List of camouflage methods

Last updated

Camouflage is the concealment of animals or objects of military interest by any combination of methods that helps them to remain unnoticed. This includes the use of high-contrast disruptive patterns as used on military uniforms, but anything that delays recognition can be used as camouflage. Camouflage involves deception, whether by looking like the background or by resembling something else, which may be plainly visible to observers. [1] [2] This article lists methods used by animals and the military to escape notice.

Contents

Conventions used

Striated frogfish, Antennarius striatus, is elaborately camouflaged for life on the subtropical ocean floor. Antennarius striatus2.JPG
Striated frogfish, Antennarius striatus, is elaborately camouflaged for life on the subtropical ocean floor.

Different camouflage methods employed by terrestrial, aerial, and aquatic animals, and in military usage, are compared in the table. Several methods are often combined, so for example the Bushbuck is both countershaded over its whole body, and disruptively coloured with small pale spots. Until the discovery of countershading in the 1890s, protective coloration was considered to be mainly a matter of colour matching, [3] but while this is certainly important, a variety of other methods are used to provide effective camouflage. [1] [2]

When an entry is marked Dominant, that method is used widely in that environment, in most cases. For example, countershading is very common among land animals, but not for military camouflage. The dominant camouflage methods on land are countershading and disruptive coloration, supported by less frequent usage of many other methods. [4] The dominant camouflage methods in the open ocean are transparency, [5] reflection, and counterillumination. [6] Transparency and reflectivity are dominant in the top 100 metres (330 ft) of the ocean; counterillumination is dominant from 100 metres (330 ft) down to 1,000 metres (3,300 ft). [6] Most animals of the open sea use one or more of these methods. [6] Military camouflage relies predominantly on disruptive patterns, [7] though methods such as outline disruption are also used, and others have been prototyped.

In 1890 the English zoologist Edward Bagnall Poulton categorised animal colours by their uses, [8] which cover both camouflage and mimicry. [9] Poulton's categories were largely followed by Hugh Cott in 1940. [4] Relevant Poulton categories are listed in the table. Where Poulton's definition covers a method but does not name it explicitly, the category is named in parentheses.

Comparisons

Examples of camouflage methods in animal and military usage
Method Poulton
category [4] [8]
Terrestrial, aerial Aquatic Military
Mimesis:
resembling something not of interest to the observer
Special aggressive resemblance:
mimesis by a predator to avoid scaring off prey
Flower mantis [10]
Mantis Hymenopus coronatus 6 Luc Viatour.jpg
Green frogfish [11]
Green Frogfish.jpg
Sunshield [12]
IWM-E-18461-Crusader-camouflaged-19421026.jpg
Special protective resemblance:
resemblance to a specific object by prey to avoid detection by predators
Dead leaf butterfly [8]
Kallima inachus qtl1.jpg
Soft coral spider crab [13]
Hoplophrys oatesii (Soft coral spider crab).jpg
Observation tree, 1916 [14]
Andre Mare Camouflaged Iron Observation Tree (The Elm at Vermezeele) 1916.jpg
Colour matching:
having similar colours to the environment, also known as background matching
General protective resemblance:
resembling the background in a general way
European tree frog [3]
Laubfrosch.jpg
Brown trout [15]
Salmo trutta.jpg
Khaki uniforms, 1910 [16]
Greek artillery, 1910.png
Disruptive coloration:
having high contrast coloration that breaks up outlines, so observers fail to recognise the object
General protective resemblance (a type of) Papuan frogmouth [17]
Podargus papuensis - Daintree River.jpg
Dominant
Commerson's frogfish [18]
Commerson's Frogfish, Kona, Hawaii.jpg
Disruptive Pattern Material [19]
British dpm2.jpg
Dominant
Disruptive eye mask:
a disruptive pattern that covers or runs up to the eyes, concealing them
Coincident disruptive pattern (a type of) (Cott) Common frog [20]
2014.07.17.-28-Zadlitzgraben Pressel--Grasfrosch-Weibchen.jpg
Jack-knifefish [21]
Equetus lanceolatus in Madagascar Reef.jpg
Gun barrel of
Sherman Firefly [22]
Sherman Firefly 9-08-2008 15-05-43.JPG
Seasonal variation:
having coloration that varies with season, usually summer to winter
Variable general protective resemblance:
having coloration that resembles the background in each season, in a general way
Arctic hare [23]
Arctic Hare 1.jpg
Walleye [24] Sander vitreus.jpg Snow overalls [25]
Norwegian Winter War Volunteers.jpg
Side or Thayer countershading:
having graded toning from dark above to light below, so as to cancel out the apparent effect of self-shadowing when viewed from the side
Bushbuck (also has white distractive markings) [26]
Tragelaphus scriptus (male) cropped.jpg
Dominant
Blue shark [27]
Blue shark.jpg
Hugh Cott's guns [28]
Countershaded Rail-mounted Gun Camouflaged by Hugh Cott 1940.jpg
Above/below countershading:
having different colours or patterns above and below, to camouflage the upperside for observers from above, and the underside for observers from below
Gull (white underside to match sky, improves fishing success) [29]
Gull in flight.jpg
Penguins [30]
Penguins walking -Moltke Harbour, South Georgia, British overseas territory, UK-8.jpg
Supermarine Spitfire [31]
Spitfire mk2a p7350 arp.jpg
Counterillumination:
generating light to raise the brightness of an object to match a brighter background, as of a marine animal's underside against the sea surface
Sparkling enope squid [32] [33]
Squid Counterillumination.png
Dominant (100–1000m)
 
