Oaths Act, 1873

Last updated

Oaths Act, 1873
Parliament-Ottawa.jpg
Parliament of Canada
  • An Act to provide for the examination of witnesses on Oath by Committees of the Senate and House of Commons, in certain cases
CitationS.C. 1873, c. 1
Enacted by Parliament of Canada
Royal assent May 3, 1873
DisallowedJuly 1, 1873
Legislative history
Bill citation2nd Parliament, 1st session
Introduced by John Hillyard Cameron
First reading April 18, 1873
Second reading April 21, 1873
Third reading April 21, 1873
Status: Disallowed

The Oaths Act, 1873, was a statute passed by the Parliament of Canada in 1873 which authorized any committee of the Senate or House of Commons to examine witnesses under oath.

Contents

The enactment was subsequently disallowed by the government of the United Kingdom as it was deemed ultra vires . The Oaths Act, 1873 is the only instance of an enactment of Canadian Parliament to be disallowed by the government of the United Kingdom.

Background

"Whither are we drifting?" Macdonald is shown triumphant at obtaining a prorogation in the wake of the Pacific Scandal, but is trampling a weeping Canada and apparently drunk with bottle in pocket in this August 1873 cartoon by John Wilson Bengough. Macdonald is depicted claiming clean hands, but with "Send me another $10,000" written on his palm. Whither are we drifting.png
"Whither are we drifting?" Macdonald is shown triumphant at obtaining a prorogation in the wake of the Pacific Scandal, but is trampling a weeping Canada and apparently drunk with bottle in pocket in this August 1873 cartoon by John Wilson Bengough. Macdonald is depicted claiming clean hands, but with "Send me another $10,000" written on his palm.

Pacific Sandal

The Pacific Scandal was a political scandal in 1870s Canada involving bribes accepted by 150 members of the Conservative government in the attempts of private interests to influence the bidding for a national rail contract.

Prime Minister John A. Macdonald had hoped to award the charter for the Canadian Pacific Railway in early 1872, but negotiations dragged on between the government and the financiers. Macdonald's government awarded the group led by Hugh Allan the charter in late 1872. In 1873, when Parliament opened, Liberal member of parliament Lucius Seth Huntington charged that government ministers had been bribed with large, undisclosed political contributions to award the charter. Documents soon came to light which substantiated what came to be known as the Pacific Scandal. The Allan-led financiers, who were secretly backed by the United States's Northern Pacific Railway, [1] had donated CA$179,000 to the Conservative Party election funds, they had received the charter, and Opposition newspapers began to publish telegrams signed by government ministers requesting large sums from the railway interest at the time the charter was under consideration. Macdonald had taken CA$45,000 in contributions from the railway interest himself. Substantial sums went to George-Étienne Cartier, who waged an expensive fight to try to retain his seat in Montreal East (he was defeated, but was subsequently returned for the Manitoba seat of Provencher). During the campaign Cartier had fallen ill with Bright's disease, which may have been causing his judgment to lapse; [2] he died in May 1873 while seeking treatment in London. [2]

Before Cartier's death, Macdonald attempted to use delay to extricate the government. [3] The Opposition responded by leaking documents to friendly newspapers. On July 18, three papers published a telegram dated August 1872 from Macdonald requesting another $10,000 and promising "it will be the last time of asking". [4] Macdonald was able to get a prorogation of Parliament in August by appointing a Royal Commission to look into the matter.

Liberal member of the House of Commons for Shefford Lucius Seth Huntington put forward a motion to form a parliamentary committee to investigate the Pacific Scandal, and gave a slow outline of his charges in the house. [5] Historian Donald Creighton describes Huntington's speech as an inflammatory, and designed to provoke conservative ministers into debate, which was unsuccessful as Macdonald made no statements and required silenced from his party. [6] Huntington's motion was regarded by the house as a confidence vote and was rejected by the Conservative-dominated house 76—107. [7] [6] Macdonald relented and appointed a five-member committee to investigate the allegations the next day, [8] with conservative member of the House of Commons for Cardwell John Hillyard Cameron appointed to chair the committee investigating the Pacific Scandal. [5] [9] Cameron himself had received $5,000 from Allan to finance his campaign in the 1872 election, and was regarded with suspicion by the Liberal members of parliament. [9] The two other conservative members were Joseph-Goderic Blanchet and James McDonald, and the liberal members were Edward Blake and Antoine-Aimé Dorion. [5]

Provisions

The Oaths Act was introduced, and given its first reading in the 2nd Parliament on April 18, 1873, by John Hillyard Cameron. [10] The bill was quickly passed the House of Commons with the second and third readings occurring days later on April 21. [11] The bill subsequently passed the Senate without amendment a few days later on April 29. [12] Governor General Frederick Temple Blackwood provided royal assent on May 3, 1873. [13]

The Oaths Act was short and included only four sections. The first section permitted a committee of the Senate or House of Commons to examine a witness under oath. The second section permitted the oath to be administered by the chairman of the committee. The third section provided that a witness who provided false evidence was subject to the penalties of perjury. The fourth section provided the text of the oath.

