NATO Double-Track Decision

Last updated
Protest in Bonn against the nuclear arms race between the NATO and the Warsaw Pact, 1981 Massale vredesdemonstratie in Bonn tegen de modernisering van kernwapens in West, Bestanddeelnr 253-8611.jpg
Protest in Bonn against the nuclear arms race between the NATO and the Warsaw Pact, 1981

The NATO Double-Track Decision was the decision by NATO from December 12, 1979, to offer the Warsaw Pact a mutual limitation of medium-range ballistic missiles and intermediate-range ballistic missiles. [1] It was combined with a threat by NATO to deploy more medium-range nuclear weapons in Western Europe after the Euromissile Crisis. [2]

Contents

Background

The détente between the United States and the Soviet Union culminated in the signing of SALT I and Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (1972) and the negotiations toward SALT II (1979). Through these agreements, the two countries agreed to freeze the number of strategic ballistic missile launchers at existing levels, reduce the number of anti-ballistic missiles and not build more ground-based launchers.

Along with the 1973 Agreement on the Prevention of Nuclear War these arms control measures caused European NATO members, especially West Germany to feel overlooked. [3] On 28 October 1977, Chancellor Helmut Schmidt gave a speech at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London in which he condemned the threat posed to Western Europe by the SS-20 missiles being deployed by the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe earlier that year and publicly expressed a European concern that the strategic nuclear parity reduced the credibility of the American nuclear guarantee and exacerbated the military imbalance within Europe. [4] [5] [6] [7] The road-mobile SS-20 missile was capable of carrying up to three MIRV warheads and was more accurate than the previously deployed SS-4 and SS-5 missiles. [8]

The strategic nuclear parity between the United States and Soviet Union achieved through the SALT I, ABM and SALT II arms control agreements and development of new intermediate-range nuclear by the Soviet Union led to fears of "decoupling" among non-nuclear European NATO members. [4] According to Noel D. Cary, "unless America was unswervingly prepared to risk the sacrifice of one of its cities to save a German one, West Germany might be vulnerable to Soviet political blackmail." [9]

NATO Double-Track Decision

SS-20 and Pershing II missiles, National Air and Space Museum National Air and Space Museum - Pershing II and SS-20.png
SS-20 and Pershing II missiles, National Air and Space Museum

The decision was prompted by the continuing military buildup of Warsaw Pact countries, particularly their growing capability in nuclear systems threatening Western Europe. European NATO members were especially concerned about the growth of long-range theatre nuclear forces (LRTNF) such as the SS-20 and Tupolev Tu-22M 'Backfire' bomber. [10] [11]

On 12 December 1979, at a special meeting of NATO Foreign and Defence Ministers in Brussels, the so-called NATO Double-Track Decision was adopted. The ministers resolved to modernise NATO's LRTNF by deploying 108 Pershing II launchers to replace the existing American Pershing 1a missiles and an additional 464 BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missiles (GLCMs) ("track two") [10] [11] [12] if negotiations for reciprocal limits ("track one") failed by the fall of 1983. [13] NATO offered immediate negotiations with the goal to ban nuclear armed middle-range missiles from Europe completely, with the provision that the missiles could be installed four years later if the negotiations failed.

The Soviet Union was critical of the fact that neither French nor British nuclear weapons had been considered in the arms control negotiations. [14]

Protests

Soon after the NATO Double Track Decision opposition started to mount. In November 1980, German Green Party politician Gert Bastian and footballer Josef Weber drafted the Krefeld appeal calling for the federal government of West Germany to retract its support for the deployment of Pershing II missiles in the country and GLCMs across Europe. The Krefeld appeal also called upon West Germany to oppose a nuclear arms race, emphasizing that the nuclear armament of the two Cold War superpowers is endangering Europeans in particular. By 1983 the Krefeld appeal had gained five million signatures and opposition to the NATO Double Track Decision became a minimal consensus for the peace movement. [15]