Yehudi lights
(prototype) [34]
Principle of Yehudi Lights with Avenger head-on view.jpg
Transparency:
letting so much light through that the object is hard to see in typical lighting conditions
General protective resemblance (a type of) Glass frogs [35]
Hyalinobatrachium uranoscopum01a.jpg
Comb jellies [32]
Mnemiopsis leidyi.jpg
Dominant (0–100m)
1916 trials [36]
Emile Taddeoli monoplane.jpg
Reflection (silvering):
reflecting enough light, usually from the sides, to make the object show as a (reflected) patch of the environment
General protective resemblance (a type of) Pilchard [32]
Sardina pilchardus 2011.jpg
Dominant (0–100m)
Self-decoration:
covering oneself in materials from the environment
Adventitious protection:
covering oneself in materials that are not part of the body
Masked hunter bug [37]
Reduvius personatus, Masked Hunter Bug nymph camouflaged with sand grains.JPG
Decorator crabs [38]
Graceful decorator crab (Oregonia gracilis) with sponge.jpg
Ghillie suit [39]
Marine sniper ghillie suit.JPG
Concealment of shadow:
having features such as flanges or a flattened body to reduce or hide the shadow
Flying lizard [40]
2005-Draco-dussumieri.jpg
Tasselled wobbegong [41]
Eucrossorhinus dasypogon.jpg
Camouflage netting [42]
Ovelse pa Evjemoen Tropp 4.2 - camouflage nettings.jpg
Irregular outline:
having a broken or complex outline (that may help delay recognition by an observer)
Special protective resemblance (types of) Comma butterfly [43]
Polygonia c-album LC0238.jpg
Leafy sea dragon [44]
Leafy Sea Dragon.jpg
Scrim, branches [45]
Battle of Lake Khasan-Camouflaged soviet tanks.jpg
Distraction:
having coloration that distracts an observer's attention away from a feature of the object (such as the head or eye)
Eyespots of
peacock butterfly [46]
Inachis io qtl2.jpg
Foureye butterflyfish [47]
Chaetodon capistratus1.jpg
False bow wave in
ship camouflage [48]
USS Northampton (CA-26) at Brisbane on 5 August 1941 (NH 94596).jpg
Distractive markings
Small conspicuous marks that distract an observer's attention from recognising the object as a whole [49]
Snowy owl with distractively marked plumage [50]
Bubo scandiacus male Muskegon (cropped).jpg
Snow camouflage using small distractive marks
Active camouflage:
changing the coloration rapidly enough to maintain resemblance to the current background while moving
Variable aggressive resemblance, variable protective resemblance:
varying coloration to resemble the background, in predator and prey respectively
Veiled chameleon [51]
Yemen Chameleon (cropped).jpg
Octopuses [52]
Octopus2.jpg
Adaptiv [53]
(see that article for image)
Motion camouflage:
following a track such that the object remains between a starting point and the target (e.g. prey) at all times, rather than going straight for the target
Hoverfly [54]
Syritta pipiens-pjt1.jpg
Air-to-air missile [55]
F-15 firing AIM-7Ms.jpg
Used primarily for efficiency
Motion dazzle:
rapidly moving a bold pattern of contrasting stripes, confusing an observer's visual processing [56] [57]
Zebra [57]
Chapman-Zebra.jpg
Proposal only [56]

