Ndutu cranium

Last updated
Ndutu cranium
Ndutu digital reconstruction.jpg
Digital reconstruction by Montiel and Lorenzo (2023).
Common nameNdutu cranium
Species Homo, species uncertain
Age450±40 ka
Place discovered Lake Turkana
Date discoveredSeptember and October 1973
Discovered by Amini Mturi

The Ndutu skull is the partial cranium of a hominin that has been assigned variously to late Homo erectus , [1] Homo rhodesiensis , [2] [3] [4] and early Homo sapiens , [5] from the Middle Pleistocene, found at Lake Ndutu in northern Tanzania.

Contents

Discovery

Lake Ndutu is a seasonal soda lake in the Serengeti, adjacent to Lake Masek and the Main Gorge at Olduvai. During September and October 1973, Amini Aza Mturi and the Tanzanian Department of Antiquities conducted an excavation of the exposed flats of the western shoreline of Lake Ndutu. [6] The excavation site was approximately 140 m2 (1,500 sq ft) in area and had considerable amounts of lithic and faunal material on the surface; the Ndutu cranium was found on the first occupational floor of the site. [6] Amini Aza Mturi's excavation found 270 lithic and faunal materials in the first occupational floor of the excavation site, of which 20 were definitive tools. [6] The tools were mainly spheroids and hammerstones, with six flakes (three regular flakes, two triangular, one rectangular). [6] Amini Aza Mturi noticed the absence of Acheulean tools during his excavation, despite the cranial features of the skull being associated with the Acheulean industry. [6] However, hand axes were later discovered during later visits to the site.

According to Amini Aza Mturi, preliminary chronometric dating and racemization of bone found in the first occupational level has yielded a general age of 500,000 and 600,000 years. [6] Other estimates based on the association of the Ndutu deposits with the Masek Beds at Olduvai suggest an age approaching 400,000 years. [7]

Reconstruction and analysis

Initial state of specimen

The occipital was well preserved and almost completely intact. [1] The temporals were damaged; the left temporal was more complete than the right temporal. [1] The parietals were shattered; the majority of the right parietal was reconstructed, along with fragments of the left parietal. [1] The frontal was mostly gone, a small piece of the right side above the brow ridge remained. [1] The central region of the face includes much of the nasal aperture, part of the left nasal bone, part of the orbital rims with the lacrimal grooves, parts of the sphenoid, and much of the right orbital plate. [1] Part of the right side of the face is preserved down to the infraorbital foramen, and on the left side there is a part that goes down to the palate, where the roots for the left canine, P3, P4, M1, and M2 are found. [1]

Reconstruction

Ndutu Fossil Replica based on the now inaccurate, Clarke reconstruction. Nduru Fossil Replica 01.JPG
Ndutu Fossil Replica based on the now inaccurate, Clarke reconstruction.

The Ndutu cranium was badly damaged and fragmented when it was found. [1] The pieces of the skull were repaired and reconstructed by R.J. Clarke who authored the initial description. [6] Gustavo Montiel and Carlos Lorenzo (2023) note that Clarke's initial reconstruction, which was reformed by hand, was littered with technical errors that are more accurately fixed by modern technology, including retrodeformation, three dimensional assembly, and reflection. After having realized that the morphology of the specimen matched Sima de los Huesos (SH) 5 from Spain, Ndutu was fully reconstructed. In their study, they state that they intend their work as a founding for future phylogenetic studies, of which this specimen is rarely included in. [8]

Anatomy

The occipital has a well-developed nuchal torus that gives the skull an angulated lateral contour similar to Homo erectus. [1] The mastoid process is small, and its posterior part is flat and lies in the nuchal plane, particularly similar to Olduvai hominids 9 and 12. [1] The frontal bone has an almost vertical forehead, similar to Homo erectus, but unlike the Ngangdong or the Broken Hill crania. [1] The walls of the frontal, occipital, parietals, and temporals, were very thick. [1] Where it is similar to H. sapiens, the sides of the braincase are more vertical when viewed from the back. [1] The right tympanic plate has an ossified styloid process. [1] There appears to be no sagittal torus. [1] The supramastoid crest does not extend over the external acoustic meatus. [1] G. Philip Rightmire stressed Ndutu's affinities to archaic H. sapiens and even proposed its allocation to a subspecies of it. [9] [10] [5] The updated reconstruction of Ndutu suggests that the specimen has a more prognathic face, a narrower vault and a brow that projects less and is narrower than Clarke's reconstruction. Their updated morphological evaluation reveals that the parietal bosses previously used to support allocation to H. sapiens are not present. The sagittal profile is similar to Broken Hill. [8]

