Nature study

Last updated

The nature study movement (alternatively, Nature Study or nature-study) was a popular education movement that originated in the United States and spread throughout the English-speaking world in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. [1] Nature study attempted to reconcile scientific investigation with spiritual, personal experiences gained from interaction with the natural world. [2] Led by progressive educators and naturalists such as Anna Botsford Comstock, Liberty Hyde Bailey, Louis Agassiz, William Gould Vinal, and Wilbur S. Jackman, nature study changed the way science was taught in schools by emphasizing learning from tangible objects, something that was embodied by the movement's mantra: "study nature, not books". The movement popularized scientific study outside of the classroom as well, and has proven highly influential for figures involved in the modern environmental movement, such as Aldo Leopold and Rachel Carson. [3]

Contents

Background

By the mid-19th century, a growing concern for the state of the environment began to take shape. In 1864, American diplomat George Perkins Marsh published the groundbreaking book Man and Nature . Highlighting people's responsibility to the natural world, the work marked the beginning of the conservation movement. [4]

Before the 1890s, the idea of nature study existed, but the "efforts had been sporadic and piecemeal". [5] Naturalist Louis Agassiz wanted to capture "learners in studying the natural world". His students, who were influenced by this philosophy, went on to provide the nature study knowledge in public schools. [6] It was Agassiz who coined the phrase, "Study nature, not books." [6]

Definitions

Nature study can be described as "conceiving of the movement as a loose coalition of communities composed of individuals, societies, and institutions able to find some common ground in the study and appreciation of the natural world". [7] In "Leaflet I: What Is Nature-Study?" from a 1904 collection nature study lessons, Liberty Hyde Bailey presented the following description of nature study:

NATURE-STUDY, as a process, is seeing the things that one looks at, and the drawing of proper conclusions from what one sees. Its purpose is to educate the child in terms of his environment, to the end that his life may be fuller and richer. Nature-study is not the study of a science, as of botany, entomology, geology, and the like. That is, it takes the things at hand and endeavors to understand them, without reference primarily to the systematic order or relationships of objects. It is informal, as are the objects which one sees. It is entirely divorced from mere definitions, or from formal explanations in books. It is therefore supremely natural. It trains the eye and the mind to see and to comprehend the common things of life; and the result is not directly the acquiring of science but the establishing of a living sympathy with everything that is.

Anna Comstock defined the idea extensively in her book, Handbook of Nature Study: "Nature Study is for the comprehension of the Individual life of the bird, insect or plant that is nearest at hand." [8] Comstock continued that nature study aided "both discernment and in expression of things as they are". [9] The movement came at a time when society was concerned with the future of the next generation [10] and with nature conservation itself, [11] and because of this was met with high regard and high expectations. [10] Though many efforts had come before 1890 by some naturalists and scientists to teach and expand the movement, the nature-study movement really did not gain momentum with the public until the late 19th century. [10] By 1925, the subject had found a place in the curriculum of almost every school district in the United States. [12]

"Study nature, not books"

Many scientists, teachers, and leaders throughout the United States agreed on the value of nature study, and the subject became an important part of how the natural world was examined in many areas of the country by the early 20th century. [13] Scientists gave public support to the philosophy and added to the creation of a curriculum and courses. [5] The movement was particularly popular in the Northeast, the West, and the Midwest. The South also found some use for the idea of natural science in their agriculture schools, as well as at Tuskegee Institute in Alabama (now Tuskegee University) and Hampton Institute in Virginia (now Hampton University). [14] Nature Study could be found in both urbanized, highly populated cities and in rural school systems because of the involvement of scientists in designing and implementing curriculum. [15] For example, Wilbur Jackman created an outline of nature study with "life and its phenomena" which examined how the study of plants and animals would consist of zoology and botany (under biology), physics, chemistry, meteorology, astronomy, geography, geology, and mineralogy. [16]

Lucretia Crocker along with women's clubs and other help in the Boston area, created a "Teachers' School of Science" in Back Bay at the New Museum of the Boston society. Along with an Ellen Swallow Richards, Crocker created a mineralogy course for teachers. Teacher found such education in the Boston area because of area scientist that would teach their courses. [17]

The American Nature Study Society was founded in 1908, and still exists today. [18] The society was an important aspect as well in helping to bring about the Nature-Study movement. Anna Botsford Comstock is one of the society' past presidents. It is considered to be America's oldest organization for environment. [19]

Anna Botsford Comstock studied and worked as the head of the Department of Nature Study at Cornell University with her husband, John Henry Comstock. [20] Cornell University was considered to be a major hub for the Nature Study movement. She wrote the Handbook of Nature Study, which includes sections on how to teach the subject and how to teach the courses to children, and also includes sections from different species of animals and plants to even the skies.

