Public Interest Legal Foundation

Last updated
Public Interest Legal Foundation
AbbreviationPILF
Formation2012;12 years ago (2012)
TypeResearch [1]
Headquarters107 S. West Street, Suite 700, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314
Location
Coordinates 39°46′02″N86°09′33″W / 39.7673497°N 86.1591224°W / 39.7673497; -86.1591224
President
 J. Christian Adams
Chairman
 Cleta Mitchell
Affiliations501(c)(3)
Revenue (2017)
$2.2 million [1]
Website publicinterestlegal.org

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is an American conservative legal group based in Alexandria, Virginia, [2] which is known for suing states and local governments to purge voters from election rolls. [3] The nonprofit was constituted in 2012.

Contents

PILF asserts that "large numbers of ineligible aliens are registering to vote and casting ballots", although lists that they have displayed of such supposed voters prove to actually include American natives who are eligible voters. [4] PILF said its lists had been based on state government lists of declared "non-citizens" removed from local voter rolls, but some U.S. citizens were wrongfully purged in the process. [5] The group has made false claims about the extent of voter fraud in the United States, [3] [6] [4] and the organization has published the information of eligible voters online, including Social Security numbers, falsely accusing them of being fraudulent voters. [7]

Activities

The Public Interest Legal Foundation was established in 2012. The organization is a 501(c)(3) non-profit American corporation currently based in Alexandria, Virginia. [1]

The group has been involved in legal cases in Texas, North Carolina, North Dakota, Florida, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Nevada, Virginia, Kansas, D.C., and Mississippi. The organization has filed documents in favor of a Florida law barring ex-convicts who owe fines from voting. [8] PILF has also participated as a primary party or intervenor in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The organization also submits amicus curiae briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court on election-related issues.[ citation needed ]

PILF has sent mailings to hundreds of counties claiming that their voting rolls are provably corrupt; Politifact has judged these claims to be "false", stating that "inactive" registrants should not be counted with "active" ones when calculating total rates of voter registration. The foundation originally flagged jurisdictions with more registered voters than resident adults, according to annual U.S. Census population estimates at the time. [6] ProPublica found major counting errors in PlLF's use of government data; PlLF subsequently corrected its analysis. [3]

In 2016 and 2017, the organization published the information of eligible voters online, including Social Security numbers, falsely accusing them of being fraudulent voters. One such voter was a U.S. missionary in Guatemala who, based on PILF's report, was inaccurately highlighted as a fraudulent voter in a Washington Times article. [7] In 2018, the Richmond Council for the League of United Latin American Citizens and four individual voters filed a federal lawsuit, LULAC of Richmond v. Public Interest Legal Foundation, in the Eastern District of Virginia against the PILF for these false reports. The lawsuit claimed violations of the Ku Klux Klan Act and the Voting Rights Act, as well as state defamation laws. [9] PILF settled the lawsuit by removing the personal information from its website and adding a statement to its reports saying "PILF recognizes that individuals in [the removed exhibits] were in fact citizens and that these citizens did not commit felonies. PILF profoundly regrets any characterization of those registrants as felons or instances of registration or voting as felonies." [10]

On January 5, 2024 the organization along with the American Center for Law & Justice and several states filed as an amici curiae in the U.S. Supreme court case [11] Colorado Republican State Central Committee v Norma Anderson et. al.. [12] [13]

Organization

The organization's current president and general counsel is J. Christian Adams, [7] an American attorney and conservative activist [14] formerly employed by the United States Department of Justice under the George W. Bush administration. Adams has described those who say there is no comprehensive proof of systemic voter fraud as "flat-earthers", [15] and opposes automatic voter registration, saying that voter registration should require "forethought and initiative, something lacking in large segments of the Democrat base." [16] In 2017 Adams was chosen by President Donald Trump to be a member of his Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. [15]

