Rodney Huddleston

Last updated

Rodney Desmond Huddleston
Born (1937-04-04) 4 April 1937 (age 87)
Bowdon, Cheshire, England
Citizenship
  • British
  • Australian
Alma mater
Known for
Spouses
  • Joan Mulholland (1965–78)
  • Cheryll Jacklin (1978-1985)
  • Vivienne Pool (1988–)
Awards
  • Leonard Bloomfield Book Award (2004; shared with Geoff Pullum)
  • Fellow, Australian Academy of the Humanities, awarded a Personal Chair
  • 'Excellence in Teaching' award
  • Centenary Medal for service to Australian society and the humanities in the study of linguistics
Scientific career
Institutions
Thesis Descriptive and comparative analysis of text in French and English  (1963)
Doctoral advisor Michael Halliday
Doctoral studentsFrancis Bond

Rodney D. Huddleston (born 4 April 1937) is a British linguist and grammarian specializing in the study and description of English.

Contents

Huddleston is the primary author of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language ( ISBN   0-521-43146-8), which presents a comprehensive descriptive grammar of English.

Early life and education

Huddleston was born in Cheshire, England and attended Manchester Grammar School. Upon graduation, he spent two years in the military before enrolling at Cambridge with a scholarship. [1]

After graduating from Cambridge University in 1960 with a First Class Honors degree in Modern and Medieval Languages, Huddleston earned his PhD in Applied Linguistics [2] from the University of Edinburgh in 1963 under the supervision of Michael Halliday. [1]

Academic career

Huddleston held lectureships at the University of Edinburgh, University College London, and the University of Reading. He moved to The University of Queensland in 1969, where he remained for the rest of his career. He was the recipient of the first round of 'Excellence in Teaching' awards at the University of Queensland in 1988. In 1990 he was awarded a Personal Chair. [3] He is currently an emeritus professor at the University of Queensland, where he taught until 1997.

Under Halliday

For some time, Huddleston ran a project under Halliday in the Communications Research Centre at The University of London called the “OSTI Programme in the Linguistic Properties of Scientific English.” [4] (OSTI was the UK government's Office for Scientific and Technical Information.) [5] As a student of Halliday's, Huddleston was a proponent of Systemic Functional Grammar, [4] but as his thinking developed, he came to reject it. [6]

The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language

Background

In 1988, Huddleston published a very critical review of the 1985 book A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . [7] He wrote:

[T]here are some respects in which it is seriously flawed and disappointing. A number of quite basic categories and concepts do not seem to have been thought through with sufficient care; this results in a remarkable amount of unclarity and inconsistency in the analysis, and in the organization of the grammar. [7]

A year later, he decided that he would have to produce a grammar that did a better job. He was awarded a special projects grant by The University of Queensland to the project and began work on what was provisionally titled The Cambridge Grammar of English. [n 1] From 1989 to 1995, workshops were held two or three times a year in Brisbane and Sydney to develop ideas for the framework and content. [8]

Intellectually, these were intense and exhausting sessions but they were associated with extremely enjoyable social gatherings. In some ways it is the social side of these events that lingers in the memory long after the details of linguistic discussion are forgotten. We remember particularly dawn jogs to Alexandra Beach from Rodney’s house at Sunshine Beach, pool volleyball and table tennis games fought with great ferocity, and walks through Noosa National Park with spectacular sunsets over Noosa Bay. [1] : xi 

Geoff Pullum joined the project in 1995, [9] after Huddleston "bemoaned the problems he was having in maintaining the momentum of this huge project, at that time already five years underway". [10]

Publication and reception

The book was published in 2002. In 2004, Peter Culicover wrote:

The Cambridge grammar of the English language (CGEL) is a monumentally impressive piece of work. Already published reviews of this work do not overstate its virtues: 'a notable achievement'; 'authoritative, interesting, reasonably priced (for a book of this size), beautifully designed, well proofread, and enjoyable to handle'; 'superbly produced and designed'; 'one of the most superb works of academic scholarship ever to appear on the English linguistics scene ... a monumental work that offers easily the most comprehensive and thought-provoking treatment of English grammar to date. Nothing rivals this work, with respect to breadth, depth and consistency of coverage'. I fully agree with these sentiments. Huddleston, Pullum, and collaborators definitely deserve a prize for this achievement. [11] : 127 

That same year, the book won the Leonard Bloomfield Book Award of the Linguistic Society of America. [12]

Views

Huddleston's grammatical frameworks, such as that in the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, have been monotonic phrase-structure grammars, similar to X-bar theory but with explicit notation for syntactic functions such as subject, modifier, and complement. [13] Monotonic phrase-structure grammars are based on the idea that the structure of sentences can be represented as a hierarchy of constituents, with each level of the hierarchy corresponding to a different level of grammatical organization. X-bar theory is a specific type of phrase-structure grammar that posits a uniform structure for all phrasal categories, with each phrase containing a "head" and optional specifier and/or complement.

The key difference between monotonic phrase-structure grammars and generative grammars like transformational-generative grammar (TGG) is the absence of transformations or movement operations in the former. Monotonic grammars maintain that the structure of a sentence remains fixed from its initial formation, whereas generative grammars propose that sentences can undergo various transformations during the derivation process.

He believes that some kind of fusion of functions accounts for noun phrases that lack noun heads. [14]

Other

In 1999, a festschrift volume was produced "by colleagues past and present, friends and admirers of Rodney Huddleston, in order to honour his consistently outstanding contribution to grammatical theory and description": The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston. [15]

Huddleston and his wife Vivienne now reside on Sunshine Coast, near Noosa Heads in Queensland, Australia. [16] [17]

Notes

  1. ↑ The eventual title – whose obvious abbreviation CGEL was already in wide use for A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language – was imposed by the publisher. Pullum, Geoffrey K. (29 July 2002). "Some points of agreement about the Cambridge Grammar". Linguist List. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 8 March 2023.

Related Research Articles

Adpositions are a class of words used to express spatial or temporal relations or mark various semantic roles. The most common adpositions are prepositions and postpositions.

In linguistics, an object is any of several types of arguments. In subject-prominent, nominative-accusative languages such as English, a transitive verb typically distinguishes between its subject and any of its objects, which can include but are not limited to direct objects, indirect objects, and arguments of adpositions ; the latter are more accurately termed oblique arguments, thus including other arguments not covered by core grammatical roles, such as those governed by case morphology or relational nouns . In ergative-absolutive languages, for example most Australian Aboriginal languages, the term "subject" is ambiguous, and thus the term "agent" is often used instead to contrast with "object", such that basic word order is often spoken of in terms such as Agent-Object-Verb (AOV) instead of Subject-Object-Verb (SOV). Topic-prominent languages, such as Mandarin, focus their grammars less on the subject-object or agent-object dichotomies but rather on the pragmatic dichotomy of topic and comment.

In linguistics, a modifier is an optional element in phrase structure or clause structure which modifies the meaning of another element in the structure. For instance, the adjective "red" acts as a modifier in the noun phrase "red ball", providing extra details about which particular ball is being referred to. Similarly, the adverb "quickly" acts as a modifier in the verb phrase "run quickly". Modification can be considered a high-level domain of the functions of language, on par with predication and reference.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English usage controversies</span> Disputes over "correct" English grammar and style

In the English language, there are grammatical constructions that many native speakers use unquestioningly yet certain writers call incorrect. Differences of usage or opinion may stem from differences between formal and informal speech and other matters of register, differences among dialects, and so forth. Disputes may arise when style guides disagree with each other, or when a guideline or judgement is confronted by large amounts of conflicting evidence or has its rationale challenged.

Historically, grammarians have described a verbal noun or gerundial noun as a verb form that functions as a noun. An example of a verbal noun in English is 'sacking' as in the sentence "The sacking of the city was an epochal event".

