Kremen v. Cohen

Last updated

Kremen v. Cohen
Seal of the United States Courts, Ninth Judicial Circuit.svg
Court United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
ArguedAugust 13, 2002
DecidedJuly 25, 2003
Citation(s)337 F.3d 1024
Holding
The domain name for a website is an item of property that must be purchased and sold per established contract law, and which can be stolen under criminal law.
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Alex Kozinski, M. Margaret McKeown
Case opinions
MajorityAlex Kozinski
Keywords
domain names, contract law, criminal law

Kremen v. Cohen, 337 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir., 2003), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The ruling was an important early cyberlaw precedent, determining that an Internet domain name is an item of property that can be bought, sold, and stolen.

Contents

Facts

Internet entrepreneur Gary Kremen (who later founded Match.com and Clean Power Finance) registered the domain name sex.com with Network Solutions for a nominal fee in 1994. At the time he did not develop a website under that name, and instead decided to focus on building a business at Match.com. [1]

Stephen M. Cohen, who had recently completed a prison sentence after being convicted of fraud, envisioned that a website called "sex.com" could generate significant advertising revenues. When Cohen found that the domain name had already been registered by someone else, he embarked on an effort to acquire it fraudulently. [2] In 1995, Cohen sent a letter to Network Solutions claiming to be a representative of Kremen's company and falsely stating that Kremen had been fired from the firm. Cohen in turn suggested that Network Solutions transfer ownership of the sex.com domain name to himself, because Kremen had apparently abandoned his ownership and Cohen now (supposedly) represented the owning firm. [3]

Network Solutions took Cohen's fraudulent letter at face value, and did no due diligence to find errors in Cohen's reasoning or to contact Kremen to verify that he had abandoned the domain name. Network Solutions then transferred ownership to Cohen. When Kremen learned of the ruse and contacted Network Solutions, he was told that the transfer was complete and he was no longer the rightful owner of the domain name. [1]

Cohen then developed a website called sex.com and quickly generated millions of dollars in revenues. [3] In 1998 Kremen filed suit against both Cohen and Network Solutions for fraud.

District court proceedings

The case was first heard at the District Court for the Northern District of California. [4] Kremen contended that Cohen and Network Solutions had violated several provisions of contract law, including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, and conspiracy to convert ownership of property. Network Solutions requested summary judgment, claiming that it had been deceived by Cohen and had no responsibility to Kremen. [4]

The district court determined that Network Solutions had not committed fraud because as the provider of a basic service to register domain names upon request, there had been no actual contract when Kremen originally registered sex.com. This also absolved Network Solutions from fiduciary responsibility toward Kremen. On the matter of conspiracy to convert the ownership of property, the district court noted that, at the time, there was no settled law on whether a domain name was an item of intangible property that could be stolen. That question was rendered moot by this interpretation. Finally, as a party that was allegedly deceived by Cohen's fraudulent actions, Network Solutions had not committed negligent misrepresentation itself. Thus, the company's request for summary judgment was granted and it was absolved from direct responsibility for the fraud committed against Kremen. [4]

In a separate proceeding, the district court ruled that Cohen had committed fraud, and rendered his ownership of sex.com to be null and void because he had acquired the domain name via a fraudulent letter to Network Solutions. Based on calculations of revenues that Kremen could have made if he had developed his own website called sex.com, he was awarded $40 million in compensatory damages and another $25 million in punitive damages. [2] [5]

Cohen appealed the district court ruling in which he was ordered to pay damages to Kremen, but his request was rejected by the Ninth Circuit in 2003 and he was again ordered to pay Kremen the grand total of $65 million. [6] Meanwhile Kremen, despite winning a substantial monetary award against Cohen, appealed the district court ruling in which Network Solutions was absolved of liability.

Circuit court opinion

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the lower court's decision in favor of Network Solutions. [1] The circuit court upheld most of the judgment, except on the matter of conversion of ownership of the domain name. Whereas the lower court had concluded that the law of domain names as intangible property was unsettled and this justified dismissing the complaint against Network Solutions, the circuit court held that a solution could be found in the common law of contracts. Under this interpretation, Network Solutions had violated contract law by giving away Kremen's property without due diligence and carelessly accepting Cohen's fraudulent representations. [1] This matter was then remanded to the district court to determine if Network Solutions should pay monetary damages to Kremen; [1] this matter was eventually settled out of court.

