Sick man of Europe

Last updated
Caricature from Punch, dated june 6 , 1896. It shows Sultan Abdul Hamid II in front of a poster that announces the reorganization of the Ottoman Empire. The empire's value is estimated at PS5 million (PS570 million in 2019 ). Russia, France and Britain are listed as the directors of the reorganisation. The caricature satirized the impoverished state of the Ottoman economy at the time. Punch magazine - Turkey Ltd - 1896.jpg
Caricature from Punch , dated june 6 , 1896. It shows Sultan Abdul Hamid II in front of a poster that announces the reorganization of the Ottoman Empire. The empire's value is estimated at £5 million (£570 million in 2019 ). Russia, France and Britain are listed as the directors of the reorganisation. The caricature satirized the impoverished state of the Ottoman economy at the time.

"Sick man of Europe" is a label given to a state located in Europe experiencing economic difficulties, social unrest or impoverishment.

Contents

Emperor Nicholas I of the Russian Empire is considered to be the first to use the term "Sick Man" to describe the Ottoman Empire in the mid-19th century. [2] [3] The characterization existed during the "Eastern question" in diplomatic history, which also referred to the decline of the Ottoman Empire in terms of the balance of power in Europe. [4] After the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century, the term has been applied to other states. In modern usage, the term has faced criticism due to its origins and arguable over-usage. [2]

Throughout the 1960s to the 1980s, the term was also most notably used for the United Kingdom when it lost its superpower status as the Empire crumbled and its home islands experienced significant deindustrialization, coupled with high inflation and industrial unrest – such as the Winter of Discontent – including having to seek loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Since the mid-2010s and into the 2020s, the term being used for Britain began to see a resurgence after Brexit, a cost-of-living crisis and industrial disputes and strikes becoming more commonplace. [5]

Origin

Early usage

Russian Tsar Nicholas I (r. 1825–1855), seeking to expand into parts of the Ottoman Empire during the Eastern Question, had described Turkey as "sick" or "sick man" during his meeting with Austrian Prince Metternich (in office 1809–1848) in Münchengrätz, two months after the Treaty of Hünkâr İskelesi in September 1833. In his own writing, Metternich said he had argued against this characterization. [4] [6] [7] Conventionally, foreign minister Metternich was opposed to the characterization of the Ottoman Empire as "sick man of the Bosphorus" because this could lead to his country, the Austrian Empire, becoming the "sick man of the Danube". [8] Other historians, evaluating the conservative "Holy Alliance" of the time, have seen Metternich's foreign policy as aligned with Nicholas, including the policy towards the Ottoman Empire. [7]

Crimean War

British statesman John Russell in 1853, in the run-up to the Crimean War, reported that Nicholas I of Russia described the Ottoman Empire as "a sick man—a very sick man", a "man who has fallen into a state of decrepitude", and a "sick man ... gravely ill". [9] [10] [11] [12]

There has been some degree of debate about the source of the quotation, which often relies on historical documents held or communicated personally. [11] Historian Harold Temperley (1879–1939) gave the date for the first conversation as 9 January 1853, like Goldfrank. [10] [13] According to Temperley, Seymour in a private conversation had to push the Tsar to be more specific about the Ottoman Empire. Eventually, the Tsar stated,

Turkey seems to be falling to pieces, the fall will be a great misfortune. It is very important that England and Russia should come to a perfectly good understanding ... and that neither should take any decisive step of which the other is not apprized [sic]. [14] [15]

And then, closer to the attributed phrase:

We have a sick man on our hands, a man gravely ill, it will be a great misfortune if one of these days he slips through our hands, especially before the necessary arrangements are made. [15]

Different interpretations existed between the two countries on the "Eastern Question" by the time of the Crimean War. [4] The British Ambassador G. H. Seymour agreed with Tsar Nicholas's diagnosis, but he very deferentially disagreed with the Tsar's recommended treatment of the patient; he responded,

Your Majesty is so gracious that you will allow me to make one further observation. Your Majesty says the man is sick; it is very true; but your Majesty will deign to excuse me if I remark, that it is the part of the generous and strong man to treat with gentleness the sick and feeble man. [16]

