Neurofeedback

Last updated

Neurofeedback training process diagram Neurofeedback Process Diagram.png
Neurofeedback training process diagram

Neurofeedback is a form of biofeedback that uses electrical potentials in the brain to reinforce desired brain states through operant conditioning. This process is non-invasive and typically collects brain activity data using electroencephalography (EEG). Several neurofeedback protocols exist, with potential additional benefit from use of quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to localize and personalize treatment. [1] [2] Related technologies include functional near-infrared spectroscopy-mediated (fNIRS) neurofeedback, hemoencephalography biofeedback (HEG), and fMRI biofeedback.

Contents

Neurofeedback has been shown to trigger positive behavioral outcomes, such as relieving symptoms related to psychiatric disorders or improving specific cognitive functions in healthy participants. These positive behavioral outcomes rely on brain plasticity mechanisms and the ability of subjects to learn throughout life. [3]

History

In 1898, Edward Thorndike formulated the law of effect. In his work, he theorized that behavior is shaped by satisfying or discomforting consequences. This set the foundation for operant conditioning.[ citation needed ]

In 1924, the German psychiatrist Hans Berger connected several electrodes to a patient's scalp and detected a small current by using a ballistic galvanometer. In his subsequent studies, Berger analyzed EEGs qualitatively, but in 1932, G. Dietsch applied Fourier analysis to seven EEG records and later became the first researcher to apply quantitative EEG (QEEG).

In 1950, Neal E. Miller of Yale University was able to train mice to regulate their heartbeat frequency. Later on, he continued his work with humans, training them through auditory feedback. [4]

The first study to demonstrate neurofeedback was reported by Joe Kamiya in 1962. [5] [6] Kamiya's experiment had two parts: In the first part, a subject was asked to keep their eyes closed, and when a tone sounded, to say whether they were experiencing alpha waves. Initially, the subject would guess correctly about fifty percent of the time, but some subjects would eventually develop the ability to better distinguish between states. [7]

M. Barry Sterman trained cats to modify their EEG patterns to exhibit more of the so-called sensorimotor rhythm (SMR). He published this research in 1967. Sterman subsequently discovered that the SMR-trained cats were much more resistant to epileptic seizures after exposure to the convulsant chemical monomethylhydrazine than non-trained cats. [8] In 1971, he reported similar improvements with an epileptic patient whose seizures could be controlled through SMR training. [9] Joel Lubar contributed to the research of EEG biofeedback, starting with epilepsy [10] and later with hyperactivity and ADHD. [11] Ming-Yang Cheng was instrumental in advancing research on EEG neurofeedback, specifically targeting enhancements in SMR power among skilled golfers. [12]

Neuroplasticity

In 2010, a study provided some evidence of neuroplastic changes occurring after brainwave training. In this study, half an hour of voluntary control of brain rhythms led to a lasting shift in cortical excitability and intracortical function. [13] The authors observed that the cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was significantly enhanced after neurofeedback, persisted for at least twenty minutes, and was correlated with an EEG time-course indicative of activity-dependent plasticity [13]

Types of neurofeedback

The term neurofeedback is not legally protected. There are various approaches that give feedback about neuronal activity, and as such are referred to as "neurofeedback" by their respective operators. Distinctions can be made on several levels. The first takes into account which technology is being used (EEG, [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [12] fMRI, [19] [20] [21] [22] fNIRS, [23] HEG). Nonetheless, further distinctions are crucial even within the realm of EEG neurofeedback, as different methodologies of analysis can be chosen, some of which are backed up by a higher number of peer-reviewed studies, whereas for others, scientific literature is scarce, and explanatory models are entirely missing.

Despite these differences, a common denominator can be found in the requirement of providing feedback. Usually, feedback is provided by auditory or visual input. While original feedback was provided by sounding tones according to neurological activity, many new ways have been found. It is possible to listen to music or podcasts where the volume is controlled as feedback, for example. Often, visual feedback is used in the form of animations on a TV screen. Visual feedback can also be provided in combination with videos and films, or even during reading tasks where the brightness of the screen represents the direct feedback. Simple games can also be used, where the game itself is controlled by the brain activity. Recent developments have tried to incorporate virtual reality (VR), and controllers can already be used for more involved engagement with the feedback.

EEG neurofeedback

Frequency band / amplitude training

Amplitude training, or frequency band training (used synonymously), is the method with the largest body of scientific literature; it also represents the original method of EEG neurofeedback. [5] [9] [11] The EEG signal is analyzed with respect to its frequency spectrum, split into the common frequency bands used in EEG neuroscience (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma). The activity involves training the amplitude of a certain frequency band on a defined location on the scalp to higher or lower values.

