Related Research Articles
An attorney at law in the United States is a practitioner in a court of law who is legally qualified to prosecute and defend actions in court on the retainer of clients. As of April 2011,there were 1,225,452 licensed attorneys in the United States. A 2012 survey conducted by LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell determined 58 million consumers in the U.S. sought an attorney in the last year and that 76 percent of consumers used the Internet to search for an attorney.
Patent infringement is the commission of a prohibited act with respect to a patented invention without permission from the patent holder. Permission may typically be granted in the form of a license. The definition of patent infringement may vary by jurisdiction,but it typically includes using or selling the patented invention. In many countries,a use is required to be commercial to constitute patent infringement.
In international law and business,patent trolling or patent hoarding is a categorical or pejorative term applied to a person or company that attempts to enforce patent rights against accused infringers far beyond the patent's actual value or contribution to the prior art,often through hardball legal tactics. Patent trolls often do not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question. However,some entities,which do not practice their asserted patent,may not be considered "patent trolls",when they license their patented technologies on reasonable terms in advance.
Attorney's fee is a chiefly United States term for compensation for legal services performed by an attorney for a client,in or out of court. It may be an hourly,flat-rate or contingent fee. Recent studies suggest that when lawyers charge a flat-fee rather than billing by the hour,they work less hard on behalf of clients and clients get worse outcomes. Attorney fees are separate from fines,compensatory and punitive damages,and from court costs in a legal case. Under the "American rule",attorney fees are usually not paid by the losing party to the winning party in a case,except pursuant to specific statutory or contractual rights.
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas is a federal court in the Fifth Circuit.
In the field of law and economics,the English rule is a rule controlling assessment of lawyers' fees arising out of litigation. The English rule provides that the party that loses in court pays the other party's legal costs. The English rule contrasts with the American rule,under which each party is generally responsible for paying its own attorney fees. The English rule can make it easier for a poor person to bring suit,but by the same token it gives everyone more risk of being sued.
eBay Inc. v. MercExchange,L.L.C.,547 U.S. 388 (2006),is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously determined that an injunction should not be automatically issued based on a finding of patent infringement,but also that an injunction should not be denied simply on the basis that the plaintiff does not practice the patented invention. Instead,a federal court must still weigh what the Court described as the four-factor test traditionally used to determine if an injunction should be issued.
Tort reform consists of changes in the civil justice system in common law countries that aim to reduce the ability of plaintiffs to bring tort litigation or to reduce damages they can receive. Such changes are generally justified under the grounds that litigation is an inefficient means to compensate plaintiffs;that tort law permits frivolous or otherwise undesirable litigation to crowd the court system;or that the fear of litigation can serve to curtail innovation,raise the cost of consumer goods or insurance premiums for suppliers of services,and increase legal costs for businesses. Tort reform has primarily been prominent in common law jurisdictions,where criticism of judge-made rules regarding tort actions manifests in calls for statutory reform by the legislature.
Theodore H. Frank is an American lawyer,activist,and legal writer based in Washington,D.C. He is the counsel of record and petitioner in Frank v. Gaos,the first Supreme Court case to deal with the issue of cy pres in class action settlements;he is one of the few Supreme Court attorneys ever to argue his own case. He wrote the vetting report of vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin for the John McCain campaign in the 2008 presidential election. He founded the Center for Class Action Fairness (CCAF) in 2009;it temporarily merged with the Competitive Enterprise Institute in 2015,but as of 2019 CCAF is now part of the new Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute,a free-market nonprofit public-interest law firm founded by Frank and his CCAF colleague Melissa Holyoak.
Richard "Rick" G. Frenkel was an in-house intellectual property counsel and director of intellectual property at Cisco Systems. He was once the anonymous author of the Patent Troll Tracker blog,focusing on the subject of "patent trolls" and "a must-read blog among top intellectual property litigators".
Denise Louise Cote is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Leonard E. Davis is an American lawyer and former judge. He served as Chief Justice of the Twelfth Court of Appeals of Texas,from 2000-2002,and was nominated by George W. Bush on January 23,2002 to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas until his retirement May 15th,2015.
Morgan Chu,is an American intellectual property attorney.
McKool Smith is a U.S. trial firm with more than 130 trial lawyers across seven offices in Austin,Dallas,Houston,Los Angeles,Marshall,New York City,and Washington,DC. The firm represents clients in disputes involving commercial litigation,intellectual property (IP),bankruptcy,and white collar defense matters.
