Mylapore clique

Last updated
Dewan Bahadur Sir V. Bhashyam Aiyangar CIE V. Bhashyam Iyengar.png
Dewan Bahadur Sir V. Bhashyam Aiyangar CIE
Dewan Bahadur Sachivottama Sir C. P. Ramaswami Iyer KCSI KCIE CP Ramaswami Aiyar.jpg
Dewan Bahadur Sachivottama Sir C. P. Ramaswami Iyer KCSI KCIE

The Mylapore Clique or oligarchy [1] (also faction, [2] [3] group, [4] set, [3] or cabal [5] ) was a small coterie, amounting to a "handful" [6] of politically moderate, elite [6] Brahmins, primarily Tamil Brahmins, many of them noted lawyers, administrators, academics or educators, or industrialists, [7] in the Madras Presidency, who 'wielded almost exclusive influence and patronage in the service and government appointments', [6] 'controlled the flow of resources out of the institutions of the capital' [8] and 'dominated the professional and political life of [the presidency].' [9] Informal and exclusive, it was historically controlled by two extended families, the Vembaukum Iyengars, and the Calamur Viravalli-Chetpet Iyers, [10] and took its name from the luxurious Madras City neighborhood in which many leading members kept mansions. The clique coalesced and began its dominance in the 1880s and 1890s under the headship of Sir V. Bhashyam Aiyangar and Sir S. Subramania Iyer, [11] with R. Raghunatha Rao as a tertiary leader; [12] while some argue that it reached its zenith between 1910 and 1920, [13] others highlight its remarkable successes in ministry and magistracy continuing in the 1920s and 1930s, with Sir C. P. Ramaswami Iyer as leader. [14]

Contents

Per a critic's description, 'the Mylapore Clique was most powerful in the High Court and the Judiciary, but its great influence permeated the Secretariat at Fort St. George and all the Tamil District administrations. It was not without its ramifications in the more important Telugu Districts — Guntur, Kistna, Godavaris, Vizag, and Bellary.' [15] Affiliates and relatives of senior members - especially those related to the two dominant families - ascended throughout the bureaucracy, magistracy, and business communities, under a government which had come to operate on 'the celebrated principle of the best-backed'. [16] One beneficiary was Srinivasa Ramanujan, initially funded by clique member R. Ramachandra Rao, then Collector of Nellore and President of the Indian Mathematical Society, who subsequently obtained for him a well-salaried accounting clerkship in the Madras Port Trust, [17] which was succeeded by a special scholarship at the University of Madras secured by the advocacy of university vice-chancellor, Justice of the High Court, and clique leader P. R. Sundaram Iyer. [18] [lower-roman 1] [19]

Senior members routinely served as judges and justices of the High Court of Madras, as Tehsildars and district magistrates, as Ministers of the Executive Council of the Governor of Madras and the Legislative Council of Madras, in Madras Corporation, and in similar offices; in parallel, they were often honoured by the British as Companions or Knights Commander of the Order of the British Empire or of the Order of the Star of India, and/or as Knights Bachelor, with the Kaisar-i-Hind Medal, [lower-roman 2] as well as with the titles of Rai or Rao Bahadur, and of Dewan Bahadur. Members were mainstays as high as the Viceroy's Executive Council, governing all British India as it sat under the purview of their ministerial portfolios, [lower-roman 3] and sat even on the Privy Council of the United Kingdom [lower-roman 4] and as India's delegates to the League of Nations, the Round Table Conferences, and the London Economic Conference of 1933. [lower-roman 5]

The Mylapore clique and its ur-elements were of central importance in the Madras Mahajana Sabha, [3] forerunner of the Indian National Congress, which it dominated without resistance in the southern territories until 1905, [1] rendering it nearly 'moribund'. [20] Annie Besant developed close ties to the Mylapore set resulting in the exploration of Theosophy by many Mylapore elites, and, after 1910, the metamorphosis of the set's regional machines, via Theosophical Society branches into tools of nationalist mobilization, [21] eventually resulting in India's Home Rule Movement. [22] Beyond conventional politics, the Mylapore clique was also active in long-running attempts to reform of the Madras Presidency's 75,000 Hindu temples [4] as the Dharmarakshana Sabha, [23] against which British colonial administrators, increasingly wary, effectively waged a proxy war in the 1910s, although the Sabha succeeded in obtaining its selectees' appointments to the administration of the richest of the presidency's temples through the courts. [24]

