Rotterdam plus

Last updated

"Rotterdam plus" or "Rotterdam+" is a methodology (formula) for determining the steam coal's price for thermal power plants, based on import parity principle, which was used to forecast the wholesale market price of electricity. The formula was in application in Ukraine from May 2016 to June 2019. [1]

Contents

The formula was adopted on March 3, 2016, by Ukrainian national energy regulator, National Commission for Regulation of Energy and Utilities and automatically became invalid from July 1, 2019, due to the entry into force of the law "On electricity market.” [2]

Etymology

In media new methodology was named "Rotterdam plus". In this verbal construction “Rotterdam” means coal index price, and "plus" means logistic costs for delivering coal from port of Rotterdam to Ukraine's thermal power plants. [3]

History and prerequisites

Due to the hostilities in certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, [4] Ukraine lost control of 88 coal mines, which was 60% of the total number of mines in the country. [5] Coal production in 2015 decreased by 38.8% (by 25.2 million tons) compared to 2014 - to 39.8 million tons. [6]

Ukraine faced a shortage of anthracite (hard coal) grades before the heating season of 2014–2015. Thus, in the fall of 2014, anthracite was imported for the first time from South Africa. [7]

In 2015, according to the State Statistics Service, Ukraine imported 14.6 million tons of coal worth $1.63 billion. Of these, 1.07 million tons of anthracite coal was imported at 99.6 million US dollars. [8]

The current tariff for electricity supply by thermal power plants did not cover the cost of purchasing imported coal. The coal price in that time was manually set by the Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry. [9]

The new methodology to forecast wholesale market price of electricity calculating with the market determination of coal price was supposed to ensure the independence of thermal power plants from coal supplies from the ATO[ clarification needed ] zone and deprive Ukraine from problems with the accumulation sufficient amount of coal in front the heating season. [10]

General principle

According to the methodology, the National Commission for Regulation of Energy and Utilities calculated the forecasted wholesale price for electricity in such a way that the tariff for electricity produced by the thermal power plants would cover its cost.

The formula for determining the price consisted of the average price indices for thermal coal in the ports of northwestern Europe (Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp) for the 12 months preceding the calculation of the FWP[ clarification needed ], plus logistics costs for the delivery of coal to Ukrainian thermal power plants. [1]

The APІ2 index had been adjusted according to calorific value of Ukrainian coal, which was indicated in the predicted fuel structure for thermal power plants. This document was approved by the Ministry of Energy.

The logistic costs were based on the average freight rate for the delivery coal from the ARA region to Ukrainian ports, the cost of transshipment in the port (unloading the vessel) and the average railway tariff for shipping coal from the port to the thermal power plants.

The “Rotterdam +” formula did not assume that coal would be physically purchased in Rotterdam and transported to the Ukrainian port “Pivdenny” (Odessa region). The APІ2 index was used as an indicative of the European market, and the logistics costs according to the formula were to cover the costs of delivering coal from producing countries - South Africa, Colombia, the US and Australia - to Ukraine.

This approach was justified by the European Coal and Lignite Association (EURACOAL) calculations . According to the Association, the cost of delivering coal from South Africa, the United States and Colombia to Ukraine were higher than from these countries in the ARA region. [11]

Critics and media-campaign against “Rotterdam+”

The main opponents of the formula for determining the market price of coal were large energy-intensive enterprises - mainly ferroalloy and electrometallurgical enterprises, which belong to oligarchs Igor Kolomoisky and Viktor Pinchuk. [10]

In 2017, they established the Electricity and Utilities Consumers Association. Officially, the members of the association did not open up. According to the former head of the association, Andriy Gerus, large electricity consumers have joined the association [12]

Andriy Gerus has become a key figure in the anti-formula media campaign. [13] Media support was provided by Ihor Kolomoisky's 1 + 1 Media TV channel, as well as by Viktor Pinchuk's ICTV and STB.

In March 2018, a public organization controlled by Gerus, the Association of Energy and Utilities Consumers, launched the Rotterdam Plus online meter to calculate the amount of overpayments by consumers for electricity expected by it. [14] Despite the cancellation of the "Rotterdam +" formula from July 1, 2019, the counter continues to count losses to the present. As of early August 2020, he calculated losses at over ₴67 billion.