Impact and subsequent events

Kremen v. Cohen, and the events leading up to the dispute, were called "really bizarre" (emphasis in original) by the Ninth Circuit. [1] Stephen M. Cohen was ordered to pay $65 million to Gary Kremen, but claimed that he did not have that much money despite the success of his fraudulent sex.com website. Cohen declared personal bankruptcy and absconded to Mexico, where he eluded capture for several years until being deported by Mexican authorities for immigration violations in 2005. [2] In the meantime, Kremen had offered a reward for Cohen's capture, which he advertised on his own version of the sex.com website. [7] Despite several additional court orders, Cohen has never paid the ordered damages to Kremen and continues to claim poverty. [8]

The case illustrated the value of strategically-constructed domain names on the World Wide Web, which in turn inspired questionable actions by parties who wished to control other such website names. [9] The case also revealed the need to address whether traditional contract law was equipped to handle the buying and selling, and even the theft, of domain names as the World Wide Web developed. [10]

Despite never receiving his $65 million judgment from Cohen, Kremen later made use of the sex.com domain after he regained ownership, and in 2006 he sold the domain name for $14 million, which at the time was the largest amount ever paid in such a transaction. [11] [12] The saga was also the topic of the book Sex.com: One Domain, Two Men, Twelve Years and the Brutal Battle for the Jewel in the Internet's Crown by journalist Kieren McCarthy. [3]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">False Claims Act</span> United States federal law

The False Claims Act (FCA) is an American federal law that imposes liability on persons and companies who defraud governmental programs. It is the federal government's primary litigation tool in combating fraud against the government. The law includes a qui tam provision that allows people who are not affiliated with the government, called "relators" under the law, to file actions on behalf of the government. This is informally called "whistleblowing", especially when the relator is employed by the organization accused in the suit. Persons filing actions under the Act stand to receive a portion of any recovered damages.

Gary Kremen is an American engineer, entrepreneur and politician who founded the personals site Match.com, was the first registrant of Sex.com and founder of Clean Power Finance, and was a board member of the Santa Clara Valley Water District from 2014 through 2022. Since 1993, Kremen has been a private and angel investor in over 100 companies, of which several have gone public or had liquidity events.

Mail fraud and wire fraud are terms used in the United States to describe the use of a physical or electronic mail system to defraud another, and are U.S. federal crimes. Jurisdiction is claimed by the federal government if the illegal activity crosses interstate or international borders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen M. Cohen</span>

Stephen Michael Cohen is an American who gained notoriety after acquiring control of the domain name Sex.com in 1995. He also has citizenship in Mexico, Israel and in the principality of Monaco. He was later implicated in involvement in running the controversial peer-to-peer service EarthStation 5.

Neil Papiano was an American lawyer, and managing partner of Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch. He received Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts degrees from Stanford University, the latter in 1957, and an LL.B. from Vanderbilt University Law School in 1961. He was admitted to the State Bar of California in 1961.

Robert David Sack is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Dennis Jacobs is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Sex.com is an Internet domain name and web portal currently owned by Clover Holdings LTD. The domain name was the focus of one of the most publicized legal actions about ownership of domain names. Kieren McCarthy, a journalist who followed the case, wrote the book Sex.com, which was published in 2007.

<i>People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney</i> 2001 lawsuit over cybersquatting

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney, 263 F.3d 359, was an Internet domain trademark infringement decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The ruling became an early precedent on the nature of domain names as both trademarked intellectual property and free speech.

Conversion is an intentional tort consisting of "taking with the intent of exercising over the chattel an ownership inconsistent with the real owner's right of possession". In England and Wales, it is a tort of strict liability. Its equivalents in criminal law include larceny or theft and criminal conversion. In those jurisdictions that recognise it, criminal conversion is a lesser crime than theft/larceny.

<i>Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson</i>

Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson[1991] EWCA Civ 12 is an English contract law case on misrepresentation. It examines the Misrepresentation Act 1967 and addresses the extent of damages available under s 2(1) for negligent misrepresentation.

Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders, 553 U.S. 662 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must prove that the false claim was made with the specific intent of inducing the government to pay or approve payment of a false or fraudulent claim, rather than merely defrauding a contractor. Congress overruled this decision with the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009.

The collection of judgments in Virginia may be accomplished under a number of routes provided under Virginia law, depending on the amount of the judgment and the particular assets that the judgment creditor wishes to pursue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Honest services fraud</span> Crime in the United States

Honest services fraud is a crime defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1346, added by the United States Congress in 1988, which states "For the purposes of this chapter, the term scheme or artifice to defraud includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services."

McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal statute criminalizing mail fraud applied only to the schemes and artifices defrauding victims of money or property, as opposed to those defrauding citizens of their rights to good government. The case was superseded one year later when the United States Congress amended the law to specifically include honest services fraud in the mail and wire fraud statutes.

