Siege of Landau (1704)

Last updated

Siege of Landau (1704)
Part of War of the Spanish Succession
Plan des approches et de la Ville de Landau pris par l'Armee Imperiale (1704).jpg
Map showing the fortifications and siegeworks of 1704
Date9 September – 25 November 1704
Location 49°11′49″N08°06′56″E / 49.19694°N 8.11556°E / 49.19694; 8.11556
Result Allied victory
Belligerents
Grand Alliance France
Commanders and leaders
Joseph, King of the Romans
Louis of Baden
Yrieix Masgontier de Laubanie
Strength
>70,000 (incl. covering forces) [1] 7,000
Casualties and losses
9,322 2,600–5,000
A courier from Landau arrives at the court of Louis XIV during the siege of 1704. Arolsen Klebeband 18 089.jpg
A courier from Landau arrives at the court of Louis XIV during the siege of 1704.
Another map showing the fortifications and siegeworks of 1704 Plan von Landau nebst der Allirten attaque 1704.jpg
Another map showing the fortifications and siegeworks of 1704

The siege of Landau of 1704 was the third of four such sieges [2] during the War of the Spanish Succession. It lasted 77 days from 9 September to 25 November 1704, [3] when the French garrison surrendered to the forces of the Grand Alliance. [4]

Contents

Following the Allied victory at the Battle of Blenheim on 13 August 1704, the remnant of the French Army of Alsace under Ferdinand de Marsin withdrew towards Strasbourg while the Army of Flanders under the Duc de Villeroy covered its retreat. Villeroy reinforced the garrison of Landau with six infantry battalions and some engineers and artillery officers—about 2,000 men—and provided it with provisions and munitions. The garrison, which had about 5,000 men before reinforcement, was commanded by Lieutenant General Yrieix Masgontier de Laubanie. [5]

The Imperial Army—including Austrian and Prussian contingents and Kreistruppen —under Margrave Louis of Baden numbered some 40,000 at the start of the campaign in June. During the Battle of Blenheim, it had been unsuccessfully besieging Ingolstadt. [6] While the forces of the Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene of Savoy pursued Villeroy south and took up covering positions on the river Lauter, preventing any chance of relief for the fortress, Baden began the investment of Landau by digging trenches on 9 September. The trenches were opened on 13 September. [7] [8] As Marlborough had marched without the siege train, the besiegers were relatively short of artillery. [9] This was augmented, however, by that captured at the fall of Ulm on 10 September, which probably arrived on 20 September. [10] Thereafter, the Allied method was one of "massive bombardment" in the style of Menno van Coehoorn. [11]

On 28 September, Joseph, King of the Romans, arrived and took nominal command of the siege. The rate of bombardment increased in October, while the defenders launched several sorties to disrupt the sappers. On 10 October, Laubanie was blinded during a bombardment, but remained in command. By November, the locks by which the defenders could control the flooding of certain ditches by the river Queich were destroyed and Marlborough had moved from his covering position to attack certain fortresses on the Moselle. On 23 November, following the loss of the covered way, Laubanie held a conference with his officers. The chamade was beaten and the garrison surrendered on 25 November. [12] The garrison marched out the next day. [13] The Imperial Army entered on 28 November. [12]

The defenders inflicted severe casualties on the attackers, who suffered 9,322 casualties of all types. [14] [13] At the capitulation, the garrison had between 2,600 and 5,000 killed, wounded or sick. [13]

Notes

  1. According to Clare 2010, p. 4, "Laubanie and his reinforced garrison of around 7,000 troops would be the only French force between over ten times their number of Allied forces and their objectives". At p. 37, he writes that "9,322 casualties ... represents ... in excess of 10 percent casualties".
  2. For the others, see Siege of Landau.
  3. Clare 2010, p. 1.
  4. Lynn 2013, pp. 293–294.
  5. Clare 2010, pp. 3–4.
  6. Wines 1961, p. 247.
  7. Clare 2010, pp. 19–20.
  8. Dates confirmed in Ostwald 2007 , p. 341.
  9. Clare 2010, p. 14.
  10. Clare 2010, p. 20.
  11. Clare 2010, p. 16.
  12. 1 2 Clare 2010, pp. 20–21.
  13. 1 2 3 Clare 2010, p. 37.
  14. Duffy 1985, pp. 46–47.