The object of criticism and media attacks was the DTEK holding, the largest coal producer and operator the majority of thermal power plants[7]. TV channels controlled by Kolomoisky and Pinchuk accused DTEK of receiving super-profits. Since the owner of 100% of DTEK shares is entrepreneur Rinat Akhmetov, criticism was also directed at him. [15]

Criminal investigation

A year after the adoption of the formula, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, under pressure from a media campaign, opened criminal proceedings against members of the National Commission for Regulation of Energy and Utilities, who adopted the methodology. [16]

During the investigation, NACB conducted several searches, including with the equipment seizure from NEURC. [17]

In the course of 3.5 years, 10 Ukrainian and 4 international examinations were carried out, which, according to the lawyers, did not reveal any harm or loss from the formula. [18]

Termination of investigation

The investigation lasted 3.5 years and was closed on August 27, 2020, due to the lack of evidence of the suspects' guilt and crimes in their actions. [19]

On September 24, the legality of closing a case was confirmed by the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court. Ad on September 29 - by the Office of the General Prosecutor. [20]

The meaning and impact

The introduction of "Rotterdam+" methodology for determining the coal market price was a transitional stage before the introduction of a full-fledged electricity market in Ukraine from July 1, 2019. [21]

According to the former head of the NERC and a member of the NERC, Alexander Rogozin, the "Rotterdam+" formula in 2016 was the best possible option for calculation coal price in the transition period before opening of electricity market. [22]

According to economists, the formula provided the formation of steam coal prices with the principle of import parity, which was agreed with international financial institutions, including the IMF. [23]

Antimonopoly Committee's conclusions about the "Rotterdam+" formula

On December 18, 2020, the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine closed its own investigation about the "Rotterdam+" formula. [24]

The Antimonopoly Committee officially established that the "Rotterdam+" formula did not harm electricity consumers in Ukraine [25]

Re-closure of criminal investigation

On January 21, 2021, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau announced the re-closure of the "Rotterdam+" case. Soon this information was confirmed by the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office. [26] This decision was overturned by a higher-level prosecutor and a court. [27]

On April 10, 2021, the head of the Rotterdam plus prosecutors' group, Vitaliy Ponomarenko, closed the case for the third time. [27] The National Anti-Corruption Bureau announced immediately that it would appeal this decision again. [27]

On May 5, 2021, the Attorney General's Office replaced the procedural leader in the "Rotterdam+" case. [28] The new prosecutor on May 20, after studying 100 volumes of the case and 350 GB of video materials, interrogations, decided to close the case. [29]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electricity sector in India</span> Power generation and distribution

India is the third largest producer of electricity in the world. During the fiscal year (FY) 2022–23, the total electricity generation in the country was 1,844 TWh, of which 1,618 TWh was generated by utilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy in Bulgaria</span>

Energy in Bulgaria is among the most important sectors of the national economy and encompasses energy and electricity production, consumption and transportation in Bulgaria. The national energy policy is implemented by the National Assembly and the Government of Bulgaria, conducted by the Ministry of Energy and regulated by the Energy and Water Regulatory Commission. The completely state-owned company Bulgarian Energy Holding owns subsidiaries operating in different energy sectors, including electricity: Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, Maritsa Iztok 2 Thermal Power Plant, NEK EAD and Elektroenergien sistemen operator (ESO); natural gas: Bulgargaz and Bulgartransgaz; coal mining: Maritsa Iztok Mines. In Bulgaria, energy prices for households are state-controlled, while commercial electricity prices are determined by the market.

The energy policy of India is to increase the locally produced energy in India and reduce energy poverty, with more focus on developing alternative sources of energy, particularly nuclear, solar and wind energy. Net energy import dependency was 40.9% in 2021-22.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inter RAO</span> Russian electricity company

Joint Stock Company Inter RAO UES, traded as, is a diversified energy holding company headquartered in Moscow, Russia. Its business includes power and heat generation, electricity supply, international energy trading, engineering, design and development of electric power infrastructure. In addition to its assets in Russia it controls several energy companies outside Russia including thermal and hydro power plants, grid operators and energy traders. It holds a monopoly on the export and import of electricity in Russia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zaporizhzhia thermal power station</span> Thermal power station in Enerhodar, Ukraine

Zaporizhzhia thermal power station is a large thermal power plant (DRES) in the purpose-built city of Enerhodar in Ukraine. It is the most powerful thermal power station in Ukraine, with an installed capacity of 2,850 MWe. Its primary fuel is coal. It can also fire natural gas and fuel oil, and has tank storage for these reserve fuels adjacent to the coal bunkers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy in Armenia</span> Overview of the production, consumption, import and export of energy and electricity in Armenia

