Medicaid coverage gap

Last updated

ACA Medicaid expansion by state. .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Not adopted Adopted Implemented Medicaid expansion map of US. Affordable Care Act.svg
ACA Medicaid expansion by state.
  Not adopted
  Adopted
  Implemented

In the context of American public healthcare policy, the Medicaid coverage gap refers to uninsured people who do not qualify for marketplace assistance under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and reside in states that have not adopted Medicaid expansion under the ACA. People within this categorization have incomes above the eligibility limits for Medicaid set by their state of residence but fall below the federal poverty line (FPL), resulting in deficient access to affordable health insurance. As of March 2023, an estimated 1.9 million Americans in 10 states are within the Medicaid coverage gap according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Approximately 97 percent of this cohort lives in the Southern U.S., with a majority living in Texas and Florida; Texas has the largest population of people in the cohort, accounting for 41 percent of people in the coverage gap. [2]

Contents

Expansion of Medicaid was a key aspect of the ACA when it was signed into law by President Barack Obama in March 2010, supporting the legislation's goal of ensuring universal health care in the U.S. by raising the income threshold for Medicaid eligibility to 138 percent of the FPL among nonelderly adults. States choosing to participate in Medicaid expansion would also have additional Medicaid costs fully covered by the federal government in the first three years of expansion slated to begin in 2014, with a stepwise decrease in the federal government's share to 90 percent in 2020 and thereafter. Opponents of the legislation asserted that the federal government's conditioning of additional funding for Medicaid on adoption of expansion was unconstitutionally coercive. The Supreme Court held in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius that adoption of Medicaid expansion by states was effectively optional, and that states could continue with their preexisting Medicaid requirements without risk of defunding. The decision not to implement Medicaid expansion in some states after the ACA took effect in 2014 led to a "gap" in coverage for residents of those states with incomes too low for subsidized insurance in the ACA's newly established health insurance marketplaces and incomes too high to qualify for the non-expanded Medicaid in their states. Only 24 states adopted Medicaid expansion when ACA initially took effect. As of March 2023, 40 states and the District of Columbia have adopted Medicaid expansion, leaving 10 states that have not.

Population characteristics

As initially passed, the ACA was designed to provide universal health care in the U.S.: those with employer-sponsored health insurance would keep their plans, those with middle-income and lacking employer-sponsored health insurance could purchase subsidized insurance via newly established health insurance marketplaces, and those with low-income would be covered by the expansion of Medicaid. However, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012) rendered state adoption of Medicaid expansion optional. Governors in several Republican-leaning states announced that they would not expand Medicaid in response, leading to a gap in insurance coverage. [3] The Medicaid coverage gap includes nonelderly people with incomes that are below the federal poverty line (FPL), making them ineligible for subsidized marketplace insurance under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), but have incomes higher than their state's limit for Medicaid eligibility as their state has not adopted Medicaid expansion as prescribed by the ACA. [4] [2] The gap also includes childless adults who are ineligible for Medicaid regardless of income in these states (with the exception of Wisconsin, which permits Medicaid coverage via waiver). [2]

As of March 2023, an estimated 1.9 million people are in the Medicaid coverage gap, residing in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Out of the cohort, 97 percent live in the Southern United States where most of the non-expansion states are located, with Texas, Florida, and Georgia accounting for nearly three-quarters of the Medicaid coverage gap. Childless adults account for 76 percent of the coverage gap, and people of color account for around 61 percent of the cohort. Within the ten states that have not opted for Medicaid expansion, the median income limit for eligibility in the traditional Medicaid program is 38 percent of the FPL. [lower-alpha 1] The uninsured rate within the non-expansion states was 15.4 percent in March 2023 compared to 8.1 percent in expansion states. [2]

Medicaid expansion

Medicaid expansion by state [1]
SubdivisionStatusImplemented
Alabama Not adopted—
Alaska ImplementedSeptember 1, 2015
Arizona ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Arkansas ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
California ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Colorado ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Connecticut ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Delaware ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
District of Columbia ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Florida Not adopted—
Georgia Not adopted—
Hawaii ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Idaho ImplementedJanuary 1, 2020
Illinois ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Indiana ImplementedFebruary 1, 2015
Iowa ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Kansas Not adopted—
Kentucky ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Louisiana ImplementedJuly 1, 2016
Maine ImplementedJanuary 10, 2019
Maryland ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Massachusetts ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Michigan ImplementedApril 1, 2014
Minnesota ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Mississippi Not adopted—
Missouri ImplementedOctober 1, 2021
Montana ImplementedJanuary 1, 2016
Nebraska ImplementedOctober 1, 2020
Nevada ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
New Hampshire ImplementedAugust 15, 2014
New Jersey ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
New York ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
North Carolina ImplementedDecember 1, 2023
North Dakota ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Ohio ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Oklahoma ImplementedJuly 1, 2021
Pennsylvania ImplementedJanuary 1, 2015
Rhode Island ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
South Carolina Not adopted—
South Dakota ImplementedJuly 1, 2023
Tennessee Not adopted—
Texas Not adopted—
Utah ImplementedJanuary 1, 2020
Vermont ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Virginia ImplementedJanuary 1, 2019
Washington ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
West Virginia ImplementedJanuary 1, 2014
Wisconsin Not adopted—
Wyoming Not adopted—
Uninsured rates in the U.S.
Uninsured Rate Comparing Medicaid Expansion States vs. Non Expansion.png
Comparison of uninsured rates between states based on their Medicaid expansion participation in 2017 and 2018
Percentage of Individuals in the United States Without Health Insurance, 1963-2015.png
Percentage of individuals in the U.S. without health insurance between 1963–2015

