Seal culling in South Australia

Last updated
Arctophoca forsteri NZ Fur Seal - 1231 2013 002 (14184250871).jpg
Arctophoca forsteri

Seal culling in South Australia was strongly advocated for in 2015 in response to increasing interactions of Arctophocaforsteri, the indigenous long-nosed fur seal (also known as the New Zealand fur seal), with the state's fishing industry. In the 19th century, both fur seals and Australian sea lions were hunted for their hides. During the 20th century, seals were sometimes culled on the assumption that they were competing with fishermen. As of 2018 seal culling is illegal, but remains a topic of public debate. All pinnipeds in South Australia remain fully protected under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 as listed Marine Mammals. As of 2016, there were an estimated 100,000 long-nosed fur seals in South Australian waters.

Contents

History

Despite confusion stemming from its common name, the New Zealand fur seal (Arctophoca forsteri) is a pinniped native to South Australia. Efforts to overcome this confusion have led to increasing use of the common name, long-nosed fur seal. [1]

1800–1899

The species was heavily hunted by sealers in the early 1800s. Seals were clubbed to death by men who raided seal colonies and rookeries by boat, sometimes swimming ashore armed with clubs and knives. The sealers typically bludgeoned the animals to death and used knives to skin the carcasses. Pups were often killed along with their mothers or sometimes kept as pets. The hides of the slain seals were then pickled in brine and exported. [2] Seal hunting continued to occur in Gulf St. Vincent in the 1880s. [3]

The colony of South Australia was only officially established in 1836, and as such, no baseline data exists for the South Australian seal population prior to the impact of hunting. Their population's gradual recovery, spanning the past century, has brought them into increasing conflict with the state's fishing industry.

1900–1949

The killing of seals in South Australian waters continued into the 20th century, on the assumption that they were in competition with fishermen. [4] 7,000 to 8,000 were estimated to have been killed in the six months prior to August 1918. One man alone, S. H. Sheridan of Glenelg admitted to having killed 1,430 seals during this period on the islands of Spencer Gulf. [5] Captain S. A. White, an "ardent nature lover", said of calls that seals should be killed for allegedly competing with fishermen:

"It is not the seals, poor creatures, but that ever destructive being, man, who has created the dearth [of fish]. It is high time the Governments of this country let a glimmer of natural science into their deliberations, and not go for advice to those who are fighting against nature and bringing dire consequences upon their heads." [5]

White estimated that prior to the European colonisation of South Australia, hundreds of thousands of seals likely inhabited its waters.

In 1929, The Advertiser reported that men had been landing on islands in Spencer Gulf and "molesting seals." At this time the animals were protected under the Animals and Bird Protection Act. It was prohibited "for any person to land on Dangerous Reef with a gun or a dog, or to take seals on any of the islands or reefs within St. Vincent or Spencer Gulf north of a line from Cape Catastrophe to Cape Borda, continued to Cape Hart at the south-eastern corner of Kangaroo Island, thence to the mouth of the River Murray." [6]

Seals were known to enter inland river systems and were seen as far up the Murray-Darling system as Deniliquin, 1,000 miles from the mouth of the Murray. A hotel at Conargo once displayed the skin of a seal shot in the river nearby. [7] Other accounts of inland seal sightings prior to 1933 include at Tyntynder, Pental Island, Echuca and near Swan Hill. [8] Other sighting locations include Loxton and Mildura. Seen in this inland context, seals were often referred to as bunyips or otherwise misidentified. [9] [10]

In 1940 some fishermen claimed to have suffered damage to their nets which they attributed to seals. The Chief Inspector of Fisheries and Game at the time suspected that some of the damage had not been done by seals, but rather by sharks. At this time, fishermen in the neighboring state of Victoria were allowed to shoot seals which interfered with their fishing efforts or equipment. [11]

1950–1999

In 1954, W. W. Jenkins suggested in Parliament that an open season should be called to keep seal numbers in check. [12] Fisherman A. W. Lundstrom wrote that before the barrages were built across the River Murray, seals were often seen near the town of Goolwa. [13] Construction of the barrages began in 1935 and they were completed in 1940. [14] Lundstrom, acting as President of the Southern Fishermen's Association wrote of the seals:

"We as fishermen still maintain that the seal is a menace to the fishing industry in the same way as the rabbits, dingoes or kangaroos are to the landholder." [13]