Geoffrey Keith Pullum is a British and American linguist specialising in the study of English. Pullum has published over 300 articles and books on various topics in linguistics, including phonology, morphology, semantics, pragmatics, computational linguistics, and philosophy of language. He is Professor Emeritus of General Linguistics at the University of Edinburgh.

Some languages distinguish between the optative mood and an imprecative mood. In these languages, the imprecative mood is used to wish misfortune upon others, whereas the optative mood is used for wishes in general. In such a language, "May he lose the race" is in imprecative mood, whereas "May I win the race" would be in optative mood. A commonly given example of a language with an imprecative mood is Turkish, which uses an otherwise obsolete future-tense suffix -esi solely in the third person for curses:

Relative clauses in the English language are formed principally by means of relative words. The basic relative pronouns are who, which, and that; who also has the derived forms whom and whose. Various grammatical rules and style guides determine which relative pronouns may be suitable in various situations, especially for formal settings. In some cases the relative pronoun may be omitted and merely implied.

In grammar, a complement is a word, phrase, or clause that is necessary to complete the meaning of a given expression. Complements are often also arguments.

The term predicate is used in two ways in linguistics and its subfields. The first defines a predicate as everything in a standard declarative sentence except the subject, and the other defines it as only the main content verb or associated predicative expression of a clause. Thus, by the first definition, the predicate of the sentence Frank likes cake is likes cake, while by the second definition, it is only the content verb likes, and Frank and cake are the arguments of this predicate. The conflict between these two definitions can lead to confusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English subjunctive</span> English embedded clause type marking non-real possibilities

While the English language lacks distinct inflections for mood, an English subjunctive is recognized in most grammars. Definition and scope of the concept vary widely across the literature, but it is generally associated with the description of something other than apparent reality. Traditionally, the term is applied loosely to cases in which one might expect a subjunctive form in related languages, especially Old English and Latin. This includes conditional clauses, wishes, and reported speech. Modern descriptive grammars limit the term to cases in which some grammatical marking can be observed, nevertheless coming to varying definitions.

<i>The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language</i> 2002 compendium on the English language

The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CamGEL) is a descriptive grammar of the English language. Its primary authors are Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum. Huddleston was the only author to work on every chapter. It was published by Cambridge University Press in 2002 and has been cited more than 8,000 times.

In linguistics, an absolute construction is a grammatical construction standing apart from a normal or usual syntactical relation with other words or sentence elements. It can be a non-finite clause that is subordinate in form and modifies an entire sentence, an adjective or possessive pronoun standing alone without a modified substantive, or a transitive verb when its object is implied but not stated. The term absolute derives from Latin absolūtum, meaning "loosened from" or "separated".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English nouns</span> Part of speech

English nouns form the largest category of words in English, both in the number of different words and how often they are used in typical texts. The three main categories of English nouns are common nouns, proper nouns, and pronouns. A defining feature of English nouns is their ability to inflect for number, as through the plural –s morpheme. English nouns primarily function as the heads of noun phrases, which prototypically function at the clause level as subjects, objects, and predicative complements. These phrases are the only English phrases whose structure includes determinatives and predeterminatives, which add abstract-specifying meaning such as definiteness and proximity. Like nouns in general, English nouns typically denote physical objects, but they also denote actions, characteristics, relations in space, and just about anything at all. Taken all together, these features separate English nouns from other lexical categories such as adjectives and verbs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English adjectives</span> Adjectives in the English language

English adjectives form a large open category of words in English which, semantically, tend to denote properties such as size, colour, mood, quality, age, etc. with such members as other, big, new, good, different, Cuban, sure, important, and right. Adjectives head adjective phrases, and the most typical members function as modifiers in noun phrases. Most adjectives either inflect for grade or combine with more and most to form comparatives and superlatives. They are characteristically modifiable by very. A large number of the most typical members combine with the suffix -ly to form adverbs. Most adjectives function as complements in verb phrases, and some license complements of their own.