Opposition came at first, haphazardly, from Triplicane Six ringleader and editor-in-chief of the Hindu, G. Subramania Iyer, [11] who was sidelined after the 1880s, and consequently from Sir C. Sankaran Nair's 'less well-placed' [25] Egmore clique, backed by S. Kasturi Ranga Iyengar, who in 1905 purchased control of The Hindu; later, from, the Justice Party; [26] [27] the Self-Respect Movement and Non-Brahmin movement, today known as the Dravidian movement are viewed by scholars as a reaction to and against Mylapore hegemony, [28] [29] while the Mylapore-Egmore rivalry proved crucial to the formation of the mature Indian National Congress. [3] Along with the neutral (though Brahminical) Triplicane Clique of Ramarao and M. O. Parthasarathy Iyengar, Mylapore and Egmore were often referred to as Madras' 'Three Inns of Court', paralleling London's Gray's Inn, Lincoln's Inn, and Middle Temple. During the Home Rule movement, Mylapore and Egmore were briefly allied, although this failed to last. The nationalists of the Salem Clique led by Rajaji wrestled with the Mylapore faction for control over the provincial congress and eventually succeeded with the Gandhian line of engagement. [30] [31]

Senior members

(† denotes a generational leader)

Allies or subordinate members

See also

Notes

  1. On his return from England, sickened with tuberculosis, Ramanujan was treated by the medical specialist P. S. Chandrasekhara Iyer, brother of clique leader Sir P. S. Sivaswami Iyer.
  2. Justice V. Krishnaswamy Iyer; Dewan Bahadur Justice C.V. Viswanatha Sastri
  3. e.g. Sir C.P. Ramaswami Iyer, Sir P.S. Sivaswamy Iyer
  4. V.S. Srinivasa Sastri, also created a Companion of Honour
  5. Sir C.P. Ramaswami Iyer, Sir P.S. Sivaswami Iyer

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidency College, Chennai</span> College in the city of Chennai in Tamil Nadu, India

Presidency College is an art, commerce, and science college in the city of Chennai in Tamil Nadu, India. On 16 October 1840, this school was established as the Madras Preparatory School before being repurposed as a high school, and then a graduate college. The Presidency College is one of the oldest government arts colleges in India. It is one of two Presidency Colleges established by the British in India, the other being the Presidency College, Kolkata.

The three Round Table Conferences of 1930–1932 were a series of peace conferences organized by the British Government and Indian political personalities to discuss constitutional reforms in India. These started in November 1930 and ended in December 1932. They were conducted as per the recommendation of Muhammad Ali Jinnah to Viceroy Lord Irwin and Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald, and by the report submitted by the Simon Commission in May 1930. Demands for Swaraj or self-rule in India had been growing increasingly strong. B. R. Ambedkar, Jinnah, Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru, V. S. Srinivasa Sastri, Sir Muhammad Zafrulla Khan, K. T. Paul and Mirabehn were key participants from India. By the 1930s, many British politicians believed that India needed to move towards dominion status. However, there were significant disagreements between the Indian and the British political parties that the Conferences would not resolve. The key topic was about constitution and India which was mainly discussed in that conference. There were three Round Table Conferences from 1930 to 1932.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. P. Ramaswami Iyer</span> Indian lawyer and politician (1879–1966)

Dewan Bahadur Sachivottama SirChetput Pattabhiraman Ramaswami IyerLL.D. D.Litt., popularly known as Sir C. P., was an Indian lawyer, administrator and statesman, acknowledged as the most powerful man in the Madras Presidency in the decades immediately prior to Indian Independence.