(NB: Marine
Dazzle camouflage
did not claim
this effect)
Dazzle camouflage:
bold patterns of contrasting stripes, deceiving enemy about ship's heading
Ship camouflage, mainly WW1 [58]
USS West Mahomet (ID-3681) cropped.jpg
Dominant 1917–18
Ultra-blackness:
extremely black surface, matching very dark background
Black panther [59]
Black panther (4530714641).jpg
Deep-sea fish [60]
Humpback anglerfish.png
Night fighters [61]
Hurricane XII RCAF 5589.jpg

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Camouflage</span> Concealment in plain sight by any means, e.g. colour, pattern and shape

Camouflage is the use of any combination of materials, coloration, or illumination for concealment, either by making animals or objects hard to see, or by disguising them as something else. Examples include the leopard's spotted coat, the battledress of a modern soldier, and the leaf-mimic katydid's wings. A third approach, motion dazzle, confuses the observer with a conspicuous pattern, making the object visible but momentarily harder to locate, as well as making general aiming easier. The majority of camouflage methods aim for crypsis, often through a general resemblance to the background, high contrast disruptive coloration, eliminating shadow, and countershading. In the open ocean, where there is no background, the principal methods of camouflage are transparency, silvering, and countershading, while the ability to produce light is among other things used for counter-illumination on the undersides of cephalopods such as squid. Some animals, such as chameleons and octopuses, are capable of actively changing their skin pattern and colours, whether for camouflage or for signalling. It is possible that some plants use camouflage to evade being eaten by herbivores.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abbott Handerson Thayer</span> American painter (1849–1921)

Abbott Handerson Thayer was an American artist, naturalist, and teacher. As a painter of portraits, figures, animals, and landscapes, he enjoyed a certain prominence during his lifetime, and his paintings are represented in major American art collections. He is perhaps best known for his 'angel' paintings, some of which use his children as models.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crypsis</span> Aspect of animal behaviour and morphology

In ecology, crypsis is the ability of an animal or a plant to avoid observation or detection by other animals. It may be a predation strategy or an antipredator adaptation. Methods include camouflage, nocturnality, subterranean lifestyle and mimicry. Crypsis can involve visual, olfactory or auditory concealment. When it is visual, the term cryptic coloration, effectively a synonym for animal camouflage, is sometimes used, but many different methods of camouflage are employed by animals or plants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military camouflage</span> Camouflage used to protect from enemy observation

Military camouflage is the use of camouflage by an armed force to protect personnel and equipment from observation by enemy forces. In practice, this means applying colour and materials to military equipment of all kinds, including vehicles, ships, aircraft, gun positions and battledress, either to conceal it from observation (crypsis), or to make it appear as something else (mimicry). The French slang word camouflage came into common English usage during World War I when the concept of visual deception developed into an essential part of modern military tactics. In that war, long-range artillery and observation from the air combined to expand the field of fire, and camouflage was widely used to decrease the danger of being targeted or to enable surprise. As such, military camouflage is a form of military deception in addition to cultural functions such as political identification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugh B. Cott</span> English zoologist and camouflage expert (1900–1987)

Hugh Bamford Cott was a British zoologist, an authority on both natural and military camouflage, and a scientific illustrator and photographer. Many of his field studies took place in Africa, where he was especially interested in the Nile crocodile, the evolution of pattern and colour in animals. During the Second World War, Cott worked as a camouflage expert for the British Army and helped to influence War Office policy on camouflage. His book Adaptive Coloration in Animals (1940), popular among serving soldiers, was the major textbook on camouflage in zoology of the twentieth century. After the war, he became a Fellow of Selwyn College, Cambridge. As a Fellow of the Zoological Society of London, he undertook expeditions to Africa and the Amazon to collect specimens, mainly reptiles and amphibians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Countershading</span> Camouflage to counteract self-shading

Countershading, or Thayer's law, is a method of camouflage in which an animal's coloration is darker on the top or upper side and lighter on the underside of the body. This pattern is found in many species of mammals, reptiles, birds, fish, and insects, both in predators and in prey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decorator crab</span> Self-camouflaging animals

Decorator crabs are crabs of several different species, belonging to the superfamily Majoidea, that use materials from their environment to hide from, or ward off, predators. They decorate themselves by sticking mostly sedentary animals and plants to their bodies as camouflage, or if the attached organisms are noxious, to ward off predators through aposematism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal coloration</span> General appearance of an animal

