Trade union sponsorship of UK members of Parliament

Last updated

Trade union sponsorship of UK members of Parliament was a phenomenon whereby a union supported a member of the House of Commons with financial contributions.

Contents

Background

Until 1996, all Labour parliamentary candidates had to have their candidatures supported by one of the organisations affiliated to the Labour Party, principally the constituency Labour Parties and trade unions. Those supported by the trade unions were conventionally referred to as "sponsored MPs" and, pejoratively, as "kept men", a phrase first used by the Conservative Walter Elliot. [1] MPs were asked to declare their interests, and were not allowed to sign contracts which compelled them to achieve specific goals while in the Commons. [2] However, many wished to speak on behalf of the union in debates and ask questions on topics of interest to the union, [3] obtaining responses even when a union might be ignored. They could also keep unions informed of government or other public plans. If a union was unhappy with the position its sponsored MP took, it could speak out against them, or withdraw sponsorship. However, the sudden withdrawal of sponsorship was almost unknown; instead, an MP might be dropped at the next general election. [4]

Throughout the history of sponsorship, the unions themselves made all decisions as to which candidates to support. Some held internal elections, at which members could select which candidates would receive sponsorship, while others allowed their executives to make a decision, usually on the back of interviews with prospective candidates. Some unions set tests for potential candidates. [4]

Sponsored MPs tended to regard the Labour Party as the party of the trade unions, and resisted the efforts of some other MPs to break those links. [5]

Liberal-Labour MPs

Early sponsored MPs aligned themselves with the Radical section of the Liberal Party. [5] The actual sponsorship in these years was not necessarily formal, the Lib-Lab MPs including some sponsored by local committees. [6] There were also some Lib-Lab MPs who were only elected after they had ceased involvement in a trade union, such as Cremer or Hardie. [7] However, sixty MPs between 1874 and 1910 had clear links. [6] The Lib-Labs were broadly accepted in the Liberal Party, although slightly marginalised due to their lack of personal wealth; for example, Charles Fenwick was not invited to the Speakers' dinner in 1892 because he did not own formal clothes. [8] Burns and Hardie emphasised their working class membership, and were considered more controversial. [9] Some stood as Lib Labs up to 1918, including Burt, Brace, Kenyon, Galbraith and A. J. Bailey of the General Workers(?)

The early Labour Party

Until 1911, Member of Parliament were not paid, and so workers could not afford to take up a seat in the Commons without sponsorship. Unions covered both electoral expenses and maintenance payments, to fund the living costs of an MP. Those Labour MPs who did not receive union sponsorship were instead paid from the Parliamentary Fund of the Labour Party, which was raised in part from unions. Even after salaries were introduced, they were low, and made it difficult for MPs to survive entirely on them, so the maintenance element endured for many years. [4]

In the early years, they provided trade unions with access to Parliament, and many were senior union officials. [10]

Union 1900 [11] 1906 [12] 1910 Jan 1910 Dec [13]
CandidatesMPsCandidatesMPsCandidatesMPsCandidatesMPs
ASC&J 00213121
ASE 00525222
ASLP 00110000
ASPD 00001000
ASRS 11323333
ASS 10222111
ASLEF 00100000
BSSA 10223121
DWR 00100000
FTU 00001000
FSIF 00111111
LSC 00111111
MFGB 002 [14] 2 [14] 271723 [15] 17 [15]
NAFTA 00111111
NAUSAWC 00211110
NAC 0000101 [16] 1 [16]
NUB 00001000
NUBSO 00112000
NUDL 00101000
NUGW 102 [17] 1 [17] 2111
NUT 00000010
OSM 00100000
Postmen 00101000
TA 00111111
UPA 00001111
USB 00200000
UTFWA 00222232
Trades councils103 [17] 1 [17] 0000
Total51372262344233

Sponsorship of MPs from other parties

Although the large majority of trade unions sponsored MPs initially from the Liberal Party, and later from the Labour Party, a few tried to spread their sponsorship between different parties. James Mawdsley stood as a Conservative-Labour candidate in 1899, as did Fortescue Flannery of the Amalgamated Society of Engineers in 1906, but neither was elected.

