Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

Last updated
Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board logo.png
Agency overview
Jurisdiction Pennsylvania
Headquarters Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, U.S.
Agency executive
Website Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB) is the independent state government agency in Pennsylvania that manages the beverage alcohol industry in the state under the regulations of the Pennsylvania Liquor Code. The board is responsible for licensing the possession, sale, storage, transportation, importation, and manufacture of wine, spirits, malt or brewed beverages, and operating the state's system of liquor distribution, including retail sales, and providing education about harmful effects associated with underage and dangerous drinking. [1]

Contents

The agency is headquartered is in the Northwest Office Building in Harrisburg, the state capital. [2]

History

Fine Wine & Good Spirits store in Horsham, Pennsylvania Fine Wine & Good Spirits at Village Mall in Horsham PA.jpeg
Fine Wine & Good Spirits store in Horsham, Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board was established in conjunction with the 21st Amendment and the repeal of prohibition. In 1933, just four days before the sale of alcohol became legal in Pennsylvania, the board was officially organized. Then Pennsylvania governor Gifford Pinchot is sometimes inaccurately quoted as having said that the purpose of the board was to "discourage the purchase of alcoholic beverages by making it as inconvenient and expensive as possible," when he believed that state control was the best way to manage the state's obligations under federal prohibition. [3]

On-premises retail licenses and off-premises wholesale licenses are apportioned through a quota system established by the Pennsylvania Liquor Code. Under the law, the PLCB may grant one retail license for every 3,000 inhabitants of a county and one wholesale license for every 30,000 inhabitants of a county with a minimum of five wholesale licenses allowed per county. To prevent a municipality from being inundated by liquor licenses, the Pennsylvania Liquor Code also established a population-based municipal quota that limits the number of retail liquor licenses allowed in a municipality; the issuance or transfer of any additional licenses beyond that quota requires prior municipal approval.

As of November 2016, there were about 20,000 active liquor licenses in Pennsylvania. [4] Restaurants and food operations that are licensed to serve or sell drinks in Pennsylvania must purchase their liquor from the PLCB, which operates more than 600 Fine Wine & Good Spirits stores (originally branded simply as a "State Store," then "PA Wine & Spirits" stores before a rebranding project started in 2010) statewide and an e-commerce site. [5] If a wine or spirit is not on the list of registered brands, then it cannot be bought or sold in Pennsylvania.

In 2015–16, sales at Fine Wine & Good Spirits stores generated more than $2.43 billion in sales and taxes. [6] Taxes and store profits are returned to Pennsylvania’s General Fund; more than $626.3 million was returned to the Pennsylvania Treasury, funded state programs or was returned to local communities in FY2015-16. [7]

In the five fiscal years since fiscal year between 2011-12 and 2015-16, PLCB provided more than $2.66 billion to the Pennsylvania Treasury, $122.5 million to the Pennsylvania State Police, $12.1 million to the Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs, and $22.5 million to local communities. [7] Since its inception, the PLCB has contributed more than $15.1 billion to the Pennsylvania Treasury. [8]

The Board also supervises local option referendums in counties and municipalities that wish to prohibit or permit establishments to sell or serve alcohol. According to Section 472 of the Pennsylvania Liquor Code, a local option referendum to change what alcohol sales a municipality allows or prohibits may be voted on during any election. [9]

The issue may not be voted on more than once in four years. A referendum can be broad, allowing all forms of alcohol sales in a municipality, for instance, or it can be very narrow, such as allowing only a specific golf course to sell alcohol. To place a referendum on the ballot requires a petition with a number of signatures equal to at least 25 percent of the highest vote cast for any office in that municipality in the preceding general election. As of August 2017, almost 700 municipalities in Pennsylvania are "dry" or "partially dry." [10]

Unlike other Pennsylvania administrative agencies, appeals from decisions of the board are assigned to the local Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, rather than directly to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

As a result of Act 14, which was enacted on June 30, 1987, enforcement of the Pennsylvania Liquor Code was transferred from the PLCB to the Pennsylvania State Police. [11] This function is fully funded by the PLCB out of operational revenues. [7]

