Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013

Last updated

Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013
Emblem of India.svg
Parliament of India
  • An Act to provide protection against sexual harassment of women at workplace and for the prevention and redressal of complaints of sexual harassment and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
CitationAct No 14 of 2013
Territorial extentWhole of India
Enacted by Parliament of India
Enacted3 Sep 2012 & 11 Mar 2012 (Lok Sabha)
26 Feb 2013 (Rajya Sabha)
Assented to23 April 2013
Commenced9 December 2013
Legislative history
Bill titleSexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Bill, 2013
Bill citationBill No 144-C of 2010
Introduced7 December 2010
Committee report Standing Committee Report
Status: In force

The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 is a legislative act in India that seeks to protect women from sexual harassment at their place of work. It was passed by the Lok Sabha (the lower house of the Indian Parliament) on 3 September 2012. It was passed by the Rajya Sabha (the upper house of the Indian Parliament) on 26 February 2013. [1] The Bill got the assent of the President on 23 April 2013. [2] The Act came into force from 9 December 2013. [3] This statute superseded the Vishaka Guidelines for Prevention Of Sexual Harassment (POSH) introduced by the Supreme Court (SC) of India. It was reported by the International Labour Organization that very few Indian employers were compliant to this statute. [4] [ failed verification ] [5] Most Indian employers have not implemented the law despite the legal requirement that any workplace with more than 10 employees need to implement it. [6] According to a FICCI-EY November 2015 report, 36% of Indian companies and 25% among MNCs are not compliant with the Sexual Harassment Act, 2013. [7] The government has threatened to take stern action against employers who fail to comply with this law. [8]

Contents

A report by the Indian Express in May 2023 finds that half of India's sports federations are yet to create an "Internal Complaints Committee" as mandated by this law. [9]

Preamble and background

The introductory text of the Act is:

An Act to provide protection against sexual harassment of women at workplace and for the prevention and redressal of complaints of sexual harassment and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

WHEREAS sexual harassment results in violation of the fundamental rights of a woman to equality under articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India and her right to life and to live with dignity under article 21 of the Constitution and right to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business which includes a right to a safe environment free from sexual harassment;

AND WHEREAS the protection against sexual harassment and the right to work with dignity are universally recognised human rights by international conventions and instruments such as Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women, which has been ratified on the 25th June, 1993 by the Government of India;

AND WHEREAS it is expedient to make provisions for giving effect to the said Convention for protection of women against sexual harassment at workplace.
[10]

Background and provisions

According to the Press Information Bureau of the Government of India:

The Act will ensure that women are protected against sexual harassment at all the work places, be it in public or private. This will contribute to realisation of their right to gender equality, life and liberty and equality in working conditions everywhere. The sense of security at the workplace will improve women's participation in work, resulting in their economic empowerment and inclusive growth. [11]

This Act was essentially derived from the Vishaka Guidelines. The Vishaka Guidelines were certain procedures to be followed in cases of workplace sexual abuse. These guidelines were formulated after the landmark case Vishaka and others v. State of Rajasthan. This case was brought to the Supreme Court because of the sheer inability of the High Court of Rajasthan to provide justice to Bhanwari Devi who was part of Women's Development Program of the Rajasthan Government. She was brutally gang raped for stopping a child marriage being conducted in a town. This was a part of her duties as a member of the Development Program to stop any illegal activity conducted against children and women. Moreover, this Act uses the definition of sexual harassment laid down by the Supreme Court in Vishakha and others v State of Rajasthan. [12]

Article 19 (1) g of the Indian Constitution affirms the right of all citizens to be employed in any profession of their choosing or to practice their own trade or business. This case established that actions resulting in a violation of one's rights to ‘Gender Equality’ and ‘Life and Liberty’ are in fact a violation of the victim's fundamental right under Article 19 (1) g. The case ruling established that sexual harassment violates a woman's rights in the workplace and is thus not just a matter of personal injury. [13] This case ruling had issued Vishaka guidelines under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court had made it mandatory that these had to be followed by all origination until a legislative framework on the subject has been drawn-up and enacted. [14] However, the legislative void continued and the Supreme Court in Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K Chopra ((1999) 1 SCC 759) reiterated the law laid down in the Vishakha Judgment. Dr. Medha Kotwal of Aalochana (an NGO) highlighted a number of individual cases of sexual harassment stating that the Vishakha Guidelines were not being effectively implemented. Converting the letter into a writ petition, the Supreme Court took cognizance and undertook monitoring of implementation of the Vishakha Guidelines across the country. The Supreme Court asserted that in case of a non-compliance or non-adherence of the Vishakha Guidelines, it would be open to the aggrieved persons to approach the respective High Courts. [14]

The legislative progress of the Act was a long process where the Bill was first introduced by women and child development minister Krishna Tirath in 2007 and approved by the Union Cabinet in January 2010. It was tabled in the Lok Sabha in December 2010 and referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Human Resources Development. The committee's report was published on 30 November 2011. [15] [16] In May 2012, the Union Cabinet approved an amendment to include domestic workers. [17] The amended Bill was finally passed by the Lok Sabha on 3 September 2012. [18] The Bill was passed by the Rajya Sabha (the upper house of the Indian Parliament) on 26 February 2013. It received the assent of the President of India and was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section-1, dated 23 April 2013 as Act No. 14 of 2013.

