Michael Welner

Last updated
Michael Welner
Born (1964-09-24) September 24, 1964 (age 58)
Education M.D., University of Miami School of Medicine; B.S., University of Miami
Years active1988 – present
SpouseOrli Welner
Medical career
Profession Psychiatrist
Sub-specialties Forensic psychiatry
ResearchThe Depravity Standard, Forensic Peer Review, CIEEO
Awards American Psychiatric Association Award of Excellence (1997)
Website www.forensicpanel.com

Michael Mark Welner (born September 24, 1964) is an American forensic psychiatrist [1] and Chairman of The Forensic Panel. [2] [3] Welner is best known for his work in sensitive and complex litigation. [4] [5] [6] He has acted as lead forensic psychiatric examiner in numerous criminal or court proceedings of national and international prominence, including precedent-setting trials and higher court decisions. [7] [8] [9] [10] Welner is also known for a number of innovations in forensic science, forensic psychiatry and justice, including protocols for prospective peer review in forensic medicine consultation, [11] [12] research to standardize an evidence-based distinction of the worst crimes, [13] [14] The Depravity Standard, [15] and recommendations for upgrading forensic science assessment. [16] [17] He has been featured in network television news coverage of forensic psychiatry issues, [18] [19] [20] [21] has authored publications for professional and public audiences, and has contributed to emerging legislation on mental health reform. [22]

Contents

Notable cases

Welner is best known for his role and impact in a range of legal cases within the criminal and civil courts. Those of particular prominence or legal significance include:

State of New York vs. Pedro Hernandez – Etan Patz disappearance and murder

Nearly 40 years after Etan Patz disappeared, Pedro Hernandez was arrested in connection with his kidnapping and murder. Prior to Hernandez' arrest and a relative's revelations about his confessions, many authorities believed that Jose Ramos, convicted of other sex crimes, was responsible for Etan Patz' disappearance.

Prosecutors first involved Welner at the early stages after the arrest, before filing charges, [23] to consider defense claims from several psychologists that Hernandez was mentally ill and intellectually disabled and falsely confessed. The defense presented multiple expert opinions in support of their claims that Hernandez was and that his confessions were unreliable. Welner interviewed Hernandez for sixteen hours, [24] interviewed police, studied confessions he had made many years earlier to a prayer group and to a fiancée, as well as to an acquaintance, and the more recent confessions he made to police interrogators in 2012, medical staff, as well as Welner himself. Welner concluded that Hernandez confessed because he felt intense guilt and that the spontaneous, voluntary confessions Hernandez made decades earlier to a prayer group and his fiancée couldn't be attributed to a psychiatric condition. [25]

The case proceeded to trial in 2015. Eleven jurors voted guilty, with one holdout juror remaining after nearly three weeks of deliberation. Welner testified for prosecutors at the original trial and then at the retrial, in which a jury unanimously rendered a guilty verdict to Hernandez in early 2017. Among other points, Welner told jurors it was possible Hernandez tried to minimize the damage he'd done even though he confessed. "It is not remarkable at all for a person to recall a sequence of events and to portray it in a way that is as unremarkable as possible, scrubbing away details … (creating a) much more detached relationship between that person and a victim." [26]

U.S. vs. Brian David Mitchell – Elizabeth Smart kidnappers – Sect Psychology and Brainwashing

Brian David Mitchell, a self-proclaimed prophet, was charged along with his wife in connection with the 2002 kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart. In a case involving the complexities of determining religious zeal from psychosis, Mitchell had been found not competent to stand trial in 2005. Mitchell then began a consistent pattern of singing hymns in court and silence to forensic examiners. [27]

Subsequent evaluations in a state hospital, with which Mitchell did not cooperate, deemed Mitchell to be unchanged – and therefore incompetent. Three years passed, and the case was contemplated for dismissal in state court [28] when federal prosecutors asked Welner to study the matter to a definitive end. [27] He filed a 206-page report detailing extensive new information uncovered in his evaluation, [29] and testified to his conclusions that Mitchell was competent. At a 2010 hearing, Justice Dale Kimball ruled Mitchell was competent to proceed. [30] [31]

The case proceeded to trial, where Welner testified that Mitchell was a pedophile, a sadist, personality disordered, and not legally insane. [27] His testimony drew particular attention to cognitive distortions as they differ from delusions, [29] [32] and culture-specific beliefs of fundamentalist LDS adherents. Mitchell was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. [33] The defense waived its right to appeal. [34]

Welner was also the principal mental health consultant to prosecutors of the sect leader Keith Raniere. His work on the grooming of victims has been cited in victimology references and in sentencing of formerly molested offenders such as Daniel Kovarbisch.

State vs. Byran Uyesugi - Mass murder

Byran Uyesugi, a forty-year-old Xerox service technician, killed seven of his co-workers on November 2, 1999, in the worst mass murder case in the history of Hawaii. Uyesugi began working for Xerox in 1984. He began making unfounded accusations of harassment and product tampering against fellow repairmen, who had great difficulty placating his anger. Coworkers told Welner, who interviewed family, friends, neighbors, co-workers, and Uyesugi prior to trial, that as early as 1995, Uyesugi was openly speaking of carrying out a mass shooting at the workplace were he ever to be fired. [35]

In the period leading up to the shooting, Xerox management increasingly committed to phasing out the copier that Uyesugi had been servicing. He resisted learning the new machine, fearing that he could not keep up with its technical demands. After working around his refusal to train on the new machine, Uyesugi's manager insisted on November 1, 1999, that he would begin training the next day. [36] Instead, Uyesugi came to work the next day and shot his colleagues dead, narrowly missing an eighth victim, after calmly waiting by the water fountain, with "butterflies in his stomach," he later told Welner, as he contemplated the shooting before going through with it. [37]

Uyesugi pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity and claimed that he feared his colleagues were conspiring to have him fired. Welner testified for the prosecution that although Mr. Uyesugi was in his opinion a schizophrenic, "He knew what he was doing was wrong, and he simply did not care. [37] The jury found him sane and guilty of seven murders and one attempted murder after only 75 minutes of deliberation. [38] He received a sentence of life without chance of parole. In 2002, the State of Hawaii Supreme Court upheld Uyesugi's conviction.

