Sherman Minton Supreme Court nomination

Last updated
Sherman Minton Supreme Court nomination
Nominee Sherman Minton
Nominated by Harry S. Truman (president of the United States)
Succeeding Wiley Rutledge (associate justice)
Date nominatedSeptember 15, 1949
Date confirmedOctober 4, 1949
OutcomeConfirmed by the U.S. Senate
Vote of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Votes in favor9
Votes against2
Not voting1
ResultReported favorably
Senate vote on motion to return the nomination to committee
Votes in favor21
Votes against45
Not voting30
ResultMotion to recommit failed
Senate confirmation vote
Votes in favor48
Votes against16
Not voting32
ResultConfirmed

Sherman Minton was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Harry S. Truman on September 14, 1949 after the death in office of Wiley Rutledge created a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Per the Constitution of the United States, Minton's nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nomination was met with a mixed reception and faced active opposition stemming both from the belief that Minton would be a liberal justice and from his history as a New Deal-supporting member of the United States Senate. There was an unsuccessful effort to compel Minton to testify before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Nevertheless, the nomination was approved by a 48-16 vote of the United States Senate on October 4, 1949.

Contents

Nomination

Minton photographed in 1940 Indiana Senator. Washington, D.C., June 11. Senator Sherman Minton, Democrat of Indiana from a new informal picture made a few days ago in his office at the Capitol LCCN2016877739.jpg
Minton photographed in 1940

At a September 15, 1949, news conference, Truman announced Minton's nomination to the Supreme Court, succeeding the late Justice Wiley Rutledge. [1] Minton had already privately accepted the nomination several days earlier after a telephone conversation with Truman. [2] Truman touted Minton's extensive law education and his years of experience on the circuit courts as the reason for his nomination. [2] The Senate formally received the nomination that same day. [3] Minton was the first United States Supreme Court nominee to hail from the state of Indiana. [4]

Minton had served eight years on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit after being appointed in 1941 by then-president Franklin D. Roosevelt. Before this he had served stints as an administrative assistant in Roosevelt's White House, a member of the United States Senate, and public counselor to the Indiana Public Service Commission. [5] In the United States Senate, Minton's desk in the United States Senate Chamber] was next to that of Truman's from 1935 until 1941, and the two had become close friends during this time. While Minton had previously been rumored as a potential appointee to a Cabinet post or a Supreme Court judgeship, Truman had previously declined to do so citing his desire not to overtax Minton due to Minton's health issues related to a heart condition and anemia. [4]

During the long debate over Minton's appointment, criticism would largely focus on his partisanship, past support of the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 court packing plan during his time in the Senate, and his poor health. [2]

News of Minton's appointment received mixed reviews nationally. [6] A great many city newspapers gave what The Cincinnati Enquirer characterized as a "chilly" response to the nomination, much of which,

Recalled his days as a fire-eating New Dealer and a legislator who sought to "muzzle the press" with a federal measure to provide stiff penalties for publishing "false" matter. [7]

The New York Times said that Truman had allowed personal and political friendship to influence his choice. [2] [8] The New Republic said "the President is again reverting to his deplorable habit of choosing men for high post because they happen to be his friends...." The Washington Post raised questions about Minton's ability to be confirmed by the Senate due to the power many of his foes held in the body. [2] The Indianapolis Star offered a more sympathetic opinion, pointing out Minton's qualifications and the pride Indiana could take in having a native on the Supreme Court. The article noted that he would be the most educated justice on the court, should he be confirmed. [2] Another outlying sympathetic newspaper was The Courier-Journal , whose publisher had previously served with Minton on a federal government fact-finding board. [7]

The Indianapolis News noted that speculation had quickly arisen that Minton might be a "liberal" justice. They contrasted this with Truman's previous nominated judges, which the newspaper described of having, "lined up generally with the middle-of-the-road majority." [4] On this note, newspapers and other critics also negatively likened Minton's philosophy and background to that of Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, Minton's former Senate colleague. [7] [9]

