Resource consent

Last updated

A resource consent is the authorisation given to certain activities or uses of natural and physical resources required under the New Zealand Resource Management Act (the "RMA"). Some activities may either be specifically authorised by the RMA [1] or be permitted activities authorised by rules in plans. [2] Any activities that are not permitted by the RMA, or by a rule in a plan, require a resource consent before they are carried out.

Contents

Definition and nature

The term "resource consent" is defined as;

A resource consent, once granted to an applicant, is neither real nor personal property. [4] Therefore, resource consents cannot be 'owned'; they are 'held' by 'consent holders'. [5]

Types

A resource consent means any of the following: [6]

Plan classifications

Regional and district plans may give an activity that requires a resource consent one of six possible classifications. [7]

Activity Classifications
Activity ClassificationConsent requiredConsent must be grantedConsent can be grantedConsideration restrictedEffects must be minorNotes
PermittedNoN/AN/AN/AN/AActivity allowed without a consent
ControlledYesYesYesYesNoAuthority must grant consent, but may impose conditions in some matters
Restricted discretionaryYesNoYesYesNoAuthority may deny or grant consent, with conditions, but only decided on matters set out in the plan.
DiscretionaryYesNoYesNoNoAuthority has full discretion to deny or grant consent, and may impose conditions.
Non-complyingYesNoYesNoYesAuthority may deny or grant consent, where effects are minor and activity not inconsistent with plan.
ProhibitedN/AN/ANoN/AN/APlan change required to reclassify

The above table is of a very summary nature, and exceptions apply in some circumstances.

There are two further classifications, restricted coastal activity and recognised customary activity, which are subject to particular conditions.

Application process

Applications for resource consents are usually granted by the regional councils and territorial authorities acting as consent authorities. Any person may apply for a resource consent. [8] Applications must be in the prescribed form and include an assessment of environmental effects. [9] The resource consent process is designed to enable environmental managers to consider environmental issues associated with particular proposals for resource use. [10]

While this principle is commendable, there is a complexity of issues that surround assessing the effects on the environment of a consent application and the consideration of applications (e.g. social, cultural, and ecological considerations, significance of effects, the place of community values, the sufficiency of evidence and the onus of proof).

A resource consent may be granted with a set of conditions that need to be complied with in order to ensure minimal environmental effect. [11]

Appeals

Decisions on resource consent applications may be appealed [12] to the Environment Court (formerly the Planning Tribunal until 1993). Appeals are considered on a 'de novo' basis, where the Environment Court hears any evidence it requires and makes its own decision which replaces that of the local authority. [13] Decisions of the Environment Court may only be appealed to the High Court of New Zealand on a point of law. [14]

Statistics

Of New Zealand's regional councils and unitary authorities, Canterbury Regional Council receives and processes the most applications for resource consents. In the year ended 30 June 2006, Canterbury Regional Council processed 3,381 applications, more than double the number processed by any other consent authority. Environment Waikato had the next highest number; 1,384 applications in 2006. [15]

Regional-consents-NZ-2006.jpeg

Criticism

One of the major complaints (mainly raised by corporations) regarding the resource consent process has been that submissions made in opposition against a project can be made by any entity, even if it is not affected. This has, in the opinion of the critics, caused the resource consent process to be used as an anti-competitive and anti-investment tool by which both individuals and other corporations can stop projects while appearing to act in the common interest. The true motivation of such submissions and associated appeals, it is alleged, is trade competition, a factor which is expressly not to be considered when testing the merits of a resource consent application. [16]

Other criticisms include:

Some commentators consider that the requirement for resource consents is slowing or preventing the construction of large infrastructure projects, such as highways, roads, wind farms and other power generation plants, which are important to New Zealand's economic wellbeing, as well as adding to the cost of such projects.[ citation needed ]

Proposed 2009 reforms

In February 2009 the National-led government announced the Resource Management (Simplify & Streamline) Amendment Bill which seeks to improve the resource consent process. [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regions of New Zealand</span> Top administrative divisions of New Zealand

