The Liverpool Court of Passage was, at the time of its abolition, a local court of record which actively exercised a civil jurisdiction comparable to or greater than that of the county court for the district in which it was situated.[1]
This court was granted by charters of Charles I and William III (Pat Rol, 2 Car 1, Part XV, No 8), granted 4 July 1626, 7 Will. 3, granted 26 September 1695. The name seems to be derived from the fact that the court was originally intended for causes arising out of the imports and exports passing through.[2] Up to 1853, all proceedings were entitled "in the borough court of Liverpool".[3]
Jurisdiction
The Liverpool Court of Passage had jurisdiction in personal actions to any amount where the defendant or one of the defendants resided or carried on business within the jurisdiction of the court, or by leave of the judge or registrar, when the whole or part of the cause of action arose within such jurisdiction, provided that, except where the whole cause of action arose within the jurisdiction, no action under £20, in which the county court had jurisdiction, could be commenced in this court.[4] The court also had jurisdiction to try all actions of ejectment between landlord and tenant wherein the annual rent of the premises in question did not exceed £100, and where no fine was reserved or made payable.[5][6]
In 1869 admiralty jurisdiction was conferred on the county court of Lancashire holden at Liverpool,[7] and consequently the Court of Passage acquired admiralty jurisdiction to the like extent.[8][9] The practice and procedure were regulated by the Rules of 1903, and were similar to those of the High Court.[10]
The Liverpool Court of Passage had an admiralty jurisdiction similar to and coterminus with that of the County Court of Lancashire at Liverpool.[8][11] An appeal lay from its decisions in admiralty and maritime causes to a divisional court of the Admiralty Division.[12][13][14][15][lower-alpha 1][16][17]
An Act to better define the Jurisdiction and to improve the Procedure of the Court of Passage in the City of Liverpool, and for other purposes connected therewith.
An Act to amend and render more effectual an Act passed in the Fourth and Fifth Year of the Reign of His present Majesty, intituled "An Act for amending the Proceedings and Practice of the Court of Passage of the Borough of Liverpool in the County Palatine of Lancaster"; and to repeal an Act passed in the Twenty-fifth Year of the Reign of His late Majesty King George the Second, intituled "An Act for the more easy and speedy Recovery of Small Debts in the Town and Port of Liverpool and Liberties thereof in the County Palatine of Lancaster;" and to give further Power for the Recovery of Small Debts within the Borough of Liverpool.
The Liverpool Court of Passage Procedure Act 1853[21] (16 & 17 Vict. c. xxi) is sometimes called the Liverpool Court of Passage Amendment Act 1853.[22] The act 4 & 5 Will. 4. c. xcii is sometimes called the Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1834.[23] The act 6 & 7 Will. 4. c. cxxxv is sometimes called the Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1836[24] The act 1 & 2 Vict. c. xcix is sometimes called the Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1838.[25]
Judge
The local act of 1834 provided for the appointment by the corporation of a barrister of seven years' standing. In 1893 the title of this judicial officer was changed to the "Presiding Judge of the Court of Passage",[26] with the same power, jurisdiction, and authority in regard to causes in the Court of Passage (subject to rules of court) as was possessed by a judge of the High Court sitting in chambers or at nisi prius.[27]
In case of the death, sickness, or unavoidable absence of the presiding judge, the recorder of Liverpool could act in lieu of him.[28][29]
Rules and procedure
The presiding judge had power, with the concurrence of the authority for the time being empowered to make rules for the Supreme Court, to adopt and apply to the Court of Passage any or all of the Rules of the Supreme Court, with such modifications, if any, as might be thought fit. Such rules were not to be invalid by reason of extending or otherwise affecting the jurisdiction of the Court of Passage.[30] Rules were made and confirmed under this power in 1903 and 1909.[31][32]
These rules practically assimilated the procedure of the court to that of the King's Bench and Admiralty Divisions of the High Court,[33] except that summary judgment under Ord 14 could not be obtained against a defendant who was a domestic or menial servant, a labourer, a servant in husbandry, a journeyman, an artificer, a handicraftsman, a miner, or any person engaged in manual labour.[34] The rules also contained tables of court fees and of solicitors' costs, and a scale of allowances to witnesses.[35][36]
The procedure of this court was amended by the Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 37) and the Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1896 (59 & 60 Vict. c. 21).