Controversy

According to Clarke, the Ndutu skull seemed to form a link between Homo erectus and archaic Homo sapiens, due to it having certain features in common with both [1] [11] and was granted classification as Homo erectus. [7] G. Philip Rightmire disagreed with this classification, and believed that its features suggested that it was more similar to the African fossils referred to as archaic Homo sapiens. [7] According to Rightmire, the length and breadth dimensions of the Ndutu cranium are similar to earlier Homo erectus fossils from Koobi Fora and Illeret, while its size is more similar to OH 12 than OH 9. [7] Based on the occipital morphology, mastoid shape, glenoid cavity, and tympanic plate of the Ndutu hominid, Rightmire claims that the fossil hominids it most resembles are Broken Hill, Elandsfontein, and other archaic Homo sapiens found in Africa. [7] Chris Stringer classifies the cranium as belonging to Homo heidelbergensis/Homo rhodesiensis (a species considered to be intermediate between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens) rather than as early H. sapiens, but considers it to display a "more sapiens-like zygomaxillary morphology" than certain other examples of Homo rhodesiensis. [12] In later work, he details it as a sole sister to the Neanderthal and another group containing the Steinheim skull, plus a group related to Homo antecessor , Homo longi , and Homo sapiens, [13] and Montiel and Lorenzo (2023) found very strong morphological similarity with SH 5. [8]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Homo heidelbergensis</i> Extinct species of archaic human

Homo heidelbergensis is an extinct species or subspecies of archaic human which existed during the Middle Pleistocene. It was subsumed as a subspecies of H. erectus in 1950 as H. e. heidelbergensis, but towards the end of the century, it was more widely classified as its own species. It is debated whether or not to constrain H. heidelbergensis to only Europe or to also include African and Asian specimens, and this is further confounded by the type specimen being a jawbone, because jawbones feature few diagnostic traits and are generally missing among Middle Pleistocene specimens. Thus, it is debated if some of these specimens could be split off into their own species or a subspecies of H. erectus. Because the classification is so disputed, the Middle Pleistocene is often called the "muddle in the middle".

<i>Meganthropus</i> Hominin fossil

Meganthropus is an extinct genus of non-hominin hominid ape, known from the Pleistocene of Indonesia. It is known from a series of large jaw and skull fragments found at the Sangiran site near Surakarta in Central Java, Indonesia, alongside several isolated teeth. The genus has a long and convoluted taxonomic history. The original fossils were ascribed to a new species, Meganthropus palaeojavanicus, and for a long time was considered invalid, with the genus name being used as an informal name for the fossils.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herto Man</span> Number of early modern human fossils found in Herto Bouri, Ethiopia

Herto Man refers to human remains discovered in 1997 from the Upper Herto member of the Bouri Formation in the Afar Triangle, Ethiopia. The remains have been dated as between 154,000 and 160,000 years old. The discovery of Herto Man was especially significant at the time, falling within a long gap in the fossil record between 300 and 100 thousand years ago and representing the oldest dated H. sapiens remains then described.

<i>Homo rhodesiensis</i> Species of primate (fossil)

Homo rhodesiensis is the species name proposed by Arthur Smith Woodward (1921) to classify Kabwe 1, a Middle Stone Age fossil recovered from Broken Hill mine in Kabwe, Northern Rhodesia. In 2020, the skull was dated to 324,000 to 274,000 years ago. Other similar older specimens also exist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ceprano Man</span> Prehistoric human skull cap from Italy

Ceprano Man, Argil, and Ceprano Calvarium, is a Middle Pleistocene archaic human fossil, a single skull cap (calvarium), accidentally unearthed in a highway construction project in 1994 near Ceprano in the Province of Frosinone, Italy. It was initially considered Homo cepranensis, Homo erectus, or possibly Homo antecessor; but in recent studies, most regard it either as a form of Homo heidelbergensis sharing affinities with African forms, or an early morph of Neanderthal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aris Poulianos</span> Greek anthropologist and archaeologist (1924–2021)

Aris Poulianos was a Greek anthropologist and archaeologist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steinheim skull</span> Hominin fossil

The Steinheim skull is a fossilized skull of a Homo neanderthalensis or Homo heidelbergensis found on 24 July 1933 near Steinheim an der Murr, Germany.