Temperley then asserts,

The 'sickliness' of Turkey obsessed Nicholas during his reign. What he really said was omitted in the Blue Book from a mistaken sense of decorum. He said not the 'sick man' but the "bear dies … the bear is dying … you may give him musk but even musk will not long keep him alive." [17]

Christopher de Bellaigue argued that neither Nicholas nor Seymour completed the epithet with the prepositional phrase "of Europe". [11]

The first appearance of the phrase "sick man of Europe" appears in The New York Times (12 May 1860):

The condition of Austria at the present moment is not less threatening in itself, though less alarming for the peace of the world, than was the condition of Turkey when the Tsar Nicholas invited England to draw up with him the last will and testament of the 'sick man of Europe.' It is, indeed, hardly within the range of probability that another twelvemonth should pass over the House of Habsburg without bringing upon the Austrian Empire a catastrophe unmatched in modern history since the downfall of Poland. [18] [19]

The author of this article can be seen to be using the term to point to a second "sick man" of Europe, the Habsburg monarchy. [19]

World War One

Later, this view led the Allies in World War I to underestimate the Ottoman Empire, leading in part to the disastrous Gallipoli Campaign. [20] [21] [22] [23] However, the "sick man" eventually collapsed after defeat in the Middle Eastern theatre of World War I.

Post-World War I usage

After the demise of the Ottoman Empire, writers have described many countries as the "sick men" of Europe or the Old World. [2]

France

During the 1950s, France was characterized as the "sick man of Europe," due to a combination of economic issues and a fading optimism since the country was reestablished after World War II. [24] In 1953, Paul Reynaud described France as such to the National Assembly. [25]

A 2007 report by Morgan Stanley referred to France as the "new sick man of Europe". [26] This label was reaffirmed in January 2014 by European newspapers such as The Guardian and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung . [27] [28] They justified this with France's high unemployment, weak economic growth and poor industrial output. [29]

Germany

In the late 1990s, Germany was often labeled with this term because of its economic problems, especially due to the costs of German reunification after 1990, which were estimated to amount to over €1.5 trillion (statement of Freie Universität Berlin). [30] It continued to be used in the early 2000s, and as Germany slipped into recession in 2003. [31] In contrast, a 2016 article by The Guardian described the German economy under Angela Merkel as a "revival" from the country's previous "sick man" status. [32] However, when Germany was experiencing economic issues again in the 2020s, concerns about the "sick man" characterisation reemerged, with Kiel Institute President Moritz Schularick saying: "If Germany does not want to become the 'sick man of Europe' once again, it must now courageously turn its attention to the growth sectors of tomorrow instead of fearfully spending billions to preserve yesterday's energy-intensive industries." [33]

Italy

In 1972, PSDI politician Luigi Preti wrote a book titled Sick Italy (Italia malata). In it, he says that Italy was at risk of becoming "the sick man of Europe who has proved unable to keep in step as soon as he reached the first milestone on the road to well‐being." [34]

In May 2005, this title was again attributed to Italy, with The Economist describing it as "the real sick man of Europe". This refers to Italy's structural and political difficulties thought to inhibit economic reforms to relaunch economic growth. In 2018, Italy was again referred to as the "sick man of Europe" following post-election deadlock. [35] [36] In 2008, in an opinion piece criticizing the country's approach to economic reform, The Daily Telegraph also used the term to describe Italy, [37] as did a CNBC op-ed in 2020. [38]

Russia

The Russian Empire in 1917 was described as the "Sick Man of Europe" in an edition of The New York Times from that year. In the 1917 article by Charles Richard Crane, the illness metaphor is used more directly, with the empire described as "Suffering From Overdose of Exaggerated Modernism in Socialist Reform Ideas", and "the danger for the patient lay in the fact that too many quacks and ignorant specialists were contending for the right to be admitted to the bedside and administer nostrums." [2] [39]

Post-Soviet Russia has also been referred to as such in the 2007 book Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin's Russia and the End of Revolution by Peter Baker and Susan Glasser, [40] and by Mark Steyn in his 2006 book America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It . [41]

