Substitute checks in the United States

Last updated
Image Replacement Document
(Substitute Check)
Subcheck FRONT.png
Front view of a substitute check
Subcheck BACK.png
Rear view of a substitute check

A substitute check (also called an Image Replacement Document or IRD) [1] is a negotiable instrument that is a digital reproduction of an original paper check. As a negotiable payment instrument in the United States, a substitute check maintains the status of a "legal check" in lieu of the original paper check, as authorized by the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (the Check 21 Act). Instead of presenting the original paper checks, financial institutions and payment-processing centers transmit data from substitute checks electronically through the settlement process, through the United States Federal Reserve System, [2] or by clearing the deposits on the basis of private agreements between member financial institutions. Financial institutions that process substitute checks in accordance with such private agreements are typically members of a clearinghouse that operates under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). [3]

Contents

A substitute check is recognized as a legal check as long as the instrument meets requirements, which include the faithful reproduction of the paper check and warranty of the instrument by the "reconverting bank"—the financial institution that created the substitute check or the first financial institution that transferred or presented it during the check-clearing process. [4] Substitute checks are also subject to the UCC, federal and state check laws, and consumer-rights regulations. [5] Although a substitute check is subject to the UCC and state and federal check laws, the Check 21 Act takes precedence over these other laws and regulations for this instrument. [6]

Specifications and standards

The Accredited Standards Committee X9 (ASC X9), a standards development committee accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), maintains, promotes, and supports technical financial standards for procedures, delivery, and transactions for financial products and services that include Image Replacement Documents, and other financial instruments. [7] American National Standard (ANS) X9.100-140 covers specifications for the content, processing, and quality of Image Replacement Documents specifically. [8]

Certain standards that exist for paper checks also apply to Image Replacement Documents. These standards include ANS X9.100-160-2 (Magnetic Ink Printing (MICR)), Part 2, External Processing Code (EPC) Field Use); [9] ANS X9.100-181 (Specifications for TIFF Image Format for Image Exchange); and ANS X9.100-187 (Specifications for Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data - Domestic) that also cover electronic deposits using mobile phones. [8] [10] [11]

Eligible payment items for truncation and reconversion

Under the Check 21 Act, all U.S. paper checks and check-like instruments are eligible for truncation and reconversion to substitute checks, including consumer (personal) checks, commercial (business) checks, money orders, traveler's checks, cash advance or convenience checks tied to credit and charge card accounts, controlled disbursement checks, and payable through drafts, in addition to government warrants and U.S. Treasury checks. [12] [1] [13] The Check 21 Act permits any financial institution (such as a commercial bank or credit union) that participates in the check collection process to remove or truncate the original paper check from the forward collection or return process and reconvert the paper check to a substitute check. The removal of the original paper check from either process does not require an existing agreement beforehand between the bank of first deposit (BOFD) and the "paying bank." [5] [12]

The elimination of the paper check from the clearing process saves the banking and treasury management industries handling, sorting, transporting, storing, safeguarding, and mailing costs. After the financial institution truncates the original paper check and reconverts it to a substitute check, the financial institution can then store or archive the paper check, return the paper check to its own customer according to state law, or later destroy the paper check.

A properly prepared substitute check is considered the legal equivalent of the original paper check that can be accepted for payment or proof of payment in the same manner as the original check. Every substitute check must adhere to the following requirements before it can be recognized as the legal equivalent of the original check:

  1. The substitute check must accurately represent all information depicted on the front and back of the original paper check at the time the financial institution removes or truncates the check from the process, including the names of the payor and payee, the courtesy and legal amounts, endorsements, and encoding information, among other details.
  2. The substitute check must accurately represent the MICR line of the original check.
  3. The substitute check must bear the legend "This is a LEGAL COPY of your check. You can use it the same way you would use the original check."
  4. The financial institution or processor must provide a warranty for the substitute check. This warranty must be provided by the financial institution when it removes or truncates the original paper check from the forward collection or return process and reconverts the paper check to a substitute check.
  5. The financial institution or processor that truncated the original check must follow ASC X9.100-140 standards in the capture of check images and MICR data when it produces the substitute check. [2]

