Thiosulfate dehydrogenase

Last updated
Thiosulfate dehydrogenase
Thiosulfate Dehydrogenase Structure.png
3D structure of thiosulfate dehydrogenase with thiosulfate substrate present in the active site, corresponding to RCSB code 4V2K
Identifiers
EC no. 1.8.2.2
CAS no. 9076-88-4
Databases
IntEnz IntEnz view
BRENDA BRENDA entry
ExPASy NiceZyme view
KEGG KEGG entry
MetaCyc metabolic pathway
PRIAM profile
PDB structures RCSB PDB PDBe PDBsum
Gene Ontology AmiGO / QuickGO
Search
PMC articles
PubMed articles
NCBI proteins

Thiosulfate dehydrogenase (abbreviated as TsdA) (EC 1.8.2.2) is an enzyme that catalyzes the chemical reaction: [1]

Contents

2 thiosulfate + 2 ferricytochrome c tetrathionate + 2 ferrocytochrome c

Thus, the two substrates of this enzyme are thiosulfate and ferricytochrome c, whereas its two products are tetrathionate and ferrocytochrome c.

Thiosulfate dehydrogenase homologues have been isolated from numerous bacterial species and differ slightly in structure but have analogous function and mechanism of sulfur oxidation. The enzyme is similar in both function and structure to a few enzymes in the Sox sulfur oxidation pathway. [2]

Nomenclature

This enzyme belongs to the family of oxidoreductases, specifically those acting on a sulfur group of donors with a cytochrome as acceptor. The systematic name of this enzyme class is thiosulfate:ferricytochrome-c oxidoreductase. Other names in common use include tetrathionate synthase, thiosulfate oxidase, thiosulfate-oxidizing enzyme, and thiosulfate-acceptor oxidoreductase.

Structure

Thiosulfate dehydrogenase, isolated from the appreciably studied bacterial strain Allochromatium vinosum (253 peptide chain length, 25.8 kDa) is composed of two catalytic domains, each similar to cytochrome c, linked by a long unstructured peptide chain. [3] The N-terminal domain is structurally homologous to the SoxA family of cytochrome enzymes while the C-terminal domain is representative of the standard mitochondrial cytochrome c family fold with high similarity to nitrite reductase from P. haloplanktis. [4] Each domain contains a covalently bound iron-containing heme molecule separated by a short distance of 8.1 Å which assists with rapid electron transfer. [5] Both the N and C terminus domains contain 4 α helices (surrounding the heme in the corresponding domain) and a two-stranded anti-parallel β sheet, suggesting the enzyme resulted from a gene duplication event. [6]

The single active site of the enzyme is located in between the two domains (closer to the C-terminus domain) near the central iron heme.

Mechanism

Proposed mechanistic process of the reversible conversion of thiosulfate to tetrathionate in A. vinosum, catalyzed by a cysteine residue and two iron-containing hemes. Thiosulfate Dehydrogenase Mechanism.png
Proposed mechanistic process of the reversible conversion of thiosulfate to tetrathionate in A. vinosum, catalyzed by a cysteine residue and two iron-containing hemes.

There is controversy to the exact mechanism that the enzyme enables to occur, so the process remains ambiguous. Additionally, the variety of thiosulfate dehydrogenase enzymes among bacterial species implies several possible mechanisms of activity. [5] However, due to the striking similarity in structure the domains of thiosulfate dehydrogenase have to sulfur carrier protein SoxYZ and cytochrome SoxAX, a related mechanism can be derived for the thiosulfate dehydrogenase-catalyzed reaction in A. vinosum. The overall, generalized overview of the proposed mechanism of thiosulfate dehydrogenase can be summarized by the following two reversible redox reactions:

Step 1 indicates an initial binding of thiosulfate to an unusual and reactive cysteine S-sulphane adduct, forming a S-thiosulfonate adduct. Step 2 follows with an additional thiosulfate to subsequently form tetrathionate while reducing both hemes and leaving a typical cysteine residue. In the active site, the cysteine residue bound to the catalytic iron heme is essential for enzymatic activity, as the abolishment of this residue completely eliminated the enzyme's ability to both oxidize thiosulfate and reduce tetrathionate. [7] In A. vinosum, although the process is reversible, the reaction to form two thiosulfate ions is much slower than the formation of tetrathionate despite the reduction of tetrathionate to thiosulfate having a potential of +198 mV. [8]

