Non-Registered Intermediary

Last updated

If a defendant in England and Wales is identified as being vulnerable, special measures can be taken to allow a non-registered intermediary to assist them during their trial. Around two thirds of all offenders have communication difficulties [1] and there is a high demand for non-registered intermediaries in the criminal courts. The first practical use of a defendant intermediary in a major trial is believed to be a murder case before a high court judge. [2] If an intermediary is to be used the court should then attempt to find an appropriate intermediary. HMCTS staff have been issued with guidance which includes the list of several professional organisations that may be able to assist in providing an intermediary. [3] The two largest providers of intermediaries for defendants in the criminal and family courts are Communicourt and Triangle

Contents

Intermediaries carry out a range of functions to assist the courts and criminal justice practitioners including:

The Difference Between Registered and Non-Registered Intermediaries

The Youth Justice & Criminal Evidence Act 1999 created the provision for a range of "Special Measures" for cases involving vulnerable and intimidated witnesses to give their best evidence in court, one of which is the intermediary special measure. [4] The Witness Intermediary Scheme (WIS) was set up by the Ministry of Justice’s Better Trials Unit to implement the intermediary special measure. The National Policing Improvement Agency operate and manage the WIS’s national database and matching service on behalf of the Ministry of Justice. Intermediaries appointed through the WIS will be Registered Intermediary, recruited, trained and accredited by the Ministry of Justice. RIs work through the Witness Intermediary Scheme, run by the Ministry of Justice, which maintains a register of intermediaries, providing training and matching them with witnesses or victims. The legislation currently excludes defendants from using RIs. Instead they have to rely on what the High Court called ‘private and unregulated’ helpers [5]

Vulnerable defendants frequently stand trial without the professional assistance they require. Defendants do not have access to the MoJ "Registered Intermediaries" but should still have access to high quality intermediaries with skills not only in assisting with evidence giving, but also in helping the defendant to understand the case against him/her, instruct his legal team, and participate in the trial.

Ground Rules Hearing

In preparation for trial, courts must take ‘every reasonable step’ to facilitate the participation of witnesses and defendants. One such step is the ground rules hearing: [6] A pre-trial meeting of the trial judge, trial advocates and intermediary with the aim of deciding how someone who has communication needs or is otherwise vulnerable should be enabled to give their best evidence, or how a vulnerable defendant can participate effectively in the trial. 'Ground rules' for questioning must be discussed between the court, the advocates and the intermediary before giving evidence. [7] GRHs are a form of case management hearing and discussion of ground rules is required in all intermediary trials. Intermediaries indicated [8] the most important matters which needed to be discussed at a GRH:

i. The recommendations in the intermediary report/ going through the questioning recommendations

ii. When, and how often, breaks should occur (for the vulnerable person)

iii. How and when the intermediary should intervene / get the judge’s attention if there is a communication issue

iv. How to introduce and use communication aids

v. Strategies to keep the vulnerable person calm and engaged

vi. The role of the intermediary

vii. The relevant materials from The Advocates Gateway

viii. When the vulnerable person will practice with the video link (if used)

ix. When the judge and counsel will meet the vulnerable witness

x. The need for flexibility e.g. to have another GRH if the situation changes

Intermediaries in Family Cases

The family courts are now more familiar in recent times with the concept of an intermediary being involved in cases where an individual may have Helping Individuals with Learning Disabilities. [9] In family cases, most intermediaries will be operating outside the WIS and in these circumstances they will be non-registered intermediaries. The intermediary should be matched according to their communication specialism, their availability and, if possible, their geographic location. [10] Funding must be agreed on a case-by-case basis as there is no standard procedure in Family Courts. Sometimes the cost of the intermediary is shared by the LAA, the court and the local authority. Sometimes it is funded solely by the court. Some intermediaries have reported a lack of clarity amongst practitioners about the role of the intermediary in family cases. [11]

In the matter of D (A Child) [2014] EWFC 39 [12] the President noted: ‘The mother and the father may require the use of an intermediary, not merely in the court setting but also, for example, when meeting professionals out of court'. Furthermore, with reference to the matter of A (A Child) [2013] EWHC 3502 [13] the legal representatives should normally by the date of the case management hearing identify an agency to assist their client to give evidence through an intermediary or otherwise if the court concludes that such measures are required. [14]

Communicourt Code of Practice for NRI's [15]

The primary responsibility of the Non-Registered Intermediary is to enable complete, coherent and accurate communication to take place between a defendant who requires special measures and the court

Non-Registered Intermediaries must have a clear and comprehensive understanding of the responsibilities and duties of their role within the criminal justice system, including their primary responsibility to the court

They must conduct themselves in court in a manner that facilitates accurate and coherent communication between the defendant and the court

They must respect at all times the authority and judgement of the court

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defendant</span> Accused person

In court proceedings, a defendant is a person or object who is the party either accused of committing a crime in criminal prosecution or against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case.