Major features

Penal Code

Through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, Section 354 A was added to the Indian Penal Code that stipulates what consists of a sexual harassment offence and what the penalties shall be for a man committing such an offence. Penalties range from one to three years imprisonment and/or a fine. Additionally, with sexual harassment being a crime, employers are obligated to report offences. [23]

Criticism

Brinda Karat, serving in the Rajya Sabha as a Communist Party of India (Marxist) member for West Bengal, initially complained that the Bill does not cover women in the armed forces and excludes women agricultural workers, "a gross injustice to agricultural workers who are the single largest female component of work force in the country." [12] However, the final bill includes the clause "No woman shall be subjected to sexual harassment at any workplace" (clause 3.1), and is considered to have addressed those concerns. [24] In the May 2012 draft Bill, the burden of proof is on the women who complain of harassment. If found guilty of making a false complaint or giving false evidence, she could be prosecuted, which has raised concerns about women being even more afraid of reporting offences. [23] Before seeing the final version of the bill, lawyer and activist Vrinda Grover said, "I hope the Bill does not have provisions for penalizing the complainant for false complaints. This is the most under-reported crime. Such provision will deter a woman to come forward and complain." [12] [25] Zakia Soman, a women's rights campaigner at ActionAid India said that "it helps to have a law and we welcome it, but the crux will lie in its implementation once it is enacted." [26]

Manoj Mitta of The Times of India complained that Bill does not protect men, saying it "is based on the premise that only female employees needed to be safeguarded." [27] Nishith Desai Associates, a law group, wrote a detailed analysis that included concerns about the role of the employer in sexual harassment cases. They called out the fact that there is no stipulated liability for employers in cases of employee-to-employee harassment, something upheld in many other countries. They also viewed the provision that employers are obligated to address grievances in a timely manner at the workplace as problematic because of potentially uncooperative employees. Furthermore, the law requires a third-party non-governmental organisation to be involved, which could make employers less comfortable in reporting grievances, due to confidentiality concerns. [23]

Compliance to this statute has so far been left to the vagaries of the employers and government has not taken any significant step to enforce the law so far. For example, 6 months after the law came into effect, the state of UP remained dreadful as women could not participate in the workforce due to sexual harassment. Everyday women are being harassed but there are no records for many cases. [28]

Some tribunals have commented on the constitutionality of some of the provisions of the statute, especially section 4 and Section 7. [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

In United States labor law, a hostile work environment exists when one's behavior within a workplace creates an environment that is difficult or uncomfortable for another person to work in, due to illegal discrimination. However, a working environment that is unpleasant and frightening for the victim due to sexual advances that have been denied by the victim, is what constitutes hostile work environment sexual harassment. Common complaints in sexual harassment lawsuits include fondling, suggestive remarks, sexually-suggestive photos displayed in the workplace, use of sexual language, or off-color jokes. Small matters, annoyances, and isolated incidents are usually not considered to be statutory violations of the discrimination laws. For a violation to impose liability, the conduct must create a work environment that would be intimidating, hostile, or offensive to a reasonable person. An employer can be held liable for failing to prevent these workplace conditions, unless it can prove that it attempted to prevent the harassment and that the employee failed to take advantage of existing harassment counter-measures or tools provided by the employer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual harassment</span> Unwanted sexual attention or advances

Sexual harassment is a type of harassment involving the use of explicit or implicit sexual overtones, including the unwelcome and inappropriate promises of rewards in exchange for sexual favors. Sexual harassment can be physical and/or a demand or request for sexual favors, making sexually coloured remarks, showing pornography, and any other unwelcome physical, verbal, or non-verbal conduct of a sexual nature, verbal. Sexual harassment includes a range of actions from verbal transgressions to sexual abuse or assault. Harassment can occur in many different social settings such as the workplace, the home, school, or religious institutions. Harassers or victims can be of any gender.

In India, eve teasing is a euphemism, primarily occurring in English, used for public sexual harassment or sexual assault of women by men. The name "Eve" alludes to the Bible's creation story concerning Adam and Eve. Considered a problem related to delinquency in male youth, it is a form of sexual aggression that ranges in severity from sexually suggestive remarks, brushing in public places and catcalls, to groping.