Affordable Care Act provision

Prior to passage of the ACA, Medicaid did not extend general eligibility to low-income adults without child dependants, [5] though the federal government could authorize waivers for states to expand medicaid coverage; [6] : 2  by 2012, eight states provided full Medicaid benefits to this group. [7] The Medicaid statute also permitted states to cover some cohorts (termed "optional eligibility groups") without a permit. [6] : 2  However, some states set stringent income eligibility thresholds well below the federal poverty level (FPL) for caretakers and parents of minors. [5] In line with its previous efforts to curtain the expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), the Bush administration imposed additional restrictions on states attempting to raise the income cap for Medicaid eligibility in 2008. [8] Healthcare reform was a key issue in campaigns for the 2008 United States presidential election. [9] A poll of delegates conducted by the New York Times and CBS News found that 94 percent of Democratic delegates viewed expanding healthcare coverage to all Americans as more important than lowering taxes, compared to 7 percent for Republican delegates. [10] [11]

The ACA was signed into law in March 2010 by President Barack Obama after passing with narrow majorities in the House and Senate on nearly party lines. [12] [13] Softening the eligibility requirements for Medicaid was a central goal of the ACA, [14] forming a two-pronged policy along with subsidized private insurance via health insurance marketplaces to expand health insurance coverage in the U.S. [15] [7] [3] The Medicaid expansion provision of the ACA allowed states to lower the income requirements for Medicaid eligibility, extending eligibility to non-pregnant adults under the age of 65 and not entitled to Medicare with incomes of up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. [lower-alpha 2] [18] [7] Within this cohort were three primary categories of adults: adults without dependent children, parents with dependent children, and adults with disabilities. [6] The ACA sought to eliminate categorical criteria barring these groups from Medicaid eligibility and standardize requirements across states. [19] The expansion provision also stipulated that the federal government would cover an enhanced share of the additional Medicaid expenditure incurred by states as a result of Medicaid expansion. [20] [1] The expansion was to be enacted 2014, with the federal government funding 100 percent of states' costs through 2016 and then gradually declining its share stepwise to 90 percent in 2020 and onwards. [21] [7] The ACA granted federal support to states classified as "expansion states" based on the following requirements: [22] : 273 

...a State is an expansion state if, on the date of the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the State offers health benefits coverage statewide to parents and nonpregnant, childless adults whose income is at least 100 percent of the poverty line, that is not dependent on access to employer coverage, employer contribution, or employment and is not limited to premium assistance, hospital-only benefits, a high deductible health plan, or alternative benefits under a demonstration program authorized under section 1938.

—  111th United States Congress, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that Medicaid expansion under ACA as originally passed would cover 17 million uninsured Americans by 2022. [7] The newly covered adult population in participating states were required to receive health coverage under an Alternative Benefit Plan (ABP) comparable or equivalent to either the state's traditional Medicaid package or a benchmark plan chosen by the state, [23] [24] with mandatory coverage in ten categories of health benefits deemed essential by the ACA. [23] Those deemed medically frail would be given the option of choosing either the ABP or the traditional benefit package. The ABP would also cover screening and diagnostic and treatment services for enrollees younger than 21 years. [23] While Medicaid expansion was to come into force in 2014, the ACA also provided states the option to expand Medicaid early and receive matching funds from the federal government in raising the income cap for Medicaid as prescribed by ACA. States could also receive matching funds by expanding Medicaid early through other mechanisms and obtaining a Section 1115 waiver. [25]

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012)

Although Medicaid expansion under ACA was a de jure voluntary initiative for states, it was intended to be implemented nationally. [26] Opponents of the legislation described the conditioning of the increased funding for Medicaid on states opting into expansion as unconstitutionally coercive, making Medicaid expansion effectively mandatory. [26] [23] The federal government typically covered only 50–83 percent of Medicaid costs prior to ACA, [26] with its share determined by the state's average per capita income. [23] The elevated share for Medicaid expansion implied over $500 billion in additional federal funding between 2014 and 2020. [26] In National Federation of Independent Business, the plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of the ACA and contended that the Medicaid expansion provision was coercive. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida ruled in favor of the federal government on Medicaid expansion, and this ruling was upheld 2–1 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [27] While the Supreme Court largely upheld the constitutionality of the ACA, the court ruled in a 7–2 decision that the Medicaid expansion provision was unconstitutionally coercive. [5] [27] The court established that the federal government could not condition funding for a preexisting program (i.e. Medicaid) on state participation in what the court classified as a new program (i.e. Medicaid expansion). [28] However, the court also ruled 5–4 that Medicaid expansion without the federal threat of defunding Medicaid in non-compliant states fell within the powers afforded by the Spending Clause to Congress. [27] Adoption of Medicaid expansion by individual states was effectively optional as a result of National Federation of Independent Business. [29] States opting out of Medicaid expansion could continue with their preexisting Medicaid requirements without the risk of federal defunding while states accepting the enhanced federal funding would be required to participate in Medicaid expansion. [30] In July 2012, the CBO revised its projection of Americans covered by Medicaid expansion by 2022 to 11 million as a result of the ruling. [7]

When the ACA fully came into effect in January 2014, 24 states and the District of Columbia adopted Medicaid expansion. [lower-alpha 3] [31] Most states implemented Medicaid expansion via expansion of their Medicaid programs while some states did so by other means such as the use of health savings accounts. [6] The incongruous adoption of Medicaid expansion was a result of several factors, including partisanship and pressure from private insurance stakeholders. [32] [19] Primarily Republican resistance to Medicaid expansion prevented adoption of the provision in other states, with opponents characterizing expansion as an overreach of the federal government into a free market space and arguing that expansion would raise healthcare costs and lower coverage quality. [33] The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which passed in March 2021, compelled the federal government to cover an additional 5 percent of state expenditure incurred by Medicaid expansion atop the 90 percent stipulated by ACA to incentivize the then-12 non-expansion states to adopt Medicaid expansion, in addition to Missouri and Oklahoma which had adopted but not implemented expansion at the time. [34] [35] As of March 2023, 40 states and the District of Columbia have adopted Medicaid expansion while 10 have not. [1]

States adopting Medicaid expansion after ACA enactment

Maine

On November 16, 2012, Governor of Maine Paul LePage declared that he would not be implementing Medicaid expansion in Maine; at the time, Medicaid expansion in his state would expand health coverage to 37,000 people. [36] Proponents for expansion in Maine argued that it would bolster rural hospitals and create new jobs; opponents cited previous problems with the state budget following earlier expansions of Medicaid in the state prior to the ACA [37] LePage remained a stalwart objector of Medicaid expansion thereafter, [38] asserting that expansion would divert funds from other state programs and often summarizing his stance as "free is expensive to somebody." [39] He vetoed five Medicaid expansion bills passed by the Maine legislature between 2013 and 2017. [37] [39]

