Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal

Last updated

The Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT), [1] formerly the Iraqi Special Tribunal [2] and sometimes referred to as the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal, is a body established under Iraqi national law to try Iraqi nationals or residents accused of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes or other serious crimes committed between 1968 and 2003. It organized the trial of Saddam Hussein and other members of his Ba'ath Party regime.

Contents

The court was set up by a specific statute issued under the Coalition Provisional Authority and was reaffirmed under the jurisdiction of the Iraqi Interim Government. In 2005 it was renamed after the constitution established that "Special or exceptional courts may not be established." [3] The Transitional Administrative Law (TAL) promulgated by the Iraq Governing Council before the restoration of Iraqi sovereignty preserved and continued the Iraq Special Tribunal Statute in force and effect.

The court was responsible for the trial of Saddam Hussein, Ali Hassan al-Majid (also known as "Chemical Ali"), former vice president Taha Yassin Ramadan, former deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz and other former senior officials in the deposed Ba'athist regime.

Judges

The tribunal follows the inquisitorial system which is standard in Iraq and uses investigative judges. Trials are heard before a panel of the five trial judges, who conduct hearings, pronounce judgements and impose the sentences, without using a jury. There is also a separate Appeals Chamber, with nine judges, a prosecutions department and an administrative department. The statute of the court allows for international judges to be appointed on the request of the court and approval of the Council of Ministers, but none have yet been appointed. Judges were initially appointed to a five-year term by the Iraqi Governing Council, in consultation with the Iraqi Judicial Council.

For security reasons, the names of the judges were not initially released, [4] [ citation needed ] but five judges' identities were subsequently disclosed:

Jurisdiction

The tribunal has jurisdiction over any Iraqi national or resident accused of the following crimes:

These crimes must have been committed:

Rights of the accused

The rights of the accused are set out in the tribunal's statute and include the presumption of innocence, equality before the tribunal, a public trial without undue delay, appointing counsel of the defendant's own choosing, calling witnesses, and the right to remain silent.[ citation needed ]

Penalties

The tribunal must impose sentences in line with existing Iraqi law, which includes the death penalty. For crimes such as crimes against humanity which have no counterpart in Iraqi law, the statute says the trial chamber should take into consideration the gravity of the offense and sentences issued by international criminal tribunals.

Investigations

Dujail trial

From October 2005 to 5 November 2006, the tribunal tried eight people who were accused of crimes against humanity in a massacre of 148 Shiites in Dujail. The defendants included:

At Saddam Hussein's initial arraignment he was also accused of:

On 5 November 2006, Saddam Hussein was found guilty of all charges relating to the Dujail massacre and was sentenced to death by hanging. He received an automatic appeal. However, the appeal was rejected and the guilty sentence was upheld. It was ordered that he be executed within 30 days and he was executed by hanging on 30 December 2006.

Al-Anfal campaign

The Special Tribunal investigated the crimes of the al-Anfal campaign in 1988 and during the 1991 uprising. The judges issued arrest warrants against these persons for crimes against Kurds in 1988:

The judges also issued arrest warrants against these persons for crimes in 1991:

In June 2005 the judges investigated crimes carried out in 1990, ethnic crimes in the city of Kirkuk, and crimes against Faili Kurds, questioning these accused: [10]

In late June the judges had investigated Tariq Aziz concerning the events of 1991.

The judges also questioned these persons concerning the use of chemical weapons in the al-Anfal campaign: [11]

The judges questioned these persons on various events: [12]

On 24 June 2007, Ali Hassan al-Majid, Sultan Hashim Ahmed al-Tay, and Hussein Rashid Mohammed were sentenced to hang for their role in the al-Anfal campaign against the Kurds. Two other former regime officials, Saber Abd Al-Aziz Aldori and Farhan Mutlaq Saleh were sentenced to life in prison. All charges against former governor of Mosul Taher Tawfiq Al-ani were dropped because of insufficient evidence. [13]

Al-Majid would receive three more death sentences for other crimes: one for the 1991 suppression of a Shi'a uprising along with Abdul-Ghani Abdul Ghafur on 2 December 2008; [14] one for the 1999 crackdown in the assassination of Grand Ayatollah Mohammad al-Sadr on 2 March 2009; [15] and lastly on 17 January 2010 for the gassing of the Kurds in 1988. [16] Afterwards, he was hanged over a week later on 25 January. [17]

