Knowledge and the Sacred

Last updated
Knowledge and the Sacred
Author Seyyed Hossein Nasr
LanguageEnglish
Subject Perennial philosophy, Sufism
Publisher Edinburgh University Press
Publication date
1981
Media typePrint
Pages341

Knowledge and the Sacred is a 1981 book by the Iranian philosopher Seyyed Hossein Nasr. It was originally presented as his Gifford Lectures, which he delivered in 1981. [1] [2] The book is an exposition of perennial philosophy and has been described as a summa of the traditional perspective. [3] It reflects Nasr's desire to revive what he refers to as the sacred quality of knowledge as opposed to knowledge based on sense perception and reason. [4] [2]

Contents

History

Nasr was the first Muslim and the first non-Westerner to deliver the Gifford Lectures. [5] He received his invitation to deliver the lectures immediately before the Iranian revolution of 1979. [6] However, Nasr was forced into exile as a result of the revolution, and he lost both his prepared lecture notes and his library. He first feared he would have to cancel the event, but he chose to honor his commitment and in four months produced the substance of his lectures. [7] Nasr eventually delivered the lectures at the University of Edinburgh in 1981, [8] which were published by Edinburgh University Press the same year as Knowledge and the Sacred. [9] [10]

Content

The book opens with a chapter on what Nasr refers to as the desacralization of knowledge, arguing that knowledge has become cut off from its divine source—God—and that there is a need for its resacralization. The next chapter deals with the idea of Tradition from the viewpoint of perennial philosophy, defining it as "truths or principles of a divine origin, revealed or unveiled to mankind... through various figures envisaged as messengers, prophets, avataras, the Logos, or other transmitting agencies, along with all the ramifications and applications of these principles in different realms, including law and social structure, art, symbolism, the sciences, and embracing of course Supreme Knowledge along with the means of its attainment." [11] The third chapter of the book concentrates on the West's rediscovery of the sacred and revival of tradition. In the following chapter, Nasr develops his notion of scientia sacra , defining it as “that sacred knowledge which lies at the heart of every revelation”. [12] Scientia sacra or sacred science draws on two very distinct sources, revelation and intellection, in contrast to the sciences based on sense perception and reason. [13] Nasr shifts his focus in the fifth chapter to what he refers to as the pontifical and Promethean man, positing two opposing conceptions of man. Pontifical man, for Nasr, is a divine representative who acts as a link between heaven and earth. Promethean man, on the other hand, represents an earthly being who has forgotten his divine purpose. [14]

In the chapter titled The Cosmos as Theophany, Nasr describes the cosmos as "a manifestation of the Ultimate Reality", [15] and “a theatre in which are reflected the Divine Names and Qualities”, [14] saying that the cosmos is “a crypt through which man must journey to reach the Reality beyond cosmic manifestation”. [14] He says that modern science embraces the idea of a "single level of reality" and calls for the restoration of traditional cosmology, which maintains a hierarchy of levels of existence and provides "spiritual maps" that "relate as much to man's inner being as they do to his outside world". [14] Nasr turns to concepts of time and eternity in the seventh chapter, offering various perspectives on the relationship between time and eternity. [15] In chapter eight, Nasr discusses traditional art, describing it as "a source of both knowledge and grace". Traditional art, in Nasr's words, “forges and forms an ambiance in which its truths are reflected everywhere, in which men breathe and live in a universe of meaning in conformity with the reality of the tradition in question”. [16] Chapter Nine of the book offers a comparative study of different religious traditions. [15] In the final chapter of the book, Knowledge of the Sacred as Deliverance, Nasr places his emphasis on "realized knowledge" as opposed to theoretical knowledge. According to Nasr, realized knowledge "concerns not only the intelligence but also the will and the whole psyche", and its attainment “requires the acquisition of spiritual virtues, which is the manner in which man participates in that truth which is itself suprahuman”. [16]

Themes

According to Nicholas Heer, the main argument Nasr makes in these lectures, which he explores in great length, is that while sciences based on sense perception and reason may be utilized to learn about physical reality, knowledge of the ultimate reality or God can only be obtained through what he refers to as scientia sacra or sacred knowledge. [2] For Gai Eaton, Knowledge and the Sacred can be "described as a Summa of the “traditional” perspective as it relates to the modern “desacralization” of knowledge, the rediscovery of the Sacred, Scientia sacra, man as khalifatullāh contrasted with man as usurper, the cosmos regarded as a theophany, eternity and the temporal order, traditional art, the “multiplicity of sacred forms” and, finally, knowledge of the Sacred as the path to “deliverance”." [3]