On October 13, 2016, Maine Equal Justice Partners, a progressive advocacy group, announced that it would begin canvassing for signatures to hold a referendum on Medicaid expansion in the state. [40] [41] Maine Equal Justice Partners stated that over 65,000 signatures were collected on Election Day in 2016, enough to place Medicaid expansion on the ballot in a subsequent election. [42] Expansion of Medicaid was introduced to the ballot for the November 2017 election as Question 2. [43] Around $2 million was spent on campaigning in support of the ballot measure compared to less than $300,000 for opposition to the measure. [39] Question 2 passed with 59 percent of the vote, [38] making Maine the first state to approve Medicaid expansion by ballot measure. [37] Support was strongest in southern and coastal Maine. At the time of passage, the expanded eligibility for Medicaid would encompass 70,000 more adults. [37] Passage of the measure compelled the state to enact expansion legislation 30 days after finalization of the election results and submit its expansion plan to the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) within 90 days of legislative enactment. [44]

Despite the successful ballot initiative, LePage indicated that Medicaid expansion would not be implemented until the state legislature was able to fund Maine's share of the expansion without increasing taxes, using the state's rainy day fund, or curtailing services for the elderly and disabled. [38] [44] Sara Gideon, the Speaker of the Maine House of Representatives, responded by stating that "Any attempts to illegally delay or subvert [expansion legislation]" would "be fought with every recourse at our disposal." [44] The Maine legislature failed to overturn LePage's veto of the accompanying legislation in July 2018. [45] Maine Equal Justice Partners sued to force the LePage administration to accept federal funding for Medicaid expansion, [45] resulting in an order from the Kennebec County Superior Court compelling LePage to submit an expansion plan to the HHS. However, LePage continued to defy Medicaid expansion, stating that he would “go to jail" before implementing Medicaid expansion without prior appropriation of state funding; [46] his administration appealed the court order to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, which dismissed the appeal in August 2018. [47] [48] The administration filed the requisite documents for Medicaid expansion to the federal government the following month, but LePage concurrently wrote a letter encouraging CMS to reject expansion in Maine. [49] Maine Equal Justice Partners subsequently filed suit against the administration in the Maine Business and Consumer Court, seeking to rescind portions of Maine's Medicaid expansion application that asked the federal government to deny expansion. [50]

Janet Mills won the 2018 Maine gubernatorial election; Mills had campaigned on Medicaid expansion stated the expansion would be implemented immediately at the start of her governorship following LePage's departure. [51] [52] The outgoing administration continued to stall expansion of Medicaid; following another legal challenge, the Maine Superior Court set February 1, 2019, as the start date for enrollments into expanded Medicaid. [53] [54] Shortly after taking office, Mills signed an executive order on January 3, 2019, directing the expansion of Medicaid and opening enrollments for the program. [55] Medicaid expansion was implemented in Maine on January 10, 2019, with coverage provided to those eligible retroactive to July 2018. [1]

Oklahoma

Results by county for State Question 802 (2020) in Oklahoma For 60-70% 50-60% Against 70-80% 60-70% 50-60% 2020 Oklahoma Question 802.svg
Results by county for State Question 802 (2020) in Oklahoma

Following the Supreme Court's ruling in National Federation of Independent Business in 2012, Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin stated she was skeptical of Medicaid expansion in Oklahoma but would assess the possibility. [56] Fallin later put off the decision until after the 2012 election. [57] [58] Tom Coburn, the junior U.S. senator from Oklahoma, wrote a letter to Fallin in October 2012 warning against expanding the state's Medicaid program. [59] On November 19, 2012, Fallin announced that the state would not be moving forward with Medicaid expansion, citing high costs and the resulting need for budget cuts to other government programs. [60] [61]

In 2016, Fallin and Nico Gomez, the executive director of the Oklahoma Health Care Authority (OHCA), proposed creating a subsidized private option for the Medicaid coverage gap administered through the OHCA's Insure Oklahoma program, mitigating expansion of Medicaid. [62] [63] Termed the "Medicaid Rebalancing Act of 2020", the plan was to be partly federally funded. [64] However, the proposal lost momentum in the Oklahoma Senate following increasing opposition and was tabled without a vote; [65] [66] [63] Gomez, who championed the proposal, resigned in August 2016. [65]

In December 2018, in the wake of the 2018 midterm elections, Democrats in the Oklahoma House of Representatives announced that they would legislatively push for Medicaid expansion. [67] A grassroots effort to put forth a Medicaid expansion ballot initiative began in April 2019 as opposition from Republican legislators and newly elected governor Kevin Stitt made expansion via the legislature unlikely. [63] [68] [69] The conservative think tank Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs challenged the proposal in the Oklahoma Supreme Court, arguing that the language of the associated petition was inaccurate and that the proposed policy was unconstitutional; the court ruled in June 2019 that the petition could continue collecting signatures. [70] Canvassing to qualify the initiative on the ballot began on July 31, 2019. [69] [71] The ballot initiative campaign submitted 313,677 signatures to the Oklahoma Secretary of State in October 2019, exceeding the 178,000 needed to place the measure on the ballot and setting a state record for signatures collected for an initiative petition. [72]

As canvassing for the ballot initiative was ongoing, a bipartisan legislative working group intended to address Medicaid expansion and healthcare coverage began convening and regularly meeting. [69] [73] Both Stitt and the working group sought to devise alternatives to the Medicaid expansion outlined by the initiative. [72] Stitt unveiled his proposal, dubbed SoonerCare 2.0, in March 2020; the plan involved expansion of the state's Medicaid program including work requirements and tiered monthly premiums and copays. [74] His plan was to serve as the state's use of CMS's Healthy Adult Opportunity program with an anticipated rollout in July 2020. [75] [63] [76] The ballot initiative appeared on the ballot for the 2020 primaries as State Question 802, with support from several health organizations and Native American tribes in the state. [77] The measure passed by less than a percentage-point margin, compelling the state to implement Medicaid expansion by July 1, 2021. [78] Stitt withdrew his healthcare proposal following passage of the initiative. [69]