Director Hans von Spakovsky is an American attorney and a former member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC). He is the manager of The Heritage Foundation's Election Law Reform Initiative and a senior legal fellow in Heritage's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. [17] He is an advocate for more restrictive voting laws. [18] [19] He has been described as playing an influential role in making alarmism about voter fraud mainstream in the Republican Party, despite no evidence of widespread voter fraud. [7] [16] His work claiming voting fraud is rampant has been discredited. [20] In 2017 President Donald J. Trump named him to be a member of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. [21]

Lawsuits

In 2018 PILF sued Harris County, Texas, alleging violations of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. The complaint claimed the county Voter Registrar's office refused access to records of registered voters identified as noncitizens and what actions the office had taken in regard to these registrations. The lawsuit was settled in March 2020. The county agreed to provide records of people taken off the voter roll due to ineligibility and names of those who received notice their eligibility was questioned b election officials (social security numbers and phone numbers excluded). It also included copies of voter registration applications with blank or negative responses to questions about citizenship. In seven years, the county reported 998 voter registrations challenged or disallowed based on citizenship, and ten percent of the challenged voters successfully countered the challenge [22] Harris County, which includes Houston, has more than 2.5 million registered voters. [23]

In December 2019, PILF filed a lawsuit against the City of Detroit, claiming that the city failed to maintain voter registration records as required by federal and state laws. The suit was dropped in July 2020 after actions by Detroit Clerk Janice Winfrey and Elections Director George Azzouz to review and remove likely deceased registrants on a list provided by the plaintiff. [24] "...after the League of Women Voters of Michigan and the League of Women Voters of Detroit intervened and pressed PILF to produce evidence to support its claims, PILF dropped its lawsuit." [25]

In February 2020, PILF sued Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap for alleged violation of the Public Disclosure Provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The complaint claims Dunlap's office illegally denied the group access to the state's list of registered voters, preventing full public access and monitoring of the rolls as provided by Public Disclosure Provision of the act. State law enumerates those who the list is to be made available to, including to organizations specifically involved in "get out the vote" efforts. The suit states that they were denied the list due to not being involved in such efforts. [26]

Also in February 2020, PILF sued Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, alleging violations of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 for not making a "reasonable effort" to remove the names of ineligible voters from its voter registration rolls. In December 2019, Pennsylvania Auditor General Eugene DePasquale found in an audit of the county's voter rolls that about 42,000 active records should have been placed into inactive status because of five years of inactivity. [27] The American Civil Liberties Union asked the court to allow four groups to intervene. "The ACLU's attorneys argue that the foundation's lawsuit does not account for thousands of names that were removed as part of a routine cleanup of the rolls in January." [28] The lawsuit was settled three months later with an agreement to allow voter registration roll maintenance leads and feedback. [29]

In August 2020, PILF filed a lawsuit against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson for failing to act on a request to disclose voting records related to the 2018 general election from the city of Southfield. The foundation sought records of 193 allegedly altered voter history files from November 2018 that led to six felony charges against Southfield City Clerk Sherikia Hawkins in the altering of ballot records. [30]

PILF was party to an Arizona lawsuit that became known as "Sharpiegate". "The Maricopa County voters’ complaint is centered around the fact that they were forced to use Sharpie brand-type markers to complete their ballots. The use of markers caused many ballots to be set aside when tabulating machines rejected them due to the bleed through of the ink.". [31] The lawsuit was dropped immediately after the election, after Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich indicated an investigation found there was nothing to the claims." [32]

In February 2024, a federal judge in North Dakota dismissed a lawsuit backed by the Public Interest Legal Foundation that challenged the state's acceptance of mail-in ballots after Election Day. State law allows the ballots to be counted by a canvassing board meeting 13 days after the election, so long as they are postmarked by election day. The lawsuit was brought by County Auditor Mark Splonskowski without authorization from his county board, representing a county that includes Bismark, the state capitol. The court ruled Splonskowski lacked standing, failed to show he was harmed by the law or that constitutional rights were being violated and that if successful the lawsuit would impact overseas and military voters. The ruling read in part" "This is deeply concerning to the Court that an elected official openly advocates for violating the law he was elected to enforce because he has independently concluded it contradicts federal law." [33]

Board of directors

Related Research Articles

Judicial Watch (JW) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials. Founded in 1994, JW has primarily targeted Democrats, in particular the administrations of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, as well as Hillary Clinton's role in them. It was founded by attorney Larry Klayman, and has been led by Tom Fitton since 2003.