<i>Lamparello v. Falwell</i>

Lamparello v. Falwell, 420 F.3d 309, was a legal case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concerning allegations of cybersquatting and trademark infringement. The dispute centered on the right to use the domain name fallwell.com, and provides discussion on cybersquatting as it applies to criticism of a trademark.

<i>Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc.</i>

Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040, is a 2009 court opinion in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed the standing requirements necessary for private plaintiffs to bring suit under the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, or CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, 15 U.S.C. ch. 103, as well as the scope of the CAN-SPAM Act's federal preemption. Prior to this case, the CAN-SPAM Act's standing requirements had not been addressed at the Court of Appeals level, and only the Fourth Circuit had addressed the CAN-SPAM Act's preemptive scope.

<i>Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox</i> 2011 US legal case concerning online defamation

Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox is a 2011 case from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon concerning online defamation. Plaintiffs Obsidian Finance Group and its co-founder Kevin Padrick sued Crystal Cox for maintaining several blogs that accused Obsidian and Padrick of corrupt and fraudulent conduct. The court dismissed most of Cox's blog posts as opinion, but found one single post to be more factual in its assertions and therefore defamatory. For that post, the court awarded the plaintiffs $2.5 million in damages. This case is notable for the court's ruling that Cox, as an internet blogger, was not a journalist and was thus not protected by Oregon's media shield laws, although the court later clarified that its ruling did not categorically exclude blogs from being considered media and indicated that its decision was based in part upon Cox offering to remove negative posts for a $2,500 fee. In January 2014 the Ninth Circuit Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court's judgment awarding compensatory damages to the bankruptcy trustee. It also ordered a new trial on the blog post at issue.

Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965), was a 1965 decision of the United States Supreme Court that held, for the first time, that enforcement of a fraudulently procured patent violated the antitrust laws and provided a basis for a claim of treble damages if it caused a substantial anticompetitive effect.

United States v. Throckmorton is an 1878 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on civil procedure, specifically res judicata, in cases heard at equity. A unanimous Court affirmed an appeal of a decision by the District Court for California upholding a Mexican-era land claim, holding that collateral estoppel bars untimely motions to set aside the verdict where the purportedly fraudulent evidence has already been considered and a decision reached. In the opinion it distinguished between that kind of fraud, which it called intrinsic, and extrinsic fraud, in which deceptive actions exterior to the proceeding prevented a party, or potential party, to the action from becoming aware of the possibility they could vindicate their rights in court.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kremen v. Cohen, 337 F. 3d 1024 (9th Cir., 2003).
  2. 1 2 3 McCarthy, Kieran (October 28, 2005). "Sex.com thief arrested". The Register . Archived from the original on March 10, 2011. Retrieved April 17, 2011.
  3. 1 2 3 McCarthy, Kieren (2007). Sex.com: One Domain, Two Men, Twelve Years and the Brutal Battle for the Jewel in the Internet's Crown. Quercus. ISBN   978-1-905204-66-3
  4. 1 2 3 Kremen v. Cohen, 99 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (N.D. Cal., 2000).
  5. ↑ Prendergast, Jay (2004). "Kremen v. Cohen: The "Knotty" Saga of sex.com". Jurimetrics. 45 (1): 75–91 – via JSTOR.
  6. ↑ Kremen v. Cohen, 325 F. 3d 1035 (9th Cir., 2003).
  7. ↑ "$50,000 Reward For Arrest Of Man Who Stole Sex.Com". Offshore-e-com. June 5, 2001. Archived from the original on October 5, 2011. Retrieved April 17, 2011.
  8. ↑ Pardon, Rhett (December 23, 2011). "Former Sex.com Owner Still Chasing $65M Unpaid Judgment". XBIZ.com. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013. Retrieved August 3, 2012.
  9. ↑ Schottenstein, Noah M. (2009). "Of Process and Product: Kremen v. Cohen and the Consequences of Recognizing Property Rights in Domain Names". Virginia Journal of Law & Technology. 14 (1): 1–25 – via HeinOnline.
  10. ↑ Franks, Courtney W. (2005). "Analyzing the Urge to Merge: Conversion of Intangible Property and the Merger Doctrine in the Wake of Kremen v. Cohen". Houston Law Review. 42 (2): 489–528 – via HeinOnline.
  11. ↑ "Sex.com Sold for $14 Million". Web Host Industry Review. January 20, 2006. Archived from the original on April 5, 2011. Retrieved April 17, 2011.
  12. ↑ Tom Merritt (May 29, 2009). "Top 5 most expensive domain names". cNET.com. Archived from the original on March 17, 2011. Retrieved April 17, 2011.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.