Stellar influences on an origin of life setting

Last updated

The origin of life is an ongoing field of research that requires the study of interactions of many physical and biological processes. One of these physical processes has to do with the characteristics of the host star of a planet, and how stellar influences on an origin of life setting can dictate how life evolves, if at all. Life required an energy source at its origin, and scientists have long speculated that this energy source could have been the ultraviolet radiation that rains down on Earth. Though it may potentially be harmful to life, UV has also been shown to trigger important prebiotic reactions that might have taken place on a younger Earth. [1]

Contents

Main sequence M dwarf stars are generally the focus of studies that investigate the role of UV in prebiotic chemistry and an origin of life setting, given that the potential habitability of planets in these systems is a big field of research, and the lifecycles and characteristics of these stars are relatively well known. Furthermore, in the context of biosignatures, M dwarfs are considered one of the better places to look to find life for various reasons (see: habitability of M dwarfs). In order to experimentally investigate the effects of UV on the origin of life, studies make use of UV sources such as mercury lamps, and computational simulations of radiative transfer that model how UV interacts with different atmospheric compositions with different levels of shielding. Altogether, these methods allow scientists to test how different aspects of prebiotic chemistry operate under conditions of UV (so called 'light chemistry') versus how they operate in conditions with reduced UV or none at all ('dark chemistry'). [2]

This work is helpful for understanding the conditions under which life might have started on a prebiotic Earth and can also be used to identify exoplanets that may have the right conditions for life. Since the first discovery in 1992, more than 5000 exoplanets have been found, and a subset of these exist within the liquid water habitable zone of their host star. [3] By experimentally estimating how much light is needed for UV photochemistry based on reaction rates for light chemistry versus dark chemistry, scientists have designated another zone around a star, called the 'abiogenesis zone'. [2] This is based on an understanding of how proximity to a host star changes the flux of UV, and how that influences prebiotic chemistry. A planet existing within overlap of the habitable zone with the abiogenesis zone of a given star would theoretically provide the right conditions for life to evolve there.

UV and abiogenesis

UV light is considered a key component of prebiotic chemistry on an early Earth. Because of their short wavelengths (10-400 nanometers), UV photons carry enough energy to effect the electronic structure of molecules by interacting with molecular bonds by breaking them (photolysis), ionizing them (photoionization), or exciting their electrons (photoexcitation). [4] This can sometimes lead to degradation of biologically important molecules, causing subsequent environmental stress and providing a barrier to abiogenesis. [5] In 1973, Carl Sagan first suggested that UV might pose a selection threat against abiogenesis because early biological repair mechanisms would have been more primitive than now, and early prebiotic chemistry would have faced intense selection pressure to shield against UV. [5] [6]

Conversely, these potentially destructive properties are also what makes UV an ideal candidate for a source of energy, similar to the Miller-Urey experiment that synthesized prebiotic molecules using simulated lightning. Across many different studies of prebiotic chemistry, UV light has been incorporated to explain the origin of chirality, [7] the synthesis of amino acids, [8] and the formation of ribonucleotides. [9] Due to a lack of biogenic UV-shielding O2 and O3 present in the prebiotic atmosphere, and the fact that a younger Sun at the time had a higher fractional output of UV (see: the young sun paradox), UV is expected to have been common in the prebiotic environment. [4] One study suggested that in the absence of O3, UV light with at wavelengths < 300 nm contributed 3 orders of magnitude more energy than electrical discharge to the surface of an early Earth. [10]

Experimental methods

Given that UV may have been the most available source of energy for prebiotic chemistry, many experiments aim to deduce and quantify the effects of UV irradiance on synthesis pathways. A fraction of these studies deal with the formation of prebiotic molecules on interstellar ices and cometary surfaces. [11] For this, UV is sourced from lamps or synchrotrons in ultrahigh vacuum conditions, and the UV output is generally below a wavelength of 160 nm. Other studies are interested in prebiotic chemistry that occurred in aqueous solution, and also make use of UV lamps. UV lamps are a good source because they are safe, stable, and affordable. However their output is generally narrowband, and real solar UV output is broadband. [4]

Many UV-dependent prebiotic reactions are wavelength dependent, so research using the narrowband UV lamps may not reach the same conclusions as those conducted under more realistic conditions. [4] There are many studies that include UV as a key component of their prebiotic synthesis pathways. In particular, a ribonucleotide synthesis [9] and a sugar synthesis [12] pathway both rely on irradiation from a mercury UV lamp. For all studies, and the se two in particular, early Solar UV irradiation and variability would have heavily influenced the availability of prebiotically important feedstock gases like CH4 and HCN (hydrogen cyanide). [4] And although the effects are difficult to constrain due to lack of a full understanding of what the prebiotic Earth environment looked like, understanding how prebiotic chemistry might have proceeded in the presence of solar UV is one step towards a better understanding of abiogenesis.