Voter caging involves challenging the registration status of voters and calling into question the legality of allowing them to vote. Usually it involves sending mail directly to registered voters and compiling a list from mail returned undelivered. Undeliverable mail is seen as proof that the person no longer resides at the address on their voter registration. The resultant list is then used by election officials to purge names from the voter registration rolls or to challenge voters' eligibility to vote on the grounds that the voters no longer reside at their registered addresses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kris Kobach</span> American lawyer and politician (born 1966)

Kris William Kobach is an American lawyer and politician who has served as the attorney general of Kansas since 2023. He previously served as the 31st secretary of state of Kansas from 2011 to 2019. A former chairman of the Kansas Republican Party, Kobach rose to national prominence over his support for anti-immigration advocacy, including involvement in the implementation of high-profile anti-illegal immigration ordinances in various American cities. Kobach is also known for his calls for stronger voter ID laws in the United States. He has made claims about the extent of election fraud in the United States that some studies and media have said are unsubstantiated.

John Christian Adams is an American attorney and conservative activist formerly employed by the United States Department of Justice under the George W. Bush administration. Since leaving the DOJ, Adams has become notable for making alarmist and false claims about the extent of voter fraud in the United States. He has falsely accused a number of legitimate voters of being fraudulent, and has published information about them online, including Social Security numbers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frank LaRose</span> Ohio Secretary of State (born 1979)

Frank LaRose is an American politician. He was elected Secretary of State of Ohio in 2019. He was a Republican member of the Ohio State Senate for two terms, from January 2011 to January 2019. He was a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in the 2024 election, challenging incumbent Senator Sherrod Brown. He lost to Bernie Moreno in the primary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">True the Vote</span> Conservative vote-monitoring organization

True the Vote (TTV) is a conservative vote-monitoring organization based in Houston, Texas, whose stated objective is stopping voter fraud. The organization supports voter ID laws and trains volunteers to be election monitors and to spot and bring attention to suspicious voter registrations that its volunteers believe delegitimize voter eligibility. The organization's founder is Catherine Engelbrecht.

Voter suppression in the United States consists of various legal and illegal efforts to prevent eligible citizens from exercising their right to vote. Such voter suppression efforts vary by state, local government, precinct, and election. Voter suppression has historically been used for racial, economic, gender, age and disability discrimination. After the American Civil War, all African-American men were granted voting rights, but poll taxes or language tests were used to limit and suppress the ability to register or cast a ballot. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 improved voting access significantly. Since the beginning of voter suppression efforts, proponents of these laws have cited concerns over electoral integrity as a justification for various restrictions and requirements, while opponents argue that these constitute bad faith given the lack of voter fraud evidence in the United States.

Voter impersonation, also sometimes called in-person voter fraud, is a form of electoral fraud in which a person who is eligible to vote in an election votes more than once, or a person who is not eligible to vote does so by voting under the name of an eligible voter. In the United States, voter ID laws have been enacted in a number of states by Republican legislatures and governors since 2010 with the purported aim of preventing voter impersonation. Existing research and evidence shows that voter impersonation is extremely rare. Between 2000 and 2014, there were only 31 documented instances of voter impersonation. There is no evidence that it has changed the result of any election. In April 2020, a voter fraud study covering 20 years by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the level of mail-in ballot fraud "exceedingly rare" since it occurs only in "0.00006 percent" of individual votes nationally, and, in one state, "0.000004 percent — about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning in the United States."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wisconsin Elections Commission</span> Wisconsin state commission charged with administering and enforcing election laws

The Wisconsin Elections Commission is a bipartisan regulatory agency of the State of Wisconsin established to administer and enforce election laws in the state. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was established by a 2015 act of the Wisconsin Legislature which also established the Wisconsin Ethics Commission to administer campaign finance, ethics, and lobbying laws. The two commissions began operation on June 30, 2016, replacing the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (GAB), which was abolished.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL) is a nonprofit conservative law firm based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The group was founded by lawyer Rick Esenberg in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity</span> Presidential commission created by President Donald Trump in 2017