If is an English preposition, as seen in If it's sunny tomorrow, (then) we'll have a picnic.

An echo question is a question that seeks to confirm or clarify another speaker's utterance, by repeating it back in some form. For example:

A: I'm moving to Greenland. B: You're moving where?

Verbless clauses are comprised, semantically, of a predicand, expressed or not, and a verbless predicate. For example, the underlined string in [With the children so sick,] we've been at home a lot means the same thing as the clause the children are so sick. It attributes the predicate "so sick" to the predicand "the children". In most contexts, *the children so sick would be ungrammatical.

In linguistics, a vocative or vocative expression is a phrase used to identify the addressee of an utterance. The underlined phrases in each of the following English sentences are examples of vocatives:

Sir, your table is ready.

I'm afraid, Mr. Renault, that your card has been declined.

Quit playing around, bozo.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Collins, Peter; Lee, David, eds. (1999). "Curriculum Vitae of Rodney Desmond Huddleston". The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston. Studies in Language Companion Series. Vol. 45. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. p. xvii. ISBN   978-90-272-3048-5. ISSN   0165-7763. LCCN   98-39788. OCLC   39695769.
  2. ↑ R. D., Huddleston (1963). "Descriptive and comparative analysis of text in French and English". hdl:1842/17537.
  3. ↑ Huddleston, Rodney; Pullum, Geoffrey K. (25 April 2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language: About the Author. ISBN   9780521527613 . Retrieved 19 August 2015.
  4. 1 2 O'Donnell, Mick. Life of Michael Alexander Kirkwook Halliday: A Personal Biography (PDF).
  5. ↑ Sinclair, John; Jones, Susan; Daley, Robert (22 September 2004). English Collocation Studies: The OSTI Report. A&C Black. ISBN   978-0-8264-7489-6.
  6. ↑ Huddleston, Rodney (1988). "Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalization in Halliday's Functional Grammar". Journal of Linguistics. 24 (1): 137–174. doi:10.1017/S0022226700011592. ISSN   0022-2267. S2CID   145197674.
  7. 1 2 Huddleston, Rodney (1988). "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language by Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, Jan Svartvik". Language. 64: 345–354. doi:10.2307/415437. JSTOR   415437.
  8. ↑ Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Huddleston, Rodney. "Preface". In Huddleston, Rodney; Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. xv–xvii. ISBN   0-521-43146-8.
  9. ↑ Culicover, Peter W. (2004). Review of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Language. 80 (1): 127–141. doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0018. ISSN   1535-0665. S2CID   140478848.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link) Also a preprint (with different pagination).
  10. ↑ Crystal, David (2002). "Indexing aids" (PDF). Review of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. The Indexer. 23: 108–109.
  11. ↑ Culicover, Peter W. (2004). Review of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Language. 80 (1): 127–141. doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0018. ISSN   1535-0665. S2CID   140478848.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link) Also a preprint (with different pagination).
  12. ↑ "Leonard Bloomfield Book Award Previous Holders". Linguistic Society of America. Retrieved 18 August 2015.
  13. ↑ Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Rogers, James (2009). "Expressive power of the syntactic theory implicit in The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language". Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (PDF). pp. 1–16.
  14. ↑ Payne, John; Huddleston, Rodney; Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2007). "Fusion of functions: The syntax of once, twice and thrice". Journal of Linguistics. 43 (3): 565–603. doi:10.1017/s002222670700477x. ISSN   0022-2267. S2CID   145799573.
  15. ↑ Collins, Peter and David A. Lee (1999). The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston. John Benjamins Publishing.
  16. ↑ "A Student's Introduction to English Grammar". www.lel.ed.ac.uk. Retrieved 18 October 2015.
  17. ↑ Contemporary Authors, New Revision Series v. 141. 2006. pp. 219–221. Archived from the original on 24 February 2016.

Partial bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.