In a legal dispute, one party has the burden of proof to show that they are correct, while the other party has no such burden and is presumed to be correct. The burden of proof requires a party to produce evidence to establish the truth of facts needed to satisfy all the required legal elements of the dispute.

In law, a judgment, also spelled judgement, is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.

Public-interest immunity (PII), previously known as Crown privilege, is a principle of English common law under which the English courts can grant a court order allowing one litigant to refrain from disclosing evidence to the other litigants where disclosure would be damaging to the public interest. This is an exception to the usual rule that all parties in litigation must disclose any evidence that is relevant to the proceedings. In making a PII order, the court has to balance the public interest in the administration of justice and the public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of certain documents whose disclosure would be damaging. PII orders have been used in criminal law against large organised criminal outfits and drug dealers where the identity of paid police informants could be at risk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discovery (law)</span> Pre-trial procedure in common law countries for obtaining evidence

Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a pre-trial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from the other party or parties by means of discovery devices such as interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admissions and depositions. Discovery can be obtained from non-parties using subpoenas. When a discovery request is objected to, the requesting party may seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery.

An intermediary, also known as a middleman or go-between, is defined differently by context. In law or diplomacy, an intermediary is a third party that offers intermediation services between two parties. In trade or barter, an intermediary acts as a conduit for goods or services offered by a supplier to a consumer, which may include wholesalers, resellers, brokers, and various other services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courtroom</span> Enclosed space in which a judge regularly holds court

A courtroom is the enclosed space in which courts of law are held in front of a judge. A number of courtrooms, which may also be known as "courts", may be housed in a courthouse. In recent years, courtrooms have been equipped with audiovisual technology to permit everyone present to clearly hear testimony and see exhibits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magistrates' court (England and Wales)</span> Lower court in the criminal legal system of England and Wales

In England and Wales, a magistrates' court is a lower court which hears matters relating to summary offences and some triable either-way matters. Some civil law issues are also decided here, notably family proceedings. In 2010, there were 320 magistrates' courts in England and Wales; by 2020, a decade later, 164 of those had closed. The jurisdiction of magistrates' courts and rules governing them are set out in the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice Act 2003</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is a wide-ranging measure introduced to modernise many areas of the criminal justice system in England and Wales and, to a lesser extent, in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Large portions of the act were repealed and replaced by the Sentencing Act 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is concerned with criminal justice and concentrates upon legal protection and assistance to victims of crime, particularly domestic violence. It also expands the provision for trials without a jury, brings in new rules for trials for causing the death of a child or vulnerable adult, and permits bailiffs to use force to enter homes.

In English law, an appropriate adult is a parent, guardian or social worker; or if no person matching this is available, any responsible person over 18. The term was introduced as part of the policing reforms in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and applies in England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Sedley</span> British lawyer

Sir Stephen John Sedley is a British lawyer. He worked as a judge of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales from 1999 to 2011 and was a visiting professor at the University of Oxford from 2011 to 2015.

The right to silence in England and Wales is the protection given to a person during criminal proceedings from adverse consequences of remaining silent. It is sometimes referred to as the privilege against self-incrimination. It is used on any occasion when it is considered the person being spoken to is under suspicion of having committed one or more criminal offences and consequently thus potentially being subject to criminal proceedings.

Shahram Taghavi is a barrister practising in the United Kingdom. He is a specialist in Judicial Review, Human Rights, Immigration and EU law. He was called to the England & Wales bar in 1994. He is a partner at Article 1, a law firm specialising in immigration, EU freedoms of movement and human rights law. He practised as an independent barrister at Doughty Street Chambers specialising in human rights, immigration and public law. He was joint head of the Human Rights and Public law departments and head of the Immigration department at Simons Muirhead & Burton solicitors. He was a Senior Barrister at Bates Wells & Braithwaite LLP as a member of their Public & Regulatory, Human Rights and Immigration departments, Deputy Head of Human Rights and Immigration at Lewis Silkin LLP, Head of Human Rights and Immigration at Charles Russell LLP and National Head of Immigration and Human Rights at Grant Thornton LLP.

Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 W.L.R. 1489; [1954] 3 All E.R. 745 is an English Court of Appeal judgment, which established the criteria for the Court to accept fresh evidence in a case on which a judgment has already been delivered.

The role of expert witnesses in English law is to give explanations of difficult or technical topics in civil and criminal trials, to assist the fact finding process. The extent to which authorities have been allowed to testify, and on what topics, has been debated, and to this end a variety of criteria have evolved throughout English case law.

A Registered Intermediary, in England and Wales, assists in communication between lawyers and vulnerable witnesses in court cases. Many people attending court as victims or witnesses have difficulties understanding the questions that they are asked by lawyers. Registered Intermediaries have professional backgrounds in areas such as speech and language therapy, nursing, occupational therapy, education, or psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Communicourt</span>

Communicourt is a legal services company, based in Birmingham in the West Midlands, United Kingdom. It provides Non-Registered Intermediaries for defendants in criminal proceedings and respondents in family proceedings in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Post Office scandal</span> British legal and political scandal

The British Post Office scandal is a miscarriage of justice involving the wrongful civil and criminal prosecutions of an unknown or unpublished number of sub-postmasters (SPMs) for theft, false accounting and/or fraud. The cases constitute the most widespread miscarriage of justice in British legal history, spanning a period of over twenty years; aspects of the scandal remain unresolved.

<i>R v Jogee</i> 2016 British landmark legal case on joint enterprise

R v Jogee[2016] UKSC 8 was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that reversed previous case law on joint enterprise. The Supreme Court delivered its ruling jointly with the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which was considering an appeal from Jamaica, Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7.

References

  1. ↑ Professor Karen Bryan: Sheffield Hallam University IJLCD Winter Lecture,: Language Difficulties and Criminal Justice Processes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYFd3J6z_vI&sns=tw
  2. ↑ Joanna Lawrence - Gillian Frost: The use of Intermediaries (2012) http://www.communicourt.co.uk/gillian-frost-the-use-of-intermediaries/
  3. ↑ R v GP - In the Crown Court at Leeds: T2012 0409 http://www.communicourt.co.uk/r-v-gp/
  4. ↑ The Role of Intermediaries: AAC SIG 12 June 2008, slide 3 www.aacsig.org.uk/sites/default/files/.../the-role-of-the-intermediaries.ppt
  5. ↑ "High court rules vulnerable defendants deserve equal protection | News | Law Society Gazette". Archived from the original on 25 February 2015.
  6. ↑ The Advocates Gateway - Ground Rules Hearings: Planning to question a vulnerable person or someone with communication needs Toolkit 1(c) 21 October 2013 http://www.theadvocatesgateway.org/images/toolkits/1cGroundrules211013.pdf
  7. ↑ The Advocates Gateway: Responding to communication needs in the justice system http://www.theadvocatesgateway.org/intermediaries
  8. ↑ Highs and Lows: The 4th Intermediary Survey, Penny Cooper: Kingston University London July 2014 (updated 13 October 2014) http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/28868/1/Cooper_P-28868.pdf
  9. ↑ Case No: B4/2013/2048 & B4/2014/0198 Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWCA Civ 128 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION Re C (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 128
  10. ↑ The Advocate's Gateway: Vulnerable Witnesses and Parties in the Family Courts Toolkit 13, 8/11/2014 http://www.familylaw.co.uk/system/redactor_assets/documents/2029/13vulnerablewitnessesandpartiesinthefamilycourts081114.pdf
  11. ↑ Cooper, 2014: ‘Speaking when they are spoken to: hearing vulnerable witnesses in care proceedings’ CFLQ 26(2):132–51
  12. ↑ In the Family Court at Swindon, In the Matter of D (A Child) https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/re-child-d.pdf
  13. ↑ In the High Court of Justice Family Division Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 3502 (Fam) Case No: UW11C00045 http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed123147
  14. ↑ Re C (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 128 Case No: B4/2013/2048 & B4/2014/0198 Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWCA Civ 128 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION (HIS HONOUR JUDGE TURNER QC) paragraph 25
  15. ↑ Communicourt Code of Practice http://www.communicourt.co.uk/resources/code-of-practice/
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.