Severance tax legislative history in California

Last updated

A severance tax is an article of legislation that imposes a tax on the extraction of natural resources. In the United States, California is the only state that does not impose a significant severance tax. [1] Instead, California imposes a statewide assessment fee, as set by the California Department of Conservation, and individual counties may choose to impose an ad valorem tax on a per county basis. Over the years, several measures have been introduced as ballot initiatives and legislation in an attempt to pass a statewide severance tax, though none has become law.

Contents

Recent history

Former State Senator Noreen Evan, sponsor of the latest legislative attempt to pass a severance tax in 2014. Former State Senator Noreen Evans.jpg
Former State Senator Noreen Evan, sponsor of the latest legislative attempt to pass a severance tax in 2014.

1990s

In the 1990s, the California State Assembly proposed two similar bills, Assembly Bills 1693 [2] by Assemblymember Burt Margolin and 336 [3] by Assembly member Antonio Villaraigosa. Both measures imposed a 6% oil severance tax and the revenues to be raised from the measure were to be directed into California's General Fund. Both measures were stalled in their respective committees and thus never became law.

2006

In 2006, Proposition 87 was proposed, which was a combined constitutional amendment and ballot initiative state statute that was defeated with 45.4% of Californians voting in support of the measure, and with 54.7% opposed. [4] If passed, the proposition would have created the California Energy Alternatives Program Authority, a $4 billion program with the goal of reducing California's dependence on petroleum. [5] Businessman Stephen Bing and Nobel Prize–winning climatologist Dr. Daniel Kammen sponsored the initiative. It was the most expensive campaign in initiative history throughout the United States with the Yes on 87 sponsors raising a combined $61,886,129 and with the No on 87 sponsors raising $94,430,014. [6]

2007-2008

During the 2007-2008 legislative session, California Assembly member Fabian Núñez proposed Assembly Bill 9, [7] a 6% oil severance tax, which directed revenues towards educational purposes for the first fiscal year after implementation. The bill subsequently died in the unfinished business file of the Assembly and did not become law.

2009-2010

Tom Steyer, a lead advocate for a severance tax in California. SteyerHeadshot.jpeg
Tom Steyer, a lead advocate for a severance tax in California.

The next legislative session, California State Senator Denise Moreno Ducheny proposed Senate Bill 1, [8] a 9.9% oil severance tax, with revenues directed towards the General Fund, excluding a specified sum to be deposited into the oil, gas, and geothermal administrative fund. Much like the preceding bill, Senate Bill 1 died in the unfinished file. Simultaneously, Professor Peter Matthews of Santa Monica Community College began circulating a proposed ballot measure to impose a severance tax. Professor Matthews successfully rallied hundreds of student volunteers to conduct mass signature gathering drives. However, the effort failed to collect the needed signatures in time. [9] Assemblywoman Noreen Evans proposed Assembly Bill 2, [10] a measure that would have imposed a 9.9% oil severance tax, enacted a state sales tax exemption for gas sales, repealed the 18-cent rate excise tax on gas/diesel, increased the sales tax by one-half cent, and enacted a 2.5% personal income tax surcharge. The measure successfully passed both Houses of the Legislature, reaching the Governor's desk, but was ultimately vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.

Assembly member Alberto Torrico introduced Assembly Bill 656, which would have imposed 12.5% severance tax, with revenues directed towards education funding. [11] The measure died in committee. [12]

2013-2014

The most recent attempt to pass a severance tax occurred in 2013, which was authored by now State Senator Noreen Evans, was Senate Bill 241, which would have imposed a 9.5% severance tax for oil and a 3.5% severance tax for natural gas. If it had passed, the revenues would have been directed to funding state parks, higher education and the general fund. [13] Senate Bill 241 is currently on the suspense file in the Senate Appropriations Committee. [14] During the same year, Jack Tibbetts, an undergraduate at UC Berkeley, authored and put forward a proposed ballot initiative titled as the California Modernization and Economic Development Act. [15] [16] Like Senate Bill 241, this initiative would have taxed oil and gas extraction at 9.5% and directed funds to higher education state parks, as well as provide subsidies to businesses to fund localized renewable energy projects. The measure earned the endorsements of many prominent figures including former US Secretary of Labor Robert Reich and Nobel laureate Dr. Daniel Kammen. [17] The proponent of initiative later joined forces with Senator Evans and both switched their focus from gathering signatures to mobilizing students to support Senate Bill 241. [18] Further recent developments for a severance tax in California include the support of asset manager Tom Steyer. Leading up to 2014, Steyer launched an effort to conduct public education and issue awareness, as well as lobby California legislators for the implementation of a severance tax. [19] A poll conducted by Steyer's nonprofit organization, NextGen Climate, found that 64% of 800 likely California voters for the 2016 election support the tax. [20]