At the time, three fishermen in the Victor Harbor area had permission to shoot seals which interfered with their fishing nets. One of them, A. J. Jenkins, called for an "open season" on seals, stating:

"We want the seals' sanctuary on the islands abolished and a continuous open season declared so these pests may be destroyed at their breeding grounds." [15]

The article in which Jenkins is quoted also claimed that seals consumed up to 40 pounds (18 kg) of fish each day. In a written reply, A. Keith Minchin, Director of Adelaide's Koala Farm, called the claim "a colossal exaggeration" and wrote that even a large seal would consume less than 12 pounds (5.4 kg) of fish daily. [16]

In 1967 it was alleged that fishermen were harpooning seals and dolphins in South Australian waters and using the meat as crayfish bait. The claim was refuted by Thompson, a government fisheries inspector. Thompson stated that permits to cull seals could be made available, and had been previously when net damage caused by seals had been demonstrated. At the time such permits were to be issued "only when deemed absolutely necessary." [17]

In 1984, Australian sea lions were reportedly responsible for damaging the nets of fishermen near Victor Harbor. Fishermen's applications for permits to kill the animals were rejected due to the species' low population. [18] As of 2015, the Australian sea lion remains an endangered species. [19]

2000–present

The southern bluefin tuna ranching industry was established in the early 1990s and reported increasing interactions with fur seals in the 2010s. This led the industry to seek permission to kill seals that they claim they can recognise. [20] Marcus Stehr, son of Hagen Stehr and executive of the Stehr Group told The Advertiser in 2012 that fur seal interactions were costing their southern bluefin tuna ranching aquaculture business "at least $1 million" annually. He stated:

"Seals cost the entire industry millions of dollars every year and we do need support from the State Government to look at how we manage them. In SA we have failed to develop any strategies to manage growing seal numbers and it's vital that this begins." [21]

In 2013 Brian Jeffriess told The Advertiser:

"Attacks by seals are a major problem for tuna ranching. They are the largest cause of tuna deaths in the pontoons and frighten the other tuna so they do not eat for days." [22]

In 2013 The Advertiser reported that New Zealand fur seals ate an average of 4.5 kilograms of marine species each per day. At that time the state population was estimated at over 85,000 animals. [22] In 2015, Dr Brad Page told the ABC that the population had reached 100,000 animals. He also stated that most of the fur seals' diet consists of red bait and arrow squid, and not species which are typically caught and sold for human consumption. [23]

In August 2014, two decapitated New Zealand fur seals were found in Louth Bay, southern Spencer Gulf. The circumstances of their death were regarded as suspicious. [24]

In June 2015, the prospect of seal culling in South Australia became a subject of increasing public debate and controversy. Mounting frustration among fishermen has led some to admit that they will consider taking action themselves in order to protect their livelihoods. A seal was also killed at Murray Bridge after being hit by a boat during a ski-racing event. Approximately five seals were seen in the area, and the event was cancelled after the animal was hit. Its injuries were assessed by a local vet who then euthanized the seal. [25]

In July 2015, fishermen from the Lower Lakes and Coorong region reported that fur seals had damaged their fishing nets. [26]

In August 2015, Narrinjeri elder and fisherman Darrell Sumner admitted to having killed at least four seals and injuring another. He threatened to kill more animals in the future, and believes that the seals are killing pelicans—his people's totem animal. The Narrinjeri believe that pelicans embody the spirits of their dead ancestors, [27] and has said that he doesn't care that killing or hurting the animals is an illegal act under "white man's law".

Fishermen believe that seals are competing with wild catch fisheries, and have reported net damage that they claim was caused by fur seals. Southern bluefin tuna ranchers have reported stock losses at their seacage aquaculture operations. Regions in which claims have been made that fur seals are impacting fisheries and aquaculture businesses include: Kangaroo Island, the Lower lakes and Coorong, and southern Spencer Gulf.