The Justice Party, officially the South Indian Liberal Federation, was a political party in the Madras Presidency of British India. It was established on 20 November 1916 in Victoria Public Hall in Madras by Dr C. Natesa Mudaliar and co-founded by T. M. Nair, P. Theagaraya Chetty and Alamelu Mangai Thayarammal as a result of a series of non-Brahmin conferences and meetings in the presidency. Communal division between Brahmins and non-Brahmins began in the presidency during the late-19th and early-20th century, mainly due to caste prejudices and disproportionate Brahminical representation in government jobs. The Justice Party's foundation marked the culmination of several efforts to establish an organisation to represent the non-Brahmins in Madras and is seen as the start of the Dravidian Movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">S. Srinivasa Iyengar</span>

Seshadri Srinivasa Iyengar CIE, also seen as Sreenivasa Iyengar and Srinivasa Ayyangar, was an Indian lawyer, freedom-fighter and politician from the Indian National Congress. Iyengar was the Advocate-General of Madras Presidency from 1916 to 1920. He also served as a member of the bar council from 1912 to 1920, the law member of Madras Presidency from 1916 to 1920 and as the president of the madras province Swarajya Party faction of the Indian National Congress from 1923 to 1930. Srinivasa Iyengar was the son-in-law of renowned lawyer and first Indian Advocate-general of Madras, Sir Vembaukum Bhashyam Aiyangar. Iyengar's followers called him Lion of the South.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mohammad Usman of Madras</span>

Khan Bahadur Sir Mohammad Usman was an Indian politician, hakim and socialite who served as the Minister of Home for the Madras Presidency in the Justice Party government of the Raja of Bobbili and as the first Indian acting Governor of Madras from 16 May 1934 to 16 August 1934. His name is often written Muhammad Usman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">S. A. Saminatha Iyer</span> Indian lawyer, landlord, politician and theosophist

Rao Bahadur S. A. Saminatha Iyer, also known as Thanjavur Saminatha Iyer, was an Indian lawyer, landlord, politician and theosophist who served as Chairman of the Tanjore municipality and a delegate to the 1885, 1886, 1887, 1889 and 1894 sessions of the Indian National Congress. He spoke against salt tax in the first session conducted in 1885 and in 1887, was a part of a 32-member team that wrote the constitution of the Congress. Christopher Baker and D. A. Washbrook describe him as the "most celebrated spokesman of the Tanjore gentry".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">S. Kasturi Ranga Iyengar</span>

S. Kasturi Ranga Iyengar was an Indian lawyer, Indian independence activist, politician and journalist who served as the managing director of The Hindu from 1 April 1905 until his death. He opposed the Mylapore clique as the leader of the Egmore clique.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. V. Runganada Sastri</span> Indian interpreter, jurist, civil servant and polyglot

The Right Hon. Calamur ViravalliRunganada Sastri was an Indian interpreter, jurist, civil servant, polyglot, and social reformer, who was known for his mastery over Indian and foreign languages alike in both classical and vernacular forms, as well as his general erudition and command of jurisprudence. At his death, he is known to have mastered fourteen languages, and had a conversational command of at least two to four more.

The Indian independence movement had a long history in the Tamil-speaking districts of the then Madras Presidency going back to the 18th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">R. Ramachandra Rao</span>

Diwan Bahadur Raghunatha Rao Ramachandra Rao was an Indian civil servant, mathematician and social and political activist who served as District Collector in British India. He was a member of the Mylapore clique.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. V. Kumaraswami Sastri</span> Indian jurist, statesman and Sanskrit scholar

Diwan BahadurSir Calamur Viravalli Kumaraswami SastriKt. was an Indian jurist, statesman, and Sanskrit scholar who was leader of the Madras Bar as a Vakil of the High Court, before being appointed as a puisne justice of the Madras High Court in 1914, and, later, Chief Justice of the Madras High Court. He also served on numerous special committees; most notoriously, the Rowlatt Committee - service on which nearly imperiled his later service as Chief Justice. The great-grandson, great-great-grandson, and great-great-great-grandson of celebrated Sanskritists, he himself was noted for achieving "brilliant success, with speed" from his first days practicing law. In his heyday, he was considered "the most brilliant representative of the Madras Judicial Service", and the successor to V. Bhashyam Aiyangar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. R. Pattabhiraman</span> Indian lawyer and politician (1906–2001)

Chetput Ramaswami Iyer Pattabhiraman was an Indian lawyer and politician from the Indian National Congress. He was the eldest son of Indian statesman C. P. Ramaswami Iyer. He served as a Member of Indian Parliament from Kumbakonam from 1957 to 1967 and as a Union Minister from 1966 to 1967.