Energy in Armenia is mostly from natural gas. Armenia has no proven reserves of oil or natural gas and currently imports most of its gas from Russia. The Iran-Armenia Natural Gas Pipeline has the capacity to equal imports from Russia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in Ukraine</span> Overview of nuclear energy in Ukraine

Ukraine operates four nuclear power plants with 15 reactors located in Volhynia and South Ukraine. The total installed nuclear power capacity is over 13 GWe, ranking 7th in the world in 2020. Energoatom, a Ukrainian state enterprise, operates all four active nuclear power stations in Ukraine. In 2019, nuclear power supplied over 20% of Ukraine's energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coal in Ukraine</span> Industrial sector

Coal mining has historically been an important industry in Ukraine. Coal mining in Ukraine is often associated with coal-rich Donets basin. However this is not the only coal mining region, other being Lviv-Volhynian basin and Dnieper brown coal mining basin. The Donets basin located in the eastern Ukraine is the most developed and much bigger coal mining region in the country.

Ukraine has been estimated to possess natural gas reserves of over 670 billions cubic meters (in 2022), and in 2018 was ranked 26th among countries with proved reserves of natural gas. Its total gas reserves have been estimated at 1.870 trillion cubic meters. In 2021, Ukraine produced 19.8 billion cubic meters (bcm or Gm3) of natural gas. To satisfy domestic demand of 27.3 bcm that year, Ukraine relied on gas imports (2.6 bcm) and withdrawal from underground storage (4.9 bcm). Winter demand can reach 150 mcm per day. To meet domestic demand, Ukraine plans to increase domestic natural gas output to 27 bcm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministry of Energy (Ukraine)</span> Ukrainian government ministry

The Ministry of Energy is the main body in the system of central government of Ukraine responsible for realization of electric power-generating state policies; nuclear-industrial, and oil-gas complexes often referred simply as the Fuel-Energy Complex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DTEK</span> Ukrainian energy company

DTEK is the largest private investor in the energy industry in Ukraine. The company's enterprises generate electricity at solar, wind and thermal power plants; extract coal and natural gas, trade energy products in the Ukrainian and foreign markets, distribute and supply electricity to consumers, and develop a grid of supercharger stations for e-vehicles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coal in Russia</span> Coal use and production in Russia

Coal supplied over a tenth of energy in Russia in 2022. The prominence of coal power in Russia has been declining since 1990, although Russia has among the largest coal reserves in the world. Russia is the fifth largest consumer of coal in the world and is the sixth largest producer of coal. It is also the world's third largest coal exporter, vying with Australia and Indonesia for markets. It causes pollution in Russia and climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electricity sector in Russia</span> Overview of the electricity sector in Russia

Russia is the fourth largest generator and consumer of electricity in the world. Its 440 power stations have a combined installed generation capacity of 220 GW.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy in Ukraine</span> Energy and electricity production, consumption and import in Ukraine

Energy in Ukraine is mainly from gas and coal, followed by nuclear and oil. The coal industry has been disrupted by conflict. Most gas and oil is imported, but since 2015 energy policy has prioritised diversifying energy supply.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy in Turkey</span> Energy used and produced in Turkey

Energy consumption per person in Turkey is similar to the world average, and over 85 per cent is from fossil fuels. From 1990 to 2017 annual primary energy supply tripled, but then remained constant to 2019. In 2019, Turkey's primary energy supply included around 30 per cent oil, 30 per cent coal, and 25 per cent gas. These fossil fuels contribute to Turkey's air pollution and its above average greenhouse gas emissions. Turkey mines its own lignite but imports three-quarters of its energy, including half the coal and almost all the oil and gas it requires, and its energy policy prioritises reducing imports.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solar power in Ukraine</span>

Solar power in Ukraine is obtained from photovoltaics or solar thermal energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maksym Timchenko</span>

Maxim Timchenko is chief executive officer of DTEK. He has headed the company since its foundation in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burisma</span> Ukrainian energy company

Burisma Holdings Limited was a holding company based in Kyiv, Ukraine, for a group of energy exploration and production companies. It was registered in Limassol, Cyprus, until being dissolved in 2023. Burisma Holdings operated in the Ukrainian natural gas market since 2002. It was one of the largest private natural gas producers in Ukraine, circa 2019. It was owned by Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky through his company Brociti Investments Limited.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coal in Turkey</span>

Coal supplies a quarter of Turkey's primary energy. The heavily subsidised coal industry generates over a third of the country's electricity and emits a third of Turkey's greenhouse gases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Viktoriya Hryb</span> Ukrainian politician

Viktoriya Oleksandrivna Hryb, or Viсtoria Gryb, is a Ukrainian politician, who is serving as a Member of the Verkhovna Rada. She is a Head of the Subcommittee on Energy Security of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Energy and Housing and Communal Services. Victoria Gryb has over 25 years of professional experience including more than 20 years of experience within roles that combine strategic and managerial responsibility. She has more than 16 years of experience with the Regional USAID Mission for Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus in Kyiv.

