Political funding in the United Kingdom

Last updated

Political funding in the United Kingdom has been a source of controversy for many years. [1] Political parties in the UK may be funded through membership fees, party donations or through state funding, the latter of which is reserved for administrative costs. [2] The general restrictions in the UK were held in Bowman v United Kingdom [3] to be fully compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, article 10.

Contents

History

The first effort to regulate the financial dimension of political competition was the Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883. Although this landmark legislation was concerned with constituency candidates, their campaign expenses and their agents only, all other efforts to create a political finance regime started from here. The next legislative step to deal with the subject was the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925 that sought to end the selling of titles in exchange for donations to political parties.

In August 1976 the Committee on Financial Aid to Political Parties, chaired by Lord Houghton of Sowerby, proposed that financial aid to political parties should be given in two forms: (a) general grants to the central organisations for their general purposes and (b) a limited reimbursement of election expenses to parliamentary and local government candidates. [4]

Starting in 2006, political funding came under scrutiny as concerns grew that the largest British political parties were too dependent on a handful of wealthy donors. Furthermore, during the Cash for Honours scandal, concern grew even more. [2] A concern of the 1970s had been that the major parties were unable to raise sufficient funds to operate successfully. [5]

The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000

The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (PPERA) was an act that established the Electoral Commission and required all political parties to register with it, set down accounting requirements for political parties, and introduced controls on donations. [1]

2006 Sir Hayden Phillips inquiry

In March 2006, former civil servant Sir Hayden Phillips was charged with setting up an inquiry to come up with proposal for reform. It reported a year later. He recommended capping individual donations at £50,000 [6] and capping spending for political campaigns. He also suggested increasing state funding by £25m and expanding its reach. [2]

2008 Ministry of Justice report

In June 2008, the Ministry of Justice released a white paper analyzing party finance and expenditure. [6] The paper proposed to tighten controls on spending by parties and candidates, substantially strengthen the powers of the Electoral Commission, and increase the transparency of donations. [7]

2011 Committee on Standards in Public Life report

In November 2011 the Committee on Standards on Public Life, chaired by Sir Christopher Kelly, published a Report on "Political Party Finance. Ending the big donor culture". It is their 13th report, Cm. 8208. The report made five main recommendations:

  1. Contribution limit of £10,000 per donor, party and year;
  2. this limit should not apply to affiliated trade union affiliation fees if such fees are raised by an "opt in";
  3. existing limits for campaign spending should be cut by about 15 percent;
  4. in addition to the present "policy development grant" eligible parties should be granted public funding at the rate of £3.00 per vote in Westminster elections and £1.50 per vote in devolved and European elections;
  5. income tax relief should be available for donations up to £1,000 and membership fees to political parties. [8]

Membership subscriptions

Membership subscriptions ("subs") provide one source of funding for political parties. However, in recent times membership has declined and campaign costs have grown.

The Green Party is the only major political party in the UK which receives the majority of its funding through membership fees and these are what cover the running costs of the organisation. Membership subs have become a more significant source in income for both the SNP and Labour in recent years, as both have seen substantial increases in membership. [2] [9]

Donations

The Conservative Party relies on donations mostly from individuals and companies; as well as these sources the Labour Party receives a significant portion of its donations from trade unions. For example, in the third quarter of 2009, eighteen political parties reported donations totalling £9,532,598 (excluding public funds). The Conservative Party received £5,269,186, the Labour party received £3,045,377 and the Liberal Democrats received £816,663. [10] Donations typically peak before elections. Between 6 April and 6 May 2010 (a general election campaign month) the Conservatives took £7,317,602, Labour £5,283,199 and the Liberal Democrats £724,000. [11]

Quarter-by-quarter aggregates of donations above reporting thresholds are available from the UK Electoral Commission. The following table shows the sum of donations above the reporting thresholds for UK parties with seats in the House of Commons. These figures would not include e.g. a large number of small donations.

Donations above reporting threshold [12]
YearConservative PartyLabour PartyLiberal DemocratsScottish National Party
2013£16,358,446£20,945,689£4,372,1880
2014£29,366,474£26,388,844£8,796,956£4,151,337
2015 (GE) £33,620,578£28,678,161£7,784,137£2,171,696
2016£18,031,645£21,321,339£7,686,6570
2017 (GE) £37,775,223£23,126,548£7,864,244£2,019,202
2018£22,067,325£16,664,422£4,562,0070
2019 (GE) £52,919,571£24,886,998£20,017,7270
2020£15,562,333£14,536,760£4,767,3400
2021£20,128,172£17,061,396£4,539,942£1,917,301

State funding

Opposition parties receive state funding to pay administration cost; Short Money [2] [13] in the House of Commons starting in 1975, and Cranborne Money in the House of Lords starting in 1996 however, there is no state funding available to parties for campaign purposes.