Reduction of the enzyme results in a ligand switch from Lys208 to Met209 in the second heme. Mutant proteins that replace Met209 with asparagine or glycine have similar substrate affinities to the wildtype variant but have much lower specific activities, suggesting that heme 2 is the electron exit point in the last steps of the mechanism. [9] Upon the reduction of heme 2 and the ligand switch, the redox potential is increased and hinders the back reaction to form thiosulfate. Here, it is suggested that a high potential iron-sulfur protein (HiPIP) serves as the electron acceptor in the oxidation of both hemes to their initial state.

Function

The oxidation of thiosulfate to tetrathionate is observed in several thiobacilli, phototrophs, and heterotrophs, as thiosulfate and tetrathionate play the role of electron donor and electron acceptor, respectively, in many bacterial species. [10] Both compounds are intermediates in and play an important role in the biogeochemical sulfur cycle, the process of conversion between sulfide and sulfate. [11] Thus, thiosulfate dehydrogenase is essential for the conversion between the intermediates in the sulfur cycle. [12] The sulfur cycle enables a variety of bacteria to utilize generated thiosulfate as an electron donor for aerobic growth and anaerobic carbon dioxide fixation for photosynthesis. Pseudomonas and Halomonas are examples of the many thiobacteria that utilize thiosulfate dehydrogenase to derive energy from thiosulfate as a supplemental energy source. [13] Tetrathionate can serve as a respiratory electron acceptor during anaerobic respiration by tetrathionate reduction.

Industrial applications

Thiobacteria such as Acidithiobacillusferrooxidans have become essential to industrial bioleaching applications, as the microorganisms are able to oxidize iron and sulfur from iron-sulfur minerals as energy sources, supporting their own autotrophic growth while producing ferric iron and sulfuric acid. [14] Thus, bacteria have been isolated from mineral deposits and used in the treatment of refractory gold and iron ores and detoxification of industrial waste products, sewage, and soils contaminated with heavy metals. [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxidative phosphorylation</span> Metabolic pathway

Oxidative phosphorylation or electron transport-linked phosphorylation or terminal oxidation is the metabolic pathway in which cells use enzymes to oxidize nutrients, thereby releasing chemical energy in order to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In eukaryotes, this takes place inside mitochondria. Almost all aerobic organisms carry out oxidative phosphorylation. This pathway is so pervasive because it releases more energy than alternative fermentation processes such as anaerobic glycolysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coenzyme Q – cytochrome c reductase</span> Class of enzymes

The coenzyme Q : cytochrome c – oxidoreductase, sometimes called the cytochrome bc1 complex, and at other times complex III, is the third complex in the electron transport chain, playing a critical role in biochemical generation of ATP. Complex III is a multisubunit transmembrane protein encoded by both the mitochondrial and the nuclear genomes. Complex III is present in the mitochondria of all animals and all aerobic eukaryotes and the inner membranes of most eubacteria. Mutations in Complex III cause exercise intolerance as well as multisystem disorders. The bc1 complex contains 11 subunits, 3 respiratory subunits, 2 core proteins and 6 low-molecular weight proteins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metalloprotein</span> Protein that contains a metal ion cofactor

Metalloprotein is a generic term for a protein that contains a metal ion cofactor. A large proportion of all proteins are part of this category. For instance, at least 1000 human proteins contain zinc-binding protein domains although there may be up to 3000 human zinc metalloproteins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cytochrome c peroxidase</span>

Cytochrome c peroxidase, or CCP, is a water-soluble heme-containing enzyme of the peroxidase family that takes reducing equivalents from cytochrome c and reduces hydrogen peroxide to water:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Succinate dehydrogenase</span> Enzyme

Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) or succinate-coenzyme Q reductase (SQR) or respiratory complex II is an enzyme complex, found in many bacterial cells and in the inner mitochondrial membrane of eukaryotes. It is the only enzyme that participates in both the citric acid cycle and the electron transport chain. Histochemical analysis showing high succinate dehydrogenase in muscle demonstrates high mitochondrial content and high oxidative potential.

