Ruth Chang

Last updated
Ruth Chang
Ruth Chang.jpg
Born
Education Dartmouth College (BA)
Harvard University (JD)
Balliol College, Oxford (DPhil)
Era Contemporary philosophy
Region Western philosophy
School Analytic philosophy
Institutions Rutgers University
University of Oxford
Thesis Incomparability and practical reason  (1997)
Main interests
Normative ethics, metaethics, action theory, moral psychology

Ruth Chang is an American philosopher and legal scholar who serves as the Professor and Chair of Jurisprudence at the University of Oxford, [1] a Professorial Fellow of University College, Oxford, and an American professor of philosophy. She was previously a professor at Rutgers University from 1998 to 2019. She is known for her research on the incommensurability of values and on practical reason and normativity. [2] [3] She is also widely known for her work on decision-making and is lecturer or consultant on choice at institutions ranging from video-gaming to pharmaceuticals, the U.S. Navy, World Bank, and CIA. [4] [5] [6] [7]

Contents

Education and career

Chang has a B.A. degree from Dartmouth College, a J.D. from Harvard Law School, and a D.Phil. from Balliol College, Oxford. At the beginning of her graduate work at Oxford in 1991, she was appointed a junior research fellow at Balliol College, during which she also held visiting appointments at the UCLA philosophy department and the University of Chicago Law School. Prior to joining Oxford as the professor of jurisprudence in 2019, she was a professor of philosophy at Rutgers University in the United States.

Chang was a Nicolas Berggruen Fellow at the Stanford University Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. [8] and has received a number of fellowship awards including at the National Humanities Center, [9] the Harvard University Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at the Kennedy School of Government, [10] the Princeton University Center for Human Values, [11] and the American Council of Learned Societies. [12] She was a Scot's Centenary Fellow in Scotland, which involved a lecture tour around Scotland. [13] Her work has been recognized by a National Endowment for the Humanities Public Scholar Award and an American Philosophical Association Op-ed Prize. [14] She was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in April 2021. [15]

Chang at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics Ruth Chang at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics (2).jpg
Chang at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics

Philosophical work

Chang's principal research interests lie in normative ethics, metaethics, action theory and moral psychology. Her work focuses on practical conflict, the nature of reasons and values and their relations, and rational agency. She is known for arguing that the structure of value is not what is commonly assumed: like space and time, which is not structured as we think it is, the normative and evaluative realm is not structured as we think it is. In particular, she is known for arguing that two items which are neither better nor worse than one another and yet not equally good may nevertheless be comparable: they may be 'on a par'. [16] [2] If correct, her view has wide-ranging implications for axiology, normative theory, decision theory, economic choice theory, and rationality. Her work also develops a view of rational agency, 'hybrid voluntarism', according to which rational agents are not merely discoverers of reasons but creators of them through the activity of commitment. [17] She has also written on value pluralism and social choice. She has given various public lectures on decision-making, love, and commitment.

Chang is the author of Making Comparisons Count, and the editor of the first volume on the topic of incommensurability of values in the Anglo-American world, Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, [18] and has authored articles and book chapters.

Ruth Chang is also widely known for her work on 'hard choices' and decision-making, and her research has been the subject of radio, newspaper, and magazine articles. [19]

Selected works

Related Research Articles

Axiology is the philosophical study of value. It includes questions about the nature and classification of values and about what kinds of things have value. It is intimately connected with various other philosophical fields that crucially depend on the notion of value, like ethics, aesthetics or philosophy of religion. It is also closely related to value theory and meta-ethics. The term was first used by Eduard von Hartmann in 1887 and by Paul Lapie in 1902.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethics</span> Philosophical study of morality

Ethics or moral philosophy is the philosophical study of moral phenomena. It investigates normative questions about what people ought to do or which behavior is morally right. It is usually divided into three major fields: normative ethics, applied ethics, and metaethics.