In addition there is a general policy development grant available to parties with two MPs.

Transparency

Donations worth over £7,500 to national parties must be declared, as must be donations worth £1,500 or more to local associations. [14] Donations to members' associations – groups whose members are primarily or entirely members of a single political party – also need to be declared above £7,500. This produces a loophole where donors can donate larger sums to local candidates while remaining anonymous, by channeling those donations through a members' association such as the United and Cecil Club. [15]

For a while, as a loophole, loans did not have to be declared. [2]

Northern Ireland political parties are exempt from revealing the identity of party donors due to security reasons.

See also

National

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Campaign finance</span> Political vote advocacy funding

Campaign finance, also known as election finance or political donations, refers to the funds raised to promote candidates, political parties, or policy initiatives and referendums. Political parties, charitable organizations, and political action committees are vehicles used for fundraising for political purposes. "Political finance" is also popular terminology, and is used internationally for its comprehensiveness. Political donations to funds received by political parties from private sources for general administrative purposes.

The Co-operative Party is a centre-left political party in the United Kingdom, supporting co-operative values and principles. Established in 1917, the Co-operative Party was founded by co-operative societies to campaign politically for the fairer treatment of co-operative enterprise and to elect 'co-operators' to Parliament. The party's roots lie in the Parliamentary Committee of the Co-operative Union established in 1881.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Sainsbury, Baron Sainsbury of Turville</span> British politician, businessman and philanthropist

David John Sainsbury, Baron Sainsbury of Turville, is a British politician, businessman and philanthropist. From 1992 to 1997, he served as chairman of Sainsbury's, the supermarket chain established by his great grandfather John James Sainsbury in 1869.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wendy Alexander</span> Scottish politician

Wendy Alexander is a retired Scottish politician and the former Member of the Scottish Parliament (MSP) for Paisley North. She held various Scottish Government cabinet posts and was the Leader of the Labour Party in Scotland from 2007 to 2008. In 2010–2011 she convened the Scotland Bill Committee on financial powers of the Scottish Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral Commission (United Kingdom)</span> Independent agency that regulates the electoral process in the United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, the Electoral Commission is the national election commission, created in 2001 as a result of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. It is an independent agency that regulates party and election finance and sets standards for how elections should be run.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom that sets out how political parties, elections and referendums are to be regulated in the United Kingdom. It formed an important part of the constitutional reform programme implemented by the 1997 Labour Government, building on the Registration of Political Parties Act 1998 which was passed two years earlier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blind trust</span> Trust with complete autonomy of trustees

A blind trust is a trust in which the trust beneficiaries have no knowledge of the holdings of the trust, and no right to intervene in their handling. In a blind trust, the trustees have full discretion over the assets. Blind trusts are generally used when a trust creator wishes for the beneficiary to be unaware of the specific assets in the trust, such as to avoid conflict of interest between the beneficiary and the investments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cash-for-Honours scandal</span> Political scandal in the United Kingdom

The Cash-for-Honours scandal was a political scandal in the United Kingdom in 2006 and 2007 concerning the connection between political donations and the award of life peerages. A loophole in electoral law in the United Kingdom means that although anyone donating even small sums of money to a political party has to declare this as a matter of public record, those loaning money at commercial rates of interest did not have to make a public declaration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progressive Britain</span> Political organisation linked to the Labour Party in the United Kingdom

Progressive Britain, formerly known as Progress, is a political organisation associated with the British Labour Party, founded in 1996 to support the New Labour leadership of Tony Blair. It is seen as being on the right of the party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral Finance Act 2007</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Electoral Finance Act 2007 was a controversial act in New Zealand. The Fifth Labour Government introduced the Electoral Finance Bill partly in response to the 2005 New Zealand election funding controversy, in particular to "third-party" campaigns.

Political funding in Australia deals with political donations, public funding and other forms of funding received by politician or political party in Australia to pay for an election campaign. Political parties in Australia are publicly funded, to reduce the influence of private money upon elections, and subsequently, the influence of private money upon the shaping of public policy. After each election, the Australian Electoral Commission distributes a set amount of money to each political party, per vote received. For example, after the 2013 election, political parties and candidates received $58.1 million in election funding. The Liberal Party received $23.9 million in public funds, as part of the Coalition total of $27.2 million, while the Labor Party received $20.8 million.

