Klaus Werner Wedell

Last updated

Klaus Wedell CBE was a British educational psychologist and innovator of national and international importance in educational psychology and in special educational needs (SEN), with respect to theoretical and conceptual developments, professional practice and policy.

Contents

Early life

Klaus Wedell was born in Dusseldorf, Germany in 1931 and came with his family to Britain as a refugee from Nazi Germany aged seven. [1] He started school in England without speaking English and began a sojourn from place to place and school to school.  The family, classed as ‘enemy aliens’, lived from hand to mouth with acute privations. Eventually in August 1943 circumstances became more stable as they moved to Wistow, a residential training college for Germans preparing to return to Germany to help rebuild the country after the war.  Private funding enabled the teenage Klaus to continue his education at Bryanston School. [2]

From Bryanston, Wedell went on to study Psychology and Philosophy at King's College University of Cambridge (1950–53). [3] [1] During his National Service (1953–55) he served in the British Army in Germany; he wasn’t much good as a tank unit leader due to his disinclination to give orders, but his bilingual skills were put to good use at brigade headquarters. [1] He then undertook his PhD at the University of Bristol, supported by a Spastics Society Studentship, on the perceptuo-motor problems of children with cerebral palsy. [1]

Klaus married Nina (nee Weaver) in 1956, when both were post-graduate students.  They had two children, Stephen (born 1962) and Katherine (born 1964). [1]

Klaus’s family background and the experience of being a refugee both had a powerful influence on his life.  His forebears had a strong vocation to public service: on his father Hans’s side the Jewish Wedells and on his mother Gertrud’s side the Christian Bonhoeffers. [4]

  Work

Policy and Legislation

Consultancies and Development of SEN Provision Worldwide

Organising Education for Diversity and Inclusion

The SENCO Forum

Key Ideas in Wedell's Conceptual Development

Wedell's PhD research was framed within the prevailing model of classification: analysing children's learning difficulties by starting from predetermined classifications of difficulty, located within the child. From this research, Wedell concluded that such classification could not adequately address children's learning needs. In his 1973 book Learning and Perceptuo-motor Disabilities in Children, he expressed frustration with the concept of classifying children with learning disabilities, describing it as 'an exercise of limited value', [19] and instead discussed the importance of the interaction between the learner's strengths and needs and their school and home environment. [20]

From these findings, the concept of 'compensatory interaction' emerged as a model for assessing children's special educational needs. [21] This model moved away from both classifications of learning difficulty and seeing learning difficulties wholly as deficits within the child. Instead, compensatory interaction conceptualised learning difficulties as interactions between strengths and needs within the child and advantages and disadvantages in their environment, considered over time. [5]

Wedell initiated a major change in EP training and practice on the Educational Psychology training course in Birmingham, with trainees going into schools, rather than working in child guidance clinics. The compensatory interaction model required that Educational Psychologists should assess children's learning difficulties and needs within their educational and home settings. [1]

Wedell was concerned with the early identification of children's special educational needs. The work that he and colleagues did in this area indicated the significant difficulty of finding a measure that could predict the educational progress of children with apparently similar problems. [22]

At the Institute of Education, Wedell promoted and refined what he called the 'I and I Strategy' - to investigate and intervene in the individual case': an approach opposed to the use of generalisations and the fitting of pupils to general patterns. What was generally applicable for Wedell was the process of investigation and intervention. The starting point was the learning objective; and the strategy was one of investigating the strengths and needs of the individual and their environment in relation to the learning objective, and in the light of those strengths and needs to find interventions that would work for that individual, rather than applying generalised, ready-made solutions. [11]

Wedell promoted the concept of special educational needs as relative: a learner's needs depend on the learning objectives, and if the objective is changed, the special educational need may change or disappear. Additionally, a learner's difficulties may be relative to their other learning characteristics and their learning environment. [11]

Arising from the principle of inclusion and the recognition of the diversity of learning needs, Wedell became concerned with curriculum modification and systems of organising learning, considering how educational contexts can respond to pupil diversity. . [11] He recognised the complexity and dilemmas of inclusion. [23] [24] He advocated that educational provision should maximise organisational and pedagogical flexibility [23] [24] [1] and recognised that Information Technology could be an instrument in achieving this. [25]