New Zealand is divided into sixteen regions for local government purposes. Eleven are administered by regional councils, and five are administered by unitary authorities, which are territorial authorities that also perform the functions of regional councils. The Chatham Islands Council is not a region but is similar to a unitary authority, authorised under its own legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Resource Management Act 1991</span> 1991 New Zealand law promoting sustainable management of natural and physical resources

The Resource Management Act (RMA) passed in 1991 in New Zealand is a significant, and at times, controversial Act of Parliament. The RMA promotes the sustainable management of natural and physical resources such as land, air and water. New Zealand's Ministry for the Environment describes the RMA as New Zealand's principal legislation for environmental management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact assessment</span> Assessment of the environmental consequences of a decision before action

Environmental Impact assessment (EIA) is the assessment of the environmental consequences of a plan, policy, program, or actual projects prior to the decision to move forward with the proposed action. In this context, the term "environmental impact assessment" is usually used when applied to actual projects by individuals or companies and the term "strategic environmental assessment" (SEA) applies to policies, plans and programmes most often proposed by organs of state. It is a tool of environmental management forming a part of project approval and decision-making. Environmental assessments may be governed by rules of administrative procedure regarding public participation and documentation of decision making, and may be subject to judicial review.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Otago Regional Council</span> Regional council in New Zealand

Otago Regional Council (ORC) is the regional council for Otago in the South Island of New Zealand. The council's principal office is Regional House on Stafford Street in Dunedin with 250–275 staff, with smaller offices in Queenstown and Alexandra. They are responsible for sustainably managing Otago’s natural resources of land, air and water on behalf of the community. Property owners pay rates to both the local and regional councils.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental Protection Act 1990</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Environmental Protection Act 1990 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that as of 2008 defines, within England and Wales and Scotland, the fundamental structure and authority for waste management and control of emissions into the environment.

Kaitiakitanga is a New Zealand Māori term used for the concept of guardianship of the sky, the sea, and the land. A kaitiaki is a guardian, and the process and practices of protecting and looking after the environment are referred to as kaitiakitanga.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hurunui River</span> River in Canterbury, New Zealand

The Hurunui River is the fourth largest of the four principal rivers in north Canterbury, New Zealand, with a catchment area of 2,670 square kilometres (1,030 sq mi). The river flows from the eastern side of the Southern Alps, to the Pacific Ocean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environment Court of New Zealand</span> Specialist court for land use and environmental issues

The Environment Court of New Zealand is a specialist court for plans, resource consents and environmental issues. It mainly deals with issues arising under the Resource Management Act, meaning that it covers a wide range of potential future effects of planning applications, which can include such areas as traffic congestion, noise/pollution emissions and social and commercial consequences, rather than just the 'ecological' aspects that could be implied by the 'environmental' term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental Defence Society</span>

Environmental Defence Society (EDS) is a not-for-profit environmental organisation based in New Zealand. It focuses on issues surrounding the Resource Management Act 1991 and is made up of resource management professionals who are committed to improving environmental outcomes within New Zealand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environment Canterbury</span> Regional government in New Zealand

Environment Canterbury, frequently abbreviated to ECan, is the promotional name for the Canterbury Regional Council. It is the regional council for Canterbury, the largest region in the South Island of New Zealand. It is part of New Zealand's structure of local government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Plains Water</span>

Central Plains Water, or, more fully, the Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme, is a large-scale proposal for water diversion, damming, reticulation and irrigation for the Central Plains of Canterbury, New Zealand. Construction started on the scheme in 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geothermal power in New Zealand</span> Overview of geothermal power in New Zealand

Geothermal power in New Zealand plays a significant part of the energy generation capacity of the country, constituting 25% of the total energy supply and 19% of electricity production in 2021. This positions New Zealand as the top user of geothermal energy among International Energy Agency (IEA) countries in both total energy supply and electricity generation.

Project Hayes was a controversial wind farm proposed for the Lammermoor Range of Otago, New Zealand. The project was developed by Meridian Energy from 2006 to 2012 at a cost of $8.9 million.