Related Research Articles

California State Legislature Legislative branch of the state government of California

The California State Legislature is a bicameral state legislature consisting of a lower house, the California State Assembly, with 80 members; and an upper house, the California State Senate, with 40 members. Both houses of the Legislature convene at the California State Capitol in Sacramento. The California state legislature is one of just ten full-time state legislatures in the United States.

A California domestic partnership is a legal relationship, analogous to marriage, created in 1999 to extend the rights and benefits of marriage to same-sex couples. It was extended to all opposite-sex couples as of January 1, 2020 by SB-30, which California Governor Newsom signed into law on July 30, 2019.

1996 California Proposition 218

Proposition 218 is an adopted initiative constitutional amendment which revolutionized local and regional government finance in California. Called the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," it was sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as a constitutional follow-up to the landmark property tax reduction initiative constitutional amendment, Proposition 13, approved in 1978. Proposition 218 was approved by California voters during the November 5, 1996, statewide general election.

Severance taxes are taxes imposed on the removal of natural resources within a taxing jurisdiction. Severance taxes are most commonly imposed in oil producing states within the United States. Resources that typically incur severance taxes when extracted include oil, natural gas, coal, uranium, and timber. Some jurisdictions use other terms like gross production tax.

Jerry Sonnenberg

Jerry Sonnenberg is a member of the Colorado State Senate, representing Senate District 1, which encompasses Cheyenne, Elbert, Kit Carson, Lincoln, Logan, Morgan, Phillips, Sedgwick, Washington, Yuma counties, and parts of Weld County.

1992 California elections

California's state elections were held November 3, 1992. Necessary primary elections were held on March 3. Up for election were all the seats of the State Assembly, 20 seats of the State Senate, and fifteen ballot measures.

2008 Colorado Amendment 58

Amendment 58 was a proposed initiative on the Colorado ballot of 2008 regarding Colorado's severance tax. It was turned down by 57.9% of the voters.

2009 California Proposition 1A Failed California ballot measure

Proposition 1A was a defeated California ballot proposition that appeared on the May 19, 2009 special election ballot. It was a constitutional amendment that would have increased the annual contributions to the state's rainy day fund. The proposition was legislatively referred to voters by the State Legislature.

2009 California Proposition 1D

Proposition 1D was a defeated California ballot proposition that appeared on the May 19, 2009 special election ballot. The measure was legislatively referred by the State Legislature. If approved, the proposition would have authorized a one-time reallocation of tobacco tax revenue to help balance the state budget.

2009 California Proposition 1E

Proposition 1E was a defeated California ballot proposition that appeared on the May 19, 2009 special election ballot. The measure was legislatively referred by the State Legislature. If passed Proposition 1E would have authorized a one-time reallocation of income tax revenue to help balance the state budget.

November 2012 California elections

The California state elections was held on Election Day, November 6, 2012. On the ballot were eleven propositions, various parties' nominees for the United States presidency, the Class I Senator to the United States Senate, all of California's seats to the House of Representatives, all of the seats of the State Assembly, and all odd-numbered seats of the State Senate.

2012 California Proposition 39

Proposition 39 is a ballot initiative in the state of California that modifies the way out-of-state corporations calculate their income tax burdens. The proposition was approved by voters in the November 6 general election, with 61.1% voting in favor of it.

2014 California elections

In California state elections, 2014 was the first year in which the top statewide offices were elected under the nonpartisan blanket primary, pursuant to Proposition 14, which passed with 53% voter approval in June 2010. Under this system, which first went into effect during the 2012 election year, all candidates will appear on the same ballot, regardless of party. In the primary, voters may vote for any candidate, regardless of their party affiliation. The top two finishers, regardless of party, then advance to face each other in the general election in November.