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is legislation proposed in the United States Congress that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment on the basis of sexual orientation or, depending on the version of the bill, gender identity, by employers with at least 15 employees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in India</span> Overview of the status of women in India

The status of women in India has been subject to many changes over the time of recorded India's history. Their position in society deteriorated early in India's ancient period, especially in the Indo-Aryan speaking regions, and their subordination continued to be reified well into India's early modern period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Civil Rights Department</span> State government housing agency in California

The California Civil Rights Department (CRD) is an agency of California state government charged with the protection of residents from employment, housing and public accommodation discrimination, and hate violence. It is the largest state civil rights agency in the United States. It also provides representation to the victims of hate crimes. CRD has a director who is appointed by the governor of California and maintains a total of five offices and five educational clinics throughout the state. Today, it is considered part of the California Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005</span> Indian Act of Parliament

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted to protect women from domestic violence. It was brought into force by the Indian government and Ministry of Women and Child Development on 26 October 2006. The Act provides a definition of "domestic violence" for the first time in Indian law, with this definition being broad and including not only physical violence, but also other forms of violence such as emotional, verbal, sexual and psychological abuse. It is a civil law meant primarily for protection orders, rather than criminal enforcement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Men's rights movement in India</span>

The men's rights movement in India is composed of various independent men's rights organisations in India. Proponents of the movement support the introduction of gender-neutral legislation and repeal of laws that they consider are biased against men.

Equal Rights Advocates (ERA) is an American non-profit gender justice/women's rights organization that was founded in 1974. ERA is a legal and advocacy organization for advancing rights and opportunities for women, girls, and people of gender identities through legal cases and policy advocacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">J. S. Verma</span> 27th Chief Justice of India

Jagdish Sharan Verma was an Indian jurist who served as the 27th Chief Justice of India from 25 March 1997 to 18 January 1998. He was the chairman of the National Human Rights Commission from 1999 to 2003, and chairman of the Justice Verma Committee Report on Amendments to Criminal Law after the 2012 Delhi gang rape case. He remains one of India's most highly regarded Chief Justices and eminent jurists in its history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women's Reservation Bill, 2010</span> Constitutional amendment of India

The Women's Reservation Bill or The Constitution Bill, 9 March 2010, is a bill passed in the Parliament of India which says to amend the Constitution of India to reserve 1/3 of all seats in the lower house of Parliament of India, the Lok Sabha, and in all state legislative assemblies for women. The seats were proposed to be reserved in rotation and would have been determined by draw of lots in such a way that a seat would be reserved only once in three consecutive general elections.

Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011 is an Act of the Parliament of India which provides a mechanism to investigate alleged corruption and misuse of power by public servants and also protect anyone who exposes alleged wrongdoing in government bodies, projects and offices. The wrongdoing might be in the form of fraud, corruption or mismanagement. The Act will also ensure punishment for false or frivolous complaints.

Child sexual abuse laws in India have been enacted as part of the child protection policies of India. The Parliament of India passed the 'Protection of Children Against Sexual Offences Bill (POCSO), 2011' regarding child sexual abuse on 22 May 2012, making it an Act. A guideline was passed by the Ministry of Women and Child Development, India. The rules formulated by the government in accordance with the law had also been notified on the November 2012 and the law had become ready for implementation. There have been many calls for more stringent laws.

<i>Vishakha and others v State of Rajasthan</i> 1997 Indian Supreme Court

Vishaka and Ors. v State of Rajasthan was a 1997 Indian Supreme Court case where various women's groups led by Naina Kapur and her organisation, Sakshi filed Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against the state of Rajasthan and the central Government of India to enforce the fundamental rights of working women under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The petition was filed after Bhanwari Devi, a social worker in Rajasthan, was brutally gang raped for stopping a child marriage.

The law for workplace bullying is given below for each country in detail. Further European countries with concrete antibullying legislation are Belgium, France, and The Netherlands.

Sexual harassment in the workplace in US labor law has been considered a form of discrimination on the basis of sex in the United States since the mid-1970s. There are two forms of sexual harassment recognized by United States law: quid pro quo sexual harassment and behavior that creates a hostile work environment. It has been noted that a number of the early sexual harassment cases were brought by African American women and girls.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smita Bharti</span> Indian social activist, playwright and director

Smita Bharti is an Indian social activist, playwright and director. She has written and directed over 20 plays with communities spanning social, class and age strata. Through research, training, workshops, performances, campaigns and publications, she works extensively and intensively with women and adolescents in difficult and challenging circumstances, in prisons with victims under trial, with survivors in situations of domestic violence, sexual abuse and incest, physically and mentally challenged individuals. She also works with the policy and decision makers who have the potential of making systemic change in the country.

