State legislation in protest of federal law in the United States

Last updated

Several US States have introduced various resolutions and legislation in protest to federal actions. [1] Despite this, the Supreme Court has explicitly rejected the idea that the states can nullify federal law. In Cooper v. Aaron (1958), the Supreme Court of the United States held that federal law prevails over state law due to the operation of the Supremacy Clause, and that federal law "can neither be nullified openly and directly by state legislators or state executive or judicial officers nor nullified indirectly by them through evasive schemes ..." Thus, state laws purporting to nullify federal statutes or to exempt states and their citizens from federal statutes have only symbolic impact.

Contents

State sovereignty resolutions (10th Amendment resolutions)

These resolutions attempt to reassert state sovereignty over any area not listed among the "enumerated powers" (i.e., any law based on an "expansive reading" of the Commerce Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, or the Supremacy Clause would, according to this resolution, be invalid).

State sovereignty bills (10th Amendment Bills)

A "State Sovereignty Bill" is one step beyond a State Sovereignty Resolution. The bill would mandate action against what the state legislature perceives as unconstitutional federal legislation.

Firearms freedom legislation and federal gun laws nullification

Starting in 2012, in response to a threat of law made through executive orders by President Obama, more than a dozen states around the US began proposing legislation that would "...declare that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states". The legislation would require that the firearm be prominently marked as being "Made in {name of state}" and further prohibit federal regulation solely on the basis that "basic materials" and "generic and insignificant parts" of the firearm may have their origins from outside the state.

Cannabis laws

As of December 2023, 14 states (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Hawaii, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Utah, and West Virginia) have passed legislation which permit the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes only. [10]

24 states (Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington) & Washington, D.C. have passed legislation to permit use of recreational cannabis in addition to medical use. [11]

The Obama administration announced in October 2009 that it advised federal prosecutors not to target legally-operating medicinal cannabis users, or their suppliers, in states that have passed such laws. [12] However, in the same year, the DEA conducted a record number of medical cannabis raids. [13]

The DEA has continued to raid federally prohibited medical facilities in several states. [14] [15] [16]

The IRS has also attempted to prevent the sale of medical cannabis in California by refusing to treat normally-deductible business expenses as such for dispensaries, notably for the Harborside Health Center in Oakland. [17] [18]

REAL ID Act

As of March 2010, 25 states (beginning with Maine in 2007) have passed legislation and/or resolutions which opposed the REAL ID Act. Though the legislation is still on the books, its implementation has been delayed on several occasions and is currently not being enforced. [19]

National health care nullification

As of March 2010, legislators in 30 states had introduced legislation which would declare certain provisions of any proposed national health care bill to be null and void within the state; the legislation passed in Arizona, Idaho, Utah, and Virginia. [20] Such provisions include mandatory participation in such a system as well as preserving the right of a patient to pay a health care professional for treatment (and for the professional to accept it) outside of a single-payer system. Arizona's legislation passed as a proposed constitutional amendment, approved by voters in 2010. [21] On February 1, 2010, the Virginia Senate took a stand against a key provision of a proposed federal health care overhaul, passing legislation declaring that Virginia residents cannot be forced to buy health insurance. On March 17, 2010, Idaho Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter signed a bill requiring the Attorney General to sue the federal government if Idaho residents are required to buy health insurance. [22]

Bring the Guard home

As of March 2010, legislators in seven states had introduced legislation which would permit the governor of the state to recall any National Guard troops from overseas deployments (such as in Iraq and Afghanistan); the bills failed in Maryland and New Mexico. [23]

As of March 2010, legislators in seven states have introduced legislation which would seek to nullify federal legal tender laws in the state by authorizing payment in gold and silver or a paper note backed 100% by gold or silver; the legislation failed in Colorado and Montana. [24]

Cap-and-trade nullification

As of March 2010, legislators in four states have introduced legislation which would nullify any proposed federal emissions regulation under the "cap-and-trade" model; none have advanced beyond the introductory stage. [25]

State sovereignty and federal tax funds acts

As of March 2010, legislators in three states have introduced legislation which would require businesses (and in some cases, individuals) to remit their federal tax payments to the state treasurer (or equivalent body) for deposit into an escrow fund. If the state legislature determined that a portion of the federal budget was not constitutional, or if the federal government imposed penalties or sanctions upon the state for creating the fund, then the money would be withheld. None have advanced beyond the introductory stage. [26]

