Terrorism Acts

Last updated

From 2000 to 2015, the British Parliament passed a series of Terrorism Acts that were aimed at terrorism in general, rather than specifically focused on terrorism related to Northern Ireland.

Contents

Between them, they provided a definition of terrorism that made it possible to establish a new and distinct set of police powers and procedures, beyond those related to ordinary crime, which could be applied in terrorist cases.

List of legislation

The Terrorism Act 2000 (text)
  • gave a broad definition of terrorism for the first time
  • provided for an extended list of proscribed terrorist organisations beyond those associated with Northern Ireland.
  • allowed police to detain terrorist suspects for questioning for up to 7 days.
  • allowed police to stop and search any person or vehicle in designated areas without the need to suspect that person
The Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (text)
  • passed in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks
  • contained measures that had been rejected from the 2000 Act.
  • allowed Ministry of Defence Police to operate outside of military bases even for non-terrorist cases. [1] [2]
  • Part 4 enabled foreigners to be detained as terrorist suspects indefinitely.
  • required annual renewal of some provisions in recognition of the political climate
The Criminal Justice Act 2003 (text)
  • doubled the period of detention of a terrorist suspect for questioning to 14 days. [3]
  • justified by the claim that forensic analysis of chemical weapons materials might not be complete in 7 days. [4]
The Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (Continuance in force of sections 21 to 23) Order 2003 [5]
  • renewed Part 4 of the 2001 Act.
  • voted on specifically by Parliament due to its controversial nature. [6]
The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (text)
  • established the "control order" which is a form of house arrest
  • was subject to extended Parliamentary dispute which lasted for over 50 hours
  • passed just in time to be applied to the Part 4 terrorist suspects
The Terrorism Act 2006 (text)
  • drafted in the aftermath of the 7 July 2005 London bombings
  • defines the offence of "glorifying" terrorism
  • revises the period of detention of terrorist suspect without charge up to 28 days
    • the government had asked for this to be 90 days, but was defeated in a vote [7]
  • justified by the claim that necessary evidence to decide charges might be encrypted on one of thousands of hard disks, and it could take this long to search them. [8]
The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (text)
The Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 (text)
  • allows police questioning of suspects after they have been charged
  • requires convicted terrorist to notify the police of their whereabouts (similar to existing requirements for sex offenders)
  • extends extra-territorial jurisdiction of courts over terrorism offences overseas
  • defeat of government attempt to extend period of detention without charge to 42 days
  • originally interpreted as banning all photographs of the police in public places
The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (text)
  • extends sentencing provisions in Criminal Justice Act 2003 to terrorism offences [9]
The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2009 (text)
  • gives effect to Resolution 1373 of the United Nations Security Council (2001)
  • allows the Treasury to freeze the assets of suspected terrorists
  • replaces the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006
  • criticised by the Supreme Court in 2010
The Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Temporary Provisions) Act 2010 (text)
  • passed in response to the Supreme Court's ruling that the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 was void
  • retrospectively legitimises the 2006 Order to give Parliament time to enact new legislation
  • expires on 31 December 2010
The Justice and Security Act 2013 (text)
The Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 (text)
The Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019 (text)

Response

In February 2009, the Liberal Democrats published a Freedom Bill designed to repeal many of these laws (as well as others such as the Identity Cards Act 2006) aimed at reversing the "cumulative loss" of civil liberties in Britain. [10]

In his comprehensive commentary on the anti-terrorism legislation, Professor Clive Walker of the University of Leeds comments:

The Terrorism Act 2000 represents a worthwhile attempt to fulfil the role of a modern code against terrorism, though it fails to meet the desired standards in all respects. There are aspects where rights are probably breached, and its mechanisms to ensure democratic accountability and constitutionalism are even more deficient, as discussed in the section on "Scrutiny" earlier in this chapter. It is also a sobering thought, proffered by the Home Affairs Committee, that the result is that "This country has more anti-terrorist legislation on its statute books than almost any other developed democracy." (Report on the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill 2001 (2001-02 HC 351) para.1). But at least that result initially flowed from a solemnly studied and carefully constructed legislative exercise. [11]