Rationality is the quality of being guided by or based on reason. In this regard, a person acts rationally if they have a good reason for what they do or a belief is rational if it is based on strong evidence. This quality can apply to an ability, as in a rational animal, to a psychological process, like reasoning, to mental states, such as beliefs and intentions, or to persons who possess these other forms of rationality. A thing that lacks rationality is either arational, if it is outside the domain of rational evaluation, or irrational, if it belongs to this domain but does not fulfill its standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christine Korsgaard</span> American philosopher

Christine Marion Korsgaard, is an American philosopher who is the Arthur Kingsley Porter Professor of Philosophy Emerita at Harvard University. Her main scholarly interests are in moral philosophy and its history; the relation of issues in moral philosophy to issues in metaphysics, the philosophy of mind, and the theory of personal identity; the theory of personal relationships; and in normativity in general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ruth Barcan Marcus</span> American philosopher

Ruth Barcan Marcus was an American academic philosopher and logician best known for her work in modal and philosophical logic. She developed the first formal systems of quantified modal logic and in so doing introduced the schema or principle known as the Barcan formula. Marcus, who originally published as Ruth C. Barcan, was, as Don Garrett notes "one of the twentieth century's most important and influential philosopher-logicians". Timothy Williamson, in a 2008 celebration of Marcus' long career, states that many of her "main ideas are not just original, and clever, and beautiful, and fascinating, and influential, and way ahead of their time, but actually – I believe – true".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alasdair MacIntyre</span> Scottish philosopher (born 1929)

Alasdair Chalmers MacIntyre is a Scottish-American philosopher who has contributed to moral and political philosophy as well as history of philosophy and theology. MacIntyre's After Virtue (1981) is one of the most important works of Anglophone moral and political philosophy in the 20th century. He is senior research fellow at the Centre for Contemporary Aristotelian Studies in Ethics and Politics (CASEP) at London Metropolitan University, emeritus Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, and permanent senior distinguished research fellow at the Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture. During his lengthy academic career, he also taught at Brandeis University, Duke University, Vanderbilt University, and Boston University.

Commensurability is a concept in the philosophy of science whereby scientific theories are said to be "commensurable" if scientists can discuss the theories using a shared nomenclature that allows direct comparison of them to determine which one is more valid or useful. On the other hand, theories are incommensurable if they are embedded in starkly contrasting conceptual frameworks whose languages do not overlap sufficiently to permit scientists to directly compare the theories or to cite empirical evidence favoring one theory over the other. Discussed by Ludwik Fleck in the 1930s, and popularized by Thomas Kuhn in the 1960s, the problem of incommensurability results in scientists talking past each other, as it were, while comparison of theories is muddled by confusions about terms, contexts and consequences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philippa Foot</span> English philosopher (1920–2010)

Philippa Ruth Foot was an English philosopher and one of the founders of contemporary virtue ethics. Her work was inspired by Aristotelian ethics. Along with Judith Jarvis Thomson, she is credited with inventing the trolley problem. She was elected a member of the American Philosophical Society. She was a granddaughter of the U.S. President Grover Cleveland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Finnis</span> Australian legal scholar and philosopher

John Mitchell Finnis is an Australian legal philosopher and jurist specializing in jurisprudence and the philosophy of law. He is an original interpreter of Aristotle and Aquinas, and counts Germain Grisez as a major influence and collaborator. He has made contributions to epistemology, metaphysics, and moral philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Raz</span> Israeli philosopher (1939–2022)

Joseph Raz was an Israeli legal, moral and political philosopher. He was an advocate of legal positivism and is known for his conception of perfectionist liberalism. Raz spent most of his career as a professor of philosophy of law at Balliol College, Oxford, and was latterly a part-time professor of law at Columbia University Law School and a part-time professor at King's College London. He received the Tang Prize in Rule of Law in 2018.

Rational egoism is the principle that an action is rational if and only if it maximizes one's self-interest. As such, it is considered a normative form of egoism, though historically has been associated with both positive and normative forms. In its strong form, rational egoism holds that to not pursue one's own interest is unequivocally irrational. Its weaker form, however, holds that while it is rational to pursue self-interest, failing to pursue self-interest is not always irrational.

In ethics, two values are incommensurable when they do not share a common standard of measurement or cannot be compared to each other in a certain way.

Robert N. Audi is an American philosopher whose major work has focused on epistemology, ethics, rationality and the theory of action. He is O'Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, and previously held a chair in the business school there. His 2005 book, The Good in the Right, updates and strengthens Rossian intuitionism and develops the epistemology of ethics. He has also written important works of political philosophy, particularly on the relationship between church and state. He is a past president of the American Philosophical Association and the Society of Christian Philosophers.

