Operation Burnt Frost

Last updated
Operation Burnt Frost
SM-3 intercepting NROL-21-20080220.jpg
Break up of USA-193 following interception
ObjectiveDestruction of non-functioning satellite USA-193
Date4 January – 21 February 2008
Executed by USS Lake Erie
OutcomeSatellite destroyed on 21 February 2008

Operation Burnt Frost was a military operation to intercept and destroy non-functioning U.S. National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) satellite USA-193. [1] The mission was described by the Missile Defense Agency as a "mission of safeguarding human life against the uncontrolled re-entry of a 5,000-pound satellite containing over 1,000 pounds of hazardous hydrazine propellant". [2] The launch occurred on 21 February 2008 at approximately 10:26 p.m. EST from the USS Lake Erie, using a heavily modified Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) to shoot down the satellite. A few minutes after launch, the SM-3 intercepted its target and successfully completed its mission. [2] The operation received scrutiny from other countries, mainly China and Russia. [3]

Contents

NRO satellite

USA-193, also known as NRO launch 21 (NROL-21 or simply L-21), was an American military reconnaissance satellite launched on December 14, 2006. The USA-193 was owned by the NRO and its precise function and purpose are classified. Several websites speculate that the satellite was probably a high-resolution radar satellite intended to produce images for the NRO. [4] [5] [6] This argument is additionally supported by the fact that the satellite used a similar inclination to that of a Lacrosse Radar Satellite. [6] Lacrosse is a terrestrial radar imaging reconnaissance satellite operated by the NRO. It utilizes a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) to acquire high resolution images regardless of cloud cover. [6]

The satellite was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base at 1 p.m. PST aboard the Delta II space launch system. [7] This marked the first launch conducted by the United Launch Alliance since it assumed the program from Boeing Integrated Defense Systems on December 1, 2006. The successful launch represented a record 49 successful consecutive operational launches for the Defense Department. [7]

While the launch was successful, ground controllers lost control over the USA-193 satellite shortly after it was established on its orbit, and were unable to regain control. The satellite itself posed minimal risk of falling and causing damage. The satellite's hydrazine was claimed to pose environmental risks due to its toxicity [4] though no hydrazine pollution has ever been recorded due to a satellite reentry. In 2008, President George W. Bush determined that the satellite's fuel could potentially cause environmental damage if released, and asked the United States Strategic Command to destroy it. [2]

Timeline

Launch of the SM-3 missile that intercepted USA-193 on 20 February 2008 SM-3 launch to destroy the NRO-L 21 satellite.jpg
Launch of the SM-3 missile that intercepted USA-193 on 20 February 2008

From inception to the successful interception of the satellite, the timeline spanned only a matter of months. [8]

Discussions around the possibility of destroying USA-193 began as early as December 2007. [8] [9] However, Operation Burnt Frost started on 4 January 2008, when President Bush ordered the military to destroy the satellite. [8] [9]

On 27 January 2008, information about the orbital decay of USA-193 was given to the media. [8] Several of the initial reports projected that the satellite would return to Earth sometime in late February, early March. Additionally, these reports suggested that likely no action would need to be taken as the satellite or any debris would have a small chance of hitting any inhabited area. [10] [11] However, White House National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe, did mention that the U.S. government was monitoring the satellite's decay and that it was examining different options to “mitigate any damage”. Also, four anonymous U.S. Officials did report that the satellite, which never became operational, would have toxic rocket fuel (hydrazine fuel) that could pose a danger if the tank did not explode on re-entry. [10]

On 14 February 2008 General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made a public announcement that the U.S. intended to shoot down USA-193. In this announcement he laid out several criteria into when, how and why the satellite would be shot down. The major objective was to reduce the risk to space, air and terrestrial platforms. He explained that they would wait for the shuttle to land, so the potential harm to the shuttle would not be a factor. Next they wanted to wait until the satellite was close to re-entry, this would limit the amount of space debris created. Finally, they did not want to let the satellite enter the Earth's atmosphere because of its non-aerodynamic characteristics, which would make it extremely hard to intercept. He suggested that these criteria gave them an eight-day window. [12] [13]

Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Marine Gen. James E. Cartwright (left), and Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon R. England follow the progress of the SM-3 Cartwright and England follow the progress of USA 193.jpg
Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Marine Gen. James E. Cartwright (left), and Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon R. England follow the progress of the SM-3

To meet the flexibility of this operation the government established that the U.S. Navy and the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) would be the best option. It had the ability to be a mobile asset and by utilizing the SM-3 (Standard Missile 3) it would have the ability to reach the necessary altitude. [12] In addition the choice to use Aegis BMD was in large part due to its successful track record, in which 13 of 15 attempts to shoot down ballistic missiles were successful. [2]