Ferredoxins are iron–sulfur proteins that mediate electron transfer in a range of metabolic reactions. The term "ferredoxin" was coined by D.C. Wharton of the DuPont Co. and applied to the "iron protein" first purified in 1962 by Mortenson, Valentine, and Carnahan from the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium pasteurianum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flavin adenine dinucleotide</span> Redox-active coenzyme

In biochemistry, flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) is a redox-active coenzyme associated with various proteins, which is involved with several enzymatic reactions in metabolism. A flavoprotein is a protein that contains a flavin group, which may be in the form of FAD or flavin mononucleotide (FMN). Many flavoproteins are known: components of the succinate dehydrogenase complex, α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, and a component of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex.

Iron–sulfur proteins are proteins characterized by the presence of iron–sulfur clusters containing sulfide-linked di-, tri-, and tetrairon centers in variable oxidation states. Iron–sulfur clusters are found in a variety of metalloproteins, such as the ferredoxins, as well as NADH dehydrogenase, hydrogenases, coenzyme Q – cytochrome c reductase, succinate – coenzyme Q reductase and nitrogenase. Iron–sulfur clusters are best known for their role in the oxidation-reduction reactions of electron transport in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Both Complex I and Complex II of oxidative phosphorylation have multiple Fe–S clusters. They have many other functions including catalysis as illustrated by aconitase, generation of radicals as illustrated by SAM-dependent enzymes, and as sulfur donors in the biosynthesis of lipoic acid and biotin. Additionally, some Fe–S proteins regulate gene expression. Fe–S proteins are vulnerable to attack by biogenic nitric oxide, forming dinitrosyl iron complexes. In most Fe–S proteins, the terminal ligands on Fe are thiolate, but exceptions exist.

Cytochrome b<sub>6</sub>f complex Enzyme

The cytochrome b6f complex (plastoquinol/plastocyanin reductase or plastoquinol/plastocyanin oxidoreductase; EC 7.1.1.6) is an enzyme found in the thylakoid membrane in chloroplasts of plants, cyanobacteria, and green algae, that catalyzes the transfer of electrons from plastoquinol to plastocyanin:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rieske protein</span> Protein family with an iron–sulfur center transferring electrons

Rieske proteins are iron–sulfur protein (ISP) components of cytochrome bc1 complexes and cytochrome b6f complexes and are responsible for electron transfer in some biological systems. John S. Rieske and co-workers first discovered the protein and in 1964 isolated an acetylated form of the bovine mitochondrial protein. In 1979 Trumpower's lab isolated the "oxidation factor" from bovine mitochondria and showed it was a reconstitutively-active form of the Rieske iron-sulfur protein
It is a unique [2Fe-2S] cluster in that one of the two Fe atoms is coordinated by two histidine residues rather than two cysteine residues. They have since been found in plants, animals, and bacteria with widely ranging electron reduction potentials from -150 to +400 mV.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rubredoxin</span>

Rubredoxins are a class of low-molecular-weight iron-containing proteins found in sulfur-metabolizing bacteria and archaea. Sometimes rubredoxins are classified as iron-sulfur proteins; however, in contrast to iron-sulfur proteins, rubredoxins do not contain inorganic sulfide. Like cytochromes, ferredoxins and Rieske proteins, rubredoxins are thought to participate in electron transfer in biological systems. Recent work in bacteria and algae have led to the hypothesis that some rubredoxins may instead have a role in delivering iron to metalloproteins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfite oxidase</span>

Sulfite oxidase is an enzyme in the mitochondria of all eukaryotes, with exception of the yeasts. It oxidizes sulfite to sulfate and, via cytochrome c, transfers the electrons produced to the electron transport chain, allowing generation of ATP in oxidative phosphorylation. This is the last step in the metabolism of sulfur-containing compounds and the sulfate is excreted.

