Lex curiata de imperio

Last updated

In the constitution of ancient Rome, the lex curiata de imperio (plural leges curiatae) was the law confirming the rights of higher magistrates to hold power, or imperium . In theory, it was passed by the comitia curiata , which was also the source for leges curiatae pertaining to Roman adoption. [1]

Contents

In the late Republic, historians and political theorists thought that the necessity of such a law dated to the Regal period, when kings after Romulus had to submit to ratification by the Roman people. Like many other aspects of Roman religion and law, the lex curiata was attributed [2] to Numa Pompilius, Rome's second king. This origin seems to have been reconstructed after the fact to explain why the law was required, at a time when the original intent of the ceremony conferring imperium was no longer understood. [3] The last two kings, however, were said to have ruled without such ratification, [4] which at any rate may have been more loosely acclamation. [5]

The law was passed in an assembly that during the late Republic existed in name only, the comitia curiata , based on the curiae . The curiae were supposed to have been the thirty political divisions created by Romulus and named after the Sabine women, who were from Cures in Sabine territory. These political units were replaced as early as 218 BC by lictors; the people no longer assembled, as each curia was represented by a lictor, and confirmation was virtually automatic, unless a tribune chose to obstruct. Even then, an unconfirmed magistrate might forge ahead with the functions of his office regardless. [6] By the late Republic, a magistrate could simply dispense with this ratification in claiming his imperium, or a legislator could include a provision in a bill that rendered a curiate law redundant. The censors, by contrast, were confirmed by the comitia centuriata . It therefore becomes unclear what purpose the lex curiata continued to serve: [7] "The origin, nature, and importance of the lex curiata de imperio have been extensively and inconclusively debated." [8]

It has sometimes been supposed that the lex curiata is what conferred the right to take auspices, though scholars are not unanimous on this point. [9] H.S. Versnel, in his study of the Roman triumph, argued that the lex curiata de imperio was a prerequisite for a commander before he could be awarded a triumph. [10] Imperium, Versnel maintained, was not granted to a commander within a political framework, but was rather a quality within the man that manifests itself and is acknowledged ceremonially by a lex curiata de imperio. [11] The lex was not fundamental to the holding of imperium or auspicium , [12] but was rather the act through which the people expressed their recognition of that authority. [13]

Even if the lex curiata became largely ceremonial, it retained enough force to be useful for political tactics when evoked. Tribunes could obstruct its passage; the consuls of 54 BC lacked the lex, and their legitimacy to govern as proconsuls was questioned; during the civil war, the consuls of 49 used their own lack of a lex as an excuse for not holding elections for their successors. [14]

Selected bibliography

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizens' assemblies of the Roman Republic</span> Political institutions in Roman Republic

The legislative assemblies of the Roman Republic were political institutions in the ancient Roman Republic. According to the contemporary historian Polybius, it was the people who had the final say regarding the election of magistrates, the enactment of Roman laws, the carrying out of capital punishment, the declaration of war and peace, and the creation of alliances. Under the Constitution of the Roman Republic, the people held the ultimate source of sovereignty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lictor</span> Bodyguard and attendant to ancient Roman magistrates

A lictor was a Roman civil servant who was an attendant and bodyguard to a magistrate who held imperium. Lictors are documented since the Roman Kingdom, and may have originated with the Etruscans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman dictator</span> Extraordinary magistrate of the Roman Republic

A Roman dictator was an extraordinary magistrate in the Roman Republic endowed with full authority to resolve some specific problem to which he had been assigned. He received the full powers of the state, subordinating the other magistrates, consuls included, for the specific purpose of resolving that issue, and that issue only, and then dispensing with those powers forthwith.

<i>Magister equitum</i> Roman magistrate

The magister equitum, in English Master of the Horse or Master of the Cavalry, was a Roman magistrate appointed as lieutenant to a dictator. His nominal function was to serve as commander of the Roman cavalry in time of war, but just as a dictator could be nominated to respond to other crises, so the magister equitum could operate independently of the cavalry; like the dictator, the appointment of a magister equitum served both military and political purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plebeian Council</span> Principal assembly of the ancient Roman Republic

The Concilium Plebis was the principal assembly of the common people of the ancient Roman Republic. It functioned as a legislative/judicial assembly, through which the plebeians (commoners) could pass legislation, elect plebeian tribunes and plebeian aediles, and try judicial cases. The Plebeian Council was originally organized on the basis of the Curia but in 471 BC adopted an organizational system based on residential districts or tribes. The Plebeian Council usually met in the well of the Comitium and could only be convoked by the tribune of the plebs. The patricians were excluded from the Council.

The lex Titia was a Roman law passed on 27 November 43 BC that established the Triumvirate of Octavian, Mark Antony and Marcus Aemilius Lepidus for five years until the end of 38 BC. The triumvirate established by the law was then renewed in 38 BC. Unlike the so-called First Triumvirate, which was a private arrangement among three men, the Second Triumvirate was a legal instrument which created a formal legal framework to empower the three triumvirs with practically absolute power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curiate Assembly</span> Peoples assembly in ancient rome

The Curiate Assembly was the principal assembly that evolved in shape and form over the course of the Roman Kingdom until the Comitia Centuriata organized by Servius Tullius. During these first decades, the people of Rome were organized into thirty units called "Curiae". The Curiae were ethnic in nature, and thus were organized on the basis of the early Roman family, or, more specifically, on the basis of the thirty original patrician (aristocratic) clans. The Curiae formed an assembly for legislative, electoral, and judicial purposes. The Curiate Assembly passed laws, elected Consuls, and tried judicial cases. Consuls always presided over the assembly. While plebeians (commoners) could participate in this assembly, only the patricians could vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman consul</span> Political office in ancient Rome

A consul held the highest elected political office of the Roman Republic, and ancient Romans considered the consulship the second-highest level of the cursus honorum after that of the censor. Each year, the Centuriate Assembly elected two consuls to serve jointly for a one-year term. The consuls alternated in holding fasces – taking turns leading – each month when both were in Rome. A consul's imperium extended over Rome and all its provinces.