In the most general terms, a reason is a consideration which justifies or explains an action, a belief, an attitude, or a fact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geoffrey Sayre-McCord</span> American philosopher

Geoffrey Sayre-McCord is an American philosopher who works in moral theory, ethics, meta-ethics, the history of ethics and epistemology. He teaches at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. He is also the director of the Philosophy, Politics and Economics Society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frances Kamm</span> 20th- and 21st-century American philosopher

Frances Myrna Kamm is an American philosopher specializing in normative and applied ethics. Kamm is currently the Henry Rutgers University Professor of Philosophy and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey. She is also the Littauer Professor of Philosophy and Public Policy Emerita at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, as well as Professor Emerita in the Department of Philosophy at New York University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">R. Jay Wallace</span> American philosophy professor

R. Jay Wallace is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and William and Trudy Ausfahl Chair at the University of California, Berkeley. His areas of specialization include moral philosophy and philosophy of action. He is most noted for his work on practical reason, moral psychology, and meta-ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosophy</span> Study of general and fundamental questions

Philosophy is a systematic study of general and fundamental questions concerning topics like existence, reason, knowledge, value, mind, and language. It is a rational and critical inquiry that reflects on its own methods and assumptions.

Patricia Greenspan is a professor of philosophy at the University of Maryland, College Park. Greenspan works in analytic philosophy of action, and is known for work on rationality, morality, and emotion that helped to create a place for emotion in philosophy of action and ethics.

Humeanism refers to the philosophy of David Hume and to the tradition of thought inspired by him. Hume was an influential Scottish philosopher well known for his empirical approach, which he applied to various fields in philosophy. In the philosophy of science, he is notable for developing the regularity theory of causation, which in its strongest form states that causation is nothing but constant conjunction of certain types of events without any underlying forces responsible for this regularity of conjunction. This is closely connected to his metaphysical thesis that there are no necessary connections between distinct entities. The Humean theory of action defines actions as bodily behavior caused by mental states and processes without the need to refer to an agent responsible for this. The slogan of Hume's theory of practical reason is that "reason is...the slave of the passions". It restricts the sphere of practical reason to instrumental rationality concerning which means to employ to achieve a given end. But it denies reason a direct role regarding which ends to follow. Central to Hume's position in metaethics is the is-ought distinction. It states that is-statements, which concern facts about the natural world, do not imply ought-statements, which are moral or evaluative claims about what should be done or what has value. In philosophy of mind, Hume is well known for his development of the bundle theory of the self. It states that the self is to be understood as a bundle of mental states and not as a substance acting as the bearer of these states, as is the traditional conception. Many of these positions were initially motivated by Hume's empirical outlook. It emphasizes the need to ground one's theories in experience and faults opposing theories for failing to do so. But many philosophers within the Humean tradition have gone beyond these methodological restrictions and have drawn various metaphysical conclusions from Hume's ideas.

References

  1. "Ruth Chang appointed Professor of Jurisprudence". UK: Faculty of Law, University of Oxford. 12 October 2017. Archived from the original on 6 February 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  2. 1 2 Hsieh, Nien-hê. "Incommensurable Values". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  3. Schroeder, Mark. "Value Theory". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  4. "Programs - Decisions, decisions..." RTI Radio Taiwan International. Archived from the original on 4 February 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  5. "Programs - How to Make Hard Choices". RTI Radio Taiwan International. Archived from the original on 4 February 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  6. "A philosopher's guide to decision-making: First, trust yourself". Chicagotribune.com. 7 October 2014. Archived from the original on 4 February 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  7. "Radio Coffeehouse - Home". 10 November 2014. Archived from the original on 10 November 2014. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  8. "CASBS Announces Class of 2016-17 - Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences". Casbs.stanford.edu. 20 May 2016. Archived from the original on 11 March 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  9. "National Humanities Center 2009-10 Fellows and Their Projects". National Humanities Center. Archived from the original on 2009-09-21. Retrieved 2013-01-17.
  10. "Faculty Fellows". Harvard University. Archived from the original on 3 April 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  11. "Previous Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Fellows - University Center for Human Values". Uchv.princeton.edu. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  12. ACLS archives for Charles Ryskamp Fellowships, 2002-3
  13. "Centenary Fellowship – Scots Philosophical Association". Scotsphil.org.uk. Archived from the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  14. "Public Philosophy Op-Ed Contest - The American Philosophical Association". Apaonline.org. Archived from the original on 19 June 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  15. "AAAS New Members Elected in 2021". American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  16. Protevi, John. "New APPS Interview: Ruth Chang". NewAppsblog.com. Archived from the original on 11 March 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  17. Muehlhauser, Luke. "CPBD 021: Ruth Chang – What is Morality?". Common Sense Atheism. Archived from the original on 16 February 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  18. Arpaly, Nomy (October 2000). "Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason". Mind . New Series. 109 (436): 864–866.
  19. See fn. 5.