"Track One" negotiations

The Soviet Union and United States agreed to open negotiations and preliminary discussions, named the Preliminary Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Talks, [16] which began in Geneva, Switzerland, in October 1980. The relations were strained at the time due to the December 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan which led America to impose sanctions against the USSR. [17] Formal talks began on 30 November 1981, with the US negotiators led by President Ronald Reagan and those of the Soviet Union by General Secretary, Leonid Brezhnev. The core of the US negotiating position reflected the principles put forth during the Presidency of Jimmy Carter: any limits placed on US intermediate-range capabilities, both in terms of "ceilings" and "rights", must be reciprocated with limits on Soviet systems. Additionally, the US insisted that a sufficient verification regime be put in place. [18]

Between 1981 and 1983, American and Soviet negotiators gathered for six rounds of talks, each two months in length—a system based on the earlier SALT talks. [19] [20] The US delegation was composed of Paul Nitze, Major General William F. Burns of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Thomas Graham of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), and officials from the US Department of State, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and US National Security Council. [21] [22] In the fall of 1983, just ahead of the scheduled deployment of US Pershing IIs and GLCMs, the United States lowered its proposed limit on global INF deployments to 420 missiles, while the Soviet Union proposed "equal reductions": if the US cancelled the planned deployment of Pershing II and GLCM systems, the Soviet Union would reduce its own INF deployment by 572 warheads. [23] [24] [25] In November 1983, after the first Pershing IIs arrived in West Germany, the Soviet Union ended negotiations. [26] [27] [28]

Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty

On 8 December 1987 the United States and the Soviet Union signed the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. This treaty reverted the double-track policy. [29] This treaty also provided for the destruction of all middle-range weapons and ended this episode of the Cold War.

"Track Two" deployments

Pershing II

The Pershing II launchers began to be deployed in West Germany in late November 1983 and the deployment of 108 launchers was completed in late 1985. [30] Initial Operational Status (IOS) was achieved on 15 December 1983 when A Battery, 1st Battalion, 41st Field Artillery Regiment rotated onto operational status at the Missile Storage Area (MSA) in Mutlangen. The West German government announced on 13 December 1985 that the US Army 56th Field Artillery Brigade was equipped with 108 Pershing II launchers across three missile battalions stationed at Neu-Ulm, Mutlangen and Neckarsulm. [31] [32]

BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missile

464 BGM-109G missiles would be based at six locations throughout Europe: 160 at RAF Greenham Common and RAF Molesworth in the United Kingdom, 112 at Comiso Air Station in Italy, [33] [34] [35] 96 at Wueschheim Air Station in West Germany, [36] 48 at the Woensdrecht Air Base in the Netherlands, [37] [38] and 48 at the Florennes Air Base in Belgium. [38] [39] [40] [41]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty</span> US-Soviet/Russian treaty (1987–2019)

The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty was an arms control treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union. US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev signed the treaty on 8 December 1987. The US Senate approved the treaty on 27 May 1988, and Reagan and Gorbachev ratified it on 1 June 1988.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RSD-10 Pioneer</span> Intermediate-range ballistic missile

The RSD-10 Pioneer was an intermediate-range ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead, deployed by the Soviet Union from 1976 to 1988. It carried GRAU designation 15Ж45 (15Zh45). Its NATO reporting name was SS-20 Saber.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harold Brown (Secretary of Defense)</span> American nuclear physicist and U.S. Secretary of Defense

Harold Brown was an American nuclear physicist who served as United States Secretary of Defense from 1977 to 1981, under President Jimmy Carter. Previously, in the John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson administrations, he held the posts of Director of Defense Research and Engineering (1961–1965) and United States Secretary of the Air Force (1965–1969).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China and weapons of mass destruction</span>

The People's Republic of China has developed and possesses weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and nuclear weapons. The first of China's nuclear weapons tests took place in 1964, and its first hydrogen bomb test occurred in 1966 at Lop Nur. Tests continued until 1996, when the country signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), but did not ratify it. China acceded to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) in 1984 and ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) in 1997.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Submarine-launched cruise missile</span> Seaborne weapon

A submarine-launched cruise missile (SLCM) is a cruise missile that is launched from a submarine. Current versions are typically standoff weapons known as land-attack cruise missiles (LACMs), which are used to attack predetermined land targets with conventional or nuclear payloads. Anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs) are also used, and some submarine-launched cruise missiles have variants for both functions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States European Command</span> Unified combatant command of the United States Armed Forces responsible for the European region

