Michelle Murphy

Last updated
Michelle Murphy
Born
Claudette Michelle Murphy [1]

1969 [1]
NationalityCanadian, American
Alma mater Harvard University, University of Toronto
Known forRegimes of imperceptibility, environmental justice
Awards Ludwik Fleck Prize (2008 and 2019)
Scientific career
FieldsHistory of science, philosophy of science
Institutions University of Toronto
External videos
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg “Abduction, Reproduction, and Postcolonial Infrastructures of Data”, Michelle Murphy, S&F Online

Michelle Murphy (born 1969) [1] is a Canadian academic. She is a professor of history and women and gender studies at the University of Toronto and director of the Technoscience Research Unit. [2]

Contents

Murphy is well known for her work on regimes of imperceptibility, the ways in which different forms of knowledge become visible or invisible in the scientific community and broader society. Murphy has published several books, including Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers (2006) which won the Ludwik Fleck Prize from the Society for Social Studies of Science, [3] [4] Seizing the Means of Reproduction: Entanglements of Feminism, Health, and Technoscience (2012), and The Economization of Life (2017).

Early life and education

Claudette Michelle Murphy was born in 1969 [1] and grew up in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Her family background includes Metis [5] and French heritage. [6]

Murphy was inspired by the work of feminists in science in the mid-eighties, including Donna Haraway and Ruth Hubbard. [5] She earned a bachelor's degree in Biology and History and Philosophy of Science and Technology from the University of Toronto in 1992. She earned a Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1998. [7] Her experience at Harvard led her to incorporate analysis of whiteness explicitly into her work on science. [5]

In the 1990s, Murphy worked with Evelynn M. Hammonds and her working group on race and science at MIT. From 1996-2007, she edited RaceSci, a website on anti-racist studies in science, medicine, and technology. With Adele Clarke and others at the Society for the Social Studies of Science, she organized panels on race and science. [5]

Career

Murphy is interested in asking the question "What can feminist technoscience be?" [5] She studies the recent history of science and technology with particular attention to economics, capitalism, the environment, and reproduction, with an awareness of colonialism, feminism, gender, race, and queer theory. [5] [8]

She focuses on Canada, [9] [10] the United States, Bangladesh, and issues around chemical exposure, environmental justice, and reproductive justice. [5] [11] Landscapes of Exposure: Knowledge and Illness in Modern Environments, which she co-edited with Gregg Mitman and Chris Sellers in 2004, has been called "a foundational volume in bringing historical and social science perspectives to bear on the intersection of place and disease." [12]

Murphy is known for the concept of regimes of imperceptibility, a framework for examining the ways in which different forms of knowledge become visible or invisible within scientific communities and society. [13]

... by analyzing "regimes of perceptibility", she reveals how the politics of knowledge production and the process of materialization involve obscuring awareness of certain things in order to make others more pronounced, known, and thus controllable.... Murphy demonstrates how the power-laden raced/classed/gendered regimes of perceptibility also create "domains of imperceptibility" that may be acted upon as an inventive space. [14]

She develops these ideas in Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers (2006). She traces the history of sick building syndrome (SBS), a diagnosis applied to mass health complaints by office workers for which no cause can be identified. [12] She closely examines the ways in which the identification of a new disease was affected by "a congeries of unlikely forces" including both scientific and social factors. [15] The identification and acceptance of SBS, an inherently uncertain diagnosis, involves gender, race, and power dynamics within "normal science." [14] This raises the question "How do we come to presence the effects of capitalism in our lives, and how are those effects invisibilized?" [5] She also looks at the presentation of information in ways that drew on traditions from the labor and feminist movements. [12] The framework she introduces can be used by anthropological researchers for complex biopolitical analysis. [14] She received the Ludwik Fleck Prize (2008) from the Society for Social Studies of Science for this book. [3] [4]

Murphy is also the author of Seizing the Means of Reproduction: Entanglements of Feminism, Health, and Technoscience (2012). Her starting point is the work of radical feminists in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s, who advocated for alternative health techniques and feminist clinics. She goes on to place these developments in a broader framework, examining relationships between feminism, imperialism, capitalism, population control, and neoliberalism. [16] It is applauded for identifying critical junctures that were previously overlooked, and for its elegant examination of how the "economy of reproduction" operates in both developed and developing worlds. [17] Murphy has said:

I've been really interested in reproductive justice as you might normally think of it in terms of questions of reproductive health, birth, family planning, and population control, but I've also been very interested in asking the question, "Why do we think we know what reproduction is? Why do we think we know where it begins and ends?" In fact there's a wonderful rich world of thinking about the relations of reproduction, in which the idea that reproduction happens in your body is actually quite new. The idea of reproduction as confined to the body dates to the 1980s. Before that reproduction was always something that happened in the aggregate or the relation. [5]

Murphy continues to work on "Distributed Reproduction," a theorization of reproduction that would extend beyond the individual. [2]

Her book The Economization of Life (2017) explores the 20th century rise of techniques to value life based on economic and biopolitical concerns. Murphy examines the techniques and epistemologies that have been used to describe and connect ideas of populations and economics in the United States and Bangladesh. [18] This book was awarded the Ludwik Fleck Prize, making Murphy the first person to receive the award multiple times. [19]

Murphy is also working on "Alterlife in the Ongoing Aftermaths of Industrial Chemicals," an examination of the transgenerational effects of environmental damage from industrial chemicals in the Great Lakes region. [2]

Books

Awards

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Donna Haraway</span> Scholar in the field of science and technology studies

Donna J. Haraway is an American professor emerita in the history of consciousness and feminist studies departments at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and a prominent scholar in the field of science and technology studies. She has also contributed to the intersection of information technology and feminist theory, and is a leading scholar in contemporary ecofeminism. Her work criticizes anthropocentrism, emphasizes the self-organizing powers of nonhuman processes, and explores dissonant relations between those processes and cultural practices, rethinking sources of ethics.

Feminist theory is the extension of feminism into theoretical, fictional, or philosophical discourse. It aims to understand the nature of gender inequality. It examines women's and men's social roles, experiences, interests, chores, and feminist politics in a variety of fields, such as anthropology and sociology, communication, media studies, psychoanalysis, political theory, home economics, literature, education, and philosophy.

In common usage, technoscience refers to the entire long-standing global human activity of technology combined with the relatively recent scientific method that occurred primarily in Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries. Technoscience is the study of how humans interact with technology using the scientific method. Technoscience thus comprises the history of human application of technology and modern scientific methods, ranging from the early development of basic technologies for hunting, agriculture, or husbandry and all the way through atomic applications, biotechnology, robotics, and computer sciences. This more common and comprehensive usage of the term technoscience can be found in general textbooks and lectures concerning the history of science.

Sandra G. Harding is an American philosopher of feminist and postcolonial theory, epistemology, research methodology, and philosophy of science. She directed the UCLA Center for the Study of Women from 1996 to 2000, and co-edited Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society from 2000 to 2005. She is currently a Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Education and Gender Studies at UCLA and a Distinguished Affiliate Professor of Philosophy at Michigan State University. In 2013 she was awarded the John Desmond Bernal Prize by the Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S).

The Ludwik Fleck Prize is an annual award given for a book in the field of science and technology studies. It was created by the 4S Council in 1992 and is named after microbiologist Ludwik Fleck.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Londa Schiebinger</span> American historian (born 1952)

Londa Schiebinger is the John L. Hinds Professor of History of Science, Department of History, and by courtesy the d-school, Stanford University. She received her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1984. An international authority on the theory, practice, and history of gender and intersectionality in science, technology, and medicine, she is the founding Director of Gendered Innovations in Science, Medicine, Engineering, and Environment. She is an elected member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Schiebinger received honorary doctorates from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium (2013), from the Faculty of Science, Lund University, Sweden (2017), and from Universitat de València, Spain (2018). She was the first woman in the field of History to win the prestigious Alexander von Humboldt Research Prize in 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Annemarie Mol</span> Dutch ethnographer and philosopher

Annemarie Mol is a Dutch ethnographer and philosopher. She is the Professor of Anthropology of the Body at the University of Amsterdam.

Feminist anthropology is a four-field approach to anthropology that seeks to transform research findings, anthropological hiring practices, and the scholarly production of knowledge, using insights from feminist theory. Simultaneously, feminist anthropology challenges essentialist feminist theories developed in Europe and America. While feminists practiced cultural anthropology since its inception, it was not until the 1970s that feminist anthropology was formally recognized as a subdiscipline of anthropology. Since then, it has developed its own subsection of the American Anthropological Association – the Association for Feminist Anthropology – and its own publication, Feminist Anthropology. Their former journal Voices is now defunct.