Programs to deter underage drinking

The PLCB Bureau of Alcohol Education provides educational material to youth, legal consumers and beverage alcohol servers. [12] This includes RAMP (Responsible Alcohol Management Program), which is directed at establishments selling alcoholic beverages. [13]

PLCB policy of "zero tolerance" for sales to minors and intoxicated individuals has resulted in store employees challenging, or "carding," those who appear to be underage. Store employees can also require a customer to fill out a form attesting to his/her age before the sale is completed. This policy and effective implementation are considered to be an excellent deterrent to underage drinking in Pennsylvania.[ by whom? ] According to the PLCB Fiscal Year 2014–15 Annual Report, Fine Wine & Good Spirits store employees conducted more than 1.3 million ID checks during the 2014 calendar year. [14]

The Bureau of Alcohol Education annually awards approximately $1 million in grants to reduce underage and dangerous drinking to colleges and universities, community organizations, law enforcement departments, and high schools. [15] Those same groups send representatives to an annual Alcohol Education conference for prevention professionals in Pennsylvania. Another annual event is the Alcohol Awareness Poster Contest for students in kindergarten through 12th grade.

Quotas

The quota on retail liquor licenses is set forth in Section 461(a) of the Pennsylvania Liquor Code. [16] While that section lays out exceptions, generally, Restaurant Liquor (R), Eating Place Malt Beverage (E), Club (C) and Catering Club Liquor (CC) licenses are subject to the quota. Quota exceptions include ski resorts and casinos. Hotel (H), Off-Track Wagering Restaurant Liquor (OWR), Airport Restaurant (AR), Golf Course (PGR, PGC, GCC, PGE), Continuing Care Retirement (CRR, CRE), Economic Development (EDR, EDE), Performing Arts (PAF) and Public Venue Restaurant (PV) licenses are not subject to the quota.

The first retail license quota was established by Act 358 of 1939, which set it at 1 license for every 1,000 municipal inhabitants. That was changed to 1 license for every 1,500 inhabitants by Act 702 of 1951; 1 license for every 2,000 inhabitants by Act 108 of 1972; and 1 license for every 3,000 inhabitants by Act 160 of 1990. The quota system was switched to a county-based system by Act 141 of 2000. [17]

Section 437(f) of the Pennsylvania Liquor Code establishes quotas for Malt Beverage Distributors (D) and Malt Beverage Importing Distributors (ID). [18] One D or ID license is issued for every 30,000 residents, with a minimum of five available in each county. There are no exceptions. Act 591 of 1952 established the distributor license quota at 1 license for every 10,000 county inhabitants and a minimum of five per county. Act 445 of 1965 changed the quota to 1 license for every 15,000 county inhabitants; Act 160 of 1990 made it 1 license for every 30,000 county inhabitants. [17]