In the aftermath of the Wagner Group rebellion during the Russian invasion of Ukraine (and Vladimir Putin's perceived weakness in confronting it), political scientist Aleksandar Đokić said in 2023 that the "sick man of Europe" moniker "seem[ed] fitting for Putin’s Russia." While acknowledging the term itself to be simplistic, Đokić stated that:

"The poetic justice of the imperialistic, orientalising and commonly overused term coming back to haunt its place of origin aside, Putin’s Russia has decidedly found itself in a military, economic, political, demographic, and even conceptual dead end." [42]

United Kingdom

Throughout the late 1960s and 1970s, the United Kingdom was sometimes characterized as the "sick man of Europe", first by commentators, and later at home by critics of the third Wilson/Callaghan ministry due to industrial strife and poor economic performance compared with other European countries. [43] Some observers consider this era to have started with the devaluation of the pound in 1967, culminating with the so-called Winter of Discontent of 1978–79. At different points throughout the decade, numerous countries such as Italy, Spain, Portugal, France, and Greece were cited by the American business press as being "on the verge of sickness" as well.

In the summer of 2017, the United Kingdom was again referred to as the "sick man of Europe" due to the immediate impact of the EU referendum results. [5] The term was used frequently by the early 2020s with regards to the economic effects of Brexit, ongoing industrial action in the public sector, leadership turmoil within the Conservative party, and the cost of living crisis. [44] [45] [46] As of June 2023, the label is still frequently applied to the United Kingdom as inflation and price increases continue to generate economic uncertainty within the country. [47]

The term was also more literally applied during the COVID-19 pandemic after a new strain of coronavirus, the Alpha variant, led to a number of countries closing their borders to UK air travel. [48]

Other uses

Swedish Diplomat and former Prime Minister Carl Bildt once referred to Serbia under the rule of Slobodan Milošević as a candidate for the new "sick man of Europe" in 1997. This is due to political instability in Yugoslavia and its former territories caused by Yugoslav Wars that rocked the Balkan region from 1991 until 2001. [49]

In 2007, The Economist described Portugal as "a new sick man of Europe". [50]

In July 2009, the pejorative was given by EurActiv to Greece in view of the 2008 Greek riots, rising unemployment, and political corruption. [51]

In spring 2011, Eurozine suggested that the European Union was the "sick man of Europe" by entitling an event focusing on the Eurozone crisis, "The EU: the real sick man of Europe?" [52]

In 2015 and 2016, Finland was called the "sick man of Europe" due to its recession and lacklustre growth, in a time when virtually all other European countries had recovered from the Great Recession. [53] [54]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Europe</span>

The history of Europe is traditionally divided into four time periods: prehistoric Europe, classical antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the modern era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Russia</span> History of the Russian Federation

The history of Russia begins with the histories of the East Slavs. The traditional start date of specifically Russian history is the establishment of the Rus' state in the north in 862, ruled by Varangians. In 882, Prince Oleg of Novgorod seized Kiev, uniting the northern and southern lands of the Eastern Slavs under one authority, moving the governance center to Kiev by the end of the 10th century, and maintaining northern and southern parts with significant autonomy from each other. The state adopted Christianity from the Byzantine Empire in 988, beginning the synthesis of Byzantine and Slavic cultures that defined Russian culture for the next millennium. Kievan Rus' ultimately disintegrated as a state due to the Mongol invasions in 1237–1240. After the 13th century, Moscow emerged as a significant political and cultural force, driving the unification of Russian territories. By the end of the 15th century, many of the petty principalities around Moscow had been united with the Grand Duchy of Moscow, which took full control of its own sovereignty under Ivan the Great.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pan-Slavism</span> Political ideology emphasising unity of Slavic peoples

Pan-Slavism, a movement that took shape in the mid-19th century, is the political ideology concerned with promoting integrity and unity for the Slavic people. Its main impact occurred in the Balkans, where non-Slavic empires had ruled the South Slavs for centuries. These were mainly the Byzantine Empire, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Venice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nicholas I of Russia</span> Emperor of Russia from 1825 to 1855