Feminist political ecology is a feminist perspective on political ecology, drawing on theories from Marxism, post-structuralism, feminist geography, ecofeminism and cultural ecology. Feminist political ecology examines the place of intersectional social relations in the political ecological landscape, exploring them as a factor in ecological and political relations. Specific areas in which feminist political ecology is focused are development, landscape, resource use, agrarian reconstruction and rural-urban transformation. Feminist political ecologists suggest gender is a crucial variable – in relation to class, race and other relevant dimensions of political ecological life – in constituting access to, control over, and knowledge of natural resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ariel Salleh</span> Australian sociologist

Ariel Salleh is an Australian sociologist who writes on humanity-nature relations, political ecology, social change movements, and ecofeminism.

Karen Michelle Barad is an American feminist theorist and physicist, known particularly for their theory of agential realism.

Feminist epistemology is an examination of epistemology from a feminist standpoint.

Feminist technoscience is a transdisciplinary branch of science studies which emerged from decades of feminist critique on the way gender and other identity markers are entangled in the combined fields of science and technology. The term technoscience, especially in regard to the field of feminist technoscience studies, seeks to remove the distinction between scientific research and development with applied applications of technology while assuming science is entwined with the common interests of society. As a result, science is suggested to be held to the same level of political and ethical accountability as the technologies which develop from it. Feminist technoscience studies continue to develop new theories on how politics of gender and other identity markers are interconnected to resulting processes of technical change, and power relations of the globalized, material world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecofeminism</span> Approach to feminism influenced by ecologist movement

Ecofeminism is a branch of feminism and political ecology. Ecofeminist thinkers draw on the concept of gender to analyse the relationships between humans and the natural world. The term was coined by the French writer Françoise d'Eaubonne in her book Le Féminisme ou la Mort (1974). Ecofeminist theory asserts a feminist perspective of Green politics that calls for an egalitarian, collaborative society in which there is no one dominant group. Today, there are several branches of ecofeminism, with varying approaches and analyses, including liberal ecofeminism, spiritual/cultural ecofeminism, and social/socialist ecofeminism. Interpretations of ecofeminism and how it might be applied to social thought include ecofeminist art, social justice and political philosophy, religion, contemporary feminism, and poetry.

Leith Patricia Mullings was a Jamaican-born author, anthropologist and professor. She was president of the American Anthropological Association from 2011–2013, and was a Distinguished Professor of Anthropology at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Mullings was involved in organizing for progressive social justice, racial equality and economic justice as one of the founding members of the Black Radical Congress and in her role as President of the AAA. Under her leadership, the American Anthropological Association took up the issue of academic labor rights.

Banu Subramaniam is a professor of women, gender and sexuality studies at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Originally trained as a plant evolutionary biologist, she writes about social and cultural aspects of science as they relate to experimental biology. She advocates for activist science that creates knowledge about the natural world while being aware of its embeddedness in society and culture. She co-edited Making Threats: Biofears and Environmental Anxieties (2005) and Feminist Science Studies: A New Generation (2001). Her book Ghost Stories for Darwin: The Science of Variation and the Politics of Diversity (2014) was chosen as a Choice Outstanding Academic Title in 2015 and won the Society for Social Studies of Science Ludwik Fleck Prize for science and technology studies in 2016. Her most recent book, Holy Science: The Biopolitics of Hindu Nationalism (2019), won the Michelle Kendrick Prize for the best book from the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts in 2020.

Ilana Löwy, born in 1948 in Łódź, Poland, is a historian of biomedical sciences and a feminist. She works as a research director at an interdisciplinary and cross-institutional research unit CERMES-3, and is associated with the Department of Global Health and Social Medicine at King's College London, the Department of the History of Science at Harvard University and Casa de Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro.

Deboleena Roy is professor and chair of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and Neuroscience and Behavioral Biology at Emory University, former resident research fellow at the Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University, and a member of The NeuroGenderings Network. Previously, she was an assistant professor at San Diego State University. Starting in August 2020, she will be serving as the Senior Associate Dean of Faculty for Emory College of Arts and Sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feminist philosophy of science</span> Means of interpreting scientific evidence through a feminist lens

Feminist philosophy of science is a branch of feminist philosophy that seeks to understand how the acquirement of knowledge through scientific means has been influenced by notions of gender identity and gender roles in society. Feminist philosophers of science question how scientific research and scientific knowledge itself may be influenced and possibly compromised by the social and professional framework within which that research and knowledge is established and exists. The intersection of gender and science allows feminist philosophers to reexamine fundamental questions and truths in the field of science to reveal how gender biases may influence scientific outcomes. The feminist philosophy of science has been described as being located "at the intersections of the philosophy of science and feminist science scholarship" and has attracted considerable attention since the 1980s.