Welner has consulted to courts or examined perpetrators on numerous mass shooting and attempted mass shooting cases, including Colorado's James Holmes, [39] NBC gunman William Tager, [40] corrections officer George Banks, who killed 13, [41] Tavares Calloway, [42] and bias-hatred mass shooters Richard Baumhammers, [43] Ronald Taylor, [44] and Ronald Crumpley. [45]

State of Alabama vs. Harvey Updyke – Sports and culture

Harvey Updyke, a fanatic of Alabama Crimson Tide football, was charged with poisoning the iconic trees at Auburn University's Toomer's Corner in 2011. [46] Updyke's actions, which inspired an ESPN 30 for 30 documentary film, became a symbol of the intensity of the Alabama-Auburn football rivalry. [47] At the same time, Updyke continued to exhibit bizarre behavior after his original arrest. [48]

The case reflected on the forensic psychiatric significance of fans' response to emotional defeats, as evidenced by the Auburn defeat of Alabama in November 2010, [49] and the social culture of spectator sports message boards. [50] Prosecutors consulted Welner to review the Updyke history and appraise the boundaries of sports fanaticism vs. mental illness, assess his mental state and criminal responsibility. [51] Updyke pleaded guilty prior to trial. [52]

Welner also engaged mental health issues unique to the culture of professional sports as the forensic psychiatry examiner in the manslaughter trial of former NBA star Jayson Williams, [53] and the death investigation of wrestling champion Chris Benoit. [54]

State of Texas vs. Andrea Yates - Insanity and child killing

Andrea Yates was prosecuted by the State of Texas for the murder of her five children. She claimed legal insanity as a defense at trial for the murder of three of her children. In 2002, Yates was convicted of murder, and sentenced her to life imprisonment. In 2005, the conviction was overturned because the prosecution witness, Park Dietz, falsely testified that Yates' behavior and defense was identical to an earlier episode of Law & Order. There was no such episode. [55] In anticipation of the 2006 retrial for the drowning of her five children, prosecutors asked Welner to assess her diagnosis and Yates' appreciation of the wrong of killing her children at the time of the crime, the criteria for legal insanity. In the videotaped interview with Welner, Yates admitted that she had actually determined to kill the children two months earlier and at a time of relative stability, and was waiting for her first occasion to be alone with them. She knew she would otherwise be stopped. Welner diagnosed Yates with psychotic depression, but concluded that she elected to kill her children because she was overwhelmed, timed with the departure of her mother-in-law that left her as sole caregiver of her five children. Welner also discovered that Andrea Yates locked up the family dog, which was usually free to run around in the house, before drowning the children. Welner included this as one of 68 examples of Yates' appreciation of the wrong of killing her children at the time it happened. [56]

With Welner's examination still ongoing, prosecutors called Deitz at the second trial to testify once again that Yates appreciated that her actions were wrong; Dietz also testified that Yates was not grossly psychotic. [57] Welner later testified that while Yates was psychotic, she appreciated the wrong of her actions. The presiding judge neither allowed the jury access to Welner's 124-page report, nor allowed him to testify to the contents of his interviews of 23 witnesses, including Ms. Yates' husband. Prosecutors did not show Welner's 14-hour interview to the jury, nor introduce psychological testing evidence showing her lack of remorse. [58] The jury, which had been culled from a group that was already familiar with heavy news reporting in the earlier trial [59] and without individual voir dire for their feelings about the case, found Yates not guilty by reason of insanity.

In the aftermath, Yates jurors who later acknowledged personal experiences with mental illness championed the verdict as a landmark. Foreman Todd Frank offered the verdict also conveyed a message to society. "Don't let this happen again. Do what you've got to do with the legislation, with insurance companies," Frank said." [60] Welner has in turn cautioned that overwhelmed, ill or drug addicted mothers who previously contemplate the killing their children as unthinkable would look to Andrea Yates' being sent to a hospital and consider child homicide as an option, [61] adding of filicide, "nobody speaks for the children." [62]

Welner has been the principal examiner in a number of other notable insanity defense cases [63] [64] and others involving child killing within the family, including John Alan Rubio. [65]

State of Louisiana vs. Damon Thibodeaux - Disputed confessions

Damon Thibodeaux confessed in 1996 to raping and murdering a cousin, Crystal Champagne. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. [66] Although appeals upheld the verdict, defense attorneys raised numerous points to the Jefferson Parish District Attorney to argue that Thibodeaux was innocent. No DNA evidence was dispositive and no other perpetrator had been identified beyond speculation. Given the importance of Thibodeaux' confession to the evidence against Thibodeaux, District Attorney Paul Connick asked Welner to review the available evidence, the circumstances of the interrogation and the setting in which it occurred, as well as Thibodeaux' vulnerabilities, to inform their decision-making about the case. Welner also conducted a videotaped interview of Thibodeaux, in a case that featured considerable cooperation by prosecution and defense with his protocol. [67] Welner concluded the confession was false because physical findings grossly contradicted Thibodeaux' statements. He issued a 53-page opinion addressing the causes and factors leading to the false confession. These included the defendant's profound guilt over the fate of his cousin, being confronted with his failed polygraph, and police convincing him that what Thibodeaux himself conceded were false statements in the interrogation clinched his guilt and made continuing denials hopeless. [67] Informed of Welner's conclusions, the District Attorney moved to vacate the confession and Thibodeaux was released. [66] The murder of Crystal Champagne remains under investigation.

