Survival of the Friendliest

Last updated
Survival of the Friendliest: Understanding Our Origins and Rediscovering Our Common Humanity
Survival of the Friendliest (Brian Hare and Vanessa Woods).png
US first edition cover
Author Brian Hare
Vanessa Woods
Cover artistAbbey Lossing (illustration)
Greg Mollica (design)
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Publisher Random House
Publication date
July 14, 2020
Media typePrint (hardcover)
Pages304
ISBN 978-0-399-59066-5
OCLC 1124903559
155.7
LC Class BF698.95 H37 2020

Survival of the Friendliest: Understanding Our Origins and Rediscovering Our Common Humanity [1] is a book by anthropologist Brian Hare and writer Vanessa Woods, first published in 2020, based on Hare's research hypothesis of human self-domestication. [2] The main thesis of the book is that late in human evolution Homo sapiens underwent a process of extreme selection for friendliness that led to the self-domestication syndrome, as seen in other animals. The self-domestication syndrome led to a series of cognitive changes that allowed modern humans to out compete other species of humans in the Pleistocene, including Neanderthals, and become the most successful mammal on the planet. Hare and Woods argue that self-domestication is an ongoing process that continues today.

Contents

Summary

There are many theories on why modern humans became so successful while other human species went extinct, which generally revolve around humans becoming more intelligent which led to improvements in weapons and technology. Hare and Woods argue that instead, humans underwent extreme selection for prosociality, and that cognitive changes occurred by accident.

Domestication syndrome

Domestication is a process of human-induced artificial selection that causes marked changes in an animal compared to their wild relatives. Collectively called the domestication syndrome, these changes include physiology (increases in serotonin, oxytocin), morphology (skull shape and size, tooth size, floppy ears, curly tails, star mutations), behavior (reproductive cycle, juvenile behavior), and social cognition (increase in cooperative communicative abilities). Different domesticated animals have different combinations of these changes. Until recently, it was poorly understood why different species of domesticated animals developed which traits. [3] [4] [5] However, one trait that all domesticated animals share is a reduction in aggression compared to their wild relatives.

Pioneering experiments where Siberian foxes were experimentally domesticated demonstrated that domestication is directly caused by intense selection against aggression. [6] Over 50 generations, breeding only the friendliest, non-aggressive foxes, whose fear towards humans was replaced by attraction, led to a cascade of the physiological, morphological, behavioral, and cognitive changes apparent in other domesticated animals. [7]

Self-domestication

The process of self-domestication is similar, but instead of humans actively selecting against aggression, natural selection favors the process instead. As an example, in our closest living relatives, bonobos, self domestication can occur entirely without human intervention. Compared to our other closest living relatives, chimpanzees, bonobos are much less aggressive, and have never been observed to kill their group members or attack neighboring groups. Recent work shows that the friendliest bonobo male is more reproductively successful than the most despotic chimpanzee. Thus natural selection could favor reduced aggression in bonobos, which would have led to the domestication syndrome. Indeed, compared to chimpanzees, bonobos have changes to their morphology, (reduced cranial size, canine dimorphism, and depigmentation of the lips and tail tufts), physiology (changes to serotonin receptors and testosterone response), behavior (more juvenilized socio sexual behavior and play) and social cognition (increase in cooperative abilities). [8]

Human self-domestication

If self domestication could occur in bonobos, then it may also be possible in our own species. Hare and Woods propose that natural selection favored increased in-group prosociality over aggression in late human evolution. As a by-product of this selection, humans are predicted to show traits of the domestication syndrome observed in other domestic animals, including early-emerging cooperative communicative abilities.

Drawing on comparative, developmental, fossil, and neurobiological evidence, Hare and Woods propose that late human evolution was dominated by selection for intragroup prosociality over aggression. As a result, modern humans possess traits consistent with the syndrome associated with domestication in other animals. Increases in cognition, particularly related to cooperative communicative abilities, occurred by accident.

Reception

Survival of the Friendliest was well covered in the press, [9] [10] [11] [12] but there were popular and academic critiques.