Depending on the training goal (for example, increasing attention and focus, [24] [25] reaching a calm state, [26] reducing epileptic seizures, [9] [27] [28] etc.), the electrodes have to be placed in different positions. Additionally, the trained frequency bands and the training directions (to higher or lower amplitudes) might vary according to the training goal.

Thus, EEG wave components that are expected to be beneficial to the training goal are rewarded with positive feedback when appearing and/or increasing in amplitude. Frequency band amplitudes that are expected to be hindering are trained downwards by reinforcement through the feedback.

As an example, considering ADHD, this would result in training low-beta or mid-beta frequencies in the central-to-frontal lobe to increase in amplitude, while simultaneously trying to reduce theta and high-beta amplitudes in the same region of the brain. [29] [30] [31]

In the sports domain, SMR training has garnered attention, with a substantial body of research suggesting that enhancing it could improve performance. [32] This improvement is particularly evident after multiple training sessions [12] designed to enhance motor skills critical for precise movements. Such precision is required in various sports activities, [33] including golf putting, soccer free kicks, and basketball free throws.

SCP training

For SCP (slow cortical potentials) training, one trains the DC voltage component of the EEG signal. The application of this type of EEG neurofeedback training was mostly endorsed by research done by Niels Birbaumer and his group. The most common symptom base for SCP training is ADHD, whereas SCPs also find their application in brain-computer interfaces. [34]

LORETA (low resolution electromagnetic tomography analysis) training

Normal EEG signals are restricted to the surface of the scalp. Using a high number of electrodes (19 or more), the source of certain electrical events can be localized. Similar to a tomography that renders a 3D image out of many 2D images, the many EEG channels are used to create LORETA images that represent in 3D the electrical activity distribution within the brain. The LORETA method can be used in combination with MRI to merge structural and functional activities. It is able to provide even better temporal resolution than PET or fMRI. For the application with live neurofeedback, however, 19-channel neurofeedback and LORETA has limited scientific evidence, and until now, shows no benefit over traditional 1- or 2-channel neurofeedback. [35]

Discussion and critique

There is ongoing discussion about the effect size of neurofeedback in the scientific literature. As neurofeedback is explained mostly based on the model of operant conditioning, [36] the sensitivity of the feedback (the difficulty to receive a reward) also plays a role. It has been shown that the desired conditioning can be reversed if threshold values are set too low. [37] Other publications have not found any effect of neurofeedback, apart from placebo, when using automatic thresholds that update every thirty seconds in order to maintain a constant success rate of 80%. [38] [39]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</span> Neurodevelopmental disorder

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by executive dysfunction occasioning symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity and emotional dysregulation that are excessive and pervasive, impairing in multiple contexts, and otherwise age-inappropriate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biofeedback</span> Gaining awareness of biological processes

Biofeedback is the technique of gaining greater awareness of many physiological functions of one's own body by using electronic or other instruments, and with a goal of being able to manipulate the body's systems at will. Humans conduct biofeedback naturally all the time, at varied levels of consciousness and intentionality. Biofeedback and the biofeedback loop can also be thought of as self-regulation. Some of the processes that can be controlled include brainwaves, muscle tone, skin conductance, heart rate and pain perception.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta wave</span> High amplitude low frequency brain wave

Delta waves are high amplitude neural oscillations with a frequency between 0.5 and 4 hertz. Delta waves, like other brain waves, can be recorded with electroencephalography (EEG) and are usually associated with the deep stage 3 of NREM sleep, also known as slow-wave sleep (SWS), and aid in characterizing the depth of sleep. Suppression of delta waves leads to inability of body rejuvenation, brain revitalization and poor sleep.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brain–computer interface</span> Direct communication pathway between an enhanced or wired brain and an external device

A brain–computer interface (BCI), sometimes called a brain–machine interface (BMI) or smartbrain, is a direct communication pathway between the brain's electrical activity and an external device, most commonly a computer or robotic limb. BCIs are often directed at researching, mapping, assisting, augmenting, or repairing human cognitive or sensory-motor functions. They are often conceptualized as a human–machine interface that skips the intermediary component of the physical movement of body parts, although they also raise the possibility of the erasure of the discreteness of brain and machine. Implementations of BCIs range from non-invasive and partially invasive to invasive, based on how close electrodes get to brain tissue.