Status

A spokesperson for the Environment Department of the Government of South Australia told The Advertiser in 2012:

"The Government does not support culling, sterilisation or relocation of NZ fur seals in SA. Attempts interstate and overseas to manage seal populations through culling, sterilisation or relocation have proven resource-hungry and largely ineffectual and any benefit received from relocating a small number of seals would likely be lost due to the influx of new seals." [21]

In April 2016, South Australia's environment minister Ian Hunter reaffirmed the Government's position stating "the best available science" showed a cull "would not work". He told The Advertiser that the Government was instead "focusing our resources on measures to reduce the impact of long nosed fur seal populations, including trialing different nets and underwater cracker deterrents.” [28]

All seals and sealions are protected in South Australian waters as listed marine mammals under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. [29] They are also protected as a marine species under the EPBC Act 1999 . This increases the area in which they are protected to include Commonwealth waters and lands controlled by the Commonwealth government. [30]

Advocates for culling

Jamie Briggs Jamie Briggs.jpg
Jamie Briggs

Culling seals in South Australian waters has been advocated for most strongly by fishermen and aquaculture operators who claim that their businesses have suffered as a result of the population's recovery. [31] Other advocates include Liberal Party politicians, [31] conservative newspaper columnist and Liberal member Nicolle Flint, [32] [33] a penguin tour operator in Kangaroo Island and their supporters.

The owner of the Kangaroo Island Penguin Centre, John Ayliffe has advocated for the culling of fur seals on Kangaroo Island, which he believes have impacted little penguin colonies, and therefore his business. [21] [34]

Politicians advocating for the commencement of a cull have included Liberal Party MPs Adrian Pederick, [31] Michael Pengilly [34] and Jamie Briggs. [28]

Opposition to culling

Robert Brokenshire Robert Brokenshire 3.jpg
Robert Brokenshire

Peter Shaughnessy of the South Australian Museum advised that the culling of seals in South Australia would be a bad idea. [20] Political opposition to the culling of seals in South Australia has been demonstrated by animal rights activists, including Animals Australia and the Seals of Nam. Both organisations have created petitions encouraging people to sign and express their opposition to any future cull. [35] [36] Australian Greens MLC Tammy Franks has spoken out against culling, along with the Humane Society International. [31]

While Family First politician Robert Brokenshire has been critical of the Government's "do nothing" approach, he has also expressed concern over the impact that seal culling could have on the State's reputation and tourism industry. He told the ABC:

"Some people have called for culling, now the reality is that we can't do that. It would just damage our economy, it would ruin our tourism." [26]

Culling in other Australian states

SA Shark Industry spokesman Kyri Toumazos suggested that a permitting scheme for seal culling operates in Tasmania. [22] According to the Tasmanian government, all seals in Tasmanian waters are protected. In response to the question "Do seals threaten fisheries?" the Tasmanian government has stated:

"Some fishermen complain about seals, accusing them of taking all their fish. Occasionally fishermen suggest that seals should be culled and that this will increase fish stocks and there will then be more available for human consumption. However, closer examination of seal-fishery interactions at the ecosystem level suggests that removing or culling seals may in fact be detrimental to fish stocks rather than beneficial. Remove a top predator and the whole system runs the risk of collapse." [37]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Longline fishing</span> Commercial fishing technique

Longline fishing, or longlining, is a commercial fishing angling technique that uses a long main line with baited hooks attached at intervals via short branch lines called snoods or gangions. A snood is attached to the main line using a clip or swivel, with the hook at the other end. Longlines are classified mainly by where they are placed in the water column. This can be at the surface or at the bottom. Lines can also be set by means of an anchor, or left to drift. Hundreds or even thousands of baited hooks can hang from a single line. This can lead to many deaths of different marine species. Longliners – fishing vessels rigged for longlining – commonly target swordfish, tuna, halibut, sablefish and many other species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bycatch</span> Fish or other marine species that is caught unintentionally

Bycatch, in the fishing industry, is a fish or other marine species that is caught unintentionally while fishing for specific species or sizes of wildlife. Bycatch is either the wrong species, the wrong sex, or is undersized or juveniles of the target species. The term "bycatch" is also sometimes used for untargeted catch in other forms of animal harvesting or collecting. Non-marine species that are caught but regarded as generally "undesirable" are referred to as "rough fish" and "coarse fish".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pantropical spotted dolphin</span> Species of mammal

The pantropical spotted dolphin is a species of dolphin found in all the world's temperate and tropical oceans. The species was beginning to come under threat due to the killing of millions of individuals in tuna purse seines. In the 1980s, the rise of "dolphin-friendly" tuna capture methods saved millions of the species in the eastern Pacific Ocean and it is now one of the most abundant dolphin species in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yellowfin tuna</span> Species of fish