Dewan BahadurCalamur Viravalli Viswanatha Sastri was an Indian jurist and statesman who served as a justice of the High Court of the Madras Presidency, following and alongside his elder brother Dewan Bahadur Sir C. V. Kumaraswami Sastri. He was awarded the Kaisar-i-Hind Medal in 1934.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vembaukum family</span>

The Vembaukum or Vembakkam family were one of the two preeminent Brahmin dynasties in the Madras Presidency, dominating the Mylapore clique alongside the Calamur clan, and 'possess(ing) an enormous presence in the... bureaucracy of the capital and its surrounding district(s)', whose historical presence began in the 1820s, with the sprawling clan famously having begun holding yearly family conferences by the 1890s to preserve their dynastic unity, political cohesion and influence, and wealth.

The Egmore group, also faction, clique, or set, was a faction in the Madras Presidency which emerged as opposition to the hegemony of the Mylapore clique, crystallizing around the leadership of C. Sankaran Nair — one of the first non-Brahmins to achieve high office in British India. S. Kasturi Ranga Iyengar, editor-owner of The Hindu, was another crucial early ‘Egmorean’, as was C. Rajagopalachari, who ultimately ousted the Egmore group from the position of power it had achieved in the Indian National Congress, the origins of which substantially lie in the Mylapore-Egmore rivalry. Additional pivotal figures in the early Egmore faction were T. Rangachari, C. Vijayaraghavachariar, and T. M. Nair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. R. Pattabhirama Iyer</span> Indian lawyer and jurist

Chetpet Ramaswamy Pattabhirama Iyer, surname alternately spelt Aiyar, originally surnamed Dikshitar, was an Indian lawyer and jurist, noted for having led the Tanjore Bar and served as the Tanjore public prosecutor, before relocating to the city of Madras, whereupon he ultimately became a Vakil of the High Court of Madras, central member of the Mylapore clique, and a leader of the Madras bar, along with M. O. Parthasarathy Iyengar, V. Krishnaswamy Iyer, P. R. Sundaram Iyer, Sir V. C. Desikachariar, and Sir C. Sankaran Nair, immediately behind Sir V. Bhashyam Aiyangar and Sir S. Subramania Iyer, from 1891.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">V. N. Viswanatha Rao</span>

Diwan Bahadur RayaVallur Nott Viswanatha Rao was an Indian civil servant and statesman who served as Finance Secretary, Law Secretary, and Education Secretary of the Madras Presidency, as well as in the Legislative Council of Madras, and as Collector of Tinnevelly, and of Tanjore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Calamur</span>

The Calamur Viravalli family, inclusive of closely intermarried "merged" lines was one of the two preeminent Brahmin dynasties in the Madras Presidency who dominated the Mylapore clique, alongside the Vembaukum family. They were originally Vadama Iyers from Kalambur and nearby hamlets in North Arcot, who traced their ancestry to Appayya Dikshita, and before that, Deshastha movements from the North. They were traditionally by hereditary profession renowned Sanskritists, as with Anantharama, father of patriarch C. V. Runganada Sastri, Anantharama's father, and Anantharama's father's father, but rapidly adapted to the practice and administration of law and English-style governance, with many Calamurs coming to rank among India's most celebrated lawyers, jurists, administrators, and statesmen.

Dewan Bahadur Sir Mocharla Ramachandra Rao Pantulu GaruKaisar-i-Hind Medal, 1st Class was an Indian freedom fighter and statesman who was president of the 4th Andhra Mahasabha and represented the Godavari, Kistna, and Guntur districts in the Legislative Council of Madras. He was allied with the Mylapore group, and known as the 'Gokhale of South India' after a famous description of V. S. Srinivasa Sastri.