George Washington Carver was also a noted advocate of nature study. [21] Carver encouraged teachers to introduce nature study as early as possible, encouraging them to start with "the wee tots, the kindergarteners", and encouraged cross-curricular connections in addition to agricultural connections. [22] Carver published a series of materials on nature study from 1897 until at least 1910 to encourage schools to integrate hands-on and outdoor education. [23] Carver particularly advocated for building gardens at schools, and for simplifying some broad academic concepts like mutualism and other ecological interactions into the "language of the masses". [24] This work to increase access to and familiarity with nature in schools has been cited by some as proof of Carver's early work in environmental justice. [25]

Education for children

Sciences were expanding in colleges and universities, and scientists felt "that students needed more and better preparation in secondary and primary schools". [26] Not only was the curriculum of schools evolving, but also was the system of education itself. Populations were rising in big urban areas like New York and Chicago, and there was legislation to require students to spend required numbers of hours and days per year in the school system. [26] With a growing population due to immigration and other reasons, young people could be taught useful skills for life and academia in order to "share fundamental civic values and enlarged view of their world". [27] The nature study became the way younger students learned of their natural world. [28] This also came at a time when legislation was being passed for conservation in the country, which helped gather support from parents and educators in the country. [18]

Anna Botsford Comstock, stated in her book Handbook of Nature Study, "nature-study cultivates the child's imagination, since there are so many wonderful and true stories that he may read with his own eyes, which affect his imagination as much as does fairy lore, at the same time nature study cultivates in him a perception and a regard for what is true, and the power to express it...Nature study gives the child practical and helpful knowledge. It makes him familiar with nature's ways and forces, so that he is not so helpless in the presence of natural misfortune and disasters." [9] Comstock also felt that the nature study did not begin with books, but through the observations of life and form from the first naturalists. [29] The point of the system being to "give pupils an outlook over all the forms of life and their relation one to another". [8]

Because of the importance placed on the new generation, the surrounding public watched the schools carefully with high expectations of the students in the late 19th century. [30]

A study in Kim Tolley's the Science Education of American Girls showed that of 127 public school systems, 49% offered Nature-study in all grades, 25% offered in at least six grades, 11% in at least four grades, 5% in three grades or lower, and 10% did not offer it at all in 1925. [31]

Women in the movement

Women played many roles in this movement within American society. Some were able to find supervisory jobs, or jobs as professor in natural history at school districts, or institutions of higher learning. Some women helped to create the movement itself, like Anna Botsford Comstock, and also teachers were able to "[implement] nature study to varying degrees in their classrooms and occasionally modified the curriculum created by male professionals so that it favored the life sciences". [18]

Over the four years from 1915–16 to 1919–20 in the state of Wisconsin, the percentage of women high school biology teachers increased from 50% to 67%. The number of women physics teachers increased from 3% in 1915–16 to 7% in 1919–20. [32]

The nature study movement gave a new outlook to the education of young women in the United States. In the later 20th century, opinions started to change about the movement, and it declined. Some male critics saw it as "romantic" or "sentimental". This created a gender issue that was forcibly imposed on the nature-study movement. [7] By the beginning of the 20th century, many young women were attracted to the natural history movement. [33]

The Science Education of American Girls by Kim Tolley gives an explanation of high schools in America for females. "Higher schools for females served as important centers for the dissemination of the nineteenth-century ideology of separate spheres, institutions commonly located in small towns and in rural, rather than urban, areas. The ideology prevailed in antebellum southern institutions serving elite girls who never expected to work for wages outside the home, in northern schools that explicitly south to prepare teachers for the nation's growing common schools, and in Catholic academies on the western front." [34]

Others, such as Susanna Moodie, and her daughter Agnes Chamberlin who made nature studies to support her family, and Catharine Parr Traill investigated nature to describe the new territories where they found themselves in nineteenth century Canada. [35]

