Marc Hauser

Last updated

Marc Hauser
Marc Hauser, 2008 (cropped).jpg
Hauser in 2008
Born (1959-10-25) October 25, 1959 (age 64)
NationalityAmerican
CitizenshipUnited States
Known forScientific research misconduct
Scientific career
Fields Biology, Primate behavior, Animal cognition, Neuroscience, Evolutionary psychology
Institutions Harvard University
Marc Hauser sitting between Jon Meacham (far left) and Daniel Dennett (center), World Science Festival Science of Morality - World Science Festival - 92 St Y (2534904279).jpg
Marc Hauser sitting between Jon Meacham (far left) and Daniel Dennett (center), World Science Festival

Marc D. Hauser (born October 25, 1959) is an American evolutionary biologist and a researcher in primate behavior, animal cognition and human behavior and neuroscience. Hauser was a professor of psychology at Harvard University from 1998 to 2011. In 2010 Harvard found him guilty of research misconduct, specifically fabricating and falsifying data, after which he resigned. [1] [2] [3] Because Hauser's research was financed by government grants, the Office of Research Integrity of the Health and Human Services Department also investigated, finding in 2012 that Hauser had fabricated data, manipulated experimental results, and published falsified findings. [4]

Contents

Research and publications

Hauser's research topics include evolutionary biology, cognitive neuroscience, cognitive evolution, and language evolution. [5] Hauser's internet-based 'The Moral Sense Test' involved presenting participants a series of hypothetical moral dilemmas and requesting them to provide a judgment. [6] Since his resignation from Harvard, Hauser has continued to publish his research in the fields of cognitive neuroscience and comparative psychology [7] and also in the field of education. [8]

Books and essays

Books

Scientific misconduct

In 2007, Harvard University announced an internal investigation of alleged scientific misconduct by Hauser. On August 20, 2010, Michael Smith, Dean of Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences, released a statement confirming that an internal investigation had found Hauser guilty of eight counts of scientific misconduct. [14] Three counts involved published papers, and five involved unpublished studies. The statement said that Harvard was cooperating with further investigations by the US Office of Research Integrity, the National Science Foundation Office of Inspector General, and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. They stated that they would conduct their own review and make their conclusions available to the public. [15] [2]

While Harvard confirmed that Hauser committed misconduct, scientists continued to criticize Harvard over a lack of transparency in the investigation. However, Harvard stated that "in cases where the government concludes scientific misconduct occurred, the federal agency makes those findings publicly available." [16] The lack of transparency evoked substantial speculation. Writing in The New York Times in August 2010, Nicholas Wade summarized:

There is a wide spectrum of scientific sins, ranging from wrist-slap offenses like bad data storage at one end, to data fabrication at the other. It is still not clear where on this spectrum Dr. Hauser's errors may fall. He has admitted only to unspecified "mistakes," not to misconduct. [17]

Although Hauser took a year-long leave of absence from Harvard in 2010, he was at first still planning to teach at the Harvard Extension School, which generated further controversy. On September 1, 2010, his classes at the Extension School were canceled. [18] In April 2011, he was barred from teaching in the Psychology department or any other Arts and Sciences department. [19] In July 2011, Hauser resigned his faculty position at Harvard, effective August 1, 2011. [3] In his resignation, Hauser stated that he had "some exciting opportunities in the private sector" involving education for high-risk teenagers, but that he might go back to academia "in the years to come." [20]

In September 2012, after conducting a separate investigation, the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) found Hauser guilty of scientific misconduct. [4] They concluded that Hauser had fabricated data in one study, manipulated results in multiple experiments, and incorrectly described how studies were conducted. The ORI barred Hauser from certain types of research and required that other research be conducted under supervision. [21] They published a notice stating:

Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) has taken final action in the following case:
Marc Hauser, Ph.D., Harvard University: ORI found that Dr. Marc Hauser … engaged in research misconduct in research supported by

In two additional published papers, some field notes or video recordings were "incomplete", although Hauser and his co-author replicated the experiments. [23] [24] The Proceedings of the Royal Society published the replication of the missing data in an addendum to one of the papers. [24] In April 2011 Hauser and Justin Wood (coauthor of the original paper) replicated the results of the 2007 Science study and published them—as an addendum—in the journal. [25] [26]