South Dakota

Results by county for Constitutional Amendment D (2022) in South Dakota For 80-90% 70-80% 60-70% 50-60% Against 60-70% 50-60% 2022 South Dakota Amendment D results map by county.svg
Results by county for Constitutional Amendment D (2022) in South Dakota

The Republican-controlled South Dakota Legislature long opposed Medicaid expansion. [79] Proponents of Medicaid expansion in the state emphasized the benefits to healthcare access and rural hospitals, particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 epidemic, while critics argued that expanding Medicaid would be fiscally irresponsible, lead to tax increases, and discourage able-bodied adults from seeking work. [80] [81] In October 2014, telephone poll conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy of 800 registered voters in the state found that respondents supported Medicaid expansion as outlined in ACA by a 45–37 percent margin, with an additional 18 percent of respondents undecided. [82] In 2015, South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard proposed extending Medicaid coverage to 55,000 residents and raising health spending for Native Americans. However, a deal could not be reached between the state and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services before the end of then-President Obama's term. [79]

A coalition of advocacy groups, including Dakotans for Health, began canvassing for signatures in 2021 to place a constitutional amendment to expand Medicaid on the ballot for the 2022 election. [79] [83] [84] The state legislature drafted a resolution that would put to vote a constitutional amendment requiring subsequent ballot measures to garner 60 percent of the vote if the measure created new taxes or required more than $10 million in state appropriations within the first five years of enactment. [84] In March 2021, the South Dakota Senate voted to expedite voting on the measure, moving it from the 2022 general election to the 2022  primaries. [85] The associated amendment was added to the ballot for the 2022 primaries as Constitutional Amendment C. [86] Supporters of Medicaid expansion viewed passage of Amendment C as an attempt to prevent Medicaid expansion from passing via ballot initiative; [87] Dakotans for Health unsuccessfully challenged the resolution in the South Dakota Supreme Court in May 2021. [88] Medicaid expansion was placed on the 2022 general election ballot as Constitutional Amendment D after garnering 38,244 signatures. [89]

Concurrently, Republican State Senator Wayne Steinhauer introduced a proposal to the South Dakota Legislature to expand Medicaid, arguing that the wording of Amendment D was not desirable and proposing withdrawal of the ballot measure if his bill was passed. [90] His Republican colleagues argued that expanding the program would expand the government and pull funding away from public schools. The Republican-led South Dakota Senate voted against the proposal by a 12–13 vote on February 15, 2022. [91] Amendment C later failed by a 67.4–32.6 percentage point margin in the 2022 primary election, ensuring that Amendment D could pass by majority vote. [92] Governor Kristi Noem opposed Medicaid expansion, but stated in a September 2022 debate for the 2022 gubernatorial election that Medicaid expansion would be implemented if passed by ballot initiative, provided that it was "written constitutionally." [80] Amendment D passed by a 12.4-percentage point margin, with 56.2 percent of voters supporting the measure. [80] The passage of Constitutional Amendment D set into motion the expansion of Medicaid to 42,500 new adult and nonelderly South Dakotans by July 1, 2023. [93] People within the Medicaid coverage gap are expected to account for approximately a third of the newly eligible population. [80] The state Department of Social Services estimated that 52,000 people would enroll in the expanded program. [93]

Utah

Medicaid expansion in Utah remained an undecided issue in the state government in the aftermath of NFIB v. Sebelius. [94] [95] The Republican-controlled state legislature was staunchly opposed to Medicaid expansion due to its costs and distrust of the federal government. [94] While Governor Gary Herbert elected to wait for an independent analysis of Medicaid expansion to make a decision, Republican lawmakers sought to pass a bill prohibiting Medicaid expansion without approval from the state legislature; [96] [97] the Utah House of Representatives approved the bill by a 46–27 vote on March 11, 2013. [98]

Medicaid expansion in Utah took effect on January 1, 2020. [99]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ As of 2023, this corresponds to an annual income of $9,447 for parents in a family of three. In Texas, the state with the most stringent requirements, the income limit was $3,977 for parents in a family of three. [2]
  2. ↑ As of 2023, this corresponds to an individual income of $20,120. [1] The statutory income requirement for Medicaid expansion was 133 percent and based on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI). Combining the 133 percent threshold with the statutory 5 percent income disregard under ACA results in a 138 percent effective income threshold. [16] : 1804  [17] : 11 
  3. ↑ Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia adopted Medicaid expansion concurrent with the enactment of the ACA on January 1, 2014. [1]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicaid</span> United States social health care program for families and individuals with limited resources

In the United States, Medicaid is a government program that provides health insurance for adults and children with limited income and resources. The program is partially funded and primarily managed by state governments, which also have wide latitude in determining eligibility and benefits, but the federal government sets baseline standards for state Medicaid programs and provides a significant portion of their funding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Children's Health Insurance Program</span> Health Insurance program for families administered by the United States

The Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) – formerly known as the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) – is a program administered by the United States Department of Health and Human Services that provides matching funds to states for health insurance to families with children. The program was designed to cover uninsured children in families with incomes that are modest but too high to qualify for Medicaid. The program was passed into law as part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, and the statutory authority for CHIP is under title XXI of the Social Security Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massachusetts health care reform</span>

The Massachusetts health care reform, commonly referred to as Romneycare, was a healthcare reform law passed in 2006 and signed into law by Governor Mitt Romney with the aim of providing health insurance to nearly all of the residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Healthcare reform in the United States has a long history. Reforms have often been proposed but have rarely been accomplished. In 2010, landmark reform was passed through two federal statutes: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), signed March 23, 2010, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which amended the PPACA and became law on March 30, 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health insurance coverage in the United States</span> Overview of the coverage of health insurances in the United States

In the United States, health insurance coverage is provided by several public and private sources. During 2019, the U.S. population overall was approximately 330 million, with 59 million people 65 years of age and over covered by the federal Medicare program. The 273 million non-institutionalized persons under age 65 either obtained their coverage from employer-based or non-employer based sources, or were uninsured. During the year 2019, 89% of the non-institutionalized population had health insurance coverage. Separately, approximately 12 million military personnel received coverage through the Veteran's Administration and Military Health System.