Ribonucleotide synthesis

A key issue facing the RNA world hypothesis, and the eventual pathway to abiogenesis, is how the comparatively complex RNA molecules actually came to be. One proposed pathway to RNA synthesis under plausible prebiotic conditions used irradiation from UV light at 254 nm. [9] The UV here plays two roles: first, it destroys competing molecules that are generated along the synthesis pathway, and secondly, it was required to promote the synthesis via photoactivation. [4]

Simple sugar synthesis

A proposed companion synthesis reaction of two- and three-carbon sugars glycolaldehyde and glyceraldehyde from hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and formaldehyde also requires UV irradiation. [4] Previously, the mechanism used to explain the prebiotic synthesis of sugars was the formose reaction, wherein formaldehyde polymerizes to form longer sugars. This polymerization tends to run away, and leads to an insoluble tar, effectively terminating the reaction. [4] The UV-driven synthesis, however, is much more selective and generates a smaller number of products that are useful for further chemical reactions. This synthesis relies of production of solvated electrons and protons via photoionization of a photocatalytic transition metal complex under UV light at 254 nm. [12]

Stellar influence

Further considerations of environments conducive to prebiotic chemistry extend beyond how the Sun influenced Earth, and are interested in how other stars and their different characteristics might affect abiogenesis on other planets as well. Stars are not stagnant; from when they first start fusing hydrogen on the main sequence, to when they reach the end stages of their lifetimes, they are outputting energy in the form of radiation and high energy particles. [13] Radiation can be, for example, x-ray coronal emissions or flares. The high energy particles emitted come in the forms of winds, and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). [13] As stars evolve, so do their emissions; younger stars tend to be the most active, meaning they have stronger winds, larger flaring events, and an increased frequency of CMEs. [13] This means that planets orbiting younger stars would endure more volatile stellar events that impact their habitable and abiogenesis zones, perhaps even making them transient.

M dwarf stars range in temperature from 2,000 to 3,500 K, and they exhibit variable activity over both short and long timescales. [14] For example, in one study of 177 M dwarfs of varying spectral times, 75% of them exhibited long-term variability. [14] Stellar activity is linked to rotation, [15] so the fraction of active stars tends to be much higher amongst M dwarfs compared to solar-type stars (G type). This is because they tend to have longer rotational braking times (timescale for stellar rotation to slow), and show stronger activity based on their period of rotation. [16] Deducing the right balance of stellar activity required to help prebiotic chemistry along without completely sterilizing the surface of a planet is complicated. It depends on multiple stellar and planetary factors, such as frequency of stellar events, intensity of stellar events, planetary atmosphere composition (radiation shielding effects), and the existence and strength of a planetary magnetic field (can provide further shielding).

M dwarf UV shortage

Although M dwarfs exhibit high variability, because of their low luminosities they emit less prebiotically relevant near-UV (NUV) radiation, which can lead to a shortage thereof. [17] Additionally, planetary atmospheres of specific compositions can further increase this shortage by functioning as UV shields due to the absorption features of their constituent molecules. This acts to reduce the amount of stellar UV reaching the surface, and can act as a barrier to UV-driven prebiotic chemistry. [17] For example, planets orbiting M dwarfs with inefficient atmospheric sinks of O2 and CO, combined with a CO2 rich atmosphere are more likely to built up UV shields such as O3 that can block the already low NUV flux reaching the surface from the star. [17]

Potential solutions

Effects like this can be theoretically overcome in a number of ways, both to do with characteristics of the star and the planet in question. Firstly, this issue could be overcome simply by having a thinner atmosphere that blocks less of the impinging UV. This kind of situation could arise in the case where elevated UV emission from the M dwarf strips the atmosphere of habitable zone planets orbiting close enough in. [18] Relative dose rates of UV to the surface would then increase. However, it is likely that the increased UV only served to promote destructive reactions such as photolysis of a prebiotically relevant RNA monomer. [17] This is because the thinner atmosphere was admitting destructive far-UV (FUV) wavelengths and making the environment inclement to abiogenesis. Thus, atmospheric stripping is not deemed an effective way to solve the M dwarf UV shortage problem.