The Omo remains are a collection of hominin bones discovered between 1967 and 1974 at the Omo Kibish sites near the Omo River, in Omo National Park in south-western Ethiopia. The bones were recovered by a scientific team from the Kenya National Museums directed by Richard Leakey and others. The remains from Kamoya's Hominid Site (KHS) were called Omo I and those from Paul I. Abell's Hominid Site (PHS) were called Omo II.

Human taxonomy is the classification of the human species within zoological taxonomy. The systematic genus, Homo, is designed to include both anatomically modern humans and extinct varieties of archaic humans. Current humans have been designated as subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens, differentiated, according to some, from the direct ancestor, Homo sapiens idaltu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaic humans</span> Extinct relatives of modern humans

A number of varieties of Homo are grouped into the broad category of archaic humans in the period that precedes and is contemporary to the emergence of the earliest early modern humans around 300 ka. Among the earliest remains of H. sapiens are those from Jebel Irhoud in Morocco, Florisbad in South Africa (259 ka), and Omo-Kibish I in southern Ethiopia. The term typically includes H. antecessor, H. bodoensis, Denisovans (H. denisova), H. heidelbergensis (600–200 ka), Neanderthals, and H. rhodesiensis (300–125 ka).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">He County</span> County in Anhui, Peoples Republic of China

He County or Hexian is a county in the east of Anhui Province, People's Republic of China, under the jurisdiction of Ma'anshan. It has a population of 650,000 and an area of 1,412 square kilometres (545 sq mi). The government of He County is located in Liyang Town.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronald J. Clarke</span> South African paleoanthropologist

Ronald John Clarke is a paleoanthropologist most notable for the discovery of "Little Foot", an extraordinarily complete skeleton of Australopithecus, in the Sterkfontein Caves. A more technical description of various aspects of his description of the Australopithecus skeleton was published in the Journal of Quaternary Science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dali Man</span> Hominin fossil

Dali man is the remains of a late Homo erectus or archaic Homo sapiens who lived in the late-mid Pleistocene epoch. The remains comprise a complete fossilized skull, which was discovered by Liu Shuntang in 1978 in Dali County, Shaanxi Province, China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samu (fossil)</span> Hominin fossil

Samu is the nickname given to a fragmentary Middle Pleistocene human occipital, also known as Vertesszolos Man or Vertesszolos occipital, discovered in Vértesszőlős, Central Transdanubia, Hungary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Florisbad Skull</span> Hominin fossil

The Florisbad Skull is an important human fossil of the early Middle Stone Age, representing either late Homo heidelbergensis or early Homo sapiens. It was discovered in 1932 by T. F. Dreyer at the Florisbad site, Free State Province, South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chellean Man</span> Hominin fossil

Olduvai Hominid number 9, known as the Chellean Man, is a fossilized skull cap of an early hominin, found in LLK II, Olduvai Gorge by Louis S. B. Leakey in 1960. It is believed to be ca. 1.4 million years old. Its cranial capacity is estimated at than 1067 cm3, the largest value among all known African Homo erectus specimens. OH 9 is significant because the features it carried and its correlation to the species classification it resides in.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kabwe 1</span> Hominin fossil

Kabwe 1, also known as the Broken Hill skull and Rhodesian Man, is a Middle Paleolithic fossil assigned by Arthur Smith Woodward in 1921 as the type specimen for Homo rhodesiensis, now mostly considered a synonym of Homo heidelbergensis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dmanisi hominins</span> Hominid species or subspecies discovered in Dmanisi, Georgia