The yellowfin tuna is a species of tuna found in pelagic waters of tropical and subtropical oceans worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian sea lion</span> Species of carnivore

The Australian sea lion, also known as the Australian sea-lion or Australian sealion, is a species of sea lion that is the only endemic pinniped in Australia. It is currently monotypic in the genus Neophoca, with the extinct Pleistocene New Zealand sea lion Neophoca palatina the only known congener. With a population estimated at around 14,730 animals, the Wildlife Conservation Act of Western Australia (1950) has listed them as “in need of special protection”. Their Conservation status is listed as endangered. These pinnipeds are specifically known for their abnormal breeding cycles, which are varied between a 5-month breeding cycle and a 17-18 month aseasonal breeding cycle, compared to other pinnipeds which fit into a 12-month reproductive cycle. Females are either silver or fawn with a cream underbelly and males are dark brown with a yellow mane and are bigger than the females.

<i>Arctocephalus forsteri</i> Species of carnivore

Arctocephalus forsteri is a species of fur seal found mainly around southern Australia and New Zealand. The name New Zealand fur seal is used by English speakers in New Zealand; kekeno is used in the Māori language. As of 2014, the common name long-nosed fur seal has been proposed for the population of seals inhabiting Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commercial fishing</span> Catching seafood for commercial profit

Commercial fishing is the activity of catching fish and other seafood for commercial profit, mostly from wild fisheries. It provides a large quantity of food to many countries around the world, but those who practice it as an industry must often pursue fish far into the ocean under adverse conditions. Large-scale commercial fishing is also known as industrial fishing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cetacean bycatch</span> Accidental capture of porpoises, whales and dolphins

Cetacean bycatch is the accidental capture of non-target cetacean species such as dolphins, porpoises, and whales by fisheries. Bycatch can be caused by entanglement in fishing nets and lines, or direct capture by hooks or in trawl nets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drift netting</span> Fishing technique

Drift netting is a fishing technique where nets, called drift nets, hang vertically in the water column without being anchored to the bottom. The nets are kept vertical in the water by floats attached to a rope along the top of the net and weights attached to another rope along the bottom of the net. Drift nets generally rely on the entanglement properties of loosely affixed netting. Folds of loose netting, much like a window drapery, snag on a fish's tail and fins and wrap the fish up in loose netting as it struggles to escape. However, the nets can also function as gill nets if fish are captured when their gills get stuck in the net. The size of the mesh varies depending on the fish being targeted. These nets usually target schools of pelagic fish.

Michael Redding Pengilly is an Australian politician who is the mayor of Kangaroo Island. He formerly represented the South Australian House of Assembly seat of Finniss from the 2006 election to 2018, representing the Liberal Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adrian Pederick</span> Australian politician

Adrian Stephen Pederick is an Australian politician, representing the South Australian House of Assembly seat of Hammond for the South Australian Division of the Liberal Party of Australia. Pederick currently holds title of the Government Whip in the South Australian House of Assembly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southern bluefin tuna</span> Species of fish

The southern bluefin tuna is a tuna of the family Scombridae found in open southern Hemisphere waters of all the world's oceans mainly between 30°S and 50°S, to nearly 60°S. At up to 2.5 metres and weighing up to 260 kilograms (570 lb), it is among the larger bony fishes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of fishing</span>

The environmental impact of fishing includes issues such as the availability of fish, overfishing, fisheries, and fisheries management; as well as the impact of industrial fishing on other elements of the environment, such as bycatch. These issues are part of marine conservation, and are addressed in fisheries science programs. According to a 2019 FAO report, global production of fish, crustaceans, molluscs and other aquatic animals has continued to grow and reached 172.6 million tonnes in 2017, with an increase of 4.1 percent compared with 2016. There is a growing gap between the supply of fish and demand, due in part to world population growth.