Alternatively, researchers considered whether M dwarf flaring might play a role in providing the requisite UV for abiogenesis. Typically, these kinds of flaring events are deemed fatal for life, because of the increase in output of NUV. [19] Given that flaring is cyclical, there exists a possible scenario whereby photosensitive prebiotic chemistry is promoted during the flares, and ceases in the intervening periods. This kind of situation is analogous to terrestrial day/night cycles, and is proposed as the best mechanism to solve the shortage problem around particularly active M dwarfs. [17] That being said, further work is needed in order to constrain whether shorter duration/higher intensity UV flux from a flare is even sufficient to promote prebiotic chemistry. Additionally, intense flaring events run the risk of completely ablating a planetary atmosphere, which would sterilize the surface, and effectively counteract this proposed solution. [17]

Alternative stellar classes

Main sequence M dwarfs are not the only stellar host considered in studies of UV prebiotic chemistry. Younger M dwarfs, such as the pre-main sequence ones emit more of their bolometric luminosity in the NUV range. [20] Depending on how low their mass is, some of these stars remain in this state for up to 1 Gyr (billion year). From here, it is possible to begin assessing whether planets orbiting a star in these conditions might receive NUV insolation that is actually comparable to solar-like stars (G type). That being said, earlier type M dwarf stars have higher bolometric luminosity, which increases the likelihood of their orbiting habitable zone planets undergoing a runaway greenhouse state if they are orbiting closer in. Temperatures under these conditions would reach > 1000 K and easily vaporize any water on the surface. Consequently, aqueous-phase (in water) prebiotic chemistry is unlikely to proceed which is a definite barrier to aqueous prebiotic chemistry. [17]

For planets further from the star in the habitable zone during this pre-main sequence phase, they may achieve habitable conditions and even abiogenesis for up to Gyr timescales. [17] The caveat to this is that once their host star exits the pre-main sequence phase, the total bolometric luminosity will decrease, and the planets will no longer exist within the habitable zone. Unless clement temperatures are maintained by some intrinsic planetary mechanism such as greenhouse warming liquid water will freeze, and if life is not immediately killed off it would be confined to volcanic or subsurface reservoirs. [17] All the cons aside, planets in the habitable zones of these late-type, low mass pre-main sequence M dwarfs are still an area of focus for researchers interested in UV-driven prebiotic chemistry.

K-type

Going beyond M dwarf stars, main sequence K dwarf stars are also considered as possible hosts of habitable and abiogenetic planets. Based on a chemical pathway for photochemically building up prebiotic reservoirs, it is possible that hotter stars, such as spectral type K are better at powering prebiotic chemistry. [2] A main sequence K star (spectral class: K5), has a temperature of around 4400 K. [21] For stars cooler than this, and in the absence of cyclical stellar activity, the incident flux is too low for the planets that exist within the habitable zone to also exist within the abiogenesis zone. [2] This consequently sets a potential boundary on what kinds of stars are most likely to have sufficient overlap in their habitable and abiogenesis zones.

Prebiotic Earth UV conditions

Just as understanding the UV flux of different stars can somewhat constrain favorable conditions for abiogenesis, so does understanding what the UV environment would have looked like on a prebiotic Earth. Given certain atmospheric compositions, UV surface fluence is generally a function of albedo, and solar zenith angle (SZA). [22] In experimental situations where atmospheric composition is left as a free variable, it also heavily dictates not only the bolometric surface flux of UV, but also what particular wavelengths are transmitted that may or may not be harmful to prebiotic chemistry and abiogenesis. This presents the need for experiments to reduce the uncertainty still surrounding the planetary conditions and the surface UV at abiogenesis.[ citation needed ]

For consideration of the surficial UV conditions of a prebiotic Earth, there are 7 atmospheric gases that can influence UV attenuation and hence prebiotic chemistry: CO2, SO2, H2S, CH4, H2O, O2, and O3. For each of these gases, different constraints provide different estimates for their effect on UV transmission. Depending on the amount of transmission, different biologically effective doses (BEDs) of UV will be delivered to the surface; too little prohibits prebiotic chemistry, and too much is harmful. Additionally, solar UV input shapes the overall photochemistry of Earth's atmosphere which impacts the availability of chemical reactants.

Carbon dioxide (CO2)

One study showed that high levels of atmospheric CO2 can suppress UV-relevant prebiotic chemistry, [22] due to the argument that atmospheric CO2 would cut off UV fluence for wavelengths shorter than 204 nm. [4] This reduces the surface flux of photons at energies useful for prebiotic chemistry. At lower levels of atmospheric CO2 however, the transmitted UV can moderately enhance prebiotic chemistry. [22] This study found the overall effects of CO2 on the BED of UV to be minimal, in the absence of other absorbers. For the range of CO2 values evaluated, the variation of the biologically effective dose of radiation was <2 orders of magnitude. [22]

However, given the significant presence of other absorbers (below) that have absorption cross sections from 100-500 nm, they could have influenced the surface UV environment of an early Earth.