References

  1. 1 2 Stein, Burton (2010-02-04). A History of India. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-4443-2351-1.
  2. Cambridge South Asian Studies. 1965. ISBN   978-0-521-20755-3.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Sarkar, Sumit (1989-01-24). Modern India 1885–1947. Springer. ISBN   978-1-349-19712-5.
  4. 1 2 Baker, Christopher (1975), Baker, C. J.; Washbrook, D. A. (eds.), "Temples and Political Development", South India: Political Institutions and Political Change 1880–1940, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 69–97, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02746-0_3, ISBN   978-1-349-02746-0 , retrieved 2024-03-26
  5. Sundararajan, Saroja (1989). March to Freedom in Madras Presidency, 1916-1947. University of Michigan Press (original); Lalitha Publications.
  6. 1 2 3 Kannan, R. (2017-06-13). Anna: The Life and Times of C.N. Annadurai. Penguin UK. ISBN   978-81-8475-313-4.
  7. Sundararajan, Saroja (1989). March to Freedom in Madras Presidency, 1916-1947. Lalitha Publications.
  8. Washbrook, David (1975), Baker, C. J.; Washbrook, D. A. (eds.), "Political Change in a Stable Society: Tanjore District 1880 to 1920", South India: Political Institutions and Political Change 1880–1940, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 20–68, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02746-0_2, ISBN   978-1-349-02746-0 , retrieved 2024-03-27
  9. Ganesan, A. (1988-01-01). The Press in Tamil Nadu and the Struggle for Freedom, 1917-1937. Mittal Publications. ISBN   978-81-7099-082-6.
  10. Washbrook, D. A. (1976-07-29). The Emergence of Provincial Politics. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563430. ISBN   978-0-521-20982-3.
  11. 1 2 Sarkar, Sumit (1989-01-24). Modern India 1885–1947. Springer. ISBN   978-1-349-19712-5.
  12. Sundararajan, Saroja (1997). Madras Presidency in Pre-Gandhian Era: A Historical Perspective, 1884-1915. Lalitha Publications.
  13. Vēṇu, Ē Es (1987). Anna and the Crusade. Nakkeeran Pathippagam.
  14. Studdert-Kennedy, Gerald (1998-11-24). Providence and the Raj: Imperial Mission and Missionary Imperialism. SAGE Publications. ISBN   978-0-7619-9277-6.
  15. Irschick, Eugene F. Politics and Social Conflict in South India. University of California Press.
  16. Studies, University of London Centre of South Asian (1977). Leadership in South Asia. Vikas Publishing House. ISBN   978-0-7069-0540-3.
  17. Aiyangar, Srinivasa Ramanujan (1995-09-07). Ramanujan: Letters and Commentary. American Mathematical Soc. ISBN   978-0-8218-9125-4.
  18. Kanigel, Robert (2016-04-26). The Man Who Knew Infinity: A Life of the Genius Ramanujan. Simon and Schuster. ISBN   978-1-4767-6349-1.
  19. Rajagopalan, K. R. (1988). Srinivasa Ramanujan. Sri Aravinda-Bharati.
  20. Knight, Lionel Charles (2012). Britain in India: 1858 - 1947. Anthem perspectives in history. London: Anthem. ISBN   978-0-85728-517-1.
  21. Prakash, Gyan (2020-06-16). Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-21421-4.
  22. Sundararajan, Saroja (2002). Sir C.P. Ramaswami Aiyar, a Biography. Allied Publishers. ISBN   978-81-7764-326-8.
  23. Gould, William (2020-01-30), "Social and Religious Reform in 19th-Century India", Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History, doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.382, ISBN   978-0-19-027772-7 , retrieved 2024-03-26
  24. Rajaraman, P. (1988). The Justice Party: A Historical Perspective, 1916-37. Poompozhil Publishers.
  25. History and Archaeology. University of Michigan Press (original); Department of Ancient History, Culture, and Archaeology, University of Allahabad. 1980.
  26. Washbrook, David (1975), Baker, C. J.; Washbrook, D. A. (eds.), "The Development of Caste Organisation in South India 1880 to 1925", South India: Political Institutions and Political Change 1880–1940, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 150–203, doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02746-0_5, ISBN   978-1-349-02746-0 , retrieved 2024-03-27
  27. Venkatraman, V. (2019). "March To Freedom: Indian Press and Public Opinion Towards Indian Independence in Madras Presidency 1942-1947". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3437197. ISSN   1556-5068.
  28. Veluchamy, C. "Political Trends and Dawn of the Justice Party Volume : III, Issue : III, April - 2013". oldisrj.lbp.world. Lakshmi Book Publication. doi:10.9780/22307850 (inactive 2024-04-26). Retrieved 2024-03-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of April 2024 (link)
  29. Torri, Michelguglielmo (1977). Washbrook, D. A. (ed.). "Social System and Ideology in South India". Economic and Political Weekly. 12 (29): 1144–1148. ISSN   0012-9976. JSTOR   4365773.
  30. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/madras-was-where-idea-of-congress-was-born/articleshow/33976753.cms
  31. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/the-mylapore-building-and-the-birth-of-indian-national-congress/article67349879.ece