General Cartwright stated that if the satellite came down in one piece that nearly one half of the spacecraft would survive re-entry, which would spread the toxic cloud of hydrazine gas roughly over the size of two football fields. [14] This potential risk seemed high enough to prompt the government and military to act as he stated “the regret factor of acting clearly outweighed the regret factor of not acting". [12]

Days prior to the launch the USS Lake Erie (primary) and USS Decatur (backup) sailed several hundred miles northwest of Hawaii to their rendezvous point. The USS Lake Erie was chosen because she was the U.S. Navy's most experienced ballistic-missile killer. The USS Russell was also a backup but remained in port at Pearl Harbor. [2]

By 19 February 2008, the satellite had decayed down to a 244 km × 261 km orbit, [15] an accelerating drop of approximately 10 km since the previous week. [16]

Most of the 174 identified space debris reentered by end of June 2008 Apoapsis of USA-193 debris.svg
Most of the 174 identified space debris reentered by end of June 2008

On 20 February 2008, at 1:00 p.m. EST Secretary of Defense Gates, with consultation of the White House, approved the mission. The launch happened at 10:26 p.m. EST and the collision with the satellite happened a few minutes later. [2]

On 25 February 2008, the Department of Defense announced that based on debris analysis, that the objective of destroying the hydrazine tank and reduction, if not elimination, of the risk to people on Earth was achieved. [17]

That test produced 174 pieces of orbital debris that were cataloged by the U.S. military. [18] While most of the debris re-entered the Earth's atmosphere within a few months, two pieces lasted slightly longer because they were thrown into higher orbits. The final tracked piece of USA-193 debris (COSPAR 2006-057GH, SATCAT 35425) re-entered 20 months later on 28 October 2009. [18]

Aftermath

Following the operation, China and Russia criticized the U.S. operation. The destruction of USA-193 came just weeks after Russia had drafted a new treaty to ban space weapons which was backed by China at a UN-sponsored forum. This treaty would ban the use of weapons against satellites or other spacecraft. [19] This prompted the Russians to accuse the United States of using the hydrazine gas as a cover-up to test an anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon. They claimed that several countries’ satellites which used toxic fuel have crashed into the Earth in the past but never warranted such “extraordinary measures”. [20] Furthering this notion, others have speculated that the toxic gas would have likely not survived re-entry regardless, and even if it had that the risk would be extremely small. [20] [21] These speculations have led many to believe that Operation Burnt Frost was in response to China's ASAT test on 11 January 2007 and to fear this would begin another "space race". [3] [22]

Unnamed U.S. officials continued to deny that the shooting down of the satellite was in response to China's ASAT test one year prior, or that they were trying to protect classified satellite technology. [23] To promote transparency, the U.S. delegation to the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space stated that after the operation concluded, the special modifications made to the two remaining missiles and three naval vessels were removed and that the United States "has no plans to adapt any technology from this extraordinary effort for use on any current or planned weapon system." [24] U.S. officials pointed out that the U.S. had no reason to prove that it could shoot down a satellite, as the U.S. had already publicly done so in the 1980s. Another key difference pointed out by General Cartwright was that this intercept happened at a much lower altitude, whereas China's ASAT weapon destroyed a target at a much higher altitude, which resulted in the creation of debris which continues to pose a potential hazard to other spacecraft. Finally, U.S. officials again affirmed that the mission's intent was to preserve human life. [23]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-satellite weapon</span> Kinetic energy device designed to destroy satellites in orbit

Anti-satellite weapons (ASAT) are space weapons designed to incapacitate or destroy satellites for strategic or tactical purposes. Although no ASAT system has yet been utilised in warfare, a few countries have successfully shot down their own satellites to demonstrate their ASAT capabilities in a show of force. ASATs have also been used to remove decommissioned satellites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space debris</span> Pollution around Earth by defunct artificial objects

Space debris are defunct human-made objects in space – principally in Earth orbit – which no longer serve a useful function. These include derelict spacecraft – nonfunctional spacecraft and abandoned launch vehicle stages – mission-related debris, and particularly numerous in Earth orbit, fragmentation debris from the breakup of derelict rocket bodies and spacecraft. In addition to derelict human-made objects left in orbit, other examples of space debris include fragments from their disintegration, erosion and collisions or even paint flecks, solidified liquids expelled from spacecraft, and unburned particles from solid rocket motors. Space debris represents a risk to spacecraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Reconnaissance Office</span> US intelligence agency in charge of satellite intelligence

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) is a member of the United States Intelligence Community and an agency of the United States Department of Defense which designs, builds, launches, and operates the reconnaissance satellites of the U.S. federal government, and provides satellite intelligence to several government agencies, particularly signals intelligence (SIGINT) to the NSA, imagery intelligence (IMINT) to the NGA, and measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT) to the DIA. The NRO announced in 2023 that it plans within the following decade to quadruple the number of satellites it operates and increase the number of signals and images it delivers by a factor of ten.