References

  1. 1 2 "Resolution on approval of the Procedure for formation of the forecasted wholesale market price of electricity".
  2. ↑ "Law of Ukraine on the electricity market".
  3. ↑ "Rotterdam Plus: Where has the investigation gone?". New Eastern Europe - A bimonthly news magazine dedicated to Central and Eastern European affairs. 9 April 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  4. ↑ OCCRP. "Ukraine's Illegal coal mines: dirty, dangerous, deadly". www.occrp.org. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  5. ↑ "Из 93 шахт на Донбассе работают всего 24". www.unian.net (in Russian). Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  6. ↑ "Ukraine cuts coal production by 38.8% in 2015". Interfax-Ukraine. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  7. ↑ "Ukrainian private companies intend to import 4 mln tonnes of coal from Russia by late 2014 – Prodan". Interfax-Ukraine. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  8. ↑ "Державна служба статистики України". www.ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  9. ↑ "Report on the results of comprehensive research of electricity and thermal coal markets".
  10. 1 2 "Дмитро Вовк: раніше всі були фахівцями з політики і футболу, а останнім часом — з RAB-тарифів". Економічна правда (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  11. ↑ "Формула "Роттердам плюс" була обґрунтована для українського ринку вугілля, - EURACOAL". economics.segodnya.ua (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  12. ↑ "Война против ДТЭК, звонок Коломойского и дорогой зеленый тариф. Интервью с Андреем Герусом". LIGA (in Russian). 13 October 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  13. ↑ "What's Wrong With the 'Rotterdam Formula'?". Ukrayinska Pravda. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  14. ↑ "Головна сторінка · Асоціація споживачів енергетики та комунальних послуг". Асоціація споживачів енергетики та комунальних послуг (in Russian). Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  15. ↑ "SAPO closed the Rotterdam case +". dtek.com. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  16. ↑ "Rotterdam". nabu.gov.ua. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  17. ↑ "НАБУ провело обыски в НКРЭКУ". Интерфакс-Украина (in Russian). Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  18. ↑ "Международные и украинские государственные экспертизы подтвердили обоснованность "Роттердам+" — адвокат". glavcom.ua (in Russian). Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  19. ↑ "SAPO's decision to close Rotterdam + case confirms legality of this principle – DTEK". Interfax-Ukraine. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  20. ↑ ""Даже не вдавалась в суть". Венедиктова оставила закрытым дело "Роттердам+" – Слово и дело". LIGA (in Russian). 15 October 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  21. ↑ "Введение формулы "Роттердам+" сравняло цену украинского угля с импортным". economics.segodnya.ua (in Russian). Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  22. ↑ ""Роттердам+" був кращим варіантом для визначення прогнозної ОРЦ, - Рогозін". РБК-Украина (in Russian). Retrieved 22 October 2020.
  23. ↑ "Offering Circular" (PDF).
  24. ↑ "AMCU closes Rotterdam + case without establishing violations". Interfax-Ukraine. Retrieved 22 December 2020.
  25. ↑ Kitsoft. "Антимонопольний комітет України - АМКУ завершив справу за ознаками порушення НКРЕКП законодавства про захист економічної конкуренції". amcu.gov.ua (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 22 December 2020.
  26. ↑ "Prosecutor closes high-profile Rotterdam+ investigation, again - Jan. 21, 2021". www.kyivpost.com. 21 January 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
  27. 1 2 3 (in Ukrainian) The same prosecutor closed the case of "Rotterdam +" - NABU for the third time, Ukrayinska Pravda (10 April 2021)
  28. ↑ "Венедиктова сменила прокурора, который трижды закрывал "Роттердам +"". Украинская правда (in Russian). Retrieved 21 May 2021.
  29. ↑ "Новый прокурор САП четвертый раз закрыл дело "Роттердам +"". Экономическая правда (in Russian). Retrieved 21 May 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.