Pacific Seafood

Last updated

Pacific Seafood
Company typePrivate
Founded1941
Headquarters Clackamas, Oregon
Key people
Frank Dulcich, CEO
ProductsSeafood, shellfish, meat, poultry, and assorted deli items
Website www.pacificseafood.com

Pacific Seafood is one of the largest seafood companies in North America. [1] The company launched in 1941 as a small, fresh seafood retail operation in Portland, Oregon, United States. [2] The family-owned business expanded to become one of the largest vertically integrated seafood processing and distribution companies in the United States. [3] Pacific's president and CEO, Frank Dulcich, is the grandson of the company's founder, also named Frank Dulcich. Pacific Seafood has over 2500 employees and is headquartered in Clackamas, Oregon.

Contents

Scope

Pacific processes seafood products from Alaska to Mexico, [4] has facilities in seven Western states and participates in the global seafood trade market. It is a member of the West Coast Seafood Processors Association [5] and is active in supporting fisheries awarded Marine Stewardship Council eco-labels. [6]

Environment and food safety

Some of Pacific's facilities have earned British Retail Consortium (BRC) certification for their protective measures, including separation of raw and cooked products and positive airflow to prevent airborne pathogens. [7] The company collaborated with Georgia-Pacific to use Greenshield, a proprietary moisture-resistant coating for boxes that is 100% recyclable. [8] Pacific has also implemented a waste reduction program that diverts more than 600,000 pounds of material from landfills every year. [9]

Honors

Pacific Seafood was named "Oregon's 10th Most Admired Company" in the agriculture and forest products category by readers of the Portland Business Journal in 2009 and was similarly honored in 2007. [10] The Oregon Restaurant Association named Frank Dulcich as Purveyor of the Year at its annual awards banquet in 2008. [11]

In 2002, the Pacific Surimi unit of the company pleaded no contest to charges of theft stemming from a practice of consistently exaggerating the "weigh back" amount, which is the portion of each catch deemed unsuitable for processing. They paid out $800,000 in damages to the aggrieved parties. [12]

In 2010, fishermen in Oregon filed an antitrust class action lawsuit against Pacific, alleging that the company used unethical tactics based on their share of the market to drive down payouts to fishermen in Oregon, Washington, and California. Some fishermen compared Pacific's effect on the market to the Wal-Mart Effect in retail sales. [12] However, on March 1, 2011, U.S. District Court Judge Owen Panner said the plaintiffs' attorney, Mike Haglund, failed to prove that Pacific has used its huge market share to suppress prices paid to fishermen. "The evidence presented... does not support plaintiffs' allegation," Panner wrote in the ruling. "Instead, the evidence indicates that since 2006 defendants' combined operations have expanded the market for whiting. Each year since 2006 (other than 2009, when there was a worldwide recession), defendants have been paying fishermen significantly higher prices for whiting, with record prices paid in 2008." [13] [14]

In March 2023, a commercial crab fisherman named Brand Little filed a class-action price-fixing lawsuit against Pacific, alleging that he and 1,400 other crabbers in California, Oregon, and Washington were forced to accept lower prices for crab due to anticompetitive behavior by Pacific involving a "multipronged strategy of monopsonization, coercion, dumping, and secret deals." [15] In May 2023, Pacific filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. [16] In May 2024, U.S. Magistrate Court Judge Alex G. Tse granted Pacific's motion to dismiss the case, ruling that Little had not sufficiently proven his claims, but giving Little the opportunity to amend most of his claims by 20 August 2024. [17]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sherman Antitrust Act</span> 1890 U.S. anti-monopoly law

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 is a United States antitrust law which prescribes the rule of free competition among those engaged in commerce and consequently probibits unfair monopolies. It was passed by Congress and is named for Senator John Sherman, its principal author.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States antitrust law</span> American legal system intended to promote competition among businesses

In the United States, antitrust law is a collection of mostly federal laws that regulate the conduct and organization of businesses in order to promote competition and prevent unjustified monopolies. The three main U.S. antitrust statutes are the Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914, and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. These acts serve three major functions. First, Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits price fixing and the operation of cartels, and prohibits other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade. Second, Section 7 of the Clayton Act restricts the mergers and acquisitions of organizations that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. Third, Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Price fixing</span> Agreement over prices between participants on the same side in a market

Price fixing is an anticompetitive agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand.

Collusion is a deceitful agreement or secret cooperation between two or more parties to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading or defrauding others of their legal right. Collusion is not always considered illegal. It can be used to attain objectives forbidden by law; for example, by defrauding or gaining an unfair market advantage. It is an agreement among firms or individuals to divide a market, set prices, limit production or limit opportunities. It can involve "unions, wage fixing, kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship between the colluding parties". In legal terms, all acts effected by collusion are considered void.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">List price</span> Price that the manufacturer recommends for a retailer to charge

The list price, also known as the manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP), or the recommended retail price (RRP), or the suggested retail price (SRP) of a product is the price at which its manufacturer notionally recommends that a retailer sell the product.

Anti-competitive practices are business or government practices that prevent or reduce competition in a market. Antitrust laws ensure businesses do not engage in competitive practices that harm other, usually smaller, businesses or consumers. These laws are formed to promote healthy competition within a free market by limiting the abuse of monopoly power. Competition allows companies to compete in order for products and services to improve; promote innovation; and provide more choices for consumers. In order to obtain greater profits, some large enterprises take advantage of market power to hinder survival of new entrants. Anti-competitive behavior can undermine the efficiency and fairness of the market, leaving consumers with little choice to obtain a reasonable quality of service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dungeness crab</span> Species of crustacean

The Dungeness crab makes up one of the most important seafood industries along the west coast of North America. Its typical range extends from Alaska's Aleutian Islands to Point Conception, near Santa Barbara, California. Dungeness typically grow 6-7 inches at their widest point and inhabit eelgrass beds and sandy bottoms. Its common name comes from the Dungeness Spit in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington state, United States, which shelters a shallow bay inhabited by the crabs.