From 1895 on, the National Union of Teachers sponsored candidates. It did not affiliate to any party, but attempted to balance the number of candidates between the Liberal, Labour and Conservative parties. From 1922 onwards, the majority of successful candidate were from the Labour Party, and although it continued to sponsor member of the other parties, it sometimes failed to interest candidates in standing for the other parties. [18]

The Scottish Miners' Federation did not develop a relationship with the Liberal Party. It initially sponsored candidates from the Scottish United Trades Councils Labour Party, then the Independent Labour Party, followed by the Scottish Workers' Representation Committee. The Durham Colliery Mechanics' Association stood John Wilkinson Taylor in 1906 as an independent candidate, and Ebby Edwards was sponsored as an independent by the Northumberland Miners' Association in 1918. Of these, only Taylor was elected, and he later joined the Labour Party. [19] [20]

The National Farmers' Union sponsored a National Party candidate and five independents at the 1918 UK general election, none of whom were elected. At the 1922 election, it sponsored three independents and four Conservative party candidates, of whom only the Conservatives were elected, and it continued to sponsor Conservative candidates until 1935. However, it was not part of the trade union movement and the sponsored candidates did not have a similar status to sponsored MPs in the Labour Party. [21]

The United Patternmakers' Association's general secretary, George Buchanan, remained with the Independent Labour Party after it split from the Labour Party in 1931, and it sponsored him in that election. By 1935, the union withdrew official sponsorship for him, but it set up a voluntary fund to back him to which members could choose to donate. He subsequently returned to the Labour Party. [22]

The Labour Party between the wars

Increasing responsibilities of both MPs and union leaders tended to prevent people from combining the two after World War I, although there were exceptions, principally in the National Union of General and Municipal Workers. [23] Increasingly, sponsored MPs were retired officials, or those who had been defeated in elections but the union still wished to maintain. [24] Even though some proved fairly ineffective as politicians, trade unions which sponsored them gained prestige in the movement. Trade unions often paid the large majority of expenses of their sponsored candidates, but their main influence lay in sending delegates to selection meetings to secure the adoption of their preferred candidate. They preferred to sponsor candidates in safe seats, and so the majority were successful in winning election. [25]

Some MPs were not sponsored by their union. In the case of the Union of Post Office Workers, from 1927, the union was barred from affiliating to the Labour Party. Instead, its candidates were sponsored by a Direct Parliamentary Representation Society, with the same membership as the union. [26] Some candidates sponsored by Divisional Labour Parties received small payments from the unions of which they held membership, such as Emmanuel Shinwell, or those backed by the National Union of Agricultural Workers. Other trade union members received no support at all from their union, such as F. W. Jowett. [27]

The sponsorship of candidates and MPs in this period was not always clearly recorded until the 1929 UK general election. However, it is clear the large majority of trade union-sponsored candidates were in urban areas, with most of the remainder in coalfield seats. Following the Labour Party's landslide defeat in the 1931 UK general election, although a lower percentage of trade union candidates won their seats, they represented a record high proportion of the much smaller parliamentary party. During this period, only one trade union-sponsored MP was a woman: Ellen Wilkinson, of the National Union of Distributive and Allied Workers. [22]

With the 1933 Hastings Agreement, for the first time, the Labour Party regulated trade union sponsorship, limiting the amount of election and organisational expenses, and costs of an agent, that unions could cover. [4]