Board members and their terms of service

DatesChairmanMemberMember
Nov. 29, 1933, to March 6, 1934 Robert. S. Gawthrop (R) A. Marshall Thompson (D) Vacant
March 7, 1934, to July 7, 1935Robert. S. Gawthrop (R)A. Marshall Thompson (D) W. Worrell Wagner (R)
July 7, 1935, to Dec. 31, 1936Walter T. Grosscup (D)W. Worrell Wagner (R)Leo A. Crossen (D)
Jan. 2, 1937, to Jan. 22, 1939Leo A. Crossen (D)W. Worrell Wagner (R) J. Twing Brooks (D)
Jan. 23, 1939, to April 23, 1939VacantW. Worrell Wagner (R)J. Twing Brooks (D)
April 24, 1939, to Sept. 15, 1939 Walter Harrison Hitchler (R) W. Worrell Wagner (R)J. Twing Brooks (D)
Sept. 16, 1939, to May 31, 1940Walter Harrison Hitchler (R)W. Worrell Wagner (R)Vacant
June 1, 1940, to Dec. 11, 1940William S. Rial (R)W. Worrell Wagner (R)Vacant
Dec. 12, 1940, to July 19, 1941William S. Rial (R)W. Worrell Wagner (R) Frederick T. Gelder (R)
July 20, 1941, to May 12, 1943Frederick T. Gelder (R)W. Worrell Wagner (R)Vacant
May 13, 1943, to Feb. 4, 1947Frederick T. Gelder (R) W. Searight Stuart (R) Vacant
Feb. 5, 1947, to Feb. 11, 1947Frederick T. Gelder (R)VacantVacant
Feb. 12, 1947, to Jan. 21, 1948Frederick T. Gelder (R) Charles C. McGovern (R) Vacant
Jan. 22, 1948, to April 30, 1949Frederick T. Gelder (R)Charles C. McGovern (R) Frank D. Armstrong (R)
May 1, 1949, to May 31, 1949Frederick T. Gelder (R)Frank D. Armstrong (R)Vacant
June 1, 1949, to Sept. 3, 1953Frederick T. Gelder (R)Frank D. Armstrong (R) David R. Perry (R)
Sept. 4, 1953, to Feb. 7, 1955Frederick T. Gelder (R)David R. Perry (R)Vacant
Feb. 8, 1955, to Dec. 31, 1955 Patrick E. Kerwin (D) Donald A. Behney (R) John S. Rice (D)
Jan. 2, 1956, to Jan. 25, 1956Patrick E. Kerwin (D)Donald A. Behney (R)Vacant
Jan. 26, 1956, to Dec. 1, 1957Patrick E. Kerwin (D)Donald A. Behney (R) Abraham D. Cohn (D)
Dec. 2, 1957, to Sept. 5, 1961Patrick E. Kerwin (D)Abraham D. Cohn (D)Daniel B. Swaney (D)
Sept. 6, 1961, to Jan. 12, 1964Abraham D. Cohn (D)Daniel B. Swaney (D) Dean R. Fisher (D)
Jan. 13, 1964, to May 8, 1966Abraham D. Cohn (D)Dean R. Fisher (D) James E. Staudinger (R)
May 9, 1966, to Nov. 21, 1966Abraham D. Cohn (D)Dean R. Fisher (D)Vacant
Nov. 22, 1966, to Dec. 19, 1966Abraham D. Cohn (D)Dean R. Fisher (D) Edwin Winner (R)
Dec. 20, 1966, to May 31, 1967Abraham D. Cohn (D)Edwin Winner (R) William Z. Scott (R)
June 1, 1967, to Jan. 2, 1968William Z. Scott (R)Abraham D. Cohn (D)Edwin Winner (R)
Jan. 2, 1968, to Jan. 3, 1972William Z. Scott (R)Edwin Winner (R)George R. Bortz (R)
Jan. 4, 1972, to Jan. 28, 1972Edwin Winner (R)George R. Bortz (R)Daniel W. Pennick (D)
Jan. 28, 1972, to Dec. 1, 1972Edwin Winner (R)Daniel W. Pennick (D)Vacant
Dec. 1, 1972, to Dec. 4, 1972Edwin Winner (R)Daniel W. Pennick (D)Gene Roscioli (D)
Dec. 4, 1972, to Nov. 30, 1974Gene Roscioli (D)Edwin Winner (R)Daniel W. Pennick (D)
Nov. 30, 1974, Jan. 6, 1975VacantEdwin Winner (R)Vacant
Jan. 6, 1975, to Sept. 28, 1976 Henry H. Kaplan (D) Edwin Winner (R)Daniel W. Pennick (D)
Sept. 29, 1976, to March 1, 1979Henry H. Kaplan (D)Daniel W. Pennick (D)Ralph O. Barnett (D)
March 2, 1979, to May 18, 1980Daniel W. Pennick (D)Ralph O. Barnett (D)Vacant
May 19, 1980, to Dec. 8, 1987Daniel W. Pennick (D)Ralph O. Barnett (D)Mario Mele (R)
Act 14 of 1987
Dec. 9, 1987, to May 19, 1992 James A. Goodman (D) Robert P. Fohl (R) Oliver L. Slinker (D)
May 20, 1992, to July 5, 1992James A. Goodman (D)Robert P. Fohl (R)Vacant
July 6, 1992, to May 16, 1995James A. Goodman (D)Robert P. Fohl (R)Oliver L. Slinker (D)
May 17, 1995, to May 22, 1995VacantRobert P. Fohl (R)Oliver L. Slinker (D)
May 23, 1995, to May 21, 1996 John E. Jones III (R) Robert P. Fohl (R)Oliver L. Slinker (D)
May 22, 1996, to June 16, 1997John E. Jones III (R)Robert P. Fohl (R)Vacant
June 17, 1997, to May 19, 1998John E. Jones III (R)Robert P. Fohl (R) P.J. Stapleton (D)
May 20, 1998, to June 8, 1998John E. Jones III (R)P.J. Stapleton (D)Vacant
June 9, 1998, to Sept. 24, 1999John E. Jones III (R)Robert P. Fohl (R)P.J. Stapleton (D)
Sept. 25, 1999, to Oct. 25, 1999John E. Jones III (R)P.J. Stapleton (D)Vacant
Oct. 26, 1999, to Aug. 2, 2002John E. Jones III (R)P.J. Stapleton (D)Jonathan H. Newman (R)
Aug. 3, 2002, to April 28, 2003Jonathan H. Newman (R)P.J. Stapleton (D)Vacant
April 29, 2003, to Jan. 11, 2007Jonathan H. Newman (R)P.J. Stapleton (D) Thomas F. Goldsmith (R)
Jan. 12, 2007, to Nov. 19, 2007P.J. Stapleton (D)Thomas F. Goldsmith (R)Vacant
Nov. 20, 2007, to Oct. 31, 2011P.J. Stapleton (D)Thomas F. Goldsmith (R)Robert S. Marcus (R)
Nov. 1, 2011, to Oct. 6, 2012 Joseph E. "Skip" Brion (R) P.J. Stapleton (D)Robert S. Marcus (R)
Oct. 7, 2012, to Nov. 13, 2013Joseph E. "Skip" Brion (R)Robert S. Marcus (R)Vacant
Nov. 14, 2013, to Oct. 21, 2014Joseph E. "Skip" Brion (R)Robert S. Marcus (R) Tim Holden (D)
Oct. 21, 2014, to Feb. 16, 2015Joseph E. "Skip" Brion (R)Tim Holden (D) Mike Negra (R)
Feb. 16, 2015, to Nov. 19, 2015Tim Holden (D)Joseph E. "Skip" Brion (R)Mike Negra (R)
Nov. 20, 2015, to April 20, 2016Tim Holden (D)Mike Negra (R)Vacant
April 20, 2016, to Jan. 6, 2019Tim Holden (D)Mike Negra (R)Michael Newsome (D)
Jan. 7, 2019, to June 19, 2019Tim Holden (D)Mike Negra (R)Vacant
June 20, 2019, to PresentTim Holden (D)Mike Negra (R) Mary Isenhour (D)