General Director

The tribunal was initially led by Salem Chalabi a former exile and relative of Ahmed Chalabi. Critics pointed to Salem's lack of experience and close ties to Iraqi dissidents, questioning US motives in his appointment. However, as his uncle Ahmed Chalabi fell from US favour in August 2004, warrants were issued for their arrest while they were both out of Iraq. Some saw this as an attempt to remove them from Iraqi politics. On 19 September 2004, The New York Times quoted Iraqi interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi as saying that he had received Salem's resignation. [18] Speculation immediately started on who would replace Salem; names mentioned include Taleb al-Zubaidi and Naim al-Oukaili. On 4 October 2004, the Iraqi National Council approved the nomination of Judge Ammar al-Bakri, who became the new Administrator of the Special Tribunal – but was ousted in turn. The nine Appellate Judges have selected an eminent Iraqi jurist as president, who is the tribunal's leader. Tribunal procedures are governed by the Rules of Procedure and Evidence and the Iraqi Criminal Procedural Code of 1971.

Controversies

Human Rights Watch's observed the Dujail trial and saw a number of serious shortcomings in how the Iraqi High Tribunal functioned. These include: 1) An almost complete lack of familiarity with international criminal law on the part of all Iraqi lawyers and judges involved in the trial; 2) Chaotic and inadequate administration which has given rise to major problems in performing basic administrative tasks necessary for a trial of this magnitude to run fairly; and 3) Such extensive use of anonymous witnesses that the defendants were deprived the right to contest the evidence against them.

— Human Rights Watch report on the flaws of Iraqi Special Tribunal, 22 June 2007 [19]

The Iraqi High Tribunal was widely criticized for its methodical defects and its political dependency on the Iraqi government. One of its controversial acts included the sacking of its presiding judge in September 2006 by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who perceived the judge as biased towards defendants. Human Rights Watch considered the Dujail and Anfal trials to be unfair and stated that many of the charges were "vague", concluding that the defendants were unable to bring their witnesses due to safety issues within Iraq. Video interactions from witnesses of the defendants were also denied by the court, thus hampering the defendants' ability to challenge the claims of the prosecutors. The trails were marked by absence of fundamental judicial proceedings, such as the murder of three defense lawyers and ample utilization of anonymous witnesses by the prosecution, whose claims could not be cross analyzed by the defendants. [20] [21] [22]

Both within and outside Iraq, the trials by the Special Tribunal were dubbed as a "show parade" designed to execute Saddam and deemed as illegitimate by numerous lawyers and human rights organizations. The tribunal itself was widely seen as a body that was influenced by the Bush administration since it was set by the Coalition Provisional Authority led by Paul Bremer, who himself directly reported to the US President. [23] Numerous international lawyers have criticized the United States for playing too great a role in the foundation, financing, and operation of the tribunal. [24] Richard Dicker, the director of International Justice Programme of Human Rights Watch, stated regarding the proceedings of Anfal trial:

"The court undercut the accused’s right to present a vigorous defense by allowing the prosecution to rely on vague charges and refusing requests to accommodate defense witnesses.. This includes refusing to hear testimony from defense witnesses abroad via videolink." [25]

International legal experts[ who? ] argued for Saddam to be tried outside the country as it was believed that he would not receive a fair trial under inexperienced judges who had been long standing enemies of him and his regime. Following the re-introduction of capital punishment in August 2004, the Iraqi interim prime minister, Iyad Allawi, gave assurances that he would not interfere with the trial and would accept any court decisions, although some of his comments are open to misinterpretation: "As for the execution, that is for the court to decide – so long as a decision is reached impartially and fairly." [26]

One of the judges, Ra’id Juhi, had indicted Moqtada al-Sadr for murder in April 2004, [27] which British journalist Robert Fisk said had precipitated the Iraq spring fighting of 2004. Fisk said that Juhi, a Shia Muslim then 33, had served as a judge under Saddam for a decade, then worked as a translator, and was appointed to the tribunal by Paul Bremer. [28]

The Iraqi Special Tribunal also contains[ clarification needed ] an official English translation of the Iraqi Criminal and Civil Code, which Paul Bremer decreed would be the operating legal code of Iraq until it is changed or modified by the Iraqi government.

