Research Policy (journal)

Last updated

Content

The journal covers a wide range of subjects such as technological change, R&D, management of knowledge, entrepreneurship, science policy, and multiple subfields relating to innovation studies (e.g., innovation economics, innovation management, technology innovation). [9] It is a top-ranked or top-cited journal in the fields of business and economics, [10] [11] management, [12] [13] technology and innovation management (TIM), [14] [15] [16] academic entrepreneurship, [17] and technology assessment. [18]

History

Based on research conducted by Joseph Schumpeter, Freeman worked to demonstrate the importance of innovation and R&D for economic development. From 1959 to 1966, Freeman worked at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, where he carried out pioneering studies on industrial research. [19] He played an important role in the development of the OECD's Frascati Manual. [20] In 1966, Freeman founded the Science Policy Research Unit at the University of Sussex and became its first director. It became a global hub for innovation research and attracted scholars from across the world. Research Policy was established in 1971 with Freeman as editor-in-chief. [1] In 1984, Keith Pavitt succeeded Freeman as the R.M. Phillips Professor of Science Policy and as the main editor of the journal, a post he would hold until his retirement in 2002. [21] [22]

Research Policy: X was Research Policy's open access mirror journal that was discontinued in 2021. [23] [24]

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is indexed and abstracted in the following bibliographic databases:

According to the Journal Citation Reports , the journal has a 2022 impact factor of 7.2. [31]

Notable studies

Notable studies published in the journal include:

Related Research Articles

Research funding is a term generally covering any funding for scientific research, in the areas of natural science, technology, and social science. Different methods can be used to disburse funding, but the term often connotes funding obtained through a competitive process, in which potential research projects are evaluated and only the most promising receive funding. It is often measured via Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD).

User innovation refers to innovation by intermediate users or consumer users, rather than by suppliers. This is a concept closely aligned to co-design and co-creation, and has been proven to result in more innovative solutions than traditional consultation methodologies.

Open innovation is a term used to promote an information age mindset toward innovation that runs counter to the secrecy and silo mentality of traditional corporate research labs. The benefits and driving forces behind increased openness have been noted and discussed as far back as the 1960s, especially as it pertains to interfirm cooperation in R&D. Use of the term 'open innovation' in reference to the increasing embrace of external cooperation in a complex world has been promoted in particular by Henry Chesbrough, adjunct professor and faculty director of the Center for Open Innovation of the Haas School of Business at the University of California, and Maire Tecnimont Chair of Open Innovation at Luiss.

A knowledge productionmode is a term from the sociology of science which refers to the way (scientific) knowledge is produced. So far, three modes have been conceptualized. Mode 1 production of knowledge is knowledge production motivated by scientific knowledge alone which is not primarily concerned by the applicability of its findings. Mode 1 is founded on a conceptualization of science as separated into discrete disciplines. Mode 2 was coined in 1994 in juxtaposition to Mode 1 by Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow. In Mode 2, multidisciplinary teams are brought together for short periods of time to work on specific problems in the real world for knowledge production in the knowledge society. Mode 2 can be explained by the way research funds are distributed among scientists and how scientists focus on obtaining these funds in terms of five basic features: knowledge produced in the context of application; transdisciplinarity; heterogeneity and organizational diversity; social accountability and reflexivity; and quality control. Subsequently, Carayannis and Campbell described a Mode 3 knowledge in 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Teece</span> New Zealand–American business academic

David John Teece is a New Zealand-born US-based organizational economist and the Professor in Global Business and director of the Tusher Center for the Management of Intellectual Capital at the Walter A. Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.

Dominant design is a technology management concept introduced by James M. Utterback and William J. Abernathy in 1975, identifying key technological features that become a de facto standard. A dominant design is the one that wins the allegiance of the marketplace, the one to which competitors and innovators must adhere if they hope to command significant market following.

Christopher Freeman a British economist, recognised as one of the founders of the post-war school of Innovation Studies. He played a lead role in the development of the neo-Schumpeterian tradition focusing on the crucial role of innovation for economic development and of scientific and technological activities for well-being.

Entrepreneurship is the creation or extraction of economic value in ways that generally entail beyond the minimal amount of risk, and potentially involving values besides simply economic ones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Dodgson</span> Australian academic and author

Mark Jonathan Dodgson is an Australian academic and author. His research on the innovation process has influenced innovation management and policy worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soumodip Sarkar</span> Economist and Management Scholar

Soumodip Sarkar is an economist and management scholar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Max von Zedtwitz</span> American technology manager

Max von Zedtwitz is a scholar of global R&D and innovation with a focus on emerging countries. He is Managing Director of GLORAD, a research network with locations in China, the United States, Brazil and Europe, and professor at universities in Europe and China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Fritsch</span>

Michael Fritsch is professor of Economics and Chair of Business Dynamics, Innovation, and Economic Change at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany. He is also an Associate Editor of the academic journal Small Business Economics.