Welner has examined numerous other notable and cited disputed confession cases in North American courts, [68] [69] including the killer of New York Socialite Linda Stein [70] and the Albuquerque murder investigation of Victoria Martens. [71]

State of Kansas vs. Cheever - Death penalty

Scott Cheever was arrested for the shooting death of Sheriff Matthew Samuels at a rural methamphetamine lab. When defense attorneys raised the prospect of a psychiatric defense, federal prosecutors retained Welner to examine criminal responsibility claims, ranging from psychiatric diagnoses to the effects of methamphetamine. Welner's review of the case included a videotaped interview of the defendant, [72] in which they discussed the events of the crime, his movements before and during the shooting of Samuels, and what was influencing his decisions.

Defense attorneys at trial instead offered a defense of methamphetamine intoxication. Welner, whose own inquiry had studied what Cheever took, when he took it, and amphetamine's effects on his behavior, and testified in rebuttal that Cheever was making decisions and controlling his actions from moment to moment before the crime, despite having used methamphetamine a short time earlier. Cheever was convicted and eventually sentenced to death. [73]

The Kansas Supreme Court reversed the verdict, and ruled that the trial court erred in permitting prosecutors to call Welner as a witness because an intoxication defense was not a mental health defense. In the court's opinion, the error required a new trial because Welner's testimony included a detailed accounting of Cheever's actions in his own words, and was, "extensive and devastating." [73] In a rare outcome, The United States Supreme Court then unanimously reversed the Kansas Supreme Court, ruling that an intoxication defense, when raised by a defendant, waived a Fifth Amendment protection, that prosecutors had a right to call Welner in rebuttal, and reinstated the verdict and death sentence. [72]

In addition to Cheever, Welner has examined defendants and/or testified in numerous other notable or court cited death penalty cases, [74] including Alfonso Rodriguez [75] and the Angola 5, [76] and cases involving methamphetamine [77] and other drugs and medicines that affect behavior. [78] [63]

U.S. vs. Omar Khadr - Terrorism and War

Khadr, a fifteen-year-old Canadian expatriate living in Afghanistan, was charged with the killing of U.S. Army medic Christopher Speer at an al-Qaeda safe house in Khost. Khadr was captured by American forces on July 27, 2002, and held first in Bagram, Afghanistan and then at Guantanamo Bay detention camp. He was prosecuted through a U.S. military tribunal. [79]

The Department of Defense engaged Welner to examine claims by Khadr that his confessions were coerced, or alternatively, that he was too immature to withstand interrogation. Welner was also asked to assess issues of criminal responsibility. Welner reviewed the available interrogations and secured access to intelligence sources and Khadr's classified file. He interviewed guards, interrogators, medical personnel, Guantanamo camp commanders, intelligence data analysts, and then, Khadr himself. [80] Welner concluded Khadr's confessions were the product of his being confronted with later-recovered video of his assembling bombs, and video of his asserting that he wanted to kill many Americans. Welner's inquiry also led him to repudiate defense claims that Khadr had been tortured. [79] He came to the impression of Khadr as worldly beyond his years, from the range of his travel and interactions to experiences with other languages and translating al-Qaeda meetings for his father, to evasion techniques he manifested in interrogations with senior intelligence personnel. [81] After a lengthy proceeding, Judge Patrick Parrish admitted Omar Khadr's confessions into evidence, ruling, "there isn't credible evidence the accused was ever tortured…even using a liberal interpretation considering the accused's age." [82]

Military prosecutors also asked Welner to assess Khadr's likelihood of recidivism into radical jihadism upon release, for presentation at a sentencing hearing. Welner based his assessment on clinical data, research on deradicalization programs, research on incarcerated Muslim youth, and statistics of recidivism of Guantanamo detainees. [83] At the sentencing proceeding, Welner testified that Mr. Khadr was a high risk of recidivism into dangerous jihadist activities, although he did not expect him to be directly violent. [83] Factors contributing to Welner's opinion included Khadr's continued strong enmeshment with his jihadist family and its legacy, the international and financial infrastructure available to him, his stature among other detainees, among other factors. [80] Referencing Mr. Khadr's evolution at Guantanamo, Welner's testimony noted that then 24-year-old Khadr had been "marinating in jihad," and how the deputy camp commander characterized him as a "rock star" to other inmates who engaged him to lead them. [83] The jury sentenced Khadr to 40 years in prison, though preempted by a pre-existing plea bargain, he was to serve no more than eight additional years at either Guantanamo Bay or in a Canadian prison. A defense appeal directed at Welner's testimony was summarily dismissed. [84]

In March 2011, Canadian Public Safety Minister Vic Toews wrote to U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, asserting that Canada would need to review the sealed tape of Welner's interview in order to consider repatriating Khadr. [85] After reviewing the interviews, Canada repatriated Khadr on September 29, 2012, under heavy pressure from the United States government. However, Canada echoed Welner's previously stated concerns about the nature of Khadr's dangerousness and placed him in a maximum security facility. [86] In October 2013, Khadr's prison transfer application, considered independently of Welner's involvement, was denied. [87] Over the objections of the Canadian government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, a judge released Khadr to the community in 2015. [88]

The Forensic Panel

Welner is the founder and chairman of The Forensic Panel, a multi-specialty forensic practice which employs peer-review of its forensic consultation. The objective of peer review, pursuant to the protocols established by The Forensic Panel, is intended to minimize examiner bias by subjecting forensic assessment to the formal evaluation and scrutiny of peers, who critique the diligence, objectivity, and adherence to standards of the work. [89] The Forensic Panel is composed of over thirty practitioner members who provide forensic consultation in psychiatry, psychology, neuroradiology, emergency and critical care medicine, nursing, toxicology, and pathology.