Nitrite reductase refers to any of several classes of enzymes that catalyze the reduction of nitrite. There are two classes of NIR's. A multi haem enzyme reduces NO2 to a variety of products. Copper containing enzymes carry out a single electron transfer to produce nitric oxide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Formate dehydrogenase</span>

Formate dehydrogenases are a set of enzymes that catalyse the oxidation of formate to carbon dioxide, donating the electrons to a second substrate, such as NAD+ in formate:NAD+ oxidoreductase (EC 1.17.1.9) or to a cytochrome in formate:ferricytochrome-b1 oxidoreductase (EC 1.2.2.1). This family of enzymes has attracted attention as inspiration or guidance on methods for the carbon dioxide fixation, relevant to global warming.

In enzymology, an ethylbenzene hydroxylase (EC 1.17.99.2) is an enzyme that catalyzes the chemical reaction

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cytochrome c family</span> Protein family

Cytochromes c cytochromes, or heme-containing proteins, that have heme C covalently attached to the peptide backbone via one or two thioether bonds. These bonds are in most cases part of a specific Cys-X-X-Cys-His (CXXCH) binding motif, where X denotes a miscellaneous amino acid. Two thioether bonds of cysteine residues bind to the vinyl sidechains of heme, and the histidine residue coordinates one axial binding site of the heme iron. Less common binding motifs can include a single thioether linkage, a lysine or a methionine instead of the axial histidine or a CXnCH binding motif with n>2. The second axial site of the iron can be coordinated by amino acids of the protein, substrate molecules or water. Cytochromes c possess a wide range of properties and function as electron transfer proteins or catalyse chemical reactions involving redox processes. A prominent member of this family is mitochondrial cytochrome c.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High potential iron–sulfur protein</span>

High potential iron-sulfur proteins (HIPIP) are a class of iron-sulfur proteins. They are ferredoxins that participate in electron transfer in photosynthetic bacteria as well as in Paracoccus denitrificans.

Sulfur is metabolized by all organisms, from bacteria and archaea to plants and animals. Sulfur can have an oxidation state from -2 to +6 and is reduced or oxidized by a diverse range of organisms. The element is present in proteins, sulfate esters of polysaccharides, steroids, phenols, and sulfur-containing coenzymes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase</span>

Flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase, also known as Sulfide-cytochrome-c reductase (flavocytochrome c) (EC 1.8.2.3), is an enzyme with systematic name hydrogen-sulfide:flavocytochrome c oxidoreductase. It is found in sulfur-oxidising bacteria such as the purple phototrophic bacteria Allochromatium vinosum. This enzyme catalyses the following chemical reaction:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microbial oxidation of sulfur</span>

Microbial oxidation of sulfur is the oxidation of sulfur by microorganisms to build their structural components. The oxidation of inorganic compounds is the strategy primarily used by chemolithotrophic microorganisms to obtain energy to survive, grow and reproduce. Some inorganic forms of reduced sulfur, mainly sulfide (H2S/HS) and elemental sulfur (S0), can be oxidized by chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes, usually coupled to the reduction of oxygen (O2) or nitrate (NO3). Anaerobic sulfur oxidizers include photolithoautotrophs that obtain their energy from sunlight, hydrogen from sulfide, and carbon from carbon dioxide (CO2).