Ulrich Lichtenthaler is a German economist who is Professor of Management and Entrepreneurship at the International School of Management in Cologne. He held the Chair of Management and Organization at the University of Mannheim until March 2015.

Rajneesh Narula, is an economist and academic. He is Professor of International Business Regulation and Director of the John H. Dunning Center for International Business at Henley Business School, University of Reading in Reading, UK.

University technology transfer offices (TTOs), or technology licensing offices (TLOs), are responsible for technology transfer and other aspects of the commercialization of research that takes place in a university. TTOs engage in a variety of commercial activities that are meant to facilitate the process of bringing research developments to market, often acting as a channel between academia and industry. Most major research universities have established TTOs in the past decades in an effort to increase the impact of university research and provide opportunities for financial gain. While TTOs are commonplace, many studies have questioned their financial benefit to the university.

Jennifer Whyte is Director of the John Grill Institute for Project Leadership and Head of School of Project Management at the University of Sydney, Australia. Her focus is on working with industry, policy and government to improve the way projects are conceived, set-up, delivered and add value. She had led research on systems integration, construction transformation, and project analytics.

Phillip Phan is Alonzo and Virginia Decker Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship at the Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, with expertise in the areas of strategy and entrepreneurship. Phan's research examines corporate governance, entrepreneurship and technology transfer, regional economic development, and innovation management in healthcare. He is currently Editor-in-Chief of Academy of Management Perspectives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fiona Murray</span> Technology innovator researcher

Dame Fiona Elizabeth Murray is the Associate Dean for Innovation at the MIT Sloan School of Management. She is a member of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom's Council for Science and Technology and Vice-Chair of the Board of Directors of the NATO Innovation Fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gaétan de Rassenfosse</span> Belgian economist

Gaétan de Rassenfosse is a Belgian economist, whose research is specialized in the field of economics of innovation. He is a professor at EPFL, where he heads the Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Laboratory at the College of Management of Technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elicia Maine</span> Canadian innovation academic

Elicia Maine is a Canadian academic. She is the W.J. VanDusen Professor of Innovation & Entrepreneurship within Simon Fraser University's Beedie School of Business. She was the founding educational coordinator for New Ventures BC, and the founding Academic Director of Invention to Innovation (i2I), an award-winning graduate program in science & technology commercialization offered in traditional and online formats. Within Simon Fraser University, she serves as Associate Vice President, Knowledge Mobilization & Innovation, providing oversight of SFU Innovates.