One emerging, critical issue to the mission of the Iraqi High Tribunal is that of women's human rights. Women occupy a uniquely vulnerable position in conflict, and the Iraqi High Tribunal is charged with prosecuting gender-based crimes within the Hussein regime. Historically, rape has proven a prolific problem in conflict, and in many Mid-East countries, including Iraq, such phenomena as honor crimes (the killing of rape victims by male family members to restore honor to the family name) inhibited gender justice. The judges of the Iraqi High Tribunal have taken a pioneering interest in gender justice, requesting a training in fall of 2006 on international law tenets that protect women's human rights. [29] Attorney Janet Benshoof of the Global Justice Center was among the legal authorities stressing the importance of upholding women's rights in future Iraqi High Tribunal decisions. The judges proved very interested in protecting women's human rights in their future decisions, and have requested an amicus (friend of the court) brief from concerned attorneys and women's civil society organizations regarding future gender jurisprudence.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tariq Aziz</span> Iraqi politician (1936–2015)

Tariq Aziz was an Iraqi politician who served as Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Foreign Affairs and a close advisor of President Saddam Hussein. Their association began in the 1950s when both were activists for the then-banned Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. He was both an Arab nationalist and a member of the Chaldean Catholic Church.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Ba'athist Iraq</span> Human rights issues from 1979 to 2003

Iraq under the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party saw severe violations of human rights. Secret police, state terrorism, torture, mass murder, genocide, ethnic cleansing, rape, deportations, extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, assassinations, chemical warfare, and the destruction of the Mesopotamian marshes were some of the methods Saddam Hussein and the country's Ba'athist government used to maintain control. Saddam committed crimes of aggression during the Iran–Iraq War and the Gulf War, which violated the Charter of the United Nations. The total number of deaths and disappearances related to repression during this period is unknown, but is estimated to be at least 250,000 to 290,000 according to Human Rights Watch, with the great majority of those occurring as a result of the Anfal genocide in 1988 and the suppression of the uprisings in Iraq in 1991. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued regular reports of widespread imprisonment and torture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ali Hassan al-Majid</span> Iraqi politician and military commander (1941–2010)

Ali Hassan Majid al-Tikriti, nicknamed Chemical Ali, was an Iraqi politician and military commander under Saddam Hussein who served as defence minister, interior minister, and chief of the Iraqi Intelligence Service. He was also the governor of Kuwait during much of the 1990–91 Gulf War.

The Halabja massacre, also known as the Halabja chemical attack, was a massacre of Kurdish people that took place on 16 March 1988, during the Iraqi–Kurdish conflict in the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War in Halabja, Kurdistan, Iraq. The attack was part of the Al-Anfal Campaign in Kurdistan, as well as part of the Iraqi Army's attempt to repel the Iranian Operation Zafar 7. It took place 48 hours after the capture of the town by the Iranian Army. A United Nations (UN) medical investigation concluded that mustard gas was used in the attack, along with unidentified nerve agents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti</span> Iraqi Mukhabarat leader (1951–2007)

Barzan Ibrahim Hassan al-Tikriti, also known as Barazan Ibrahim al-Tikriti, Barasan Ibrahem Alhassen and Barzan Hassan, was one of three half-brothers of Saddam Hussein, and a leader of the Mukhabarat, the Iraqi intelligence service. Despite falling out of favour with Saddam at one time, he was believed to have been a close presidential adviser at the time of his capture by U.S. forces. On 15 January 2007, Barzan was hanged for crimes against humanity. He was decapitated by the hangman's rope after errors were made calculating his body weight and length of drop from the platform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anfal campaign</span> Operation targeting rural Kurdish civilians in 1988

The Anfal campaign was a counterinsurgency operation which was carried out by Ba'athist Iraq from February to September 1988 during the Iraqi–Kurdish conflict at the end of the Iran–Iraq War. The campaign targeted rural Kurds because its purpose was to eliminate Kurdish rebel groups and Arabize strategic parts of the Kirkuk Governorate. The Iraqis committed atrocities on the local Kurdish population, mostly civilians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abid Hamid Mahmud</span> Iraqi politician (1957–2012)

Lieutenant General Abid Al-Hamid Mahmud al-Tikriti was an Iraqi military officer and Saddam Hussein's personal secretary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trial of Saddam Hussein</span> 2005–2006 trial by the Iraqi Interim Government