Judiciary Committee review

As was long-standing standard procedure for Supreme Court nominations, the nomination was first referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary (Judiciary Committee) for review. [10] Indiana Senator William E. Jenner led a push by opponents of Minton's nomination, including some of Minton's old foes, to bring him before the Senate Judiciary Committee for hearings. [6] Minton wrote a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee answering several of their questions, but refused to submit himself to a hearing. [11] [12] He mentioned his broken leg and hinted in his letter that it could be detrimental to his health to travel in his condition. [2] He also stated that, as a sitting judge and former member of the Senate, it would be improper for him submit to a hearing. [13] Minton responded to questions over his past support for the 1937 court packing scheme in the letter, declaring that as the Senate leader at the time of his scheme he had a right and duty to support the scheme, but as a federal judge his role had now changed to that of a referee rather than a player. [14] The text of Minton's letter was made publicly available. [15] Minton's nomination had faced intense questioning from Republican Senators on his past support for the failed 1937 court packing scheme. Although hearings had occurred irregularly in the past, it was not customary at that time to have a hearing on a nominee. [16] During an absence of Jenner's, Minton's allies worked to have the hearing request dropped. [2] The Judiciary Committee held a single public hearing without Minton's presence on September 27, 1949 on his nomination. [10] [17] [18]

While the Senate Judiciary Committee had voted 5–4 to call for Minton to be questioned, one week later on October 3, 1949, they voted 9–3 to reverse this action and no longer call for it. [19] The second vote saw the attendance of three Democratic members that had been absent from the earlier vote and also saw a fourth Democratic member switch his vote. After this, Senator Homer S. Ferguson (R– MI) angrily left the committee chamber and voiced his dissatisfaction to reporters that he would be unable to ask Minton questions he had intended to pose to him. [20] The Judiciary Committee then proceeded to vote 9–2 to forward his nomination to the full Senate with a favorable report. [2] [10]

Failed motion to recommit the nomination

On October 4, 1949, the Senate met to consider the nomination. Minton's opponents launched numerous delaying tactics and the Senate session before the vote to confirm Minton, which lasted until midnight. [2] Opposition on the floor was led by Wayne Morse. [21] Homer S. Ferguson was also key in these efforts. [2] One of these tactics saw Senator Morse put forth a motion to have the nomination returned to committee. This motion failed, 45–21. [2] [21]

Vote to recommit the Minton nomination [21]
October 4, 1949PartyTotal votes
Democratic Republican
Yea21921
Nay36945
Result: Motion defeated

Confirmation vote

Minton confirmation was approved 48–16 in a vote held on October 4, 1949. [2] Minton was thereafter sworn into office on October 12. [22] To date, Minton remains the last member of Congress, sitting or former, to be appointed to the United States Supreme Court. [2] [14] He is also the only individual that was born in Indiana to be appointed to the court. [14] Minton served on the court for seven years, before retiring on October 15, 1956. [5]

Vote to confirm the Minton nomination [21]
October 4, 1949PartyTotal votes
Democratic Republican
Yea361248
Nay21416
Result: Confirmed

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sherman Minton</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1949 to 1956

Sherman "Shay" Minton was an American politician and jurist who served as a U.S. senator from Indiana and later became an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States; he was a member of the Democratic Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George W. Bush Supreme Court candidates</span>

Speculation abounded over potential nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States by President George W. Bush since before his presidency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination</span> 1987 American failed judicial nomination

On July 1, 1987, President Ronald Reagan nominated Judge Robert Bork for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, to succeed Lewis F. Powell Jr., who had earlier announced his retirement. At the time of his nomination, Bork was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, a position to which he had been appointed by President Reagan in 1982.

During his two terms in office, President Dwight D. Eisenhower nominated five members for the Supreme Court of the United States: Chief Justice Earl Warren, and Associate Justices John Marshall Harlan, William Brennan, Charles Evans Whittaker, and Potter Stewart. All were confirmed by the Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry S. Truman Supreme Court candidates</span>

During his two terms in office, President Harry S. Truman appointed four members of the Supreme Court of the United States: Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, Associate Justice Harold Burton, Associate Justice Tom C. Clark, and Associate Justice Sherman Minton.