A copyright troll is a party that enforces copyrights it owns for purposes of making money through strategic litigation,in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic,sometimes without producing or licensing the works it owns for paid distribution. Critics object to the activity because they believe it does not encourage the production of creative works,but instead makes money through the inequities and unintended consequences of high statutory damages provisions in copyright laws intended to encourage creation of such works.
James Rodney Gilstrap is the Chief United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He is notable for presiding over more than one quarter of all patent infringement cases filed in the nation and is often referred to by various sources as the country's single "busiest patent judge."
Prenda Law,also known as Steele | Hansmeier PLLP and Anti-Piracy Law Group,was a Chicago-based law firm that ostensibly operated by undertaking litigation against copyright infringement. However,it was later characterized by the United States District Court for Central California in a May 2013 ruling as a "porno-trolling collective" whose business model "relie[d] on deception",and which resembled most closely a conspiracy and racketeering enterprise,referring in the judgment to RICO,the U.S. Federal anti-racketeering law. The firm ostensibly dissolved itself in July 2013 shortly after the adverse ruling although onlookers described Alpha Law Firm LLC as its apparent replacement. In 2014,the ABA Journal described the "Prenda Law saga" as having entered "legal folklore".
Thomas M. Melsheimer is a trial lawyer and a partner at the international law firm of Winston &Strawn,where he also serves as managing partner of its Dallas office and a member of the firm’s Executive Committee. His trial experience encompasses both civil and criminal litigation. On the civil side,he has tried to verdict cases involving patent infringement,trade secrets,insider trading,antitrust,breach of fiduciary duty,fraud,product liability,and False Claims Act (FCA) violations. On the criminal side,he has tried to verdict cases involving bank fraud,public corruption,copyright infringement,aggravated sexual assault,and kidnapping. His clients include a variety of high-net-worth individuals and notable corporations,including the Dallas Mavericks and owner Mark Cuban,Microsoft,Bank of America,and Texas Instruments. Melsheimer is the co-author of a best-selling book on trial advocacy,On the Jury Trial:Principles and Practices for Effective Advocacy
Roy Steven Payne is currently a U.S. magistrate judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He previously served as a U.S. magistrate judge in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana from 1987 to 2005.
TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC,581 U.S. ___ (2017),was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the venue in patent infringement lawsuits.
References
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Creswell, Julie (2006-09-24). "So Small a Town, So Many Patent Suits". The New York Times . Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- ↑ Nazer, Daniel and Vera Rainieri. Why Do Patent Trolls Go to Texas? It's Not for the BBQ. Electronic Frontier Foundation, July 9, 2014. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/07/why-do-patent-trolls-go-texas-its-not-bbq
- ↑ When Patents Attack! July 22, 2011. http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/441/when-patents-attack
- ↑ "Ward, T. John - Federal Judicial Center". www.fjc.gov.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Baldas, Tresa (2004-12-28). "Texas IP Rocket Docket Headed for Burnout?". The National Law Journal. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Williams, Sam (2006-02-03). "A Haven for Patent Pirates". Technology Review. MIT . Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- 1 2 "East Texas Judge Selected As 2004 Baylor Lawyer Of The Year". 2006-03-14. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- 1 2 3 4 McKenna, Barrie (2006-05-05). "Venue shopping? See you in Marshall". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2016-07-27.
- 1 2 3 4 Pusey, Allen (2006-03-26). "Business". The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Decker, Susan (2006-05-01). "Texas district is heaven for patent holders under siege". The Seattle Times. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- ↑ Nazer, Daniel. Deep Dive: Why We Need Venue Reform to Restore Fairness to Patent Litigation. Electronic Frontier Foundation. August 17, 2015. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/08/deep-dive-why-we-need-venue-reform-restore-fairness-patent-litigation
- 1 2 Masnick, Mike (2006-02-03). "Why Patent Trolls Worldwide Love Marshall, Texas". Techdirt. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- 1 2 3 Miller, Julie (2006-06-28). "Small Town Attracts High Stakes IP Case". Inside Counsel. Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- ↑ Lattman, Peter (2006-03-27). "Patent Trolls: Grazing the Piney Woods?". Law Blog. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2007-06-12.
- ↑ Massey, Michelle (2008-03-13). "Patent troll tracker sued for defamation". Southeast Texas Record. Southeast Texas Record. Archived from the original on 2008-05-07. Retrieved 2008-03-16.
- ↑ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6567002/
around 00:59:20 time mark