Sheriffs first legislation

As of March 2010, legislators in three states had introduced legislation which would make it a crime for any federal agent to make an arrest, search or seizure within the state without getting the advance, written permission of the sheriff of the county in which the event would take place. The bills would provide for the following exceptions:

None have advanced beyond the introductory stage. [28]

Federal land legislation

As of February 2010, legislators in Utah have introduced legislation to allow the use of eminent domain on federal land. Rep. Christopher Herrod has introduced the bill in a state where the federal government controls over 60% of the land. The effort has the full support of Republican Attorney General Mark Shurtleff, who would have to defend the law. The proposal includes setting aside $3 million for legal defense. [29] [30]

Nullification of federal intrastate commerce regulation

As of March 2010, legislators in four states had introduced legislation which would nullify federal regulation of trade and activities which are solely within the boundaries of a state and which do not cross state lines; that is activities that are by its definition not commerce, under the Constitution.[ citation needed ] The Virginia legislation has passed one house. [31] [ failed verification ]

Sanctuary city

Another form of protest against enforcement of immigration laws, several United States cities have declared themselves sanctuary cities, whereby they have ordered the local police department to specifically not work with United States Customs and Border Protection officials to arrest persons illegally residing within the boundaries of the city, and not to inquire as to a person's immigration status, even if the person was arrested. [32]

Intrastate Coal and Use Act

In protest of the Environmental Protection Agency allegedly overstepping its authority by interfering with intrastate commerce, the West Virginia Intrastate Coal and Use Act (H.B. 2554) [33] was being introduced into the West Virginia House of Delegates by Delegate Gary Howell. The bill states that coal sold and used within the borders of West Virginia is not subject to EPA authority because no interstate commerce exists and the state retains the rights to control its own intrastate commerce under the 10th Amendment. [34] [35] [36] The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) recommends the Intrastate Coal and Use Act for model legislation in other states. [37]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions</span> 1798/99 resolutions against the Alien and Sedition Acts

The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were political statements drafted in 1798 and 1799 in which the Kentucky and Virginia legislatures took the position that the federal Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional. The resolutions argued that the states had the right and the duty to declare unconstitutional those acts of Congress that the Constitution did not authorize. In doing so, they argued for states' rights and strict construction of the Constitution. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798 were written secretly by Vice President Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1791 amendment enumerating states rights

The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. It expresses the principle of federalism, also known as states' rights, by stating that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution, and that all other powers not forbidden to the states by the Constitution are reserved to each state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1996 California Proposition 215</span> California law permitting medical marijuana

Proposition 215, or the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, is a California law permitting the use of medical cannabis despite marijuana's lack of the normal Food and Drug Administration testing for safety and efficacy. It was enacted, on November 5, 1996, by means of the initiative process, and passed with 5,382,915 (55.6%) votes in favor and 4,301,960 (44.4%) against.

The Commerce Clause describes an enumerated power listed in the United States Constitution. The clause states that the United States Congress shall have power "to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes". Courts and commentators have tended to discuss each of these three areas of commerce as a separate power granted to Congress. It is common to see the individual components of the Commerce Clause referred to under specific terms: the Foreign Commerce Clause, the Interstate Commerce Clause, and the Indian Commerce Clause.

In American political discourse, states' rights are political powers held for the state governments rather than the federal government according to the United States Constitution, reflecting especially the enumerated powers of Congress and the Tenth Amendment. The enumerated powers that are listed in the Constitution include exclusive federal powers, as well as concurrent powers that are shared with the states, and all of those powers are contrasted with the reserved powers—also called states' rights—that only the states possess.

Interposition is a claimed right of a U.S. state to oppose actions of the federal government that the state deems unconstitutional. Under the theory of interposition, a state assumes the right to "interpose" itself between the federal government and the people of the state by taking action to prevent the federal government from enforcing laws that the state considers unconstitutional.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marijuana Policy Project</span> American organization

The Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) is the largest organization working solely on marijuana policy reform in the United States in terms of its budget, number of members, and staff.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal history of cannabis in the United States</span>

In the United States, increased restrictions and labeling of cannabis as a poison began in many states from 1906 onward, and outright prohibitions began in the 1920s. By the mid-1930s cannabis was regulated as a drug in every state, including 35 states that adopted the Uniform State Narcotic Drug Act. The first national regulation was the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937.

Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal laws which they deem unconstitutional with respect to the United States Constitution. There are similar theories that any officer, jury, or individual may do the same. The theory of state nullification has never been legally upheld by federal courts, although jury nullification has.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medical cannabis in the United States</span> Use of cannabis for medical purposes in the United States

In the United States, the use of cannabis for medical purposes is legal in 38 states, four out of five permanently inhabited U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia, as of March 2023. Ten other states have more restrictive laws limiting THC content, for the purpose of allowing access to products that are rich in cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive component of cannabis. There is significant variation in medical cannabis laws from state to state, including how it is produced and distributed, how it can be consumed, and what medical conditions it can be used for.

The Tenther movement is a social movement in the United States, whose adherents espouse the political ideology that the federal government's enumerated powers must be read very narrowly to exclude much of what the federal government already does, citing the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in support of this. The text of the amendment reads:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that, under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Congress may criminalize the production and use of homegrown cannabis even if state law allows its use for medicinal purposes.

Carl Daniel Wimmer is a Utah politician who served as a member of the Utah House of Representatives from 2007-2012 before resigning to run for the United States House of Representatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legality of cannabis by U.S. jurisdiction</span> Cannabis laws by state and territory

In the United States, the use and possession of cannabis is illegal under federal law by way of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Cannabis is classified as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, determined to have a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, prohibiting its use for any purpose. Despite this, most states have passed laws to legalize the use of cannabis for medical purposes, while close to a majority of states have legalized for recreational use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States presidential eligibility legislation</span>

The Constitution of the United States provides several basic requirements for eligibility to be elected to the office of President. Individual states did not introduce significant relevant legislation until the 2008 election of Barack Obama, when a controversy known as the birther movement was promoted by various conspiracy theorists. The "birthers" asserted during the 2008 presidential election campaign that Obama was not a natural-born U.S. citizen, as mandated by the Constitution, and thus was ineligible to be President of the United States, prompting several state legislatures to consider legislation aimed at requiring future presidential candidates to provide proof of citizenship by birth before being granted ballot access in their state. None of these efforts led to the passage of currently active laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of cannabis laws in the United States</span> Historical list in chronological order of U.S. cannabis law

The legal history of cannabis in the United States began with state-level prohibition in the early 20th century, with the first major federal limitations occurring in 1937. Starting with Oregon in 1973, individual states began to liberalize cannabis laws through decriminalization. In 1996, California became the first state to legalize medical cannabis, sparking a trend that spread to a majority of states by 2016. In 2012, Washington and Colorado became the first states to legalize cannabis for recreational use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannabis in Wisconsin</span> Overview of the use and culture of cannabis in Wisconsin, U.S.

Cannabis in Wisconsin is illegal for recreational use. Possession of any amount is punishable by up to 6 months in prison and a $1000 fine for a first offense. A second offense is punished as a felony with up to 3.5 years in prison and up to a $10,000 fine. At the local level, however, numerous municipalities and counties have decriminalized cannabis or lessened penalties for minor possession offenses. Medical use is legal only in the form of low-THC cannabis oil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Florida Amendment 2</span> Ballot measure in Florida legalizing medical marijuana

The Florida Medical Marijuana Legalization Initiative, also known as Amendment 2, was approved by voters in the Tuesday, November 8, 2016, general election in the State of Florida. The bill required a super-majority vote to pass, with at least 60% of voters voting for support of a state constitutional amendment. Florida already had a medical marijuana law in place, but only for those who are terminally ill and with less than a year left to live. The goal of Amendment 2 is to alleviate those suffering from these medical conditions: cancer, epilepsy, glaucoma, positive status for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Crohn's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic nonmalignant pain caused by a qualifying medical condition or that originates from a qualified medical condition or other debilitating medical conditions comparable to those listed. Under Amendment 2, the medical marijuana will be given to the patient if the physician believes that the medical use of marijuana would likely outweigh the potential health risks for a patient. Smoking the medication was not allowed under a statute passed by the Florida State Legislature, however this ban was struck down by Leon County Circuit Court Judge Karen Gievers on May 25, 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William J. Wivell</span> American politician (born 1964)

William Joseph Wivell is an American politician who has served as a member of the Maryland House of Delegates representing District 2A since 2015. A member of the Republican Party, he was previously a member of the Washington County Board of Commissioners from 1998 to 2010, and from 2014 to 2015.