Reception

According to the Dictionary of Literary Biography, Nasr's Gifford Lectures "signalled one of the first recognitions of traditional philosophy by mainstream academia". [17] In the volume of the Library of Living Philosophers devoted to Nasr's life and thought, Wolfgang Smith writes: "For the first time in modern history, I would venture to say, the undistorted and unadulterated voice of the perennial and universal tradition could be heard within the prestigious halls of academe." [17] Other academics, the Dictionary of Literary Biography notes, have not always responded favourably to that voice. [17] The book drew criticism from advocates of rationalism and empiricism. According to Ioan Petru Culianu, the thesis it relies on "cannot be validated (or falsified) in any way," adding that it is "meant for a pious public already convinced of the truth and importance of Nasr's message" and that "it remains a conviction only for those of us who are not spoiled by “rationalism and empiricism” to such an extent as to need some form of demonstration." [18] Thomas Dean states in a review of the book that traditionalism, upon which its thesis is built, presents a "methodological impasse." The criticism of its thesis, in Dean's opinion, may be dismissed as "that modern rebellion against tradition". Because, according to Nasr, individuals who lack intellectual intuition are unable to evaluate the merit of such work. [5] The same criticism is made by Mehdi Aminrazavi, who argues, referring to Nasr's critics, that his thesis is "non-verifiable" in that it presents "esoteric truth claims", adding that the system it relies upon is "self-referential" because "its truth value depend[s] upon the system itself". [17] For this, Aminrazavi claims that Nasr's "opponents" believe it is difficult to have a meaningful philosophical dialogue with Nasr. [17]

The work, on the other hand, was highly praised by those who favor spiritual knowledge. Nicholas Heer, for example, writes: "[R]eaders, imbued with modern values and modern points of view, may find in these lectures doctrines which may to them appear novel, strange, and even bizarre and outlandish, worthy only of outright rejection. Regardless of what one’s reaction to these lectures may be, they constitute without question a learned and eloquent vindication and apology for a point of view that has long been in disfavor." [19] Adnan Aslan echoed the same view, saying that "This magnum opus when properly understood and assimilated, is indeed able to evoke an intellectual transformation. It means more than it says directly: it is written in a fashion which communicates not only the domain of reason but also of ‘spirit’. Hence it is not surprising to see that those who are not accustomed to communicate at such a level often fail to grasp the message of the book." [8] Huston Smith, an influential scholar of religious studies, writes:

As for the book at hand, if its author is a phenomenon, this latest book is an event... The 1981 Gifford Lectures are unique in this series in being the first to be delivered by an Oriental. If we are looking for clear signs of a new day, one in which the West is seriously trying to globalize its outlook, here is one that can be pinpointed. Looking back on Knowledge and the Sacred, intellectual historians may one day rank it with William of Moerbeke's Latin translations of Aristotle in the thirteenth century, Marsiglio Ficino's of Plato in the fifteenth, or D.T. Suzuki's 1927 Essays in Zen Buddhism as a landmark showing that a new stage in cross-cultural understanding has been achieved. [20]

—  Huston Smith, Review of Knowledge and the Sacred, 1984

Gai Eaton, in a similar vein, writes:

Seyyed Hossein Nasr has presented, eloquently and against a background of great erudition, the stark contrast between, on the one hand, the traditional view of the nature of things and of man’s destiny and, on the other, the secular fragmented ideologies current in our time. In doing so he has offered his readers a plain choice between two entirely different paths leading to entirely different goals. Even those who have no hesitation in supposing that everything that was believed or thought until recent times is now obsolete will nonetheless be obliged to hesitate and to consider whether there may not be a genuine and viable alternative to the cul-de-sac in which modern man finds himself imprisoned. To be aware of this alternative is to be aware of hope and to discover, beyond the narrow alleyways, an open landscape which invites our entry. [21]

—  Gai Eaton, Knowledge and the Sacred: Reflections on Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s Gifford Lectures , 1983

Victor Danner writes in a review of the book that "It is a work with magnificent sweep both in a philosophical and historical sense, revealing a universality of thought that only a handful of contemporary thinkers of the East or the West have mastered". [22] According to Gerald Largo, Nasr "has contributed an indispensable unified effort to retrieve the sapiential perspective which he articulates so brilliantly and clearly. The copious footnotes and the index invite us to study this book and to rethink the landscape of religious studies from the perspective of the sapiential view which lies at its heart." [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seyyed Hossein Nasr</span> Iranian philosopher

Seyyed Hossein Nasr is an Iranian philosopher and University Professor of Islamic studies at George Washington University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frithjof Schuon</span> Swiss philosopher, poet and painter (1907-1998)

Frithjof Schuon was a Swiss metaphysician of German descent, belonging to the Perennialist or Traditionalist School of thought. He was the author of more than twenty works in French on metaphysics, spirituality, the religious phenomenon, anthropology and art, which have been translated into English and many other languages. He was also a painter and a poet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Traditionalist School (perennialism)</span> Perennial philosophy