Section 4: The oath or affirmation aforesaid shall be in the following form: "The evidence you shall give on this examination shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help you God."

Disallowance

John Wodehouse, 1st Earl of Kimberley recommended the Oaths Act be disallowed as outside the competency of Parliament. Portrait of John Wodehouse, 1st Earl of Kimberley.jpg
John Wodehouse, 1st Earl of Kimberley recommended the Oaths Act be disallowed as outside the competency of Parliament.

Following the passage of the Oaths Act on April 30, 1873, in his role as minister of justice, John A. Macdonald wrote the government of the United Kingdom noting the bill had been passed and questioned whether Parliament had the authority to pass such a bill. Macdonald stated his conclusion "...although not without doubt, that this bill is not within the competency or jurisdiction of the Canadian Parliament". [14] Governor General Lord Dufferin also provided noted his concern over the bill, but noted he chose to provide royal assent based on the precedent of a previous bill passed in 1868 which provided the authority for the Senate to question witnesses at the bar, which was not a power granted to the British House of Commons. [15] Dufferin felt he could not withhold royal assent with the previous precedent in place, and he also noted the immense controversy of the Pacific Scandal on the Macdonald government and their willingness to pass the Act. [15] Dufferin also sought an opinion from parliamentary scholar Alpheus Todd, which assured him Canadian Parliament had the authority to pass the Oaths Act. [16]

In his response Secretary of State for the Colonies Earl Kimberley, noted that he had sought legal advice and found the Oaths Actultra vires of the British North America Act, 1867 , and recommended the disallowance of the enactment, which occurred on July 1, 1873. [17] Earl Kimberley also noted the Act passed in 1868 which provided the Senate with the authority to question witnesses at the bar "escaped observation" and should have been disallowed, but noted those provisions are inoperative as they are repugnant of the provisions of the British North America Act, 1867. [17]

Aftermath

Macdonald government

Alexander Mackenzie became the Prime Minister following the fall of the Macdonald government. Alexander MacKenzie - portrait.jpg
Alexander Mackenzie became the Prime Minister following the fall of the Macdonald government.

When Parliament reconvened in late October 1873, the Liberals, feeling Macdonald could be defeated over the issue, applied immense pressure to wavering members. [18] On November 3, Macdonald rose in the Commons to defend the government, and according to one of his biographers, P. B. Waite, he gave "the speech of his life, and, in a sense, for his life". [19] He began his speech at 9 p.m., looking frail and ill, an appearance which quickly improved. As he spoke, he consumed numerous glasses of gin and water. He denied that there had been a corrupt bargain, and stated that such contributions were common to both political parties. After five hours, Macdonald concluded,

I leave it with this House with every confidence. I am equal to either fortune. I can see past the decision of this House either for or against me, but whether it be against me or for me, I know, and it is no vain boast to say so, for even my enemies will admit that I am no boaster, that there does not exist in Canada a man who has given more of his time, more of his heart, more of his wealth, or more of his intellect and power, as it may be, for the good of this Dominion of Canada. [19]

Macdonald's speech was seen as a personal triumph, but it did little to salvage the fortunes of his government. With eroding support both in the Commons and among the public, Macdonald went to the Governor General, Lord Dufferin on November 5, and resigned; Liberal leader Alexander Mackenzie became the second prime minister of Canada. [20] He is not known to have spoken of the events of the Pacific Scandal again. [21]

On November 6, 1873, Macdonald offered his resignation as party leader to his caucus; it was refused. Mackenzie called an election for January 1874; the Conservatives were reduced to 70 seats out of the 206 in the Commons, giving Mackenzie a massive majority. [22] The Conservatives bested the Liberals only in British Columbia; Mackenzie had called the terms by which the province had joined Confederation "impossible". [23] Macdonald was returned in Kingston but was unseated on an election contest when bribery was proven; he won the ensuing by-election by 17 votes. According to Swainson, most observers viewed Macdonald as finished in politics, "a used-up and dishonoured man". [24]

Disallowance of legislation in Canada

Section 18 of the British North America Act was subsequently amended by the Parliament of the United Kingdom with the Parliament of Canada Act, 1875. Canadian Parliament was provided with the same privileges afforded the Parliament of the United Kingdom, including the authority to examine witnesses under oath. The Canadian Parliament subsequently passed a new Oaths Act in 1875. [25] [26]