Privatization support

For over forty years, starting with the administration of Governor Milton Shapp, efforts have existed to abolish the Board and privatize liquor sales in Pennsylvania. Critics of the Board argue that the commonwealth would generate significant income by selling state liquor stores to private entities while continuing to reap millions in annual sales taxes from alcohol sales and liquor tax revenues. Further, it has been cited that customers could benefit from lower prices, longer hours and wider selection at privately run liquor stores.

In addition, privatizing liquor sales would allow the commonwealth to recoup taxes from sales in neighboring states such as New Jersey, Ohio and Delaware. Despite these arguments, efforts to privatize have largely stalled. According to former governor Dick Thornburgh, "the principal roadblock to reform has traditionally been an odd coalition of state store employee unions, fundamentalist anti-alcohol groups and organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving, all of which perceive that they have legitimate interests which are not susceptible to statewide budgetary considerations. It would take some courageous leadership to stare down this combination, something I do not see in the commonwealth today." [19]

In September 2014, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives proposed a bill that would decriminalize purchasing wine and liquor in other states and transporting it to the state. [20]

Opponents of privatization argued that keeping the stores public would generate significantly more money over time, as well as keep over 5000 employees from losing their jobs, pensions, and health benefits, many of whom are elderly. Although 45% of the entire LCB workforce is temporary, seasonal or part-time and may not have all the benefits that full time employees have. [14]

On July 2, 2015, Governor Tom Wolf vetoed the first-ever privatization bill to reach the governor's desk. [21]

