ProtectMarriage.com

Last updated
ProtectMarriage.com
Founded2002 (2002)
26-4753183 (EIN)
Registration no.C3196520
FocusPolitical advocacy
Location
Key people
Ron Prentice, Executive Director
Revenue
$416,921 (2009) [1]
Website protectmarriage.com
Formerly called
California Renewal

ProtectMarriage.com was a collection of conservative and religious American political activist groups aligned in opposition to same-sex marriage. [2] [3] The coalition's stated goal is to "defend and restore the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman." [4] Beginning in 2001 as Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund holding the domain name protectmarriage.com, the organization reformed in 2005 as a coalition to sponsor California Proposition 8, called the California Marriage Protection Act, [5] and was successful in placing it on the ballot in 2008. Proposition 8 amended the California Constitution, putting a halt to same-sex marriages in California for nearly two years until the proposition was overturned as unconstitutional. While it was in effect, ProtectMarriage.com defended the amendment in a series of legal challenges. Ron Prentice is the executive director. [2]

Contents

History

The coalition widely distributed these yard signs during their pro-Prop 8 California campaign in 2008. YesOnProp8YardSign.png
The coalition widely distributed these yard signs during their pro-Prop 8 California campaign in 2008.

In 2001, an organization was formed to defend the previous year's California Proposition 22 against legal challenges, to maintain Prop 22's definition of marriage in California as being between a man and a woman. The group, Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund, formed as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, and established a website at protectmarriage.com in September 2002. [6] [7] With California State Senator William J. "Pete" Knight serving as chairman of the board, the group reported "just over $266,000 of revenue" in its first year. [7] Andrew Pugno held the role of chief counsel—he had been associated with Knight's marriage definition legislation since 1995. Pugno helped Knight form the nonprofit. [8]

Knight died in May 2004. In March 2005, a San Francisco Superior Court judge ruled Prop 22 unconstitutional, and in April, AB 205 was passed by the California legislature; a law which extended many marriage benefits to domestic partners of any sex. These challenges to the one-man-one-woman definition of marriage spurred a change in strategy: rather than defend Prop 22, the advocates associated with the Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund would re-organize under a new name to pass new legislation. Ron Prentice, executive director of the California Family Council, teamed with former Prop 22 defenders, including Pugno, to establish a coalition of like-minded groups such as Alliance Defending Freedom. [8] The name ProtectMarriage.com was first presented online mid-2005. [9]

Organization

Ron Prentice, the executive director of ProtectMarriage.com, is a licensed marriage and family therapist. In addition to his duties at the organization, he served as Chief Executive Officer of the California Family Council until December 2013. [10] [11]

Andrew Pugno is lead counsel at ProtectMarriage.com. He coauthored Proposition 8, and continues its legal defense. [12] Pugno began his efforts against same-sex marriage in 1995 with then-assemblyman Pete Knight. He served as chief counsel in the defense of Proposition 22. [13]

In July 2008, ProtectMarriage.com hired Jennifer Kerns as communications director. Kerns, a public relations consultant, was previously the communications director for Steve Poizner's successful 2006 bid for the position of California Insurance Commissioner. She also served as assistant to California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson, analyzing election practices and results. [14]

ProtectMarriage.com comprises three programs: Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund, the ProtectMarriage.com Educational Foundation and ProtectMarriage.com Action Fund. [15]

Relations with other organizations

Members of the coalition include: the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, and the California Family Alliance. [16]

Catholics for ProtectMarriage.com was formed to support the Proposition 8 campaign. The organization was a collaboration between the Knights of Columbus, the California Catholic Conference and Catholics for the Common Good. [17]

L. Whitney Clayton is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) liaison with the coalition. [18]

Proposition 8

Proposition 8 rally in Fresno Fresno - Prop 8 Rally.jpg
Proposition 8 rally in Fresno