Research

Welner has pioneered research to operationalize an evidence-based approach for courts and juries charged with defining "heinous", "depraved", and "evil" crimes in sentencing determinations. [90] The Depravity Standard contains twenty-five components of intent, actions, victimology, and attitudes associated with criminal offenses. [91] The goal of the research is to promote an emphasis on gathering evidence as opposed to relying on impressionistic arguments, and to establish a methodology that prevents bias based on race, diagnosis, prognosis, or history, socioeconomics, or other personal factors. [92] The application of the Depravity Standard distinguishes particular crimes by their severity relative to other comparable crimes. For example, the Depravity Standard's application will enable the distinction of the worst of murder relative to other murders, the worst of assault relative to other assaults, and the worst of white collar crimes and thefts relative to comparable crimes. [93]

The Depravity Standard is an inventory of evidence relating to the different stages of a crime – before, during, and after. The Depravity Scale, an internet-based series of surveys and a component of the Depravity Standard research, [94] has established public consensus for what aspects of a crime are most heinous. [91] The Depravity Standard, informed in part by this data, by higher court decisions, and by evidence from adjudicated cases, [95] is not a psychological evaluation or test. [94] Rather, it is an inventory to guide inexperienced jurors on what qualities of a crime may distinguish its severity if they believe them to be present. [91]

The Depravity Standard research has inspired Welner's research into the CIEEO (Clinical Inventory of the Everyday Extreme and Outrageous), a 14-item inventory of non-criminal everyday evil reflecting a range of an actor's intent and effects on a victim. [96] Unlike the Depravity Standard, the CIEEO is being developed to apply in clinical and screening settings to flag behaviors that warrant treatment or other intervention in order to prevent consequences at home, workplace, or community. [97] The CIEEO is inspired by the goals of vigilance for child abuse – namely, detection and identification being the first step toward intervention and treatment of the worst of behaviors. [96]

Welner researched and developed the typology for classifying drug-facilitated sex assaulters. Such offenders are distinguished by setting, be it workplace, in social interactions, or doctors. The offenders found in each of these separate settings exhibit particular qualities. [98]

Public policy

Welner was a key contributor a range of proposals within landmark mental health reform legislation that passed the United States Congress in 2016. [99] He testified to lawmakers on multiple occasions prior to the bill's eventual passage. [100] [101] Apart from advocating various ideas to expand crisis mental health services and to attract talent to treat the underserved, Welner also argued for the reform of commitment law, and reform of HIPAA, as a means to prevent both suicide and homicide outcomes. Welner was under serious consideration by the Trump Administration as Assistant Secretary of Mental Health in the Department of Health and Human Services, [102] a position created to direct mental health and substance abuse policy in the United States.

Among his writings, Welner had long advocated for upgrading the integrity of forensic mental health through the videotaping of forensic psychiatry interviews, transparent exchange of notes, and peer review. His efforts to mandate videotaping of forensic mental health interviews resulted in laws passed in Illinois [103] and Colorado.

In 1992 and 1993, Welner was a media coordinator and spokesperson for the Ross Perot presidential election campaign in New York and the citizen action organization United We Stand America, also in New York. [104] [105] During the 1992 election campaign, Welner debated in support of Perot against other candidates' representatives.

Media consultation, writings, and commentary

Welner has been a contributor to numerous major network news programs. He was a forensic science consultant to ABC News' Law and Justice unit, [106] and familiar to many viewers in particular of Good Morning America [107] and 20/20.[ citation needed ] He has otherwise been a regular contributor to CNN, [108] Fox News, [109] Larry King Live , Bill Bennett's Morning in America, [110] [111] [112] and the Dr. Oz Show , [113] [114] on issues relating to forensic psychiatry and forensic science. [115] [116] [117] [118]

Personal and professional background

Born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Welner is the youngest of four children. Both his parents were born in Poland and lost their families in the Holocaust. His father Nick was civil engineer; his mother Barbara, who dropped out of school as a wartime refugee, entered nursing school in Britain unable to speak English and finished as valedictorian, going on to specialize in gerontology. Welner's oldest sister, Sandra Welner, was a Maryland-based gynecologist who fought through severe neurological disabilities suffered in a stroke became internationally renowned for her medical research and advocacy for the medical care of the disabled. [119]

Welner graduated high school at the age of 15, then attended the University of Miami, where he earned a B.S. in biology, before moving on to the University of Miami School of Medicine. [120] While an undergraduate and medical student, he announced radio play-by-play for the University of Miami Hurricanes baseball and football teams—he would later credit game announcing as his best training for future success as a testifying expert witness. [121]

He has maintained a clinical practice since 1992, specializing in patients who have difficulty responding to treatment, and has been Board Certified in Psychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry, Psychopharmacology and Disaster Medicine. [122] He is married to Orli Welner, a corporate attorney. [123]

Selected bibliography

Related Research Articles

The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is an affirmative defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to a psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act. This is contrasted with an excuse of provocation, in which the defendant is responsible, but the responsibility is lessened due to a temporary mental state. It is also contrasted with the justification of self defense or with the mitigation of imperfect self-defense. The insanity defense is also contrasted with a finding that a defendant cannot stand trial in a criminal case because a mental disease prevents them from effectively assisting counsel, from a civil finding in trusts and estates where a will is nullified because it was made when a mental disorder prevented a testator from recognizing the natural objects of their bounty, and from involuntary civil commitment to a mental institution, when anyone is found to be gravely disabled or to be a danger to themself or to others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart</span> 2002 child abduction case in the U.S.

Elizabeth Ann Smart was kidnapped at age fourteen on June 5, 2002, by Brian Mitchell from her home in the Federal Heights neighborhood of Salt Lake City, Utah. She was held captive by Mitchell and his wife, Wanda Barzee, on the outskirts of Salt Lake City, and later, in San Diego County, California. Her captivity lasted approximately nine months before she was discovered in Sandy, Utah, approximately 18 miles (29 km) from her home.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrea Yates</span> American murder defendant (born 1964)

Andrea Pia Yates is an American woman from Houston, Texas, who confessed to drowning her five children in their bathtub on June 20, 2001. The case of Yates—who had exhibited severe postpartum depression, postpartum psychosis, and schizophrenia leading up to the murders—placed the M'Naghten rules, along with the irresistible impulse test for sanity, under close public scrutiny in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic psychology</span> Using psychological science to help answer legal questions