Works cited

Further reading


Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Blenheim</span> Major battle of the War of the Spanish Succession, fought in 1704

The Battle of Blenheim fought on 13 August [O.S. 2 August] 1704, was a major battle of the War of the Spanish Succession. The overwhelming Allied victory ensured the safety of Vienna from the Franco-Bavarian army, thus preventing the collapse of the reconstituted Grand Alliance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban</span> French military engineer

Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban, Seigneur de Vauban, later Marquis de Vauban, commonly referred to as Vauban, was a French military engineer and Marshal of France who worked under Louis XIV. He is generally considered the greatest engineer of his time, and one of the most important in European military history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Denain</span> 1712 battle

The Battle of Denain was fought on 24 July 1712 as part of the War of the Spanish Succession. It resulted in a French victory, under Marshal Villars, against Dutch and Austrian forces, under Prince Eugene of Savoy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Malplaquet</span> 1709 battle

The Battle of Malplaquet took place on 11 September 1709 during the War of the Spanish Succession, near Taisnières-sur-Hon in modern France, then part of the Spanish Netherlands. A French army of around 75,000 men, commanded by the Duke of Villars, engaged a Grand Alliance force of 86,000 under the Duke of Marlborough. In one of the bloodiest battles of the 18th century, the Allies won a narrow victory, but suffered heavy casualties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Camille d'Hostun, duc de Tallard</span>

Camille d'Hostun de la Baume, duc de Tallard was a French noble, diplomat and military commander, who became Marshal of France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Schellenberg</span> Battle fought on 2 July 1704 during the War of the Spanish Succession

The Battle of Schellenberg, also known as the Battle of Donauwörth, was fought on 2 July 1704 during the War of the Spanish Succession. The engagement was part of the Duke of Marlborough's campaign to save the Habsburg capital of Vienna from a threatened advance by King Louis XIV's Franco-Bavarian forces ranged in southern Germany. Marlborough had commenced his 250-mile (400 km) march from Bedburg, near Cologne, on 19 May; within five weeks he had linked his forces with those of the Margrave of Baden, before continuing on to the river Danube. Once in southern Germany, the Allies' task was to induce Max Emanuel, the Elector of Bavaria, to abandon his allegiance to Louis XIV and rejoin the Grand Alliance; but to force the issue, the Allies first needed to secure a fortified bridgehead and magazine on the Danube, through which their supplies could cross to the south of the river into the heart of the Elector's lands. For this purpose, Marlborough selected the town of Donauwörth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Menno van Coehoorn</span> Dutch expert in siege warfare (1641–1704)

Menno, Baron van Coehoorn was a Dutch soldier and engineer, regarded as one of the most significant figures in Dutch military history. In an era when siege warfare dominated military campaigns, he and his French counterpart Vauban were the acknowledged experts in designing, taking and defending fortifications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Maastricht (1673)</span> Action during the Franco-Dutch War (1672–1678)

The siege of Maastricht took place from 15 to 30 June 1673 during the Franco-Dutch War of 1672 to 1678, when a French army captured the Dutch fortress of Maastricht. The city occupied a key strategic position on the Meuse river and its capture was the main French objective for 1673; it was returned to the Dutch under the terms of the 1678 Treaty of Nijmegen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Turin</span> 1706 battle during the War of the Spanish Succession

The siege of Turin took place from June to September 1706, during the War of the Spanish Succession, when a French army led by Louis de la Feuillade besieged the Savoyard capital of Turin. The campaign by Prince Eugene of Savoy that led to its relief has been called the most brilliant of the war in Italy. The siege is also famous for the death of Piedmontese hero Pietro Micca.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Bouchain (1711)</span>

The siege of Bouchain, following the Passage of the Lines of Ne Plus Ultra, was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession, and the last major victory of John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough. Marlborough and François Nicolas Fagel broke through the French defensive lines and took Bouchain after a siege of 34 days. Its capture left Cambrai the only French-held fortress between the allied army and Paris.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Lille (1708)</span>

