Swing Vote (1999 film)

Last updated

Swing Vote
Swing Vote (1999 film).jpg
VHS cover art
Genre Drama
Written by
Directed by David Anspaugh
Starring Andy Garcia
Music by Harry Gregson-Williams
Country of originUnited States
Original languageEnglish
Production
Executive producers
Producers
Cinematography Johnny E. Jensen
EditorChristopher Cibelli
Running time90 minutes
Production companies
Original release
Network ABC
ReleaseApril 19, 1999 (1999-04-19)

Swing Vote is a 1999 American television drama film directed by David Anspaugh, written by Ronald Bass and Jane Rusconi, and starring Andy Garcia. It features an alternative reality in which the Supreme Court of the United States has overturned the Roe v. Wade decision and the State of Alabama has subsequently charged a woman with first degree murder for having an abortion. It aired on ABC on April 19, 1999.

Contents

Story

In an alternative reality, the Supreme Court has voted to overturn Roe v Wade. Virginia Mape has been charged and convicted of first degree murder by the state of Alabama for procuring an abortion after that ruling, and her conviction has been appealed directly to the Supreme Court.

Joseph Kirkland, a corporate lawyer with no judicial experience, has recently been appointed to the Supreme Court and moved to Washington D.C. with his wife, anti-abortion activist Linda Kirland, and their daughter Jenny. With no time to settle in, Joseph meets his only clerk, Calley McFearson, before engaging in the court's first extraordinary session, hearing arguments on the appeal. In his first conference, Joseph unexpectedly finds himself catapulted into the hot seat. The Chief Justice explains that when he obtained the necessary votes to overturn Roe v Wade, his majority couldn't agree on the penalties for abortion and so left the rulemaking up to the states, which has led to what some consider to be a bad law from Alabama. Assuming he still has a majority, the Chief is shocked to find his numbers dwindling as Clore Cawley, Sara Brandwynne, Henry Banks and Will Dunn all vote to reverse the conviction. With only Daniel Morrisey, Benjamin Ripley and Eli MacCorckle voting to convict, Joseph is left as the swing vote, but refuses to confirm how he is leaning.

Over the next two nights Joseph begins his soul-searching. He allows Calley to convince him to attend a rally led by Virginia Mapes, seeing her in person and coming to the conclusion that she is a test case; the perfect candidate who could have had an abortion elsewhere, is well-educated and articulate, and has been hand-picked to challenge the law. As he meets with Arthur Jacklyn, a prominent anti-abortion activist who has been jailed previously, the Chief works on swaying the votes of the other justices; he brings Clore Cawley on side by promising to write an opinion attacking the Alabama law and forcing them to revoke it, and convinces Sara Brandwynne that if she joins his opinion he can cut the hardline Benjamin Ripley loose and let her draft a section on lenient sentencing.

At home, meanwhile, things get heated. Linda receives a call from Marley Terrell, Jenny's birth mother, who says she is coming to see them, something Joseph is extremely opposed to. In the end the couple reveal to Jenny that she is adopted, and Marley's visit is actually an opportunity for her to plead with Joseph not to allow abortion to become legal again as it would mean children like Jenny would be destroyed in the womb rather than put up for adoption.

Visiting retired and ailing Justice Harlan Greene, who he has replaced, Joseph asks for his help in ironing out the thoughts he has been working with and getting him to the necessary number of votes to command a majority. Harlan's response is simply: "you get me to four votes. I'll get you to five." Later, Daniel Morrissey visits Justice Greene and is convinced to swing his vote to Joseph. The Chief, made aware of Joseph's thinking by Eli MacCorckle, tries to convince him not to go for five votes.

After a climatic argument with Will Dunn, who cannot bring himself to join the majority Joseph is cobbling together, the court reconvenes to pass its judgement. In a surprise to the court, the judgement is delivered by Joseph himself. He announces that abortion will once again be legal at up to 26 weeks, after which the court imposes a coherent package of stringent conditions to limit, but not outlaw, the procedure. Joseph goes one step further and places adoption on the agenda, pointing out that the country is going through a massive adoption crisis and that neither pro-choice nor anti-abortion candidates seem to be "pro-child" in that regard. He confirms the majority opinion of himself, Will Dunn, Sara Brandwynne, Hank Banks and Daniel Morrissey. The court is further shocked when, throwing all precedent out of the window, Justices Eli MacCorckle and Clore Cawley switch their votes after the judgement is announced, giving Joseph a majority of 7.