Nicholas I was Emperor of Russia, King of Congress Poland, and Grand Duke of Finland. He was the third son of Paul I and younger brother of his predecessor, Alexander I. Nicholas's reign began with the failed Decembrist revolt. He is mainly remembered in history as a reactionary whose controversial reign was marked by geographical expansion, centralisation of administrative policies, and repression of dissent. Nicholas had a happy marriage that produced a large family; all of their seven children survived childhood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crimean War</span> 1853–1856 war between the Russian Empire and their allies, and the Ottoman Empire and their allies

The Crimean War was fought from October 1853 to February 1856 between the Russian Empire and an ultimately victorious alliance of the Ottoman Empire, France, the United Kingdom, and Sardinia-Piedmont.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Klemens von Metternich</span> Austrian diplomat, foreign minister and Chancellor (1773–1859)

Klemens Wenzel Nepomuk Lothar, Prince of Metternich-Winneburg zu Beilstein, known as Klemens von Metternich or Prince Metternich, was a conservative Austrian statesman and diplomat who was at the center of the European balance of power known as the Concert of Europe for three decades as the Austrian Empire's foreign minister from 1809 and Chancellor from 1821 until the liberal Revolutions of 1848 forced his resignation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Austrian Empire</span> Empire in Europe from 1804 to 1867

The Austrian Empire, officially known as the Empire of Austria, was a multinational European great power from 1804 to 1867, created by proclamation out of the realms of the Habsburgs. During its existence, it was the third most populous monarchy in Europe after the Russian Empire and the United Kingdom. Along with Prussia, it was one of the two major powers of the German Confederation. Geographically, it was the third-largest empire in Europe after the Russian Empire and the First French Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anglo-Russian Convention</span> 1907 treaty between the UK and Russia

The Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907, or Convention between the United Kingdom and Russia relating to Persia, Afghanistan, and Tibet, was signed on August 31, 1907, in Saint Petersburg. It ended the longstanding rivalry in Central Asia and enabled the two countries to outflank the Germans, who were threatening to connect Berlin to Baghdad with a new railroad that could potentially align the Ottoman Empire with Imperial Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Russia (1894–1917)</span>

Under Tsar Nicholas II, the Russian Empire slowly industrialized while repressing opposition from the center and the far-left. During the 1890s Russia's industrial development led to a large increase in the size of the urban middle class and of the working class, which gave rise to a more dynamic political atmosphere. Because the state and foreigners owned much of Russia's industry, the Russian working class was comparatively stronger and the Russian bourgeoisie comparatively weaker than in the West.

In diplomatic history, the Eastern question was the issue of the political and economic instability in the Ottoman Empire from the late 18th to early 20th centuries and the subsequent strategic competition and political considerations of the European great powers in light of this. Characterized as the "sick man of Europe", the relative weakening of the empire's military strength in the second half of the eighteenth century threatened to undermine the fragile balance of power system largely shaped by the Concert of Europe. The Eastern question encompassed myriad interrelated elements: Ottoman military defeats, Ottoman institutional insolvency, the ongoing Ottoman political and economic modernization programme, the rise of ethno-religious nationalism in its provinces, and Great Power rivalries. In an attempt to triangulate between these various concerns, the historian Leslie Rogne Schumacher has proposed the following definition of the Eastern Question:

The "Eastern Question" refers to the events and the complex set of dynamics related to Europe's experience of and stake in the decline in political, military and economic power and regional significance of the Ottoman Empire from the latter half of the eighteenth century to the formation of modern Turkey in 1923.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orlando Figes</span> British historian and writer

Orlando Guy Figes is a British historian and writer. Until his retirement, he was Professor of History at Birkbeck College, University of London, where he was made Emeritus Professor on his retirement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia–United Kingdom relations</span> Bilateral relations

Russia–United Kingdom relations, also Anglo-Russian relations, are the bilateral relations between Russia and the United Kingdom. Formal ties between the courts started in 1553. Russia and Britain became allies against Napoleon in the early-19th century. They were enemies in the Crimean War of the 1850s, and rivals in the Great Game for control of central Asia in the latter half of the 19th century. They allied again in World Wars I and II, although the Russian Revolution of 1917 strained relations. The two countries again became enemies during the Cold War (1947–1989). Russia's business tycoons developed strong ties with London financial institutions in the 1990s after the dissolution of the USSR in 1991. Due to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, relations became very tense after the United Kingdom imposed sanctions against Russia. Russia placed the United Kingdom on a list of "unfriendly countries", along with Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, the United States, European Union members, NATO members, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Micronesia and Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Expansionism</span> Consists of policies of states that involve territorial or economic expansion