In April, 2008, ProtectMarriage.com submitted a petition containing 1,120,801 signatures—426,447 more than was necessary to put the measure on the ballot. [2] It appeared on the ballot as the Eliminates Rights of Same-Sex Couples to Marry Initiative Constitutional Amendment but was called the California Marriage Protection Act by proponents. The proponents of the measure spent approximately $40 million to promote the proposition, which passed, defining marriage in California as being between one man and one woman. [13]

Strauss v. Horton

Opponents of Prop 8 filed a legal challenge in the California Supreme Court. The Proposition 8 legal defense team featured Ken Starr. The court upheld the constitutionality of the amendment. [19] [20] [21]

Perry v. Schwarzenegger

A lawsuit resulted from Courage Campaign altering the top image. The bottom image, which shows two female adult figures, was allowed as a parody. Logo stack, ProtectMarriage vs Courage Campaign.jpg
A lawsuit resulted from Courage Campaign altering the top image. The bottom image, which shows two female adult figures, was allowed as a parody.

ProtectMarriage.com took on the role of main defense in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the case challenging Proposition 8 in federal court. [22] Under the leadership of California State Senator Dennis Hollingsworth, ProtectMarriage.com hired attorney Charles Cooper of Cooper & Kirk to form the defense. [23] Pugno said he considered a number of legal firms but settled upon Cooper & Kirk because he believed them on par with Theodore Olson, former United States Solicitor General, the attorney for the plaintiffs. [24] In October 2009, Cooper "deflected" an effort by Liberty Counsel to use the court case to prove that homosexuality was an "illness or disorder". [24] Cooper explained to reporters his view that Liberty Counsel wanted to fight battles that "can't be won." [24] Pugno said that ProtectMarriage.com has tried to distance itself from "strident and combative" fringe groups in order to set a "civilized tone" for the defense, in the same manner as the proposition campaign. [24]

The court case would have been the first federal trial to be captured live by video cameras, shown in real time at public courthouses in San Francisco, Pasadena, Seattle, Portland, and Brooklyn, through an experimental new system developed by the Ninth Circuit Appeals Court. [25] [26] The trial would also have been shown on the video-sharing website YouTube. [25] Federal judge Vaughn R. Walker noted that he had received 138,574 comments on the plans to broadcast the trial, and all but 32 were in favor. [27] In January 2010, two days before the trial, ProtectMarriage.com filed emergency papers with the United States Supreme Court to bar telecasting the trial. The court ruled 8–1 to temporarily stay live streaming, then ruled 5–4 to indefinitely block live streaming. [28] Plaintiff Rick Jacobs of Courage Campaign said that "Prop 8 backers are continuing their pattern of keeping the truth about this trial from the American public." [22]

From January 11 to January 28, Courage Campaign mounted a website called Prop 8 Trial Tracker which received more than 464,000 views. [22] The website used a logo very similar to their opponent's logo, and the ProtectMarriage.com legal team sent a cease and desist letter, demanding that Courage Campaign stop using the similar logo. Nathan Sabri, an attorney with Morrison & Foerster, the law firm handling the case pro bono for Courage Campaign, responded by writing that the request had no merit, and that his client had noted the irony of the ProtectMarriage.com position—that the image of two children flanked by a man and a woman was said by ProtectMarriage.com to be "substantially indistinguishable" from the two children flanked by two women. [22] On January 19, ProtectMarriage.com filed a lawsuit asking for a temporary restraining order to stop the use of the similar logo. [29] [30] Federal judge Lawrence K. Karlton ruled in favor of Courage Campaign's argument which cited prior cases of one logo being parodied by another. [22]