The Traditionalist or Perennialist School is a group of 20th- and 21st-century thinkers who believe in the existence of a perennial wisdom or perennial philosophy, primordial and universal truths which form the source for, and are shared by, all the major world religions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muhammad Husayn Tabatabai</span> Iranian scholar and philosopher (1903–1981)

Muhammad Husayn Tabataba'i or Sayyid Mohammad Hossein Tabataba'i was an Iranian scholar, theorist, philosopher and one of the most prominent thinkers of modern Shia Islam. He is perhaps best known for his Tafsir al-Mizan, a twenty-seven-volume work of tafsir, which he produced between 1954 and 1972. He is commonly known as Allameh Tabataba'i and the Allameh Tabataba'i University in Tehran is named after him.

Henry Corbin was a French philosopher, theologian, and Iranologist, professor of Islamic studies at the École pratique des hautes études. He was influential in extending the modern study of traditional Islamic philosophy from early falsafa to later and "mystical" figures such as Suhrawardi, Ibn Arabi, and Mulla Sadra Shirazi.

Iranian philosophy or Persian philosophy can be traced back as far as to Old Iranian philosophical traditions and thoughts which originated in ancient Indo-Iranian roots and were considerably influenced by Zarathustra's teachings. According to the Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, the chronology of the subject and science of philosophy starts with the Indo-Iranians, dating this event to 1500 BC. The Oxford dictionary also states, "Zarathustra's philosophy entered to influence Western tradition through Judaism, and therefore on Middle Platonism."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Chittick</span> American philosopher, writer and translator

William C. Chittick is an American philosopher, writer, translator and interpreter of classical Islamic philosophical and mystical texts. He is best known for his work on Rumi and Ibn 'Arabi, and has written extensively on the school of Ibn 'Arabi, Islamic philosophy, and Islamic cosmology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Walayah</span> Guardianship in Islam

Welayah or Walaya is a general concept of the Islamic faith and a key word in Shia Islam that refers, among other things, to the nature and function of the Imamate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hadi Sabzavari</span> Iranian philosopher, mystic theologian and poet

Hadi Sabzavari or Hajj Molla Hadi Sabzavari was an Iranian philosopher, mystic theologian and poet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecotheology</span> Theological reflection on the environment

Ecotheology is a form of constructive theology that focuses on the interrelationships of religion and nature, particularly in the light of environmental concerns. Ecotheology generally starts from the premise that a relationship exists between human religious/spiritual worldviews and the degradation or restoration and preservation of nature. It explores the interaction between ecological values, such as sustainability, and the human domination of nature. The movement has produced numerous religious-environmental projects around the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gai Eaton</span> Islamic scholar, writer and diplomat

Charles le Gai Eaton was a British diplomat, writer, historian, and Sufi Islamic scholar.

Resacralization is the process of reviving religion or restoring spiritual meanings to various domains of life and thought. It has been termed as the "alter ego" of secularization, which is "a theory claiming that religion loses its holds in modern society". The term rescralization has a variety of connotations in sociology of religion and "very largely draws its meaning" from secularization thesis. According to this viewpoint, religion and spiritual values continue to play an important role in both the private and public realms. Empirical evidence suggests that the world is undergoing a rescralization since religions are gaining ground in contemporary social and political spheres.

The Primordial Tradition is a school of religious philosophy with origins in perennialism, or perennial philosophy, which is in turn a development of the prisca theologia of the Middle Ages. The Primordial Tradition seeks to establish a fundamental origin of religious belief in all authentic religious teachings, adhering to the principle that universal truths are a cross-cultural phenomenon and transcendent of their respective traditions, mythologies, and religious beliefs.

Illuminationism, also known as Ishrāqiyyun or simply Ishrāqi is a philosophical and mystical school of thought introduced by Shahab al-Din Suhrawardi in the twelfth century, established with his Kitab Hikmat al-Ishraq, a fundamental text finished in 1186. Written with influence from Avicennism, Peripateticism, and Neoplatonism, the philosophy is nevertheless distinct as a novel and holistic addition to the history of Islamic philosophy.

In traditionalist philosophy, desacralization of knowledge or secularization of knowledge is the process of separation of knowledge from its divine source—God or the Ultimate Reality. The process marks a paradigmatic shift in understanding of the concept of knowledge in the modern period. It has rejected divine revelations as well as the idea of spiritual and metaphysical foundations of knowledge, confining knowledge to empirical data and reason alone. Although it is a recurrent theme among the writers of the Traditionalist school that began with René Guénon, a French mystic and intellectual who earlier spoke of "the limitation of knowledge to its lowest order", the process of desacralization of knowledge was most notably surveyed, chronicled and conceptualized by the Iranian philosopher Seyyed Hossein Nasr in his 1981 Gifford Lectures that were later published as Knowledge and the Sacred.