Forensic psychology is the practice of psychology applied to the law. Forensic psychology is the application of scientific knowledge and methods to help answer legal questions arising in criminal, civil, contractual, or other judicial proceedings. Forensic psychology includes research on various psychology-law topics, such as jury selection, reducing systemic racism in criminal law, eyewitness testimony, evaluating competency to stand trial, or assessing military veterans for service-connected disability compensation. The American Psychological Association's Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists reference several psychology subdisciplines, such as social, clinical, experimental, counseling, and neuropsychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic psychiatry</span> Subspeciality of psychiatry, related to criminology

Forensic psychiatry is a subspeciality of psychiatry and is related to criminology. It encompasses the interface between law and psychiatry. According to the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, it is defined as "a subspecialty of psychiatry in which scientific and clinical expertise is applied in legal contexts involving civil, criminal, correctional, regulatory, or legislative matters, and in specialized clinical consultations in areas such as risk assessment or employment." A forensic psychiatrist provides services – such as determination of competency to stand trial – to a court of law to facilitate the adjudicative process and provide treatment, such as medications and psychotherapy, to criminals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miscarriage of justice</span> Conviction of a person for a crime that they did not commit

A miscarriage of justice occurs when an unfair outcome occurs in a criminal or civil proceeding, such as the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. Miscarriages are also known as wrongful convictions. Innocent people have sometimes ended up in prison for years before their conviction has eventually been overturned. They may be exonerated if new evidence comes to light or it is determined that the police or prosecutor committed some kind of misconduct at the original trial. In some jurisdictions this leads to the payment of compensation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1999 Honolulu shootings</span> 1999 mass murder in Honolulu, Hawaii, US

The 1999 Honolulu shootings or the Xerox murders were an incident of mass murder that occurred on November 2, 1999, in a Xerox Corporation building in Honolulu, Hawaii, United States. Service technician Byran Koji Uyesugi shot at eight people; wounding seven fatally. This was the worst mass shooting in the history of Hawaii.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sture Bergwall</span> Swedish alleged serial killer

Sture Ragnar Bergwall, also known as Thomas Quick from 1993–2002, is a Swedish man previously believed to have been a serial killer, having confessed to more than 30 murders while detained in a mental institution for personality disorders. Between 1994 and 2001, Quick was convicted of eight of these murders. However, he withdrew all of his confessions in 2008. As a result, his murder convictions were quashed, the final one in July 2013, and he was released from hospital. The episode raised issues about how murder convictions could have been obtained on such weak evidence, and has been called the largest miscarriage of justice in Swedish history. Journalists Hannes Råstam and Dan Josefsson published TV documentaries and books about the murder cases; they claimed that bad therapy led to false confessions. Dan Josefsson claims that a "cult"-like group led by psychologist Margit Norell manipulated the police and talked Sture Bergwall into false confessions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omar Khadr</span> Canadian former child soldier (b. 1982)

Omar Ahmed Said Khadr is a Canadian who at the age of 15 was detained by the United States at Guantanamo Bay for ten years, during which he pleaded guilty to the murder of U.S. Army Sergeant 1st Class Christopher Speer and other charges. He later appealed his conviction, claiming that he falsely pleaded guilty so that he could return to Canada where he remained in custody for three additional years. Khadr sued the Canadian government for infringing his rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; this lawsuit was settled in 2017 with a CA$10.5 million payment and an apology by the federal government.

Park Elliot Dietz is a forensic psychiatrist who has consulted or testified in many of the highest profile US criminal cases, including spousal killer Betty Broderick, mass murderer Jared Lee Loughner, and serial killers Joel Rifkin, Arthur Shawcross, Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Kaczynski, Richard Kuklinski, the D.C. sniper attacks, and William Bonin.

In United States and Canadian law, competence concerns the mental capacity of an individual to participate in legal proceedings or transactions, and the mental condition a person must have to be responsible for his or her decisions or acts. Competence is an attribute that is decision-specific. Depending on various factors which typically revolve around mental function integrity, an individual may or may not be competent to make a particular medical decision, a particular contractual agreement, to execute an effective deed to real property, or to execute a will having certain terms.

A false confession is an admission of guilt for a crime which the individual did not commit. Although such confessions seem counterintuitive, they can be made voluntarily, perhaps to protect a third party, or induced through coercive interrogation techniques. When some degree of coercion is involved, studies have found that subjects with highly sophisticated intelligence or manipulated by their so called "friends" are more likely to make such confessions. Young people are particularly vulnerable to confessing, especially when stressed, tired, or traumatized, and have a significantly higher rate of false confessions than adults. Hundreds of innocent people have been convicted, imprisoned, and sometimes sentenced to death after confessing to crimes they did not commit—but years later, have been exonerated. It was not until several shocking false confession cases were publicized in the late 1980s, combined with the introduction of DNA evidence, that the extent of wrongful convictions began to emerge—and how often false confessions played a role in these.

Richard Jason Ofshe is an American sociologist and professor emeritus of sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. He is known for his expert testimony relating to coercion in small groups, confessions, and interrogations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wrongful conviction of David Camm</span> American police officer wrongfully convicted of murder (born 1964)

David Ray Camm is a former trooper of the Indiana State Police (ISP) who spent 13 years in prison after twice being wrongfully convicted of the murders of his wife, Kimberly, and his two young children at their home in Georgetown, Indiana, on September 28, 2000. He was released from custody in 2013 after his third trial resulted in an acquittal. Charles Boney is currently serving time for the murders of Camm's wife and two children.