United States district court Judge Vaughn R. Walker overturned Proposition 8 on August 4, 2010, in the case Perry v. Schwarzenegger , ruling that it violated both the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the United States Constitution. [31] ProtectMarriage.com appealed the ruling. In June 2011, Walker's ruling was upheld by James S. Ware, chief judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [3] In 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed that the proposition violated the constitutional rights of gays and lesbians. [32] When the matter was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, the court found that ProtectMarriage.com had not had legal standing for a federal appeal case, and ordered the Appeals court ruling voided, leaving Walker's ruling standing. California resumed issuing same-sex marriage certificates the following day, leading ProtectMarriage.com to file an emergency application with the Supreme Court, asking that the marriages be halted because the state had not waited the usual 25 days during which the Supreme Court can be asked to reconsider a case before its disposition is considered final. [33] That request was quickly denied by Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, who had dissented from the decision that had denied ProtectMarriage.com standing. [34]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2000 California Proposition 22</span> Referendum in California on same-sex marriage ban

Proposition 22 was a law enacted by California voters in March 2000 stating that marriage was between one man and one woman. In November 2008, Proposition 8 was also passed by voters, again only allowing marriage between one man and one woman.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in California since June 28, 2013. The U.S. state first issued marriage licenses to same-sex couples on June 16, 2008 as a result of the Supreme Court of California finding in the case of In re Marriage Cases that barring same-sex couples from marriage violated the Constitution of California. The issuance of such licenses was halted from November 5, 2008 through June 27, 2013 due to the passage of Proposition 8—a state constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriages. The granting of same-sex marriages recommenced following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, which restored the effect of a federal district court ruling that overturned Proposition 8 as unconstitutional.

The San Francisco 2004 same-sex weddings took place between February 12 and March 11, 2004, after San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom directed the city-county clerk to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. California Attorney General Bill Lockyer and a number of interest groups sued to end the practice. About 4,000 such licenses were issued before the California Supreme Court ordered a halt to the practice on March 11. On August 12, 2004, the California Supreme Court voided all of the licenses that had been issued in February and March.

In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757 was a California Supreme Court case where the court held that laws treating classes of persons differently based on sexual orientation should be subject to strict judicial scrutiny, and that an existing statute and initiative measure limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples violate the rights of same-sex couples under the California Constitution and may not be used to preclude them from marrying.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 8</span> Ballot proposition and state constitutional amendment passed in November 2008

Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage; it passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court. The proposition was created by opponents of same-sex marriage in advance of the California Supreme Court's May 2008 appeal ruling, In re Marriage Cases, which followed the short-lived 2004 same-sex weddings controversy and found the previous ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Proposition 8 was ultimately ruled unconstitutional by a federal court in 2010, although the court decision did not go into effect until June 26, 2013, following the conclusion of proponents' appeals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Join the Impact</span> American LGBT political organization

Join the Impact was an American LGBT political organization started in reaction to the passage of Proposition 8 in California which rapidly developed into a national coalition of local LGBT rights groups. The website for the group was established November 7, 2008, after founders Amy Balliett and Willow Witte decided to utilize a website to try to galvanize attention for the cause. The level of success the two women had orchestrating a nationwide protest only a week later may have benefited from the recent historical success the Obama campaign had with the medium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protests against Proposition 8 supporters</span> 2008 protests against a former California law

Protests against Proposition 8 supporters in California took place starting in November 2008. These included prominent protests against the Roman Catholic church and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which supported California's Proposition 8. The proposition was a voter referendum that amended the state constitution to recognize marriage only as being between one man and one woman, thus banning same-sex marriage, which was legal in the state following a May 2008 California Supreme Court case.

Strauss v. Horton, 46 Cal. 4th 364, 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d 591, 207 P.3d 48 (2009), was a decision of the Supreme Court of California, the state's highest court. It resulted from lawsuits that challenged the voters' adoption of Proposition 8 on November 4, 2008, which amended the Constitution of California to outlaw same-sex marriage. Several gay couples and governmental entities filed the lawsuits in California state trial courts. The Supreme Court of California agreed to hear appeals in three of the cases and consolidated them so they would be considered and decided. The supreme court heard oral argument in the cases in San Francisco on March 5, 2009. Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar stated that the cases will set precedent in California because "no previous case had presented the question of whether [a ballot] initiative could be used to take away fundamental rights".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vaughn Walker</span> American judge (born 1944)

Vaughn Richard Walker is an American lawyer who served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California from 1989 to 2011. Walker presided over the original trial in Hollingsworth v. Perry, where he found California's Proposition 8 to be unconstitutional.