In the United States, health insurance marketplaces, also called health exchanges, are organizations in each state through which people can purchase health insurance. People can purchase health insurance that complies with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act at ACA health exchanges, where they can choose from a range of government-regulated and standardized health care plans offered by the insurers participating in the exchange.

Medicaid estate recovery is a required process under United States federal law in which state governments adjust (settle) or recover the cost of care and services from the estates of those who received Medicaid benefits after they die. By law, states may not settle any payments until after the beneficiary's death. States are required to adjust or recover all costs under certain circumstances, all involving long-term care arrangements. Federal law also gives states the option to adjust or recover the costs of all payments to health care providers except Medicare cost-sharing for anyone on Medicaid over the age of 55.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affordable Care Act</span> U.S. federal statute also known as Obamacare

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and colloquially known as Obamacare, is a landmark U.S. federal statute enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 amendment, it represents the U.S. healthcare system's most significant regulatory overhaul and expansion of coverage since the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965.

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld Congress's power to enact most provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly called Obamacare, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), including a requirement for most Americans to pay a penalty for forgoing health insurance by 2014. The Acts represented a major set of changes to the American health care system that had been the subject of highly contentious debate, largely divided on political party lines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oregon Medicaid health experiment</span>

The Oregon health insurance experiment was a research study looking at the effects of the 2008 Medicaid expansion in the U.S. state of Oregon, which occurred based on lottery drawings from a waiting list and thus offered an opportunity to conduct a randomized experiment by comparing a control group of lottery losers to a treatment group of winners, who were eligible to apply for enrollment in the Medicaid expansion program after previously being uninsured.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is divided into 10 titles and contains provisions that became effective immediately, 90 days after enactment, and six months after enactment, as well as provisions phased in through to 2020. Below are some of the key provisions of the ACA. For simplicity, the amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 are integrated into this timeline.

This article summarizes healthcare in California.

The premium tax credit (PTC) is a mechanism established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through which the United States federal government partially subsidizes the cost of private health insurance for certain lower- and middle-income individuals and families. The PTC is a refundable tax credit, and may be applied directly to the cost of insurance premiums.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 Maine Question 2</span>

Maine Question 2, formally entitled "An Act To Enhance Access to Affordable Health Care", was a citizen-initiated ballot measure that appeared on the November 7, 2017 statewide ballot in the State of Maine. Maine Question 2 sought to expand Medicaid eligibility under the terms of the Affordable Care Act. The measure passed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Health Care Act of 2017</span> Proposed U.S. law

The American Health Care Act of 2017 was a bill in the 115th United States Congress. The bill, which was passed by the United States House of Representatives but not by the United States Senate, would have partially repealed the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, often shortened to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or nicknamed Obamacare, is a United States federal statute enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 amendment, it represents the U.S. healthcare system's most significant regulatory overhaul and expansion of coverage since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. Once the law was signed, provisions began taking effect, in a process that continued for years. Some provisions never took effect, while others were deferred for various periods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fairness Project</span> Charitable organization in the U.S.

The Fairness Project is a United States 501(c)(4) charitable organization created in October 2015. They promote general economic and social justice throughout the US by the use of ballot measures to circumvent deadlocks in law changes by the legislative and executive branches of government. They act as a national body by supporting state organizations and campaigns with targeted funding rather than by direct campaigning. They support the gathering of signatures to meet the variable requirements to trigger ballots in states and then aid the campaigns with early financial backing, strategic advice, and various campaign tools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Idaho Proposition 2</span> Approved ballot initiative in Idaho, U.S.

2018 Idaho Proposition 2 is an approved ballot initiative that was included on the 2018 General Election ballot on November 6, 2018. Idaho's Proposition 2 is an initiative which addressed the proposed Medicaid gap within the state. This Ballot Initiative was approved and qualified to be included for voting on July 17, 2018, through campaigning and petitioning for signatures to acquire the necessary support of the voting Idaho population to be included for state-wide voting through the 2018 General Election ballot. This initiative moved to expand Medicaid to persons who did not previously qualify. Proposition 2 would expand Medicaid coverage to persons under the age of 65 if their income is below 133% of the Federal Poverty Line (FPL) and are unable to gain medical insurance or coverage through other means.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Oklahoma State Question 802</span>

Oklahoma Question 802, the Oklahoma Medicaid Expansion Initiative, was a 2020 ballot measure on the June 30 ballot to expand Medicaid in the state of Oklahoma. It passed narrowly, over the objections of many prominent state elected officials, such as Oklahoma's governor Kevin Stitt. Medicaid expansion went into effect on July 1, 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Missouri Amendment 2</span> Ballot initiative to expand Medicaid