Chicken of the Sea is a packager and provider of seafood, owned by the Thai Union Group in Samut Sakhon, Thailand. The brand is attached to tuna, salmon, clams, crab, shrimp, mackerel, oysters, kippers and sardines in cans, pouches and cups, as are its sister brands, Genova and Ace of Diamonds.

Wallace v. International Business Machines Corp., 467 F.3d 1104, was a significant case in the development of free software. The case decided, at the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, that in United States law the GNU General Public License (GPL) did not contravene federal antitrust laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hess Corporation</span> American global energy company

Hess Corporation is an American global independent energy company involved in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. It was formed by the merger of Hess Oil and Chemical and Amerada Petroleum in 1968. Leon Hess was CEO from the early 1960s through 1995, after which his son John B Hess succeeded him as chairman and CEO. The company has agreed to be acquired by rival oil company Chevron.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cioppino</span> Italian-American fish stew originating in San Francisco

Cioppino is a fish stew originating in San Francisco, California. It is an Italian-American dish and is related to various regional fish soups and stews of Italian cuisine.

Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to a joint venture between oil companies to market gasoline to gas stations. The Court ruled unanimously that the joint venture's unified price for the two companies' brands of gasoline was not a price-fixing scheme between competitors in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Court instead considered the joint venture a single entity that made pricing decisions, in which the oil companies participated as cooperative investors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bumble Bee Foods</span> American food production company

Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, is an American company that produces canned tuna, salmon, other seafoods, and chicken under the brand names "Bumble Bee," "Wild Selections," "Beach Cliff," "Brunswick," and "Snow's." The brand is marketed as "Clover Leaf" in Canada. The company is headquartered in San Diego, California, United States. It is owned by FCF Co, Ltd. of Taiwan.

News America Marketing, often referred to as just News America, was a marketing business previously owned by News Corp. It publishes SmartSource Magazine, a weekly consumer-branded newspaper insert offering advertising and coupon promotions, delivered in over 1,600 newspapers in the U.S. and is one of three companies in the United States that control almost all the in-store ads and grocery coupons in the United States.

Software monetization is a strategy employed by software companies and device vendors to maximize the profitability of their software. The software licensing component of this strategy enables software companies and device vendors to simultaneously protect their applications and embedded software from unauthorized copying, distribution, and use, and capture new revenue streams through creative pricing and packaging models. Whether a software application is hosted in the cloud, embedded in hardware, or installed on premises, software monetization solutions can help businesses extract the most value from their software. Another way to achieve software monetization is through paid advertising and the various compensation methods available to software publishers. Pay-per-install (PPI), for example, generates revenue by bundling third-party applications, also known as adware, with either freeware or shareware applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Portland Fish Market</span> Fish market in Portland, Oregon, U.S.

Portland Fish Market is a fish market in Portland, Oregon. The fish and chips the market offers in addition to its fresh seafood has received some local accolades.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacqueline (restaurant)</span> Restaurant in Portland, Oregon, U.S.

Jacqueline is a seafood restaurant serving Pacific Northwest cuisine in Portland, Oregon. The restaurant was established in 2016 and has an aquatic theme.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flying Fish Company</span> Seafood company based in Portland, Oregon, U.S.

Flying Fish Company is a sustainable seafood company which operates a fish market, restaurant, and food cart in Portland, Oregon.

References

  1. Siemers, Erik (November 12, 2010). "Pacific Seafood completes $2M upgrade – Portland Business Journal". Bizjournals.com. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  2. "Down the line". Oregon Business. December 18, 2008. Archived from the original on August 22, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  3. Cox, Dian (February 2, 1997). "Pacific Seafood becomes a big fish – Portland Business Journal". Bizjournals.com. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  4. "Pacific Seafood". Wweek.com. Archived from the original on June 1, 2012. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  5. "Ashford University Enters Into Alliance Agreement With Pacific Seafood Group". MarketWatch. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  6. "Portland's Pacific Seafood has MSC certification for halibut fishery". Cabezonrestaurant.com. March 23, 2010. Archived from the original on April 25, 2012. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  7. "Pacific Shrimp earns BRC certification". SeafoodSource.com. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  8. "Pacific seafood's new sustainable shipping cases". Greener Package. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  9. "Pacific Seafood Company Recycles, Sells Waste Styrofoam". GreenBiz.com. September 23, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  10. "Pacific Seafood Named a Most Admired Company in Oregon | Business Wire". Find Articles. December 10, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  11. "Oregon Restaurant Association Honors Pacific's Dulcich". SeafoodSource.com. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  12. 1 2 Manning, Jeff (June 22, 2010). "Class-action lawsuit accuses Pacific Seafood of antitrust violations". The Oregonian . Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  13. Manning, Jeff (March 1, 2011). "Pacific Seafoods wins critical preliminary ruling in antitrust case". The Oregonian . Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  14. "Suit against Pacific Seafood takes hit with ruling". Seattle Times . March 2, 2011. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
  15. Chase, Chris (March 21, 2023). "California crab fisherman sues Pacific Seafood over alleged crab price-fixing". Seafood Source. Archived from the original on May 8, 2023. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
  16. White, Cliff (July 27, 2023). "Pacific Seafood fights lawsuit accusing it of anticompetitive behavior in Dungeness crab market". Seafood Source. Archived from the original on August 1, 2023. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
  17. White, Cliff (May 22, 2024). "Pacific Seafood Dungeness crab price-fixing lawsuit dismissed". Seafood Source. Archived from the original on May 23, 2024. Retrieved May 23, 2024.