Carel Van Shaik wrote: 'A lack of empirical studies on evolutionary rates and variation thwarts meaningful comparison with domestication.' [13]

Legal scholar Cass Sunstein wrote: 'Hare and Woods make it plausible to think that an underlying propensity of Homo Sapiens—to divide the world into insiders and outsiders—is causing a great deal of contemporary turmoil. But the underlying mechanisms are numerous, and evolutionary explanations are hardly sufficient. In the United States, for example, party antagonisms are much greater now than they were forty years ago; Homo Sapiens has not changed much in that time', [14] although later in the review Sunstein conceded: 'Homo Sapiens triumphed because of our capacity to cooperate with one another. In a challenging time, that is an inspiring message—and it suggests, in the strongest possible terms, that this is a capacity to cultivate.' [14]

Conservative commenters such as Pat Gray have criticized 'their theory they are altering now to fit their sensibilities, and their cry closets'. [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human evolution</span> Evolutionary process leading to anatomically modern humans

Human evolution is the evolutionary process within the history of primates that led to the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of the hominid family that includes all the great apes. This process involved the gradual development of traits such as human bipedalism, dexterity, and complex language, as well as interbreeding with other hominins, indicating that human evolution was not linear but weblike. The study of the origins of humans, variously known by the terms anthropogeny, anthropogenesis, or anthropogony, involves several scientific disciplines, including physical and evolutionary anthropology, paleontology, and genetics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bonobo</span> Species of great ape

The bonobo, also historically called the pygmy chimpanzee, is an endangered great ape and one of the two species making up the genus Pan. While bonobos are, today, recognized as a distinct species in their own right, they were initially thought to be a subspecies of Pan troglodytes, due to the physical similarities between the two species. Taxonomically, members of the chimpanzee/bonobo subtribe Panina—composed entirely by the genus Pan—are collectively termed panins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early modern human</span> Old Stone Age Homo sapiens

Early modern human (EMH), or anatomically modern human (AMH), are terms used to distinguish Homo sapiens that are anatomically consistent with the range of phenotypes seen in contemporary humans, from extinct archaic human species. This distinction is useful especially for times and regions where anatomically modern and archaic humans co-existed, for example, in Paleolithic Europe. Among the oldest known remains of Homo sapiens are those found at the Omo-Kibish I archaeological site in south-western Ethiopia, dating to about 233,000 to 196,000 years ago, the Florisbad site in South Africa, dating to about 259,000 years ago, and the Jebel Irhoud site in Morocco, dated about 315,000 years ago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Domestication</span> Selective breeding of plants and animals to serve humans

Domestication is a multi-generational mutualistic relationship in which an animal species, such as humans or leafcutter ants, takes over control and care of another species, such as sheep or fungi, so as to obtain from them a steady supply of resources, such as meat, milk, or labor. The process is gradual and geographically diffuse, based on trial and error.

Dog intelligence or dog cognition is the process in dogs of acquiring information and conceptual skills, and storing them in memory, retrieving, combining and comparing them, and using them in new situations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Domesticated silver fox</span> Type of fox

The domesticated silver fox is a form of the silver fox that has been to some extent domesticated under laboratory conditions. The silver fox is a melanistic form of the wild red fox. Domesticated silver foxes are the result of an experiment designed to demonstrate the power of selective breeding to transform species, as described by Charles Darwin in On the Origin of Species. The experiment at the Institute of Cytology and Genetics in Novosibirsk, Russia explored whether selection for behaviour rather than morphology may have been the process that had produced dogs from wolves, by recording the changes in foxes when in each generation only the most tame foxes were allowed to breed. Many of the descendant foxes became both tamer and more dog-like in morphology, including displaying mottled- or spotted-coloured fur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Domestication of vertebrates</span>

The domestication of vertebrates is the mutual relationship between vertebrate animals including birds and mammals, and the humans who have influence on their care and reproduction.