The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, also called the Voter Fraud Commission, was a Presidential Commission established by Donald Trump that ran from May 11, 2017, to January 3, 2018. The Trump administration said the commission would review claims of voter fraud, improper registration, and voter suppression. The establishment of the commission followed Trump's false claim that millions of illegal immigrants had voted in the 2016 presidential election, costing him the popular vote. Vice President Mike Pence was chosen as chair of the commission and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach was its vice chair and day-to-day administrator.

After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed 62 lawsuits contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in 9 states and the District of Columbia.

The following is a timeline of major events before, during, and after the 2020 United States presidential election, the 59th quadrennial United States presidential election, from November 2020 to January 2021. For prior events, see Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election (2017–2019) and Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election.

In direct response to Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar and the 2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania, the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the purview of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the election processes of Pennsylvania. All of these have either been dismissed or dropped. The last two remaining cases were dismissed without comment by the Supreme Court on February 22, 2021. On April 19, 2021, more than five months after the November 3, 2020 election, the Supreme Court declined to hear the outstanding case brought by former Republican congressional candidate Jim Bognet, dismissing it without comment.

The Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the election processes of Michigan. All of these were either dismissed or dropped.

In direct response to election changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020 United States presidential election in Arizona, and "Sharpiegate"; the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the election processes of Arizona. All of these were either dismissed or dropped.

The Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the election processes of Nevada. Many of the processes contested were created due to the COVID-19 pandemic. All of these were either dismissed or dropped.

In direct response to election changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 United States presidential election in Georgia; the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous civil lawsuits contesting the election processes of Georgia. All of these were either dismissed or dropped.

In direct response to election changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin; Donald Trump's campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the election processes of Wisconsin. All were either dismissed or dropped.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republican efforts to restrict voting following the 2020 presidential election</span> Ongoing effort by the U.S. Republican Party