Neurotechnology encompasses any method or electronic device which interfaces with the nervous system to monitor or modulate neural activity.

A gamma wave or gamma rhythm is a pattern of neural oscillation in humans with a frequency between 25 and 140 Hz, the 40 Hz point being of particular interest. Gamma rhythms are correlated with large-scale brain network activity and cognitive phenomena such as working memory, attention, and perceptual grouping, and can be increased in amplitude via meditation or neurostimulation. Altered gamma activity has been observed in many mood and cognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, and schizophrenia.

Hemoencephalography (HEG) is a neurofeedback technique in the field of neurotherapy. Neurofeedback, a specific form of biofeedback, is based on the idea that human beings can consciously alter their brain function through training sessions in which they attempt to change the signal generated by their brain and measured via a neurological feedback mechanism. On completion of the process, participants increase cerebral blood flow to a specified region of the brain, consequently increasing brain activity and performance on tasks involving the specific region of the brain.

The sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) is a brain wave. It is an oscillatory idle rhythm of synchronized electric brain activity. It appears in spindles in recordings of EEG, MEG, and ECoG over the sensorimotor cortex. For most individuals, the frequency of the SMR is in the range of 7 to 11 Hz.

Beta waves, or beta rhythm, are a type of neural oscillations (brainwave) in the brain with a frequency range of between 12.5 and 30 Hz. Beta waves can be split into three sections: Low Beta Waves ; Beta Waves ; and High Beta Waves. Beta states are the states associated with normal waking consciousness.

Alpha waves, or the alpha rhythm, are neural oscillations in the frequency range of 8–12 Hz likely originating from the synchronous and coherent electrical activity of thalamic pacemaker cells in humans. Historically, they are also called "Berger's waves" after Hans Berger, who first described them when he invented the EEG in 1924.

Brainwave entrainment, also referred to as brainwave synchronization or neural entrainment, refers to the observation that brainwaves will naturally synchronize to the rhythm of periodic external stimuli, such as flickering lights, speech, music, or tactile stimuli.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mu wave</span> Electrical activity in the part of the brain controlling voluntary movement

The sensorimotor mu rhythm, also known as mu wave, comb or wicket rhythms or arciform rhythms, are synchronized patterns of electrical activity involving large numbers of neurons, probably of the pyramidal type, in the part of the brain that controls voluntary movement. These patterns as measured by electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), or electrocorticography (ECoG), repeat at a frequency of 7.5–12.5 Hz, and are most prominent when the body is physically at rest. Unlike the alpha wave, which occurs at a similar frequency over the resting visual cortex at the back of the scalp, the mu rhythm is found over the motor cortex, in a band approximately from ear to ear. People suppress mu rhythms when they perform motor actions or, with practice, when they visualize performing motor actions. This suppression is called desynchronization of the wave because EEG wave forms are caused by large numbers of neurons firing in synchrony. The mu rhythm is even suppressed when one observes another person performing a motor action or an abstract motion with biological characteristics. Researchers such as V. S. Ramachandran and colleagues have suggested that this is a sign that the mirror neuron system is involved in mu rhythm suppression, although others disagree.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder management options are evidence-based practices with established treatment efficacy for ADHD.

The Applied Neuroscience Society of Australasia (ANSA) is a non-profit professional organization for applied neuroscience in Australia, with members in Australia, New Zealand and Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electroencephalography</span> Electrophysiological monitoring method to record electrical activity of the brain

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a method to record an electrogram of the spontaneous electrical activity of the brain. The biosignals detected by EEG have been shown to represent the postsynaptic potentials of pyramidal neurons in the neocortex and allocortex. It is typically non-invasive, with the EEG electrodes placed along the scalp using the International 10–20 system, or variations of it. Electrocorticography, involving surgical placement of electrodes, is sometimes called "intracranial EEG". Clinical interpretation of EEG recordings is most often performed by visual inspection of the tracing or quantitative EEG analysis.

Thomas Hice Budzynski was an American psychologist and a pioneer in the field of biofeedback, inventing one of the first electromyographic biofeedback training systems in the mid-1960s. In the early 1970s, he developed the Twilight Learner in collaboration with John Picchiottino. The Twilight Learner was one of the first neurotherapy systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Resting state fMRI</span> Type of functional magnetic resonance imaging

Resting state fMRI is a method of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) that is used in brain mapping to evaluate regional interactions that occur in a resting or task-negative state, when an explicit task is not being performed. A number of resting-state brain networks have been identified, one of which is the default mode network. These brain networks are observed through changes in blood flow in the brain which creates what is referred to as a blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal that can be measured using fMRI.