Animal colouration is the general appearance of an animal resulting from the reflection or emission of light from its surfaces. Some animals are brightly coloured, while others are hard to see. In some species, such as the peafowl, the male has strong patterns, conspicuous colours and is iridescent, while the female is far less visible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Underwater camouflage</span> Camouflage in water, mainly by transparency, reflection, counter-illumination

Underwater camouflage is the set of methods of achieving crypsis—avoidance of observation—that allows otherwise visible aquatic organisms to remain unnoticed by other organisms such as predators or prey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disruptive coloration</span> Camouflage to break up an objects outlines

Disruptive coloration is a form of camouflage that works by breaking up the outlines of an animal, soldier or military vehicle with a strongly contrasting pattern. It is often combined with other methods of crypsis including background colour matching and countershading; special cases are coincident disruptive coloration and the disruptive eye mask seen in some fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. It appears paradoxical as a way of not being seen, since disruption of outlines depends on high contrast, so the patches of colour are themselves conspicuous.

<i>Adaptive Coloration in Animals</i> 1940 textbook on camouflage, mimicry and aposematism by Hugh Cott

Adaptive Coloration in Animals is a 500-page textbook about camouflage, warning coloration and mimicry by the Cambridge zoologist Hugh Cott, first published during the Second World War in 1940; the book sold widely and made him famous.

<i>Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom</i> Book by Abbott Handerson Thayer

Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom: An Exposition of the Laws of Disguise Through Color and Pattern; Being a Summary of Abbott H. Thayer’s Discoveries is a book published ostensibly by Gerald H. Thayer in 1909, and revised in 1918, but in fact a collaboration with and completion of his father Abbott Handerson Thayer's major work.

<i>Animal Coloration</i> (book) 1892 book by Frank Evers Beddard

Animal Coloration, or in full Animal Coloration: An Account of the Principal Facts and Theories Relating to the Colours and Markings of Animals, is a book by the English zoologist Frank Evers Beddard, published by Swan Sonnenschein in 1892. It formed part of the ongoing debate amongst zoologists about the relevance of Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to the observed appearance, structure, and behaviour of animals, and vice versa.

Deception in animals is the transmission of misinformation by one animal to another, of the same or different species, in a way that propagates beliefs that are not true.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coloration evidence for natural selection</span> Early evidence for Darwinism from animal coloration

Animal coloration provided important early evidence for evolution by natural selection, at a time when little direct evidence was available. Three major functions of coloration were discovered in the second half of the 19th century, and subsequently used as evidence of selection: camouflage ; mimicry, both Batesian and Müllerian; and aposematism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coincident disruptive coloration</span> Camouflage joining up separate parts of body

Coincident disruptive coloration or coincident disruptive patterns are patterns of disruptive coloration in animals that go beyond the usual camouflage function of breaking up the continuity of an animal's shape, to join up parts of the body that are separate. This is seen in extreme form in frogs such as Afrixalus fornasini where the camouflage pattern extends across the body, head, and all four limbs, making the animal look quite unlike a frog when at rest with the limbs tucked in.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Distractive markings</span>

Distractive markings serve to camouflage animals or military vehicles by drawing the observer's attention away from the object as a whole, such as noticing its outline. This delays recognition. The markings necessarily have high contrast and are thus in themselves conspicuous. The mechanism therefore relies, as does camouflage as a whole, on deceiving the cognition of the observer, not in blending with the background.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Self-decoration camouflage</span> Camouflage by attaching local materials to ones body

Self-decoration camouflage is a method of camouflage in which animals or soldiers select materials, sometimes living, from the environment and attach these to themselves for concealment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disruptive eye mask</span> Camouflage to conceal the eye

Disruptive eye masks are camouflage markings that conceal the eyes of an animal from its predators or prey. They are used by prey, to avoid being seen by predators, and by predators to help them approach their prey.

<i>Dazzled and Deceived</i> Camouflage book by Peter Forbes

Dazzled and Deceived: Mimicry and Camouflage is a 2009 book on camouflage and mimicry, in nature and military usage, by the science writer and journalist Peter Forbes. It covers the history of these topics from the 19th century onwards, describing the discoveries of Henry Walter Bates, Alfred Russel Wallace and Fritz Müller, especially their studies of butterflies in the Amazon. The narrative also covers 20th-century military camouflage, begun by the painter Abbot Thayer who advocated disruptive coloration and countershading and continued in the First World War by the zoologist John Graham Kerr and the marine artist Norman Wilkinson, who developed dazzle camouflage. In the Second World War, the leading expert was Hugh Cott, who advised the British army on camouflage in the Western Desert.