2020 Missouri Amendment 2, also known as the Medicaid Expansion Initiative, was a ballot measure to amend the Constitution of Missouri to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The initiative was on the August 4, 2020, primary ballot and passed with 53.27% of the vote. Following previous successful Medicaid expansion initiatives in other states, Republican lawmakers in Nebraska and Utah added work requirements to their states' Medicaid expansions, which supporters aimed to prevent by proposing state constitutional amendments for future Medicaid expansion initiatives. Opponents sued to prevent the initiative from being voted on, but courts ruled in the measure's favor. The measure was supported most in urban areas and opposed in rural areas. After a delay due to a lack of funding from the Missouri General Assembly and resulting litigation, the initiative was implemented in October 2021, albeit slowly. Republican lawmakers attempted to roll back the program and add a work requirement through a state constitutional amendment, which failed after the United States Supreme Court effectively prevented the implementation of one.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions: Interactive Map". KFF. Map is updated as changes occur. Click on states for details.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Rudowitz, Robin; Drake, Patrick; Tolbert, Jennifer; Damico, Anthony (March 31, 2023). "How Many Uninsured Are in the Coverage Gap and How Many Could be Eligible if All States Adopted the Medicaid Expansion?". Medicaid. KFF. Archived from the original on May 25, 2023. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  3. 1 2 Gunn, Dwyer (June 14, 2017) [January 26, 2016]. "The Medicaid Coverage Gap Persists". Pacific Standard. Grist. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  4. ↑ "The Medicaid Coverage Gap: State Fact Sheets". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved May 24, 2023.
  5. 1 2 3 Rosenbaum, Sara; Westmoreland, Timothy M. (August 2012). "The Supreme Court's Surprising Decision On The Medicaid Expansion: How Will The Federal Government And States Proceed?". Health Affairs. 31 (8): 1663–1672. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0766. PMID   22869643. S2CID   10008906.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Mitchell, Alison (December 30, 2014). "Medicaid: The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP)" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Retrieved May 24, 2023– via Federation of American Scientists.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Musumeci, MaryBeth (August 2012). A Guide to the Supreme Court's Decision on the ACA's Medicaid Expansion (PDF) (Report). KFF. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  8. ↑ Pear, Robert (January 4, 2008). "U.S. Curtailing Bids to Expand Medicaid Rolls". New York Times. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  9. ↑ Lake, Celinda C.; Crittenden, Robert A.; Mermin, David (May 2008). "Health Care In The 2008 Election: Engaging The Voters". Health Affairs. 27 (3): 693–698. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.693 . PMID   18474959.
  10. ↑ Blendon, Robert J.; Altman, Drew E.; Benson, John M.; Brodie, Mollyann; Buhr, Tami; Deane, Claudia; Buscho, Sasha (November 6, 2008). "Voters and Health Reform in the 2008 Presidential Election". New England Journal of Medicine. 359 (19): 2050–2061. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr0807717 . PMID   18974307.
  11. ↑ Calmes, Jackie; Thee, Megan (August 31, 2008). "G.O.P. Rallies in Support of McCain, Poll Shows". New York Times. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  12. ↑ Haselswerdt, Jake (August 2017). "Expanding Medicaid, Expanding the Electorate: The Affordable Care Act's Short-Term Impact on Political Participation". Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 42 (4): 667–695. doi:10.1215/03616878-3856107. PMID   28483811.
  13. ↑ Jacobs, Lawrence R.; Callaghan, Timothy (October 2013). "Why States Expand Medicaid: Party, Resources, and History". Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 38 (5): 1023–1050. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2334889 . PMID   23794741.
  14. ↑ Mazurenko, Olena; Balio, Casey P.; Agarwal, Rajender; Carroll, Aaron E.; Menachemi, Nir (June 2018). "The Effects Of Medicaid Expansion Under The ACA: A Systematic Review". Health Affairs. 37 (6): 944–950. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1491. PMID   29863941. S2CID   46937241.
  15. ↑ Levitt, Larry (October 14, 2021). "The Inequity of the Medicaid Coverage Gap and Why It Is Hard to Fix It". JAMA Health Forum. 2 (10): e213905. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3905 . PMID   36218895. S2CID   244618197.
  16. ↑ Wen, Hefei; Druss, Benjamin G.; Cummings, Janet R. (December 2015). "Effect of Medicaid Expansions on Health Insurance Coverage and Access to Care among Low-Income Adults with Behavioral Health Conditions". Health Services Research. 50 (6): 1787–1809. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12411. PMC   4693853 . PMID   26551430.
  17. ↑ Gee, Emily R. (February 11, 2014). Eligible Uninsured Latinos: 8 in 10 Could Receive Health Insurance Marketplace Tax Credits, Medicaid or CHIP (PDF) (Report). Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved May 24, 2023.
  18. ↑ "Medicaid expansion". Glossary. Healthinsurance.org. January 23, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2023.
  19. 1 2 Olson, Laura Katz (July 3, 2015). "The Affordable Care Act and the Politics of the Medicaid Expansion". New Political Science. 37 (3): 295–320. doi:10.1080/07393148.2015.1056428. S2CID   153652077.
  20. ↑ Petersen, Chris L. (April 7, 2010). "Medicaid: The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP)" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Retrieved May 24, 2023– via EveryCRSReport.
  21. ↑ Lyon, Sarah M.; Douglas, Ivor S.; Cooke, Colin R. (May 2014). "Medicaid Expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Implications for Insurance-related Disparities in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep". Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 11 (4): 661–667. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201402-072PS. PMC   4225799 . PMID   24708065.
  22. ↑ "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act". Act No. 111–143 of March 23, 2010 (PDF). 111th United States Congress. pp. 119–1024.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 Crowley, Ryan A.; Golden, William (March 18, 2014). "Health policy basics: Medicaid expansion". Annals of Internal Medicine. 160 (6): 423–5. doi:10.7326/M13-2626. PMID   24366475. S2CID   37194152.
  24. ↑ Andrews, Christina M.; Grogan, Colleen M.; Smith, Bikki Tran; Abraham, Amanda J.; Pollack, Harold A.; Humphreys, Keith; Westlake, Melissa A.; Friedmann, Peter D. (August 2018). "Medicaid Benefits For Addiction Treatment Expanded After Implementation Of The Affordable Care Act". Health Affairs. 37 (8): 1216–1222. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0272. PMC   6501794 . PMID   30080460.