Since the 1970s, an Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation has reviewed the operation of the UK's principal anti-terrorism laws, reporting to the Home Secretary and to Parliament.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patriot Act</span> 2001 United States anti-terrorism law

The USA PATRIOT Act was a landmark Act of the United States Congress, signed into law by President George W. Bush. The formal name of the statute is the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, and the commonly used short name is a contrived acronym that is embedded in the name set forth in the statute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Counterterrorism</span> Activity to defend against or prevent terrorist actions

Counterterrorism, also known as anti-terrorism, relates to the practices, military tactics, techniques, and strategies that governments, law enforcement, businesses, and intelligence agencies use to combat or eliminate terrorism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrorism Act 2000</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Terrorism Act 2000 is the first of a number of general Terrorism Acts passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It superseded and repealed the Prevention of Terrorism Act 1989 and the Northern Ireland Act 1996. It also replaced parts of the Criminal Justice Act 1998. The powers it provides the police have been controversial, leading to noted cases of alleged abuse, and to legal challenges in British and European courts. The stop-and-search powers under section 44 of the Act have been ruled illegal by the European Court of Human Rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom, formally introduced into Parliament on 19 November 2001, two months after the terrorist attacks in the United States on 11 September. It received royal assent and came into force on 14 December 2001. Many of its measures are not specifically related to terrorism, and a Parliamentary committee was critical of the swift timetable for such a long bill including non-emergency measures.

Three anti-terrorism bills were enacted in the Australian Parliament in 2004 by the Howard Coalition government with the support of the Labor Opposition. These were the Anti-terrorism Bill 2004, the Anti-terrorism Bill 2004 and the Anti-terrorism Bill 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, intended to deal with the Law Lords' ruling of 16 December 2004 that the detention without trial of eight foreigners at HM Prison Belmarsh under Part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was unlawful, being incompatible with European human rights laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Special Criminal Court</span> Irish specialist court

The Special Criminal Court is a juryless criminal court in Ireland which tries terrorism and serious organised crime cases.

Preventive detention is an imprisonment that is putatively justified for non-punitive purposes, most often to prevent further criminal acts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Terrorism Act 2005</span> Counter-terrorism Act of the Parliament of Australia in 2005

The Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 (Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia, which is intended to hamper the activities of any potential terrorists in the country. The counter-terrorism law was passed on 6 December 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrorism Act 2006</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Terrorism Act 2006 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that received royal assent on 30 March 2006, after being introduced on 12 October 2005. The Act creates new offences related to terrorism, and amends existing ones. The Act was drafted in the aftermath of the 7 July 2005 London bombings, and some of its terms have proven to be highly controversial. The government considered the act a necessary response to an unparalleled terrorist threat; it has encountered opposition from those who feel that it is an undue imposition on civil liberties, and could increase the terrorism risk.

<i>Anti-Terrorism Act</i> (Canada) Canadian law extending security measures to combat terrorism

The Anti-terrorism Act is an Act passed by the Parliament of Canada in response to the September 11, 2001, attacks in the United States. It received Royal Assent on December 18, 2001, as Bill C-36. The "omnibus bill" extended the powers of government and institutions within the Canadian security establishment to respond to the threat of terrorism.

Anti-terrorism legislation are laws with the purpose of fighting terrorism. They usually, if not always, follow specific bombings or assassinations. Anti-terrorism legislation usually includes specific amendments allowing the state to bypass its own legislation when fighting terrorism-related crimes, under alleged grounds of necessity.