References

  1. 1 2 Cott, 1940. Chapter 1: General Colour Resemblance. pp. 5–19.
  2. 1 2 Forbes, 2009. p. 51.
  3. 1 2 Beddard, 1892. p. 83.
  4. 1 2 3 Cott, 1940. Part 1: Concealment. pp. 5–190.
  5. Johnsen, Sönke (December 2001). "Hidden in Plain Sight: The Ecology and Physiology of Organismal Transparency". Biological Bulletin. 201 (3): 301–318. doi:10.2307/1543609. JSTOR   1543609. PMID   11751243. S2CID   6385064.
  6. 1 2 3 McFall-Ngai, Margaret J (1990). "Crypsis in the Pelagic Environment". American Zoologist. 30 (1): 175–188. doi: 10.1093/icb/30.1.175 .
  7. Newark, 2007. p. 154.
  8. 1 2 3 Poulton, 1890. Fold-out after p. 339.
  9. Forbes, 2009. pp. 51–52.
  10. Forbes, 2009. p. 134.
  11. Cott, 1940. pp. 340–342.
  12. Barkas, 1952. pp. 202–203.
  13. Cott, 1940. p. 338.
  14. "Art of the First World War: André Mare and Leon Underwood". The Elm at Vermezeele. Memorial-Caen. 1998. Archived from the original on 29 May 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2013.
  15. Cott, 1940. p. 28.
  16. Newark, 2007. pp. 45–46.
  17. Cott, 1940. p. 148.
  18. Bester, Cathleen. "Striated Frogfish". Florida Museum of Natural History. Archived from the original on 16 December 2012. Retrieved 12 February 2013.
  19. Blechman, Hardy; Newman, Alex (2004). DPM: Disruptive Pattern Material. DPM Ltd.
  20. Cott, 1940. pp. 70–88.
  21. Barlow, G. W. (1972). "The attitude of fish eye-lines in relation to body shape and to stripes and bars". Copeia. 1972 (1): 4–12. doi:10.2307/1442777. JSTOR   1442777.
  22. Middle East AFV Technical Letter. The Tank Museum, UK; originally G(Cam) Eighth Army. 26 January 1945.
  23. Cott, 1940. p. 23.
  24. Schaefer, Wayne F.; Schmitz, Mark H.; Blazer, Vicki S.; Ehlinger, Timothy J.; Berges, John A. (2014). "Localization and seasonal variation of blue pigment (sandercyanin) in walleye (Sander vitreus)". Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 72 (2): 281–289. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0139 . ISSN   0706-652X.
  25. "1915 Protective colouring pyrotechnics British Soldier white overalls snow winter clothing uniform camouflage camouflaged". DijitalImaj. Retrieved 22 February 2013. Original publication in "The War Illustrated a Conflict of Nations"
  26. Ruxton, Graeme D; Speed, Michael P; Kelly, David J (2004). "What, if anything, is the adaptive function of countershading?" (PDF). Animal Behaviour. 68 (3): 445–451. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.009. S2CID   43106264.
  27. Cott, 1940. pp. 40–41.
  28. Forbes, 2009. pp. 149–150.
  29. Rowland, Hannah M. (2009). "Review From Abbott Thayer to the present day: what have we learned about the function of countershading?". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 364 (1516): 519–527. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0261. PMC   2674085 . PMID   19000972.
  30. Rowland, Hannah M (February 2009). "From Abbott Thayer to the present day: what have we learned about the function of countershading?". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 364 (1516): 519–527. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0261. PMC   2674085 . PMID   19000972.
  31. Nichols, Steve (2008). Malta Spitfire Aces. Osprey Publishing. p. 16.
  32. 1 2 3 Herring, 2002. pp. 190–195.
  33. "Midwater Squid, Abralia veranyi". Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
  34. Bush, Vannevar; Conant, James; Harrison, George; et al. (1946). Camouflage of Sea-Search Aircraft (PDF). Office of Scientific Research and Development, National Defence Research Committee. pp. 225–240. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2013. Retrieved 12 February 2013.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  35. Naish, D. "Green-boned glass frogs, monkey frogs, toothless toads". Tetrapod zoology. scienceblogs.com. Retrieved 14 February 2013.
  36. "American Art Native Americans George de Forest Brush Arapahoes" . Retrieved 4 September 2015. In 1916, Brush acquired a small Morane-Borel monoplane (also known as a Morane-Saulnier). He experimented with the possibility of making its wings and fuselage transparent, to reduce its visibility. See also the Etrich Taube, a 1910 design whose translucency effectively camouflaged it above 1200 feet (400 metres).Naughton, Russell (1 January 2002). "Igo Etrich (1879 - 1967) and his 'Taube'". Monash University.