Sulfur dioxide (SO2)

SO2 strongly absorbs over a much wider range than CO2, but is conversely more vulnerable to loss via photolysis and oxidation reactions. [22] Volcanos are a significant source of SO2, and assuming levels of volcanic outgassing at abiogenesis (around 3.9 Ga) were comparable to today, [23] the build-up of SO2 would not significantly influence the surface UV environment. However, during transiently high levels of volcanic outgassing SO2 would build-up, and under these conditions could have heavily modified surface UV irradiance. [22] Higher levels of SO2 reduce BEDs by over 60 orders of magnitude, [22] which implies that UV-driven prebiotic chemistry might not have been sustained.

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S)

Like SO2, H2S is a strong and broad absorber of UV, and is primarily generated through volcanic outgassing. As a result of its vulnerability to atmospheric loss through photolysis and oxidation reactions, it is not expected that H2S would have been a significant constituent of a prebiotic environment, [22] let alone that it might have had an impact on prebiotic chemistry. [24] As with SO2, higher levels of H2S as a result of a transient increase in volcanic activity, may have affected the surface UV irradiation. The lower expected BEDs might have reduced the ability of some prebiotic chemical pathways to proceed. [22]

Methane (CH4)

In the presence of trace amounts of CO2, UV absorption by CH4 is considered negligible. [22] [25] This is because CH4 absorbs UV below 165 nm. As a result, CH4 is not very useful for constraining surface UV in the presence of CO2.

Water (H2O)

Primordial atmospheric water content is hard to constrain, but it is a strong UV absorber for wavelengths below 198 nm. [26] For plausible levels of H2O, UV flux is blocked below around 201 nm even without attenuation from CO2. [26] This means that regardless of the level of CO2 present at a given time, UV more energetic than around 200 nm would have probably been unavailable for prebiotic chemistry. [22]

Molecular oxygen (O2)

O2 is a strong shield for UV, but at levels expected from photochemical models, O2 does not provide strong constraints on the surface UV environment. [22] However, given that O2 is a stronger absorber than CO2, it is possible that O2 might have an effect in situations where CO2 is a smaller constituent in the atmosphere. [22] At such high levels, O2 may start to have a noticeable effect on UV transmission, but at abiogenesis it is unlikely that high levels were achieved given a strong reducing sink from volcanogenic gases, and a lack of a strong source. [27]

Ozone (O3)

Ozone is a well known greenhouse gas that acts as a shield for UV. It is generated in the atmosphere via photolysis of O2, hence its abundance is linked to that of O2. [28] At nominal O2 values expected for around abiogenesis, O3 is not expected to have a huge influence on the surface UV. [22]

Considerations for biosignatures

Prebiotic chemistry is heavily linked to UV irradiation from the host star of the planet. In particular, frequency flaring from M dwarf stars might be enough to drive prebiotic photochemistry on terrestrial planets within their habitable zone. This does require that the atmosphere can survive the flaring and not be fully ablated thus sterilizing the surface. But under those conditions, flaring rates for stars, and particularly M dwarfs early in their evolution is relevant to biosignature detection. [2]

Detecting a biosignature requires finding a planet where life has existed long enough to noticeably change the planet in detectable ways either through its surface or atmosphere (see: biosphere). Given that UV impacts prebiotic chemistry, understanding stellar UV variations is an important step on the way to finding potential candidates for biosignature searches, [29] as well as understanding more about abiogenesis on Earth.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miller–Urey experiment</span> Experiment testing the origin of life

The Miller–Urey experiment (or Miller experiment) was an experiment in chemical synthesis carried out in 1952 that simulated the conditions thought at the time to be present in the atmosphere of the early, prebiotic Earth. It is seen as one of the first successful experiments demonstrating the synthesis of organic compounds from inorganic constituents in an origin of life scenario. The experiment used methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3), hydrogen (H2), in ratio 2:2:1, and water (H2O). Applying an electric arc (the latter simulating lightning) resulted in the production of amino acids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habitable zone</span> Orbits where planets may have liquid surface water

In astronomy and astrobiology, the habitable zone (HZ), or more precisely the circumstellar habitable zone (CHZ), is the range of orbits around a star within which a planetary surface can support liquid water given sufficient atmospheric pressure. The bounds of the HZ are based on Earth's position in the Solar System and the amount of radiant energy it receives from the Sun. Due to the importance of liquid water to Earth's biosphere, the nature of the HZ and the objects within it may be instrumental in determining the scope and distribution of planets capable of supporting Earth-like extraterrestrial life and intelligence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">K-type main-sequence star</span> Stellar classification