The Escarpment Mine Project is an opencast coal mine at the Mount Rochfort Conservation Area on the Denniston Plateau on the West Coast of New Zealand in the vicinity of the disused Escarpment Mine. Bathurst Resources Limited intended to extract and export between one and four million tonnes of coal a year from open cast mining in an area of 200 hectares of conservation land on the southern Denniston Plateau. The mine would be the second largest opencast coal mine in New Zealand after Solid Energy's Stockton Mine on the Stockton Plateau. Environmental groups such as Forest and Bird and the West Coast Environment Network opposed the project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fracking in New Zealand</span>

Fracking has been carried out in New Zealand for over 27 years, mostly in Taranaki and also in coal seams in Waikato and Southland. Concerns have been raised about its negative effects and some local government jurisdictions have called for a moratorium on fracking but this has been rejected by the government. The environmental effects of fracking are regulated by the Resource Management Act (RMA) through the requirement for resource consents.

<i>Environmental Defence Society Inc v New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd</i>

Environmental Defence Society v New Zealand King Salmon was a case in the Supreme Court of New Zealand concerning the proper interpretation of the Resource Management Act 1991 by planning bodies.

<i>North Shore City Council v Auckland Regional Council</i>

North Shore City Council v Auckland Regional Council was a case in the Environment Court of New Zealand concerning the proper interpretation of section five of the Resource Management Act 1991 by planning bodies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Natural and Built Environment Act 2023</span> Repealed Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Natural and Built Environment Act 2023 (NBA), now repealed, was one of the three laws which will replace New Zealand's Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). The NBA aimed to promote the protection and enhancement of the natural and built environment, while providing for housing and preparing for the effects of climate change.

The Office of the Chief Freshwater Commissioner is a New Zealand government commission established by the Resource Management Amendment Act 2020, as part of a new Freshwater Planning Process (FPP). The Resource Management Amendment Act 2020 required regional councils and unitary authorities to have freshwater plans in place by 2024. These plans were to give effect to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management. The Chief Freshwater Commissioner must be a current or retired Environment Court judge, and is appointed by the Minister for the Environment. The Office operates independently and does not provide policy advice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spatial Planning Act 2023</span> Repealed Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Spatial Planning Act 2023 (SPA), now repealed, was one of three laws introduced by the Sixth Labour Government in order to replace New Zealand's Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). Its purpose was to provide for regional spatial strategies that assisted the purpose of the Natural and Built Environment Act 2023 (NBA) and promote integration in the performance of functions under the NBA, the Land Transport Management Act 2003, the Local Government Act 2002, and the Water Services Entities Act 2022.

References

  1. Sections 9 to 15 Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  2. Section 77B(1) Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  3. Appendix 4: Glossary of RMA Terms Your Guide to the Resource Management Act, updated August 2006, Ref. ME7662, retrieved 2 January 2008.
  4. Section 122(1) Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  5. The Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand) specifically refers to 'consent holders'. See Sections 120(1)(a), 122, 124, 127, 128, 129, 130, 132, 136, and 138.
  6. Section 87 Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  7. Sections 77B(1) to 77B(7) Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  8. Section 88() Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  9. Section 88(2) Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  10. Birdsong, B. (1998) Adjudicating Sustainability: The Environment Court and New Zealand's Resource Management Act Archived 28 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine , Prepared by Bret Birdsong October 1998 copyright © Ian Axford (New Zealand) Fellowship in Public Policy, page 13.
  11. Section 108, Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  12. Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  13. Birdsong, B. (1998), page 22.
  14. Section 299 Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand)
  15. RMA Survey of Local Authorities: 2005/2006 survey, Ministry for the Environment, Ref. ME797, Appendix One.
  16. Eriksen, Alanah (21 February 2008). "Mayor wants development objections limited". New Zealand Herald News. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  17. "Reform tackles costs, uncertainties and delays of RMA". New Zealand Government. 3 February 2009. Retrieved 3 February 2009.