Oblique wing

Last updated
Oblique wing on a NASA AD-1 NASA AD-1 in flight.jpg
Oblique wing on a NASA AD-1

An oblique wing (also called a slewed wing) is a variable geometry wing concept. On an aircraft so equipped, the wing is designed to rotate on center pivot, so that one tip is swept forward while the opposite tip is swept aft. By changing its sweep angle in this way, drag can be reduced at high speed (with the wing swept) without sacrificing low speed performance (with the wing perpendicular). This is a variation on the classic swing-wing design, intended to simplify construction and retain the center of gravity as the sweep angle is changed.

Contents

History

The oldest examples of this technology are the unrealized German aircraft projects Blohm & Voss P.202 and Messerschmitt Me P.1009-01 from the year 1944, based on a Messerschmitt patent. [1] [2] After the war, constructor Dr. Richard Vogt was brought to the US during Operation Paperclip. [3] The oblique wing concept was resurrected by Robert T. Jones in the 1950s, [4] an aeronautical engineer at the NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California. Analytical and wind tunnel studies initiated by Jones at Ames indicated that a transport-size oblique-wing aircraft, flying at speeds up to Mach 1.4 (1.4 times the speed of sound), would have substantially better aerodynamic performance than aircraft with more conventional wings.

In the 1970s, an unmanned propeller-driven aircraft was constructed and tested at Moffett Field. [5] Known as the NASA Oblique Wing, the project pointed out a craft's unpleasant characteristics at large sweep angles.

So far, only one manned aircraft, the NASA AD-1, has been built to explore this concept. It flew a series of flight tests starting in 1979. This aircraft demonstrated a number of serious roll-coupling modes and further experimentation ended.

Theory

The general approach is to design an aircraft that performs with high efficiency as the Mach number increases from takeoff to cruise conditions (M ~ 0.8, for a commercial aircraft). Since two different types of drag dominate in each of these two flight regimes, uniting high performance designs for each regime into a single airframe is problematic.

At low Mach numbers induced drag dominates drag concerns. Airplanes during takeoff and gliders are most concerned with induced drag. One way to reduce induced drag is to increase the effective wingspan of the lifting surface. This is why gliders have such long, narrow wings. An ideal wing has infinite span and induced drag is reduced to a two–dimensional property. At lower speeds, during takeoffs and landings, an oblique wing would be positioned perpendicular to the fuselage like a conventional wing to provide maximum lift and control qualities. As the aircraft gained speed, the wing would be pivoted to increase the oblique angle, thereby reducing the drag due to wetted area, and decreasing fuel consumption.

Alternatively, at Mach numbers increasing towards the speed of sound and beyond, wave drag dominates design concerns. As the aircraft displaces the air, a sonic wave is generated. Sweeping the wings away from the nose of the aircraft can keep the wings aft of the sonic wave, greatly reducing drag. Unfortunately, for a given wing design, increasing sweep decreases the aspect ratio. At high speeds, both subsonic and supersonic, an oblique wing would be pivoted at up to 60 degrees to the aircraft's fuselage for better high-speed performance. The studies showed these angles would decrease aerodynamic drag, permitting increased speed and longer range with the same fuel expenditure.

Fundamentally, it appears that no design can be completely optimised for both flight regimes. However, the oblique wing shows promise of getting close. By actively increasing sweep as Mach number increases, high efficiency is possible for a wide range of speeds.

Robert T. Jones theorised that an oblique flying wing could drastically improve commercial air transportation, reducing fuel costs and noise in the vicinity of airports. [6] Military operations include the possibility of a long–endurance fighter/attack vehicle.

NASA OFW airliner research

There have been investigations into an OFW platform being developed into a transcontinental airliner. [7] NASA Ames performed a preliminary design study of a theoretical 500-seat supersonic airliner using the concept in 1991. Following this study, NASA built a small remote-controlled demonstrator aircraft with a 20-foot (6.1m) wingspan. It flew only once, for four minutes in May 1994, but in doing so, it demonstrated stable flight with oblique wing sweep from 35 degrees to 50 degrees. Despite this success, the NASA High Speed Research program, and further oblique wing studies, were canceled.

DARPA Oblique Flying-Wing (OFW) Project

The United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) awarded Northrop Grumman a $10.3 million (USD) contract for risk reduction and preliminary planning for an X-plane OFW demonstrator, [8] known as the Switchblade. That program was eventually cancelled, citing difficulties with control systems.