Appius Claudius Crassus InregillensisSabinus was a Roman senator during the early Republic, most notable as the leading member of the ten-man board which drew up the Twelve Tables of Roman law around 451 BC. He is also probably identical with the Appius Claudius who was consul in 471 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman tribe</span> Grouping of Roman citizens

A tribus, or tribe, was a division of the Roman people for military, censorial, and voting purposes. When constituted in the comitia tributa, the tribes were the voting units of a legislative assembly of the Roman Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the Roman Republic</span> Norms, customs, and written laws, which guided the government of the Roman Republic

The constitution of the Roman Republic was a set of uncodified norms and customs which, together with various written laws, guided the procedural governance of the Roman Republic. The constitution emerged from that of the Roman kingdom, evolved substantively and significantly—almost to the point of unrecognisability—over the almost five hundred years of the republic. The collapse of republican government and norms from 133 BC would lead to the rise of Augustus and his principate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Constitution</span>

The Roman Constitution was an uncodified set of guidelines and principles passed down mainly through precedent. The Roman constitution was not formal or even official, largely unwritten and constantly evolving. Having those characteristics, it was therefore more like the British and United States common law system than a sovereign law system like the English Constitutions of Clarendon and Great Charter or the United States Constitution, even though the constitution's evolution through the years was often directed by passage of new laws and repeal of older ones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribal Assembly</span> Assembly of the Roman Republic

The Tribal Assembly was an assembly consisting of all Roman citizens convened by tribes (tribus).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Centuriate Assembly</span> Roman assembly that elected all magistrates holding imperium

The Centuriate Assembly of the Roman Republic was one of the three voting assemblies in the Roman constitution. It was named the Centuriate Assembly as it originally divided Roman citizens into groups of one hundred men by classes. The centuries initially reflected military status, but were later based on the wealth of their members. The centuries gathered into the Centuriate Assembly for legislative, electoral, and judicial purposes. The majority of votes in any century decided how that century voted. Each century received one vote, regardless of how many electors each Century held. Once a majority of centuries voted in the same way on a given measure, the voting ended, and the matter was decided. Only the Centuriate Assembly could declare war or elect the highest-ranking Roman magistrates: consuls, praetors and censors. The Centuriate Assembly could also pass a law that granted constitutional command authority, or "Imperium", to Consuls and Praetors, and Censorial powers to Censors. In addition, the Centuriate Assembly served as the highest court of appeal in certain judicial cases, and ratified the results of a Census.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prorogatio</span>

Prorogatio was a Roman practice in which a Roman magistrate's duties were extended beyond its normal annual term. It developed as a response to Roman expansion's demands for more generals and governors to administer conquered territories.

Marcus Baebius Tamphilus was a consul of the Roman Republic in 181 BC along with P. Cornelius Cethegus. Baebius is credited with reform legislation pertaining to campaigns for political offices and electoral bribery (ambitus). The Lex Baebia was the first bribery law in Rome and had long-term impact on Roman administrative practices in the provinces.

<i>Lex Publilia</i> (471 BC) Ancient Roman law

The lex Publilia, also known as the Publilian Rogation, was a law traditionally passed in 471 BC, transferring the election of the tribunes of the plebs to the comitia tributa, thereby freeing their election from the direct influence of the Senate and patrician magistrates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Volero Publilius</span> 5th-century BC Roman tribune of the plebs

Volero Publilius was tribune of the plebs in Rome in 472 and 471 BC. During his time as tribune, he secured the passage of two important laws increasing the independence of his office.

<i>Lex Pompeia de ambitu</i> Roman electoral law of 52 BCE

The lex Pompeia de ambitu was a law of the Roman Republic, passed in 52 BCE, aimed at prosecuting bribery and corruption in elections. It was proposed and enacted by Pompey the Great, who used it to prosecute and exile his political enemies.

References

  1. Andrew Lintott, The Constitution of the Roman Republic (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), p. 28.
  2. Cicero, De re publica 2.13 et passim.
  3. H.S. Versnel, Triumphus: An Inquiry into the Origin, Development and Meaning of the Roman Triumph (Brill, 1970), p. 320; see pp. 320–322 for discussion of various views of the nature of this imperium and its relation to the lex curiata.
  4. Lintott, Constitution, pp. 28–29, 222.
  5. Lily Ross Taylor, Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar (University of Michigan Press, 1966, 1990), p. 3.
  6. L.R. Taylor, Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 4; Lintott, Constitution, pp. 28–29, 49.
  7. Lintott, Constitution, pp. 28–29, 49.
  8. S.P. Oakley, A Commentary on Livy, Books VI-X (Oxford University Press, 2005), vol. 3, p. 494 online. See also for ancient sources.
  9. Lintott, Constitution, p. 103.
  10. Versnel, Triumphus, p. 168, note 2, citing Cicero, Ad Atticum 4.16.12.
  11. Versnel, Triumphus, pp. 319-349, and 356 online.
  12. Oakley, Commentary on Livy, p. 494.
  13. T. Corey Brennan, The Praetorship in the Roman Republic (Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 13.
  14. Oakley, Commentary on Livy, pp. 493–494. For more on the consuls of 49 BC in regard to the lex curiata, see Jerzy Linderski, "Q. Scipio Imperator," in Imperium sine fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic (Franz Steiner, 1996), pp. 166–167. On the consuls of 54, see G.V. Sumner, "The coitio of 54 BC, or Waiting for Caesar," Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 86 (1982) 133–139.