References

  1. 1 2 Lopes, Ilidio Tamas (2012). ECIE2012-7th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship: ECIE2012. Academic Conferences Limited. p. 424. ISBN   978-1-908272-87-4.
  2. Liu, Zhigao; Yin, Yimei; Liu, Weidong; Dunford, Michael (January 22, 2015). "Visualizing The Intellectual Structure And Evolution of Innovation Systems Research: A Bibliometric Analysis". Scientometrics . Springer Science+Business Media. 103 (1): 135–158. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y. S2CID   16541541.
  3. Birch, Kean (October 14, 2016). Innovation, Regional Development and the Life Sciences: Beyond clusters. Routledge. ISBN   978-1-317-61381-7.
  4. Landström, Hans; Åström, Fredrik; Harirchi, Gouya (December 19, 2013). "Innovation and entrepreneurship studies: one or two fields of research?". International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Springer Science+Business Media. 11 (3): 493–509. doi:10.1007/s11365-013-0282-3. S2CID   55983417.
  5. Triguero, Ángela; González-Moreno, Ángela (May 13, 2019). Research on Open-innovation Strategies and Eco-innovation in Agro-food Industries. Chartridge Books Oxford. p. 13. ISBN   978-1-911033-49-3.
  6. Dabic, Marina; Svarc, Jadranka; González-Loureiro, Miguel (April 5, 2018). Entrepreneurial Universities in Innovation-Seeking Countries: Challenges and Opportunities. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 10. ISBN   978-1-137-57982-9.
  7. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  8. Ormans, Laurent (February 22, 2012). "50 Journals used in FT Research Rank". Financial Times . Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  9. "Research Policy: Author Information Pack". Elsevier . Retrieved August 19, 2021.
  10. Gil-Lafuente, Anna M.; Gil-Lafuente, Jaime; Merigó-Lindahl, José M. (July 13, 2012). Soft Computing in Management and Business Economics. Vol. 2. Springer Science+Business Media. p. 9. ISBN   978-3-642-30451-4.
  11. "Top Peer Reviewed Journals—Economics & Business Reports". Library Reports. Iowa State University. October 16, 2013.
  12. Lee, Viktor (February 14, 2012). How Firms Can Strategically Influence Open Source Communities: The Employment of 'Men on the Inside'. Springer Gabler. p. 18. ISBN   978-3-8349-7140-1.
  13. "Top Management Journals". Alberta School of Business . Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  14. Acton, Q. Ashton, ed. (May 1, 2013). Issues in Innovation, Indicators, and Management in Technology: 2013 Edition. ScholarlyEditions. p. 27. ISBN   978-1-4901-0991-6.
  15. Liebowitz, Jay (April 8, 2015). A Guide to Publishing for Academics: Inside the Publish or Perish Phenomenon. CRC Press. pp. 58–63. ISBN   978-1-4822-5627-7.
  16. Linton, Jonathan D.; Thongpapanl, Narongsak (Tek) (2004). "Perspective: Ranking the Technology Innovation Management Journals". Journal of Product Innovation Management . Wiley. 21 (2): 123–139. doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00062.x.
  17. Ujwary-Gil, Anna; Nalepka, Adam (2018). Business and Non-profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers' Demands. Vol. 17. Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences. p. 243. ISBN   978-83-951082-2-8.
  18. Daim, Tugrul U.; Chiavetta, Denise; Porter, Alan L.; Saritas, Ozcan (July 25, 2016). Anticipating Future Innovation Pathways Through Large Data Analysis. Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 50–52. ISBN   978-3-319-39056-7.
  19. "Christopher Freeman". The Telegraph . September 7, 2010. Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  20. Chaminade, Cristina; Lundvall, Bengt-Åke; Haneef, Shagufta (2018). Advanced Introduction to National Innovation Systems. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN   978-1-78536-202-6.
  21. Fagerberg, Jan (April 27, 2018). Innovation, Economic Development and Policy: Selected Essays. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 131. ISBN   978-1-78811-026-6.
  22. "Professor Keith Pavitt". The Independent . January 31, 2003. Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  23. Rodrigues, Rosângela Schwarz; Abadal, Ernest; de Araújo, Breno Kricheldorf Hermes (June 5, 2020). Useche, Sergio A. (ed.). "Open access publishers: The new players". PLOS ONE . 15 (6): e0233432. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1533432R. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233432 . PMC   7274412 . PMID   32502146.
  24. "Research Policy: X". Science Direct . Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  25. "Content/Database Overview - Compendex Source List". Engineering Village. Elsevier . Retrieved October 24, 2022.
  26. 1 2 "Web of Science Master Journal List". Intellectual Property & Science. Clarivate . Retrieved October 24, 2022.
  27. 1 2 3 4 "Research Policy". MIAR: Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals. University of Barcelona . Retrieved October 24, 2022.
  28. "Journals Indexed". EconLit. American Economic Association. Retrieved October 24, 2022.
  29. "Inspec list of journals" (PDF). Inspec. Institution of Engineering and Technology . Retrieved October 24, 2022.
  30. "Source details: Research Policy". Scopus Preview. Elsevier . Retrieved October 24, 2022.
  31. "Research Policy". 2022 Journal Citation Reports (Science ed.). Clarivate. 2023 via Web of Science.
  32. Sherwood, Martin (December 9, 1971). "Is science policy democratic?". New Scientist . Vol. 52, no. 773. p. 70. Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  33. Connor, Steve (May 26, 1983). "Lovell hits back at Jodrell Bank study". New Scientist . Vol. 98, no. 1359. p. 523. Retrieved August 18, 2021.
  34. Broad, William J. (May 13, 1997). "Study Finds Public Science Is Pillar Of Industry". The New York Times . Retrieved August 19, 2021.
  35. Jacobs, Jerry A. (July 1, 2017). "Manipulated Journal Rankings?". Inside Higher Ed . Retrieved August 19, 2021.
  36. Hare, Julia (April 12, 2017). "Mental health issues soar for PhD students" . The Australian . Archived from the original on August 20, 2021. Retrieved August 20, 2021.

Further reading