References

  1. Johnston, Kirk. "States’ Rights Is Rallying Cry for Lawmakers" New York Times March 16, 2010
  2. "10th Amendment Resolutions". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  3. Not all states require gubernatorial assent of resolutions; in some states a resolution is deemed passed if both houses concur as to the language.
  4. "10th Amendment Bills". Tenth Amendment Center. November 16, 2009. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  5. "Firearms Freedom Act Legislation". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  6. "Raising the bar for Nullification". Tenth Amendment Center. February 5, 2010. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  7. "Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Texas". Tenth Amendment Center Blog. November 16, 2010. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  8. "House Bill 2705 Text". Legis.state.wv.us. January 21, 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  9. Kansas Governor Signs Second Amendment Protection Act. Tenth Amendment Center (2013-04-17). Retrieved on 2013-07-12.
  10. "Medical Marijuana Laws - NORML". National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws . Retrieved December 13, 2023.
  11. "Legalization - NORML". National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws . Retrieved December 13, 2023.
  12. David W. Ogden (October 19, 2009). "Memorandum for Selected United States Attorneys - Investigations and Prosecutions in States Authorizing the Medical Use of Marijuana" (PDF). United States Department of Justice . Retrieved September 20, 2010.
  13. "Blowing Smoke: Obama Promises One Thing, Does Another on Medical Marijuana". April 6, 2011. Retrieved July 15, 2013.
  14. "Feds Raid Medical Marijuana Dispensaries In Michigan". Toke of the Town. April 12, 2011.
  15. "Montana Medical Marijuana Federal Raid Protests". Montana Norml. March 15, 2011.
  16. "Weho Medical Marijuana Collectives Closed After DEA Raid". West Hollywood Patch. March 16, 2011.
  17. Erb, Kelly Phillips (October 6, 2011). "IRS Just Says No to Medical Marijuana Deductions". Forbes. Retrieved March 12, 2012.
  18. Olson, Al (October 5, 2011). "IRS ruling strikes fear in medical marijuana industry". MSNBC. Archived from the original on October 6, 2011. Retrieved March 12, 2012.
  19. "Real ID Nullification Legislation". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  20. "Health Care Freedom Act". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  21. "Arizona HCR2014: National Health Care Nullification". Tenth Amendment Center. June 26, 2009. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  22. Miller, John, AP (March 18, 2010). Idaho First to Sign Law against Health Care Reform. ABC News.
  23. "Bring the Guard Home Legislation". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  24. "Constitutional Tender Legislation". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  25. "Cap and Trade Nullification Legislation". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  26. "State Sovereignty and Federal Tax Funds Act". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  27. "Sheriffs First". Sheriffs First. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  28. "Sheriffs First Legislation". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  29. Vergaris, Brock, AP (February 11, 2010). Utah Lawmakers Want Federal Land Returned to State. ABC News.
  30. Carltom, Jim (March 30, 2010). Federal Land Seizures Urged by Utah Governor. Wall Street Journal .
  31. "Nullification of Federal Intrastate Commerce Regulation". Tenth Amendment Center. Retrieved November 3, 2010.
  32. Fimrite, Peter (January 7, 2011). "Newsom says S.F. won't help with raids". SFGate.com. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved March 8, 2011.
  33. "House Bill 2554 Text". Legis.state.wv.us. January 19, 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  34. Bandes, Jillian. "Can a State Bypass the EPA?". Townhall Conservative. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  35. Emily Newman (December 29, 2010). "Delegate proposes coal permit act". Cumberland Times-News. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  36. "1/18/11: House discusses coal permitting and school funding". YouTube. May 20, 1982. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  37. "EPA's Regulatory Train Wreck". July 2013. Archived from the original on March 24, 2011.