Image statements that include a series of pictures or images of original paper checks and/or substitute checks, photocopies of the original checks, and images of checks posted online are not recognized as the legal equivalents of substitute checks. [14] Unlike a substitute check, a photocopy of a check cannot be presented through the check clearing process for settlement because the photocopy of the check does not adhere strictly to the requirements for substitute checks under the Check 21 Act. [5]

Since substitute checks are considered legal checks, substitute checks are subject to existing check laws and regulations. Other laws and regulations that govern substitute checks in the United States include the Expedited Funds Availability Act, Article 3 (Negotiable Instruments), [15] and Article 4 (Bank Deposits and Collections) [16] of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), along with a variety of state and federal regulatory laws. U.S. federal laws that also affect substitute checks include Federal Reserve regulations that provide for recrediting the amount of the substitute check in the case of fraud and duplicate payments caused by settlement of both the substitute check and the original check used for creating the substitute check. [2] [5] [12] If any state law, federal law, or provision of the UCC conflicts with the Check 21 Act, the Check 21 Act takes precedence to the extent of the inconsistencies among those laws and provisions. [6]

Clearing process

Forward collection process

Each substitute check processed for forward collection is encoded with a "4" as the External Processing Code (EPC) in position 44 of the MICR line as required under ANS X9.90. [17] An example of the forward collection process for substitute checks involves the following steps for financial institutions that process deposits through the Federal Reserve System: [2]

  1. The payee endorses the original paper check and presents it for deposit at the financial institution, such as a commercial bank or credit union (referred to as the depository financial institution).
  2. The depository financial institution (Bank 1 referred to as the bank of first deposit or BOFD) stamps its endorsement on the rear of the original check.
  3. Bank 1 captures an image of the front and back of the original check and the MICR line data from the front of the check. Bank 1 then removes or truncates the original check from the clearing process and uses the check image, MICR data, its own electronic endorsement, and the electronic endorsements to create a substitute check.
  4. Bank 1 electronically transmits the check image and the MICR line data captured from the original check to the paying bank (Bank 2) for settlement. If no agreement exists between Bank 1 and Bank 2 to exchange check images and data, Bank 1 must provide either the original check or the legal equivalent of the substitute check to Bank 2.
  5. As the paying bank, Bank 2 uses check image and MICR data or information from the substitute check received from Bank 1 to process the item during the normal course of settlement.
  6. After the settlement process, Bank 2 provides a copy of the substitute check to the customer who wrote the original check or includes information about the substitute check in that customer's monthly or periodic statement.

Any financial institution that participates in the forward collection (or return) process can become the reconverting financial institution if it creates the substitute check for transmittal and settlement.

Return process for dishonored checks

If a substitute check must be returned unpaid because of insufficient funds (a dishonored or bounced check), the paying bank (Bank 2) stamps the item NSF (non-sufficient funds) as the reason for the return. In this case, Bank 2 encodes a "5" as the EPC on the MICR line to identify the substitute check according to ANS X9.90, [17] along with the routing number of the depository financial institution and the dollar amount of the substitute check. Bank 2 encodes this information on a return strip, perforated strip, or carrier document that the financial institution attaches to the dishonored substitute check. [17] The paying bank then returns the dishonored substitute check through the routing process to the BOFD (Bank 1) for further handling. Once Bank 1 receives the dishonored substitute check, the financial institution issues a charge back notice to its customer who deposited or offered the check for settlement. [2]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dishonoured cheque</span> Cheque that a bank declines to pay

Dishonoured cheques are cheques that a bank on which is drawn declines to pay (“honour”). There are a number of reasons why a bank would refuse to honour a cheque, with non-sufficient funds (NSF) being the most common one, indicating that there are insufficient cleared funds in the account on which the cheque was drawn. An NSF check may be referred to as a bad check, dishonored check, bounced check, cold check, rubber check, returned item, or hot check. Lost or bounced checks result in late payments and affect the relationship with customers. In England and Wales and Australia, such cheques are typically returned endorsed "Refer to drawer", an instruction to contact the person issuing the cheque for an explanation as to why it was not paid. If there are funds in an account, but insufficient cleared funds, the cheque is normally endorsed “Present again”, by which time the funds should have cleared.