During his twelve years in office, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed eight new members of the Supreme Court of the United States: Associate Justices Hugo Black, Stanley F. Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Frank Murphy, James F. Byrnes, Robert H. Jackson, and Wiley Blount Rutledge. Additionally, he elevated sitting Justice Harlan F. Stone to chief justice. Roosevelt's nine nominations filled eight seats on the Supreme Court because Byrnes resigned while Roosevelt was still in office. Roosevelt nominated Rutledge to the seat vacated by Byrnes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nomination and confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States</span> Political process

The nomination and confirmation of justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps, the framework for which is set forth in the United States Constitution. Specifically, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, provides that the president of the United States nominates a justice and that the United States Senate provides advice and consent before the person is formally appointed to the Court. It also empowers a president to temporarily, under certain circumstances, fill a Supreme Court vacancy by means of a recess appointment. The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a justice, thus the president may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lucy Koh</span> American federal judge

Lucy Haeran Koh is an American lawyer and jurist serving as a U.S. circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. She is the first Korean American woman to serve on a federal appellate court in the United States. Koh previously served as a U.S. district judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California from 2010 to 2021. She also served as a California state court judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court from 2008 to 2010.

U.S. President Barack Obama nominated over 400 individuals for federal judgeships during his presidency. Of these nominations, Congress confirmed 329 judgeships, 173 during the 111th & 112th Congresses and 156 during the 113th and 114th Congresses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beth Robinson</span> American judge (born 1965)

Beth Robinson is an American lawyer and judge from Vermont. She is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and is the first openly lesbian judge to serve on any Circuit Court. Robinson served as an associate justice of the Vermont Supreme Court from 2011 to 2021.

Donald Trump, President of the United States from 2017 to 2021, entered office with a significant number of judicial vacancies, including a Supreme Court vacancy due to the death of Antonin Scalia in February 2016. During the first eight months of his presidency, he nominated approximately 50 judges, a significantly higher number than any other recent president had made by that point in his presidency. By June 24, 2020, 200 of his Article III nominees had been confirmed by the United States Senate. According to multiple media outlets, Trump significantly impacted the composition of the Supreme Court and lower courts during his tenure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tamika Montgomery-Reeves</span> American judge

Tamika Renee Montgomery-Reeves is an American lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. She previously served as a justice of the Delaware Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination</span> United States Supreme Court nomination

On September 26, 2020, President Donald Trump announced the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the position of Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to fill in the vacancy left by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. At the time of her nomination, Barrett was a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago, Illinois. The Senate received word from the president on September 29.

President Joe Biden began his presidency with fewer vacancies to fill than his predecessor. President Biden pledged to nominate people with diverse backgrounds and professional experience. Biden also pledged to nominate the first Black woman to the Supreme Court of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court nomination</span> United States Supreme Court nomination

On February 25, 2022, President Joe Biden announced that he would nominate Ketanji Brown Jackson to the position of associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to fill the vacancy by Stephen Breyer, who announced his retirement on January 27, 2022, at the age of 83. Jackson, a former law clerk of Breyer, was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, having been appointed by Biden in 2021. Jackson is the first Black woman in U.S. history to be nominated to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harlan F. Stone Supreme Court nominations</span>

Harlan F. Stone was nominated and confirmed twice to the Supreme Court of the United States. First in 1925, when President Calvin Coolidge nominated him to serve as an associate justice and again in 1941, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt nominated Justice Stone to be elevated to Chief Justice. Both times, the United States Senate confirmed the nominations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louis Brandeis Supreme Court nomination</span>

Louis Brandeis was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson on January 28, 1916, after the death in office of Joseph Rucker Lamar created a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Per the Constitution of the United States, Brandeis' nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wiley Rutledge Supreme Court nomination</span>

Wiley Rutledge was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt on January 11, 1943, after the resignation of James F. Byrnes created a vacancy on the court. Per the Constitution of the United States, Rutledge's nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court. After being favorably reported on by both a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary and the full Judiciary Committee, the nomination was confirmed by the full Senate through a voice vote on February 8, 1943.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thurgood Marshall Supreme Court nomination</span>

Thurgood Marshall was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson on June 13, 1967 to fill the seat being vacated by Tom C. Clark. Per the Constitution of the United States, the nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court. Marshall was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in a 69–11 vote on August 30, 1967, becoming the first African American member of the Court, and the court's first non-white justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senate Judiciary Committee reviews of nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

Since the creation of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary in 1816, many, but not all, nominations for the Supreme Court of the United States have been first referred to a committee for review prior to facing a confirmation vote before the full United States Senate. Some nominations have been withdrawn, lapsed, or been postponed without being referred to the Judiciary Committee, while some others up until 1941 had proceeded to full Senate confirmation votes without first being reviewed by the Judiciary Committee. However, ever since 1941, all nominations have been referred to the Judiciary Committee.