Expansionism refers to states obtaining greater territory through military empire-building or colonialism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Austria–Russia relations</span> Bilateral relations

Bilateral relations exist and existed between Austria and Russia and their predecessor states. Since October 1955, the Republic of Austria maintains the constitutionally-mandated status of neutrality; the country is a founding member of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEEC). Austria joined the EU in 1995. Russia is a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, a partner of ASEAN, a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), the G20, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), as well as the leading member state of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), and the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). Both countries are members of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the World Trade Organization (WTO).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Italy–Russia relations</span> Bilateral relations

Italy–Russia relations are the bilateral foreign relations between the two countries, embodied in the so-called privileged relationship. Both countries are full members of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.

The European balance of power is a tenet in international relations that no single power should be allowed to achieve hegemony over a substantial part of Europe. During much of the Modern Age, the balance was achieved by having a small number of ever-changing alliances contending for power, which culminated in the World Wars of the early 20th century. By 1945, European-led global dominance and rivalry had ended and the doctrine of European balance of power was replaced by a worldwide balance of power involving the United States and the Soviet Union as the modern superpowers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian Empire</span> 1721–1917 empire spanning Europe and Asia

The Russian Empire, also known as Tsarist Russia, Tsarist Empire or Imperial Russia, and sometimes simply as Russia, was a vast realm that spanned most of northern Eurasia from its proclamation in November 1721 until its dissolution in March 1917. At its height in the late 19th century, it covered about 22,800,000 square kilometres (8,800,000 sq mi), roughly one-sixth of the world's landmass, making it the third-largest empire in history, surpassed only by the British and Mongol empires; it also held colonies in North America between 1799 and 1867. The empire's 1897 census, the only one it conducted, found a population of 125.6 million with considerable ethnic, linguistic, religious, and socioeconomic diversity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International relations (1814–1919)</span> Diplomacy and wars of six largest powers in the world

This article covers worldwide diplomacy and, more generally, the international relations of the great powers from 1814 to 1919. This era covers the period from the end of the Napoleonic Wars and the Congress of Vienna (1814–1815), to the end of the First World War and the Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign policy of the Russian Empire</span>

The foreign policy of the Russian Empire covers Russian foreign relations from their origins in the policies of the Tsardom of Russia down to the end of the Russian Empire in 1917. Under the system tsarist autocracy, the Emperors/Empresses made all the main decisions in the Russian Empire, so a uniformity of policy and a forcefulness resulted during the long regimes of powerful leaders such as Peter the Great and Catherine the Great. However, several weak tsars also reigned—such as children with a regent in control—and numerous plots and assassinations occurred. With weak rulers or rapid turnovers on the throne, unpredictability and even chaos could result.

The Protocol of St. Petersburg was an 1826 Anglo-Russian agreement for the settlement of the Greek War of Independence.