Union 1918 [28] 1922 [28] 1923 [28] 1924 [28] 1929 [29] 1931 [29] 1935 [29]
CandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPs
ABFSWS 00000000100000
ASC&J/ASW 5 [30] 16 [31] 16 [30] 36 [32] 2665142
ASDFKT 00000000111011
ASE/AEU 17115 [33] 7 [33] 7 [33] 4 [33] 333233
ASLEF 3 [34] 01 [34] 01 [34] 01 [34] 1110011
ASPD 00000000101010
AUBTW N/AN/A000000001010
AUCE/NUDAW 014 [35] 1 [35] 4645195
BFAWU 00100000000011
BISAKTA 424 [36] 24 [36] 13 [36] 3543121
CIOM&KTA 10111110N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
CMSA 11111111111000
FSIF/NUFW 21101011111000
LSC 11 [37] 22 [37] 22 [37] 22 [37] 222022
MFGB 5125524147434740424243263832
NAFTA 21001110110000
NAOP 00000000100000
NATSOPA 10101110111010
NAULAW N/AN/A000000001000
NSPW 00000011111011
NUAW 20302120304000
NUB 10101110100000
NUBSO 114 [38] 23 [38] 120525030
NUGW/NUGMW 74 [39] 4 [39] 5 [39] 7 [39] 4 [39] 86112116
NUR 6112 [40] 35 [40] 3 [40] 7 [41] 3118100125
NUS 00000000000010
NUTW 00111011101010
NUVB 10101111111011
OBDFA 00000000001010
PSU 00101110110000
RCA 608 [42] 05 [42] 1 [42] 7 [42] 08770106
TA 11211111111021
TGWU N/AN/A710101713161117
UPA 00111111112111
UPW N/AN/A6 [43] 26 [43] 36 [43] 2665030
USB 5 [44] 15 [44] 15 [44] 26 [44] 24 [44] 15 [44] 121
UTFWA 10 [45] 410 [45] 37 [45] 37 [46] 2648060
WU 2 [47] 0 [47] 6 [47] 2 [47] 6 [47] 26 [47] 56 [47] 6 [47] N/AN/AN/AN/A
Other unions5968168040003
Total1634915786129102144881391141383512978
Others in 1918: Dockers: 4, Postmen: 4, [43] Fawcett Assoc: 1, [43] P&TCA: 4 [43]

The Labour Party after World War II

The maintenance payments made by unions tended not to be increased, so by the 1950s, they formed a less significant portion of MP's income, and many unions phased them out. However, the payment of election and organisation expenses remained significant. By 1983, the GMB, AEU, NUM and NUR all paid the maximum amounts permitted under the revised Hastings agreement, but other unions, such as the TGWU and ASTMS, paid less than half of this. [4]

Constituencies were more likely to select candidates with union sponsorship, but from the late 1950s, this effect weakened, as the local dominance of individual industries, such as mining, declined, and in many cases, unions were less likely to affiliate to constituency labour parties. [4]

By the 1960s, unions increasingly saw the role as symbolic, and the sponsorship as a way of more broadly supporting the Labour Party, many sponsored MPs having little or no previous activity in the union. [10] Sponsored MPs usually met with union officials, sometimes on a quarterly basis, but often felt that the relationship with their union suffered from poor communication and a lack of more regular contact. In some cases, MPs gave regular reports to a union's executive, conference or journal. [4]

By the 1970s, manufacturing unions were in decline, and far more MPs were sponsored by white collar unions. [48] The National Union of Mineworkers, in particular, saw a big decline in the number of MPs it sponsored, while the ASTMS, NUPE and TASS greatly increased their representation. The major general unions, the TGWU and GMB, also increased their representation, and the TGWU over took the NUM as the union sponsoring the most MPs. [4]