Shannon Price Minter is an American civil rights attorney and the legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights in San Francisco.

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is an American non-profit political organization established to work against the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States. It was formed in 2007 specifically to pass California Proposition 8, a state prohibition of same-sex marriage. The group has opposed civil union legislation and gay adoption, and has fought against allowing transgender individuals to use bathrooms that accord with their gender identity. Brian S. Brown has served as the group's president since 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Foundation for Equal Rights</span> American nonprofit organization

The American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER) was a nonprofit organization active in the United States from 2009 through 2015. The organization was established to support the plaintiffs in Hollingsworth v. Perry, a federal lawsuit challenging California's Proposition 8 under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. AFER retained former United States Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson and David Boies to lead the legal team representing the plaintiffs challenging Proposition 8.

Hollingsworth v. Perry was a series of United States federal court cases that re-legalized same-sex marriage in the state of California. The case began in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which found that banning same-sex marriage violates equal protection under the law. This decision overturned California ballot initiative Proposition 8, which had banned same-sex marriage. After the State of California refused to defend Proposition 8, the official sponsors of Proposition 8 intervened and appealed to the Supreme Court. The case was litigated during the governorships of both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown, and was thus known as Perry v. Schwarzenegger and Perry v. Brown, respectively. As Hollingsworth v. Perry, it eventually reached the United States Supreme Court, which held that, in line with prior precedent, the official sponsors of a ballot initiative measure did not have Article III standing to appeal an adverse federal court ruling when the state refused to do so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Love Honor Cherish</span>

Love Honor Cherish or LHC is a Los-Angeles based, non-profit, civil rights organization that advocates for the rights of gay and lesbian couples to marry in California and the repeal of Proposition 8 at the November 2, 2010 general election.

The history of LGBT residents in California, which includes centuries prior to the 20th, has become increasingly visible recently with the successes of the LGBT rights movement. In spite of the strong development of early LGBT villages in the state, pro-LGBT activists in California have campaigned against nearly 170 years of especially harsh prosecutions and punishments toward gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgender people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in California</span>

California is seen as one of the most liberal states in the U.S. in regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) rights, which have received nationwide recognition since the 1970s. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in the state since 1976. Discrimination protections regarding sexual orientation and gender identity or expression were adopted statewide in 2003. Transgender people are also permitted to change their legal gender on official documents without any medical interventions, and mental health providers are prohibited from engaging in conversion therapy on minors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on same-sex marriage

Maine Question 1 was a voter referendum conducted in Maine in the United States in 2009 that rejected a law legalizing same-sex marriage in the state. The measure passed 53–47% on November 3, 2009.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chad Griffin</span> American political activist (born 1973)

Chad Hunter Griffin is an American political strategist best known for his work advocating for LGBT rights in the United States.