Collaboration was a key concept in all of Wedell's thinking about the delivery of special educational needs provision. The 1981 Education Act required education, health and social services to work together to address the needs of young people with a Statement of Special Educational Need. [26] Wedell not only focused on the practical implications of this requirement but went further. He stressed the need for collaboration at all levels as a basic principle of good practice. For example, at the Institute of Education he collaborated with local authorities in the disbanded ILEA to provide in-service training; he was very active in the SEN Policy Research forum, a broad network of all concerned with SEN, including families, to examine and debate SEN policy issues; and he developed links between statutory, professional, and voluntary organisations, both in lobbying and in service delivery. [11]

Publications

Wedell, K. (1960) ‘The visual perception of cerebral palsied children’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1, pp. 217–27.

Wedell, K. (1964) ‘Some aspects of perceptual-motor development in young children’, in J. Loring (ed.) Learning Problems of the Cerebral Palsied, London: Spastics Society.

Wedell, K. (1970) ‘Diagnosing learning difficulties:  A sequential strategy’, Journal of Learning Difficulties, 3(6), pp. 23–9.

Wedell, K. (1971) ‘Perceptuo-motor factors’, in B. Keogh (ed.) ‘Early Identification of Children with Potential Learning Problems’, Journal of Special Education, 4, pp. 223–31.

Wedell, K. (1973) Learning and Perceptuo-motor Disabilities in Children, London: John Wiley.

Wedell, K. (1978) ‘Early Identification and Compensatory Education’ paper presented at the NATO International Conference on Learning Disorders, Ottawa.

Wedell, K. (1980) ‘Early identification and compensatory interaction’, in R.M. Knights and D.J. Bakker (eds) Treatment of Hyperactive and Learning Disordered Children: Current Research, Baltimore University Park Press

Wedell, K. (1989) ‘Some developments in the concepts and practice of special education’ (unpublished manuscript).

Wedell, K. (1990) ‘The 1988 Act and current principles of special educational needs’ in H. Daniels and J. Ware (eds) Special Educational Needs and the National Curriculum, London: Institute of Education / Kogan Page.

Wedell, K. (1993) ‘Special Needs Education:  The Next 25 Years’, National Commission on Education Briefing, 14, London:  NCE

Wedell, K. (1994) ‘Conclusions’, in I Lund and J. Evans (eds) Allocating Resources for Special Educational Needs Provision, Stafford:  NASEN Enterprises.

Wedell, K. and Raybould, E.C. (1976) ‘The early identification of educationally ‘at risk’ children’, Educational Review, Occasional Publications No. 6.  University of Birmingham.

Wedell, K. and Lambourne, R. (1979) An Enquiry into Psychological Services for Children in England and Wales, Birmingham:  University of Birmingham, Department of Educational Psychology.

Wedell, K. and Lambourne, R. (1979) Psychological Services for Children in England and Wales, Social Science Research Council.

Wedell, K. and Lambourne, R. (1980) ‘Psychological services for children in England and Wales’, DECP Occasional Papers, 4(1) and (2), pp. 1–84

Wedell, K. and Lindsay, G. (1980) ‘Early identification procedures:  What have we learned?’ Remedial Education, 15, pp. 130–5.

Wedell, K. (1995). Making inclusive education ordinary. British Journal of Special Education. [27]

'Points from the SENCo Forum': regular column in the British Journal of Special Education [28] from 1997 to 2021.

Wedell, K. (2005). Dilemmas in the quest for inclusion. British Journal of Special Education. [29]

Wedell, K. (2008). Confusion about inclusion: patching up or system change? British Journal of Special Education. [30]

Awards

Related Research Articles

Educational psychology is the branch of psychology concerned with the scientific study of human learning. The study of learning processes, from both cognitive and behavioral perspectives, allows researchers to understand individual differences in intelligence, cognitive development, affect, motivation, self-regulation, and self-concept, as well as their role in learning. The field of educational psychology relies heavily on quantitative methods, including testing and measurement, to enhance educational activities related to instructional design, classroom management, and assessment, which serve to facilitate learning processes in various educational settings across the lifespan.