A drum line is an unmanned aquatic trap used to lure and capture large sharks using baited hooks. They are typically deployed near popular swimming beaches with the intention of reducing the number of sharks in the vicinity and therefore the probability of shark attack. Drum lines are often used in association with shark nets, which results in shark mortality. However SMART drum lines can be used to move sharks, which greatly reduces shark and bycatch mortality. The use of drum lines has been successful in reducing shark attacks in the areas where they are installed. The topic of shark culling became an international controversy and sparked public demonstrations and vocal opposition, particularly from environmentalists, animal welfare advocates and ocean activists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sea Shepherd Conservation Society operations</span> Direct action marine conservation operations

The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society engages in various demonstrations, campaigns, and tactical operations at sea and elsewhere, including conventional protests and direct actions to protect marine wildlife. Sea Shepherd operations have included interdiction against commercial fishing, shark poaching and finning, seal hunting and whaling. Many of their activities have been called piracy or terrorism by their targets and by the ICRW. Sea Shepherd says that they have taken more than 4,000 volunteers on operations over a period of 30 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cormorant culling</span> Seabird culling by the fishing industry

Cormorant culling is the intentional killing of cormorants by humans for the purposes of wildlife management. It has been practiced for centuries, with supporters of culling generally arising from the angling community. Culling techniques may involve the killing of birds, the destruction of eggs, or both. Historically, culls have occurred to protect the interests of recreational and commercial fishermen who perceive the animals to be competing with them for their intended catch or for the prey of their intended catch. Since the 1960s, the growing aquaculture industry has undertaken cormorant culls to protect its farmed fish and crustacean stocks. Opponents of cormorant culling include conservation groups such as the National Audubon Society, Cormorant Defenders International and Sea Shepherd.

Brian Jeffriess is the primary spokesperson for Australia's Southern bluefin tuna fishing and aquaculture industry. He lives in Port Lincoln, South Australia and is the chief executive for the Australian Southern Bluefin Tuna Industry Association. He is a current member of the Australian Maritime and Fisheries Academy, the Commonwealth Fisheries Association, the Aquaculture Advisory Committee and the Fisheries and Aquaculture Research Advisory Committee. Jeffriess features regularly in the Port Lincoln Times newspaper, where he relates the industry's activities and interests to his local community. He attends the international Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna meetings and works closely with industry and government. On 26 January 2012 Jeffriess was awarded Member of the Order of Australia "for service to the fishing and aquaculture industries as a contributor to the sustainable management and harvesting of Australian fisheries and through national and international professional associations." He has also been awarded State and National Seafood Icon status.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shark culling</span> Sanctioned killings of sharks

Shark culling is the deliberate killing of sharks by government authorities, usually in response to one or more shark attacks. The term "shark control" is often used by governments when referring to culls. Shark culling has been criticized by environmentalists, conservationists and animal welfare advocates—they say killing sharks harms the marine ecosystem and is unethical. Government officials often cite public safety as a reason for culling. The impact of culling is also minor compared to bycatch with 50 million sharks caught each year by the commercial fishing industry.

Clean Seas Seafood Ltd is an Australian seafood production company specialising in the sea-cage aquaculture of Yellowtail kingfish. It was established by The Stehr Group in 2000, and became the first Australian company fish farming in South Australia to be listed on the ASX in 2005. The company was established by "tuna baron" Hagen Stehr, whose son Marcus remains one of the company's directors. Clean Seas has shore and sea-based fish farming facilities at Arno Bay, aquaculture leases in Fitzgerald Bay and near Port Lincoln and a processing facility at Royal Park in Adelaide. Its tuna interests were originally held by the private company Australian Tuna Fisheries Pty Ltd. Clean Seas' ambition to control and commercialise the lifecycle of the Southern bluefin tuna has not been realised.

Fish farming is a major economic contributor to South Australia's seafood sector. The most valuable species is the Southern bluefin tuna, which is caught in the wild then transferred into sea cages in southern Spencer Gulf where they are fed locally caught sardines. The second most valuable species is the Yellowtail kingfish, which is farmed near Port Lincoln and Arno Bay. A tourist venture called Oceanic Victor located in Encounter Bay allows paying customers the opportunity to swim in a sea cage with the Southern bluefin tuna and handfeed the fish. Prominent companies in the fish farming sector in South Australia include Clean Seas and Tony's Tuna International.