The film closes as Benjamin Ripley, one of two dissenting voices, begins delivering his oral dissent.

Cast

Production

Filming took place in Los Angeles. [1]

Critical reception

Swing Vote received mixed reviews, with critics praising the cast but criticizing the script as lacking credible dialogue and featuring overly convenient plot points. [2] Ray Richmond of Variety said the teleplay by Ron Bass and Jane Rusconi "is literate, sensitively wrought and painstakingly balanced; the problem is that practically everything that exits someone's lips sounds like a speech". [1] He noted "both sides of the abortion mess are likely to be unsatisfied by 'Swing Vote,' but possibly this displeasure actually speaks to the film's profound lack of bias". [1]

Alan Pergament of The Buffalo News wrote: "The Supreme Court conferences are filled with political games, smart humor and some surprising personal revelations that brand this talkative movie as serious-minded and make it interesting. But the movie breaks down when Kirkland visits a variety of places -- from his home and the defendant's home to a pro-choice rally (in a Yankees cap yet) to a hospital -- to sort out his feelings about abortion, adoption and what freedom means." [3]

Scott D. Pierce of the Deseret News praised the film for offering intelligent arguments on both sides of the abortion debate, adding "and...while there are obviously disagreements, no one is mocked or belittled for their beliefs -- from the most liberal to the most conservative characters. That, in and of itself, is nothing short of remarkable." [4]

Related Research Articles

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States generally protected a right to have an abortion. The decision struck down many abortion laws, and caused an ongoing abortion debate in the United States about whether, or to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, and what the role of moral and religious views in the political sphere should be. The decision also shaped debate concerning which methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugo Black</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1937 to 1971

Hugo Lafayette Black was an American lawyer, politician, and jurist who served as a U.S. Senator from Alabama from 1927 to 1937 and as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1937 to 1971. A member of the Democratic Party and a devoted New Dealer, Black endorsed Franklin D. Roosevelt in both the 1932 and 1936 presidential elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harlan F. Stone</span> Chief justice of the United States from 1941 to 1946

Harlan Fiske Stone was an American attorney and jurist who served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1925 to 1941 and then as the 12th chief justice of the United States from 1941 until his death in 1946. He also served as the U.S. Attorney General from 1924 to 1925 under President Calvin Coolidge, with whom he had attended Amherst College as a young man. His most famous dictum was: "Courts are not the only agency of government that must be assumed to have capacity to govern."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Marshall Harlan II</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1955 to 1971

John Marshall Harlan was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1955 to 1971. Harlan is usually called John Marshall Harlan II to distinguish him from his grandfather, John Marshall Harlan, who served on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1877 to 1911.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Burnham Woods</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1881 to 1887

William Burnham Woods was an American jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. An appointee of President Rutherford B. Hayes, he served from 1881 until 1887. He wrote the majority opinion in United States v. Harris, involving the constitutionality of the Ku Klux Klan Act, and Presser v. Illinois, involving the application of the Second Amendment to the states; both cases adopted a narrow interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. He dissented rarely and wrote mostly uncontroversial opinions, and he has been largely forgotten by history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Alito</span> US Supreme Court justice since 2006 (born 1950)

Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. is an American jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated to the high court by President George W. Bush on October 31, 2005, and has served on it since January 31, 2006. After Antonin Scalia, Alito is the second Italian American justice to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Roberts</span> Chief Justice of the United States since 2005

John Glover Roberts Jr. is an American jurist who has served as the 17th chief justice of the United States since 2005. He has been described as having a moderate conservative judicial philosophy, though he is primarily an institutionalist. For his willingness to work with the Supreme Court's liberal bloc, Roberts has been regarded as a swing vote on the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wisconsin Supreme Court</span> Highest court in the U.S. state of Wisconsin

The Wisconsin Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in Wisconsin. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over original actions, appeals from lower courts, and regulation or administration of the practice of law in Wisconsin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Roberts Supreme Court nominations</span> United States Supreme Court nomination