The Norfolk Four are four former United States Navy sailors: Joseph J. Dick Jr., Derek Tice, Danial Williams, and Eric C. Wilson, who were wrongfully convicted of the 1997 rape and murder of Michelle Moore-Bosko while they were stationed at Naval Station Norfolk. They each declared that they had made false confessions, and their convictions are considered highly controversial. A fifth man, Omar Ballard, confessed and pleaded guilty to the crime in 2000, insisting that he had acted alone. He had been in prison since 1998 because of violent attacks on two other women in 1997. He was the only one of the suspects whose DNA matched that collected at the crime scene, and whose confession was consistent with other forensic evidence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guantanamo Bay detainment camp library</span> Library

The library made available to detainees held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba, is notable for the controversy it has stirred.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas W. Hartmann</span>

Thomas W. Hartmann is an American lawyer and officer in the United States Air Force Reserve. He has 32 years of criminal, commercial and civil litigation experience. Between 1983 and 1991 he was a prosecutor and defense counsel in the Air Force, including duties as Chief Air Force Prosecutor in Asia-Pacific Region. From 1991 to 1996 he was an associate at Bryan Cave LLP and at SBC Communications. In 1996 he became senior counsel for mergers & acquisitions for SBC Communications closing multiple deals worth several billion dollars in U.S., Europe, and South America as well as negotiating a strategic partnering agreement with a global internet service provider. From 1998 onwards he was general counsel for SBC Communications (1999–2001), Orius Corp. (2001–2004) and MxEnergy Inc. (2005–2007) in domestic and international settings. In July 2007 Brigadier General Hartmann was appointed the legal adviser to the convening authority in the Department of Defense Office of Military Commissions. In September 2008, as a result of the expansion of the commission efforts that General Hartmann had led, Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England elevated General Hartmann to become the director of operations, planning, and development for the commissions. Hartmann reported to Susan J. Crawford, a retired judge, who was the convening authority until March 2010.

In the United States criminal justice system, a competency evaluation is an assessment of the ability of a defendant to understand and rationally participate in a court process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courthouse facility dog</span>

In the United States, a courthouse facility dog is a professionally trained facility dog that has graduated from an accredited assistance dog organization that is a member of Assistance Dogs International. Such dogs assist crime victims, witnesses and others during the investigation and prosecution of crimes, as well as during other legal proceedings. Courthouse facility dogs also provide assistance to Drug Court and Mental Health Court participants during their recovery from drugs, alcohol, mental illness and posttraumatic stress disorder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murders of Claudia Maupin and Oliver Northup</span> 2013 double-murder

On April 14, 2013, Oliver "Chip" Northup Jr. and his wife Claudia Maupin were tortured, murdered, and mutilated by Daniel William Marsh in the couple's Davis, California home. Marsh, who was 15 years old at the time of the murders, had an extensive history of antisocial and violent behavior. A diagnosed psychopath, Marsh had long been fantasizing about torturing and murdering people and desired to become a serial killer. The high-profile murders have impacted the policy debate surrounding the sentencing of juvenile offenders.

