studien - Études Asiatiques. 71 (3): 1039–1043. doi:10.1515/asia-2017-0053. S2CID   103441727.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ter-Matevosyan, Vahram (October 2017). "Book Review: Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler". Genocide Studies and Prevention. 11 (2): 106–108. doi: 10.5038/1911-9933.11.2.1482 .
  7. "Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler, by Stefan Ihrig (2016)". notevenpast.org. 22 March 2017. Retrieved 7 March 2021.
  8. Ihrig 2016, p. 271.
  9. Ihrig 2016, p. 273.
  10. 1 2 3 Kránitz, Péter Pál (2016). "Review of Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler". The Hungarian Historical Review. 5 (4): 916–920. ISSN   2063-8647. JSTOR   44390829.
  11. Ihrig 2016, p. 279.
  12. Ihrig 2016, p. 7.
  13. Ihrig 2016, p. 349.
  14. "Justifying Genocide". Kirkus Reviews . Retrieved 20 November 2020.
  15. Zimmerer, Jürgen (December 2018). "Stefan Ihrig. Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler". The American Historical Review. 123 (5): 1777–1778. doi:10.1093/ahr/rhy338.
  16. Laycock, Jo (March 2018). "Justifying Genocide: Germany and the Armenians from Bismarck to Hitler". German History. 36 (1): 116–118. doi:10.1093/gerhis/ghx083.
  17. Contributor, Guest (2017-12-18). "Stefan Ihrig and Abraham Terian Receive NAASR's Aronian Armenian Studies Book Prizes". The Armenian Weekly. Retrieved 2020-07-22.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Further reading