The trial of Saddam Hussein was the trial of the deposed President of Iraq Saddam Hussein by the Iraqi Interim Government for crimes against humanity during his time in office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Awad Hamed al-Bandar</span> Iraqi chief judge during the presidency of Saddam Hussein

Awad Hamad al-Bandar (Arabic: عواد حمد البندر السعدون, romanized: ʿAwād Ḥamad al-Bandar al-Saʿdūn; was an Iraqi chief judge under Saddam Hussein's presidency. He was a member of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party and was the head of the Revolutionary Court which issued death sentences against 143 Dujail residents, in the aftermath of the failed assassination attempt on the president on 8 July 1982.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rizgar Mohammed Amin</span>

Rizgar Mohammed Amin is the former chief judge of the Iraqi Special Tribunal's Al-Dujail trial. He is the only judge whose name was revealed on the trial's opening on 19 October 2005, the names of the other four judges and all but two of his four colleagues faces not allowed to be shown during the televised portions of the trial.(Telegraph.co.uk – 12:30AM GMT 15 January 2006)

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rauf Rashid Abd al-Rahman</span> Kurdish Chief Judge

Rauf Rashid Abd al-Rahman is the replacement chief judge of the Al-Dujail trial of Saddam Hussein in 2006, when he sentenced Saddam and some of his top aides to death by hanging.

Capital punishment in Iraq is a legal penalty. It was commonly used by the government of Saddam Hussein, was temporarily halted after the US-led 2003 invasion of Iraq that deposed Hussein, and has since been reinstated. Executions are carried out by hanging.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Execution of Saddam Hussein</span> Overview of the execution of the former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein on 30 December 2006

The execution of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein took place on 30 December 2006. Saddam was sentenced to death by hanging, after being convicted of crimes against humanity by the Iraqi Special Tribunal for the Dujail massacre—the killing of 148 Iraqi Shi'ites in the town of Dujail—in 1982, in retaliation for an assassination attempt against him.

The Dujail massacre was a mass killing of Shia rebels by the Ba'athist Iraqi government on 8 July 1982 in Dujail, Iraq. The massacre was committed in retaliation to an earlier assassination attempt by the Shia Iranian supported Islamic Dawa Party against the then President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein. The town of Dujail had a large Shia population, with 75,000 residents at the time of the incident, and was a well-known stronghold of the Dawa Party. It is located approximately 53 km (33 mi) from the capital of Baghdad, in the Sunni-majority Saladin Governorate of Iraq.

The 1999 Shia uprising in Iraq or Second Sadr Uprising was a short period of unrest in Iraq in early 1999 following the killing of Muhammad al-Sadr by the then Ba'athist government of Iraq. The protests and ensuing violence were strongest in the heavily Shia neighborhoods of Baghdad, as well as southern majority Shiite cities such as Karbala, Nasiriyah, Kufa, Najaf, and Basra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hussein Rashid</span>

Hussein Rashid Mohammed al-Tikriti is a former Iraqi military commander, who formerly served as the General Secretary of the General Command of the Armed Forces of Iraq.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feyli (tribe)</span> Kurdish tribe in Iraq and Iran

Feylis, also known as Feyli Kurds, is a Kurdish tribe mainly from Baghdad and the borderlands between Iraq and Iran. They speak Feyli which is classified as a sub-dialect of Southern Kurdish, but is commonly mistaken as being identical with the separate Feyli dialect of Northern Luri. Linguist Ismaïl Kamandâr Fattah argues that the Kurdish Feyli dialect and other Southern Kurdish sub-dialects are 'interrelated and largely mutually intelligible.'

Reactions to the execution of Saddam Hussein were varied. Some strongly supported the execution, particularly those personally affected by Saddam's actions as leader. Some of these victims wished to see him brought to trial for his other actions, alleged to have resulted in a much greater number of deaths than those for which he was convicted. Some believed the execution would boost morale in Iraq, while others feared it would incite further violence. Many in the international community supported Saddam being brought to justice but objected in particular to the use of capital punishment. Saddam's supporters condemned the action as unjust.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nugra Salman</span> Former prison in Iraq

Nugra Salman , also known as Nugrat al-Salman or Nigrat Salman is a former prison facility near the village Salman in the desert of the Muthanna Governorate in Iraq. It has been constructed in 1930 during the Hashemite Monarchy and later also by the Governments of Abd al-Karim Qasim and Saddam Hussein.