Political finance covers all funds that are raised and spent for political purposes. Such purposes include all political contests for voting by citizens, especially the election campaigns for various public offices that are run by parties and candidates. Moreover, all modern democracies operate a variety of permanent party organizations, e.g. the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee in the United States or the Conservative Central Office and the Labour headquarters in the United Kingdom. The annual budgets of such organizations will have to be considered as costs of political competition as well. In Europe the allied term "party finance" is frequently used. It refers only to funds that are raised and spent in order to influence the outcome of some sort of party competition. Whether to include other political purposes, e.g. public relation campaigns by lobby groups, is still an unresolved issue. Even a limited range of political purposes indicates that the term "campaign funds" is too narrow to cover all funds that are deployed in the political process.

Party finance in Germany is the subject of statutory reports, which up to 35 parties file annually with the administration of the German parliament. Important questions pertaining to political party funding can be answered by analysing the data given in these financial reports: How much money is raised and spent by each party operating in Germany? What assets are at the disposal, which debts are on the books of German parties? For which purposes did parties spend their funds? From which itemized sources did a specific party collect its revenue? Who are the donors of major contributions and how much did each donor give during a specific calendar year?

Political party funding is a method used by a political party to raise money for campaigns and routine activities. The funding of political parties is an aspect of campaign finance.

The term corporate donation refers to any financial contribution made by a corporation to another organization that furthers the contributor's own objectives. Two major kinds of such donations deserve specific consideration, charitable as well as political donations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political funding in New Zealand</span>

Political funding in New Zealand deals with political donations, public funding and other forms of funding received by politician or political party in New Zealand to pay for an election campaign. Only quite recently has political funding become an issue of public policy. Now there is direct and indirect funding by public money as well as a skeleton regulation of income, expenditure and transparency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vote Leave</span> Organization that campaigned for UK withdrawal from the EU

Vote Leave was a campaigning organisation that supported a "Leave" vote in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. On 13 April 2016 it was designated by the Electoral Commission as the official campaign in favour of leaving the European Union in the Referendum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hillary Victory Fund</span>

The Hillary Victory Fund was a joint fundraising committee for Hillary for America, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and 33 state Democratic committees. As of May 2016, the Fund had raised $61 million in donations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Pinto-Duschinsky</span> Hungarian-born British political consultant and writer

Michael Pinto-Duschinsky is a Hungarian-born British scholar, political consultant and writer. The Times called his work "authoritative". Pinto-Duschinsky, who is considered a "prominent author", has written for The Times and other outlets. The Guardian, The BBC, The Times, The Financial Times and the Daily Express have published his views on a number of issues.

Several allegations of unlawful campaigning in the 2016 EU referendum have been made. Some allegations were dismissed by the investigating bodies, but in other cases wrongdoing was established, leading to the imposition of penalties. Sanctions have included the levying of the maximum fine possible on Facebook for breaches of data privacy.

References

  1. 1 2 Gay, Oonagh; White, Isobel (10 April 2007). Kelly, Richard (ed.). The Funding of Political Parties (PDF). House of Commons Library. p. 7.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Q&A: Political party funding". BBC. 20 July 2007. Retrieved 1 February 2009.
  3. [1998] ECHR 4
  4. Report of the Committee on Financial Aid to Political Parties, chaired by Lord Houghton of Sowerby, London: H.M.S.O, 1976, Cmnd. 6601, p. xv.
  5. Report of the Committee on Financial Aid to Political Parties (Chairman: Lord Houghton of Sowerby), London: H.M.S.O., 1976, Cmd. 6601; Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, British Political Finance, 1830–1980. Washington, DC: AEI, 1981.
  6. 1 2 "Party Finance and Expenditure in the United Kingdom Report" (PDF). Ministry of Justice. 16 June 2008. Retrieved 1 February 2009.
  7. "Party Finance and Expenditure in the United Kingdom". Ministry of Justice. 16 June 2008. Retrieved 1 February 2009.
  8. Committee on Standards in Public Life (November 2011). Political party finance: Ending the big donor culture (PDF). Thirteenth Report. pp. 8–9. ISBN   9780101820820.
  9. "Greener Tomorrow | Green Party Members' Website". greenparty.org.uk. Retrieved 13 October 2016.
  10. "Political parties' latest donations and borrowing figures published". UK Electoral Commission. 25 November 2009. Retrieved 22 January 2010.
  11. "Party donations and borrowing in final week of general election campaign published". UK Electoral Commission. 14 May 2009. Retrieved 15 May 2010.
  12. "Donations accepted". www.electoralcommission.org.uk. UK Electoral Commission. Retrieved 15 April 2023.
  13. Gay. The Funding of Political Parties. pp. 9.
  14. "Donations and loans reported every quarter by political parties". UK Electoral Commission. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
  15. Oliver Wright (16 May 2014). "Tory dining club secretively channels hundreds of thousands of pounds of funding by anonymous wealthy donors". The Independent. Retrieved 22 February 2017.

Further reading