Bioelectromagnetic medicine deals with the phenomenon of resonance signaling and discusses how specific frequencies modulate cellular function to restore or maintain health. Such electromagnetic (EM) signals are then called "medical information" that is used in health informatics.

NeuroIntegration Therapy (NIT) is a non-invasive combination therapy that integrates quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG or QEEG) brain mapping with additional therapies such as neurofeedback, vibroacoustic therapy, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT, or PEMF therapy) and photic stimulation (light therapy.)

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matthew Sacchet</span> American neuroscientist

Matthew D. Sacchet is a neuroscientist, Associate Professor of Psychiatry, and Director of the Meditation Research Program at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital. His research focuses on advancing the science of meditation and includes studies of brain structure and function using multimodal neuroimaging, in addition to clinical trials, neuromodulation, and computational approaches. He is notable for his work at the intersection of meditation, neuroscience, and mental illness. His work has been cited over 6,000 times and covered by major media outlets including CBS, NBC, NPR, Time, Vox, and The Wall Street Journal. In 2017 Forbes Magazine selected Sacchet for the “30 Under 30”.

References

  1. ↑ Mehler DM, Sokunbi MO, Habes I, Barawi K, Subramanian L, Range M, et al. (December 2018). "Targeting the affective brain-a randomized controlled trial of real-time fMRI neurofeedback in patients with depression". Neuropsychopharmacology. 43 (13): 2578–2585. doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0126-5. PMC   6186421 . PMID   29967368.
  2. ↑ Arns M, Drinkenburg W, Leon Kenemans J (September 2012). "The effects of QEEG-informed neurofeedback in ADHD: an open-label pilot study". Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 37 (3): 171–80. doi:10.1007/s10484-012-9191-4. PMC   3419351 . PMID   22446998.
  3. ↑ Loriette C (2021). "Neurofeedback for cognitive enhancement and intervention and brain plasticity". Revue Neurologique. 177 (9): 1133–1144. doi:10.1016/j.neurol.2021.08.004. PMID   34674879.
  4. ↑ Pickering TG, Miller NE (1 September 1975). "Learned Voluntary Control of Heart Rate and Rhythm in Two Subjects with Premature Ventricular Contractions". Clinical Science. 49 (3): 17P–18P. doi:10.1042/cs049017Pd. ISSN   0301-0538.
  5. 1 2 Kamiya J (1979), "Autoregulation of the EEG Alpha Rhythm: A Program for the Study of Consciousness", Mind/Body Integration, Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 289–297, doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2898-8_25, ISBN   978-1-4613-2900-8 , retrieved 28 April 2023
  6. ↑ Kamiya J (22 February 2011). "The First Communications About Operant Conditioning of the EEG". Journal of Neurotherapy. 15 (1): 65–73. doi: 10.1080/10874208.2011.545764 . ISSN   1087-4208.
  7. ↑ Frederick JA (September 2012). "Psychophysics of EEG alpha state discrimination". Consciousness and Cognition. 21 (3): 1345–1354. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.009. PMC   3424312 . PMID   22800733.
  8. ↑ Sterman MB (January 2000). "Basic Concepts and Clinical Findings in the Treatment of Seizure Disorders with EEG Operant Conditioning". Clinical Electroencephalography. 31 (1): 45–55. doi:10.1177/155005940003100111. ISSN   0009-9155. PMID   10638352. S2CID   43506749.
  9. 1 2 3 Sterman M, Friar L (July 1972). "Suppression of seizures in an epileptic following sensorimotor EEG feedback training". Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 33 (1): 89–95. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4. PMID   4113278.
  10. ↑ Seifert A, Lubar J (November 1975). "Reduction of epileptic seizures through EEG biofeedback training". Biological Psychology. 3 (3): 157–184. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(75)90033-2. PMID   812560. S2CID   15698128.
  11. 1 2 Lubar JF, Shouse MN (September 1976). "EEG and behavioral changes in a hyperkinetic child concurrent with training of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR): A preliminary report". Biofeedback and Self-Regulation. 1 (3): 293–306. doi:10.1007/BF01001170. ISSN   0363-3586. PMID   990355. S2CID   17141352.
  12. 1 2 3 Cheng M, Huang C, Chang Y, Koester D, Schack T, Hung T (1 December 2015). "Sensorimotor Rhythm Neurofeedback Enhances Golf Putting Performance". Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 37 (6): 626–636. doi:10.1123/jsep.2015-0166. ISSN   1543-2904. PMID   26866770.