Unreplicable cotton-top tamarin study

In 1995, Hauser reported that cotton-top tamarins can recognize themselves in a mirror. [27] Gordon G. Gallup questioned Hauser's findings, and reviewed some video recordings of Hauser's experiment, saying that "when I played the videotapes [for Hauser's experiments], there was not a thread of compelling evidence — scientific or otherwise — that any of the tamarins had learned to correctly decipher mirrored information about themselves. [28] Upon requesting the remaining videotapes, Gallup was informed that the other tapes had been stolen. [29] Together with Anderson, Gallup published a critical response to Hauser's article. [30] Their criticism of Hauser's paper stated that the coding criteria were described in insufficient detail to code the monkeys' behavior and that, according to their assessment, the cotton-top tamarins did not show the behavior that they considered as evidence for mirror recognition in chimpanzees or other great apes. [30]

Hauser and a co-author published a reply to these criticisms, clarifying their coding criteria. [31] However, in 2001 Hauser reported that his subsequent attempts to replicate the experiments were unsuccessful, observing no evidence for the previously claimed result. [32]

The paper was published in the journal Cognition in 2002 and was later retracted. [28] [33]

Additional reactions

In August 2010, after the initial allegations came out, various publications published other accusations and speculations about Hauser's research, often citing reports by his former students and research assistants.

Michael Tomasello, another well-known animal cognition researcher, claimed that some of Hauser's previous students personally told him that there "was a pattern and they had specific evidence". [34] Tomasello also stated, prior to the official announcement, that he had information from "a Harvard faculty member and from former students of Dr. Hauser" that the investigation found evidence for eight counts of scientific misconduct; [34] this statement was later confirmed by Harvard's dean (see previous section). [35]

The Chronicle of Higher Education reported the contents of allegations made by a former research assistant of Hauser. The former research assistant stated that Hauser falsely coded videotapes of monkey behavior, resisted research assistants and students' requests to have them re-coded by another observer and pressured his students to accept his data analysis. When they re-coded the data without Hauser's permission, they allegedly found Hauser's coding bore little relation to what was on the tapes. According to the document, several other lab members had similar run-ins with Hauser. [36]

An article in New Scientist claimed that Harvard opened its investigation of Hauser's lab after students who had worked there made allegations of data falsification. [37]

Gerry Altmann, the editor of Cognition, subsequently posted his personal conclusion that Hauser fabricated data as part of a deception, after being given a summary of the relevant portions of Harvard's inquiry. [38] [39] [40] [41] Altmann noted that the conclusion of fabrication was his own conjecture, and not that of the Harvard investigation, which offered no explanation for discrepancies between the video record and the published paper. [38]

Charles Gross published an article in The Nation that detailed the Hauser case (Disgrace: On Marc Hauser. A case of scientific misconduct at Harvard). [42]

See also

Related Research Articles

Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the publication of professional scientific research.

Bubble fusion is the non-technical name for a nuclear fusion reaction hypothesized to occur inside extraordinarily large collapsing gas bubbles created in a liquid during acoustic cavitation. The more technical name is sonofusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Primatology</span> Scientific study of primates

Primatology is the scientific study of primates. It is a diverse discipline at the boundary between mammalogy and anthropology, and researchers can be found in academic departments of anatomy, anthropology, biology, medicine, psychology, veterinary sciences and zoology, as well as in animal sanctuaries, biomedical research facilities, museums and zoos. Primatologists study both living and extinct primates in their natural habitats and in laboratories by conducting field studies and experiments in order to understand aspects of their evolution and behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Baltimore</span> American biologist (born 1938)

David Baltimore is an American biologist, university administrator, and 1975 Nobel laureate in Physiology or Medicine. He is a professor of biology at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), where he served as president from 1997 to 2006. He founded the Whitehead Institute and directed it from 1982 to 1990. In 2008, he served as president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2008.