Special education is the practice of educating students in a way that accommodates their individual differences, disabilities, and special needs. This involves the individually planned and systematically monitored arrangement of teaching procedures, adapted equipment and materials, and accessible settings. These interventions are designed to help individuals with special needs achieve a higher level of personal self-sufficiency and success in school and in their community, which may not be available if the student were only given access to a typical classroom education.

School psychology is a field that applies principles from educational psychology, developmental psychology, clinical psychology, community psychology, and behavior analysis to meet the learning and behavioral health needs of children and adolescents. It is an area of applied psychology practiced by a school psychologist. They often collaborate with educators, families, school leaders, community members, and other professionals to create safe and supportive school environments.

A reading disability is a condition in which a person displays difficulty reading. Examples of reading disabilities include: developmental dyslexia, And alexia,

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mainstreaming (education)</span> Placing disabled students in regular classrooms

Mainstreaming, in the context of education, is the practice of placing students with special education needs in a general education classroom during specific time periods based on their skills. This means students who are a part of the special education classroom will join the regular education classroom at certain times which are fitting for the special education student. These students may attend art or physical education in the regular education classrooms. Sometimes these students will attend math and science in a separate classroom, but attend English in a general education classroom. Schools that practice mainstreaming believe that students with special needs who cannot function in a general education classroom to a certain extent belong in the special education environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inclusion (education)</span> Where disabled students spend most of their time with non-disabled students

Inclusion in education refers to all students being able to access and gain equal opportunities to education and learning. It arose in the context of special education with an individualized education program or 504 plan, and is built on the notion that it is more effective for students with special needs to have the said mixed experience for them to be more successful in social interactions leading to further success in life. The philosophy behind the implementation of the inclusion model does not prioritize, but still provides for the utilization of special classrooms and special schools for the education of students with disabilities. Inclusive education models are brought into force by educational administrators with the intention of moving away from seclusion models of special education to the fullest extent practical, the idea being that it is to the social benefit of general education students and special education students alike, with the more able students serving as peer models and those less able serving as motivation for general education students to learn empathy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Education (Scotland) Act 2004 is an Act of the Scottish Parliament that received Royal Assent in 2004. It seeks to redefine the law relating to the provision of special education to children with additional needs by establishing a framework for the policies of inclusion and generally practising the "presumption of mainstreaming" in Scottish education. The Act is an attempt to broaden the narrow definition of Special Educational Needs (SEN) which has typically been used to define children with special needs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning disability</span> Range of neurodevelopmental conditions

Learning disability, learning disorder, or learning difficulty is a condition in the brain that causes difficulties comprehending or processing information and can be caused by several different factors. Given the "difficulty learning in a typical manner", this does not exclude the ability to learn in a different manner. Therefore, some people can be more accurately described as having a "learning difference", thus avoiding any misconception of being disabled with a possible lack of an ability to learn and possible negative stereotyping. In the United Kingdom, the term "learning disability" generally refers to an intellectual disability, while conditions such as dyslexia and dyspraxia are usually referred to as "learning difficulties".

Intensive Interaction is an approach for supporting the social inclusion and social communication skill development of people with learning difficulties and/or autism, and other groups of people who have difficulty with social engagement.

A resource room is a separate, remedial classroom in a school where students with educational disabilities, such as specific learning disabilities, are given direct, specialized instruction and academic remediation and assistance with homework, and related assignments as individuals or in groups.

Special educational needs (SEN), also known as special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) in the United Kingdom refers to the education of children who require different education provision to the mainstream system.

Educational neuroscience is an emerging scientific field that brings together researchers in cognitive neuroscience, developmental cognitive neuroscience, educational psychology, educational technology, education theory and other related disciplines to explore the interactions between biological processes and education. Researchers in educational neuroscience investigate the neural mechanisms of reading, numerical cognition, attention and their attendant difficulties including dyslexia, dyscalculia and ADHD as they relate to education. Researchers in this area may link basic findings in cognitive neuroscience with educational technology to help in curriculum implementation for mathematics education and reading education. The aim of educational neuroscience is to generate basic and applied research that will provide a new transdisciplinary account of learning and teaching, which is capable of informing education. A major goal of educational neuroscience is to bridge the gap between the two fields through a direct dialogue between researchers and educators, avoiding the "middlemen of the brain-based learning industry". These middlemen have a vested commercial interest in the selling of "neuromyths" and their supposed remedies.