The Repealing and Amending Act, 2016 is an Act of the Parliament of India that repealed 295 Acts, and also made minor amendments to the Sexual Harassment of Women at the Work Place Act, 2013, and the Governors Amendment Act, 2014. The Act was the third such repealing act tabled by the Narendra Modi administration aimed at repealing obsolete laws.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is Canada's national police force established in 1920 after the Cabinet moved to have the Royal North-West Mounted Police absorb the Dominion Police. The RCMP's primary mandate is to maintain "peace and order," and Officers provide police services to all Canadian provinces, excluding Québec and Ontario, as well as to the three Canadian territories, and more than 180 municipalities and Indigenous communities.

In Malaysia, sexual harassment, as defined by the Employment Act 1955Archived 11 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine, is “any unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, whether verbal, non-verbal, visual, gestural or physical, directed at a person which is offensive, humiliating or a threat to their well-being”. The Act does not distinguish between male and female or employer and employee. As such, sexual harassment can be committed by a female against a male, or an employee against an employer.

References

  1. ""The Sexual Harassment Bill undermines the innovative spirit of Vishaka" – Naina Kapur, Lawyer and Equality Consultant". Bar and Bench. 1 March 2013. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 2 March 2013.
  2. "The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 Published in The Gazette of India". Press Information Bureau. Retrieved 26 April 2013.
  3. "Law against sexual harassment at workplace comes into effect". Times of India. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
  4. "India must have zero tolerance for workplace sexual harassment" . Retrieved 11 November 2014.
  5. "Action against sexual harassment at workplace in the Asia and the Pacific" (PDF). p. 121. Retrieved 12 November 2014.
  6. "Indian firms take little notice of law against sexual harassment" . Retrieved 12 November 2014.
  7. "Fostering safe workplaces" (PDF). FICCI-EY. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 29 November 2015.
  8. DNA 18 September 2014 (18 September 2014). "Serious legal action against organisations without a sexual harassment committee, says Maneka Gandhi". DNA. Retrieved 13 November 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  9. Kamath, Amit; Vasavda, Mihir (4 May 2023). "Not just wrestling, half of national sports federations don't have sexual harassment panel mandated by law". Indian Express . Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  10. "The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013" (PDF). PRS Legislative Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 April 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2013.
  11. Press Information Bureau, Government of India (4 November 2010). Protection of Women against Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill, 2010. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  12. 1 2 3 Chakrabarty, Rakhi (4 September 2012) "Sexual harassment at workplace Bill passed". Times of India . Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  13. Lawyer's Collective, Sexual harassment of women at workplace bill 2012 passed by Lok Sabha Archived 21 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine , 6 September 2012.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "HOW TO BE POSH COMPLIANT? - Legal Front". 2 July 2018.
  15. The Telegraph (Calcutta) (18 April 2012). "Watch what you say". Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  16. Thorpe, Edgar (ed.) (2012). The Pearson Current Event Digest 2011-2012, pp. 3-4. Pearson Education India. ISBN   8131761789
  17. Polanki, Pallavi (28 August 2012). "Bill against sexual harassment a boost to domestic workers". First Post. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  18. New York Daily News (3 September 2012). "Lok Sabha passes bill against sexual harassment in the workplace" Archived 27 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  19. Handbook on the Law of Sexual Harassment at Workplace by Shivangi Prasad and Attreyi Mukherjee, available at amazon.in and bigbookshop.com
  20. "Is your " workplace" covered under the new sexual harassment law?" . Retrieved 4 December 2014.
  21. "The Protection of Women Against Sexual Harassment at Work Place Bill, 2010". PRS Legislative Research. Retrieved 19 March 2013.
  22. "The Protection of Women Against Sexual Harassment at Work Place Bill, 2010". PRS Legislative Research. Retrieved 19 March 2013.
  23. 1 2 3 Nishith Desai Associates, Veena Gopalakrishnan, Ajay Singh Solanki and Vikram Shroff, India’s new labour law - prevention of sexual harassment at the workplace, Lexology, 30 April 2013
  24. The Hindu Parliament passes Bill to prevent sexual harassment at workplace 26 February 2013
  25. Shajan Perappadan, Bindu (4 September 2012). "Safety net at hand". The Hindu . Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  26. CNN-IBN (5 September 2012). "India moves to protect women from sexual harassment at work". Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  27. Manoj Mitta, Indian men can be raped, not sexually harassed, Times of India, 16 August 2012.
  28. Dhoot, Vikas (11 April 2014). "Abnormally high levels of sexual harassment for women at work places in UP". The Economic Times. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  29. Trivedi, Anushka. "Sexual Harassment Law in India and Constitutional Challenges Read more: Sexual Harassment Law in India and Constitutional Challenges - iPleaders http://blog.ipleaders.in/sexual-harassment-law-in-india-and-constitutional-challenges/#ixzz3o34ZgXqI". iPleaders blog. iPleaders. Retrieved 9 October 2015.{{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)

Bill text

Press articles

Broadcasts

Videos

Power Point Presentation

Ebook

Courses

FAQ