Political scientist Andrew Heard argues that disallowance of federal law has been effectively forbidden by constitutional convention in Canada since 1942 when the Governor General was no longer permitted to forward Acts of Canadian Parliament to the government of the United Kingdom. [27] As the Constitution Act provides the government of the United Kingdom with two years to disallow an enactment upon receipt of an official copy of the legislation, an Act of Canadian Parliament cannot be disallowed under section 56 as it can not be received by the British government. [27] This constitutional convention was reinforced with the Letters Patent, 1947 , removing the Governor General's responsibility to forward official copies of legislation to the government of the United Kingdom, and the subsequent repeal of The Publication of Statutes Act. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexander Mackenzie (politician)</span> Prime minister of Canada from 1873 to 1878

Alexander Mackenzie was a Canadian politician who served as the second prime minister of Canada, in office from 1873 to 1878.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John A. Macdonald</span> Prime minister of Canada from 1867 to 1873 and 1878 to 1891

Sir John Alexander Macdonald was the first prime minister of Canada, serving from 1867 to 1873 and from 1878 to 1891. He was the dominant figure of Canadian Confederation, and had a political career that spanned almost half a century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacific Scandal</span>

The Pacific Scandal was a political scandal in Canada involving large sums of money being paid by private interests to the Conservative government to cover election expenses in the 1872 Canadian federal election, to influence the bidding for a national rail contract. As part of British Columbia's 1871 agreement to join the Canadian Confederation, the federal government had agreed to build a transcontinental railway linking the seaboard of British Columbia to the eastern provinces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Confederation</span> 1867 unification of Province of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick

Canadian Confederation was the process by which three British North American provinces—the Province of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick—were united into one federation called the Dominion of Canada, on July 1, 1867. Upon Confederation, Canada consisted of four provinces: Ontario and Quebec, which had been split out from the Province of Canada, and the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Over the years since Confederation, Canada has seen numerous territorial changes and expansions, resulting in the current number of ten provinces and three territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Cockburn (Ontario politician)</span> Politician and father of Canadian Confederation (1819–1883)

James W. Cockburn was a Canadian Conservative politician, and a father of Canadian Confederation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1873 in Canada</span> Canada-related events during the year of 1873

Events from the year 1873 in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conservative Party of Canada (1867–1942)</span> Right-of-centre political party in Canada

The Conservative Party of Canada has gone by a variety of names over the years since Canadian Confederation. Initially known as the "Liberal-Conservative Party", it dropped "Liberal" from its name in 1873, although many of its candidates continued to use this name.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1867 Canadian federal election</span>

The 1867 Canadian federal election was held from August 7 to September 20, 1867, and was the first election for the new country of Canada. It was held to elect members representing electoral districts in the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Ontario and Quebec to the House of Commons of the 1st Canadian Parliament. The provinces of Manitoba (1870) and British Columbia (1871) were created during the term of the 1st Parliament of Canada and were not part of this election.

The Liberal-Conservative Party was the formal name of the Conservative Party of Canada until 1873, and again from 1922 to 1938, although some Conservative candidates continued to run under the label as late as the 1911 election and others ran as simple Conservatives before 1873. In many of Canada's early elections, there were both "Liberal-Conservative" and "Conservative" candidates; however, these were simply different labels used by candidates of the same party. Both were part of Sir John A. Macdonald's government and official Conservative and Liberal-Conservative candidates would not, generally, run against each other. It was also common for a candidate to run on one label in one election and the other in a subsequent election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Mitchell (politician)</span> Canadian Father of Confederation

Peter Mitchell was a Canadian politician and one of the Fathers of Confederation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1874 Canadian federal election</span>

The 1874 Canadian federal election was held on January 22, 1874, to elect members of the House of Commons of Canada of the 3rd Parliament of Canada. Sir John A. Macdonald, who had recently been forced out of office as prime minister, and his Conservatives were defeated by the Liberal Party under their new leader Prime Minister Alexander Mackenzie.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph-Goderic Blanchet</span> Canadian politician

Joseph-Goderic (Joseph-Godric) Blanchet, was a Canadian physician and politician. He was the only person to serve as both Speaker of the House of Commons of Canada and Speaker of a provincial legislature. He represented Lévis in the House of Commons of Canada as a Liberal-Conservative member from 1867 to 1873 and from 1879 to 1883; he represented Bellechasse from 1875 to 1878. He also represented Lévis in the Legislative Assembly of Quebec from 1867 to 1875.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antoine-Aimé Dorion</span> Canadian politician

Sir Antoine-Aimé Dorion was a French Canadian politician and jurist.