USS <i>Lake Erie</i> (CG-70) Ticonderoga-class cruiser

USS Lake Erie (CG-70) is a Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser of the United States Navy, commissioned in 1993. She was named after the U.S. Navy's decisive victory in the Battle of Lake Erie during the War of 1812. The cruiser was the first U.S. Navy ship to be commissioned in Hawaii.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space-Based Infrared System</span> Missile warning and defence system

The Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS) is a United States Space Force system intended to meet the United States' Department of Defense infrared space surveillance needs through the first two to three decades of the 21st century. The SBIRS program is designed to provide key capabilities in the areas of missile warning, missile defense, battlespace characterization and technical intelligence via satellites in geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO), sensors hosted on satellites in highly elliptical orbit (HEO), and ground-based data processing and control.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space warfare</span> Combat that takes place in outer space

Space warfare is combat in which one or more belligerents are situated in outer space. The scope of space warfare therefore includes ground-to-space warfare, such as attacking satellites from the Earth; space-to-space warfare, such as satellites attacking satellites; and space-to-ground warfare, such as satellites attacking Earth-based targets. Space warfare in fiction is thus sub-genre and theme of science fiction, where it is portrayed with a range of realism and plausibility. In the real world, international treaties are in place that attempt to regulate conflicts in space and limit the installation of space weapon systems, especially nuclear weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kessler syndrome</span> Theoretical runaway satellite collision cascade that could render parts of Earth orbit unusable

The Kessler syndrome, proposed by NASA scientist Donald J. Kessler in 1978, is a scenario in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) due to space pollution is numerous enough that collisions between objects could cause a cascade in which each collision generates space debris that increases the likelihood of further collisions. In 2009, Kessler wrote that modeling results had concluded that the debris environment was already unstable, "such that any attempt to achieve a growth-free small debris environment by eliminating sources of past debris will likely fail because fragments from future collisions will be generated faster than atmospheric drag will remove them". One implication is that the distribution of debris in orbit could render space activities and the use of satellites in specific orbital ranges difficult for many generations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Program 437</span> Anti-satellite weapons program of the U.S. military

Program 437 was the second anti-satellite weapons program of the U.S. military. The US anti-satellite weapons program began development in the early 1960s and was officially discontinued on 1 April 1975. Program 437 was approved for development by U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on November 20, 1962, after a series of tests involving high altitude nuclear explosions. The program's facilities were located on Johnston Island, an isolated island in the north central Pacific Ocean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Future Imagery Architecture</span> American spy satellite program

Future Imagery Architecture (FIA) was a program awarded to Boeing to design a new generation of optical and radar imaging US reconnaissance satellites for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). In 2005 NRO director Donald Kerr recommended the project's termination, and the optical component of the program was finally cancelled in September 2005 by Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte. FIA has been called by The New York Times "perhaps the most spectacular and expensive failure in the 50-year history of American spy satellite projects." Despite the optical component's cancellation, the radar component, known as Topaz, has continued, with four satellites in orbit as of February 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ASM-135 ASAT</span> Anti-satellite missile

The ASM-135 ASAT is an air-launched anti-satellite multistage missile that was developed by Ling-Temco-Vought's LTV Aerospace division. The ASM-135 was carried exclusively by United States Air Force (USAF) F-15 Eagle fighter aircraft.

On 11 January 2007, China conducted an anti-satellite missile test. A Chinese weather satellite—the FY-1C polar orbit satellite of the Fengyun series, at an altitude of 865 kilometres (537 mi), with a mass of 750 kilograms (1,650 lb)—was destroyed by a kinetic kill vehicle traveling with a speed of 8 km/s (18,000 mph) in the opposite direction. It was launched with a multistage solid-fuel missile from Xichang Satellite Launch Center or nearby.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">USA-193</span> U.S. military satellite (2006–2008)

USA-193, also known as NRO Launch 21, was a United States military reconnaissance satellite launched on 14 December 2006. It was the first launch conducted by the United Launch Alliance (ULA). Owned by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), the craft's precise function and purpose were classified. On 21 February 2008, it was destroyed as a result of Operation Burnt Frost.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solwind</span> Artificial satellite, US Department of Defense

P78-1 or Solwind was a United States satellite launched aboard an Atlas F rocket from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on February 24, 1979. The satellite's mission was extended by several weeks, so that it operated until it was destroyed in orbit on September 13, 1985, to test the ASM-135 ASAT anti-satellite missile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RIM-161 Standard Missile 3</span> Kinetic surface-to-air missile (Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System)

The RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) is a ship-based surface-to-air missile system used by the United States Navy to intercept short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles as a part of Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System. Although primarily designed as an anti-ballistic missile, the SM-3 has also been employed in an anti-satellite capacity against a satellite at the lower end of low Earth orbit. The SM-3 is primarily used and tested by the United States Navy and also operated by the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">USA-202</span>

USA 202, previously NRO Launch 26 or NROL-26, is a classified spacecraft which is operated by the United States National Reconnaissance Office. It is an Advanced Orion ELINT satellite. According to Aviation Week, it "fundamentally involves America's biggest, most secret and expensive military spacecraft on board the world's largest rocket." The combined cost of the spacecraft and launch vehicle has been estimated to be over US$2 billion.