In academic publishing, a retraction is a mechanism by which a published paper in an academic journal is flagged for being seriously flawed to the extent that their results and conclusions can no longer be relied upon. Retracted articles are not removed from the published literature but marked as retracted. In some cases it may be necessary to remove an article from publication, such as when the article is clearly defamatory, violates personal privacy, is the subject of a court order, or might pose a serious health risk to the general public.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mirror test</span> Animal self-awareness test to determine self-recognition in a mirror

The mirror test—sometimes called the mark test, mirror self-recognition (MSR) test, red spot technique, or rouge test—is a behavioral technique developed in 1970 by American psychologist Gordon Gallup Jr. as an attempt to determine whether an animal possesses the ability of visual self-recognition. The MSR test is the traditional method for attempting to measure physiological and cognitive self-awareness. However, agreement has been reached that animals can be self-aware in ways not measured by the mirror test, such as distinguishing between their own and others' songs and scents.

Eric T. Poehlman, is an American scientist, formerly researching in the field of human obesity and aging. In 2000, Poehlman was investigated for scientific misconduct; the case continued for several years and in 2005, he admitted to fraudulent research practices. He had published research using falsified and fabricated data in studies on aging metabolism and obesity, including purporting to show beneficial effects on lipid profiles and abdominal fat in menopausal women being treated with hormone therapy. Poehlman became the first academic in the United States to be jailed for falsifying data in a grant application.

John Roland Darsee is an American physician and former medical researcher. After compiling an impressive list of publications in reputable scientific journals, he was found to have fabricated data for his publications.

Luk Van Parijs was an associate professor of biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Center for Cancer Research. After investigating for a year, MIT fired Van Parijs for research misconduct. Van Parijs admitted to fabricating and falsifying research data in a paper, several unpublished manuscripts, and grant applications. In March 2011, Van Parijs pleaded guilty in a U.S. District Court in Boston to one count of making a false statement on a federal grant application. The government asked Judge Denise Casper for a 6-month jail term because of the seriousness of the fraud, which involved a $2-million grant. After several prominent scientists including Van Parijs' former post-doc supervisor pleading for clemency on his behalf, on 13 June, Van Parijs was finally sentenced six months of home detention with electronic monitoring, plus 400 hours of community service and a payment to MIT of $61,117 - restitution for the already-spent grant money that MIT had to return to the National Institutes of Health.

In scientific inquiry and academic research, data fabrication is the intentional misrepresentation of research results. As with other forms of scientific misconduct, it is the intent to deceive that marks fabrication as unethical, and thus different from scientists deceiving themselves. There are many ways data can be fabricated. Experimental data can be fabricated by reporting experiments that were never conducted, and accurate data can be manipulated or misrepresented to suit a desired outcome. One of the biggest problems with this form of scientific fraud is that "university investigations into research misconduct are often inadequate, opaque and poorly conducted. They challenge the idea that institutions can police themselves on research integrity."

Primate cognition is the study of the intellectual and behavioral skills of non-human primates, particularly in the fields of psychology, behavioral biology, primatology, and anthropology.

Diederik Alexander Stapel is a Dutch former professor of social psychology at Tilburg University. In 2011 Tilburg University suspended Stapel for fabricating and manipulating data for his research publications. This scientific misconduct took place over a number of years and affected dozens of his publications. By 2015, fifty-eight of Stapel's publications had been retracted. He has been described in coverage by the New York Times as "the biggest con man in academic science".

Dipak Kumar Das was the director of the Cardiovascular Research Center at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington and is known for research fraud. His work centered on the beneficial properties of resveratrol, which is found in red wine, but over twenty of his research papers have been since retracted.

Invalid science consists of scientific claims based on experiments that cannot be reproduced or that are contradicted by experiments that can be reproduced. Recent analyses indicate that the proportion of retracted claims in the scientific literature is steadily increasing. The number of retractions has grown tenfold over the past decade, but they still make up approximately 0.2% of the 1.4m papers published annually in scholarly journals.

Haruko Obokata is a former stem-cell biologist and research unit leader at Japan's Laboratory for Cellular Reprogramming, Riken Center for Developmental Biology. She claimed in 2014 to have developed a radical and remarkably easy way to generate stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP) cells that could be grown into tissue for use anywhere in the body. In response to allegations of irregularities in Obokata's research publications involving STAP cells, Riken launched an investigation that discovered examples of scientific misconduct on the part of Obokata. Attempts to replicate Obokata's STAP cell results failed. The ensuing STAP cell scandal gained worldwide attention.