On August 8, 2016, Wolf signed into law a bill that allowed for some privatization but kept wine distribution under state control. [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liquor Control Board of Ontario</span> Crown corporation and liquor sales monopoly in Ontario, Canada

The Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) is a Crown corporation that retails and distributes alcoholic beverages throughout the Canadian province of Ontario. It is accountable to the Legislative Assembly through the minister of finance. It was established in 1927 by the government of Premier George Howard Ferguson to sell liquor, wine, and beer. Such sales were banned outright in 1916 as part of prohibition in Canada. The creation of the LCBO marked an easing of the province's temperance regime. By September 2017, the LCBO was operating 651 liquor stores.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Société des alcools du Québec</span> Canadian alcoholic beverages retail chain

The Société des alcools du Québec is a provincial Crown corporation and monopoly in Quebec responsible for the trade of alcoholic beverages within the province.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liquor store</span> Retail shop that sells alcohol

A liquor store is a retail business that predominantly sells prepackaged liquors, wine or beer, usually intended to be consumed off the store's premises. Depending on region and local idiom, they may also be called an off-licence, off-sale, bottle shop, bottle store or, colloquially, bottle-o, liquor store or other similar terms. A very limited number of jurisdictions have an alcohol monopoly. In US states that are alcoholic beverage control (ABC) states, the term ABC store may be used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission</span>

The Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission (OLCC), formerly known as the Oregon Liquor Control Commission, is a government agency of the U.S. state of Oregon. The OLCC was created by an act of the Oregon Legislative Assembly in 1933, days after the repeal of prohibition, as a means of providing control over the distribution, sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages. To this end, the agency was given the authority to regulate and license those who manufacture, sell or serve alcohol. Oregon is one of 18 alcoholic beverage control states that directly control the sales of alcoholic beverages in the United States. In 2014, the passage of Oregon Ballot Measure 91 (2014) legalized the recreational use of marijuana in Oregon and gave regulatory authority to the OLCC.

Alcoholic beverage control states, generally called control states, less often ABC states, are 17 states in the United States that have state monopoly over the wholesaling or retailing of some or all categories of alcoholic beverages, such as beer, wine, and distilled spirits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission</span> Government agency of Alberta, Canada

The Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission (AGLC) is an agency of the government of the Canadian province of Alberta, and regulates alcoholic beverages, recreational cannabis, and gaming-related activities. References to cannabis were added to AGLC's name and governing legislation as cannabis in Canada moved towards legalization in 2018. AGLC was created in 1996 as the Alberta Gaming and Liquor Commission by combining the responsibilities and operations of the Alberta Liquor Control Board (ALCB), Alberta Lotteries, the Alberta Gaming Commission, Alberta Lotteries and Gaming and the Gaming Control Branch. The current Chief Executive Officer as of 2020 is Kandice Machado.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montgomery County Alcohol Beverage Services</span> Government agency of Montgomery County, Maryland, United States

Alcohol Beverage Services, previously known as the Department of Liquor Control is a government agency within the County of Montgomery, Maryland and is the wholesaler of beer, wine and spirits alcoholic beverage throughout the county's 507-square-mile (1,310 km2) area. Montgomery County Department of Liquor Control also exercises control over retail sales for off-premises consumption, either through government-operated package stores or designated agents.

The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board, formerly the Washington State Liquor Control Board, is an administrative agency of the State of Washington. The Liquor and Cannabis Board is part of the executive branch and reports to the Governor. The board's primary function is the licensing of on and off premises establishments which sell any type of alcohol, and the enforcement and education of the state's alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liquor license</span> Governmentally issued permit to sell, manufacture, store, or otherwise use alcoholic beverages

A liquor license is a governmentally issued permit to sell, manufacture, store, or otherwise use alcoholic beverages.

The Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Authority is one of the eleven public safety agencies under the Secretariat of Public Safety and Homeland Security for the Commonwealth. The agency administers the state's ABC laws. ABC stores are the only retail outlets in Virginia where customers may purchase distilled spirits. The profits that Virginia ABC contributes are collected from sales of distilled spirits at ABC stores, taxes collected on beer and wine sales, violation penalties and license fees. Since its establishment in 1934, Virginia ABC has contributed more than $9 billion to the Commonwealth's general fund. Virginia ABC employs more than 4,000 people statewide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alcohol laws of Kansas</span> US state alcohol law

The alcohol laws of Kansas are among the strictest in the United States, in sharp contrast to its neighboring state of Missouri, and similar to its other neighboring state of Oklahoma. Legislation is enforced by the Kansas Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alcohol laws of Pennsylvania</span> Alcohol laws of the U.S. State of Pennsylvania

The alcohol laws of Pennsylvania contain many peculiarities not found in other states, and are considered some of the strictest regulations in the United States.

Alcohol laws of West Virginia are more complex on paper than in actual practice, owing to a provision of the state constitution and "work-arounds" of its terms.

Alcohol laws of Maryland vary considerably by county, due to the wide latitude of home rule granted to Maryland counties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alcohol laws of New Jersey</span> Laws governing alcoholic beverages in New Jersey

The state laws governing alcoholic drinks in New Jersey are among the most complex in the United States, with many peculiarities not found in other states' laws. They provide for 29 distinct liquor licenses granted to manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, and for the public warehousing and transport of alcoholic drinks. General authority for the statutory and regulatory control of alcoholic drinks rests with the state government, particularly the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control overseen by the state's Attorney General.

Blue laws, also known as Sunday laws, are laws that restrict or ban some or all activities on specified days, particularly to promote the observance of a day of rest. Such laws may restrict shopping or ban sale of certain items on specific days. Blue laws are enforced in parts of the United States and Canada as well as some European countries, particularly in Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and Norway, keeping most stores closed on Sundays.

The alcohol laws of Maine regulate the sale and possession of alcohol in the state of Maine in the United States. Maine is an alcoholic beverage control state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Colorado Proposition 125</span>

Proposition 125 is a citizen-initiated, statewide ballot measure that was approved in Colorado on November 8, 2022. If passed, the measure would allow grocery and convenience stores that sell beer to also sell wine.

References

  1. ↑ "About the PLCB". PLCB. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  2. ↑ "Contact Us". PLCB. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  3. ↑ Madaio, Mike (October 2021). "Why Did Pennsylvania Become a Liquor Control State?". Pennsylvania Vine Company. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  4. ↑ "Licensee Search". Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. Retrieved November 7, 2016.
  5. ↑ "www.FineWineAndGoodSpirits.com".
  6. ↑ "Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Reports Record Sales and Contributions to State and Local Governments in Fiscal Year 2015–16". PLCB. 31 August 2016. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  7. 1 2 3 "About Us" (PDF). PLCB. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  8. ↑ "Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Reports Record Sales and Contributions to State and Local Governments in Fiscal Year 2015–16". PLCB. 31 August 2016. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  9. ↑ "Section 472, PA Liquor Code". Westlaw. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  10. ↑ PLCB. "List of Dry Municipalities in Pennsylvania, Aug. 1, 2017" (PDF).
  11. ↑ Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement (BLCE).
  12. ↑ "PLCB Bureau of Alcohol Education" . Retrieved November 7, 2016.
  13. ↑ "PLCB RAMP" . Retrieved November 7, 2016.
  14. 1 2 "2014–15 Fiscal Year Annual Report, PLCB" (PDF).
  15. ↑ PLCB. "Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Awards Nearly $2.3 Million in Grants to Reduce Underage and Dangerous Drinking" . Retrieved November 7, 2016.
  16. ↑ "Section 461, Pennsylvania Liquor Code".
  17. 1 2 PLCB. "The Retail Liquor License Quota".
  18. ↑ "Section 437, Pennsylvania Liquor Code".
  19. ↑ "Big ideas: Sell the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board". PennLive.com. 7 June 2009. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  20. ↑ Saget, Joel (27 August 2014). "PA House GOP Seeks To Rekindle Liquor Privatization Debate" . Retrieved 17 September 2014.
  21. ↑ "Wolf vetoes GOP liquor privatization bill for Pennsylvania".
  22. ↑ "Pennsylvania Wine Law Primer". Wine School of Philadelphia. 15 June 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.