In July 2005, President George W. Bush nominated John Roberts to succeed retiring Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. However, following the death of Chief Justice of the United States William Rehnquist, that still-pending nomination was withdrawn. On September 5, 2005, President Bush announced that he would nominate Roberts to succeed Rehnquist as Chief Justice instead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The switch in time that saved nine</span> 1937 power shift in the United States Supreme Court

In U.S. Supreme Court history, "The switch in time that saved nine" is the phrase—originally a quip by humorist Cal Tinney—about what was perceived in 1937 as the sudden jurisprudential shift by associate justice Owen Roberts in the 1937 case West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish. Conventional historical accounts portrayed the Court's majority opinion as a strategic political move to protect the Court's integrity and independence from President Franklin Roosevelt's court-reform bill, but later historical evidence gives weight to Roberts' decision being made immediately after oral arguments, much earlier than the bill's introduction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States is the only court specifically established by the Constitution of the United States, implemented in 1789; under the Judiciary Act of 1789, the Court was to be composed of six members—though the number of justices has been nine for most of its history, this number is set by Congress, not the Constitution. The court convened for the first time on February 2, 1790.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roberts Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court since 2005

The Roberts Court is the time since 2005 during which the Supreme Court of the United States has been led by John Roberts as Chief Justice. Roberts succeeded William Rehnquist as Chief Justice after Rehnquist's death.

Hawker v. New York, 170 U.S. 189 (1898), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a New York state law preventing convicted felons from practicing medicine, even when the felony conviction occurred before the law was enacted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Rehnquist</span> Chief Justice of the United States from 1986 to 2005

William Hubbs Rehnquist was an American attorney and jurist who served on the U.S. Supreme Court for 33 years. Rehnquist was an associate justice from 1972 to 1986 and the 16th chief justice from 1986 until his death in 2005. Considered a staunch conservative, Rehnquist favored a conception of federalism that emphasized the Tenth Amendment's reservation of powers to the states. Under this view of federalism, the Court, for the first time since the 1930s, struck down an act of Congress as exceeding its power under the Commerce Clause.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthony Kennedy</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1988 to 2018

Anthony McLeod Kennedy is an American attorney and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1988 until his retirement in 2018. He was nominated to the court in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan, and sworn in on February 18, 1988. After the retirement of Sandra Day O'Connor in 2006, he was considered the swing vote on many of the Roberts Court's 5–4 decisions.

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities. Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by statute, court ruling, or voter initiative in thirty-six states, the District of Columbia, and Guam.

Brian Keith Hagedorn is an American lawyer and a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, serving since 2019. Prior to his election to the supreme court, he served four years as a judge on the Wisconsin Court of Appeals.

Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 582 (2016), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court announced on June 27, 2016. The Court ruled 5–3 that Texas cannot place restrictions on the delivery of abortion services that create an undue burden for women seeking an abortion. On June 28, 2016, the Supreme Court refused to hear challenges from Wisconsin and Mississippi where federal appeals courts had enjoined the enforcement of similar laws.

June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a Louisiana state law placing hospital-admission requirements on abortion clinics doctors was unconstitutional. The law mirrored a Texas state law that the Court found unconstitutional in 2016 in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (WWH).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court nomination</span> United States Supreme Court nomination

On February 25, 2022, President Joe Biden announced that he would nominate Ketanji Brown Jackson to the position of associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to fill the vacancy by Stephen Breyer, who announced his retirement on January 27, 2022, at the age of 83. Jackson, a former law clerk of Breyer, was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, having been appointed by Biden in 2021. Jackson is the first Black woman in U.S. history to be nominated to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Richmond, Ray (April 19, 1999). "Swing Vote". Variety . Retrieved December 6, 2021.
  2. "Abortion is battle ground for dramatic 'Swing Vote'". The Standard-Times . April 19, 1999. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
  3. Pergament, Alan (April 14, 1999). "A Pale Drama of the Abortion Debate". The Buffalo News . Retrieved January 2, 2024.
  4. Pierce, Scott D. (April 18, 1999). "There's a split decision on ABC's 'Swing Vote' Intelligent but flawed movie has great intentions". Deseret News . Retrieved January 2, 2024.