References

  1. Edwards, Steven. "Being Omar Khadr means never having to say you're sorry". fullcomment.nationalpost.com. Retrieved 2014-02-19.
  2. Psychiatry, the Law, and Depravity: Profile of Michael Welner, M.D., trutv.com, 22 December 2008
  3. "Interview with Michael Welner". Criminaljusticeprograms.com. Retrieved 2012-10-04.
  4. Lee, Stephen J. "From Death Row, Rodriguez discusses murder of Dru Sjodin". Grand Forks Herald. Retrieved 2014-02-20.
  5. Taylor, Drew. "Bond Revoked for Harvey Updyke". Opelika-Auburn News. Retrieved 2014-02-20.
  6. Welner, Michael. "Selected Court Cases". The Forensic Panel. Retrieved 2014-02-20.
  7. Setrakian, Lara (2006-07-27). "Despite Not Guilty Verdict, Doctor Who Examined Yates is Unconvinced". abcnews.go.com. Retrieved 2014-02-19.
  8. Perkel, Colin (2012-07-24). "'I'm OK around anybody,' Omar Khadr says in interview sought by Vic Toews". news.nationalpost.com. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  9. Effron, Lauren (2011-08-19). "Dr. Michael Welner Describes Evaluating Elizabeth Smart's Kidnapper Brian David Mitchell". abcnews.go.com. Retrieved 2014-02-19.
  10. Totenberg, Nina (2013-12-11). "Supreme Court Bolsters Prosecutor's Use of Psychiatric Exam". npr.org. Retrieved 2014-02-19.
  11. Burgess, Ann Wolbert; Welner, Michael; Willis, Danny G. (2010). "Educator Sexual Abuse: Two Case Reports". Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 19. 19 (4): 387–402. doi:10.1080/10538712.2010.495045. PMID   20672208. S2CID   205714193.
  12. Welner, M.; Mastellon T; Stewart J; Weinert B; Stratton J (December 2012). "Peer-Reviewed Forensic Consultation: Safeguarding Expert Testimony and Protecting the Uninformed Court". JI Forensic Psychology Practice: 1–34.
  13. Douglas, J.; Burgess, A. W.; Burgess, A. G.; Ressler, R. K. (2013). Crime Classification Manual: A standard system for investigating and classifying violent crime. John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Reinhard, K; Welner M; Okoye M; Marotta M; Plank G; Anderson B; Mastellon T (January 2013). "Applying Forensic Anthropological Data in Homicide Investigation to The Depravity Standard". Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 20. 20 (1): 27–39. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2012.04.018. PMID   23217373.
  15. Barton, Valerie L. (2009). "Knowing Evil When We See It: An Attempt to Standardize Heinous, Atrocious, and Cruel". Nova Law Review. 33 (679).
  16. Welner, M.; Robinson, D. (2013-01-28). "Three Steps That Can Upgrade Psychiatric Evidence". National Law Journal.
  17. Robinson, D.; Welner, M. (2013-10-31). "Judges can Follow Certain Standards so Evidence Doesn't Mislead". Chicago Daily Law Bulletin.
  18. Morgan, Piers (2013-12-06). "Hollywood's Role in Violence". CNN.com. Retrieved 2014-02-19.
  19. View, The. "Forensic Psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner on THE VIEW". abc.go.com. Retrieved 2014-02-19.[ dead YouTube link ]
  20. Druckerman, Shana; Sher, Lauren (2010-05-25). "Aaron Vargas Regrets Killing Alleged Abuser". abcnews.go.com. Retrieved 2014-02-20.
  21. Winfrey, Oprah. "The Boy Who Killed His Molester". Oprah Winfrey Show. Retrieved 2014-02-20.
  22. Murphy, Timothy. "Mental Illness and Violence". C-SPAN . Retrieved 2014-02-19.
  23. "Prosecutors paid massive amount to expert in Etan Patz case". NY Daily News. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  24. Rojas, Rick; Pastor, Kate (2017). "Closing Arguments Set to Begin in Etan Patz Murder Retrial". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  25. "Evil Genius". Pacific Standard. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  26. "Pedro Hernandez admitted killing Etan Patz twice in 2 years". NY Daily News. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  27. 1 2 3 Effron, Lauren (2011-08-19). "Dr. Michael Welner Describes Evaluating Elizabeth Smart's Kidnapper Brian David Mitchell". Nightline. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  28. "The Forensic Psychiatrist Behind the Elizabeth Smart Case". www.doctoroz.com. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  29. 1 2 "Brian David Mitchell CST Report" (PDF). (1.56 MB)
  30. "Brian David Mitchell Memorandum Decision" (PDF). (552 KB)
  31. "Judge: Kidnapping Suspect Competent for Trial". Associated Press. 2010-03-01. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  32. Reavy, Pat (2009-12-08). "Brian David Mitchell stalked other girls, doctor says". Deseret News. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  33. Effron, Lauren; Schabner, Dean (2011-08-19). "Newly Released Video of Elizabeth Smart Kidnapper Brian David Mitchell Singing Hymns in Competency Interview". Nightline. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  34. Dobner, Jennifer (2011-07-11). "No Appeal For Elizabeth Smart Kidnapper Brian David Mitchell". Associated Press. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  35. Ramsland, Katherine M. (2005). Inside the Minds of Mass Murderers: Why They Kill. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN   9780275984755.
  36. "Honolulu Star-Bulletin Hawaii News". archives.starbulletin.com. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  37. 1 2 "Honolulu Star-Bulletin Hawaii News". archives.starbulletin.com. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  38. "Xerox repairman convicted in killings". DeseretNews.com. 2000-06-14. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  39. "A guide to mental health professionals who saw theater shooting gunman". The Denver Post. 2015-07-10. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  40. mcq495 (2007-05-02), Welner: Showing VT Killer's Video Is 'Social Catastrophe' , retrieved 2018-04-14
  41. "FindLaw's Supreme Court of Pennsylvania case and opinions". Findlaw. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  42. "Calloway v. State". Justia Law. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  43. "Commonwealth v. Baumhammers, R., Aplt (Majority Opinion)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  44. "Commonwealth v. Taylor, Ronald (Majority Opinion)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  45. "Noted forensic psychiatrist, Dr. Michael Welner, on NBC's approach this week in the Virginia Tech shooting, and the correct approach in understanding schizophrenia. « The Hugh Hewitt Show". The Hugh Hewitt Show. 2007-04-20. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  46. "Toomer's Corner Oaks coming down". ESPN.com News Services. 2013-02-02. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  47. Scott, David (2012). "Front & Center: Paul Finebaum on ESPN Films' 'Roll Tide/War Eagle'". ESPN Front Row. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  48. Culpepper, Ben (2012-09-26). "Harvey Updyke arrested in Louisiana home improvement store on terrorizing charge". ABC 3340. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  49. Tomlinson, Tommy (2013-11-27). "Alabama Vs. Auburn: The Biggest (And Craziest) College Football Game Of The Year". Forbes.com. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  50. Woodberry, Evan (2011-02-20). "Toomer's Corner trees: Postings on Alabama message board raise new questions". Auburn Bureau. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  51. Enoch, Ed (2013-02-13). "Lee County judge revokes bond for Harvey Updyke Jr" . Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  52. Enoch, Ed (2013-03-22). "Harvey Updyke pleads guilty to poisoning Toomer's Oaks" . Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  53. Journalism, Uncommon (2013-12-22). "Uncommon Journalism: After Newtown, Seeking Psychiatric Solutions to Mass Shootings". Uncommon Journalism. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  54. "Interview with Forensic Psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner, M.D.: Part Two". Criminal Justice Degree Schools. 2011-02-09. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  55. Williams, Pete (2005-06-01). "Convictions Overturned for Mom Who Drowned 5 Kids". NBC News. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  56. Setrakian, Lara (2006-07-27). "Despite 'Not Guilty' Verdict, Doctor Who Examined Yates Is Unconvinced". ABC News. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  57. Lezon, Dale (2006-07-13). "Yates not 'grossly psychotic' before drownings, Dietz testifies". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved 2014-03-14.