The Circle of Friends approach is a method designed to increase the socialization and inclusion of a disabled person with their peers. A Circle of Friends consists of a "focus" child, for whom the group was established, six to eight classroom peers, and an adult facilitator who meet once weekly to socialize and work on specific goals. Most available resources about the Circle of Friends approach are geared toward its use with school-aged children with various difficulties.

Academic achievement or academic performance is the extent to which a student, teacher or institution has attained their short or long-term educational goals. Completion of educational benchmarks such as secondary school diplomas and bachelor's degrees represent academic achievement.

The Council for the Registration of Schools Teaching Dyslexic Pupils (CReSTeD) is a charity which maintains a register of schools for dyslexic children in the United Kingdom. The use of upper and lower case letters for the acronym CReSTeD is an attempt to graphically represent the difficulties a person with dyslexia experiences when trying to read.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Special Assistance Program (Australian education)</span>

The development and implementation of the Special Assistance Program in Victorian Primary Schools during the period 1979 - 1982 constituted the most significant innovation in the provision of special education services to children experiencing learning difficulties and in addressing declining literacy and numeracy standards. Up until the political directive to initiate this program was given, there had been no policy within the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development directing Principals of Primary Schools to develop special programs for pupils at risk of illiteracy and innumeracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel Sobel</span> Educational consultant

Daniel Sobel FRSA is a consultant in the field of Inclusion (education), a teacher and mentor at Immanuel College, Bushey, and a SENCO and assistant head at King Solomon High School. He began working part-time as a freelance consultant on inclusion for the Borough of Redbridge, promoting good practice through his articles. In 2014, he established the company Inclusion Expert to continue this work.

<i>How the West Indian Child Is Made Educationally Sub-normal in the British School System</i> 1971 book on racism and inequality in British education

How the West Indian Child Is Made Educationally Sub-normal in the British School System: The Scandal of the Black Child in Schools in Britain is a non-fiction book by Grenadian author Bernard Coard published in May 1971 by New Beacon Books in the United Kingdom. In the book, Coard examines educational inequality and institutional racism in the British educational system through the lens of the country's "educationally subnormal" (ESN) schools—previously called "schools for the mentally subnormal"—which disproportionately and wrongly enrolled Black children, especially those from the British Caribbean community. These students rarely advanced out of ESN schools and suffered educationally and economically. Coard also intentionally made a "critical decision" to write specifically for an audience of Black parents.

Rita Ruth Jordan is an academic and researcher in the field of autism. She worked with children with special educational needs and started training programmes for their parents before moving into academia.