  25. ↑ "States Getting a Jump Start on Health Reform's Medicaid Expansion". KFF. April 2, 2012. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Pear, Robert (March 24, 2012). "Implications Are Far-Reaching in States' Challenge of Federal Health Care Law". New York Times. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  27. 1 2 3 "National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius". Oyez. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  28. ↑ Rosenbaum, Sara; Wilensky, Gail (March 2020). "Closing The Medicaid Coverage Gap: Options For Reform: A review of options that could make health insurance more affordable for 2.5 million poor working age adults who live in states that have not expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act". Health Affairs. 39 (3): 514–518. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01463. PMID   32119611. S2CID   211835394.
  29. ↑ Garfield, Rachel; Damico, Anthony (October 2017). The Coverage Gap: Uninsured Poor Adults in States that Do Not Expand Medicaid (PDF) (Report). KFF. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  30. ↑ Russell, Kevin (June 28, 2012). "Court holds that states have choice whether to join medicaid expansion". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  31. ↑ Escarce, José J.; Wozniak, Gregory D.; Tsipas, Stavros; Pane, Joseph D.; Ma, Yanlei; Brotherton, Sarah E.; Yu, Hao (May 2022). "The Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion, Social Disadvantage, and the Practice Location Choices of New General Internists". Medical Care. 60 (5): 342–350. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001703. PMC   8989636 . PMID   35250020.
  32. ↑ Lanford, Daniel; Quadagno, Jill (September 2016). "Implementing ObamaCare: The Politics of Medicaid Expansion under the Affordable Care Act of 2010". Sociological Perspectives. 59 (3): 619–639. doi:10.1177/0731121415587605. S2CID   148121624.
  33. ↑ Neukam, Stephen (March 23, 2023). "These 10 states have not expanded Medicaid". The Hill. Nexstar Media. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  34. ↑ Musumeci, MaryBeth (March 18, 2021). "Medicaid Provisions in the American Rescue Plan Act". KFF. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  35. ↑ Rosenbaum, Sara; Handley, Morgan; Casoni, Maria; Morris, Rebecca (March 23, 2021). "Medicaid And The American Rescue Plan: How It All Fits Together". Health Affairs Blog. HealthAffairs. doi:10.1377/forefront.20210322.860778 . Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  36. ↑ Mistler, Steve (November 17, 2012). "LePage defies key parts of Obamacare". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine. pp. A1, A7 . Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  37. 1 2 3 4 Murphy, Edward D.; Lawlor, Joe (November 8, 2017) [November 7, 2017]. "Maine becomes first state to approve Medicaid expansion by popular vote". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  38. 1 2 3 Wight, Patty (November 8, 2017). "After Maine Voters Approve Medicaid Expansion, Governor Raises Objections". NPR. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  39. 1 2 3 Whittle, Patrick (November 7, 2017). "Maine OKs Medicaid expansion in first-of-its-kind referendum". Boston.com. Boston Globe Media Partners. Associated Press. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  40. ↑ Lawlor, Joe (October 13, 2016). "Group prepared to seek referendum in fight to expand Medicaid". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine. pp. A1, A5 . Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  41. ↑ Lawlor, Joe (October 14, 2016). "Group will seek signers for Medicaid petitions". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine. p. B1, B5 . Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  42. ↑ Murphy, Edward D. (December 15, 2016). "Enough signatures gathered to put Medicaid expansion on Maine ballot". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  43. ↑ Miller, Kevin (September 8, 2017). "Medicaid, casino ballot wording changes". Morning Sentinel. Waterville, Maine. pp. B1, B2 . Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  44. 1 2 3 Santhanam, Laura (November 9, 2017). "Why Maine voted to expand Medicaid — and what's next". PBS. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  45. 1 2 Villenuve, Marina (July 9, 2018). "LePage wins latest swipe against Medicaid expansion". Associated Press. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  46. ↑ Miller, Kevin (July 13, 2018) [July 12, 2018]. "LePage says he'll go to jail before he lets Maine expand Medicaid without funding". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  47. ↑ Goodnough, Abby (July 24, 2018). "A Vote Expanded Medicaid in Maine. The Governor Is Ignoring It". New York Times. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  48. ↑ Gray, Megan (August 23, 2018). "Maine high court rejects LePage request to delay Medicaid expansion". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine.
  49. ↑ Lawlor, Joe (September 4, 2018). "LePage files court-ordered plan to expand Medicaid in Maine – and asks feds to reject it". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  50. ↑ Lawlor, Joe (September 22, 2018). "Another legal move underway to block LePage's medicaid efforts". Sun Journal. Lewiston, Maine. p. A2. Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  51. ↑ Miller, Kevin (November 8, 2018). "Mills talks priorities". Sun Journal. Lewiston, Maine. p. A5. Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  52. ↑ Lawlor, Joe (November 8, 2018). "Mills to start Medicaid expansion". Sun Journal. Lewiston, Maine. p. A5. Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  53. ↑ Lawlor, Joe (November 28, 2018). "LePage seeks another delay to Medicaid". Kennebec Journal. Kennebec, Maine. p. B7. Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  54. ↑ Lawlor, Joe (December 7, 2018). "Maine can wait to expand after LePage leaves". Sun Journal. Lewiston, Maine. Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  55. ↑ Lawlor, Joe (January 4, 2019). "Mills Signs Order to Expand Medicaid". Portland Press Herald. Portland, Maine. pp. A1, A7 . Retrieved June 6, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  56. ↑ Cooper, Michael (July 14, 2012). "Many Governors Are Still Unsure About Medicaid Expansion". New York Times. Retrieved May 27, 2023.
  57. ↑ Greene, Wayne (July 25, 2012). "Fallin says Medicaid decision is unlikely before fall election". The Oklahoman. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. p. 16A. Retrieved May 26, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  58. ↑ Green, Wayne (August 8, 2012). "Health exchange likely dead in state". The Oklahoma. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. p. 8A. Retrieved May 27, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  59. ↑ Casteel, Chris (October 23, 2012). "Coburn warns against Medicaid expansion". The Oklahoman. p. 7A. Retrieved May 27, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  60. ↑ Rolland, Megan (November 20, 2012). "Governor says state won't develop health care exchange". The Oklahoman. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. pp. 1A, 4A . Retrieved May 27, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  61. ↑ Cosgrove, Jaclyn (November 20, 2012). "Medicaid decision draws mixed reaction". The Oklahoman. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. pp. 1A, 4A . Retrieved May 27, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  62. ↑ Hoberock, Barbara (April 1, 2016). "Shoring up health system". Tulsa World. Tulsa, Oklahoma. pp. A1, A6 . Retrieved May 26, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  63. 1 2 3 4 Brown, Trevor (January 16, 2022) [June 28, 2021]. "The Long, Winding Road to Medicaid Expansion in Oklahoma". Oklahoma Watch . Retrieved May 27, 2023.