The evolution of human intelligence is closely tied to the evolution of the human brain and to the origin of language. The timeline of human evolution spans approximately seven million years, from the separation of the genus Pan until the emergence of behavioral modernity by 50,000 years ago. The first three million years of this timeline concern Sahelanthropus, the following two million concern Australopithecus and the final two million span the history of the genus Homo in the Paleolithic era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Wrangham</span> British anthropologist and primatologist

Richard Walter Wrangham is an English anthropologist and primatologist; he is Professor of Biological Anthropology at Harvard University. His research and writing have involved ape behavior, human evolution, violence, and cooking.

The evolutionary psychology of religion is the study of religious belief using evolutionary psychology principles. It is one approach to the psychology of religion. As with all other organs and organ functions, the brain's functional structure is argued to have a genetic basis, and is therefore subject to the effects of natural selection and evolution. Evolutionary psychologists seek to understand cognitive processes, religion in this case, by understanding the survival and reproductive functions they might serve.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Self-domestication</span> Scientific hypothesis in ethnobiology

Self-domestication is a scientific hypothesis that suggests that, similar to domesticated animals, there has been a process of artificial selection among members of the human species conducted by humans themselves. In this way, during the process of hominization, a preference for individuals with collaborative and social behaviors would have been shown to optimize the benefit of the entire group: docility, language, and emotional intelligence would have been enhanced during this process of artificial selection. The hypothesis is raised that this is what differentiated Homo sapiens from Homo neanderthalensis and Homo erectus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in humans</span> Evolutionary effects of sexual selection on humans

Sexual selection in humans concerns the concept of sexual selection, introduced by Charles Darwin as an element of his theory of natural selection, as it affects humans. Sexual selection is a biological way one sex chooses a mate for the best reproductive success. Most compete with others of the same sex for the best mate to contribute their genome for future generations. This has shaped human evolution for many years, but reasons why humans choose their mates are not fully understood. Sexual selection is quite different in non-human animals than humans as they feel more of the evolutionary pressures to reproduce and can easily reject a mate. The role of sexual selection in human evolution has not been firmly established although neoteny has been cited as being caused by human sexual selection. It has been suggested that sexual selection played a part in the evolution of the anatomically modern human brain, i.e. the structures responsible for social intelligence underwent positive selection as a sexual ornamentation to be used in courtship rather than for survival itself, and that it has developed in ways outlined by Ronald Fisher in the Fisherian runaway model. Fisher also stated that the development of sexual selection was "more favourable" in humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hominidae</span> Family of primates

The Hominidae, whose members are known as the great apes or hominids, are a taxonomic family of primates that includes eight extant species in four genera: Pongo ; Gorilla ; Pan ; and Homo, of which only modern humans remain.

Muscular evolution in humans is an overview of the muscular adaptations made by humans from their early ancestors to the modern man. Humans are believed to be predisposed to develop muscle density as early humans depended on muscle structures to hunt and survive. Modern man's need for muscle is not as dire, but muscle development is still just as rapid if not faster due to new muscle building techniques and knowledge of the human body.

The evolution of schizophrenia refers to the theory of natural selection working in favor of selecting traits that are characteristic of the disorder. Positive symptoms are features that are not present in healthy individuals but appear as a result of the disease process. These include visual and/or auditory hallucinations, delusions, paranoia, and major thought disorders. Negative symptoms refer to features that are normally present but are reduced or absent as a result of the disease process, including social withdrawal, apathy, anhedonia, alogia, and behavioral perseveration. Cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia involve disturbances in executive functions, working memory impairment, and inability to sustain attention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neoteny in humans</span> Retention of juvenile traits into adulthood

Neoteny is the retention of juvenile traits well into adulthood. In humans, this trend is greatly amplified, especially when compared to non-human primates. Neotenic features of the head include the globular skull; thinness of skull bones; the reduction of the brow ridge; the large brain; the flattened and broadened face; the hairless face; hair on the head; larger eyes; ear shape; small nose; small teeth; and the small maxilla and mandible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Domestication syndrome</span> Proposed biological phenomenon

Domestication syndrome refers to two sets of phenotypic traits that are common to either domesticated plants or domesticated animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brian Hare</span> American anthropologist (born 1976)

Brian Hare is a professor of evolutionary anthropology at Duke University. He researches the evolution of cognition by studying both humans, our close relatives the primates, and species whose cognition converged with our own. He founded and co-directs the Duke Canine Cognition Center.