The program aimed at producing a technology demonstrator aircraft to explore the various challenges which the radical design entails. The proposed aircraft would be a pure flying wing (an aircraft with no other auxiliary surfaces such as tails, canards or a fuselage) where the wing is swept with one side of the aircraft forward, and one backwards in an asymmetric fashion. [9] This aircraft configuration is believed to give it a combination of high speed, long range and long endurance. [10] The program entailed two phases. Phase I was to explore the theory and result in a conceptual design, while Phase II covered the design, manufacture and flight test of an aircraft. The program hoped to produce a dataset that can then be used when considering future military aircraft designs.

Wind tunnel tests for the aircraft design were completed. The design was noted to be "workable and robust." [11] The program was concluded before a flight demonstrator was constructed. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area rule</span> Aerodynamic concept

The Whitcomb area rule, named after NACA engineer Richard Whitcomb and also called the transonic area rule, is a design procedure used to reduce an aircraft's drag at transonic speeds which occur between about Mach 0.75 and 1.2. For supersonic speeds a different procedure called the supersonic area rule, developed by NACA aerodynamicist Robert Jones, is used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta wing</span> Triangle shaped aircraft wing configuration

A delta wing is a wing shaped in the form of a triangle. It is named for its similarity in shape to the Greek uppercase letter delta (Δ).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flying wing</span> Tailless fixed-wing aircraft that has no definite fuselage

A flying wing is a tailless fixed-wing aircraft that has no definite fuselage, with its crew, payload, fuel, and equipment housed inside the main wing structure. A flying wing may have various small protuberances such as pods, nacelles, blisters, booms, or vertical stabilizers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swept wing</span> Plane wing that angles backwards or forwards

A swept wing is a wing angled either backward or occasionally forward from its root rather than perpendicular to the fuselage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transonic</span> Flight condition in which airflow speeds are concurrently above and below the speed of sound

Transonic flow is air flowing around an object at a speed that generates regions of both subsonic and supersonic airflow around that object. The exact range of speeds depends on the object's critical Mach number, but transonic flow is seen at flight speeds close to the speed of sound, typically between Mach 0.8 and 1.2.

In aeronautics, wave drag is a component of the aerodynamic drag on aircraft wings and fuselage, propeller blade tips and projectiles moving at transonic and supersonic speeds, due to the presence of shock waves. Wave drag is independent of viscous effects, and tends to present itself as a sudden and dramatic increase in drag as the vehicle increases speed to the critical Mach number. It is the sudden and dramatic rise of wave drag that leads to the concept of a sound barrier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aspect ratio (aeronautics)</span> Ratio of an aircrafts wing span to its mean chord

In aeronautics, the aspect ratio of a wing is the ratio of its span to its mean chord. It is equal to the square of the wingspan divided by the wing area. Thus, a long, narrow wing has a high aspect ratio, whereas a short, wide wing has a low aspect ratio.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Variable-sweep wing</span> Airplane wings capable of changing position to alter their geometry

A variable-sweep wing, colloquially known as a "swing wing", is an airplane wing, or set of wings, that may be swept back and then returned to its original straight position during flight. It allows the aircraft's shape to be modified in flight, and is therefore an example of a variable-geometry aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grumman X-29</span> 1984 experimental aircraft family by Grumman

The Grumman X-29 was an American experimental aircraft that tested a forward-swept wing, canard control surfaces, and other novel aircraft technologies. The X-29 was developed by Grumman, and the two built were flown by NASA and the United States Air Force. The aerodynamic instability of the X-29's airframe required the use of computerized fly-by-wire control. Composite materials were used to control the aeroelastic divergent twisting experienced by forward-swept wings, and to reduce weight. The aircraft first flew in 1984, and two X-29s were flight tested through 1991.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Thomas Jones (engineer)</span> American engineer

Robert T. Jones,, was an American aerodynamicist and aeronautical engineer for NACA and later NASA. He was known at NASA as "one of the premier aeronautical engineers of the twentieth century".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supercritical airfoil</span> Airfoil designed primarily to delay the onset of wave drag in the transonic speed range

A supercritical aerofoil is an airfoil designed primarily to delay the onset of wave drag in the transonic speed range.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supersonic aircraft</span> Aircraft that travels faster than the speed of sound