References

  1. ↑ Ariens, Michael. "Sherman Minton biography". Archived from the original on July 14, 2010. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Gugin, Linda; St. Clair, James E. (1997). Sherman Minton: New Deal Senator, Cold War Justice. Indiana Historical Society. pp. 3, 14–15, 18–19, 24, 27. ISBN   978-0-87195-116-8.
  3. ↑ McMillion, Barry J. (January 28, 2022). "Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2020: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved March 5, 2022.
  4. 1 2 3 "Judge Sherman Minton Named to High Court" . The Indianapolis News. September 15, 1949. Retrieved 9 September 2022– via Newspapers.com.
  5. 1 2 "LII: Supreme Court: Chief Justices". www.law.cornell.edu. Cornell Law School. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  6. 1 2 Radcliff, William Franklin (1996). Sherman Minton: Indiana's Supreme Court Justice. Indianapolis, Indiana: Guild Press of Indiana. pp. 2, 131–132. ISBN   978-1-878208-81-1.
  7. 1 2 3 "Minton's Appointment Gets Chilly Reception" . The Cincinnati Enquirer. September 24, 1949. Retrieved 9 September 2022– via Newspapers.com.
  8. ↑ Eisler, Kim Isaac (1993). A Justice for All: William J. Brennan, Jr., and the decisions that transformed America . New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 76. ISBN   978-0-671-76787-7.
  9. ↑ Riggs, Robert L. (September 18, 1949). "People Who Were Afraid of Black Fear Minton for The Same Reason" . The Coutier-Journal. Retrieved 9 September 2022– via Newspapers.com.
  10. 1 2 3 McMillion, Barry J.; Rutkus, Denis Steven (July 6, 2018). "Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2017: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
  11. ↑ "Sherman Minton Moot Court Competition: Who Was Sherman Minton?". Bloomington, Indiana: Maurer School of Law. 2012. Archived from the original on September 28, 2012. Retrieved October 20, 2012.
  12. ↑ Senate Historical Office. "Senate History, October 1, 1949: Supreme Court Nominee Refuses to Testify". United States Senate. Archived from the original on April 10, 2010. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
  13. ↑ Cushman, Clare (2001). The Supreme Court Justices: Illustrated Biographies, 1789–1993 (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Inc. p. 433. ISBN   978-1-56802-126-3.
  14. 1 2 3 Glass, Andrew (October 1, 2014). "SCOTUS nominee refuses to testify, Oct. 1, 1949". Politico.
  15. ↑ "Text of Minton Letter to Senate Group" . The New York Times . October 4, 1949. Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  16. ↑ Thorpe, James A. (1969). "The Appearance of Supreme Court Nominees Before the Senate Judiciary Committee". Journal of Public Law . 18: 371–402.
  17. ↑ Nomination of Sherman Minton. : Hearing, Eighty-first Congress, first session, on the nomination of Sherman Minton, of Indiana, to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. September 27, 1949 - Biddle Law Library - University of Pennsylvania Law School. United States Congress.
  18. ↑ "G.O.P. Senators Quiz Minton on High Bench Post" . The Brooklyn Daily Eagle. United Press. October 3, 1949. Retrieved 27 August 2022– via Newspapers.com.
  19. ↑ "Supreme Court Opens Session Senate Group Votes to Seat Minton" . The Tampa Tribune. The Associated Press. October 4, 1949. Retrieved 9 September 2022– via Newspapers.com.
  20. ↑ "Senate Judiciary Unit OKs Minton as Justice" . The Tribune (Scranton, Pennsylvania). U.P. October 4, 1949. Retrieved 9 September 2022– via Newspapers.com.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Congress and the Nation, 1945-1964: A Review of Government and Politics in the Postwar Years. Congressional Quarterly. 1965. pp. 104a and 105a.
  22. ↑ "Justices 1789 to Present". Washington, D.C.: Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.