References

  1. ↑ Scharf, Michael P. (1 May 2007). "The Iraqi High Tribunal A Viable Experiment in International Justice?". Journal of International Criminal Justice. 5 (2): 258–263. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqm011. ISSN   1478-1387.
  2. ↑ "Law of the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal" (PDF). Official Gazette of the Republic of Iraq. 18 October 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 March 2009. Retrieved 13 August 2008. Article 37, The Statute of the Iraqi Special Tribunal for Crimes Against Humanity, Law No. 1 of 2003, and the Rules of Procedure issued under Article 16 thereof shall be abolished with effect from the date of the coming into force of this Law
  3. ↑ Laughland, John A history of political trials: from Charles I to Saddam Hussein, p.242
  4. ↑ "MercuryNews.com | 07/02/2004 | for fledgling Iraqi tribunal, stakes high trying Saddam". Archived from the original on 12 October 2004. Retrieved 4 July 2004.
  5. ↑ "'New chairman' for Saddam trial". BBC News. 16 January 2006. Retrieved 24 May 2010.
  6. ↑ "New Saddam judge 'should resign'". BBC News. 18 January 2006. Retrieved 24 May 2010.
  7. ↑ "CNN.com – Judge on Saddam tribunal killed – Mar 2, 2005". CNN . Archived from the original on 13 May 2006. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
  8. ↑ "CPA-IRAQ.org: Homepage of The New Iraq – Information about the Iraqi Dinar". Cpa-iraqa.org. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  9. ↑ "Law of the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal",International Center for Transitional Justice
  10. ↑ "Iraqi Special Tribunal : Home". Archived from the original on 2 May 2006. Retrieved 23 October 2005.
  11. ↑ "Iraqispecialtribunal Business". Iraqispecialtribunal.org. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  12. ↑ "Iraqispecialtribunal Business". Iraqispecialtribunal.org. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  13. ↑ "Iraq's 'Chemical Ali' sentenced to death". Msnbc.msn.com. 24 June 2007. Archived from the original on 26 June 2007. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  14. ↑ Second death sentence for Iraq's 'Chemical Ali, MSNBC.com, 2 December 2008. Retrieved on 2 December 2008.
  15. ↑ Iraq's 'Chemical Ali' gets 3rd death sentence, Associated Press, 2 March 2009. Retrieved on 17 January 2010.
  16. ↑ 'Chemical Ali' gets a new death sentence, MSNBC.com, 17 January 2010. Retrieved on 17 January 2010.
  17. ↑ "Saddam Hussein's Henchman Chemical Ali Executed". The Daily Telegraph. London. 25 January 2010. Retrieved 25 January 2010.
  18. ↑ "Archived copy". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 28 May 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  19. ↑ "Q & A: The Anfal Trial". Human Rights Watch. 22 June 2007. Archived from the original on 1 October 2022.
  20. ↑ "Iraq: Dujail Judgment Marred by Serious Flaws". Human Rights Watch. 21 June 2007. Archived from the original on 23 March 2023.
  21. ↑ "Convictions in the Anfal Trial". Opinio Juris. 24 June 2007. Archived from the original on 14 August 2022.
  22. ↑ "Q & A: The Anfal Trial". Human Rights Watch. 22 June 2007. Archived from the original on 1 October 2022.
  23. ↑ Ashok, Abhinav (5 July 2020). "Iraq Under Saddam Hussein and His Flawed Trial". Legal Bites. Archived from the original on 11 June 2023.
  24. ↑ "Iraq – Saddam's Road to Hell – A journey into the killing fields". PBS. Frontline. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  25. ↑ "Iraq: Dujail Judgment Marred by Serious Flaws". Human Rights Watch. 21 June 2007. Archived from the original on 23 March 2023.
  26. ↑ "U.S. Airstrike on Fallujah House Kills 10". ABC News . Archived from the original on 20 August 2004. Retrieved 27 June 2013.
  27. ↑ "'Bush freed us from Saddam, but he didn't finish the job'". The Irish Times. 21 March 2013. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  28. ↑ Fisk, Robert (1 July 2004). "Confused? Shadow of his old self? Hardly" . The Independent. Archived from the original on 25 May 2022. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  29. ↑ "Iraq Report" (PDF). Global Justice Center. 5 March 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 September 2007. Retrieved 21 May 2007.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.