Magnetic ink character recognition code, known in short as MICR code, is a character recognition technology used mainly by the banking industry to streamline the processing and clearance of cheques and other documents. MICR encoding, called the MICR line, is at the bottom of cheques and other vouchers and typically includes the document-type indicator, bank code, bank account number, cheque number, cheque amount and a control indicator. The format for the bank code and bank account number is country-specific.

Cheque clearing or bank clearance is the process of moving cash from the bank on which a cheque is drawn to the bank in which it was deposited, usually accompanied by the movement of the cheque to the paying bank, either in the traditional physical paper form or digitally under a cheque truncation system. This process is called the clearing cycle and normally results in a credit to the account at the bank of deposit, and an equivalent debit to the account at the bank on which it was drawn, with a corresponding adjustment of accounts of the banks themselves. If there are not enough funds in the account when the cheque arrived at the issuing bank, the cheque would be returned as a dishonoured cheque marked as non-sufficient funds.

In the United States, an ABA routing transit number is a nine-digit code printed on the bottom of checks to identify the financial institution on which it was drawn. The American Bankers Association (ABA) developed the system in 1910 to facilitate the sorting, bundling, and delivering of paper checks to the drawer's bank for debit to the drawer's account.

The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act is a United States federal law, Pub. L. 108–100 (text)(PDF), that was enacted on October 28, 2003 by the 108th U.S. Congress. The Check 21 Act took effect one year later on October 28, 2004. The law allows the recipient of the original paper check to create a digital version of the original check, a process known as check truncation, into an electronic format called a "substitute check", thereby eliminating the need for further handling of the physical document. In essence, the recipient bank no longer returns the paper check, but effectively e-mails an image of both sides of the check to the bank it is drawn upon.

Cheque fraud, or check fraud, refers to a category of criminal acts that involve making the unlawful use of cheques in order to illegally acquire or borrow funds that do not exist within the account balance or account-holder's legal ownership. Most methods involve taking advantage of the float to draw out these funds. Specific kinds of cheque fraud include cheque kiting, where funds are deposited before the end of the float period to cover the fraud, and paper hanging, where the float offers the opportunity to write fraudulent cheques but the account is never replenished.

The Australian financial system consists of the arrangements covering the borrowing and lending of funds and the transfer of ownership of financial claims in Australia, comprising:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cheque</span> Method of payment

A cheque, or check, is a document that orders a bank to pay a specific amount of money from a person's account to the person in whose name the cheque has been issued. The person writing the cheque, known as the drawer, has a transaction banking account where the money is held. The drawer writes various details including the monetary amount, date, and a payee on the cheque, and signs it, ordering their bank, known as the drawee, to pay the amount of money stated to the payee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clearing (finance)</span> All activities from the time a commitment is made for a financial transaction until it is settled

In banking and finance, clearing denotes all activities from the time a commitment is made for a transaction until it is settled. This process turns the promise of payment into the actual movement of money from one account to another. Clearing houses were formed to facilitate such transactions among banks.

A payment system is any system used to settle financial transactions through the transfer of monetary value. This includes the institutions, payment instruments such as payment cards, people, rules, procedures, standards, and technologies that make its exchange possible. A common type of payment system, called an operational network, links bank accounts and provides for monetary exchange using bank deposits. Some payment systems also include credit mechanisms, which are essentially a different aspect of payment.

In banking, a post-dated cheque is a cheque written by the drawer (payer) for a date in the future.

Remote deposit or mobile deposit is the ability of a bank customer to deposit a cheque into a bank account from a remote location, without having to physically deliver the cheque to the bank. This was originally accomplished by scanning a digital image of a cheque into a computer then transmitting that image to the bank, but is now accomplished with a smartphone. The practice became legal in the United States in 2004 when the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act took effect, though banks are not required to implement the system.

In banking, a lockbox is a service offered to organizations by commercial banks to simplify collection and processing of accounts receivable by having those organizations' customers' payments mailed directly to a location accessible by the bank.