A supersonic aircraft is an aircraft capable of supersonic flight, that is, flying faster than the speed of sound. Supersonic aircraft were developed in the second half of the twentieth century. Supersonic aircraft have been used for research and military purposes, but only two supersonic aircraft, the Tupolev Tu-144 and the Concorde, ever entered service for civil use as airliners. Fighter jets are the most common example of supersonic aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forward-swept wing</span> Aircraft wing configuration

A forward-swept wing or reverse-swept wing is an aircraft wing configuration in which the quarter-chord line of the wing has a forward sweep. Typically, the leading edge also sweeps forward.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northrop Grumman Switchblade</span> American oblique wing UAV project

The Northrop Grumman Switchblade was a proposed variable sweep oblique wing unmanned aerial vehicle studied by Northrop Grumman for the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NASA AD-1</span> NASA experimental oblique wing aircraft

The NASA AD-1 was both an aircraft and an associated flight test program conducted between 1979 and 1982 at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards California, which successfully demonstrated an aircraft wing that could be pivoted obliquely from zero to 60 degrees during flight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canard (aeronautics)</span> Aircraft configuration in which a small wing is placed in front of the main wing

In aeronautics, a canard is a wing configuration in which a small forewing or foreplane is placed forward of the main wing of a fixed-wing aircraft or a weapon. The term "canard" may be used to describe the aircraft itself, the wing configuration, or the foreplane. Canard wings are also extensively used in guided missiles and smart bombs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tailless aircraft</span> Aircraft whose only horizontal aerodynamic surface is its main wing

In aeronautics, a tailless aircraft is an aircraft with no other horizontal aerodynamic surface besides its main wing. It may still have a fuselage, vertical tail fin, and/or vertical rudder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wing configuration</span> Describes the general shape and layout of an aircraft wing

The wing configuration of a fixed-wing aircraft is its arrangement of lifting and related surfaces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trapezoidal wing</span> Aircraft wing shape

In aeronautics, a trapezoidal wing is a straight-edged and tapered wing planform. It may have any aspect ratio and may or may not be swept.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thickness-to-chord ratio</span> Ratio in aeronautics

In aeronautics, the thickness-to-chord ratio, sometimes simply chord ratio or thickness ratio, compares the maximum vertical thickness of a wing to its chord. It is a key measure of the performance of a wing planform when it is operating at transonic speeds.

References

  1. Heinzerling, Werner. "Flügelpfeilung und Flächenregel, zwei grundlegende deutsche Patente der Flugzeugaerodynamik" [Wing Sweep and Area Rule, two German basic patents of aircraft aerodynamics](PDF) (in German). TU Darmstadt. pp. 7, 8.
  2. Meier, H.-U. "German development of the Swept Wing 1935-1945" (PDF). HAW-Hamburg.de .
  3. "History of Aerodynamics and Aircraft Design". Scientists & Friends.
  4. Could This Change Air Travel Forever?. Mustard. 5 January 2024. Retrieved 2024-01-06 via YouTube.
  5. "Wing-Twister". Air and Space magazine . 2014-10-06. Archived from the original on 2014-10-08 via Wayback Machine. NASA tested the Oblique Wing Research Aircraft in the late 1970s. Its unpleasant flying characteristics at extreme wing-sweep angles discouraged researchers.
  6. Jones, Robert T. (1977-01-01). "The oblique wing—aircraft design for transonic and low supersonic speeds". Acta Astronautica. 4 (1): 99–109. doi:10.1016/0094-5765(77)90035-2. ISSN   0094-5765.
  7. "Michael Williams blog". Archived from the original on 2006-10-09.
  8. Warwick, G. "<missing>". Flight International . 169 (5029): 20.
  9. "Oblique Flying Wing". DARPA.mil . Archived from the original on 2006-04-21.
  10. "Oblique Flying Wing, Supersonic Aerodynamics". Aerodyn.org . Archived from the original on 2006-05-14.
  11. "New Angles: Wind tunnel results point way forward for tailless oblique flying wing study". Aviation Week & Space Technology : 34–35. October 8, 2007.
  12. Shachtman, Noah. "Darpa Kills Shape-Shifting, Supersonic Bomber". Wired.com . ISSN   1059-1028 . Retrieved 2024-01-13.

Further reading