References

  1. Lu WP, Kelly DP (1988). "Cellular Location and Partial Purification of the 'Thiosulphate-oxidizing Enzyme' and 'Trithionate Hydrolyase' from Thiobacillus tepidarius". Microbiology. 134 (4): 877–885. doi: 10.1099/00221287-134-4-877 .
  2. Bamford, V. A. (2002). "Structural basis for the oxidation of thiosulfate by a sulfur cycle enzyme". The EMBO Journal. 21 (21): 5599–5610. doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf566. ISSN   1460-2075. PMC   131063 . PMID   12411478.
  3. PDB: 4V2K ; Grabarczyk DB, Chappell PE, Eisel B, Johnson S, Lea SM, Berks BC (April 2015). "Mechanism of thiosulfate oxidation in the SoxA family of cysteine-ligated cytochromes". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 290 (14): 9209–21. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.618025 . PMC   4423706 . PMID   25673696.
  4. Grabarczyk DB, Chappell PE, Eisel B, Johnson S, Lea SM, Berks BC (April 2015). "Mechanism of thiosulfate oxidation in the SoxA family of cysteine-ligated cytochromes". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 290 (14): 9209–21. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.618025 . PMC   4423706 . PMID   25673696.
  5. 1 2 Kurth JM, Brito JA, Reuter J, Flegler A, Koch T, Franke T, Klein EM, Rowe SF, Butt JN, Denkmann K, Pereira IA, Archer M, Dahl C (November 2016). "Electron Accepting Units of the Diheme Cytochrome c TsdA, a Bifunctional Thiosulfate Dehydrogenase/Tetrathionate Reductase". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 291 (48): 24804–24818. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.753863 . PMC   5122753 . PMID   27694441.
  6. Brito JA, Denkmann K, Pereira IA, Archer M, Dahl C (April 2015). "Thiosulfate dehydrogenase (TsdA) from Allochromatium vinosum: structural and functional insights into thiosulfate oxidation". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 290 (14): 9222–38. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.623397 . PMC   4423707 . PMID   25673691.
  7. Denkmann K, Grein F, Zigann R, Siemen A, Bergmann J, van Helmont S, Nicolai A, Pereira IA, Dahl C (October 2012). "Thiosulfate dehydrogenase: a widespread unusual acidophilic c-type cytochrome". Environmental Microbiology. 14 (10): 2673–88. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02820.x. PMID   22779704.
  8. Kurth JM, Dahl C, Butt JN (October 2015). "Catalytic Protein Film Electrochemistry Provides a Direct Measure of the Tetrathionate/Thiosulfate Reduction Potential". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 137 (41): 13232–5. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08291 . PMID   26437022.
  9. Brito JA, Gutierres A, Denkmann K, Dahl C, Archer M (October 2014). "Production, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of Allochromatium vinosum thiosulfate dehydrogenase TsdA, an unusual acidophilic c-type cytochrome". Acta Crystallographica Section F. 70 (Pt 10): 1424–7. doi:10.1107/S2053230X14019384. PMC   4188095 . PMID   25286955.
  10. Kelly DP, Wood AP (1994). "Chapter 36: Enzymes involved in microbiological oxidation of thiosulfate and polythionates". In Peck HD, LeGall J (eds.). Inorganic Microbial Sulfur Metabolism. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 243. pp. 501–510. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(94)43038-1. ISBN   978-0-12-182144-9.
  11. Zopfi J, Ferdelman TG, Fossing H (2004). "Distribution and fate of sulfur intermediates—sulfite, tetrathionate, thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur—in marine sediments". In Amend JP, Edwards KJ, Lyons TW (eds.). Sulfur Biogeochemistry - Past and Present. Vol. 379. Geological Society of America. pp. 97–116. doi:10.1130/0-8137-2379-5.97. ISBN   978-0-8137-2379-2.
  12. Sievert S, Kiene R, Schulz-Vogt H (2007). "The Sulfur Cycle". Oceanography. 20 (2): 117–123. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2007.55 . hdl: 1912/2786 .
  13. Podgorsek L, Imhoff JF (1999). "Tetrathionate production by sulfur oxidizing bacteria and the role of tetrathionate in the sulfur cycle of Baltic Sea sediments" (PDF). Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 17: 255–265. doi: 10.3354/ame017255 .
  14. Bosecker K (1997). "Bioleaching: metal solubilization by microorganisms". FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 20 (3–4): 591–604. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00340.x. S2CID   86689062.
  15. Rawlings DE (May 2005). "Characteristics and adaptability of iron- and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms used for the recovery of metals from minerals and their concentrates". Microbial Cell Factories. 4 (1): 13. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-4-13 . PMC   1142338 . PMID   15877814.