Removal of actions
Actions or matters could be removed from the Court of Passage by writ of certiorari or otherwise, if the High Court or a judge thereof deemed it desirable, upon such terms as to payment of costs, giving security, or otherwise as the High Court or a judge thereof thought fit to impose.[37] There was a power to remit actions of tort[38] commenced in the High Court to the Court of Passage when the plaintiff had no visible means of paying the defendant's costs, and the plaintiff failed to give security for such costs, or to satisfy a judge of the High Court that his action was fit to be prosecuted in the High Court.[39]
Actions of contract commenced in the High Court where the amount in dispute did not exceed £100 could be remitted to the Court of Passage in a similar manner as it might have been remitted to the county court.[40] Actions of contract commenced in the Court of Passage where the amount in dispute was less than £10 could be similarly transferred to the county court.[41] An appeal upon any issue tried in the Court of Passage was allowed under the same circumstances and rules as in the case of a trial at nisi prius.[42][43]
Officers
There was a registrar and a deputy registrar of the court, who had to be either practising barristers or practising solicitors of five years' standing. They were appointed by, and held their office during the pleasure of, the city council.[44] They had the powers (subject to rules of court) of a registrar, district registrar, master, taxing officer, and associate of the High Court.[45] There was an appeal from all orders, decisions and directions of the registrar and the presiding judge.[46][47]
Section 44(2) conferred a power to make regulations to provide for the compensation of persons who suffered loss of employment or loss or diminution of emoluments attributable to the effect of section 44(1)(b) or to the abolition of the Liverpool Court of Passage.
Transitional provisions
Transitional provisions were made by section 43(2) of, and Part III of Schedule 5 to the Courts Act 1971.
↑ In The Emilie Marron [1905] 2 KB 817, it would seem that the appeal was treated as coming from the common law side of the Court of Passage and taken direct to the Court of Appeal, the question of the jurisdiction not having been raised or argued.
Related Research Articles
His Majesty's High Court of Chivalry is a civil law court in English and Welsh law with jurisdiction over matters of heraldry. The court has been in existence since the fourteenth century; however, it rarely sits. The sole judge is now the hereditary Earl Marshal of England, the Duke of Norfolk, though if not a professional lawyer, he normally appoints a professional lawyer as his lieutenant or surrogate.
In certain jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom and other Westminster-influenced jurisdictions, as well as the United States and the Philippines, primary legislation has both a short title and a long title.
An Appropriation Act is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which, like a Consolidated Fund Act, allows the Treasury to issue funds out of the Consolidated Fund. Unlike a Consolidated Fund Act, an Appropriation Act also "appropriates" the funds, that is allocates the funds issued out of the Consolidated Fund to individual government departments and Crown bodies. Appropriation Acts were formerly passed by the Parliament of Great Britain.
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1730 is an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain that regulates certain aspects of the relationship between tenants and their landlords.
Statute Law Revision Act is a stock short title which has been used in Antigua, Australia, Barbados, Bermuda, Canada, Ghana, the Republic of Ireland, South Africa and the United Kingdom, for Acts with the purpose of statute law revision. Such Acts normally repealed legislation which was expired, spent, repealed in general terms, virtually repealed, superseded, obsolete or unnecessary. In the United Kingdom, Statute Law (Repeals) Acts are now passed instead. "Statute Law Revision Acts" may collectively refer to enactments with this short title.
The Court of Chancery of the County Palatine of Lancaster was a court of chancery that exercised jurisdiction within the County Palatine of Lancaster until it was merged with the High Court and abolished in 1972.
The Piracy Act 1850, sometimes called the Pirates Repeal Act 1850, is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It relates to proceedings for the condemnation of ships and other things taken from pirates and creates an offence of perjury in such proceedings.
The Court of Chancery of the County Palatine of Durham and Sadberge was a court of chancery that exercised jurisdiction within the County Palatine of Durham until it was merged into the High Court in 1972.
The Norwich Guildhall Court was, at the time of its abolition, a local court of record which actively exercised a civil jurisdiction comparable to or greater than that of the county court for the district in which it was situated. The court appears to have originated in a court of husting, on the model of that of London.
The Statute Law Revision Act 1893 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Cotton said this Act is the twenty-second Statute Law Revision Act.
The Statute Law Revision Act 1875 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Bill for this Act was the Statute Law Revision Bill.
The Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1881 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Bill for this Act was the Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Bill.
The Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1883 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Bill for this Act was the Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Bill.
The Limitation Act 1623, sometimes called the Statute of Limitations 1623, was an Act of the Parliament of England.
The Court of Pleas of the County Palatine of Durham and Sadberge, sometimes called the Court of Pleas or Common Pleas of or at Durham was a court of common pleas that exercised jurisdiction within the County Palatine of Durham until its jurisdiction was transferred to the High Court by the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873. Before the transfer of its jurisdiction, this tribunal was next in importance to the Chancery of Durham. The Court of Pleas probably developed from the free court of the Bishop of Durham. The Court of Pleas was clearly visible as a distinct court, separate from the Chancery, in the thirteenth century.
Certain former courts of England and Wales have been abolished or merged into or with other courts, and certain other courts of England and Wales have fallen into disuse.
The Act 16 Cha. 1. c. 11, sometimes referred to as the Ecclesiastical Causes Act 1640, the Abolition of High Commission Court Act 1640, the High Commission Abolition Act 1641, the Abolition of the Court of High Commission Act, the High Commission Court Abolition Act, the Act for the Abolition of the High Commission, the Act for the Abolition of the High Commission Court, or the Act for the Abolition of the Court of High Commission, was an Act of the Parliament of England, passed by the Long Parliament. It abolished the Court of High Commission and repealed the clause in the Act of Supremacy 1558 that gave the Court legal authority. Horder said the Act 16 Cha. 1. c. 11 is "important". It is a precursor to the Self-Incrimination Clause which is included in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
References
Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, Butterworth & Co, London, (Agents for Canada: Canada Law Book Company, Toronto), 1909, Volume 9, paragraphs 382 to 386, at pages 173 to 176. See also pages 129 and 136 for a discussion of the general characteristics of borough and local courts of record.
Renton and Robertson (eds). "Passage Court of Liverpool". Encyclopædia of the Laws of England. Second Edition. 1908. Volume 10. Pages 565 to 566. First Edition. 1898. Volume 9. Pages 494 and 496.
"Liverpool Court of Passage". The English and Empire Digest. Butterworth & Co. 1923. Volume 16. Pages 199 and 200.
Walter Peel. The Jurisdiction and Practice of the Court of Passage of the City of Liverpool. Henry Young and Sons. Liverpool. 1909. Revised Edition. 1934.
J H Layton. The Court of Passage of the City of Liverpool. Liverpool Central Stationery and Print Co. 1904.
Charles Russell. The Practice of the Court of Passage of the Borough of Liverpool. Rockliff Bros. Liverpool. 1862.
Vick and Shoolbred. "Liverpool Court of Passage". The Administration of Civil Justice in England and Wales. Pergamon Press. 1968. Pages 153 and 154.
Walter Peel, "The Liverpool Court of Passage" (1918) 70 Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire 43
"Liverpool Court of Passage". Guide to Government Orders as at 31st December, 1960. HMSO. 1961. p 538.
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Procedure Act 1853 (16 & 17 Vict. c. xxi), section 48. As to the admiralty jurisdiction of the Court of Passage, see Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, vol 1, title "Admiralty", p 140. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, footnote r.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, pp 173 & 174, para 382
↑ Archibald and Vizard, The Practice at Judges Chambers, 2nd Ed, 1886, p 392
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 37), section 6. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, footnote b.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, para 382
↑ 4 & 5 Will. 4. c. xcii, section 2. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, footnote c.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, para 382
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 37), section 8. As to the power to make rules, see R v Liverpool Corporation (1887) 18 QBD 510. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, footnote d.