The United States European Command (EUCOM) is one of the eleven unified combatant commands of the United States military, headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany. Its area of focus covers 21,000,000 square miles (54,000,000 km2) and 51 countries and territories, including Europe, The Caucasus, Russia and Greenland. The Commander of the United States EUCOM simultaneously serves as the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe (SACEUR) within NATO, a military alliance. During the Gulf War and Operation Northern Watch, EUCOM controlled the forces flying from Incirlik Air Base.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear sharing</span> Concept in NATOs nuclear deterrence policy

Nuclear sharing is a concept in NATO's policy of nuclear deterrence, which allows member countries without nuclear weapons of their own to participate in the planning for the use of nuclear weapons by NATO. In particular, it provides for involvement of the armed forces of those countries in delivering nuclear weapons in the event of their use.

Able Archer 83 was a military exercise conducted by NATO that took place in November 1983. It simulated a period of heightened nuclear tensions between NATO and the Warsaw Pact, leading to concerns that it could have been mistaken for a real attack by the Soviet Union. The exercise is considered by some to be one of the closest moments the world came to nuclear war during the Cold War. It was the annual Able Archer exercise conducted in November 1983. The purpose of the exercise, like previous years, was to simulate a period of conflict escalation, culminating in the US military attaining a simulated DEFCON 1 coordinated nuclear attack. The five-day exercise, which involved NATO commands throughout Western Europe, was coordinated from the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) headquarters in Casteau, Belgium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TR-1 Temp</span> Theatre ballistic missile

The TR-1 Temp was a mobile theatre ballistic missile developed and deployed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. It was assigned the NATO reporting name SS-12 Scaleboard and carried the industrial designation 9M76 and the GRAU index 9К76. A modified version was initially identified by NATO as a new design and given the SS-22 reporting name, but later recognized it as merely a variant of the original and maintained the name Scaleboard. The Temp entered service in the mid-1960s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missile</span> Long-range, all-weather, subsonic tactical/strategic cruise missile

The Ground Launched Cruise Missile, or GLCM, was a ground-launched cruise missile developed by the United States Air Force in the last decade of the Cold War and disarmed under the INF Treaty.

START III was a proposed bilateral arms control treaty between the United States and Russia that was meant to reduce the deployed nuclear weapons arsenals of both countries drastically and to continue the weapons reduction efforts that had taken place in the START I and START II negotiations. The framework for negotiations of the treaty began with talks in Helsinki between US President Bill Clinton and Russian President Boris Yeltsin in 1997. However, negotiations broke down, and the treaty was never signed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cold War (1979–1985)</span> Phase of the Cold War during 1979–1985

The Cold War from 1979 to 1985 was a late phase of the Cold War marked by a sharp increase in hostility between the Soviet Union and the West. It arose from a strong denunciation of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979. With the election of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in 1979, and American President Ronald Reagan in 1980, a corresponding change in Western foreign policy approach toward the Soviet Union was marked by the rejection of détente in favor of the Reagan Doctrine policy of rollback, with the stated goal of dissolving Soviet influence in Soviet Bloc countries. During this time, the threat of nuclear war had reached new heights not seen since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">38th Combat Support Wing</span> Military unit

The 38th Combat Support Wing is an inactive wing of the United States Air Force. Its last assignment was with Third Air Force at Ramstein Air Base, Germany from 2004 until 2007. The mission of the wing was to enhance support to Third Air Force's geographically separated units.

On 26 September 1983, during the Cold War, the Soviet nuclear early warning system Oko reported the launch of one intercontinental ballistic missile with four more missiles behind it, from the United States. These missile attack warnings were suspected to be false alarms by Stanislav Petrov, an engineer of the Soviet Air Defence Forces on duty at the command center of the early-warning system. He decided to wait for corroborating evidence—of which none arrived—rather than immediately relaying the warning up the chain of command. This decision is seen as having prevented a retaliatory nuclear strike against the United States and its NATO allies, which would likely have resulted in a full-scale nuclear war. Investigation of the satellite warning system later determined that the system had indeed malfunctioned.