Feminist science and technology studies is a theoretical subfield of science and technology studies (STS), which explores how gender interacts with science and technology. The field emerged in the early 1980s alongside other relativist theories of STS which rejected the dominance of technological determinism, proposing that reality is multiple rather than fixed and prioritizing situated knowledges over scientific objectivity. Feminist STS's material-semiotic theory evolved to display a complex understanding of gender and technology relationships by the 2000s, notable scholars producing feminist critiques of scientific knowledge and the design and use of technologies. The co-constructive relationship between gender and technology contributed to feminist STS's rejection of binary gender roles by the twenty-first century, the field's framework expanding to incorporate principles of feminist technoscience and queer theory amidst widespread adoption of the internet.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Murphy, Michelle (Claudette Michelle)". LOC Authority Records. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  2. 1 2 3 "Michelle Murphy". University of Toronto. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 FISCHER, MICHAEL M. J. (February 2012). "ON METAPHOR: Reciprocity and Immunity" (PDF). Cultural Anthropology. 27 (1): 144–152. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01132.x. hdl: 1721.1/95956 .
  4. 1 2 3 "Ludwik Fleck Prize". Society for Social Studies of Science. Archived from the original on 9 October 2017. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Modell, Amanda. "Feminists in Science and Science Studies, Profile: Michelle Murphy". The Feminist Research Institute, UC Davis. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  6. ↑ Murphy, Michelle. "Michelle Murphy". Technopolitics Blog. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  7. ↑ "Michelle Murphy Professor, Department of History and Women and Gender Studies Institute Affiliated Faculty, CSUS". Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  8. ↑ Martin, Aryn; Myers, Natasha; Viseu, Ana (September 28, 2015). "The politics of care in technoscience". Social Studies of Science. 45 (5): 625–641. doi:10.1177/0306312715602073. PMID   26630814. S2CID   29548363.
  9. ↑ Murphy, Michelle (Summer 2013). "Distributed Reproduction, Chemical Violence, and Latency". S&F Online. 11 (3). Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  10. ↑ Murphy, Michelle (October 2008). "Chemical Regimes of Living". Environmental History. 13 (4): 695–703. JSTOR   25473297.
  11. ↑ Stevens, Lindsay M. (December 2016). "Environmental Contaminants and Reproductive Bodies". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 57 (4): 471–485. doi:10.1177/0022146516671569. PMID   27803265. S2CID   30571795.
  12. 1 2 3 Cohen, Benjamin. "Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Author Michelle Murphy Discusses". Science Blogs. Retrieved September 8, 2008.
  13. ↑ Cloatre, Emilie; Pickersgill, Martyn (2013). Knowledge, technology and law : at the intersection of socio-legal and science & technology studies. Oxon, New York: Routledge. pp. 191–193. ISBN   9780415628624 . Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  14. 1 2 3 Garrison, Laura (2013-04-22). "Human Capital and its Maximization Knowledge, Resistance and Labor". The Anthropology of Biopolitics A blog about Knowledge, Power, and the Individual in Society Today. Retrieved April 22, 2013.
  15. ↑ Isenberg, Andrew C. (2014). The Oxford handbook of environmental history. Oxford University Press. p. 91. ISBN   978-0195324907 . Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  16. ↑ Sethna, C. (22 May 2014). "Michelle Murphy, Seizing the Means of Reproduction: Entanglements of Feminism, Health, and Technoscience". Social History of Medicine. 27 (3): 609–610. doi:10.1093/shm/hku022.
  17. ↑ Tunc, Tanfer Emin (2014). "Seizing the Means of Reproduction: Entanglements of Feminism, Health, and Technoscience by Michelle Murphy". American Studies. 53 (1): 248–249. doi:10.1353/ams.2014.0024. S2CID   145013842.
  18. ↑ "The Economization of Life Michelle Murphy" (PDF). Books and Journals, Spring 2017. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  19. ↑ "U of T technoscience researcher wins Fleck Prize, the first academic to win it twice".
  20. ↑ Round, July (2010-02-25). "2010 Geddes W. Simpson Distinguished Lecturer Announced". University of Maine. Retrieved February 25, 2010.
  21. ↑ "Announcement of JHI Faculty Research Fellowships for 2016-2017". University of Toronto. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  22. ↑ "Michelle Murphy". Clayman Institute for Gender Research. Stanford University. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  23. ↑ "Leading experts in science, gender studies, policy formation to be in residence". Stanford Report. June 6, 2007. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  24. ↑ "Michelle Murphy".
  25. ↑ "Royal Society of Canada Class of 2020" (PDF). rsc-src.ca. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.