References

  1. ↑ United Kingdom Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the MeasuringWorth "consistent series" supplied in Thomas, Ryland; Williamson, Samuel H. (2018). "What Was the U.K. GDP Then?". MeasuringWorth . Retrieved February 2, 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Karaian, Jason; Sonnad, Nikhil (2019). "All the people, places, and things called the 'sick man of Europe' over the past 160 years". Quartz. Retrieved 2021-12-21.
  3. ↑ Archives, The National. "Exhibitions & Learning online – British Battles". The National Archives. Retrieved 2021-12-21.
  4. 1 2 3 Badem, Candan (2010). The Ottoman Crimean War, 1853-1856. citing Eckstädt, 1887. Boston: Brill. pp. 68–69. ISBN   978-90-04-19096-2. OCLC   668221743.
  5. 1 2 Branchflower, David (2017-07-24). "'Britain is fast becoming the sick man of Europe' – experts debate Brexit data". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 July 2017.
  6. ↑ Vitzthum von Eckstädt, Karl Friedrich; Reeve, Henry; Taylor, Edward Fairfax (1887). St. Petersburg and London in the years 1852–64. University of Michigan. London, Longmans, Green & co. pp. 29–30.
  7. 1 2 Šedivý, Miroslav (2011). "From Adrianople to Münchengrätz: Metternich, Russia, and the Eastern Question 1829–33". The International History Review. 33 (2): 205–233. doi:10.1080/07075332.2011.555387. ISSN   0707-5332. JSTOR   23032802. S2CID   154635816.
  8. ↑ Discourses of collective identity in Central and Southeast Europe (1770-1945) : texts and commentaries. Vol. II, National romanticism, the formation of national movements. Balázs Trencsényi, Michal Kopeček. Budapest: Central European University Press. 2007. p. 368. ISBN   978-1-4294-2547-6. OCLC   77601805.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  9. ↑ de Bellaigue, Christopher. "Turkey's Hidden Past". The New York Review of Books, 48:4, 2001-03-08.
  10. 1 2 de Bellaigue, Christopher. "The Sick Man of Europe". The New York Review of Books, 48:11, 2001-07-05.
  11. 1 2 3 Bellaigue, Christopher de. "'The Sick Man of Europe'". The New York Review of Books. ISSN   0028-7504 . Retrieved 2021-12-21.
  12. ↑ "Ottoman Empire." Britannica Student Encyclopedia. 2007. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 19 Apr. 2007.
  13. ↑ Harold Temperley, England and the Near East (London: Longmans, Greens and Co., 1936), p. 272.
  14. ↑ Temperley, Harold (2019-05-29). England and the Near East: The Crimea. Routledge. ISBN   978-0-429-64054-4.
  15. 1 2 Harold Temperley, England and the Near East (London: Longmans, Greens and Co., 1936), p. 272. Temperley's translation of the Emperor's comment [spoken in French] is quite accurate. An alternative translation from the original published document follows: "We have on our hands a sick man—a very sick man: it will be, I tell you frankly, a great misfortune if, one of these days, he should slip away from us, especially before all necessary arrangements were made." Source: Parliamentary Papers. Accounts and Papers: Thirty-Six Volumes: Eastern Papers, V. Session 31 January – 12 August 1854, Vol. LXXI (London: Harrison and Son, 1854), doc. 1, p. 2.
  16. ↑ Parliamentary Papers. Accounts and Papers: Thirty-Six Volumes: Eastern Papers, V. Session 31 January – 12 August 1854, Vol. LXXI (London: Harrison and Son, 1854), doc. 1, p. 2.
  17. ↑ Harold Temperley, England and the Near East (London: Longmans, Greens and Co., 1936), p. 272; cites: F.O. 65/424. From Seymour, No. 87 of February 21, 1853.
  18. ↑ "Austria in Extremis". The New York Times. 1860-05-12. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2021-12-21.
  19. 1 2 Buttar, Prit (2014-06-20). Collision of Empires: The War on the Eastern Front in 1914. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 67. ISBN   978-1-78200-971-9.
  20. ↑ Ph.D, David T. Zabecki (2014-10-28). Germany at War: 400 Years of Military History [4 volumes]: 400 Years of Military History. ABC-CLIO. ISBN   978-1-59884-981-3.
  21. ↑ Tucker, Spencer C. (2014-10-28). World War I: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection [5 volumes]: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection. ABC-CLIO. ISBN   978-1-85109-965-8.