A K-type main-sequence star, also referred to as a K-type dwarf, or orange dwarf, is a main-sequence (hydrogen-burning) star of spectral type K and luminosity class V. These stars are intermediate in size between red M-type main-sequence stars and yellow/white G-type main-sequence stars. They have masses between 0.6 and 0.9 times the mass of the Sun and surface temperatures between 3,900 and 5,300 K. These stars are of particular interest in the search for extraterrestrial life due to their stability and long lifespan. Well-known examples include Alpha Centauri B and Epsilon Indi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">F-type main-sequence star</span> Stellar classification

An F-type main-sequence star is a main-sequence, hydrogen-fusing star of spectral type F and luminosity class V. These stars have from 1.0 to 1.4 times the mass of the Sun and surface temperatures between 6,000 and 7,600 K.Tables VII and VIII. This temperature range gives the F-type stars a whitish hue when observed by the atmosphere. Because a main-sequence star is referred to as a dwarf star, this class of star may also be termed a yellow-white dwarf. Notable examples include Procyon A, Gamma Virginis A and B, and KIC 8462852.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Planetary habitability</span> Known extent to which a planet is suitable for life

Planetary habitability is the measure of a planet's or a natural satellite's potential to develop and maintain environments hospitable to life. Life may be generated directly on a planet or satellite endogenously or be transferred to it from another body, through a hypothetical process known as panspermia. Environments do not need to contain life to be considered habitable nor are accepted habitable zones (HZ) the only areas in which life might arise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atmosphere of Mars</span> Layer of gases surrounding planet Mars

The atmosphere of Mars is the layer of gases surrounding Mars. It is primarily composed of carbon dioxide (95%), molecular nitrogen (2.85%), and argon (2%). It also contains trace levels of water vapor, oxygen, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and noble gases. The atmosphere of Mars is much thinner than Earth's. The average surface pressure is only about 610 pascals (0.088 psi) which is less than 1% of the Earth's value.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ocean world</span> Planet containing a significant amount of water or other liquid

An ocean world, ocean planet, panthalassic planet, maritime world, water world or aquaplanet, is a type of planet that contains a substantial amount of water in the form of oceans, as part of its hydrosphere, either beneath the surface, as subsurface oceans, or on the surface, potentially submerging all dry land. The term ocean world is also used sometimes for astronomical bodies with an ocean composed of a different fluid or thalassogen, such as lava, ammonia or hydrocarbons. The study of extraterrestrial oceans is referred to as planetary oceanography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gliese 581d</span> Contested super-Earth orbiting Gliese 581

Gliese 581d is a doubtful, and frequently disputed, exoplanet candidate orbiting within the Gliese 581 system, approximately 20.4 light-years away in the Libra constellation. It was the third planet claimed in the system and the fourth or fifth in order from the star. Multiple subsequent studies found that the planetary signal in fact originates from stellar activity, and thus the planet does not exist, but this remains disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habitability of natural satellites</span> Measure of the potential of natural satellites to have environments hospitable to life

The habitability of natural satellites is the potential of moons to provide habitats for life, though it is not an indicator that they harbor it. Natural satellites are expected to outnumber planets by a large margin and the study of their habitability is therefore important to astrobiology and the search for extraterrestrial life. There are, nevertheless, significant environmental variables specific to moons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gliese 581g</span> Former candidate super-Earth orbiting Gliese 581

Gliese 581g was a candidate exoplanet postulated to orbit within the Gliese 581 system, twenty light-years from Earth. It was discovered by the Lick–Carnegie Exoplanet Survey, and was the sixth planet claimed to orbit the star; however, its existence could not be confirmed by the European Southern Observatory (ESO) / High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS) survey team, and was ultimately refuted. It was thought to be near the middle of the habitable zone of its star, meaning it could sustain liquid water—a necessity for all known life—on its surface, if there are favorable atmospheric conditions on the planet.

Stellar chemistry is the study of chemical composition of astronomical objects; stars in particular, hence the name stellar chemistry. The significance of stellar chemical composition is an open ended question at this point. Some research asserts that a greater abundance of certain elements in the stellar mass are necessary for a star's inner solar system to be habitable over long periods of time. The hypothesis being that the "abundance of these elements make the star cooler and cause it to evolve more slowly, thereby giving planets in its habitable zone more time to develop life as we know it." Stellar abundance of oxygen also appears to be critical to the length of time newly developed planets exist in a habitable zone around their host star. Researchers postulate that if our own sun had a lower abundance of oxygen, the Earth would have ceased to "live" in a habitable zone a billion years ago, long before complex organisms had the opportunity to evolve.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habitability of red dwarf systems</span> Possible factors for life around red dwarf stars