Equity and inclusion in education refers to the principle or policy that provides equal access for all learners to curriculum and programming within an educational setting. Some school boards have policies that include the terms inclusion and diversity. Equity is a term sometimes confused with equality. Equity and inclusion policy provide a framework for educators and academic administrators that guides training and delivery of instruction and programming. School boards use equity and inclusion principles to promote the use of resources that reflect the diversity of students and their needs.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "Klaus Wedell HonFBPsS CBE 1931-2022". BPS. Retrieved 25 May 2023.
  2. Wedell, Gertrud; Wedell, Hans (2008). A Memoir of Troubled Times. London: New European Publications Ltd. pp. 80–133. ISBN   9781872410692.
  3. 1 2 Pyke, Nicholas (26 May 1995). "Academics to retire". TES. Archived from the original on 29 April 2023. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  4. Wedell, Gertrud; Wedell, Hans (2008). A Memoir of Troubled Times. London: New European Publications Ltd. pp. 1–7. ISBN   9781872410692.
  5. 1 2 "Klaus Wedell HonFBPsS CBE 1931-2022". BPS. Retrieved 25 May 2023.
  6. 1 2 Lunt, Ingrid; Norwich, Brahm; Varma, Ved (1995). Psychology and Education for Special Needs. Aldershot: Arena. p. 230. ISBN   9781857423068.
  7. "Klaus Wedell HonFBPsS CBE 1931-2022". BPS. Retrieved 25 May 2023.
  8. Wedell, Klaus; Lambourne, R (1980). "Psychological Services for Children in England and Wales". DECP Occasional Papers. 4 (1 and 2): 1–84.
  9. Lunt, Ingrid; Norwich, Brahm; Varma, Ved (1995). Psychology and Education for Special Needs. Aldershot: Arena. p. 231. ISBN   9781857423068.
  10. Lunt, Ingrid; Evans, Jennifer; Norwich, Brahm; Wedell, Klaus (1994). Working Together: Inter-school Collaboration for Special Needs. London: David Fulton. ISBN   978-1853463013.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lunt, Ingrid; Norwich, Brahm; Varma, Ved (1995). Psychology and Education for Special Needs. Aldershot: Arena. pp. 229–239. ISBN   1857423062.
  12. Lindsay, Geoff; Norwich, Brahm (8 January 2023). "Klaus Wedell - Tribute". European Journal of Special Needs Education. 38: 151–153. doi:10.1080/08856257.2022.2159274.
  13. Ireson, Judith; Evans, Peter; Redmond, Patrick; Wedell, Klaus (1989). "Developing the Curriculum for Children with Learning Difficulties: towards a grounded model". British Education Research Journal. 15 (2): 141–154. doi:10.1080/0141192890150204.
  14. Ireson, Judith; Evans, Peter; Redmond, Patrick; Wedell, Klaus (1992). "Developing the Curriculum for Pupils Experiencing Difficulties in Learning in Ordinary Schools: a systematic, comparative analysis". British Educational Research Journal. 18 (2): 155–173. doi:10.1080/0141192920180205.
  15. Parker, Beverley; Bowell, Brian (19 December 2006). "Exploiting computer-mediated communication to support in-service professional development: the SENCO experience". Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education. 7 (2): 229–246. doi:10.1080/14759399800200035.
  16. Wedell, Klaus; Stevens, Chris; Waller, Terry; Matheson, Lydia (December 1997). "SENCos sharing questions and solutions: How to make a more convenient phone call". British Journal of Special Education. 24 (4): 167–170. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00036.
  17. Wedell, Klaus (October 2021). "Points from the SENCo-Forum". British Journal of Special Education. 48 (3): 393–396. doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12378.
  18. "Written Evidence from SENCo Forum". committees.parliament.uk. 2014.
  19. Wedell, Klaus (1973). Learning and Perceptuo-motor Disabilities in Children. London: John Wiley and Sons. p. 4. ISBN   0471924423.
  20. Wedell, Klaus (1973). Learning and Perceptuo-motor Disabilities in Children. London: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 114–119. ISBN   0471924423.
  21. Lunt, Ingrid; Norwich, Brahm; Varma, Ved (1995). Psychology and Education for Special Needs. Aldershot: Arena. pp. 17–19. ISBN   9781857423068.
  22. Lunt, Ingrid; Norwich, Brahm; Varma, Ved (1995). Psychology and Education for Special Needs. Aldershot: Arena. p. 8. ISBN   1857423062.
  23. 1 2 Wedell, Klaus (2005). "Dilemmas in the Quest for Inclusion". British Journal of Special Education. 32 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1111/j.0952-3383.2005.00363.x.
  24. 1 2 Wedell, Klaus (2008). "Confusion about Inclusion: patching up or system change?". British Journal of Special Education. 35 (3): 127–135. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00386.x.
  25. Wedell, K. (1993) 'Special Needs Education: The Next 25 Years' Briefing no.14 for the Paul Hamlyn Foundation National Commission on Education London: Heinemann
  26. "Education Act 1981". Legislation.gov.uk. 1981.
  27. Wedell, Klaus (1995). "Making inclusive education normal". British Journal of Special Education. 22 (3). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8578.1995.tb00914.x . Retrieved 23 July 2020.
  28. Wedell, Klaus (1997–2021). "Points from the SENCo Forum". British Journal of Special Education.
  29. Wedell, Klaus (2005). "Dilemmas in the quest for inclusion". British Journal of Special Education. 32 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1111/j.0952-3383.2005.00363.x . Retrieved 23 July 2020.
  30. Wedell, Klaus (2008). "INCLUSION". British Journal of Special Education. 35 (3): 127–135. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00386.x. S2CID   144272370 . Retrieved 23 July 2020.
  31. "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_New_Year_Honours".{{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)