See also

Notes

  1. Kass, Dorothy (2018). Educational Reform and Environmental Concern: A History of School Nature Study in Australia. New York: Routledge. ISBN   978-1-315-62525-6.
  2. Jenkins, E. W. (1981). "Science, Sentimentalism, or Social Control? The Nature Study Movement in England and Wales, 1899-1914". History of Education. 10 (1): 33–43. doi:10.1080/0046760810100104.
  3. Armitage, p. 13
  4. Krech, p. 441
  5. 1 2 Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 327
  6. 1 2 Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 325
  7. 1 2 Tolley, p. 128
  8. 1 2 Comstock, p. 5
  9. 1 2 Comstock, p. 1
  10. 1 2 3 Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", pp. ?-?
  11. Tolley, Kim (2003). The Science Education of American Girls: A Historical Perspective. New York: Routledge. p. 129. ISBN   0-415-93473-7.
  12. Tolley, Kim (2003). The Science Education of American Girls: A Historical Perspective. New York: Routledge0-415-93473-7. p. 127.
  13. Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 324
  14. Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", pp. 351–352
  15. Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 326
  16. Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 334
  17. Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 328
  18. 1 2 3 Tolley, p. 129
  19. The American Nature Study Society. EnviroLink Network. Retrieved on June 9, 2010.
  20. Herrick and Smith, caption of p. 18
  21. "George Washington Carver|Carver's Nature Study Bulletins · Rural Schools|NAL|USDA". www.nal.usda.gov. Retrieved 2024-02-14.
  22. Kremer, Gary (2011). George Washington Carver: A Biography. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood. p. 69. ISBN   9780313347962.
  23. D’Mura, Claire. "Research Guides: School Garden Movement: Primary and Secondary Resources: George Washington Carver and Nature Study". guides.loc.gov. Retrieved 2024-02-14.
  24. Harbster, Jennifer (2015-03-02). "George Washington Carver and Nature Study | Inside Adams". The Library of Congress. Retrieved 2024-02-14.
  25. Perillo, Rick (2021-02-25). "The Buried Environmental Justice of George Washington Carver". Medium. Retrieved 2024-02-14.
  26. 1 2 Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 329
  27. Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 331
  28. Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 351
  29. Comstock, p. 5–6
  30. Kohlstedt, "Nature, Not Books", p. 330
  31. Tolley, p. 135
  32. Tolley, p. 121
  33. Tolley, p. 95
  34. Tolley, p. 94
  35. "Agnes Chamberlin: Chronology | Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library".

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louis Agassiz</span> Swiss-American naturalist (1807–1873)

Jean Louis Rodolphe Agassiz FRS (For) FRSE was a Swiss-born American biologist and geologist who is recognized as a scholar of Earth's natural history.

Science education is the teaching and learning of science to school children, college students, or adults within the general public. The field of science education includes work in science content, science process, some social science, and some teaching pedagogy. The standards for science education provide expectations for the development of understanding for students through the entire course of their K-12 education and beyond. The traditional subjects included in the standards are physical, life, earth, space, and human sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elizabeth Cabot Agassiz</span> American educator

Elizabeth Cabot Agassiz was an American educator, naturalist, writer, and the co-founder and first president of Radcliffe College. A researcher of natural history, she was an author and illustrator of natural history texts as well as a co-author of natural history texts with her husband, Louis Agassiz, and her stepson Alexander Agassiz.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anna Botsford Comstock</span> American artist, educator, conservationist

Anna Botsford Comstock was an acclaimed author, illustrator, and educator of natural studies. The first female professor at Cornell University, her over 900-page work, The Handbook of Nature Study (1911), is now in its 24th edition. Comstock was an American artist and wood engraver known for illustrating entomological text books with her husband, John Henry Comstock including their first joint effort, The Manual for the Study of Insects (1885). Comstock worked with Liberty Hyde Bailey, John Walton Spencer, Alice McCloskey, Julia Rogers, and Ada Georgia as part of the department of Nature Study at Cornell University. Together they wrote nature study curricula to develop a curiosity for, and education about, the surrounding natural world. Comstock also was a proponent for conservationism by instilling a love and appreciation of the natural world around us.