1996 California Proposition 218 (Local Initiative Power)

Proposition 218 is an adopted initiative constitutional amendment in the state of California that appeared on the November 5, 1996, statewide election ballot. Proposition 218 revolutionized local and regional government finance in California. Called the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” Proposition 218 was sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as a constitutional follow-up to the landmark Proposition 13 property tax revolt initiative constitutional amendment approved by California voters on June 6, 1978. Proposition 218 was drafted by constitutional attorneys Jonathan Coupal and Jack Cohen.

2020 California elections

The California state elections in 2020 were held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Unlike previous election cycles, the primary elections were held on Super Tuesday, March 3, 2020.

Road Repair and Accountability Act

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, also known as the "Gas Tax", is a California legislative bill that was passed on April 6, 2017 with the aim of repairing roads, improving traffic safety, and expanding public transit systems across the state. The approval of the fuel tax was for a projected $52.4 billion, or $5.24 billion per year, to be raised over the next 10 years to fund the state's infrastructure. The bill passed primarily along party lines, with most Democrats supporting the bill while most Republicans were against it. The bill passed with a vote of 27–11 in the Senate and 54–26 in the Assembly. According to California Department of Transportation, for maintenance projects on state highways, while providing funding to enhance trade corridors, transit, and active transportation facilities, in addition to repairing local streets and roads throughout California.

2018 California Proposition 6

California Proposition 6 was a measure that was submitted to California voters as part of the November 2018 election. The ballot measure proposed a repeal of the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which is also known as Senate Bill 1. The measure failed with about 57% of the voters against and 43% in favor.

2018 California Proposition 69

California Proposition 69 was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that appeared on ballots in California in the June primary election in 2018. This measure put the revenue from the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which increased fuel taxes, in a "lockbox" so that it can only be used for transportation-related purposes. It also exempts said gas tax revenue from the previously existing appropriations mandate and expenditures limit. This state constitution amendment ensures that revenues from SB1 Gas Taxes established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 can only be used for transportation-related purposes.

2020 California Proposition 15 2020 California ballot measure

California Proposition 15 was a failed citizen-initiated proposition on the November 3, 2020, ballot. It would have provided $6.5 billion to $11.5 billion in new funding for public schools, community colleges, and local government services by creating a "split roll" system that increased taxes on large commercial properties by assessing them at market value, without changing property taxes for small business owners or residential properties for homeowners or renters. The measure failed by a small margin of about four percentage points.

References

  1. ↑ "Assessment Process". California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  2. ↑ "Bill Analysis AB 1693". Legislative Counsel. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  3. ↑ "AB 336 Bill Text". Legislative Counsel. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  4. ↑ "California Proposition 87, Alternative Energy Oil Tax (2006)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  5. ↑ "Proposition 87 Analysis by the Legislative Analyst". California Secretary of State. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  6. ↑ "California Proposition 87, Alternative Energy Oil Tax (2006)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  7. ↑ "ABX3 9 Bill Text" . Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  8. ↑ "SBX1 Bill Text". Legislative Counsel. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  9. ↑ Garofoli, Joe (May 9, 2011). "Oil tax backers brace for a brawl". SF Gate. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  10. ↑ "ABX4 2 Bill Text". Legislative Counsel. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  11. ↑ Wilson, Alia (May 21, 2010). "Assemblyman Alberto Torrico hypes up California colleges about oil tax to fund education". Santa Cruz Sentinel. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  12. ↑ "Current Bill Status AB 656". Legislative Counsel. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  13. ↑ "Senate Bill 241". Legislative Counsel. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  14. ↑ "Current Bill Status SB 241". Legislative Counsel. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  15. ↑ Berryhill, Alex (April 22, 2013). "Students rally on Earth Day in support of tax initiative". The Daily Californian. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  16. ↑ "California Severance Tax on Oil and Gas (2014)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  17. ↑ "Endorsements". Californians for Responsible Economic Development. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  18. ↑ White, Jeremy (May 20, 2013). "California oil tax push would direct new funds to schools". The Sacramento Bee. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  19. ↑ Richman, Josh (December 17, 2013). "Billionaire Tom Steyer to push California lawmakers for oil-extraction tax". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  20. ↑ Lifsher, Marc (May 7, 2014). "Poll shows strong support for oil extraction tax, Tom Steyer says". LA Times. Retrieved 1 December 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.