Wild ancestors are the original species from which domesticated plants and animals are derived. Examples include dogs which are derived from wolves and flax which is derived from Linum bienne. In most cases the wild ancestor species still exists, but some domesticated species, such as camels, have no surviving wild relatives. In many cases there is considerable debate in the scientific community about the identity of the wild ancestor or ancestors, as the process of domestication involves natural selection, artificial selection, and hybridization.

Sociodicy is the explanation and exploration of the fundamental goodness of human society. It seeks to provide an account for humans' general success in living together despite their propensity to selfishness, violence, and evil and despite the variation and difference seen across human populations.

References

  1. Hare, Brian, 1976- author. (14 July 2020). Survival of the friendliest : understanding our origins and rediscovering our common humanity. Random House Publishing. ISBN   978-0-399-59067-2. OCLC   1149345326.{{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  2. Hare, Brian (2017-01-03). "Survival of the Friendliest:Homo sapiensEvolved via Selection for Prosociality". Annual Review of Psychology. 68 (1): 155–186. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044201. ISSN   0066-4308. PMID   27732802. S2CID   3387266.
  3. Diamond, Jared (2002). "Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication". Nature. 418 (6898): 700–707. Bibcode:2002Natur.418..700D. doi: 10.1038/nature01019 . ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   12167878. S2CID   205209520.
  4. Hemmer, H. (1990-07-27). Domestication: The Decline of Environmental Appreciation. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-34178-3.
  5. Tchernov, Eitan; Horwitz, Liora Kolska (1991). "Body size diminution under domestication: Unconscious selection in primeval domesticates". Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 10 (1): 54–75. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(91)90021-o. ISSN   0278-4165.
  6. Trut, Lyudmila N. (1999). "Early Canid Domestication: The Farm-Fox Experiment: Foxes bred for tamability in a 40-year experiment exhibit remarkable transformations that suggest an interplay between behavioral genetics and development". American Scientist. 87 (2): 160–169. doi:10.1511/1999.2.160. ISSN   0003-0996. JSTOR   27857815.
  7. Hare, Brian; Plyusnina, Irene; Ignacio, Natalie; Schepina, Olesya; Stepika, Anna; Wrangham, Richard; Trut, Lyudmila (2005). "Social Cognitive Evolution in Captive Foxes Is a Correlated By-Product of Experimental Domestication". Current Biology. 15 (3): 226–230. Bibcode:2005CBio...15..226H. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040 . ISSN   0960-9822. PMID   15694305. S2CID   1592440.
  8. Hare, Brian; Wobber, Victoria; Wrangham, Richard (2012-03-01). "The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression". Animal Behaviour. 83 (3): 573–585. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.007. ISSN   0003-3472. S2CID   3415520.
  9. Why it actually might be 'survival of the friendliest', 30 September 2020, archived from the original on October 24, 2020, retrieved 2020-10-07
  10. Sloat, Sarah. "One advantageous way humans are more like dogs than Neanderthals". Inverse. Retrieved 2020-10-07.
  11. Cimons, Marlene. "'Friendliest,' not fittest, is key to evolutionary survival, scientists argue in book". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2020-10-07.
  12. "Why our understanding of 'Survival of the Fittest' is wrong". BBC Reel. Retrieved 2020-10-07.
  13. Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R.; Schaik, Carel P. van (2019). "Evaluating the self-domestication hypothesis of human evolution". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 28 (3): 133–143. doi:10.1002/evan.21777. ISSN   1520-6505. PMID   30938920. S2CID   91189857.
  14. 1 2 Sunstein, Cass R. (2020-05-29). "The triumph of the friendly: A review of Brian Hare and Vanessa Woods, survival of the friendliest". Journal of Bioeconomics. 22 (2): 131–135. doi:10.1007/s10818-020-09298-1. ISSN   1387-6996. S2CID   219763857.
  15. Gray, Pat (2020). "It is No Longer Survival of the Fittest. Now It's Survival of the Friendliest?". YouTube .