  13. 1 2 Ros T, Munneke MA, Ruge D, Gruzelier JH, Rothwell JC (February 2010). "Endogenous control of waking brain rhythms induces neuroplasticity in humans". The European Journal of Neuroscience. 31 (4): 770–8. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07100.x. PMID   20384819. S2CID   16969327.
  14. ↑ Lubar JF, Swartwood MO, Swartwood JN, O'Donnell PH (1 March 1995). "Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in T.O.V.A. scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance". Biofeedback and Self-Regulation. 20 (1): 83–99. doi:10.1007/BF01712768. ISSN   1573-3270. PMID   7786929. S2CID   19193823.
  15. ↑ Kluetsch RC, Ros T, Théberge J, Frewen PA, Calhoun VD, Schmahl C, Jetly R, Lanius RA (August 2014). "Plastic modulation of PTSD resting-state networks and subjective wellbeing by EEG neurofeedback". Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 130 (2): 123–136. doi:10.1111/acps.12229. PMC   4442612 . PMID   24266644.
  16. ↑ Reiter K, Andersen SB, Carlsson J (February 2016). "Neurofeedback Treatment and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Effectiveness of Neurofeedback on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and the Optimal Choice of Protocol". Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease. 204 (2): 69–77. doi:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000418. ISSN   0022-3018. PMID   26825263. S2CID   25210316.
  17. ↑ Micoulaud-Franchi J, Geoffroy PA, Fond G, Lopez R, Bioulac S, Philip P (2014). "EEG neurofeedback treatments in children with ADHD: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8: 906. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00906 . ISSN   1662-5161. PMC   4230047 . PMID   25431555.
  18. ↑ Omejc N, Rojc B, Battaglini PP, Marusic U (20 November 2018). "Review of the therapeutic neurofeedback method using electroencephalography: EEG Neurofeedback". Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 19 (3): 213–220. doi:10.17305/bjbms.2018.3785. ISSN   1840-4812. PMC   6716090 . PMID   30465705.
  19. ↑ Zotev V, Phillips R, Yuan H, Misaki M, Bodurka J (15 January 2014). "Self-regulation of human brain activity using simultaneous real-time fMRI and EEG neurofeedback". NeuroImage. Neuro-enhancement. 85: 985–995. arXiv: 1301.4689 . doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.126. ISSN   1053-8119. PMID   23668969. S2CID   2836232.
  20. ↑ Pindi P, Houenou J, Piguet C, Favre P (December 2022). "Real-time fMRI neurofeedback as a new treatment for psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis". Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 119: 110605. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110605 . PMID   35843369. S2CID   250586279.
  21. ↑ Linhartová P, Látalová A, Kóša B, Kašpárek T, Schmahl C, Paret C (June 2019). "fMRI neurofeedback in emotion regulation: A literature review". NeuroImage. 193: 75–92. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.011. PMID   30862532. S2CID   72333597.
  22. ↑ Nicholson AA, Rabellino D, Densmore M, Frewen PA, Paret C, Kluetsch R, Schmahl C, Théberge J, Neufeld RW, McKinnon MC, Reiss JP, Jetly R, Lanius RA (January 2017). "The neurobiology of emotion regulation in posttraumatic stress disorder: Amygdala downregulation via real-time fMRI neurofeedback". Human Brain Mapping. 38 (1): 541–560. doi:10.1002/hbm.23402. ISSN   1065-9471. PMC   6866912 . PMID   27647695.
  23. ↑ Kohl SH, Mehler DM, Lührs M, Thibault RT, Konrad K, Sorger B (21 July 2020). "The Potential of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy-Based Neurofeedback—A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Best Practice". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14: 594. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00594 . ISSN   1662-453X. PMC   7396619 . PMID   32848528.
  24. ↑ Arns M, Clark CR, Trullinger M, deBeus R, Mack M, Aniftos M (June 2020). "Neurofeedback and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity-Disorder (ADHD) in Children: Rating the Evidence and Proposed Guidelines". Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 45 (2): 39–48. doi:10.1007/s10484-020-09455-2. ISSN   1090-0586. PMC   7250955 . PMID   32206963.
  25. ↑ Van Doren J, Arns M, Heinrich H, Vollebregt MA, Strehl U, K Loo S (March 2019). "Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis". European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 28 (3): 293–305. doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4. ISSN   1018-8827. PMC   6404655 . PMID   29445867.