References

  1. Shaughnessy, P. D.; Goldsworthy, S. D.; Mackay, A. I. (2015-01-01). "The long-nosed fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) in South Australia in 2013–14: abundance, status and trends". Australian Journal of Zoology. 63 (2): 101–110. doi:10.1071/zo14103. S2CID   83425272.
  2. "SEAL HUNTING. BYGONE AUSTRALIAN INDUSTRY". The West Australian. 6 April 1929. p. 4. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  3. "SOUTH AUSTRALIA. ADELAIDE, Thursday". Geelong Advertiser. 12 February 1883. p. 3. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  4. "A SEAL THIEF". Chronicle. 26 April 1913. p. 14. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  5. 1 2 "OUR SEALS. Are They Doomed?". The Register. 23 August 1918. p. 5. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  6. "SEALS IN SPENCER GULF". The Advertiser. 1929-11-26. p. 23. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  7. "FRESHWATER SEALS". Western Grazier. 1943-01-08. p. 2. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  8. "Nature Notes and Queries Inland Seals". The Argus. 1933-12-15. p. 5. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  9. "NATURE and SCIENCE SCIENCE NOTES. | Seals in Inland Waters". The Australasian. 1934-01-27. p. 42. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  10. "ABOUT THE AUSTRALIAN SEALS". Sunday Times. 1919-09-14. p. 21. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  11. "FISHERMEN CANNOT SHOOT SEALS IN MOST S.A. WATERS". News. 1940-09-11. p. 6. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  12. "M.P. SUGGESTS OPEN SEASON FOR SEALS". Victor Harbour Times. 1954-11-12. Retrieved 2015-08-15 via Trove.
  13. 1 2 "Habits Of Seals To The Editor". The Advertiser. 6 November 1954. p. 4. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  14. "Goolwa Barrages, South Australia near Murray Mouth & Coorong". murrayriver.com.au. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  15. "SEALS HAPPY ON ISLAND OFF VICTOR". News. 4 November 1954. p. 17. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  16. "Habits Of Seals To The Editor". The Advertiser. 13 November 1954. p. 4. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  17. "Seals Not Used for Cray Bait". Victor Harbour Times. 1967-01-20. p. 7. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  18. "Fish feast for seals is costly". Victor Harbour Times. 1984-03-14. p. 9. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  19. Goldsworthy, S.D. (2015). "Neophoca cinerea". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species . 2015: e.T14549A45228341. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T14549A45228341.en . Retrieved 13 November 2021.
  20. 1 2 "South Australian Museum - Kangaroo Island Seal Survey". www.samuseum.sa.gov.au. 2013-01-09. Retrieved 2018-01-27.
  21. 1 2 3 "Kangaroo Island may cull New Zealand fur seals to save penguins" . Retrieved 2015-07-08.
  22. 1 2 3 "Fur seals devastating marine eco-system" . Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  23. "Seals wreak havoc in South Australia". Australian Broadcasting Corporation . 2015-04-24. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  24. "Headless seals found on beach treated as suspicious". ABC News. 25 August 2014. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  25. "Seal killed during ski racing" . Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  26. 1 2 "Aggressive seals attacking rare birds, pelicans and fishing nets, SA fishermen warn". ABC News. 24 April 2015. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  27. "Aboriginal elder threatens cull of booming Coorong seal population if Govt doesn't intervene". ABC News. 5 August 2015. Retrieved 2015-08-05.
  28. 1 2 Williams, Tim (2016-04-03). "Federal MP Jamie Briggs joins call for seal cull after witnessing 'massacre' of fairy penguins". The Advertiser. Retrieved 2016-04-03.
  29. "National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972—1.7.2015" (PDF). Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  30. "Seals and Sea Lions - Marine Species Conservation in Australia". environment.gov.au. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  31. 1 2 3 4 "Proposal to cull 'mongrel' fur seals in South Australia criticised". ABC News. 2015-07-02. Retrieved 2015-07-08.
  32. "Nicolle Flint: Why it's time to kill our killer feral seals". adelaidenow.com.au. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  33. "The Paranoid Case For ABC Bias | newmatilda.com". newmatilda.com. 2013-05-15. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  34. 1 2 Islander, The (2015-07-03). "Fur seals taking over - penguins, pelicans, tuna and fish at risk" . Retrieved 2015-07-08.
  35. "Say NO to South Australia's seal slaughter bill!". animalsaustralia.org. Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  36. "Seal Hunt Petitions - The Seals of Nam" . Retrieved 2015-07-09.
  37. "Living with Seals". dpipwe.tas.gov.au. Retrieved 2015-07-09.