Strictly speaking, a satellite collision is when two satellites collide while in orbit around a third, much larger body, such as a planet or moon. This definition can be loosely extended to include collisions between sub-orbital or escape-velocity objects with an object in orbit. Prime examples are the anti-satellite weapon tests.

China's anti-satellite (ASAT) program has been under development since 1964. The ASAT program has since been moved from Program 640 to Program 863, the General Armaments Department and the State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense. Since its inception, the ASAT program has made progress on the development of three ASAT capable Systems: direct fire, directed-energy weapon, and microsatellites. Tests of these systems have either been directly acknowledged by the PRC, or reported on as ASAT capable. China is pursuing a broad and robust array of counterspace capabilities, which includes direct-ascent antisatellite missiles, co-orbital antisatellite systems, computer network operations, groundbased satellite jammers, and directed energy weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mission Shakti</span> First Indian anti-satellite weapon test

On 27 March 2019, India tested an anti-satellite weapon (ASAT) during an operation code named Mission Shakti. The target of the test was a satellite present in a low Earth orbit, which was hit with a kinetic kill vehicle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kosmos 1408</span> Soviet artificial satellite destroyed by an ASAT missile

Kosmos-1408 was an electronic signals intelligence (ELINT) satellite operated by the Soviet Union. It was launched into low Earth orbit on 16 September 1982 at 14:55 UTC, replacing Kosmos-1378. It operated for around two years before becoming inactive and left in orbit.

References

  1. Webb, Angela (February 26, 2008). "Joint effort made satellite success possible". US Air Force. Archived from the original on July 16, 2012.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Aegis One Time Mission". Missile Defense Agency. Archived from the original on 2012-02-14.
  3. 1 2 Beljac, Marko (March 31, 2008). "Arms Race in Space". Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus.
  4. 1 2 "Decaying spy satellite". Heavens Above.
  5. Shalal-Esa, Andrea (March 7, 2007). "U.S. NRO spy satellite may be total loss". Reuters.
  6. 1 2 3 Krebs, Gunter. "NROL-21". Gunter's Space Page.
  7. 1 2 "Delta II Carries NRO Payload Into Space" (Press release). The Aerospace Corporation. December 14, 2006.
  8. 1 2 3 4 PJ Blount, ed. (2009). "USA-193: Selected Documents" (PDF). Special Topics in Aerospace Law Series. The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-11. Retrieved 2013-01-16.
  9. 1 2 Steinhauser, Lucas; Thon, Scott (Summer 2008). "The Power of Social Networks". Ask Magazine. No. 31. NASA. pp. 17–19. Archived from the original on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2010-07-02.
  10. 1 2 "U.S. downplays threat from falling satellite". NBC News. January 28, 2008.
  11. "U.S. Spy Satellite, Power Gone, May Hit Earth". The New York Times. January 27, 2008.
  12. 1 2 3 "Operation Burnt Frost Videos". How Stuff Works. 26 October 2012.
  13. Satellite Shootdown Extras: General Cartwright Part 2. The Military Channel. February 14, 2008.
  14. Mount, Mike (February 14, 2008). "Officials: U.S. to try to shoot down errant satellite". CNN.
  15. Molczan, Ted (19 February 2008). "Updated elements of USA 193". SatObs.org. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  16. Molczan, Ted (11 February 2008). "TJM obs of 2008 February 11 UTC; USA 193 elements". SatObs.org. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  17. "Satellite Debris Analysis Indicates Hydrazine Tank Hit" (Press release). US Department of Defense. February 25, 2008.
  18. 1 2 Data retrieved from the U.S. military's public satellite catalog maintained at "Space Track" . Retrieved 17 November 2021. Search for "USA 193 DEB" in the SATCAT.
  19. "Russia proposes treaty to ban space weapons". New Scientist. February 12, 2008.
  20. 1 2 "US spy satellite plan 'a cover'". BBC. February 17, 2008.
  21. Shachtman, Noah (February 15, 2008). "Experts Scoff at Sat Shoot-Down Rationale". Wired.
  22. Kelso, TS. "Chinese ASAT Test". Celestrak.
  23. 1 2 Roberts, Kristin (February 14, 2008). "Pentagon plans to shoot down disabled satellite". Reuters.
  24. "COPUOS 767th Meeting: Unedited Transcript" (PDF). April 1, 2008. Retrieved January 4, 2019.