  26. ↑ Krylova M, Skouras S, Razi A, Nicholson AA, Karner A, Steyrl D, Boukrina O, Rees G, Scharnowski F, Koush Y (3 December 2021). "Progressive modulation of resting-state brain activity during neurofeedback of positive-social emotion regulation networks". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 23363. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1123363K. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02079-4. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   8642545 . PMID   34862407.
  27. ↑ Sterman MB, Egner T (March 2006). "Foundation and Practice of Neurofeedback for the Treatment of Epilepsy". Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 31 (1): 21–35. doi:10.1007/s10484-006-9002-x. ISSN   1090-0586. PMID   16614940. S2CID   1445660.
  28. ↑ Monderer RS, Harrison DM, Haut SR (June 2002). "Neurofeedback and epilepsy". Epilepsy & Behavior. 3 (3): 214–218. doi:10.1016/S1525-5050(02)00001-X. PMID   12662600. S2CID   31198834.
  29. ↑ Van Doren J, Arns M, Heinrich H, Vollebregt MA, Strehl U, K Loo S (1 March 2019). "Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis". European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 28 (3): 293–305. doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4. ISSN   1435-165X. PMC   6404655 . PMID   29445867.
  30. ↑ Enriquez-Geppert S, Smit D, Pimenta MG, Arns M (28 May 2019). "Neurofeedback as a Treatment Intervention in ADHD: Current Evidence and Practice". Current Psychiatry Reports. 21 (6): 46. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1021-4. ISSN   1535-1645. PMC   6538574 . PMID   31139966.
  31. ↑ Dashbozorgi Z, Ghaffari A, Karamali Esmaili S, Ashoori J, Moradi A, Sarvghadi P (10 September 2021). "Effect of Neurofeedback Training on Aggression and Impulsivity in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial". Basic and Clinical Neuroscience. 12 (5): 693–702. doi:10.32598/bcn.2021.2363.1. PMC   8818111 . PMID   35173923. S2CID   237880490.
  32. ↑ Xiang M, Hou X, Liao B, Liao J, Hu M (1 May 2018). "The effect of neurofeedback training for sport performance in athletes: A meta-analysis". Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 36: 114–122. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.02.004. ISSN   1469-0292. S2CID   148988970.
  33. ↑ Cheng M, Wang K, Hung C, Tu Y, Huang C, Koester D, Schack T, Hung T (September 2017). "Higher power of sensorimotor rhythm is associated with better performance in skilled air-pistol shooters". Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 32: 47–53. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.05.007. S2CID   33780406.
  34. ↑ Birbaumer N, Ramos Murguialday A, Weber C, Montoya P (1 January 2009), "Chapter 8 Neurofeedback and Brain–Computer Interface: Clinical Applications", International Review of Neurobiology, Academic Press, 86: 107–117, doi:10.1016/s0074-7742(09)86008-x, PMID   19607994 , retrieved 28 April 2023
  35. ↑ Coben R, Hammond DC, Arns M (1 March 2019). "19 Channel Z-Score and LORETA Neurofeedback: Does the Evidence Support the Hype?". Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 44 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1007/s10484-018-9420-6. ISSN   1573-3270. PMC   6373269 . PMID   30255461.
  36. ↑ Dessy E, Mairesse O, van Puyvelde M, Cortoos A, Neyt X, Pattyn N (10 March 2020). "Train Your Brain? Can We Really Selectively Train Specific EEG Frequencies with Neurofeedback Training". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 14: 22. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00022 . PMC   7077336 . PMID   32210777.
  37. ↑ Bauer R, Vukelić M, Gharabaghi A (1 September 2016). "What is the optimal task difficulty for reinforcement learning of brain self-regulation?". Clinical Neurophysiology. 127 (9): 3033–3041. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2016.06.016. ISSN   1388-2457. PMID   27472538. S2CID   3686790.
  38. ↑ Thibault RT, Raz A (October 2017). "The psychology of neurofeedback: Clinical intervention even if applied placebo". American Psychologist. 72 (7): 679–688. doi:10.1037/amp0000118. ISSN   1935-990X. PMID   29016171. S2CID   4650115.
  39. ↑ Thibault RT, Lifshitz M, Birbaumer N, Raz A (2015). "Neurofeedback, Self-Regulation, and Brain Imaging: Clinical Science and Fad in the Service of Mental Disorders". Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 84 (4): 193–207. doi:10.1159/000371714. ISSN   0033-3190. PMID   26021883. S2CID   17750375.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.