  64. ↑ Krehbiel, Randy; Hoberock, Barbara (April 24, 2016). "Medicaid 'rebalancing' draws questions". The Oklahoman. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. p. 5A. Retrieved May 27, 2023.
  65. 1 2 Cosgrove, Jaclyn; Green, Rick (August 30, 2016). "State Medicaid director announces resignation". Tulsa World. Tulsa, Oklahoma. p. A11. Retrieved May 27, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  66. ↑ Murphy, Sean (May 30, 2016). "Oklahoma Legislature closes $1.3B budget gap". Tulsa World. Tulsa, Oklahoma. pp. A1, A6 . Retrieved May 27, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  67. ↑ Felder, Ben (December 16, 2018). "Dems will push Medicaid expansion". The Oklahoman. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. pp. A1, A2 . Retrieved May 30, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  68. ↑ Rowley, D. Sean (May 17, 2019). "Stitt not supportive of Medicaid expansion in Oklahoma". Cherokee Phoenix. Tahlequah, Oklahoma. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  69. 1 2 3 4 Putnam, Carly (September 21, 2022) [July 19, 2019]. "SQ 802: Medicaid Expansion – Information and resources". OKPolicy.org. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Oklahoma Policy Institute. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  70. ↑ Halter, Caroline (June 18, 2019). "Oklahoma Supreme Court Says Medicaid Expansion Campaign Can Proceed". KGOU. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
  71. ↑ "Medicaid expansion supporters organizing Oklahoma volunteers". Associated Press. July 24, 2019. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  72. 1 2 Forman, Carmen (October 25, 2019). "Medicaid expansion campaign turns in 313,000 signatures, breaks record". The Oklahoman. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  73. ↑ Brown, Trevor (August 30, 2019). "Key facts about Medicaid Expansion proposal". Sequoyah County Times. Vol. 125, no. 24. Sallisaw, Oklahoma. pp. A1, A3 . Retrieved May 30, 2019– via Newspapers.com.
  74. ↑ Trotter, Matt (March 18, 2020). "Stitt's SoonerCare 2.0 Plan Released for Public Comment". Public Radio Tulsa. Tulsa, Oklahoma. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  75. ↑ Forman, Carmen (January 31, 2020). "Gov. Kevin Stitt looks to implement Trump-supported Medicaid expansion in Oklahoma". The Oklahoman. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  76. ↑ Brown, Trevor (August 17, 2020) [February 14, 2020]. "Exclusive: Stitt's Plan Would Implement Full Medicaid Expansion as Early as July". Oklahoma Watch . Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  77. ↑ Forman, Carmen (June 28, 2020). "Medicaid expansion on ballot". The Oklahoman. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. pp. A1–A2 . Retrieved May 30, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  78. ↑ Fortier, Jackie (July 1, 2020). "Oklahoma Votes For Medicaid Expansion Over Objections Of Republican State Leaders". NPR. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  79. 1 2 3 Bush, Daniel (March 16, 2021). "Support for Medicaid expansion grows in South Dakota, one of the last red state holdouts". PBS. NewsHour Productions. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  80. 1 2 3 4 Santhanam, Laura (November 15, 2022). "South Dakota passed Medicaid expansion. What's next?". PBS. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  81. ↑ Messerly, Megan (November 9, 2022). "South Dakota votes to expand Medicaid". Politico. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  82. ↑ Walker, Jon (October 26, 2014) [October 25, 2014]. "Poll: More S.D. voters back Medicaid expansion". Argus Leader. Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  83. ↑ Raman, Sandhya (May 25, 2021). "Medicaid expansion fight resurfaces in states". Roll CAll. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  84. 1 2 Crampton, Liz (July 21, 2021). "The next Republican target: Ballot campaigns". Politico. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  85. ↑ Groves, Stephen (March 2, 2021). "Senate wants 60% voter threshold for some ballot initiatives". Associated Press. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  86. ↑ Sneve, Joe (June 21, 2021). "Top South Dakota lawmakers organize to support three-fifths rule on financial ballot initiatives". Argus Leader. Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  87. ↑ Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (November 3, 2022). "Voters Have Expanded Medicaid in 6 States. Is South Dakota Next?". New York Times. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  88. ↑ Ellis, Jonathan; Sneve, Joe (May 6, 2021). "Medicaid expansion group loses SD Supreme Court bid". Argus Leader. Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  89. ↑ Zionts, Arielle (January 3, 2022). "South Dakota Medicaid expansion will be on November 2022 ballot". South Dakota Public Broadcasting. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  90. ↑ Sneve, Joe (January 6, 2022). "Senator seeks to withdraw ballot measure in exchange for Legislative action on Medicaid expansion". Argus Leader. Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  91. ↑ "SD Senate rejects Medicaid expansion, leaving it to election". AssociatedPress. February 15, 2022. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  92. ↑ Ellis, Jonathan (June 7, 2022). "Voters not interested in making it harder to raise taxes, reject Amendment C". Argus Leader. Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  93. 1 2 Huber, Makenzie (November 9, 2022). "State prepares to implement Medicaid expansion next summer, expects 'significant' hiring". South Dakota Searchlight. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  94. 1 2 Dobner, Jennifer (May 23, 2013). "Analysis: Medicaid expansion would save Utah millions, cover 123K uninsured". The Salt Lake Tribune. Salt Lake City, Utah. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  95. ↑ Dobner, Jennifer (June 8, 2013). "Utah mom: 'I would have died' without PCN, state's low-income health coverage". The Salt Lake Tribune. Salt Lake City, Utah. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  96. ↑ McCombs, Brady (March 2, 2013). "Herbert still mulling over a Medicaid expansion". The Spectrum. Saint George, Utah. p. A2. Retrieved June 22, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  97. ↑ Price, Michelle L. (March 11, 2013). "Utah lawmakers counter Medicaid expansion". The Spectrum. Saint George, Utah. Associated Press. pp. A1, A3 . Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  98. ↑ "Utah House votes to bar Medicaid expansion". The Daily Spectrum. Saint George, Utah. Associated Press. March 13, 2013. p. A2. Retrieved June 22, 2023– via Newspapers.com.
  99. ↑ Wood, Benjamin (January 1, 2020). "Full Medicaid expansion begins in Utah. Here's how to check if you qualify". The Salt Lake Tribune. Salt Lake City, Utah. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.