Union 1945 1950 1951 1955 1959 1964 1966 1970 1974 Feb 1974 Oct
CandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPs
ACT 00001000000000000000
AESD/DATA/TASS 0020220203022444444
AEU 4410813812615819171717211621171816
ASLEF 12223232331111001000
ASSET/ASTMS 00000000001122431491312
ASW 4333332221101112N/AN/AN/AN/A
AUBTW/UCATT 11101010001111113233
BISAKTA 22222222221111223222
CAWU/APEX 1121121213144336666
CEU 00000000001111111111
ETU/EETPU 11213120405121333333
FBU 00000000001111100000
LSC/NGA 22000000001122101000
MU 00000000001111211010
NATSOPA 1111111000000000000
NAULAW 111100000000N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
NUAW 31212131423111200011
NUB 00000010001111111111
NUBSO/NUFLAT 44211100000010001000
NUDAW/USDAW 8898109109109101088796655
NUDBTW 00000010000000000000
NUFTO/FTAT 0000000002000112121
NUFW/AUFW 00101000000000000000
NUGMW 1010106764464991010121213131313
NUM 3434373737363534313129282827212021182018
NUPE 0011322212255667676
NUR 13121210109118957687657666
NUS 00100000100010112111
NUTGW 00000000110000000000
NUVB 0000001011111111N/AN/AN/AN/A
POEU/NCU 00000000000010313222
SCMU 0000000000000010N/AN/AN/AN/A
SUBAW 00100000000000000000
TA 22211111110000000000
TGWU 1817191617141614191423212727231923232321
TSSA 99117117105857755445343
TWU 00000000100000000000
UTFWA 33323121211111100000
UPA 2200111111100001000
UPW 11314221223244315242
Total1261211401101371051299612993138120138132137114155127141129

End of the system

By the 1980s, many unions had moved from holding elections to identify candidates, to setting tests. Another trend was to co-opt existing MPs, with their agreement, who may have had no previous link with the union, but were willing to work with it in exchange for sponsorship. Most unions removed any requirement to have worked in the industry they represented, although the NUM and ASE continued to only sponsor candidates with trade experience. In some cases, such as that of Frank Dobson, this was deemed a success; he was the son of a railway worker and regularly spoke up on issues of interest to the National Union of Railwaymen. However, in other cases, such as that of the Confederation of Health Service Employees, many sponsored MPs had little connection with union and did little to represent its interests. Some MPs hoped to receive a front-bench portfolio and focus on that, rather than union matters. [4]

Even where trade unions still sponsored members to stand for election, many introduced bans on salaried officials doing so, not wanting to lose their expertise. The Post Office Engineering Union took a different approach, and instead required John Golding to stand down as an MP on his election as general secretary of the union. [4]

The NUR attempted to reform its relationship with its sponsored MPs in 1976, by appointing Keith Hill as Political Liaison Officer, based in Westminster, and focusing on communicating with, researching for, and giving Parliamentary Questions to, the MPs. This practice was copied first by the TGWU, which appointed Jenny Pardington as Parliamentary Liaison Assistant, and then Alan Meale of ASLEF, Roger Godsiff of APEX, Bill Gilby of NUPE, Angela Eagle of COHSE, and John Starmer of the NCU. The officers began working together through Trade Unionists for a Labour Victory, which broadened into the TUCC and then TUFL, campaigning for a stronger trade union role in political matters. [4]

Despite these changes, the proportion of sponsored MPs rose through the 1980s, largely because of the smaller number of Labour MPs. By 1990, more than 60% of the party's MPs were sponsored. There was also a slow growth in the number of women who were sponsored, although their numbers remained small. Another major change was the proportion of the frontbench which was sponsored; by 1989, all but two Shadow Cabinet members were sponsored, and they were given limited assistance by the GMB. However, some unions felt that they were better off sponsoring backbenchers, as they would have more time to devote to union interests, and would be less sensitive to any press criticisms of union influence over their activities. [4]

The system led to a poor distribution of resources, with most union funds supporting MPs in safe seats, who were least in need of the election and agent expenses. In addition, some unions became frustrated that they could not get candidates adopted in seats where they had traditionally sponsored the MP, and in some cases, struggled to get them adopted in any winnable seats. [4]

The system for adopting candidates was changed in the 1980s, with an electoral college system created, giving affiliated unions a fixed but minority say in decisions. In 1990, it was changed again to a one member one vote system, despite the concerns of many unions that the party leadership was seeking to reduce their influence in the party. [4]