This Pershing missile bibliography is a list of works related to the Pershing 1 and Pershing 1a Field Artillery Missile Systems and the Pershing II Weapon System.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RK-55</span> Russian surface and submarine-launched nuclear cruise missile

The Novator RK-55 Relief is a Russian Navy cruise missile that is launched either from submarines (SLCM) or from surface ships. It can have a nuclear warhead developed in the Soviet Union. A version launched from submarine torpedo tubes, the S-10 Granat, has apparently been converted to carry conventional warheads and continues in service to this day. The Russian Federation was reported to have deployed the derivative SS-CX-7/SS-CX-8 systems on 14 February 2017. The land launched version is called the Novator 9M729.

This timeline of nuclear weapons development is a chronological catalog of the evolution of nuclear weapons rooting from the development of the science surrounding nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. In addition to the scientific advancements, this timeline also includes several political events relating to the development of nuclear weapons. The availability of intelligence on recent advancements in nuclear weapons of several major countries is limited because of the classification of technical knowledge of nuclear weapons development.

The "Zero Option" was the name given to an American proposal for the withdrawal of all Soviet and United States intermediate-range nuclear missiles from Europe. This term was subsequently expanded to describe the vision of eliminating all nuclear weapons everywhere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pershing II</span> American ballistic missile

The Pershing II Weapon System was a solid-fueled two-stage medium-range ballistic missile designed and built by Martin Marietta to replace the Pershing 1a Field Artillery Missile System as the United States Army's primary nuclear-capable theater-level weapon. The U.S. Army replaced the Pershing 1a with the Pershing II Weapon System in 1983, while the German Air Force retained Pershing 1a until all Pershings were eliminated in 1991. The U.S. Army Missile Command (MICOM) managed the development and improvements, while the Field Artillery Branch deployed the systems and developed tactical doctrine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kh-80</span> Supersonic cruise missile

The Kh-80 Meteorit-A, the RK-75 Meteorit-N(GRAU:3M25N, NATO:SS-NX-24 Scorpion) and the P-750 Meteorit-M was a Soviet cruise missile which was supposed to replace subsonic intermediate range missiles in Soviet inventory.