Archibald Fairly Carr Jr. was an American herpetologist, ecologist, and conservationist. He was a Professor of Zoology at the University of Florida and an acclaimed writer on science and nature. He brought attention to the world's declining sea turtle populations due to over-exploitation and habitat loss. Wildlife refuges in Florida and Costa Rica have been named in his honor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Henry Comstock</span> American entomologist

John Henry Comstock was an eminent researcher in entomology and arachnology and a leading educator. His work provided the basis for classification of butterflies, moths, and scale insects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outdoor education</span> Organized learning that takes place in the outdoors

Outdoor education is organized learning that takes place in the outdoors, typically during school camping trips. Outdoor education programs sometimes involve residential or journey wilderness-based experiences in which students participate in a variety of adventurous challenges and outdoor activities such as hiking, climbing, canoeing, ropes courses and group games. Outdoor education draws upon the philosophy, theory, and practices of experiential education and environmental education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental education</span> Branch of pedagogy

Environmental education (EE) refers to organized efforts to teach how natural environments function, and particularly, how human beings can manage behavior and ecosystems to live sustainably. It is a multi-disciplinary field integrating disciplines such as biology, chemistry, physics, ecology, earth science, atmospheric science, mathematics, and geography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sage Hall</span> Building in New York, United States

Sage Hall was built in 1875 at Cornell University's Ithaca, New York campus. Originally designed as a residential building, it currently houses the Johnson Graduate School of Management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wilbur S. Jackman</span>

Wilbur Samuel Jackman was an American educator and one of the originators of the nature study movement.

"Strengths and weaknesses of evolution" is a controversial phrase that has been proposed for public school science curricula. Those proposing the phrase, such as the chairman of the Texas State Board of Education (SBOE), Don McLeroy, purport that there are weaknesses in the theory of evolution and in the evidence that life has evolved that should be taught for a balanced treatment of the subject of evolution. The scientific community rejects that any substantive weaknesses exist in the scientific theory, or in the data that it explains, and views the examples that have been given in support of the phrasing as being without merit and long refuted.

Modern environmental education in the United States began to take shape in the late 19th century with the Nature Study movement, which grew out of efforts to promote the field of natural history by naturalists including Harvard professor Louis Agassiz (1807-1873) and Anna Botsford Comstock, whose Handbook of Nature Study was published in 1911.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edith Marion Patch</span> American entomologist

Edith Marion Patch was an American entomologist and writer. Born in Worcester, Massachusetts, she received a degree from the University of Minnesota in 1901 and originally embarked on a career as an English teacher before receiving the opportunity to organize the entomology department at the University of Maine. She became the head of the entomology department in 1904, and, despite misgivings from several male colleagues about having a female department head, she remained in this post until her retirement in 1937. Patch is recognized as the first truly successful professional woman entomologist in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lucretia Crocker</span> American science educator

Lucretia Crocker was an American science educator. Crocker founded the Women’s Education Association in 1872.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Margaretta Morris</span> American entomologist

Margaretta Hare Morris was an American entomologist. Morris and the astronomer Maria Mitchell were the first women elected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1850. She was also the second woman elected to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia in 1859, after Lucy Say.

Bertha Louise Chapman Cady (1873–1956) was an American entomologist and educator.

Sally Gregory Kohlstedt is an American historian of science. She is a professor in the Department of Earth Sciences and in the Program in History of Science and Technology at the University of Minnesota. Kohlstedt served as the president of the History of Science Society from 1992 to 1993. Her research interests focus on the history of science in American culture and the demographics of scientific practice in institutions such as museums and educational institutions, including gender participation.

Farida Anna Wiley (1889-1986) was an American naturalist, ornithologist and educator who worked with the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. Wiley was known for her 7 am walking tours and natural science field trips of Central Park and Greater New York, and was an author, illustrator, teacher and historian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Florence Wells Slater</span> American entomologist

Mary Florence Wells Slater was an American entomologist and educator. After graduating from St. Mary's School in 1882, she served on the faculty there as a science teacher. Slater went on to study entomology at Cornell University, working as a research assistant for John Henry Comstock. In 1899 she published the article The Egg-Carrying Habitat of Zaitha, which made corrections to an error in Comstock's earlier published work. She went on to teach within the New York City Department of Education, most notably at Washington Irving High School in Gramercy Park. Slater was an advocate for teacher pensions in New York and for equal pay for equal work in the United States.

Ruby Green Smith (1878-1960) was an American entomologist, peace campaigner and home economics educator. She is known for having authored The Home Bureau Creed.

References