The theorized habitability of red dwarf systems is determined by a large number of factors. Modern evidence indicates that planets in red dwarf systems are unlikely to be habitable, due to their low stellar flux, high probability of tidal locking and thus likely lack of magnetospheres and atmospheres, small circumstellar habitable zones and the high stellar variation experienced by planets of red dwarf stars. However, the sheer numbers and longevity of red dwarfs could provide ample opportunity to realize any small possibility of habitability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superhabitable world</span> Hypothetical type of planet or moon that may be better-suited for life than Earth

A superhabitable world is a hypothetical type of planet or moon that is better suited than Earth for the emergence and evolution of life. The concept was introduced in a 2014 paper by René Heller and John Armstrong, in which they criticized the language used in the search for habitable exoplanets and proposed clarifications. The authors argued that knowing whether a world is located within the star's habitable zone is insufficient to determine its habitability, that the principle of mediocrity cannot adequately explain why Earth should represent the archetypal habitable world, and that the prevailing model of characterization was geocentric or anthropocentric in nature. Instead, they proposed a biocentric approach that prioritized astrophysical characteristics affecting the abundance and variety of life on a world's surface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TRAPPIST-1</span> Ultra-cool red dwarf star in the constellation Aquarius

TRAPPIST-1 is a cool red dwarf star with seven known exoplanets. It lies in the constellation Aquarius about 40.66 light-years away from Earth, and has a surface temperature of about 2,566 K. Its radius is slightly larger than Jupiter and it has a mass of about 9% of the Sun. It is estimated to be 7.6 billion years old, making it older than the Solar System. The discovery of the star was first published in 2000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proxima Centauri b</span> Terrestrial planet orbiting Proxima Centauri

Proxima Centauri b, sometimes referred to as Alpha Centauri Cb, is an exoplanet orbiting within the habitable zone of the red dwarf star Proxima Centauri, which is the closest star to the Sun and part of the larger triple star system Alpha Centauri. It is about 4.2 light-years from Earth in the constellation Centaurus, making it and Proxima d, along with the currently disputed Proxima c, the closest known exoplanets to the Solar System.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TRAPPIST-1e</span> Earth-size exoplanet orbiting TRAPPIST-1

TRAPPIST-1e, also designated as 2MASS J23062928-0502285 e, is a rocky, close-to-Earth-sized exoplanet orbiting within the habitable zone around the ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1, located 40.7 light-years away from Earth in the constellation of Aquarius. Astronomers used the transit method to find the exoplanet, a method that measures the dimming of a star when a planet crosses in front of it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habitable Exoplanets Observatory</span> Proposed space observatory to characterize exoplanets atmospheres

The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) is a space telescope concept that would be optimized to search for and image Earth-size habitable exoplanets in the habitable zones of their stars, where liquid water can exist. HabEx would aim to understand how common terrestrial worlds beyond the Solar System may be and determine the range of their characteristics. It would be an optical, UV and infrared telescope that would also use spectrographs to study planetary atmospheres and eclipse starlight with either an internal coronagraph or an external starshade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habitability of yellow dwarf systems</span> Likelihood of finding extraterrestrial life in yellow dwarf systems

Habitability of yellow dwarf systems defines the suitability for life of exoplanets belonging to yellow dwarf stars. These systems are the object of study among the scientific community because they are considered the most suitable for harboring living organisms, together with those belonging to K-type stars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prebiotic atmosphere</span>

The prebiotic atmosphere is the second atmosphere present on Earth before today's biotic, oxygen-rich third atmosphere, and after the first atmosphere of Earth's formation. The formation of the Earth, roughly 4.5 billion years ago, involved multiple collisions and coalescence of planetary embryos. This was followed by a <100 million year period on Earth where a magma ocean was present, the atmosphere was mainly steam, and surface temperatures reached up to 8,000 K (14,000 °F). Earth's surface then cooled and the atmosphere stabilized, establishing the prebiotic atmosphere. The environmental conditions during this time period were quite different from today: the Sun was ~30% dimmer overall yet brighter at ultraviolet and x-ray wavelengths, there was a liquid ocean, it is unknown if there were continents but oceanic islands were likely, Earth's interior chemistry was different, and there was a larger flux of impactors hitting Earth's surface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Habitable zone for complex life</span>

A Habitable Zone for Complex Life (HZCL) is a range of distances from a star suitable for complex aerobic life. Different types of limitations preventing complex life give rise to different zones. Conventional habitable zones are based on compatibility with water. Most zones start at a distance from the host star and then end at a distance farther from the star. A planet or exoplanet would need to orbit inside the boundaries of this zone. With multiple zonal constraints, the zones would need to overlap for the planet to support complex life. The requirements for bacterial life produce much larger zones than those for complex life, which requires a very narrow zone.