Amy J. Wagers is the Forst Family Professor of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology at Harvard University and Harvard Medical School, an investigator in islet cell and regenerative biology at the Joslin Diabetes Center, and principal faculty of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute. She is co-chair of the Department of Stem Cells and Regenerative Biology at Harvard Medical School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Replication crisis</span> Observed inability to reproduce scientific studies

The replication crisis is an ongoing methodological crisis in which the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to reproduce. Because the reproducibility of empirical results is an essential part of the scientific method, such failures undermine the credibility of theories building on them and potentially call into question substantial parts of scientific knowledge.

Annarosa Leri is a medical doctor and former associate professor at Harvard University. Along with former professor Piero Anversa, Leri was engaged in biomedical research at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, an affiliate of Harvard Medical School. Since at least 2003 Anversa and Leri had investigated the ability of the heart to regenerate damaged cells using cardiac stem cells.

References

  1. ↑ Wade, Nicholas (August 20, 2010). "Harvard Finds Marc Hauser Guilty of Scientific Misconduct". The New York Times.
  2. 1 2 "Marc Hauser's Fall From Grace". The Harvard Crimson . September 14, 2010. Retrieved October 5, 2014.
  3. 1 2 Kumar, Gautam; Julia Ryan (July 19, 2011). "Embattled Professor Marc Hauser Will Resign from Harvard". Harvard Crimson . Retrieved October 27, 2011.
  4. 1 2 Johnson, C., 2012. Former Harvard professor Marc Hauser fabricated, manipulated data, US says Boston Globe [online] September 5 [Accessed September 12, 2012]
  5. ↑ Marc D. Hauser; Noam Chomsky; W. Tecumseh Fitch (2002). "The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?". Science. 298 (5598): 1569–79. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569. PMID   12446899.
  6. ↑ "The Moral Sense Test". harvard.edu. Archived from the original on October 22, 2014. Retrieved October 5, 2014.
  7. ↑ Froesel, Mathilda; Goudard, Quentin; Hauser, Marc; Gacoin, Maëva; Ben Hamed, Suliann (October 21, 2020). "Automated video-based heart rate tracking for the anesthetized and behaving monkey". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 17940. Bibcode:2020NatSR..1017940F. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74954-5. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   7578008 . PMID   33087832.
  8. ↑ Hauser, Marc D. (2021). "How Early Life Adversity Transforms the Learning Brain". Mind, Brain, and Education. 15: 35–47. doi:10.1111/mbe.12277. S2CID   230601439.
  9. ↑ Hauser, Marc (2000). The Evolution of Communication. ISBN   0262082500.
  10. ↑ Hauser, Marc (2000). Wild Minds. Harper Collins. ISBN   0060780703.
  11. ↑ Hauser, Marc (2006). Moral Minds. ISBN   0805056696.
  12. ↑ Evilicious contents Archived December 5, 2013, at archive.today on Hauser's website
  13. ↑ Discussion by Retraction Watch, a blog that tracked the earlier research controversy, and puts the book's mixed reviews in context.
  14. ↑ "FAS Dean Smith Confirms Scientific Misconduct by Marc Hauser". Harvard Magazine. August 20, 2010. Retrieved August 26, 2010.
  15. ↑ "Harvard Confirms 'Hausergate'". Chronicle of Higher Education. August 12, 2010. Retrieved August 26, 2010.
  16. ↑ Wade, Nicholas (August 12, 2010). "Inquiry on Harvard Lab Threatens Ripple Effect". The New York Times.
  17. ↑ Wade, Nicholas (August 20, 2010). "Harvard Finds Scientist Guilty of Misconduct". The New York Times .
  18. ↑ Johnson, Carolyn Y. (September 1, 2010). "Citing misconduct inquiry, Harvard professor cancels classes". The Boston Globe.
  19. ↑ "Embattled Harvard professor barred from teaching". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on October 6, 2011.