In perennial philosophy, scientia sacra or sacred science is a form of sacred knowledge that lies at the heart of both divine revelations and traditional sciences. It recognizes sources of knowledge other than those recognized by modern epistemology, such as divine revelations and intellectual intuition, the latter of which is considered a supra-rational form of knowledge based on the human intellect. Scientia sacra embodies principles and doctrines derived from reason, revelation and intellectual intuition, with the conviction that these sources of knowledge can be reconciled without conflict in a hierarchical order and employed in the human quest to understand different orders of reality. It views the universe as a unified reality centered on God—the Ultimate Reality—whose knowledge is beyond the reach of sense perception and reason. This notion may be traced back to traditional cultures and civilizations, particularly Islamic tradition, which was primarily conceptualized in contemporary language by the Iranian philosopher Seyyed Hossein Nasr in his book Knowledge and the Sacred, originally published in 1981, containing his Gifford Lectures delivered that same year.

In perennial philosophy, tradition means divinely ordained truths or principles revealed or unveiled to mankind, and refers to their implications and applications in different areas of human life and thought. Traditionalists employ the term to refer to immutable principles—the sophia perennis or primordial wisdom—that are rooted in the Divine Center, as opposed to the term "modern," or "modernity," which is divorced and disconnected from the reality of God or the Absolute Truth. The term "tradition" is also used synonymously with revelation, and it encompasses all forms of philosophy, art, and culture that are influenced by it. Although the term has been used in relation to perennial philosophy since René Guénon, and was further developed by his adherents, including Ananda Coomaraswamy and Frithjof Schuon, it was most notably conceptualized by the Iranian philosopher Seyyed Hossein Nasr, who credited Guénon for his idea of tradition.

In traditionalist philosophy, pontifical man is a divine representative who serves as a bridge between heaven and earth. Promethean man, on the other hand, sees himself as an earthly being who has rebelled against God and has no knowledge of his origins or purposes. This concept was notably developed in contemporary language by the Iranian philosopher Seyyed Hossein Nasr.

Resacralization of nature is a term used in environmental philosophy to describe the process of restoring the sacred quality of nature. The primary assumption is that nature has a sanctified aspect that has been lost in modern times as a result of the secularization of contemporary worldviews. These secular worldviews are said to be directly responsible for the spiritual crisis in "modern man", which has ultimately resulted in the current environmental degradation. This perspective emphasizes the significance of changing human perceptions of nature through the incorporation of various religious principles and values that connect nature with the divine. The Iranian philosopher Seyyed Hossein Nasr first conceptualized the theme of resacralization of nature in contemporary language, which was later expounded upon by a number of theologians and philosophers including Alister McGrath, Sallie McFague and Rosemary Radford Ruether.

In traditionalist philosophy, resacralization of knowledge is the reverse of the process of secularization of knowledge. The central premise is that knowledge is intimately connected to its divine source—God or the Ultimate Reality—which has been severed in modern times. The process of resacralization of knowledge seeks to reinstate the role of intellect above and beyond that of reason, as well as to revive the role of traditional metaphysics in acquiring knowledge—especially knowledge of God—by drawing on sacred traditions and sacred science that uphold divine revelations and the spiritual or gnostic teachings of all revealed religions. Iranian philosopher Seyyed Hossein Nasr elaborated on the process of resacralization of knowledge in his book Knowledge and the Sacred, which was presented as Gifford Lectures in 1981.

References

  1. ↑ Eaton 1983, p. 1.
  2. 1 2 3 Heer 1993, p. 144.
  3. 1 2 Eaton 1983, p. 3.
  4. ↑ Eaton 1983, pp. 3, 4.
  5. 1 2 Dean 1984, p. 222.
  6. ↑ Nasr 2000, p. 77.
  7. ↑ Smith 1984, pp. 112–113.
  8. 1 2 Aslan 1998, p. 21.
  9. ↑ Allen 2003, p. 195.
  10. ↑ Raschid 1983, p. 155.
  11. ↑ Eaton 1983, p. 2.
  12. ↑ Eaton 1983, p. 6.
  13. ↑ Heer 1993, p. 145.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Eaton 1983, p. 7.
  15. 1 2 3 Heer 1993, p. 148.
  16. 1 2 Eaton 1983, p. 9.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Allen 2003, p. 197.
  18. ↑ Culianu 1992, p. 284.
  19. ↑ Heer 1993, p. 150.
  20. ↑ Smith 1984, p. 111.
  21. ↑ Eaton 1983, p. 10.
  22. ↑ Danner 1982, p. 248.
  23. ↑ Largo 1982, p. 221.

Sources


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.