References

  1. ↑ "Nonprofit Report for Protectmarriagecom Educational Foundation". GuideStar. Retrieved October 17, 2012.
  2. 1 2 3 "Gay Marriage Ban Makes California Ballot: Initiative Follows Court's Recent Ruling Legalizing Same-Sex Marriages". San Francisco: CBS News. Associated Press. June 3, 2008. Retrieved March 3, 2011.
  3. 1 2 "Update: Gay marriage foes appeal ruling on gay U.S. judge". Reuters. June 27, 2011. Retrieved October 21, 2011.
  4. ↑ "About Us". ProtectMarriage.com. Retrieved March 3, 2011.
  5. ↑ Re: Request for Title and Summary of Proposed Initiative Archived 2015-04-25 at the Wayback Machine , Office of the California Attorney General, October 1, 2007
  6. ↑ "Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund". Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund. Archived from the original on 2002-09-23. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  7. 1 2 "Annual Report to Supporters: 2001–2002" (PDF). Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2004-01-02. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  8. 1 2 "New coalition pushes for constitutional amendment to protect marriage". Christian Examiner. May 2005. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  9. ↑ "Welcome to ProtectMarriage.com". ProtectMarriage.com. Archived from the original on 2005-09-11. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  10. ↑ Common Sense Without Compromise | California Family Council Archived December 29, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  11. ↑ About CFC | California Family Council Archived December 29, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  12. ↑ Thursday Oct 28 2010 (2010-10-28). "Pugno, Pan battle for 5th Assembly District – Folsom Telegraph". Folsomtelegraph.com. Retrieved 2013-12-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  13. 1 2 Pugno, Andrew (May 26, 2009). "Andrew Pugno – 'You can't just change marriage...' – Los Angeles Times". Los Angeles Times.
  14. ↑ "Welcome to ProtectMarriage.com". ProtectMarriage.com. Archived from the original on 2008-07-11. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  15. ↑ Protect Marriage – Yes on 8 » Our Programs Archived July 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  16. ↑ Hubbell, John M. (April 28, 2005). "Coalition seeks male-female marriage definition / New ballot push for constitutional amendment". San Francisco Chronicle. p. B.3.
  17. ↑ Catholic effort launched to support California proposition defending marriage :: Catholic News Agency (CNA). Catholic News Agency. Retrieved on 2011-03-04.
  18. ↑ Leff, Lisa (November 1, 2008). "Nation will closely follow Prop. 8 vote". Deseret News. Salt Lake City, Utah. Associated Press. p. A.2.
  19. ↑ Henderson, Peter (2009-05-22). "California high court to rule on gay marriage ban". Reuters. Retrieved 2009-05-22.
  20. ↑ "California Supreme Court order of November 19, 2008" (PDF). California Supreme Court. 2008-11-19. Retrieved 2008-12-24.
  21. ↑ "Prop 8 proponents seek to nullify same-sex marriages". CNN. 2008-12-19. Retrieved 2008-12-19.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 McMillan, Dennis (January 28, 2010). "Courage Campaign Wins Legal Battle with Prop 8 Supporters". San Francisco Bay Times. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  23. ↑ "Gay Marriage Hearing Begins In Calif. Court". All Things Considered . NPR. December 6, 2010. Retrieved February 28, 2011. Transcript of radio news broadcast, hosted by Melissa Block.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Levine, Dan (October 5, 2009). "A Conservative Choice for Proposition 8 Supporters". Law.com. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  25. 1 2 Egelko, Bob (2010-01-06). "Prop. 8 trial will be shown on YouTube". San Francisco Chronicle . Retrieved 2010-01-06.
  26. ↑ Schwartz, John (2009-12-18). "Rule Invites Cameras Into Federal Civil Cases". The New York Times . Retrieved 2009-12-19.
  27. ↑ "Judge Vaughn Walker: 138,542 in favor, 32 opposed- Courage launched Trial Tracker Blog". Courage Campaign. 2010-01-11. Archived from the original on 2011-07-25.
  28. ↑ Paul Elias and Mark Sherman (January 13, 2010). "High Court: No Cameras at Gay Marriage Trial". Seattle Times. Retrieved August 24, 2010.
  29. ↑ "Morrison & Foerster Secures Victory for Courage Campaign". IPFrontline.com. January 22, 2010. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  30. ↑ "ProtectMarriage.com – Yes on 8 v. Courage Campaign et al". RFC Express. Retrieved February 28, 2011.
  31. ↑ "Ruling by United States District Court" (PDF). San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved August 4, 2010.
  32. ↑ Adam Nagourney (February 7, 2012). "Court Strikes Down Ban on Gay Marriage in California". New York Times. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
  33. ↑ "Challenge filed to stop resumption of Calif. same-sex marriages". KDVR.com. 2013-06-29. Retrieved 2013-12-05.
  34. ↑ "High court lets same-sex marriages in California continue". CNN.com. Retrieved 2013-12-05.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.