  22. ↑ Hamilton, John (2015-04-30). Gallipoli Victoria Cross Hero: The Price of Valour- The Triumph and Tragedy of Hugo Throssell VC. Frontline Books. ISBN   978-1-84832-903-4.
  23. ↑ Atkin, Malcolm (2015-09-18). Fighting Nazi Occupation: British Resistance 1939-1945. Pen and Sword. ISBN   978-1-4738-3377-7.
  24. ↑ Peterson, Wallace C. (April 1957). "Planning and Economic Progress in France". World Politics. 9 (3): 351–382. doi:10.2307/2008919. ISSN   1086-3338. JSTOR   2008919. S2CID   156469824.
  25. ↑ "THE SICK MAN OF EUROPE". The New York Times. 20 June 1953. p. 16. Retrieved 2023-08-16.
  26. ↑ Berner, Richard (2 March 2007). "Does Market Turmoil Change the Outlook?". Morgan Stanley. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
  27. ↑ Finkenzeller, Karin (21 January 2014). "Der kranke Mann Europas" [The sick man of Europe]. Die Zeit (in German). Archived from the original on 14 May 2023.
  28. ↑ "Frankreich holt sich Rat von Peter Hartz" [France seeks advice from Peter Hartz]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. 28 January 2014. Archived from the original on 10 May 2023.
  29. ↑ Elliott, Larry (2014-01-14). "France: the New Sick Man of Europe". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 April 2014.
  30. ↑ "The real sick man of Europe", The Economist. May 19, 2005.
  31. ↑ "The sick man of the euro". The Economist. 1999-06-03. Retrieved 2017-07-02.
  32. ↑ Oltermann, Philip (2016-11-19). "Angela Merkel and the revival of the sick man of Europe". The Guardian. Retrieved 2017-07-02.
  33. ↑ Böhme, Henrik (1 August 2023). "Germany: The return of the 'sick man' of Europe?". Deutsche Welle .
  34. ↑ Hofmann, Paul (26 November 1972). "Spreading Malaise Vexes Italy". The New York Times. p. 1.
  35. ↑ Mehreen Khan. "Italy's populists are Juncker's big headache" . Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10. Retrieved 6 March 2018.
  36. ↑ "Addio, dolce vita". The Economist. 24 November 2005.
  37. ↑ "Italy: The sick man of Europe". The Daily Telegraph. 2008-04-15. Archived from the original on 2009-12-20. Retrieved 3 May 2023.
  38. ↑ "Op-Ed: Italy, the 'sick man of Europe', tries to administer its own medicine". CNBC, 3 March 2020.
  39. ↑ "CRANE DIAGNOSES RUSSIA'S AILMENT; She Is Suffering From Overdose of Exaggerated Modernism in Socialist Reform Ideas". The New York Times. 1917-09-26. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2021-12-21.
  40. ↑ Peter Baker, Susan Glasser, Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin's Russia and the End of Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 2007), pp. 179–176.
  41. ↑ Steyn, Mark (2008). America alone: the end of the world as we know it. Washington/D.C: Regnery Publ. ISBN   978-0-89526-078-9.
  42. ↑ Đokić, Aleksandar (19 July 2023). "An empire on its deathbed can still cause pain and suffering". Euronews .
  43. ↑ "The real sick man of Europe", The Economist. May 19, 2005.
  44. ↑ "Tories turning UK into 'sick man of Europe', says top party donor". The Independent. October 24, 2022.
  45. ↑ "UK set to be sick man of Europe, says Tory backer". MSN.
  46. ↑ "UK doomed without Brexit rethink, warns City boss". BBC News. October 24, 2022.
  47. ↑ "Why does Britain have the worst inflation in the G7? - BBC Newsnight". BBC News. 5 June 2023. Retrieved 5 June 2023.
  48. ↑ Mey, Gerhard; Makori, Ben (2020-12-21). "'Sick man of Europe': UK cut off over fears about new COVID strain". Reuters. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  49. ↑ "Western Press Review: Milosevic And The New 'Sick Man Of Europe'". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 1997-01-09. Retrieved 2021-11-19.
  50. ↑ "A new sick man of Europe". The Economist
  51. ↑ "Greece to appear 'sick man' at EU summit". 11 December 2008. Archived from the original on 2023-05-03. Retrieved 3 May 2023.
  52. ↑ "The EU: the real sick man of Europe?". Eurozine. Archived from the original on 2022-07-02. Retrieved 3 May 2023.
  53. ↑ Khan, Mehreen (2015-11-13). "Finland emerges as the 'new sick man of Europe' as euro's worst performing economy". Telegraph. Retrieved 2017-07-02.
  54. ↑ Walker, Andrew (2016-02-29). "Finland: The sick man of Europe?". BBC News. Retrieved 2017-07-02.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.