Disallowance and reservation are historical constitutional powers that were instituted in several territories throughout the British Empire as a mechanism to delay or overrule legislation. Originally created to preserve the Crown's authority over colonial governments, these powers are now generally considered politically obsolete, and in many cases have been formally abolished.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Dewey Day</span> Canadian lawyer, politician and judge (1806–1884)

Charles Dewey Day, was a lawyer, judge and political figure in Lower Canada and Canada East. He was a member of the Special Council of Lower Canada, which governed Lower Canada after the Lower Canada Rebellions in 1837 and 1838. He was elected to the first Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada in 1841, but resigned in 1842 to accept an appointment to the Court of Queen's Bench of Lower Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Post-Confederation Canada (1867–1914)</span>

Post-Confederation Canada (1867–1914) is history of Canada from the formation of the Dominion to the outbreak of World War I in 1914. Canada had a population of 3.5 million, residing in the large expanse from Cape Breton to just beyond the Great Lakes, usually within a hundred miles or so of the Canada–United States border. One in three Canadians was French, and about 100,000 were aboriginal. It was a rural country composed of small farms. With a population of 115,000, Montreal was the largest city, followed by Toronto and Quebec at about 60,000. Pigs roamed the muddy streets of Ottawa, the small new national capital.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter McLaren (politician)</span> Canadian politician

Peter McLaren was a Canadian politician and Senator from Ontario. McLaren was the Plaintiff in McLaren v Caldwell, that resulted in the landmark decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council that upheld provincial jurisdiction in matters of a local or private nature, as well as over property and civil rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral history of John A. Macdonald</span> Electoral history of Prime Minister Macdonald

This article is the Electoral history of Sir John A. Macdonald, the first Prime Minister of Canada.

<i>Electoral Franchise Act</i> 1885 Canadian statute

The Electoral Franchise Act, 1885 was a federal statute that regulated elections in Canada for a brief period in the late 19th century. The act was in force from 1885, when it was passed by John A. Macdonald's Conservative majority; to 1898, when Wilfrid Laurier's Liberals repealed it. The Electoral Franchise Act restricted the vote to propertied men over 21. It excluded women, Indigenous people west of Ontario, and those designated "Chinese" or "Mongolian".

Disallowance and reservation are historical constitutional powers in Canada that act as a mechanism to delay or overrule legislation passed by Parliament or a provincial legislature. In contemporary Canadian history, disallowance is an authority granted to the governor general in council to invalidate an act passed by a provincial legislature. Reservation is an authority granted to the lieutenant governor to withhold royal assent from a bill which has been passed by a provincial legislature; the bill is then "reserved" for consideration by the federal cabinet.

References

  1. ↑ Gwyn 2011, p. 200.
  2. 1 2 Swainson 1989, pp. 97–100.
  3. ↑ Creighton 1955, p. 156.
  4. ↑ Waite 1975, p. 103.
  5. 1 2 3 Creighton 1955, pp. 153–154.
  6. 1 2 Creighton 1955, p. 153.
  7. ↑ Hodgins 1896, pp. 14–17.
  8. ↑ Creighton 1955, p. 154.
  9. 1 2 Swainson, Donald (1972). "Cameron, John Hillyard". In Hayne, David (ed.). Dictionary of Canadian Biography . Vol. X (1871–1880) (online ed.). University of Toronto Press.
  10. ↑ House of Commons of Canada 1873, p. 175.
  11. ↑ House of Commons of Canada 1873, p. 183.
  12. ↑ House of Commons of Canada 1873, p. 229.
  13. ↑ House of Commons of Canada 1873, p. 265.
  14. ↑ Hodgins 1896, pp. 13–14.
  15. 1 2 Hodgins 1896, pp. 14–16.
  16. ↑ Hodgins 1896, pp. 16–17.
  17. 1 2 Hodgins 1896, pp. 17–18.
  18. ↑ Waite 1975, pp. 103–104.
  19. 1 2 Waite 1975, pp. 105–106.
  20. ↑ Swainson 1989, pp. 102–103.
  21. ↑ Gwyn 2011, p. 255.
  22. ↑ Creighton 1955, pp. 180–183.
  23. ↑ Gwyn 2011, p. 256.
  24. ↑ Swainson 1989, p. 104.
  25. ↑ Robert & Armitage 2007, p. 31.
  26. ↑ Parliament of Canada Act, 1875, 38-39 Vict., c. 38 (U.K.)
  27. 1 2 3 Heard 2015, p. 339.
Bibliography
Primary Sources
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.