References

  1. ↑ Armas-Vázquez, M. Zulema; González-Espinoza, Cristina E.; Segura, Antígona; Heredia, Alejandro; Miranda-Rosete, Arturo (2023-06-01). "Impact of M Dwarfs Ultraviolet Radiation on Prebiotic Chemistry: The Case of Adenine". Astrobiology. 23 (6): 705–722. doi:10.1089/ast.2022.0050. ISSN   1531-1074. PMID   37115581. S2CID   258375202.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Rimmer, Paul B.; Xu, Jianfeng; Thompson, Samantha J.; Gillen, Ed; Sutherland, John D.; Queloz, Didier (2018-08-03). "The origin of RNA precursors on exoplanets". Science Advances. 4 (8): eaar3302. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar3302. ISSN   2375-2548. PMC   6070314 . PMID   30083602.
  3. ↑ "Exoplanet and Candidate Statistics". exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ranjan, Sukrit; Sasselov, Dimitar D. (January 2016). "Influence of the UV Environment on the Synthesis of Prebiotic Molecules". Astrobiology. 16 (1): 68–88. arXiv: 1511.00698 . doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1359. ISSN   1531-1074. PMID   26789356. S2CID   21542000.
  5. 1 2 Sagan, Carl (April 1973). "Ultraviolet selection pressure on the earliest organisms". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 39 (1): 195–200. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(73)90216-6. hdl: 2060/19710028156 . ISSN   0022-5193. PMID   4741712. S2CID   40691116.
  6. ↑ Sleep, Norman H. (September 2018). "Geological and Geochemical Constraints on the Origin and Evolution of Life". Astrobiology. 18 (9): 1199–1219. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1778. ISSN   1531-1074. PMID   30124324. S2CID   52039665.
  7. ↑ Rosenberg, R. A.; Abu Haija, M.; Ryan, P. J. (2008-10-21). "Chiral-Selective Chemistry Induced by Spin-Polarized Secondary Electrons from a Magnetic Substrate". Physical Review Letters. 101 (17): 178301. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.178301. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   18999792.
  8. ↑ Sarker, Palash K.; Takahashi, Jun-ichi; Obayashi, Yumiko; Kaneko, Takeo; Kobayashi, Kensei (June 2013). "Photo-alteration of hydantoins against UV light and its relevance to prebiotic chemistry". Advances in Space Research. 51 (12): 2235–2240. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2013.01.029. ISSN   0273-1177.
  9. 1 2 3 Powner, Matthew W.; Gerland, Béatrice; Sutherland, John D. (May 2009). "Synthesis of activated pyrimidine ribonucleotides in prebiotically plausible conditions". Nature. 459 (7244): 239–242. doi:10.1038/nature08013. PMID   19444213. S2CID   4412117.
  10. ↑ Ferris, J. P.; Chen, C. T. (May 1975). "Chemical evolution. XXVI. Photochemistry of methane, nitrogen, and water mixtures as a model for the atmosphere of the primitive earth". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 97 (11): 2962–2967. doi:10.1021/ja00844a007. ISSN   0002-7863. PMID   1133344.
  11. ↑ Ferris, J. P.; Chen, C. T. (May 1975). "Chemical evolution. XXVI. Photochemistry of methane, nitrogen, and water mixtures as a model for the atmosphere of the primitive earth". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 97 (11): 2962–2967. doi:10.1021/ja00844a007. ISSN   0002-7863. PMID   1133344.
  12. 1 2 Ritson, Dougal; Sutherland, John D. (2012-09-30). "Prebiotic synthesis of simple sugars by photoredox systems chemistry". Nature Chemistry. 4 (11): 895–899. doi:10.1038/nchem.1467. ISSN   1755-4330. PMC   3589744 . PMID   23089863.
  13. 1 2 3 Vidotto, A. (August 2022). "Stellar Space Weather Effects on Potentially Habitable Planets". Astronomy in Focus. 1. arXiv: 2211.15396 .
  14. 1 2 Mignon, L.; Meunier, N.; Delfosse, X.; Bonfils, X.; Santos, N. C.; Forveille, T.; Gaisné, G.; Astudillo-Defru, N.; Lovis, C.; Udry, S. (July 2023). "Characterisation of stellar activity of M dwarfs". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 675: A168. arXiv: 2303.03998 . doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244249 . ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   257378522.