Bank regulation in the United States is highly fragmented compared with other G10 countries, where most countries have only one bank regulator. In the U.S., banking is regulated at both the federal and state level. Depending on the type of charter a banking organization has and on its organizational structure, it may be subject to numerous federal and state banking regulations. Apart from the bank regulatory agencies the U.S. maintains separate securities, commodities, and insurance regulatory agencies at the federal and state level, unlike Japan and the United Kingdom. Bank examiners are generally employed to supervise banks and to ensure compliance with regulations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Warrant of payment</span> Written order instructing or authorizing payment

In financial transactions, a warrant is a written order by one person that instructs or authorises another person to pay a specified recipient a specific amount of money or supply goods at a specific date. A warrant may or may not be negotiable and may be a bearer instrument that authorises payment to the warrant holder on demand or after a specific date. Governments and businesses may pay wages and other accounts by issuing warrants instead of cheques.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cheque truncation</span> Process of scanning cheques to produce their electronic copies

Cheque truncation is a cheque clearance system that involves the digitization of a physical paper cheque into a substitute electronic form for transmission to the paying bank. The process of cheque clearance, involving data matching and verification, is done using digital images instead of paper copies.

The Clearing House is a banking association and payments company owned by the largest commercial banks in the United States. The Clearing House is the parent organization of The Clearing House Payments Company L.L.C., which owns and operates core payments system infrastructure in the United States, including ACH, wire payments, check image clearing, and real-time payments through the RTP network, a modern real-time payment system for the U.S.

Cheque Truncation System (CTS) or Image-based Clearing System (ICS), in India, is a project of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), commenced in 2010, for faster clearing of cheques. CTS is based on a cheque truncation or online image-based cheque clearing system where cheque images and magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) data are captured at the collecting bank branch and transmitted electronically.

A substitute check or cheque, also called an image cash letter (ICL), clearing replacement document (CRD), or image replacement document (IRD), is a negotiable instrument used in electronic banking systems to represent a physical paper cheque (check). It may be wholly digital from payment initiation to clearing and settlement or it may be a digital reproduction (truncation) of an original paper check.

In the United States, remotely created checks are orders of payment created by the payee using a telephone or the Internet.

References

  1. 1 2 "Frequently Asked Questions: Consumer Compliance FAQ for Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21) and the Implementing Regulation (12 CFR 229)". Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. Retrieved May 2, 2011.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act Foundation for Check 21 Compliance Training". Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. Retrieved May 28, 2009.
  3. "The Electronic Check Clearing House Organization (ECCHO): Rules Summary" (PDF). Electronic Check Clearing House Organization. December 2013. p. 2. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  4. Will Kenton (April 8, 2019), Government & Policy: Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21). Investopedia. Retrieved March 28, 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Consumer Guide to Check 21 and Substitute Checks" (PDF). U.S. Federal Reserve Board. February 16, 2004. Retrieved March 28, 2020.
  6. 1 2 Substitute checks: Relation to other law. 12 C.F.R. § 229.59 (2009). Retrieved March 28, 2020.
  7. "Financial Global Standards: X9 − An Introduction to the Financial Global Standards (PPTX)". The Accredited Standards Committee X9, Inc. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  8. 1 2 "Substitute checks: Development of processing and quality standards" (PDF). ECCHO® (Electronic Check Clearing House Organization). Retrieved 17 April 2015.
  9. "MICR External Processing Code (EPC), ANSI X9.100-160-2-2020". American National Standards Institute. January 31, 2020. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  10. "Federal Reserve Adoption of DSTU X9.37-2003: Image Cash Letter Customer Documentation. Version 1.9" (PDF). United States Federal Reserve Bank. April 26, 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  11. "Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data". American National Standards Institute. January 6, 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  12. 1 2 3 "The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act ("Check 21"): Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). U.S. Department of Justice. October 28, 2004. Retrieved May 30, 2009.
  13. "Check 21 Resource Document" (PDF). NACHA. March 2004. Retrieved 17 April 2015.
  14. "Check 21: Q's and A's". U.S. Comptroller of the Currency. Retrieved May 30, 2009.
  15. Negotiable instrument. 3 U.C.C. § 104 (2009). Retrieved October 11, 2009.
  16. Electronic presentment. 4 U.C.C. § 110 (2009). Retrieved October 11, 2009.
  17. 1 2 3 "Check 21 Resource Document". Electronic Check Clearing House Organization. 2009. Retrieved May 28, 2009.

External sources