↑ The 1903 Rules were published by the corporation of Liverpool. For the 1909 Rules see [1909] WN, Pt II, p 123. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, footnote e.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, para 383
↑ The following is a list of the Rules of the Supreme Court, reproduced in the Rules of the Liverpool Court of Passage: Ord 1, r 1; Ord 2, rr 1 to 3, 7 and 8; Ord 3, rr 1 to 4, 6 and 7; Ord 4, rr 1 and 2; Ord 5, rr 3, 10 to 13, 16 and 17; Ord 6, r 1; Ord 7, rr 1 and 3; Ord 8; Ord 9, rr 1 to 5 and 8 to 15; Ord 10; Ord 11 (adapted); Ord 12, rr 8 to 14, 17 to 22 and 24 to 30; Ord 13, rr 1 to 10 and 12 to 14; Ord 14; Ord 16, rr 1 to 9, 11 to 13, 16 to 31 and 48 to 55; Ord 17; Ord 18; Ord 18A; Ord 19; Ord 20, rr 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7; Ord 21, rr 1 to 7 and 9 to 21; Ord 22, rr 1 to 9, 11, 13 to 16 and 20 to 22; Ord 23; Ord 24; Ord 25, rr 1 to 4; Ord 26; Ord 27, rr 1 to 9 and 11 to 15; Ord 28; Ord 29, rr 1 to 8, 10 to 12 and 14 to 18; Ord 30; Ord 31; Ord 32; Ord 33, r 1; Ord 34, rr 1 to 7 and 9 to 12; Ord 35, r 8; Ord 36, rr 2, 4 to 8, 11 to 19, 22B, 28, 30 to 34, 36 to 40, 42, 43 and 56 to 58; Ord 37, rr 1 to 35; Ord 38, rr 1 to 19 and 21 to 24; Ord 39; Ord 40, rr 1 to 9; Ord 41, rr 1 and 3 to 10; Ord 42, rr 1, 2, 5 to 9, 11 to 24 and 26 to 34; Ord 43, rr 1 to 4 and 8 to 13; Ord 44; Ord 45; Ord 47; Ord 48; Ord 48A, rr 1 to 10; Ord 49, r 8; Ord 50, r 1 to 8, 11 and 12; Ord 51, rr 14 to 16; Ord 52, rr 1 to 11, 13, 14 and 23; Ord 53; Ord 54, rr 1 to 12, 20, 22 and 26 to 29; Ord 56; Ord 57, rr 1 to 13 and 15 to 17; Ord 59, r 3; Ord 61, rr 6, 7, 16 and 20; Ord 64; Ord 65, rr 1, 2, 5 to 7, 11, 13 to 17, 23 and 27 (in part); Ord 66, rr 1, 2, 4 and 7 (in part), 8 and 9; Ord 67, rr 1 to 7 and 9 to 14; Ord 70; Ord 71 (adapted); and Ord 72, r 2. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, pp 174 & 175, footnote f.
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Rules 1909, Ord 14, rule 9. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, footnote g.
↑ There were three scales of fees and costs: higher scale where the amount recovered exceeded £50; middle scale where in contract the amount recovered was not less than £20, and in tort than £10; lower scale where the amount recovered was less. The higher scale was based on the lower scale of the High Court, and the middle and lower on the county court scales, B and A. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, footnote h.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, pp 174 & 175, para 383
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 37), section 5. The defendant's common law right to remove an action by certiorari was not taken away (Edwards v Liverpool Corporation (1902) 86 LT 627). Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, footnote i.
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 37), section 4. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, footnote j.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, para 384
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 37), section 3; see also Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, vol 8, title "County courts", p 438. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, footnote k.
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1896 (59 & 60 Vict. c. 21), section 4. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, footnote l.
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 37), section 10. An application lay to the Court of Appeal for a new trial of an interpleader issue or any other issue under this section (Coates v Moore [1903] 2 KB 140, CA). The judge of the Court of Passage could give leave to appeal in any case in which a judge at chambers had power to do so (Hunter v Jacobsen (1899) 80 LT 641, CA). An appeal on an application for a new trial was to the Court of Appeal (Anderson v Dean [1894] 2 QB 222, CA. As to procedure in appeal, see Bridge v Daine (1873) 29 LT 477. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, footnote m.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 175, para 384
↑ The Liverpool Improvement Act 1886 (49 & 50 Vict. c. lxxx), section 29. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 176, footnote n.
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c 37), section 7. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 176, footnote o.
↑ The Liverpool Court of Passage Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 37), section 9. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 176, footnote p.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, pp 175 & 176, para 385
↑ See Appendix to the Report of the Municipal Corporations Commissioners, 1835, Part 4, pp 2689 to 2713. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 176, footnote q.
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 176, para 385
↑ Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, para 382
↑ Civil Judicial Statistics, 1905, Parliamentary Paper, 1907 [C 3477], p 164. Halsbury's Laws of England, First Edition, 1909, vol 9, p 174, footnote s.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