  37. Wierauch, C (2006). "Anatomy of disguise: camouflaging structures in nymphs of Some Reduviidae (Heteroptera)" (PDF). American Museum Novitates (3542): 1–18. doi:10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3542[1:AODCSI]2.0.CO;2. hdl:2246/5820. S2CID   7894145.
  38. Hultgren, Kristin; Jay Stachowicz (2011). "Camouflage in decorator crabs: integrating ecological, behavioural and evolutionary approaches" (PDF). In Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita (eds.). Animal Camouflage. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-19911-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-08-15. Retrieved 2013-02-12.
  39. Forbes, 2009. pp. 102–103.
  40. MacKinnon, Kathy (1992). Nature's Treasurehouse: The Wildlife of Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. p. 38.
  41. Martin, Linda (21 July 2011). "New shark at The Deep heralds summer event". The Deep. Archived from the original on 10 August 2014. Retrieved 18 April 2013.
  42. Cott, 1940. p. 111.
  43. Cott, 1940. p. 75.
  44. Cott, 1940. pp. 341–342.
  45. Cott, 1940. pp. 359, 362.
  46. Vallin, A.; Jakobsson, S.; Lind, J.; Wiklund, C. (2005). "Prey survival by predator intimidation: an experimental study of peacock butterfly defence against blue tits". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 272 (1569): 1203–1207. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3034. PMC   1564111 . PMID   16024383.
  47. Cott, 1940. p. 373.
  48. "USS Northampton (CA-26, originally CL-26), 1930–1942". Naval Historical Center. 2002. Archived from the original on 21 July 2012. Retrieved 13 June 2012.
  49. Dimitrova, M.; Stobbe, N.; Schaefer, H. M.; Merilaita, S. (2009). "Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 276 (1663): 1905–1910. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0052. PMC   2674505 . PMID   19324754.
  50. Thayer, Gerald H.; Thayer, Abbott H. (1909). Concealing Coloration in the Animal Kingdom: An Exposition of the Laws of Disguise Through Color and Pattern; Being a Summary of Abbott H. Thayer's Disclosures. New York: Macmillan. pp.  151–152, 246–247.
  51. Forbes, 2009. p. 236.
  52. Forbes, 2009. pp. 236–239.
  53. "Innovation Adaptiv Car Signature". BAE Systems. 2012. Archived from the original on 18 June 2013. Retrieved 12 February 2013.
  54. Srinivasan, M. V.; Davey, M. (1995). "Strategies for active camouflage of motion". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 259 (1354): 19–25. Bibcode:1995RSPSB.259...19S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0004. S2CID   131341953.
  55. Ghose, K; Horiuchi, TK; Krishnaprasad, PS; Moss, CF (2006). "Echolocating Bats Use a Nearly Time-Optimal Strategy to Intercept Prey". PLOS Biology. 4 (5): e108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040108 . PMC   1436025 . PMID   16605303.
  56. 1 2 Scott-Samuel, NE; Baddeley, R; Palmer, CE; Cuthill, IC (June 2011). Burr, David C (ed.). "Dazzle Camouflage Affects Speed Perception". PLOS ONE. 6 (6): e20233. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...620233S. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020233 . PMC   3105982 . PMID   21673797.
  57. 1 2 How, Martin J.; Zanker, Johannes M. (2014). "Motion camouflage induced by zebra stripes" (PDF). Zoology. 117 (3): 163–70. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2013.10.004. PMID   24368147.
  58. Wilkinson, Norman (1969). A Brush with Life. Seeley Service. p. 79.
  59. Magazine, Smithsonian; Black, Riley. "Why Are Black Leopards So Rare?". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2023-08-15.
  60. Davis, Alexander L.; Thomas, Kate N.; Goetz, Freya E.; Robison, Bruce H.; Johnsen, Sönke; Osborn, Karen J. (2020). "Ultra-black Camouflage in Deep-Sea Fishes". Current Biology. 30 (17): 3470–3476.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.044 . ISSN   0960-9822. PMID   32679102.
  61. Stephenson, Hubert Kirk. (1948) Applied Physics, pp. 200, 258. Science in World War II; Office of Scientific Research and Development. Volume 6 of Science in World War II (Atlantic Monthly Press Book). Editors: Chauncey Guy Suits and George Russell Harrison. Little, Brown.

Bibliography