Following the 2020 United States presidential election and the unsuccessful attempts by Donald Trump and various other Republican officials to overturn it, Republican lawmakers initiated a sweeping effort to make voting laws more restrictive within several states across the country. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, as of October 4, 2021, more than 425 bills that would restrict voting access have been introduced in 49 states—with 33 of these bills enacted across 19 states so far. The bills are largely centered around limiting mail-in voting, strengthening voter ID laws, shortening early voting, eliminating automatic and same-day voter registration, curbing the use of ballot drop boxes, and allowing for increased purging of voter rolls. Republicans in at least eight states have also introduced bills that would give lawmakers greater power over election administration after they were unsuccessful in their attempts to overturn election results in swing states won by Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the 2020 election. The efforts garnered press attention and public outrage from Democrats, and by 2023 Republicans had adopted a more "under the radar" approach to achieve their goals.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Public Interest Legal Foundation Inc". ProPublica. 9 May 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  2. ↑ "Contact Information page". PILF. 16 April 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 Willis, Derek Willis (May 2, 2020). "A Conservative Legal Group Significantly Miscalculated Data in a..." ProPublica. Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  4. 1 2 Pilkington, Ed (23 September 2018). "Thousands at risk from rightwing push to purge eligible voters from US rolls". The Guardian .
  5. ↑ Dinan, Stephen (June 18, 2017). "Maureen Erickson kicked off Virginia voting rolls as 'declared noncitizen'". The Washington Times . Retrieved October 14, 2020.
  6. 1 2 Greenberg, Jon (October 4, 2017). "Anti-vote fraud group levels false charge of corrupted rolls". PolitiFact .
  7. 1 2 3 4 Timm, Jane C. (August 27, 2017). "Vote fraud crusader J. Christian Adams sparks outrage". NBC News. Retrieved 2017-11-25.
  8. ↑ Rivero, Daniel (April 23, 2020). "Major Florida Voting Rights Case Going To Trial During Pandemic". wusfnews.wusf.usf.edu. Retrieved 2020-05-18.
  9. ↑ "LULAC of Richmond v. Public Interest Legal Foundation". Southern Coalition for Social Justice. March 4, 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  10. ↑ Sneed, Tierney (July 17, 2019). "Ex-Trump Voter Fraud Commissioner Settles Lawsuit Over 'Alien Invasion' Reports". Talking Points Memo .
  11. ↑ Petitioners. (27 December 2023). "On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado." U.S. Supreme Court website Retrieved 6 January 2024.
  12. ↑ Press Release. (5 January 2024). "PILF to SCOTUS: President Trump must be kept on the Ballot". Public Interest Legal Foundation website Retrieved 6 January 2024.
  13. ↑ Richard Winger. (5 January 2024). "Twenty-five States Files Amicus in Trump Ballot Access Case with Arguments Not Made by Others", Ballot Access News website. Retrieved 6 January 2024.
  14. ↑ Jacobs, Ben (2017-07-11). "Controversial rightwing activist to join Trump's election integrity commission". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2017-11-25.
  15. 1 2 "Vote fraud crusader J. Christian Adams sparks outrage". NBC News. Retrieved 2017-11-25.
  16. 1 2 Jacobs, Ben (2017-07-11). "Controversial rightwing activist to join Trump's election integrity commission". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2017-11-25.
  17. ↑ "Hans A. von Spakovsky". The Heritage Foundation . Retrieved June 30, 2017.
  18. ↑ "Why Republicans Can't Find the Big Voter Fraud Conspiracy". POLITICO Magazine. Retrieved 2017-07-26.
  19. ↑ "Trump stokes voter fraud fears as commission convenes". POLITICO. Retrieved 2017-07-26.
  20. ↑ Huseman, Mike Spies,Jake Pearson,Jessica (15 September 2020). "No Democrats Allowed: A Conservative Lawyer Holds Secret Voter Fraud Meetings With State Election Officials". ProPublica. Retrieved 2020-09-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ↑ Bowden, John (June 30, 2017). "Trump names former FEC member to voter fraud probe". The Hill . Retrieved June 30, 2017.
  22. ↑ Banks, Gabrielle (18 March 2020). "Harris County officials settle lawsuit, agreeing to disclose records of foreign nationals who tried to vote in Texas". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  23. ↑ Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson, "January 2023 Voter Registration Figures.
  24. ↑ "Organization Drops Lawsuit Over Dead, Duplicate Registered Voters". 62 CBS Detroit. 1 July 2020. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  25. ↑ "Public Interest Legal Foundation Drops Meritless Voter Purge Lawsuit Against Detroit, The group claimed the city was not purging voters aggressively enough. But when pressed for evidence, they withdrew.", Brennan Center for Justice, June 20, 2020.
  26. ↑ Harrison, Judy (20 February 2020). "Conservative legal group sues Matt Dunlap over denial of Maine's registered voter list". 13 WGME. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  27. ↑ Routh, Julian (25 February 2020). "Allegheny County sued over maintenance of voter rolls". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  28. ↑ "4 Groups Seek To Intervene In Lawsuit Filed Against Allegheny Co. Over Purging Voter Polls", KDKA News, Marcy 2, 2020.
  29. ↑ "Allegheny County, PA Voter Roll Cleanup Lawsuit Ends", Public Interest Legal Foundation
  30. ↑ LeBlanc, Beth (27 August 2020). "Group sues Benson to get 193 voting records allegedly altered by Southfield clerk". The Detroit News. Retrieved 24 August 2020.
  31. ↑ "Over 400 Complaints Prompt Maricopa County lawsuit Filed in #Sharpiegate", Arizona Independent News Network, November 5, 2020.
  32. ↑ Bree Burkitt, Jen Fifield, "Sharpie lawsuit officially dropped by plaintiffs hours after Biden win announced", Arizona Republic, November 7, 2020.
  33. ↑ Jack Dura, "Judge dismisses election official's mail ballot lawsuit in North Dakota", Associated Press, February 2, 2024.
  34. ↑ "Board of Directors - Public Interest Legal Foundation". April 2015.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.