The Committee on Standards in Public Life issued the Nolan Report in 1995, which expressed concerns that the sponsorship system could be abused. In response, the following year, the Labour Party abolished the system. Thereafter, trade unions were invited to sponsor constituencies, rather than MPs, enabling the party to direct funding to marginal seats, and reduce the ability of unions to put forward preferred candidates. [49] [50]

Union1979 [51] 1983 [52] 1987 [53] 1992 [54]
CandMPsCandMPsCandMPsCandMPs
AEU 1816271315121513
APEX 653333N/AN/A
ASLEF 10200021
ASTMS/MSF 1281110981313
BISAKTA 22313110
CEU 11N/AN/AN/AN/A
COHSE 63338466
ETU/EETPU 447333103
FBU 001100
GMB 1414141112112217
NACODS 00112111
NATSOPA/SOGAT 002222N/AN/A
NCU 43332243
NGA/GPMU 10102075
NUAW 11N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
NUB 1111N/AN/AN/AN/A
NUFLAT 1000N/AN/A
NUFTO/FTAT 110000
NUM 1816141413131414
NUPE 8710101681512
NUR/RMT 13121210981312
NUS 111111N/AN/A
NUSMWCHDE 100N/AN/AN/AN/A
SLADE 0022N/AN/AN/AN/A
TASS 54N/A [55] 575N/AN/A
TGWU 2920302644334438
TSSA 33102222
UCATT 42211100
UPW 22111110
USDAW 65229833
USB 22N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Other unions00110000
Total159132153114146130199157

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Union of Railwaymen</span> Trade union of railway workers in the United Kingdom

The National Union of Railwaymen was a trade union of railway workers in the United Kingdom. The largest railway workers' union in the country, it was influential in the national trade union movement.

The Workers' Union was a general union based in the United Kingdom, but with some branches in other countries. During the 1910s, it was the largest general union in the UK, but it entered a rapid decline in the 1920s, and eventually became part of the Transport and General Workers' Union (TGWU).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iron and Steel Trades Confederation</span> Former trade union of the United Kingdom

The Iron and Steel Trades Confederation (ISTC) was a British trade union for metal-workers and allied groups, being the largest union in these fields. It was formed on 1 January 1917 as a merger of existing steel-workers' unions and it is now part of Community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amalgamated Engineering Union</span> Trade union in the UK

The Amalgamated Engineering Union (AEU) was a major British trade union. It merged with the Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union to form the Amalgamated Engineering and Electrical Union in 1992.

The Scottish Commercial Motormen's Union was a trade union in the United Kingdom. It merged with the Transport and General Workers' Union in 1971.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Union of Vehicle Builders</span> Former trade union of the United Kingdom

The National Union of Vehicle Builders (NUVB) was a trade union in the United Kingdom. The NUVB represented a mixture of skilled and unskilled workers in the automotive industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Union of Agricultural and Allied Workers</span> Former trade union of the United Kingdom

The National Union of Agricultural and Allied Workers (NUAW) was a trade union in the United Kingdom which existed between 1906 and 1982. It represented farmworkers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Union of Dyers, Bleachers and Textile Workers</span> Former trade union of the United Kingdom

The National Union of Dyers, Bleachers and Textile Workers (NUDBTW) was a trade union in the United Kingdom.

The 1955 Labour Party leadership election was held following the resignation of Clement Attlee. Attlee was Prime Minister from 1945 to 1951 and stayed on as party leader until he lost the 1955 general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur Creech Jones</span> British trade union official and politician

Arthur Creech Jones was a British trade union official and politician. Originally a civil servant, his imprisonment as a conscientious objector during the First World War forced him to change careers. He was elected to Parliament in 1935 and developed a reputation for interest in colonial matters, gaining the nickname "unofficial member of the Kikuyu at Westminster". He served in the Colonial Office in the Labour government of 1945–1950. After losing his seat in the 1950 general election he was involved in writing and lecturing about British colonies, before returning to Parliament in 1954. Initially, he was known as Arthur Jones, but throughout his time in politics he invariably used his middle name.