The Dmanisi hominins, Dmanisi people, or Dmanisi man were a population of Early Pleistocene hominins whose fossils have been recovered at Dmanisi, Georgia. The fossils and stone tools recovered at Dmanisi range in age from 1.85 to 1.77 million years old, making the Dmanisi hominins the earliest well-dated hominin fossils in Eurasia and the best preserved fossils of early Homo from a single site so early in time, though earlier fossils and artifacts have been found in Asia. Though their precise classification is controversial and disputed, the Dmanisi fossils are highly significant within research on early hominin migrations out of Africa. The Dmanisi hominins are known from over a hundred postcranial fossils and five famous well-preserved skulls, referred to as Dmanisi Skulls 1–5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sambungmacan crania</span> Series of hominin fossils discovered in Indonesia

The hominin remains discovered at Sambungmacan are a series of four archaic human fossils assigned to Homo erectus and discovered in Java. The first is the calvarium is Sm 1, the second is a tibial fragment Sm 2, and the third and fourth are calvaria Sm 3 and Sm 4. Laitman and Tattersall (2001) suggested naming Sm 3, the second calvarium in the series, Homo erectus newyorkensis, but later sources do not agree with this taxonomic scheme.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Salé cranium</span> Enigmatic Middle Pleistocene hominin specimen

The Salé cranium is a pathological specimen of enigmatic Middle Pleistocene hominin discovered from Salé, Morocco by quarrymen in 1971. Since its discovery, the specimen has variously been classified as Homo sapiens, Homo erectus, Homo rhodesiensis/bodoensis, or Homo heidelbergensis. Its pathological condition and mosaic anatomy has proved difficult to classify. It was discovered with few faunal fossils and no lithics, tentatively dated to 400 ka by some sources.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Clarke, R.J. (August 1976). “New cranium of Homo erectus from Lake Ndutu, Tanzania”. Nature 262: 485-487.
  2. Stringer, C. (2016). "The origin and evolution of Homo sapiens". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 371 (1698): 20150237. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0237. PMC   4920294 . PMID   27298468.
  3. Bones, Stones and Molecules: "Out of Africa" and Human Origins, By David W. Cameron, Colin P. Groves, p. 186, Elsevier Academic Press, 2004
  4. Image at Smithsonian
  5. 1 2 Klein, Richard G. (2009-04-22). The Human Career: Human Biological and Cultural Origins, Third Edition. University of Chicago Press. ISBN   978-0-226-02752-4.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mturi, A A (August 1976). “New hominid from Lake Ndutu, Tanzania”. Nature 262: 484-485.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Rightmire, Philip G. (1983). “The Lake Ndutu Cranium and Early Homo Sapiens in Africa”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 61:245-254
  8. 1 2 3 4 Montial, Gustavo; Lorenzo, Carlos (2023), "A New Virtual Reconstruction of the Ndutu Cranium", Heritage, 6 (3): 2822–2850, doi: 10.3390/heritage6030151
  9. Prakash, M. (2007). Fundamentals of Gene Evolution. Discovery Publishing House. ISBN   978-81-8356-190-7.
  10. Rightmire, G. Philip (1983). "The Lake Ndutu cranium and early Homo Sapiens in Africa". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 61 (2): 245–254. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330610214. ISSN   1096-8644. PMID   6410925.
  11. Stringer, C. (2016). "The origin and evolution of Homo sapiens". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 371 (1698): 20150237. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0237. PMC   4920294 . PMID   27298468.
  12. Stringer, C. (2016). "The origin and evolution of Homo sapiens". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 371 (1698): 20150237. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0237. PMC   4920294 . PMID   27298468.
  13. Ni, Xijun; Ji, Qiang; Wu, Wensheng; Shao, Qingfeng; Ji, Yannan; Zhang, Chi; Liang, Lei; Ge, Junyi; Guo, Zhen; Li, Jinhua; Li, Qiang; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris (2021-08-28). "Massive cranium from Harbin in northeastern China establishes a new Middle Pleistocene human lineage". The Innovation. 2 (3): 100130. Bibcode:2021Innov...200130N. doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100130. ISSN   2666-6758. PMC   8454562 . PMID   34557770.