  20. ↑ Bartlett, Tom (July 19, 2011). "Marc Hauser Resigns From Harvard". Chronicle of Higher Education . Retrieved October 27, 2011.
  21. ↑ NIH, 2012. Findings of Research Misconduct Press release, September 10, 2012 [Accessed September 12, 2012]
  22. ↑ "Findings of Research Misconduct". federalregister.gov. September 6, 2012. Retrieved October 5, 2014.
  23. ↑ Wade, Nicholas (August 12, 2010). "Inquiry on Harvard Lab Threatens Ripple Effect". The New York Times .
  24. 1 2 Hauser MD, Wood JN (2011). "Replication of 'Rhesus monkeys correctly read the goal-relevant gestures of a human agent'". Proc. Biol. Sci. 278 (1702): 158–9. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1441. PMC   2992735 . PMID   21155189.
  25. ↑ Miller, Greg (April 25, 2011). "Science Publishes Replication of 2007 Hauser Study". Science . Retrieved May 3, 2011.
  26. ↑ Wood, J. N.; Glynn, D. D.; Phillips, B. C.; Hauser, M. D. (2007). "The Perception of Rational, Goal-Directed Action in Nonhuman Primates". Science. 317 (5843): 1402–1405. Bibcode:2007Sci...317.1402W. doi:10.1126/science.1144663. PMID   17823353. S2CID   18180566.
  27. ↑ Hauser, M; J. Kralik; C. Borro-Mahan; M. Garret; J. Oser (November 1995). "Self-recognition in primates: Phylogeny and the salience of species-typical features". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 92 (23): 10811–10814. Bibcode:1995PNAS...9210811H. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10811 . PMC   40702 . PMID   7479889.
  28. 1 2 Johnson, Carolyn (August 10, 2010). "Author on leave after Harvard inquiry". The Boston Globe .
  29. ↑ "Scientific misconduct: Monkey business?". Economist. August 26, 2010. Retrieved August 28, 2010.
  30. 1 2 Anderson, JR; Gallup (1997). "Self-recognition in Saguinus? A critical essay". Anim Behav. 54 (6): 1563–7. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0548. PMID   9521801. S2CID   140206432.
  31. ↑ Hauser, MD; J. Kralik (December 1997). "Life beyond the mirror: a reply to Anderson & Gallup". Animal Behaviour. 54 (6): 1568–1571. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0549. PMID   9521802. S2CID   22836237.
  32. ↑ Hauser, Marc; Cory Thomas Miller; Katie Liu; Renu Gupta (March 2001). "Cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) fail to show mirror-guided self-exploration". American Journal of Primatology. 53 (3): 131–137. doi:10.1002/1098-2345(200103)53:3<131::AID-AJP4>3.0.CO;2-X. PMID   11253848. S2CID   17250348.
  33. ↑ "Monkey business? 2002 Cognition paper retracted as prominent psychologist Marc Hauser takes leave from Harvard". RetractionWatch. August 10, 2010. Retrieved August 26, 2010.
  34. 1 2 Wade, Nicholas (August 13, 2010). "In Inquiry at Marc Hauser's Harvard Lab, a Raid and Then a 3-Year Wait". The New York Times. p. 2.
  35. ↑ "Updated: Harvard says Marc Hauser guilty of science misconduct". USA Today. August 20, 2010. Retrieved August 26, 2010.
  36. ↑ Bartlett, Tom (August 19, 2010). "Document Sheds Light on Investigation at Harvard". The Chronicle of Higher Education . Retrieved August 21, 2010.
  37. ↑ Aldhous, Peter (August 20, 2010). "Misconduct probe in Harvard animal morality lab". New Scientist.
  38. 1 2 Altmann, Gerry. "Harvard misconduct: setting the record straight". Archived from the original on September 2, 2010. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  39. ↑ Miller, Greg (August 27, 2010). "Journal Editor Says He Believes Retracted Hauser Paper Contains Fabricated Data". Science Insider. Archived from the original on August 29, 2010. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  40. ↑ Johnson, Carolyn (August 27, 2010). "Journal editor questions Harvard researcher's data". The Boston Globe. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  41. ↑ Wade, Nicholas (August 27, 2010). "Harvard Researcher May Have Fabricated Data". The New York Times. Retrieved August 27, 2010.
  42. ↑ Gross, Charles (December 21, 2011). "Disgrace: On Marc Hauser". The Nation.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.