Arthur Cecil Allen was a British footwear manufacturer, trade union officer and Member of Parliament. He served as an Opposition Whip, but his most important position was as Parliamentary Private Secretary to Hugh Gaitskell during the first few years as Leader of the Opposition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Gosling</span> British Labour Party politician and trade union leader

Harry Gosling CH was a British Labour Party politician and trade union leader.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amalgamated Society of Boilermakers, Shipwrights, Blacksmiths and Structural Workers</span> Former trade union of the United Kingdom

The Amalgamated Society of Boilermakers, Shipwrights, Blacksmiths and Structural Workers (ASB) was a trade union in the United Kingdom. Many of its members worked in shipbuilding, in which industry it was the leading trade union, while over time it also developed strength in engineering and construction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Union of Distributive and Allied Workers</span> Former trade union of the United Kingdom

The National Union of Distributive and Allied Workers (NUDAW) was a trade union in the United Kingdom.

The Labour Electoral Association was a political organisation in the United Kingdom which aimed to get working men elected to Parliament.

The United Textile Factory Workers' Association (UTFWA) was a trade union federation in Great Britain. It was active from 1889 until 1975.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugh Hartley Lawrie</span> English politician

Hugh Hartley Lawrie (1879–1945) was a British trade unionist and politician, elected as Labour MP for Stalybridge and Hyde from 1929 to 1931.

The Prudential Staff Union was a trade union representing workers at the Prudential insurance company, in the United Kingdom. The only union of insurance workers to affiliate to the Labour Party, it was briefly represented on its National Executive Committee, and for a time sponsored a Member of Parliament.

This article lists the Labour Party's election results from the 1922 United Kingdom general election to 1929, including by-elections.

Several British members of Parliament have been sponsored by mining trade unions. Many were sponsored by the National Union of Mineworkers, its predecessor the Miners' Federation of Great Britain, and the local trade unions which preceded it.