The siege of Lille was the salient operation of the 1708 campaign season during the War of the Spanish Succession. After an obstinate defence of 120 days, the French garrison surrendered the city and citadel of Lille, commanded by Marshal Boufflers, to the forces of the Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Wijnendale</span> Battle in the war of the Spanish succession in 1708

The Battle of Wijnendale was a battle in the War of the Spanish Succession fought on 28 September 1708 near Wijnendale, Flanders, between an allied force protecting a convoy carrying ammunition for the Siege of Lille (1708) and forces of Bourbon France and Spain. It ended in a victory for the allies, leading to the taking of Lille.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Bouchain (1712)</span>

The siege of Bouchain, was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession, and a victory for the French troops of the Duc de Villars. A French army of 20,000 men besieged and captured the Allied-controlled fortifications after an 18-day siege, with the 2,000-strong Dutch-Imperial garrison under Major-General Frederik Sirtema van Grovestins capitulating on 19 October.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Kaiserswerth</span>

The siege of Kaiserswerth, was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession. Prussian and Dutch troops numbering 38,000 men and 215 artillery pieces and mortars under the command of Imperial Field Marshal Walrad, Prince of Nassau-Usingen, besieged and captured the small French fortress on the Lower Rhine, which the French had occupied without resistance the previous year. The Dutch regarded the capture of this fortification as more important than an advance into the French-held Spanish Netherlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Ath (1697)</span> 1697 siege during the Nine Years War

The siege of Ath was a siege of the Nine Years' War. The French stockpiled 266,000 French pounds of gunpowder for the siege and used less than half of it. Consumption of other material amounted to 34,000 pounds of lead, 27,050 cannonballs, 3,400 mortar bombs, 950 grenades and 12,000 sandbags. The financial costs were 89,250 French livres. After the garrison's capitulation, 6,000 peasant workers filled up the trenches. Under the terms of surrender, the Allied garrison marched off to freedom and was not taken prisoner. Of the 62 French engineers present, two were killed and seven seriously wounded. This demonstration of French military potency, combined with the successful storming of Barcelona the same year, convinced the Allies to come to terms with France in the treaty of Ryswick, thus ending the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Zoutleeuw</span> 1705 siege at Zoutleeuw during the War of the Spanish Succession

The siege of Zoutleeuw or the siege of Léau was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession. Allied troops with 16 artillery pieces under the command of the English Captain general the Duke of Marlborough, besieged and captured the small French-held Flemish fortified town of Zoutleeuw in the Spanish Netherlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Haguenau (1705)</span> Conflict in War of the Spanish Succession

The siege of Haguenau was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession. An Imperial army under the command of Field Marshal Johann Karl von Thüngen, besieged and captured the French fortified city of Haguenau on the banks of the Rhine river in Alsace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polygonal fort</span> Type of fortification

A polygonal fort is a type of fortification originating in France in the late 18th century and fully developed in Germany in the first half of the 19th century. Unlike earlier forts, polygonal forts had no bastions, which had proved to be vulnerable. As part of ring fortresses, polygonal forts were generally arranged in a ring around the place they were intended to protect, so that each fort could support its neighbours. The concept of the polygonal fort proved to be adaptable to improvements in the artillery which might be used against them, and they continued to be built and rebuilt well into the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Ghent (1708)</span>

The siege of Ghent was the last operation of the 1708 campaign season during the War of the Spanish Succession. After successfully taking Lille shortly before, the Duke of Marlborough moved his forces onto the town of Ghent where after a 12-day siege the town's governor, Count Charles de La Mothe-Houdancourt, surrendered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of San Sebastián (1719)</span> 1719 siege

The siege of San Sebastián took place in 1719 during the War of the Quadruple Alliance when French forces under the Duke of Berwick successfully laid siege to the Spanish city of Siege of San Sebastián close to the French border. Combined with the British Attack on Vigo, this led the Spanish to seek peace terms and the war ended with the agreement of the Treaty of The Hague in 1720.