References

  1. Trakimavicius, Lukas. "NATO at 70: Lessons from the Cold War". Atlantic Council. Retrieved 2021-12-02.
  2. "Thirtieth Anniversary of NATO's Dual-Track Decision". nsarchive2.gwu.edu.
  3. Heuser, Beatrice (12 December 1997). NATO, Britain, France and the FRG. Nuclear Strategies and Forces for Europe, 1949–2000. Palgrave Macmillan London. p. 21. ISBN   978-0-312-17498-9.
  4. 1 2 The Euromissile Crisis and the End of the Cold War. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2015. p. 127. ISBN   978-0-8047-9286-8.
  5. Becker-Schaum, Christoph; Gassert, Philipp; Mausbach, Wilfried; Klimke, Martin; Zepp, Marianne (2016). The Nuclear Crisis: The Arms Race, Cold War Anxiety, and the German Peace Movement of the 1980s. New York: Berghahn. p. 73. ISBN   978-1785332678.
  6. Pincus, Walter (25 October 1983). "Soviets' Posture Shifts as SS20s Deployed". Washington Post . ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  7. Schmidt, Helmut (3 March 2008). "The 1977 Alastair Buchan memorial lecture". Survival. 20 (1): 2–10. doi:10.1080/00396337808441722. ISSN   0039-6338.
  8. Rose, François de (1979-06-01). "Europe and America: The Future of SALT and Western Security in Europe". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 57, no. 5. ISSN   0015-7120 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  9. Cary, Noel D. (27 March 2019). "Helmut Schmidt, Euromissiles, and the Peace Movement". Central European History. 52 (1): 148–171. doi:10.1017/S0008938919000104. ISSN   0008-9389.
  10. 1 2 "NATO Basic Documents". web.archive.org. 2009-02-27. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  11. 1 2 "NATO – Official text: Special Meeting of Foreign and Defence Ministers (The Double-Track Decision on Theatre Nuclear Forces), 12 Dec. 1979".
  12. Trakimavicius, Lukas. "NATO at 70: Lessons from the Cold War". Atlantic Council. Retrieved 2021-12-02.
  13. Søe, Christian (April 1995). "Jeffrey Herf. War by Other Means: Soviet Power, West German Resistance, and the Battle of the Euromissiles". The American Historical Review. 100 (2). doi:10.1086/ahr/100.2.497. ISSN   1937-5239.
  14. Drozdiak, William (20 January 1983). "Mitterrand Gives Boost to Kohl in Speech on Arms". Washington Post. Bonn. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  15. Frank Biess (2020). German Angst: Fear and Democracy in the Federal Republic of Germany. Oxford University Press. p. 315. ISBN   9780198714187.
  16. "Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces [INF] Chronology". Federation of American Scientists . Retrieved 15 August 2016.
  17. Talbott, Strobe (1979-01-01). "U.S.-Soviet Relations: From Bad to Worse". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 58, no. 3. ISSN   0015-7120 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  18. Bohlen et al. 2012, pp. 6, 9.
  19. Bohlen et al. 2012, p. 9.
  20. Hoffmann, Stanley (1981-12-01). "NATO and Nuclear Weapons: Reasons and Unreason". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 60, no. 2. ISSN   0015-7120 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  21. "Paul Nitze and A Walk in the Woods – A Failed Attempt at Arms Control". Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training. 30 March 2016. Retrieved 19 August 2016.
  22. "Nomination of William F. Burns To Be Director of the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency". Ronald Reagan Presidential Library. 7 January 1988. Retrieved 19 August 2016.
  23. Rose, Francois de (1982-09-01). "Inflexible Response". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 61, no. 1. ISSN   0015-7120 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  24. Bell, Coral (1985-02-01). "From Carter to Reagan". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 63, no. 3. ISSN   0015-7120 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  25. Adelman, Kenneth L. (1984-12-01). "Arms Control With and Without Agreements". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 63, no. 2. ISSN   0015-7120 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  26. "Mitterrand Tells West: Maintain Missiles Resolve". Washington Post. 2023-12-26. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  27. Bohlen et al. 2012, p. 10.
  28. Drozdiak, William (8 December 1983). "Soviets Halt Strategic Arms Talks". Washington Post. Geneva. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  29. Spencer C. Tucker, ed. (2020). The Cold War: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection [5 Volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 434. ISBN   9781440860768.
  30. Markham, James M. (1983-11-24). "FIRST U.S. PERSHING MISSILES DELIVERED IN WEST GERMANY". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2024-05-13.
  31. "Pershing Missiles Now All in Place". Washington Post. 2023-12-28. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2024-05-13.
  32. Pincus, Walter (15 October 1983). "Pershings Packed to Go". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  33. Gilbert, Sari (15 April 1982). "Italy Begins Cruise Missile Base Despite Left's Protest". Washington Post. Rome. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  34. Pincus, Walter (5 November 1983). "Cruise Missiles to Be Placed At Temporary Site in Sicily". Washington Post. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  35. "COMPONENTS OF THE CRUISE ARRIVE IN ITALY". The New York Times. 1983-11-28. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  36. Fisher, Marc (11 April 1990). "CRUISE MISSILE 'DRAWDOWN' BEGINS AT U.S. AIR BASE IN WEST GERMANY". Washington Post. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  37. "Agreement Between The United States Of America And The Netherlands Concerning The Stationing, Support And Operation Of The Ground Launched Cruise Missile (GLCM) System In The Territory Of The Netherlands". www.un-ilibrary.org. The Hague. 4 November 1985. doi:10.18356/085bfbf8-en-fr . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  38. 1 2 "The Verification Sites". Washington Post. 10 December 1987.
  39. "Belgium Removes Last Cruise Missile". Washington Post. 13 December 1988. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  40. Montgomery, Paul L.; Times, Special To the New York (1988-12-14). "U.S. Flies the Last Cruise Missiles Out of Belgium". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  41. Dryden, Stephen (14 March 1985). "Belgium to Deploy Cruise Missiles". Washington Post. Brussels. Retrieved 2024-05-14.

Works cited