References

  1. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. xiv. ISBN   0855271841.
  2. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. xv. ISBN   0855271841.
  3. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. xix. ISBN   0855271841.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Minkin, Lewis (1992). The Contentious Alliance: Trade Unions and the Labour Party. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 241–279. ISBN   0748604049.
  5. 1 2 Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. xviii. ISBN   0855271841.
  6. 1 2 Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. 3. ISBN   0855271841.
  7. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. pp. 3–4. ISBN   0855271841.
  8. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. pp. 8–9. ISBN   0855271841.
  9. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. 9. ISBN   0855271841.
  10. 1 2 Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. xvii. ISBN   0855271841.
  11. Frank Bealey and Henry Pelling, Labour and Politics, 1900-1906, p.289
  12. Frank Bealey and Henry Pelling, Labour and Politics, 1900-1906, pp.290-292
  13. Tanner, Duncan (1990). Political change and the Labour Party 1900-1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 328. ISBN   0521329817.
  14. 1 2 Sponsored by the Lancashire and Cheshire Miners' Federation, an affiliate of the MFGB
  15. 1 2 One successful candidate jointly sponsored with the Independent Labour Party
  16. 1 2 Jointly sponsored with the Fabian Society
  17. 1 2 3 4 One successful candidate jointly sponsored by the National Union of General Workers and the West Ham Trades Council
  18. Butler, David; Freeman, Jennie (1969). British Political Facts: 1900-1968 (3 ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   9780333070796.
  19. Howell, David (1983). British Workers and the Independent Labour Party, 1888-1906. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 16–51. ISBN   0719017912.
  20. Frank Bealey and Henry Pelling, Labour and Politics 1900-1906, p.296
  21. Craig, F. W. S. (1975). Minor Parties in British By-elections, 1885-1974. London: Macmillan Press. p. 56.
  22. 1 2 Parker, James (2017). Trade unions and the political culture of the Labour Party, 1931-1940 (PDF). Exeter: University of Exeter. p. 125.
  23. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. pp. 28–29. ISBN   0855271841.
  24. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. pp. 32–33. ISBN   0855271841.
  25. Parker, James (2017). Trade unions and the political culture of the Labour Party, 1931-1940 (PDF). Exeter: University of Exeter. p. 125.
  26. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. 29. ISBN   0855271841.
  27. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. x32. ISBN   0855271841.
  28. 1 2 3 4 Cole, G. D. H. (1948). History of the Labour Party from 1914. Routledge. pp. 87, 130, 155 and 171. ISBN   9781138333352.
  29. 1 2 3 Harrison, Martin (1960). Trade unions and the Labour Party since 1945. Routledge. pp. 265–267. ISBN   9781138325050.
  30. 1 2 Higgenbottam, Samuel (1939). Our Society's History. Amalgamated Society of Woodworkers. pp. 283–284.
  31. The Monthly Journal of the Amalgamated Society of Woodworkers for July 1921 lists seven candidates. W. T. Wilson died before the election could take place, but the other six candidates went to the poll.
  32. "Woodworkers' six for Parliament". Manchester Guardian. 28 July 1924.
  33. 1 2 3 4 Jefferys, James B. (1970). The Story of the Engineers. Edinburgh: Reprints in Social and Economic History. p. 230.
  34. 1 2 3 4 McKillop, Norman (1950). The Lighted Flame; a History of the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen. London & Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd.
  35. 1 2 "Trade unions' "parliamentary panels"". Manchester Guardian. 19 September 1923.
  36. 1 2 3 Pugh, Arthur (1951). Men of Steel. London: Iron and Steel Trades Confederation.
  37. 1 2 3 4 Howe, Ellic; Waite, Harold E. (1948). London Society of Compositors. London: Cassell. pp. 323–325.
  38. 1 2 Fox, Alan (1958). A History of the National Union of Boot and Shoe Operatives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. p. 462.
  39. 1 2 3 4 5 Clegg, H. A. (1954). General Union. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. p. 304.
  40. 1 2 3 "Only five railway union candidates". Manchester Guardian. 19 November 1923.
  41. "Labour's candidates". Manchester Guardian. 11 October 1924.
  42. 1 2 3 4 Wallace, Malcolm (1996). Single or return. Transport Salaried Staffs' Association.
  43. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Clinton, Alan (1984). Post Office Workers: A Trade Union and Social History. London: George Allen and Unwin. pp. 672–676. ISBN   9780043310861.
  44. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Mortimer, J. E. (1982). History of the Boilermakers' Society. Vol. 2. London: George Allen and Unwin. pp. 116–220. ISBN   0043310850.
  45. 1 2 3 Fowler, Alan (1999). "Lancashire to Westminster: a study of cotton trade union officials and British labour 1910-39". Labour History Review (1): 1–22.
  46. "Seven textile workers' candidates". Manchester Guardian. 15 October 1924.
  47. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hyman, Richard (1971). The Workers' Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 154–155.
  48. Muller, William D. (1977). The 'Kept Men'?. Hassocks: Harvester Press. p. 61. ISBN   0855271841.
  49. Brown, Colin (7 August 1995). "Labour to end union backing of MPs". The Independent. Retrieved 31 May 2021.
  50. Wintour, Patrick (28 February 1996). "Blair to end union sponsorship". The Guardian.
  51. "Parliamentary Labour candidates and election results, 3 May 1979". Report of the Seventy-Eighth Annual Conference of the Labour Party: 406–431. 1979.
  52. General Election Guide. BBC Data Publications. 1983. ISBN   094635815X.
  53. David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh (1987), The British General Election of 1987, p.206
  54. David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh (1992), The British General Election of 1992, p.227
  55. Included in AEU figure