  15. ↑ Wright, Nicholas J.; Drake, Jeremy J.; Mamajek, Eric E.; Henry, Gregory W. (2011-11-21). "The Stellar-Activity-Rotation Relationship and the Evolution of Stellar Dynamos". The Astrophysical Journal. 743 (1): 48. arXiv: 1109.4634 . doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/743/1/48 . ISSN   0004-637X. S2CID   11688215.
  16. ↑ Engle, Scott G.; Guinan, Edward F. (2018-02-27). "The Rotation–Age Relationship of M Dwarfs: A Progress Report of the Living with a Red Dwarf Program". Research Notes of the AAS. 2 (1): 34. doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/aab1f8 . ISSN   2515-5172.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ranjan, Sukrit; Wordsworth, Robin; Sasselov, Dimitar D. (2017-07-11). "The Surface UV Environment on Planets Orbiting M Dwarfs: Implications for Prebiotic Chemistry and the Need for Experimental Follow-up". The Astrophysical Journal. 843 (2): 110. arXiv: 1705.02350 . doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa773e . ISSN   1538-4357.
  18. ↑ Tian, Feng; Kasting, James F.; Solomon, Stanley C. (January 2009). "Thermal escape of carbon from the early Martian atmosphere". Geophysical Research Letters. 36 (2). doi: 10.1029/2008gl036513 . ISSN   0094-8276. S2CID   129208608.
  19. ↑ Segura, Antígona; Walkowicz, Lucianne M.; Meadows, Victoria; Kasting, James; Hawley, Suzanne (September 2010). "The Effect of a Strong Stellar Flare on the Atmospheric Chemistry of an Earth-like Planet Orbiting an M Dwarf". Astrobiology. 10 (7): 751–771. doi:10.1089/ast.2009.0376. ISSN   1531-1074. PMC   3103837 . PMID   20879863.
  20. ↑ Shkolnik, Evgenya L.; Barman, Travis S. (2014-09-03). "Hazmat. I. The Evolution of Far-Uv and Near-Uv Emission from Early M Stars". The Astronomical Journal. 148 (4): 64. arXiv: 1407.1344 . doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/4/64 . ISSN   1538-3881. S2CID   119179281.
  21. ↑ "Spectral Types". sites.uni.edu. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Ranjan, Sukrit; Sasselov, Dimitar D. (March 2017). "Constraints on the Early Terrestrial Surface UV Environment Relevant to Prebiotic Chemistry". Astrobiology. 17 (3): 169–204. arXiv: 1610.06223 . doi:10.1089/ast.2016.1519. ISSN   1531-1074. PMID   28323482. S2CID   4371017.
  23. ↑ Bada, Jeffrey L.; Fegley, Bruce; Miller, Stanley L.; Lazcano, Antonio; Cleaves, H. James; Hazen, Robert M.; Chalmers, John (2007-02-16). "Debating Evidence for the Origin of Life on Earth". Science. 315 (5814): 937–939. doi:10.1126/science.315.5814.937c. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   17303735. S2CID   9118944.
  24. ↑ Clark, Peter D.; Dowling, Norman I.; Huang, Minming (1998-08-01). "Comments on the Role of H2S in the Chemistry of Earth's Early Atmosphere and in Prebiotic Synthesis". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 47 (2): 127–132. doi:10.1007/PL00006369. ISSN   1432-1432. PMID   9694661. S2CID   5699045.
  25. ↑ Kasting, J. F. (1998). "Methane in the Early Atmosphere of the Earth". Mineralogical Magazine. 62A (2): 751–752. doi:10.1180/minmag.1998.62a.2.63. ISSN   0026-461X.
  26. 1 2 Ranjan, Sukrit; Kufner, Corinna L.; Lozano, Gabriella G.; Todd, Zoe R.; Haseki, Azra; Sasselov, Dimitar D. (March 2022). "UV Transmission in Natural Waters on Prebiotic Earth". Astrobiology. 22 (3): 242–262. doi:10.1089/ast.2020.2422. ISSN   1531-1074. PMC   8968845 . PMID   34939825.
  27. ↑ Calabrese, S.; Aiuppa, A.; Allard, P.; Bagnato, E.; Bellomo, S.; Brusca, L.; D’Alessandro, W.; Parello, F. (2011-12-01). "Atmospheric sources and sinks of volcanogenic elements in a basaltic volcano (Etna, Italy)". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 75 (23): 7401–7425. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.09.040. ISSN   0016-7037.
  28. ↑ "How is Ozone Formed? | SCDHEC". scdhec.gov. Retrieved 2023-11-30.
  29. ↑ Pallé, Enric (2018), "The Detectability of Earth's Biosignatures Across Time", Handbook of Exoplanets, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 3225–3241, arXiv: 1802.09367 , doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7_70, ISBN   978-3-319-55332-0, S2CID   56087342 , retrieved 2023-12-08
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.