Administrative detention is arrest and detention of individuals by the state without trial. A number of jurisdictions claim that it is done for security reasons. Many countries claim to use administrative detention as a means to combat terrorism or rebellion, to control illegal immigration, or to otherwise protect the ruling regime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Act 1946</span> United Kingdom legislation

The United Nations Act 1946 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which enables His Majesty's Government to implement resolutions under Article 41 of the United Nations Charter as Orders in Council. Thus Parliament delegated the power to enact such resolutions without the approval of Parliament. However, the prospective Order must be laid before either Parliament or the Scottish Parliament. A similar mechanism was later used in the European Communities Act 1972 and the Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Act 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human Security Act</span> Philippine law

The Human Security Act of 2007, officially designated as Republic Act No. 9372, was a Philippine law that took effect on July 20, 2007. The law, which was watered-down after opposition from some politicians and rights groups feared the legislation would endanger human rights, was aimed at tackling militants, particularly the Abu Sayyaf, in the southern Philippines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Counter-Terrorism Act 2008</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which increased police powers for the stated purpose of countering terrorism. The first reading of the bill was held in January 2008, and it received royal assent on 26 November 2008 following an episode of Parliamentary ping-pong on some of its most controversial issues.

Civil liberties in the United Kingdom are part of UK constitutional law and have a long and formative history. This is usually considered to have begun with Magna Carta of 1215, a landmark document in British constitutional history. Development of civil liberties advanced in common law and statute law in the 17th and 18th centuries, notably with the Bill of Rights 1689. During the 19th century, working-class people struggled to win the right to vote and join trade unions. Parliament responded with new legislation beginning with the Reform Act 1832. Attitudes towards suffrage and liberties progressed further in the aftermath of the first and second world wars. Since then, the United Kingdom's relationship to civil liberties has been mediated through its membership of the European Convention on Human Rights. The United Kingdom, through Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe, led the drafting of the Convention, which expresses a traditional civil libertarian theory. It became directly applicable in UK law with the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998.

Indefinite detention is the incarceration of an arrested person by a national government or law enforcement agency for an indefinite amount of time without a trial. The Human Rights Watch considers this practice as violating national and international laws, particularly human rights laws, although it remains in legislation in various liberal democracies.

The powers of the police in England and Wales are defined largely by statute law, with the main sources of power being the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and the Police Act 1996. This article covers the powers of police officers of territorial police forces only, but a police officer in one of the UK's special police forces can utilise extended jurisdiction powers outside of their normal jurisdiction in certain defined situations as set out in statute. In law, police powers are given to constables. All police officers in England and Wales are "constables" in law whatever their rank. Certain police powers are also available to a limited extent to police community support officers and other non warranted positions such as police civilian investigators or designated detention officers employed by some police forces even though they are not constables.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012</span>

The Security Offences Act 2012 is a controversial law supposedly "to provide for special measures relating to security offences for the purpose of maintaining public order and security and for connected matters". The Act is to replace the 1960 Internal Security Act (Malaysia). The Act was introduced by Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, approved in Parliament on 17 April 2012, given the Royal Assent on 18 June 2012 and Gazetted on 22 June 2012.

References

  1. "Section 98, Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001".
  2. Public Whip. "Vote on this amendment".
  3. "Section 306, Criminal Justice Act 2003".
  4. TheyWorkForYou (20 May 2003). "Debate on Criminal Justice Bill".
  5. "Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (Continuance in force of sections 21 to 23) Order 2003".
  6. Public Whip. "Vote on this Order".
  7. Public Whip. "Vote on 90 days amendment".
  8. TheyWorkForYou (9 November 2005). "Debate on Terrorism Bill".
  9. Coroners and Justice Act 2009, sections 138-139
  10. Mulholland, Hélène; Stratton, Allegra (26 February 2009). "Lib Dems pledge to axe 20 laws that attack civil liberties". The Guardian . London: Guardian News & Media Limited . Retrieved 25 May 2010.
  11. Walker, Clive (25 July 2002). The Anti-Terrorism Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-1-84174-183-3. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007.