  58. Welner, Michael (2006-12-03). "What the Yates Jury Never Knew". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  59. O'Hare, Peggy (2006-06-23). "Yates jurors asked to set aside preconceptions". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  60. "Andrea Yates, the Texas Mom who Drowned her Kids". Crimelibrary.com. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  61. Shannon (2011-02-09). "Interview with Forensic Psychiatrist Michael Welner, M.D.: Part One" . Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  62. Behar, Joy (2011-06-15). "Casey Anthony Murder Trial; Interview With Gene Simmons, Shannon Tweed". Joy Behar Show, CNN. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  63. 1 2 "Errol D. Beumel, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  64. "Experts clash over killer's mental state". old.post-gazette.com. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  65. "Dr: No mental illness". Brownsville Herald. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  66. 1 2 Purpura, Paul (2012-09-28). "Angola death row inmate who gave false confession released after 15 years". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2014-03-21.
  67. 1 2 "Damon Thibodeaux Press Release" (PDF). (16 KB)
  68. "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PATRICK J. FREE". Justia Law. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  69. "People v Oliver". Justia Law. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  70. "The People of the State of New York v. Natavia Lowery" (PDF). New York Law Journal. January 11, 2010.
  71. Kurtz, Todd (July 2, 2018). "Why would Michelle Martens give false statements? An expert explains why". KOAT Action News 7.
  72. 1 2 "Supreme Court Opinion Kansas v Cheever" (PDF). (100 KB)
  73. 1 2 "STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Scott D. CHEEVER, Appellant". Supreme Court of Kansas. 2012-08-24. Retrieved 2014-03-28.
  74. "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION" (PDF).
  75. "Dru Sjodin's killer speaks from death row" . Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  76. "State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark – CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  77. "Witness: Renfro has behavioral disorder" . Retrieved 2017-11-03.
  78. "United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit" (PDF).
  79. 1 2 "US vs Omar Khadr Report" (PDF). (3.33 MB)
  80. 1 2 Gollum, Mark (2012-07-19). "Omar Khadr: Peace-loving Canadian or al-Qaeda royalty?". CBC News. Retrieved 2014-03-28.
  81. Levant, Ezra (2012-05-29). "Omar Was Not A Child Soldier". The Source. Retrieved 2014-03-28.
  82. "US vs Omar Khadr Suppression Motions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-11-01. (2.63 MB)
  83. 1 2 3 "Dr. Welner Testimony Transcript" (PDF). (1.56 MB)
  84. Joscelyn, Thomas (2011-04-25). "A False Martyr" . Retrieved 2014-03-28.
  85. Perkel, Colin (2012-07-24). "'I'm OK around anybody,' Omar Khadr says in interview sought by Vic Toews". Canadian Press. Retrieved 2014-03-28.
  86. Freeze, Colin (2012-10-01). "Minister's Khadr comments threaten parole system's integrity: lawyers". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2014-03-28.
  87. "Omar Khadr won't be moved from federal prison after judge denies application". Canadian Press. 2013-10-18. Retrieved 2014-03-28.
  88. Austen, Ian (2015-05-07). "Omar Khadr, Former Guantánamo Detainee, Is Released on Bail in Canada". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  89. Ramsland, Katherine. "Profile of Dr. Michael Welner forensic psychiatrist - The Crime Library — Forensic Psychiatry — Crime Library on". Trutv.com. Retrieved 2012-10-04.
  90. Tucker, Neely (2007-07-23). "Giving Evil the Eye". Washington Post. Retrieved 2014-03-20.
  91. 1 2 3 Welner, Michael; Douglas, J.; Burgess, A. W.; Burgess, A. G.; Ressler, R. K. (2013). "Classifying crimes by severity: From aggravators to depravity". Crime classification manual: A standard system for investigating and classifying violent crime. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 55–72.
  92. Welner, Michael (2003). "Response to Simon: Legal Relevance Demands That Evil Be Defined and Standardized". The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 31 (4): 417–421. PMID   14974795.
  93. Welner, M. (2009). "The justice and therapeutic promise of science-based research on criminal evil". The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 37 (4): 442–449. PMID   20018993.
  94. 1 2 Welner, Michael. "The Depravity Standard" . Retrieved 2014-03-20.
  95. "The Depravity Standard: A Call for Large Scale Homicide Case Research". Empire State Prosecutor. 2010. pp. 14–17.
  96. 1 2 Robinson, David (2013-12-26). "Seeking a Better, Fairer Method of Determining Parental Rights". Chicago Daily Law Bulletin.
  97. Welner, M; Mastellon, T. (2011). "Defining Evil Through the Depravity Standard and the Clinicians Inventory for the Everyday Extreme and Outrageous". Journal of Social Sciences. 1 (8): 41–49.
  98. LeBeau, M. (2001). "Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault". The Perpetrators and Their Modus Operandi. London: Academic Press.
  99. "Rep. Murphy blasts Trump's pick for mental health post". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  100. "Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act of 2013 - Energy and Commerce Committee". Energy and Commerce Committee. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  101. "Dr. Michael Welner". C-SPAN.org. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  102. "White House pick for mental health czar causes stir". www.mdedge.com. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  103. "Evil Genius". Pacific Standard. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  104. CQ congressional quarterly weekly report - Congressional Quarterly, inc - Google Books. 1956. Retrieved 2012-10-04.
  105. "Memo Bares Perot Unit's Vigil Plan". Pqasb.pqarchiver.com. Retrieved 2012-10-04.
  106. "Welcome to the ABC News Law and Justice Unit". ABC News. 2007-04-28. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  107. "Watch Good Morning America TV Show - ABC.com". ABC. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  108. "CNN - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos". CNN. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  109. "Fox News". Fox News. 2018-04-15. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  110. The Forensic Panel (2015-03-16), Michael Welner, M.D. on Bill Bennett's Morning in America - Root of ISIS Appeal, archived from the original on 2021-12-21, retrieved 2018-04-16
  111. The Forensic Panel (2015-08-27), Dr. Welner on Bill Bennett: WDBJ Shootings & Crisis Mental Health, archived from the original on 2021-12-21, retrieved 2018-04-16
  112. The Forensic Panel (2015-03-30), Germanwings Mass-Murder: Dr. Michael Welner on Bill Bennett's Morning in America, archived from the original on 2021-12-21, retrieved 2018-04-16
  113. "Dr. Oz; True Crime Thursday, and what drives someone to lie about their own abduction" . Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  114. "The Forensic Psychiatrist Behind the Elizabeth Smart Case". www.doctoroz.com. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  115. "Madoff victims count their losses". 2009-02-19. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  116. "Inside the Mind of John Karr". ABC News. 2006-08-30. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  117. "CNN.com - Transcripts". transcripts.cnn.com. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  118. mcq495 (2007-05-02), Welner: Showing VT Killer's Video Is 'Social Catastrophe' , retrieved 2018-04-16
  119. Welner, Sandra (2003). Welner's Guide to the Care of Women with Disabilities: A Comprehensive Guide to Care. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN   978-0781735322.
  120. "Inside Criminal Minds Alumnus Michael Welner is one of the nation's top forensic psychiatrists" (PDF).
  121. "Interview with Forensic Psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner, M.D.: Part Two". Criminal Justice Degree Schools. 2011-02-09. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  122. "Expert Witness | Forensic Science Experts | The Forensic Panel". www.forensicpanel.com. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  123. "Inside Criminal Minds Alumnus Michael Welner is one of the nation's top forensic psychiatrists" (PDF).